Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering

From: Alex Rubenstein (no email)
Date: Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:27:48 EDT

  • Next message: Patrick W. Gilmore: "Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering"

    Not to add fuel to the fire, but many IP contracts with my upstreams have
    a clause, which is very similar across vendors:

    "VENDOR cannot guarantee the peering sessions between our ourselves and
    other companies and/or networks. There is no guarantee of end to end
    connectivity between you as a CUSTOMER and other non-VENDOR controlled
    networks."

    While it actually has meaning now, I am not sure you'd get a vendor to
    delete that from an agreement.

    On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Matthew Crocker wrote:

    >
    >
    > On Oct 5, 2005, at 2:47 PM, Douglas Dever wrote:
    >
    >> On 10/5/05, Matthew Crocker <> wrote:
    >>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> They did, and I'm not down. I see Level 3 via Sprint and GNAPs/CENT
    >>> just fine. I didn't lose any connectivity to Level 3 at all. Bits
    >>> moving down different pipes, not a big deal to me technically. The
    >>>
    >>
    >> So, where's the problem, exactly?
    >
    > Um, I only have 2 routes to Level 3 when I should have 3 routes and I'm
    > paying for 3 routes...
    >
    >>
    >>
    >>> fact remains that Cogent is not providing the service I'm paying them
    >>> for and they need to get it fixed.
    >>>
    >>
    >> Really? As you already pointed out, your packets are reaching their
    >> destination. So, they don't "need" to get anything "fixed."
    >
    >
    > Ok, I *pay* Cogent for 'Direct Internet Access' which is IP Transit service.
    > I *cannot* get to part of the internet via Cogent right now. I also *pay*
    > Sprint and GNAPS for 'Direct Internet Access' and I can get to all parts of
    > the internet via their networks. I *used* to be triple redundant to *all*
    > of the Internet but now I only have *two* connections to Level 3. My
    > packets are reaching their destination because I'm smart enough to be
    > multi-homed, that doesn't remove the responsibility of Cogent to do what I
    > *pay them to do*. Cogent is *not* providing complete Internet access, I
    > really don't care who's fault it is.
    >
    >> What utter nonsense...
    >>
    >> *shakes head and walks away*
    >
    > Is it really that hard to understand?
    >
    > As a paying Cogent customer I expect to be able to get to the Internet
    > through them. Isn't that the business they are in?
    >
    >> -doug
    >>
    >
    > --
    > Matthew S. Crocker
    > Vice President
    > Crocker Communications, Inc.
    > Internet Division
    > PO BOX 710
    > Greenfield, MA 01302-0710
    > http://www.crocker.com
    >

    -- 
    Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, , latency, Al Reuben
    Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
    

  • Next message: Patrick W. Gilmore: "Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD