Re: UltraDNS - are there any brain cells left?

From: Matt Ghali (no email)
Date: Tue Nov 01 2005 - 01:53:26 EST

  • Next message: Alexander Koch: "Re: UltraDNS - are there any brain cells left?"

    On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Rodney Joffe wrote:

      As one of the remaining idiots, allow me to respond to you
      initially here on NANOG - albeit 2 weeks later after being on the
      road at NANOG and ARIN.

    Thank you for acknowledging my presence as a customer. I had a brief
    bout of (mis)communication with your support staff, but
    communication abruptly ended two weeks ago. Oddly enough, I sent in
    a ping to them this afternoon.

      You're obviously hoping that posting an inflamatory note in a
      public forum will get you more action from UltraDNS, or will help
      show the world how clueful you are.

    Inflamatory? Wow. Have you met Mr. Kettle, Dr. Pot? I am thrilled
    that UltraDNS is fine with you disclosing customer data in public.

    Having lost all hope in getting a useful response from support,
    nanog was my last hope of getting the attention of someone clueful
    down there at UltraDNS. Unfortunately, it seems, I got your
    attention instead.

      Either way, so be it. If you want to follow up to this, do so by
      emailing me privately. The list already has way too much noise
      from home cable and dsl users with zero responsibility for real
      networks of any significance.

    I agree! Your representation of UDNS is much better reading than all
    those darn kiddies. You _are_ representing UDNS, right? You do seem
    to have access to proprietary customer data.
      
      
      Perhaps you could provide a snippet of this empirical evidence -
      perhaps logs of any successful zone transfers from your master to
      any UltraDNS slave that was achieved via use of TSIG?

    The boat I'm in was caused by a double-disk failure. Not
    surprisingly, I lost logs as well as config.

      There have been 3,900 transfers so far into UltraDNS from your
      various masters that have occurred successfully without the
      benefit of a TSIG key, starting on the day (October 9, 2002) that

    Well, that's surprising. From the day I obtained service from
    Secondary.com, I configured both the tsig key they provided me, as
    well as covering allow-transfer address ranges "just in case".

      UltraDNS voluntarily took responsibility for the 5,000 odd free
      accounts that the original Nominum provided under secondary.com,
      and that UltraDNS has continued to provide at no charge. On that
      day, a large number of secondary.com users (many of them on NANOG)
      responded properly to the UltraDNS emailed instructions, and they
      have successfully been doing zone transfers using TSIG.

    Are you suggesting that I am not a paying UDNS customer? You don't
    come out and say it, since that would be a lie- but you do a great
    job of casting aspersions.

      
      That's because you cannot configure TSIG zone transfers within the
      UltraDNS UI - TSIG transfers occur to a dedicated set of TSIG
      servers within UltraDNS, and as all users of TSIG within UltraDNS
      know, the UltraDNS UI then shows the IP address for transfers as
      the dedicated UltraDNS TSIG axfr servers, *not* those of the
      user's.

    That's great- but you know as well as I do that the keys were from
    Secondary.com (Nominum) and not UDNS. Thanks for the hand-waving,
    though.

      
      I think that you have us confused with some other provider of
      yours. Our logs and system confirm that your free secondary.com
      domains (such as snark.net) have *never* been transferred to
      UltraDNS using TSIG, but have always been done using normal axfr.

    What about my paid-for domains, Rodney? I think you have me confused
    with another customer.
      
      
      Uh, you obviously mean someone else. UltraDNS has never used your
      TSIG key to do transfers for snark.net, as far as I can tell. Once
      again, do you have any records of any TSIG transfers to us?
      
    > Earlier this year, I lost the key
    > when my nameserver had a nasty double-disk failure.
      
      H'mmmm. Forgive me for being confused - this was whose stupidity
      and lack of brain cells? The lack of backups of critical data like
      TSIG keys, etc?
      
    Could you take a break from publically insulting your customers, and
    confirm that you have a grasp of what happens when both sides of a
    mirrored pair of disks die within 3 hours of each other?

      
      Our TSIG servers (they are different machines to our normal axfr machines)
      have audit trails back to October 9, 2002. There is no record of your zone
      having ever been configured within them.

    It is surprising to me, and quite dissapointing, that UDNS did not
    continue authenticating zone transfers via TSIG, like Secondary.com
    did.
      
      
      Nope. We have never transferred data from you to our TSIG servers.
      So we have never had a key for that domain, or the zone it is in.

    Sorry, you're plain wrong. I had a tsig key from Nominum. If UDNS
    lost them in the transition, then it really isn't my bad. What part
    of UDNS blowing it is my fault?

      
      Whatever. I get the feeling that NANOG (from 11 or 12 years of
      participation) is not the best place for folks to work out their
      personal issues that require rants.
      
      Rodney Joffe
      Apparent Brainless Dolt
      UltraDNS

    I get the feeling a lot of folks have a vastly different opinion of
    your employer, as well. Thanks for the assistance!

    matt ghali

    --------------------------------------------<darwin><
                  The only thing necessary for the triumph
                  of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke


  • Next message: Alexander Koch: "Re: UltraDNS - are there any brain cells left?"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD