Re: Equal access to content

From: Blaine Christian (no email)
Date: Wed Nov 02 2005 - 10:20:46 EST

  • Next message: Christian Kuhtz: "Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions"

    >
    > aol/google/content-provider-foo might provide exclusive content for a
    > higher (or lower) price than to normal folks, it also might be
    > bitten by
    > the lose of potential customers that way :( This sounds like a
    > business
    > decision not a legislative one, eh?
    >
    >
    >> Connection web site, should Disney be required to offer it to all
    >> Internet
    >> users equally? The NFL offers its Sunday Ticket exclusively through
    >> DirecTV? Or must the NFL offer the same content to every network?
    >>
    >>
    >
    > no one cares about football... Now, hockey! That's a sport that
    > everyone
    > should get access to! :)
    >
    >

    <insert tongue in cheek here>

    I, for one, welcome Christopher Morrow, and Sean Donelan as my new
    monopoly overlords. I'd like to remind him that as a trusted former
    associate/acquaintance, I can be helpful in rounding up others to
    toil in their underground sugar caves.

      </insert tongue in cheek here>

    And yes, it has been done to death... I am not proud...


  • Next message: Christian Kuhtz: "Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD