Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering

From: David Sinn (no email)
Date: Wed Oct 05 2005 - 17:17:09 EDT

  • Next message: Richard Irving: "Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering)"

    So this is all well and good while some measure of V6 is tunneled, but
    one should be wondering what these games of chicken mean to V6 when it
    is native. Given that most organizations won't meet the qualifications
    to be multi-homed, stunts like this will have a greater impact then
    this one is having today. Doesn't exactly leave a warm fuzzy that the
    current direction for IPv6 services is sane....

    David

    On Oct 5, 2005, at 12:08 PM, wrote:

    >
    > On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 06:01:15 -0400, Richard A Steenbergen
    > proclaimed...
    >
    >>
    >> I guess the earlier reports of (3)'s lack of testicular fortitude may
    >> have
    >> been exagerated after all. :)
    >
    > Luckily, many of us have ipv6 tunnels that managed to help us get
    > around
    > this. See, ipv6 has a purpose, afterall! :-)
    >


  • Next message: Richard Irving: "Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering)"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD