Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming zombies

From: Patrick W. Gilmore (no email)
Date: Wed Jun 01 2005 - 13:52:20 EDT

  • Next message: Christopher L. Morrow: "Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming zombies (was: Re: VerizonWireless.com Mail Blacklists)"

    On Jun 1, 2005, at 12:51 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:

    >> If the ISP wants to use SMTP AUTH or other mechanisms to lower abuse,
    >> that's fine. But to say "only allow ISP.net from addresses - but
    >> allow
    >> them from anywhere on the 'Net" is kinda ... silly.
    >>
    >
    > No, it makes perfect sense but that is the one thing I fear we'll have
    > to agree to disagree on.

    I fear you will have to agree to disagree with just about anyone who
    runs a large mail server.

    >> The solution presented here is not only not a solution, it is also a
    >> problem.
    >>
    >
    > Okay, then I suppose I don't understand the problem. How exactly do
    > you
    > mean?

    1) It is not a solution because it does not stop spam. In fact, it
    is easier to send spam through VZ's mail servers than just about
    anyone else's.

    2) It is a problem because they do not allow things almost every
    other ISP does - things which are "standard" and things for which the
    anti-spam community has been fighting to put in place for many years.

    -- 
    TTFN,
    patrick
    

  • Next message: Christopher L. Morrow: "Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming zombies (was: Re: VerizonWireless.com Mail Blacklists)"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD