North American Network Operators 0510
By Thread

Most recent messages
1233 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]

Starting: Sat Oct 01 2005 - 01:51:37 EDT
Ending: Mon Oct 31 2005 - 22:56:25 EST

• Re: IP Database Bruce Pinsky (Sat Oct 01 2005 - 01:50:24 EDT)
• Re: [Misc][Rant] Internet router (straying slightly OT) Petri Helenius (Sat Oct 01 2005 - 05:58:51 EDT)
  • Re: [Misc][Rant] Internet router (straying slightly OT) Patrick W. Gilmore (Mon Oct 03 2005 - 10:27:37 EDT)
• RE: IP Database Neil J. McRae (Sat Oct 01 2005 - 06:51:14 EDT)
  • RE: IP Database Chris Allermann (Sat Oct 01 2005 - 09:51:49 EDT)
• North American Shipping Clerks Group David W. Hankins (Sat Oct 01 2005 - 12:27:46 EDT)
• Re: .iq [ was: Re: Paul Vixie serving ORSN ] Matt Ghali (Sat Oct 01 2005 - 13:51:21 EDT)
• First step of network optimization Joe Shen (Sun Oct 02 2005 - 03:47:22 EDT)
  • Re: First step of network optimization (no name) (Sun Oct 02 2005 - 04:48:12 EDT)
  • Re: First step of network optimization Joe Shen (Sun Oct 02 2005 - 13:32:58 EDT)
• Fwd: Life of Brian, was Re: [Pr-plan] Public-Root resolution problems Frank Coluccio (Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:19:50 EDT)
• Apologies for earlier errant message Frank A. Coluccio (Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:53:10 EDT)
• Re: [eng/rtg] changing loopbacks David Barak (Sun Oct 02 2005 - 15:55:42 EDT)
  • Re: [eng/rtg] changing loopbacks Austin (Sun Oct 02 2005 - 16:16:30 EDT)
• Opinions on transit David Hubbard (Mon Oct 03 2005 - 15:42:05 EDT)
• (What If?) ccTLD Delegation Question Joe Johnson (Mon Oct 03 2005 - 17:28:29 EDT)
  • RE: (What If?) ccTLD Delegation Question Matthew Kaufman (Mon Oct 03 2005 - 17:35:14 EDT)
  • Re: (What If?) ccTLD Delegation Question Edward Lewis (Mon Oct 03 2005 - 17:36:22 EDT)
  • Re: (What If?) ccTLD Delegation Question Joel Jaeggli (Mon Oct 03 2005 - 17:39:13 EDT)
  • Re: (What If?) ccTLD Delegation Question Joe Abley (Mon Oct 03 2005 - 17:52:26 EDT)
    • Re: (What If?) ccTLD Delegation Question James Baldwin (Tue Oct 04 2005 - 10:40:45 EDT)
  • Re: (What If?) ccTLD Delegation Question JC Dill (Mon Oct 03 2005 - 19:06:48 EDT)
• Overview: (What If?) ccTLD Delegation Question Joe Johnson (Mon Oct 03 2005 - 18:13:16 EDT)
  • Re: Overview: (What If?) ccTLD Delegation Question James R. Cutler (Mon Oct 03 2005 - 18:30:30 EDT)
  • Re: Overview: (What If?) ccTLD Delegation Question Roland Perry (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 10:21:14 EDT)
  • Re: Overview: (What If?) ccTLD Delegation Question Roy Badami (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 11:38:03 EDT)
• The Internet is not scale-free Sean Donelan (Tue Oct 04 2005 - 11:26:36 EDT)
  • Re: The Internet is not scale-free (no name) (Tue Oct 04 2005 - 11:58:16 EDT)
• GigE Peering Router Network Lists (Tue Oct 04 2005 - 13:39:47 EDT)
  • RE: GigE Peering Router James Ashton (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 02:53:15 EDT)
    • Re: GigE Peering Router Patrick W.Gilmore (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 05:01:06 EDT)
• Charter Jeffrey Sharpe (Tue Oct 04 2005 - 13:51:13 EDT)
  • Re: Charter Randy Bush (Tue Oct 04 2005 - 13:54:34 EDT)
  • AT&T Bill Sehmel (Tue Oct 04 2005 - 15:02:07 EDT)
• TLD anycast clouds? Steve Gibbard (Tue Oct 04 2005 - 20:07:50 EDT)
  • Re: TLD anycast clouds? william(at)elan.net (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 02:54:03 EDT)
    • Re: TLD anycast clouds? Joe Abley (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 10:28:29 EDT)
  • Re: TLD anycast clouds? Elmar K. Bins (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 03:37:54 EDT)
  • Re: TLD anycast clouds? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 03:49:39 EDT)
  • Re: TLD anycast clouds? william(at)elan.net (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 03:54:36 EDT)
  • Re: TLD anycast clouds? Elmar K. Bins (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 04:00:52 EDT)
  • Re: TLD anycast clouds? william(at)elan.net (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 05:53:36 EDT)
    • Re: TLD anycast clouds? Joe Abley (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 10:29:52 EDT)
  • Re: TLD anycast clouds? Todd Vierling (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 11:14:41 EDT)
  • Re: TLD anycast clouds? Florian Weimer (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 11:33:14 EDT)
    • Re: TLD anycast clouds? Joe Abley (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 12:00:09 EDT)
  • Re: TLD anycast clouds? Steve Gibbard (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 14:19:08 EDT)
    • Re: TLD anycast clouds? John Payne (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:24:24 EDT)
• Cogent Dep(3)(3)ring Adam Rothschild (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 05:57:09 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent Dep(3)(3)ring Adam Rothschild (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 11:25:51 EDT)
• Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 06:01:15 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Vince Hoffman (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 11:29:52 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Matthew Crocker (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 11:50:52 EDT)
      • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 12:03:15 EDT)
      • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Matthew Crocker (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 13:13:00 EDT)
      • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:31:25 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Christopher Woodfield (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 12:26:33 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Simon Lockhart (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 11:57:00 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Joe Abley (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 12:08:34 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Matthew Crocker (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 13:06:51 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Mike Tancsa (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 12:00:40 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Jon Lewis (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 12:32:10 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Christopher Woodfield (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 12:38:43 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Todd Vierling (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 13:41:50 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Matthew Crocker (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 13:49:23 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering James Spenceley (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 14:08:26 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Jeff Shultz (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 13:43:51 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering John Payne (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:01:21 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Joe Abley (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:00:51 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Todd Vierling (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 14:04:36 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering John Payne (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 14:57:39 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:24:01 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 14:08:01 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard Irving (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 14:22:37 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Douglas Dever (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 14:47:28 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Matthew Crocker (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:02:41 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:22:05 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering James (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 14:58:08 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Douglas Dever (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 14:39:53 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering (no name) (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:08:00 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering David Sinn (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 17:17:09 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Mike Tancsa (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:00:45 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Senie (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 14:46:20 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Roesen (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:11:29 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:51:34 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering John Payne (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:48:01 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Micheal Patterson (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 16:11:54 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:22:55 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Jeff Shultz (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:22:25 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Joe Abley (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:51:57 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Mike Tancsa (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:12:49 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Alex Rubenstein (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:27:48 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Simon Lockhart (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:19:31 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering william(at)elan.net (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:46:10 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 16:14:52 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:36:04 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering JC Dill (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:52:10 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering James Spenceley (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 16:57:52 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Charles Gucker (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:44:10 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Lewis Butler (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 04:53:02 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Justin M. Streiner (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:46:12 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Jeff Shultz (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:35:18 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Micheal Patterson (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 17:12:01 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:51:23 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Justin M. Streiner (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:37:14 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering (no name) (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 16:04:09 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Golding (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 16:18:28 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Golding (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 16:13:57 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Roesen (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 16:40:00 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Pete Templin (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 16:57:54 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering John Curran (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 17:01:02 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Roesen (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 17:11:05 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 18:01:56 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Warren Kumari (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 16:50:51 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 17:01:41 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 18:18:59 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering John Payne (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 17:31:06 EDT)
  • RE: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Hannigan, Martin (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 17:32:52 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 17:51:50 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering andrew matthews (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 18:09:32 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Senie (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 17:59:22 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Todd Vierling (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 18:31:56 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Chris Stone (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 18:34:44 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Chris Stone (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 18:35:06 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 18:46:56 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Douglas Dever (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 18:39:43 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Alex Rubenstein (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 19:38:10 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering JC Dill (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 19:51:12 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering James (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 20:06:49 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Jeff Shultz (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 20:04:44 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 21:41:32 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering (no name) (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 22:25:49 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 22:41:15 EDT)
  • RE: Cogent/Level 3 depeering David Schwartz (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 22:27:24 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering (no name) (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 02:46:55 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Randy Bush (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 22:46:17 EDT)
  • RE: Cogent/Level 3 depeering John Curran (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 22:49:37 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Dave Stewart (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 23:21:38 EDT)
  • RE: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Hannigan, Martin (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 01:22:09 EDT)
  • RE: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Hannigan, Martin (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 01:27:48 EDT)
    • RE: Cogent/Level 3 depeering william(at)elan.net (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 02:15:58 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 01:41:07 EDT)
  • RE: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Hannigan, Martin (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 01:49:46 EDT)
  • RE: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Hannigan, Martin (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 02:39:32 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 02:47:35 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 13:59:01 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering tony sarendal (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 06:43:21 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering (no name) (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 07:00:36 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Mikael Abrahamsson (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 07:33:38 EDT)
  • Did we forget that ISP's are businesses? Leo Bicknell (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 08:29:14 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering David Barak (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 08:32:07 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Golding (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 09:11:58 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Golding (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 09:16:12 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Stephen J. Wilcox (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 10:02:33 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 10:11:26 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering tony sarendal (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 10:19:41 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 10:37:04 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Stephen J. Wilcox (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 10:29:13 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Randy Bush (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 10:30:53 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering tony sarendal (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 11:20:55 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 13:42:14 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 14:57:26 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 15:26:56 EDT)
  • RE: Cogent/Level 3 depeering David Schwartz (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 16:01:09 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Lamar Owen (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 18:36:00 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Leo Bicknell (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 20:07:24 EDT)
  • RE: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Schliesser, Benson (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 19:38:41 EDT)
    • RE: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Alex Rubenstein (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 19:47:58 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Joe Abley (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 22:37:14 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Deepak Jain (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 20:28:49 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Niels Bakker (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 20:32:39 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 23:42:50 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Deepak Jain (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 20:48:53 EDT)
  • RE: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Silver Tiger (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 01:17:18 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 01:29:06 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering JC Dill (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 01:54:37 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 03:17:53 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Mikael Abrahamsson (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 03:41:38 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Stephen J. Wilcox (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 04:52:33 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Stephen J. Wilcox (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 05:09:25 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Jay Adelson (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 09:32:46 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Joe Maimon (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 09:53:35 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Jay Adelson (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 10:13:03 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Lamar Owen (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 10:40:50 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Leo Bicknell (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 10:54:51 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Golding (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 11:29:56 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Golding (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 11:31:44 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering (no name) (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 11:33:01 EDT)
  • RE: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Schliesser, Benson (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 11:57:17 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering (no name) (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 12:51:02 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Charles Gucker (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 12:56:27 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 13:47:11 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Todd Vierling (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 13:37:40 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Senie (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 13:56:21 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering John Payne (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 13:48:30 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Paul Vixie (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 14:54:56 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Tony Li (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 23:22:32 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Paul Vixie (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 15:00:46 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Charles Gucker (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 15:49:34 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Tom Sands (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 16:12:20 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Stephen J. Wilcox (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 15:41:55 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering (no name) (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 23:23:51 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Paul Vixie (Sun Oct 09 2005 - 00:28:49 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Paul Vixie (Sun Oct 09 2005 - 00:32:22 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Stephen J. Wilcox (Sun Oct 09 2005 - 06:10:23 EDT)
• Is this data bogus? Vish Yelsangikar (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 10:57:59 EDT)
• AW: Cogent/Level 3 depeering John van Oppen (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 12:49:12 EDT)
  • Re: AW: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:40:08 EDT)
• Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) vijay gill (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 16:37:07 EDT)
  • Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Richard Irving (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 17:01:51 EDT)
  • Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Richard Irving (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 17:04:36 EDT)
  • Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) vijay gill (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 17:08:19 EDT)
  • Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) vijay gill (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 17:13:18 EDT)
  • Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Richard Irving (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 17:24:58 EDT)
  • Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Dorian Kim (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 17:24:10 EDT)
  • RE: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Sean Butler (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 17:46:14 EDT)
  • Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Richard Irving (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 19:38:23 EDT)
  • Fw: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) (no name) (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 06:58:24 EDT)
    • Re: Fw: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) JC Dill (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 14:36:19 EDT)
  • RE: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Schliesser, Benson (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 18:34:35 EDT)
  • Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Paul Vixie (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 19:01:19 EDT)
  • RE: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) (no name) (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 04:39:58 EDT)
  • RE: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Schliesser, Benson (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 12:54:25 EDT)
  • Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Paul Vixie (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 15:49:04 EDT)
• (de)peering (no name) (Wed Oct 05 2005 - 21:34:30 EDT)
  • Re: (de)peering Pekka Savola (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 01:51:13 EDT)
  • Re: (de)peering Robert E.Seastrom (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 08:43:32 EDT)
• Cogent/Level 3 drama, why it's the best news of the day! Peter Kranz (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 00:51:22 EDT)
• Re: Turkey has switched Root-Servers MÃ¥ns Nilsson (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 03:19:07 EDT)
  • Re: Turkey has switched Root-Servers Stephane Bortzmeyer (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 05:24:52 EDT)
  • Re: Turkey has switched Root-Servers Evren Demirkan (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 05:55:13 EDT)
• Fw: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) (no name) (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 06:54:34 EDT)
  • Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) John Kristoff (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 16:25:54 EDT)
    • Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Steven Champeon (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 17:07:33 EDT)
    • Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Joel Jaeggli (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 17:38:33 EDT)
    • Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Steven M. Bellovin (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 22:17:17 EDT)
    • Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) (no name) (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 05:14:14 EDT)
    • Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) John Levine (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 11:35:55 EDT)
• Re: Who is a Tier 1? (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) (no name) (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 06:59:37 EDT)
• Re: Banks and VCs (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) (no name) (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 07:02:23 EDT)
• RE: VoIP outage (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) (no name) (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 07:06:31 EDT)
• Re: Who is a Tier 1? J. Oquendo (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 07:14:43 EDT)
  • Re: Who is a Tier 1? Pekka Savola (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 07:21:36 EDT)
  • Re: Who is a Tier 1? (no name) (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 09:41:09 EDT)
• depeering season? Jon Lewis (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 09:46:07 EDT)
• Public Works Peering J. Oquendo (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 10:26:47 EDT)
  • mx error Randy Bush (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 10:34:45 EDT)
    • Re: mx error Christopher L. Morrow (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 11:15:36 EDT)
  • Re: Public Works Peering James Spenceley (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 10:46:23 EDT)
  • Re: Public Works Peering (no name) (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 10:49:22 EDT)
  • Re: Public Works Peering Erik Haagsman (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 10:45:20 EDT)
  • Re: Public Works Peering Steve Gibbard (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 15:06:36 EDT)
• New talks for LA Susan Harris (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 11:19:23 EDT)
• Regulatory intervention (Redux: Who is a Tier 1?) William Allen Simpson (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 11:56:27 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention (Redux: Who is a Tier 1?) Erik Haagsman (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 12:06:53 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention (Redux: Who is a Tier 1?) William Allen Simpson (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 12:44:41 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention (Redux: Who is a Tier 1?) William Allen Simpson (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 13:09:26 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention (Redux: Who is a Tier 1?) Patrick W. Gilmore (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 13:41:09 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention (Redux: Who is a Tier 1?) Niels Bakker (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 13:53:04 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention (Redux: Who is a Tier 1?) William Allen Simpson (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 14:51:06 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention (Redux: Who is a Tier 1?) Hank Nussbacher (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 15:17:05 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention (Redux: Who is a Tier 1?) Erik Haagsman (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 06:28:35 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention (Redux: Who is a Tier 1?) Erik Haagsman (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 06:55:15 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention (Redux: Who is a Tier 1?) William Allen Simpson (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 07:44:47 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention (Redux: Who is a Tier 1?) Erik Haagsman (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 08:30:20 EDT)
• Press Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering William Allen Simpson (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 12:08:50 EDT)
  • Re: Press Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering JC Dill (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 13:40:29 EDT)
• Contracts (was: Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Deepak Jain (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 16:52:18 EDT)
• MPLScon 2006 Call for Presentations Irwin Lazar (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 17:24:48 EDT)
• musings .... (no name) (Thu Oct 06 2005 - 20:33:19 EDT)
• The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 08:00:00 EDT)
• Cogent/Level 3 Contracts (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) William Allen Simpson (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 08:20:24 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 Contracts (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Stephen J. Wilcox (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 09:35:47 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 Contracts (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) (no name) (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 11:16:37 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 Contracts (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) William Allen Simpson (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 13:38:23 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 Contracts (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Stephen J. Wilcox (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 15:29:45 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 Contracts (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Stephen J. Wilcox (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 15:37:30 EDT)
• Re: Regulatory intervention (no name) (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 09:56:10 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention Tom Vest (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 10:17:03 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention Ross Hosman (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 11:02:16 EDT)
    • Re: Regulatory intervention Todd Vierling (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 11:21:13 EDT)
      • Re: Regulatory intervention Erik Haagsman (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 11:26:00 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention Erik Haagsman (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 11:07:15 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention Ross Hosman (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 11:26:13 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention Joel Rowbottom (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 11:49:46 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention Daniel Golding (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 12:51:35 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention Robert E.Seastrom (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 13:09:22 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention Owen DeLong (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 13:13:33 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention Sean Donelan (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 13:26:54 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention Todd Vierling (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 13:32:02 EDT)
    • Re: Regulatory intervention Erik Haagsman (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 13:25:54 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention (no name) (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 13:58:33 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention Henry Linneweh (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 14:14:10 EDT)
  • Re: Regulatory intervention (no name) (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 04:44:03 EDT)
• Cogent move without renumbering (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) William Allen Simpson (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 13:52:24 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent move without renumbering (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Henry Yen (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 16:26:04 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent move without renumbering (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Paul Vixie (Sun Oct 09 2005 - 00:22:56 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent move without renumbering (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Tony Li (Sun Oct 09 2005 - 03:50:45 EDT)
• Weekly Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 14:06:57 EDT)
• Re: Cogent move without renumbering William Allen Simpson (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 14:10:32 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent move without renumbering Paul Vixie (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 15:06:26 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent move without renumbering Albert Meyer (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 15:36:05 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent move without renumbering Bill Woodcock (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 16:55:45 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent move without renumbering Elmar K. Bins (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 17:43:23 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent move without renumbering William Allen Simpson (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 19:28:03 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent move without renumbering Randy Bush (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 21:39:18 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent move without renumbering William Allen Simpson (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 02:03:05 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent move without renumbering Randy Bush (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 02:39:27 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent move without renumbering William Allen Simpson (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 08:40:56 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent move without renumbering Patrick W. Gilmore (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 11:14:19 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent move without renumbering William Allen Simpson (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 13:58:27 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent move without renumbering Patrick W. Gilmore (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 16:43:54 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent move without renumbering Paul Vixie (Sun Oct 09 2005 - 00:17:45 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent move without renumbering William Allen Simpson (Sun Oct 09 2005 - 09:46:55 EDT)
• Re: Regulatory pros and cons J. Oquendo (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 14:34:57 EDT)
• RE: Cogent move without renumbering Hannigan, Martin (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 15:43:38 EDT)
  • RE: Cogent move without renumbering william(at)elan.net (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 15:53:32 EDT)
  • RE: Cogent move without renumbering Hannigan, Martin (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 16:49:11 EDT)
  • RE: Cogent move without renumbering Charles Cala (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 17:15:05 EDT)
  • RE: Cogent move without renumbering Hannigan, Martin (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 01:32:43 EDT)
• Free service offer by Cogent Jeffrey Sharpe (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 16:27:03 EDT)
  • RE: Free service offer by Cogent David Hubbard (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 16:33:09 EDT)
• Cogent depeering update Chris Stone (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 16:28:18 EDT)
• Some Cogent/L3 peering restored Chris Stone (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 16:40:47 EDT)
• Bell South backbone contact Peering (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 16:59:14 EDT)
• Level 3's side of the story Richard A Steenbergen (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 18:54:13 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story William Allen Simpson (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 19:13:45 EDT)
    • Re: Level 3's side of the story Patrick W. Gilmore (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 23:27:09 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story william(at)elan.net (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 19:23:44 EDT)
  • RE: Level 3's side of the story David Hubbard (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 19:26:18 EDT)
    • RE: Level 3's side of the story Jon Lewis (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 00:45:32 EDT)
      • Re: Level 3's side of the story Eric Louie (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 07:54:52 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story william(at)elan.net (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 19:41:14 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story James (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 20:47:45 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story Deepak Jain (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 21:14:48 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story John Curran (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 21:18:41 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story John Curran (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 22:42:26 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story John Curran (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 23:26:39 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story Ken Leland (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 23:36:57 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story Richard A Steenbergen (Fri Oct 07 2005 - 23:45:27 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story Kevin Loch (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 00:05:39 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story John Curran (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 00:25:59 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story Richard A Steenbergen (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 01:24:40 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story Richard A Steenbergen (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 01:27:41 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story Robert E.Seastrom (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 08:49:03 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story JC Dill (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 10:24:06 EDT)
    • Re: Level 3's side of the story Leo Bicknell (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 12:41:21 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story James (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 10:24:22 EDT)
    • Re: Level 3's side of the story Matthew Crocker (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 15:10:03 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story John Curran (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 11:42:40 EDT)
    • Re: Level 3's side of the story Patrick W. Gilmore (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 12:13:13 EDT)
  • RE: Level 3's side of the story Rik van Riel (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 12:41:07 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story Richard A Steenbergen (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 15:07:13 EDT)
    • Re: Level 3's side of the story Patrick W. Gilmore (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 16:37:29 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story Stephen J. Wilcox (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 16:16:25 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story Richard A Steenbergen (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 16:45:01 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story Stephen J. Wilcox (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 16:58:55 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story Richard A Steenbergen (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 17:05:29 EDT)
    • Re: Level 3's side of the story Patrick W. Gilmore (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 19:19:49 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story Will Yardley (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 17:21:17 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story John Curran (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 18:43:16 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story Michael Loftis (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 19:20:24 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story John Curran (Sun Oct 09 2005 - 08:39:18 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story (no name) (Sun Oct 09 2005 - 10:46:57 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story Simon Leinen (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 10:04:53 EDT)
  • Re: Level 3's side of the story Daniel Karrenberg (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 04:38:49 EDT)
• RE: Cogent/Level 3 depeering (philosophical solution) David Schwartz (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 07:02:00 EDT)
  • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering (philosophical solution) Patrick W. Gilmore (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 11:10:26 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering (philosophical solution) Paul Vixie (Sun Oct 09 2005 - 23:27:09 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering (philosophical solution) William B. Norton (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 13:05:18 EDT)
    • Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering (philosophical solution) Paul Vixie (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 19:43:06 EDT)
  • RE: Cogent/Level 3 depeering (philosophical solution) David Schwartz (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 12:26:22 EDT)
• DNS question (no name) (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 13:26:29 EDT)
  • Re: DNS question Randy Bush (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 16:01:01 EDT)
    • Re: DNS question Joe Abley (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 20:45:32 EDT)
• Too much on Cogent and Level 3 Steven M. Bellovin (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 17:16:08 EDT)
  • Re: Too much on Cogent and Level 3 Gadi Evron (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 18:42:12 EDT)
  • Re: Too much on Cogent and Level 3 (no name) (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 07:29:05 EDT)
• Sorry to butt in - Google operational Eric Germann (Sat Oct 08 2005 - 17:55:00 EDT)
• OT: Connection restored between feuding Net providers Cogent/L3 Henry Linneweh (Sun Oct 09 2005 - 03:30:29 EDT)
  • Re: OT: Connection restored between feuding Net providers Cogent/L3 Stephen J. Wilcox (Sun Oct 09 2005 - 06:06:47 EDT)
• How to multihome endusers [was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering] Peter Dambier (Sun Oct 09 2005 - 06:52:37 EDT)
  • Re: How to multihome endusers [was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering] william(at)elan.net (Sun Oct 09 2005 - 15:36:11 EDT)
  • Re: How to multihome endusers [was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering] Christopher L. Morrow (Sun Oct 09 2005 - 15:40:42 EDT)
• Operational impact of depeering (no name) (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 09:28:01 EDT)
  • Re: Operational impact of depeering Tom Vest (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 09:46:21 EDT)
  • RE: Operational impact of depeering Hannigan, Martin (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 11:02:08 EDT)
    • Re: Operational impact of depeering Tom Vest (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 14:09:16 EDT)
  • Re: Operational impact of depeering Todd Underwood (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 11:25:07 EDT)
  • Re: Operational impact of depeering Robert E.Seastrom (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 12:15:54 EDT)
• Fwd: The Root has got an A record Peter Dambier (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 11:03:17 EDT)
  • Re: Fwd: The Root has got an A record Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 11:11:04 EDT)
  • Re: Fwd: The Root has got an A record Janet Sullivan (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 11:25:04 EDT)
  • Re: Fwd: The Root has got an A record Joe Blanchard (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 11:30:37 EDT)
  • Re: Fwd: The Root has got an A record Jon Lewis (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 11:51:54 EDT)
  • Re: Fwd: The Root has got an A record Janet Sullivan (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 11:55:43 EDT)
    • Re: Fwd: The Root has got an A record Peter (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 12:21:12 EDT)
  • Re: Fwd: The Root has got an A record (no name) (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 12:33:03 EDT)
  • Re: Fwd: The Root has got an A record Peter Dambier (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 12:31:51 EDT)
  • Re: Fwd: The Root has got an A record Jon Lewis (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 13:02:15 EDT)
  • Re: Fwd: The Root has got an A record Todd Vierling (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 16:23:35 EDT)
  • Re: Fwd: The Root has got an A record Peter Dambier (Tue Oct 11 2005 - 04:32:20 EDT)
  • Re: Fwd: The Root has got an A record Andre Oppermann (Tue Oct 11 2005 - 05:14:59 EDT)
  • Re: Fwd: The Root has got an A record (no name) (Tue Oct 11 2005 - 05:33:25 EDT)
  • Re: Fwd: The Root has got an A record Bill Stewart (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 22:14:03 EDT)
• I have an A record. J.D. Falk (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 12:11:12 EDT)
• Renesys Routing Report of Level3/Cogent Chris Malayter (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 12:20:59 EDT)
  • Re: Renesys Routing Report of Level3/Cogent Ross Hosman (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 12:28:52 EDT)
  • RE: Renesys Routing Report of Level3/Cogent James Ashton (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 12:57:43 EDT)
• Cox Communications Contact Please Richard J. Sears (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 14:24:43 EDT)
• LAX to NANOG 35 - bus/shuttle recommendations? Pete Templin (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 16:23:19 EDT)
  • Re: LAX to NANOG 35 - bus/shuttle recommendations? Rodney Joffe (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 16:35:51 EDT)
• OT: Anyone here know what's up with inet-access.net W.D.McKinney (Mon Oct 10 2005 - 22:30:31 EDT)
• It's only a flesh wound (was Re: OT: Anyone here know what's up with inet-access.net) JC Dill (Tue Oct 11 2005 - 03:04:17 EDT)
• Problems Philip Lavine (Tue Oct 11 2005 - 10:37:15 EDT)
  • Re: Problems Sabri Berisha (Tue Oct 11 2005 - 10:59:21 EDT)
  • Re: Problems Matthew Crocker (Tue Oct 11 2005 - 11:10:28 EDT)
  • Re: Problems Richard A Steenbergen (Tue Oct 11 2005 - 11:51:27 EDT)
  • Re: Problems Richard A Steenbergen (Tue Oct 11 2005 - 18:15:32 EDT)
• Requesting P.I. Space from ARIN - latest issues? (no name) (Tue Oct 11 2005 - 10:11:24 EDT)
  • Re: Requesting P.I. Space from ARIN - latest issues? Justin M. Streiner (Tue Oct 11 2005 - 11:33:34 EDT)
    • Re: Requesting P.I. Space from ARIN - latest issues? Joe Abley (Tue Oct 11 2005 - 11:59:58 EDT)
• SNMP "Accounting" Software Drew Weaver (Tue Oct 11 2005 - 12:20:58 EDT)
  • RE: SNMP "Accounting" Software McNamara, Colin (Tue Oct 11 2005 - 12:32:36 EDT)
  • RE: SNMP "Accounting" Software Erik Haagsman (Tue Oct 11 2005 - 12:28:17 EDT)
  • RE: SNMP "Accounting" Software Chad Skidmore (Tue Oct 11 2005 - 12:53:48 EDT)
  • Re: SNMP "Accounting" Software Alex Rubenstein (Tue Oct 11 2005 - 13:53:31 EDT)
  • Re: SNMP "Accounting" Software Ross Hosman (Tue Oct 11 2005 - 14:27:21 EDT)
  • RE: SNMP "Accounting" Software Chad Skidmore (Tue Oct 11 2005 - 20:51:52 EDT)
• NANOG Program Committee announcement Steve Feldman (Tue Oct 11 2005 - 20:24:12 EDT)
• Another Program Committee change Steve Feldman (Tue Oct 11 2005 - 20:40:59 EDT)
• VPLS Experience danazster (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 01:01:15 EDT)
  • Re: VPLS Experience danazster (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 03:19:33 EDT)
• IPv6 news Steven M. Bellovin (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 10:33:42 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Colm MacCarthaigh (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 10:53:35 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 14:49:14 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 15:13:12 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Fred Baker (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 19:50:26 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Peter Lothberg (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 14:05:58 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news Jeroen Massar (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 14:23:03 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 14:42:10 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news Mark Prior (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 07:06:29 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Daniel Golding (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 15:20:31 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news william(at)elan.net (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 15:36:33 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Brandon Ross (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 15:37:15 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 04:51:37 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news Brandon Ross (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 10:03:22 EDT)
      • Reallocation of IPv4 space (was Re: IPv6 news) Etaoin Shrdlu (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 10:57:29 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Richard A Steenbergen (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 16:38:53 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Todd Underwood (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 17:06:33 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 17:13:12 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Daniel Roesen (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 17:16:03 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 17:30:30 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Florian Weimer (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 17:43:03 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Sean Figgins (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 17:56:05 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 19:41:21 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 19:41:26 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Daniel Roesen (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 19:49:37 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Joel Jaeggli (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 19:50:56 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 20:00:07 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news K. Scott Bethke (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 20:25:05 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news Michael Greb (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 16:16:07 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 20:01:16 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 20:39:31 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news william(at)elan.net (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 20:48:53 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Kevin Loch (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 22:10:36 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Stephen Sprunk (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 14:47:42 EDT)
      • Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border (was Re: IPv6 news) Todd Vierling (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 18:06:03 EDT)
      • Re: Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border (was Re: IPv6 news) Daniel Roesen (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 18:31:45 EDT)
      • Re: Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border (was Re: IPv6 news) Todd Vierling (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 22:45:33 EDT)
      • Re: Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border (was Re: IPv6 news) Daniel Roesen (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 23:20:46 EDT)
      • Re: Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border (was Re: IPv6 news) Nicholas Suan (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 01:22:15 EDT)
      • Re: Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border (was Re: IPv6 news) Bernhard Schmidt (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 09:13:22 EDT)
      • Re: Deploying 6to4 outbound routes at the border (was Re: IPv6 news) Marshall Eubanks (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 14:09:48 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 04:54:23 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Sean Figgins (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 23:56:27 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Stephen Sprunk (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 14:33:09 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Sean Figgins (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 00:07:31 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 02:45:30 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 02:57:18 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 03:20:30 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 04:42:56 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Brandon Ross (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 09:56:07 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 11:03:20 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news Bjørn Mork (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 07:06:30 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news Geoff Huston (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 02:39:39 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 05:02:23 EDT)
  • RE: IPv6 news Church, Chuck (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 10:15:46 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Crist Clark (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 12:28:19 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 12:29:56 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 12:59:59 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 15:23:56 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 15:26:12 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 15:38:34 EDT)
  • RE: IPv6 news K. Scott Bethke (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 16:30:18 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 16:39:22 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 18:55:09 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Steven M. Bellovin (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 20:13:20 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 20:17:28 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 20:32:29 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 20:47:27 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Mike Leber (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 23:31:45 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Stephen Sprunk (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 12:37:57 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news Mike Leber (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 18:54:19 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news Michael Greb (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 23:28:27 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Jeroen Massar (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 02:41:27 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Daniel Roesen (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 04:21:47 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 05:29:39 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 05:46:06 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 05:52:50 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Sam Hayes Merritt, III (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 11:45:14 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Sabri Berisha (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 09:13:44 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Paul Vixie (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 09:48:32 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 10:13:22 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Joe Abley (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 10:57:59 EDT)
      • shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) David Conrad (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 14:48:28 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Owen DeLong (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 15:16:22 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Joe Abley (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 15:25:06 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Joe Abley (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 15:19:27 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) (no name) (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 15:27:37 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) william(at)elan.net (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 15:33:51 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) John Payne (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 23:50:26 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Daniel Roesen (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 15:39:58 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) (no name) (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 15:42:31 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) (no name) (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 15:48:09 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Crist Clark (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 16:11:18 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Daniel Roesen (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 16:31:36 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) David Meyer (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 16:40:31 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Paul Vixie (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 16:48:55 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) David Conrad (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 02:03:57 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Paul Vixie (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 10:14:06 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Crist Clark (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 17:20:21 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) william(at)elan.net (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 18:07:06 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 23:47:42 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Christopher L. Morrow (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 00:32:28 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) David Conrad (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 00:52:29 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Christopher L. Morrow (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 11:58:56 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Pekka Savola (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 02:01:47 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Bill Woodcock (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 12:03:00 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Tony Li (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 12:44:08 EDT)
      • Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Bill Woodcock (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 12:43:16 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news John Payne (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 23:22:00 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 10:17:36 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Marshall Eubanks (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 10:17:51 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Jared Mauch (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 10:34:17 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Sabri Berisha (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 10:34:19 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Jared Mauch (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 10:39:57 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Jeroen Massar (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 11:18:10 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Daniel Roesen (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 11:27:06 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Joe Abley (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 11:50:33 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Daniel Roesen (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 12:10:50 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news John Payne (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 23:42:06 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 15:29:02 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news Joe Abley (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 16:03:33 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news John Payne (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 