Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering

From: Simon Lockhart (no email)
Date: Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:19:31 EDT

  • Next message: william(at)elan.net: "Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering"

    On Wed Oct 05, 2005 at 10:43:51AM -0700, Jeff Shultz wrote:
    > Level 3 and Cogent can't be operating in a vacuums - if we can get to
    > Kevin Bacon in 6 degrees, Level 3 and Cogent should be able to get to
    > each other in under 30 hops through other providers.
    >
    > And why isn't this apparently happening automatically? Pardon the
    > density of my brain matter here, but I thought that was what BGP was all
    > about?

    Yes, it could have - I'm led to believe that one of the parties does purchase
    transit. However, moving all that traffic over transit rather than peering
    would cost them a significant amount of money - and as they're running their
    transit service at extremely low cost, they probably would find it hard to
    fund the use of transit to reach the other party.

    Simon

    -- 
    Simon Lockhart | * Sun Server Colocation * ADSL * Domain Registration *
       Director    |    * Domain & Web Hosting * Internet Consultancy * 
      Bogons Ltd   | * http://www.bogons.net/  *  Email:   * 
    

  • Next message: william(at)elan.net: "Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD