From: Hannigan, Martin (no email)
Date: Wed Jun 01 2005 - 09:27:47 EDT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [mailto:]On Behalf Of
> Owen DeLong
> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 1:31 AM
> To: Jason Frisvold; Fergie (Paul Ferguson)
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: Administration Asks Appeals Court To Compel ISP Searches
>
>
[ SNIP ]
> I have never seen an NSL and have never received one.
IANAL, and I haven't seen one post yet, so I'd suggest
that if anyone has a question on the process or how it
affects them, _they contact a real lawyer_.
Latest publicly available NSL:
http://www.aclu.org/nsl/legal/NSL_formletter_080404.pdf
Latest FBI Memo on authority and filling out an NSL:
http://www.aclu.org/patriot_foia/FOIA/Nov2001FBImemo.pdf
Summary: Subpoena like, still requires internal approval,
not part of FISA, but statutory authority under the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
Myth: Wiretap means voice surveillance. It insinuates it, but
voice intercept is least used out of the CALEA punclist, believe
it or not. Wiretap is used as a descriptor for all.
-M<
|
|
|