Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now

From: Pete Templin (no email)
Date: Tue Nov 01 2005 - 10:23:56 EST

  • Next message: Jon Lewis: "Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now"

    John Curran wrote:

    > Cold-potato only addresses the long-haul; there's still cost on the
    > receiving network even if its handed off at the closest interconnect
    > to the final destination(s).

    And there's still revenue, as the traffic is going to customers (we all
    filter our prefixes carefully, right?). What's the problem with
    cold-potato again, or should we all just try to double-dip?

    pt

  • Next message: Jon Lewis: "Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    		Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD