Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now

From: Stephen J. Wilcox (no email)
Date: Tue Nov 01 2005 - 07:27:16 EST

  • Next message: John Curran: "Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now"

    Hi John,

    > Even with cold-potato routing, there is an expense in handling increased
    > levels of traffic that is destined for your network. This increase in traffic
    > often has no new revenue associated with it, because it is fanning out to
    > thousands of flat-rate consumer/small-business connections (e.g. DSL)
    > where billing is generally by peak capacity not usage.

    not true for cogent tho, we know that virtually all their traffic is usage based
    transit customers

    Steve

  • Next message: John Curran: "Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    		Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD