Re: Equal access to content

From: Randy Bush (no email)
Date: Wed Nov 02 2005 - 09:07:14 EST

  • Next message: Pete Templin: "Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now"

    >> the two year window is far too low given the sbc ceo's recent public
    >> statements on the use of his wires by google and the like.
    > Should content suppliers be required to provide equal access to all
    > networks? Or can content suppliers enter into exclusive contracts?

    the content providers are not common carriers whose irreplacable
    access to the customer prem was subsidized by public funding and
    protection.

    and perhaps we should be declaring our employment affiliations.
    mine is iij, a large japanese/asian non-carrier isp with some
    service in the us, plus various consulting gigs, none for content
    providers.

    randy


  • Next message: Pete Templin: "Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD