From: Patrick W. Gilmore (no email)
Date: Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:24:01 EDT
On Oct 5, 2005, at 2:04 PM, Todd Vierling wrote:
> No, I mean: Why didn't *your upstream's* routes fall back to
> *their* other
> peers, who should be perfectly capable of transiting those packets?
>
> The thinly veiled implication there is that "full mesh" is not a
> long term
> effective way to run the backbone level transit, because dropping
> one peer
> without an alternate path means that we get broken transit. Yum.
You are very, very confused on how the Internet works.
Which network do you run, sir? I find it useful to know which
networks have engineers who understand not only "conf t" but also
what the commands they type actually mean.
-- TTFN, patrick
|
|
|