17:23:12 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 18:27:01 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news David Conrad (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 20:49:59 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Marshall Eubanks (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 12:13:17 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 14:16:56 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Joseph S D Yao (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 17:37:27 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Mike Leber (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 17:38:48 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 23:27:45 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Joseph S D Yao (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 18:04:16 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 23:03:32 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 23:09:36 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 23:15:45 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 00:52:19 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Chris Adams (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 23:21:58 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 23:31:12 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 23:34:21 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Daniel Roesen (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 23:40:05 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Daniel Roesen (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 23:46:54 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Chris Adams (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 00:10:59 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 03:32:23 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Daniel Roesen (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 04:44:39 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 15:58:39 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 05:09:18 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 05:28:42 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Brandon Butterworth (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 07:58:29 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 11:22:49 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 11:40:44 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 11:53:07 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 12:07:45 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 15:24:34 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Jared Mauch (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 12:08:40 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 22:19:54 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 02:36:24 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Paul Vixie (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 00:08:26 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news David Conrad (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 01:40:53 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 02:26:20 EDT)
      • And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) David Conrad (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 03:37:12 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Mark Smith (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 04:02:47 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Tony Li (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 04:17:38 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Tony Li (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 04:15:28 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) David Conrad (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 12:10:41 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Tony Li (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 16:56:17 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) David Conrad (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 18:52:13 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Joe Maimon (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 04:28:57 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Tony Li (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 04:50:53 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Mike Leber (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 05:07:31 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Joe Maimon (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 05:23:52 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Joe Maimon (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 05:31:23 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Mike Leber (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 06:23:24 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Mikael Abrahamsson (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 07:06:02 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Paul Vixie (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 13:38:26 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Brandon Butterworth (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 08:06:35 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) John Reilly (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 10:26:02 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) John Reilly (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 13:58:36 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Joe Abley (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 10:55:38 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Randy Bush (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 13:21:51 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Paul Vixie (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 13:28:17 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) (no name) (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 16:20:51 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Joe Abley (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 18:00:57 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Christopher L. Morrow (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 00:34:45 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Mikael Abrahamsson (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 01:17:15 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Christopher L. Morrow (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 01:53:50 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Per Heldal (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 06:30:31 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Mikael Abrahamsson (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 06:55:20 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Paul Jakma (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 07:36:38 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Tony Li (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 12:46:51 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Per Heldal (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 09:35:30 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Mikael Abrahamsson (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 09:47:01 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Fred Baker (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 10:25:50 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Per Heldal (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 12:20:09 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Fred Baker (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 14:29:50 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Randy Bush (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 15:03:45 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Peter Dambier (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 13:16:34 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Per Heldal (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 14:46:16 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Per Heldal (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 14:53:26 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) (no name) (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 15:22:52 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Per Heldal (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 15:42:43 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Fred Baker (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 16:12:04 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Tony Li (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 16:51:25 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Fred Baker (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 17:03:47 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Stephen Sprunk (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 20:34:17 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Stephen Sprunk (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 20:44:33 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) (no name) (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 21:25:42 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) (no name) (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 05:26:11 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Stephen Sprunk (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 16:49:52 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) (no name) (Wed Oct 19 2005 - 04:43:27 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Randy Bush (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 16:01:52 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Randy Bush (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 16:02:43 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Daniel Golding (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 16:57:57 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Per Heldal (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 17:06:56 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Fred Baker (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 17:43:16 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Randy Bush (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 17:17:48 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Randy Bush (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 17:16:48 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Alexei Roudnev (Mon Oct 24 2005 - 02:41:36 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Daniel Senie (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 17:23:47 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Tony Li (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 17:05:12 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Tony Li (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 17:24:08 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Fred Baker (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 17:58:37 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Gordon Cook (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 19:16:55 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Tony Li (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 21:32:44 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Marshall Eubanks (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 18:55:42 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Paul Vixie (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 22:09:36 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Paul Jakma (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 01:36:37 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Tony Li (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 02:23:00 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Paul Vixie (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 09:33:27 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Paul Jakma (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 01:45:21 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) (no name) (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 05:19:30 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) (no name) (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 10:41:24 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Elmar K. Bins (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 12:41:20 EDT)
      • RE: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Church, Chuck (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 13:40:40 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Fred Baker (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 15:44:57 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Gary E. Miller (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 16:42:03 EDT)
      • Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news) Per Heldal (Wed Oct 19 2005 - 06:25:48 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news Paul Vixie (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 10:35:13 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news David Conrad (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 01:02:40 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Mike Leber (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 01:11:03 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Mark Smith (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 03:27:45 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Tony Li (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 04:45:40 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news David Meyer (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 10:57:52 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 03:57:38 EDT)
  • RE: IPv6 news Scott Morris (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 08:06:27 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Paul Vixie (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 13:03:54 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news John Reilly (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 10:27:03 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Joe Abley (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 11:08:13 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news Joe Abley (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 18:02:49 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Susan Harris (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 10:38:50 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news John Reilly (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 13:21:52 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 18:29:08 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 22:52:12 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Sun Oct 16 2005 - 23:01:50 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Kevin Loch (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 05:25:40 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 06:12:36 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 06:39:37 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Gary E. Miller (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 12:56:07 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Gregory Edigarov (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 06:42:42 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Alexei Roudnev (Mon Oct 24 2005 - 02:58:40 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mon Oct 24 2005 - 03:04:41 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 07:08:38 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 07:42:15 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Simon Lyall (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 08:07:55 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 07:51:41 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 07:58:40 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Jeroen Massar (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 08:18:47 EDT)
    • Re: non-provider aggregation, was: IPv6 news Iljitsch van Beijnum (Wed Oct 19 2005 - 17:40:52 EDT)
      • Re: non-provider aggregation, was: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Wed Oct 19 2005 - 21:00:05 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Jeroen Massar (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 08:22:49 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 09:17:43 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news David Conrad (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 11:42:56 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 09:36:50 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 09:57:18 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 10:05:05 EDT)
    • geo-based routing [Re: IPv6 news] Pekka Savola (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 02:32:35 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Per Heldal (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 10:07:47 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 10:15:21 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 13:29:16 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Mark Smith (Mon Oct 17 2005 - 17:45:13 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 01:51:00 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Phillip Vandry (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 03:18:19 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 04:49:19 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 05:06:30 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news william(at)elan.net (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 05:15:17 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 05:29:15 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 05:49:36 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 07:26:30 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 07:55:01 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 08:36:28 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 09:31:08 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Marshall Eubanks (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 09:49:08 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 10:07:02 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 10:17:03 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 10:22:26 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 10:24:21 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 10:33:07 EDT)
  • RE: IPv6 news Hannigan, Martin (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 10:39:51 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 10:46:04 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 10:44:48 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 10:49:04 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 11:02:42 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 11:04:45 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 11:12:40 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 11:11:23 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 11:27:25 EDT)
  • RE: IPv6 news Hannigan, Martin (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 11:29:02 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 11:48:42 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news John Dupuy (Tue Oct 18 2005 - 12:37:06 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Wed Oct 19 2005 - 06:20:03 EDT)
    • Re: IPv6 news Todd Vierling (Wed Oct 19 2005 - 07:43:43 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Wed Oct 19 2005 - 09:39:33 EDT)
      • Re: IPv6 news Tom Vest (Wed Oct 19 2005 - 10:21:20 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news (no name) (Mon Oct 24 2005 - 06:52:59 EDT)
• Re: IPv6 news [global crossing] Pekka Savola (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 15:00:23 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 news [global crossing] Richard A Steenbergen (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 15:20:25 EDT)
• whois.register.com - exceeded maximum number of queries? Erik Sundberg (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 17:57:39 EDT)
  • RE: whois.register.com - exceeded maximum number of queries? Erik Sundberg (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 18:08:31 EDT)
  • Re: whois.register.com - exceeded maximum number of queries? Jim Popovitch (Wed Oct 12 2005 - 18:56:40 EDT)
• Bittorrent on v6 [Re: IPv6 news] Pekka Savola (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 00:03:49 EDT)
• [Opinion] Re: IPv6 news James R. Cutler (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 12:54:30 EDT)
• SONET MUX Erik Sundberg (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 13:13:11 EDT)
  • RE: SONET MUX Wallace Keith (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 13:26:35 EDT)
  • RE: SONET MUX Hannigan, Martin (Sat Oct 15 2005 - 18:04:12 EDT)
• IPv6 and BGP Mike Hyde (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 14:32:32 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 and BGP Kevin Loch (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 14:45:34 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 and BGP Marshall Eubanks (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 15:26:47 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 and BGP Stephane Bortzmeyer (Fri Oct 14 2005 - 03:51:59 EDT)
• Bad IPv6 connectivity or why not to announce more specifics (Was: IPv6 news) Jeroen Massar (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 15:06:30 EDT)
  • Re: Bad IPv6 connectivity or why not to announce more specifics (Was: IPv6 news) (no name) (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 15:38:38 EDT)
  • Re: Bad IPv6 connectivity or why not to announce more specifics (Was: IPv6 news) Jeroen Massar (Thu Oct 13 2005 - 15:44:23 EDT)
  • Re: Bad IPv6 connectivity or why not to announce more specifics (Was: IPv6 news)