North American Network Operators 0504
By Date

Most recent messages
1158 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]

Starting: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 01:08:17 EST
Ending: Sat Apr 30 2005 - 23:34:51 EDT

• Re: Telcordia report on ICANN .net RFP Evaluation Dave Crocker (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 01:07:16 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Mikael Abrahamsson (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 01:34:41 EST)
• Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Elmar K. Bins (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 03:15:03 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Eric A. Hall (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 03:35:47 EST)
• Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance (no name) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 05:33:38 EST)
• P2P Usage Increases was: (Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance) (no name) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 05:57:28 EST)
• Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Florian Weimer (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 06:02:19 EST)
• P2P Usage Increases was: (Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance) Andrew Odlyzko (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 06:22:11 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (no name) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 06:34:13 EST)
• The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 07:00:00 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Niels Bakker (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 07:11:45 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) David Barak (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 07:11:47 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (no name) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 07:58:39 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Niels Bakker (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 08:02:56 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Robert Bonomi (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 08:18:54 EST)
• Re: Telcordia report on ICANN .net RFP Evaluation Patrick W Gilmore (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 08:48:55 EST)
• RFC 4041 Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 09:21:54 EST)
• Re: RFC 4041 william(at)elan.net (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 09:44:08 EST)
• Positioning technology Roy (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 09:45:44 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Paul Vixie (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 10:08:42 EST)
• Re: Telcordia report on ICANN .net RFP Evaluation Edward Lewis (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 10:22:12 EST)
• Re: outage/maintenance window opinion Jay R. Ashworth (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 11:31:38 EST)
• Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Jay R. Ashworth (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 11:42:25 EST)
• Cisco to merge with Nabisco Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 11:45:17 EST)
• Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Robert Boyle (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 11:55:56 EST)
• Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Stephen Sprunk (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:03:23 EST)
• Re: Positioning technology Joel Jaeggli (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:15:46 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Adi Linden (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:22:37 EST)
• Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Bill Nash (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:28:01 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Bill Nash (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:30:19 EST)
• Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Bill Nash (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:33:16 EST)
• Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Adi Linden (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:30:56 EST)
• Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Bill Woodcock (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:33:56 EST)
• RE: RFC 4041 Howard, W. Lee (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:37:13 EST)
• Re: Telcordia report on ICANN .net RFP Evaluation Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:32:14 EST)
• RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Dave Hilton (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:44:08 EST)
• Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Robert Bonomi (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:51:13 EST)
• RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Church, Chuck (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:54:08 EST)
• .net report slammed again Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:53:14 EST)
• Re: Telcordia report on ICANN .net RFP Evaluation Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:54:03 EST)
• RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Bill Nash (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:09:12 EST)
• RE: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Alexander Kiwerski (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:05:33 EST)
• Weekly Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:10:30 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) David Barak (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:12:00 EST)
• RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Robert Boyle (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:13:28 EST)
• RE: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Alex Bligh (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:15:03 EST)
• RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Dave Hilton (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:15:55 EST)
• Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Randy Bush (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:31:06 EST)
• Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco bob (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:47:36 EST)
• Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (no name) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:42:37 EST)
• Re: Positioning technology Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:47:43 EST)
• Re: Positioning technology Roy (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:57:54 EST)
• Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Steve Sobol (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:03:24 EST)
• Community Experiences with the InterNIC Whois Data Problem Reports Sys tem Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:04:00 EST)
• Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Richard Cox (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:18:38 EST)
• Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Michael Moscovitch (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:27:13 EST)
• qwest packet drops? Wyatt Smiarli, Esq. (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:33:26 EST)
• RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Church, Chuck (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:35:11 EST)
• Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco) Bill Woodcock (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:45:16 EST)
• RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Andy Grosser (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:51:27 EST)
• Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Robert Bonomi (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:50:29 EST)
• Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco) Randy Bush (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:55:43 EST)
• Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco) Bill Nash (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:05:34 EST)
• RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Ejay Hire (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:59:49 EST)
• Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco) Joe Provo (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:02:06 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) just me (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:03:17 EST)
• RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Jay Hennigan (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:14:52 EST)
• Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Jay R. Ashworth (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:31:26 EST)
• Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco) Jay R. Ashworth (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:39:55 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Owen DeLong (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:45:07 EST)
• Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors Jay R. Ashworth (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:46:41 EST)
• Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Jay R. Ashworth (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:53:55 EST)
• Re: Positioning technology Joel Jaeggli (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:58:02 EST)
• Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco) John Kristoff (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:00:22 EST)
• Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco) Randy Bush (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:08:17 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Jay R. Ashworth (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:10:16 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Jay R. Ashworth (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:19:59 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Jay R. Ashworth (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:29:33 EST)
• Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Wayne E. Bouchard (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:34:12 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Jay R. Ashworth (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:15:22 EST)
• Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Wayne E. Bouchard (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:37:18 EST)
• Re: Positioning technology Robert M. Enger (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:40:09 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Paul Vixie (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:54:40 EST)
• Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance David Barak (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:58:07 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Randy Bush (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 17:00:56 EST)
• cable management systems Justin M. Streiner (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 17:17:32 EST)
• Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Kevin Oberman (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 17:09:08 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Dan Hollis (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 17:11:57 EST)
• Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Kevin Oberman (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 17:13:53 EST)
• Re: Positioning technology Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 17:18:49 EST)
• RE: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Owen DeLong (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 18:26:43 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Stephen Sprunk (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 18:32:29 EST)
• Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Stephen Sprunk (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 18:32:22 EST)
• Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Owen DeLong (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 19:08:08 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Owen DeLong (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 19:09:36 EST)
• RE: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Hannigan, Martin (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 19:44:20 EST)
• Peribit "sequence reducers" -- do they worth the investment? MARLON BORBA (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 21:08:29 EST)
• Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Elmar K. Bins (Sat Apr 02 2005 - 06:48:51 EST)
• Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Daniel Roesen (Sat Apr 02 2005 - 07:29:34 EST)
• Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco) Randy Bush (Sat Apr 02 2005 - 10:13:04 EST)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Peter Corlett (Sat Apr 02 2005 - 10:44:09 EST)
• RE: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Hannigan, Martin (Sun Apr 03 2005 - 13:48:02 EDT)
• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) Jay R. Ashworth (Sun Apr 03 2005 - 15:00:07 EDT)
• Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Jay R. Ashworth (Sun Apr 03 2005 - 15:07:13 EDT)
• Reminder: NANOG 34 proposals due Monday, April 4 Steve Feldman (Sun Apr 03 2005 - 22:34:35 EDT)
• Anyone from btnaccess.com on the list please ping me? Drew Weaver (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 00:46:54 EDT)
• RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Pendergrass, Greg (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 06:01:03 EDT)
• RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Pendergrass, Greg (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 06:05:02 EDT)
• Re: botted hosts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 08:13:33 EDT)
• Re: botted hosts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 08:18:15 EDT)
• Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco Richard Irving (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 10:03:41 EDT)
• Re: report of .biz outage... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 10:03:55 EDT)
• Re: report of .biz outage... Edward Lewis (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 10:58:53 EDT)
• Re: report of .biz outage... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 11:00:45 EDT)
• Re: botted hosts Christopher L. Morrow (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 11:27:02 EDT)
• Re: report of .biz outage... Bill Woodcock (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 11:28:00 EDT)
• Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts] Petri Helenius (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 14:24:16 EDT)
• Re: botted hosts Petri Helenius (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 14:44:45 EDT)
• Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts] Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 15:09:34 EDT)
• Re: botted hosts Florian Weimer (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:01:38 EDT)
• Re: botted hosts Christopher L. Morrow (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:08:51 EDT)
• Re: botted hosts (no name) (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:12:47 EDT)
• Re: botted hosts Dean Anderson (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:16:42 EDT)
• Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? Florian Weimer (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:21:49 EDT)
• Re: botted hosts (no name) (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:33:29 EDT)
• Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? Florian Weimer (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:41:55 EDT)
• Re: botted hosts John Dupuy (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:45:01 EDT)
• Re: botted hosts Florian Weimer (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:48:46 EDT)
• Re: botted hosts Florian Weimer (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:46:36 EDT)
• Re: botted hosts Sam Hayes Merritt, III (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:56:10 EDT)
• Re: botted hosts Peter Corlett (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 17:48:37 EDT)
• Re: botted hosts Florian Weimer (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 18:36:37 EDT)
• Re: botted hosts Dean Anderson (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 19:14:26 EDT)
• The Register: .NET report was fudged Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 19:21:12 EDT)
• Reports or data on data centres without access to competitive fibre Stephen Baxter (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 20:43:12 EDT)
• Re: botted hosts Christopher L. Morrow (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 23:16:29 EDT)
• Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Simon Waters (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 05:22:34 EDT)
• Re: Reports or data on data centres without access to competitive fibre Alex Bligh (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 05:28:33 EDT)
• Re: botted hosts Simon Waters (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 05:35:01 EDT)
• Re: botted hosts Simon Waters (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 05:37:44 EDT)
• Arrest for cable sabotage Sean Donelan (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 06:03:54 EDT)
• Re: botted hosts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 08:24:06 EDT)
• Re: botted hosts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 08:32:59 EDT)
• ICANN's Questionable Deals Coming Under Attack Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 20:12:15 EDT)
• Re: RIPE50: Peering BoF Elmar K. Bins (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 04:52:36 EDT)
• RE: rack-mount tool drawers/chests? Mark Borchers (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 09:41:36 EDT)
• Re: rack-mount tool drawers/chests? Brandon Butterworth (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 10:11:49 EDT)
• Cisco Security Advisory: Vulnerabilities in the Internet Key Exchange Xauth Implementation Cisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 11:54:26 EDT)
• Cisco Security Advisory: Vulnerabilities in Cisco IOS Secure Shell Server Cisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 13:35:54 EDT)
• Spam (un)blocking Adam Jacob Muller (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 14:54:08 EDT)
• Re: Spam (un)blocking J.D. Falk (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 15:09:34 EDT)
• Re: Spam (un)blocking Larry Smith (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 16:03:59 EDT)
• ping from the arone armies list Gadi Evron (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 16:30:08 EDT)
• The power of default configurations Sean Donelan (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 18:00:05 EDT)
• Re: Spam (un)blocking JP Velders (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 18:10:43 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations JP Velders (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 18:15:51 EDT)
• Re: Spam (un)blocking Daniel Senie (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 18:43:07 EDT)
• Router choice for medium size hosting provider Alex Campbell (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 20:03:03 EDT)
• Re: Router choice for medium size hosting provider Mark Radabaugh (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 20:14:06 EDT)
• Re: Router choice for medium size hosting provider Bill Woodcock (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 20:19:32 EDT)
• BGP Anywhere - Global Redundancy Vandy Hamidi (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 20:35:35 EDT)
• Re: BGP Anywhere - Global Redundancy Steve Gibbard (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 20:47:50 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Florian Weimer (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 21:03:33 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Eric A. Hall (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 21:20:15 EDT)
• RE: BGP Anywhere - Global Redundancy Vandy Hamidi (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 21:22:24 EDT)
• RE: BGP Anywhere - Global Redundancy Steve Gibbard (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 21:41:50 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Sean Donelan (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 21:46:19 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Mark Andrews (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 00:33:33 EDT)
• Re: Spam (un)blocking Hank Nussbacher (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 02:15:46 EDT)
• Netlantis --- is it ever coming back? John van Oppen (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 03:17:20 EDT)
• Re: Spam (un)blocking Florian Weimer (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 05:12:02 EDT)
• Re: Netlantis --- is it ever coming back? Mathieu Arnold (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 05:32:24 EDT)
• Re: BGP Anywhere - Global Redundancy Kim Onnel (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 06:21:45 EDT)
• Re: Netlantis --- is it ever coming back? Pascal Gloor (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 08:11:30 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Duane Wessels (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 12:00:04 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Andrew Dul (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 12:02:32 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Paul Vixie (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 12:29:14 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Paul Vixie (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 12:34:50 EDT)
• RE: BGP Anywhere - Global Redundancy Howard, W. Lee (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 12:36:30 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Jon Lewis (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 13:05:02 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Christopher L. Morrow (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 13:11:43 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Paul Vixie (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 13:41:35 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Eric A. Hall (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 13:43:40 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Petri Helenius (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 13:56:01 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Paul Vixie (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 13:58:28 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Jon Lewis (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 14:02:11 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Christopher L. Morrow (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 14:04:44 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Petri Helenius (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 14:10:37 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Randy Bush (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 14:13:42 EDT)
• RE: botted hosts Ejay Hire (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 14:12:38 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Eric A. Hall (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 14:17:01 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Jon Lewis (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 14:21:45 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Eric A. Hall (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 14:31:07 EDT)
• Cingular Tom Sands (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 15:22:20 EDT)
• US still leads global spam list according to BBC article Nicole (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 17:03:42 EDT)
• Re: Router choice for medium size hosting provider Bill Woodcock (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 16:22:41 EDT)
• DNS cache poisoning update Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 16:43:33 EDT)
• Re: DNS cache poisoning update Randy Bush (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 16:49:06 EDT)
• Re: DNS cache poisoning update Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 16:55:49 EDT)
• Re: DNS cache poisoning update Gadi Evron (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 16:41:26 EDT)
• Network-Automation discussion mailing list created Brent Chapman (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 18:56:44 EDT)
• Re: Network-Automation discussion mailing list created Bill Nash (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 18:15:06 EDT)
• Re: Network-Automation discussion mailing list created Brent Chapman (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 19:18:04 EDT)
• Re: Network-Automation discussion mailing list created Bill Nash (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 18:26:26 EDT)
• Re: Network-Automation discussion mailing list created Brent Chapman (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 19:55:44 EDT)
• new operational mailing list - snort signatures for ISP's Gadi Evron (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 04:19:25 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations (no name) (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 06:00:29 EDT)
• The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 08:00:00 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Simon Waters (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 09:07:21 EDT)
• RE: Spam (un)blocking Howard, W. Lee (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 09:21:49 EDT)
• Re: Spam (un)blocking Suresh Ramasubramanian (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 09:31:42 EDT)
• AS prepending Philip Lavine (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 10:28:09 EDT)
• Re: AS prepending (no name) (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 10:33:08 EDT)
• Re: AS prepending Patrick W Gilmore (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 10:34:05 EDT)
• Re: AS prepending Jon Lewis (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 10:46:28 EDT)
• Re: AS prepending Philip Lavine (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 11:04:41 EDT)
• Re: AS prepending David Gethings (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 11:25:50 EDT)
• Re: AS prepending Jon Lewis (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 11:27:13 EDT)
• Re: AS prepending Pete Templin (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 11:35:40 EDT)
• Re: AS prepending Philip Lavine (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 12:05:59 EDT)
• Re: AS prepending David Gethings (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 12:26:12 EDT)
• Re: AS prepending David Barak (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 12:34:40 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Duane Wessels (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 12:39:59 EDT)
• Weekly Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 14:18:54 EDT)
• Port 0 traffic Sean Donelan (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 15:09:11 EDT)
• Blog... Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 15:34:54 EDT)
• Re: Blog... Susan Harris (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 16:14:02 EDT)
• Re: Blog... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 16:03:08 EDT)
• Re: Blog... Randy Bush (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 16:33:49 EDT)
• Re: Weekly Routing Table Report Joe Loiacono (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 16:48:53 EDT)
• Re: Weekly Routing Table Report (no name) (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 17:00:29 EDT)
• Botted Hosts tracking, v0.01alpha Ejay Hire (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 17:22:55 EDT)
• RE: Weekly Routing Table Report Alexander Kiwerski (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 17:42:18 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations just me (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 18:19:34 EDT)
• djbdns: An alternative to BIND Vicky Rode (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 18:55:15 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Vixie (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 19:50:51 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND John Kinsella (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 18:44:43 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Chris Kuethe (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 20:19:31 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Vicky Rode (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 20:39:38 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Niek (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 20:43:14 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Dragos Ruiu (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 20:44:21 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Vixie (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 21:11:35 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND W.D.McKinney (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 21:18:06 EDT)
• Re: Blog... Bill Woodcock (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 21:33:43 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Nathan Ward (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 21:46:25 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Niek (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 21:56:15 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Suresh Ramasubramanian (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 22:03:33 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Niek (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 22:17:44 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Suresh Ramasubramanian (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 22:29:54 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Randy Bush (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 22:43:18 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 23:05:20 EDT)
• Re: Port 0 traffic Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 23:26:28 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Adam McKenna (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 23:37:23 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Vixie (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 23:40:52 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Vixie (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 23:49:17 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Eric A. Hall (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 23:52:54 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (no name) (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 23:54:07 EDT)
• books every network operator should read? Janet Sullivan (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 00:36:54 EDT)
• RE: books every network operator should read? Paul Jasa (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 00:43:36 EDT)
• Re: Weekly Routing Table Report Philip Smith (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 01:52:10 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Steve Atkins (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 02:22:53 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (no name) (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 03:29:36 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Stephane Bortzmeyer (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 03:41:51 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND David Conrad (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 04:14:14 EDT)
• Re: books every network operator should read? Kim Onnel (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 05:55:29 EDT)
• Re: books every network operator should read? MARLON BORBA (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 09:23:48 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Niels Bakker (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 10:48:57 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Will Yardley (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 12:35:30 EDT)
• Re: Blog... Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 12:39:45 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND David Conrad (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 13:13:17 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Vixie (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 13:09:36 EDT)
• Re: AS prepending Hank Nussbacher (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 16:33:37 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Wouters (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 18:03:21 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Roger Marquis (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 19:32:12 EDT)
• Re: books every network operator should read? Roger Marquis (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 19:48:07 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Etaoin Shrdlu (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 20:26:44 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Stefan Schmidt (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 23:34:23 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Robert Boyle (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 01:30:58 EDT)
• Call for Track Chairs - APRICOT 2006 Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 01:31:53 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (no name) (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 01:34:18 EDT)
• clued/interested LEO list Gadi Evron (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 06:45:10 EDT)
• (half OT) Tool for ASN statistic freaks: webalizer_asn Fredy Kuenzler (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 11:26:44 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Vixie (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 12:03:21 EDT)
• Re: clued/interested LEO list joe mcguckin (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 15:16:44 EDT)
• Re: clued/interested LEO list Petri Helenius (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 15:24:20 EDT)
• Re: clued/interested LEO list Gadi Evron (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 14:37:41 EDT)
• Re: clued/interested LEO list Petri Helenius (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 15:49:58 EDT)
• Re: clued/interested LEO list william(at)elan.net (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 17:12:56 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Sean Donelan (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 21:15:39 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Jay R. Ashworth (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 22:24:34 EDT)
• Re: The power of default configurations Christopher L. Morrow (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 00:39:43 EDT)
• Re: clued/interested LEO list Hank Nussbacher (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 01:31:49 EDT)
• SORBS Identity theft alert Dean Anderson (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 02:39:01 EDT)
• Re: SORBS Identity theft alert Bill Nash (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 02:51:54 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Dean Anderson (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 03:03:37 EDT)
• Re: clued/interested LEO list Gadi Evron (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 02:04:03 EDT)
• Re: clued/interested LEO list Gadi Evron (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 02:06:53 EDT)
• Re: SORBS Identity theft alert Andrew D Kirch (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 03:11:30 EDT)
• Re: SORBS Identity theft alert Edward B. Dreger (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 03:15:55 EDT)
• Re: SORBS Identity theft alert Elmar K. Bins (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 03:16:53 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Simon Waters (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 04:10:00 EDT)
• Re: SORBS Identity theft alert Randy Bush (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 05:19:52 EDT)
• Re: Blog... (no name) (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 06:10:53 EDT)
• Re: SORBS Identity theft alert Dean Anderson (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 06:57:49 EDT)
• Re: SORBS Identity theft alert Dean Anderson (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 07:13:22 EDT)
• Maybe OT: MPLS QOS SLA Monitoring (no name) (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 09:43:31 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND william(at)elan.net (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 09:58:07 EDT)
• Re: SORBS Identity theft alert Matthew Sullivan (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 10:40:36 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Dean Anderson (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 12:49:39 EDT)
• Re: SORBS Identity theft alert Bill Nash (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 13:05:48 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Dean Anderson (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 13:27:26 EDT)
• Re: SORBS Identity theft alert J.D. Falk (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 13:38:37 EDT)
• Re: Blog... Bruce Pinsky (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 13:50:59 EDT)
• Re: Maybe OT: MPLS QOS SLA Monitoring Bill Nash (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 13:58:29 EDT)
• Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. just me (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 13:51:45 EDT)
• Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. just me (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:06:17 EDT)
• RE: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. just me (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:13:31 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND william(at)elan.net (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:20:07 EDT)
• Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. Matthew S. Hallacy (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:23:53 EDT)
• Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. just me (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:29:03 EDT)
• Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. Bill Woodcock (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:32:09 EDT)
• Re: Blog... Randy Bush (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:34:09 EDT)
• Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. Randy Bush (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:38:02 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Kevin Oberman (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:41:46 EDT)
• Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. just me (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:43:59 EDT)
• Re: SORBS Identity theft alert Dan Hollis (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:48:53 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND william(at)elan.net (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 15:07:27 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND David Conrad (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 15:14:10 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Vixie (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 15:55:14 EDT)
• Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. Steve Sobol (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 16:13:36 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Steve Sobol (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 16:20:35 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Dean Anderson (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 16:41:53 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Dean Anderson (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 16:53:26 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Dean Anderson (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 17:06:06 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Dean Anderson (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 17:15:45 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Mark Boolootian (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 17:17:52 EDT)
• RE: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (no email) (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 17:26:29 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Dean Anderson (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 17:30:15 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Vixie (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 17:38:35 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Richard A Steenbergen (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 18:24:19 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Steve Sobol (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 18:27:44 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Jim Popovitch (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 18:31:33 EDT)
• RE: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Malayter, Christopher (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 18:51:48 EDT)
• Re: Spam (un)blocking Markus Stumpf (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 19:18:57 EDT)
• Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. just me (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 20:49:41 EDT)
• Today's tech highlights Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 20:59:11 EDT)
• Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. william(at)elan.net (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 21:20:03 EDT)
• RE: books every network operator should read? Eric Pylko (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 21:32:14 EDT)
• Re: Blog... Chris Boyd (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 00:13:21 EDT)
• article: port 25 blocking Gadi Evron (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 00:38:31 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Tobias Reckhard (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 01:51:12 EDT)
• Re: article: port 25 blocking Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 05:31:21 EDT)
• Re: article: port 25 blocking Gadi Evron (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 05:55:09 EDT)
• Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (no name) (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 07:23:35 EDT)
• Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. Niels Bakker (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 07:38:05 EDT)
• Re: books every network operator should read? Robert E.Seastrom (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 08:04:13 EDT)
• ICMP Vulnerability Hannigan, Martin (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 08:30:38 EDT)
• Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. Dean Anderson (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 10:19:36 EDT)
• Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. Jared Mauch (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 10:29:25 EDT)
• Re: ICMP Vulnerability Dean Anderson (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 10:37:16 EDT)
• Hotmail-- Again?? Jim McBurnett (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 11:13:31 EDT)
• Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. JC Dill (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 11:45:40 EDT)
• Re: ICMP Vulnerability Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 11:57:23 EDT)
• ID theft rabbit hole gets deeper.... Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 11:56:16 EDT)
• Re: ICMP Vulnerability Alex Bligh (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 11:59:49 EDT)
• Re: ICMP Vulnerability Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 11:58:48 EDT)
• Re: ICMP Vulnerability Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 12:10:12 EDT)
• Re: Hotmail-- Again?? Scott Grayban (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 12:18:13 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Jay R. Ashworth (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 12:51:40 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Jay R. Ashworth (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 12:49:16 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Jay R. Ashworth (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 12:53:30 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Jay R. Ashworth (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 12:57:08 EDT)
• Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. Jay R. Ashworth (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 13:03:10 EDT)
• Re: Hotmail-- Again?? Matthew Black (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 13:38:24 EDT)
• RE: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. Luke Youngblood (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 14:34:08 EDT)
• Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. Steve Sobol (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 14:47:50 EDT)
• Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. Steven M. Bellovin (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 15:01:38 EDT)
• RE: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. just me (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 16:07:09 EDT)
• Today's tech news highlights.... Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 16:33:55 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Dean Anderson (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 17:01:44 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Dean Anderson (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 17:05:30 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (no name) (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 17:18:20 EDT)
• Fwd: [e2e] Wisconsin network research lab now openly available Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 18:21:57 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 19:07:46 EDT)
• Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 20:25:45 EDT)
• Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation Gordon Cook (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 21:21:40 EDT)
• Re: Hotmail-- Again?? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 21:48:41 EDT)
• Re: Hotmail-- Again?? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 22:31:58 EDT)
• New IANA IPv4 allocation for ARIN (73/8) Doug Barton (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 18:36:38 EDT)
• New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) Doug Barton (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 22:42:55 EDT)
• New block of AS Numbers to AfriNIC (36864 - 37887) Doug Barton (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 22:46:44 EDT)
• Re: Today's tech news highlights.... Mikael Abrahamsson (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 00:46:33 EDT)
• Re: ICMP Vulnerability Alexei Roudnev (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 03:09:24 EDT)
• Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) Jeroen Massar (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 04:14:05 EDT)
• Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) Doug Barton (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 04:39:05 EDT)
• Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation (no name) (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 06:20:25 EDT)
• Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) Stephane Bortzmeyer (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 08:00:08 EDT)
• New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 10:15:50 EDT)
• Re: Hotmail-- Again?? Matthew Black (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 10:22:18 EDT)
• Comcast Contact Ross Hosman (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 11:04:57 EDT)
• Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation Eric A. Hall (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 11:49:53 EDT)
• Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocati on Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 11:57:45 EDT)
• Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation Dave Crocker (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 12:24:13 EDT)
• RE: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation Hannigan, Martin (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 12:28:55 EDT)
• Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation Randy Bush (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 13:05:04 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Irwin Lazar (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 13:23:23 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Peter John Hill (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 13:32:10 EDT)
• Re: Comcast Contact Scott Grayban (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 13:46:14 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Brandon Ross (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 14:36:13 EDT)
• Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation Eric A. Hall (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 14:55:35 EDT)
• Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) John Palmer (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 16:22:28 EDT)
• Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) Steve Meuse (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 16:38:44 EDT)
• Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation (no name) (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 16:50:19 EDT)
• Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) Gary E. Miller (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 16:49:57 EDT)
• Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) Scott Weeks (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 17:26:53 EDT)
• Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Dean Anderson (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 17:48:57 EDT)
• RE: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Neil J. McRae (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 17:51:14 EDT)
• Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation Doug Barton (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 17:51:22 EDT)
• Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) John Palmer (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 17:57:32 EDT)
• Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) Scott Weeks (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 18:02:39 EDT)
• Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 18:18:57 EDT)
• Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) Richard Cox (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 18:22:30 EDT)
• where 419 scams come from (was: Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)) Steven Champeon (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 18:28:25 EDT)
• Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) Randy Bush (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 18:34:58 EDT)
• Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) Steve Meuse (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 18:51:56 EDT)
• Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) Dan Hollis (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 18:58:56 EDT)
• Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) Richard Cox (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 20:30:37 EDT)
• Today's tech news highlights Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 21:16:14 EDT)
• Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) Randy Bush (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 21:56:11 EDT)
• Re: Comcast Contact Suresh Ramasubramanian (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 23:12:50 EDT)
• NOC-DBA Phone (was Re: Comcast Contact) Jeffrey I. Schiller (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 00:21:39 EDT)
• Re: INOC-DBA Phone (was Re: Comcast Contact) Bill Woodcock (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 00:59:18 EDT)
• Re: Router choice for medium size hosting provider Bill Stewart (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 01:25:35 EDT)
• Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) Hank Nussbacher (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 01:58:09 EDT)
• Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) Nils Ketelsen (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 02:51:14 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (no name) (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 06:03:24 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Niels Bakker (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 08:46:30 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (no name) (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 09:33:20 EDT)
• OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Jonas Frey (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 09:33:55 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent william(at)elan.net (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 09:39:27 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Jonas Frey (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 09:42:03 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Alexander Koch (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 09:43:16 EDT)
• RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Neil J. McRae (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 09:43:49 EDT)
• RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Neil J. McRae (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 09:44:56 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Brandon Ross (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 09:48:34 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Fredy Kuenzler (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 09:54:01 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Richard A Steenbergen (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 10:02:58 EDT)
• RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Neil J. McRae (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 10:16:04 EDT)
• IANA IPv4 allocations and bogon update: 41/8 Rob Thomas (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 10:26:01 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Christopher L. Morrow (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 10:37:57 EDT)
• AUP for NANOG? Matthew Black (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 10:48:42 EDT)
• Re: AUP for NANOG? Randy Bush (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 11:15:29 EDT)
• Re: AUP for NANOG? Edward Lewis (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 11:32:45 EDT)
• Re: AUP for NANOG? Chris Kuethe (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 11:36:27 EDT)
• Re: AUP for NANOG? Susan Harris (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 11:43:09 EDT)
• Re: AUP for NANOG? Randy Bush (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 11:45:22 EDT)
• Re: AUP for NANOG? Romain Komorn (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 12:14:30 EDT)
• Re: AUP for NANOG? Scott Grayban (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 12:22:26 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Richard A Steenbergen (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 12:27:39 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Sean Donelan (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 13:07:48 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Patrick W Gilmore (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 13:11:56 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Steve Gibbard (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 13:38:28 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Peter John Hill (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 14:00:47 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Richard A Steenbergen (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 14:16:32 EDT)
• Re: AUP for NANOG? Bill Nash (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 14:56:05 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Daniel Senie (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 14:24:50 EDT)
• RE: AUP for NANOG? Hannigan, Martin (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 14:48:56 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Jim Popovitch (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 14:59:38 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Peter John Hill (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 15:03:03 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Peter John Hill (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 15:04:38 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Christopher L. Morrow (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 15:17:26 EDT)
• RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Neil J. McRae (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 15:19:41 EDT)
• Re: AUP for NANOG? Steve Gibbard (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 15:20:14 EDT)
• RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Daniel Senie (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 15:39:49 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Alexander Koch (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 15:47:12 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Daniel Golding (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 15:51:44 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Richard A Steenbergen (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 15:51:57 EDT)
• Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Dan Lockwood (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 15:58:31 EDT)
• Comment for new folks and posting [was: AUP for NANOG?] Scott Weeks (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:09:50 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Patrick W Gilmore (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:13:33 EDT)
• RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Luke Youngblood (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:15:41 EDT)
• RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Randy Bush (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:23:38 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (no name) (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:26:36 EDT)
• RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Jay Hennigan (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:29:14 EDT)
• RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Jim Popovitch (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:31:52 EDT)
• RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Hannigan, Martin (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:34:56 EDT)
• RE: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Alexander Kiwerski (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:35:02 EDT)
• Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (no name) (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:34:53 EDT)
• SONET David Barak (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:50:56 EDT)
• RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Hannigan, Martin (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:53:20 EDT)
• Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Stephen J. Wilcox (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:54:50 EDT)
• RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Neil J. McRae (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:58:08 EDT)
• Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Randy Bush (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:03:09 EDT)
• Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Stephen J. Wilcox (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:07:25 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Patrick W Gilmore (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:07:37 EDT)
• Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Patrick W Gilmore (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:12:15 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Richard A Steenbergen (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:16:44 EDT)
• Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Steven M. Bellovin (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:20:59 EDT)
• Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Jim Popovitch (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:19:13 EDT)
• Re: SONET (no name) (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:25:42 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Christopher L. Morrow (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:27:05 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Patrick W Gilmore (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:29:46 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Stephen J. Wilcox (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:46:37 EDT)
• Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Matthew Crocker (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:54:32 EDT)
• RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Dan Lockwood (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 18:04:04 EDT)
• Postini Problems? Lanny Jason Godsey (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 18:04:51 EDT)
• Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Jerry Pasker (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 18:09:47 EDT)
• RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Dan Lockwood (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 18:24:01 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Daniel Roesen (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 18:36:22 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers John Payne (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 18:45:58 EDT)
• RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent David Schwartz (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 18:49:13 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent German Martinez (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 18:52:49 EDT)
• RE: BGP Anywhere - Global Redundancy Vandy Hamidi (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 18:58:24 EDT)
• Partial Transit (was Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) Deepak Jain (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 19:00:20 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Daniel Roesen (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 19:01:14 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Brandon Ross (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 19:09:03 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Steve Sobol (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 19:11:15 EDT)
• RE: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Brandon Ross (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 19:14:23 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Brandon Ross (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 19:16:15 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Daniel Roesen (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 19:27:33 EDT)
• Today's tech news highlights Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 19:35:24 EDT)
• New international IPv6 operators forum Daniel Roesen (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 20:15:48 EDT)
• Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Bill Stewart (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 20:25:12 EDT)
• Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Justin M. Streiner (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 20:34:50 EDT)
• Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Bill Stewart (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 20:37:06 EDT)
• fwd: Cobell lawyers ask trust systems be shutdown again (3rd time) Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 21:39:30 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Daniel Golding (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 22:12:36 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Jeff Cole (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 23:28:03 EDT)
• Microsoft SOHO router multicast problem? - or maybe it's just doing what it's supposed to be doing... Mark Radabaugh (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 23:48:10 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Jerry Pasker (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 01:13:08 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Patrick W Gilmore (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 01:31:00 EDT)
• Six PCs caused BigPond problems Sean Donelan (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 01:38:28 EDT)
• Re: Six PCs caused BigPond problems Patrick W Gilmore (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 01:44:19 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Jerry Pasker (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 01:45:13 EDT)
• Re: Six PCs caused BigPond problems Bill Stewart (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 01:49:28 EDT)
• Re: Microsoft SOHO router multicast problem? - or maybe it's just doing what it's supposed to be doing... Mark Radabaugh (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 03:47:02 EDT)
• Re: AUP for NANOG? Per Gregers Bilse (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 04:46:14 EDT)
• RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Neil J. McRae (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 05:59:11 EDT)
• Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (no name) (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 06:34:17 EDT)
• RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Jonas Frey (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 06:48:52 EDT)
• Re: Postini Problems? Martin Hepworth (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 07:00:48 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Niels Bakker (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 07:47:10 EDT)
• The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 08:00:00 EDT)
• RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Hannigan, Martin (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 08:00:14 EDT)
• RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (no name) (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 08:29:28 EDT)
• Re: Six PCs caused BigPond problems Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 08:46:17 EDT)
• Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? David Lesher (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 08:58:50 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Daniel Golding (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 08:59:07 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Adrian Chadd (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 09:03:07 EDT)
• RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Neil J. McRae (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 09:29:00 EDT)
• N+? redundancy (no name) (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 09:31:19 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Brandon Ross (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 09:42:33 EDT)
• Re: Postini Problems? John Levine (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 10:21:53 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Patrick W Gilmore (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 09:54:14 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Paul Vixie (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 11:53:36 EDT)
• RE: MD5 for TCP/BGP Sessions Doug Legge (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 12:03:27 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Petri Helenius (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 12:07:19 EDT)
• Re: N+? redundancy (no name) (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 12:10:35 EDT)
• Best Practices Knowledge Capture (was: Re: AUP for NANOG?) Jay R. Ashworth (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 12:53:13 EDT)
• Re: AUP for NANOG? Gregory Hicks (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 13:09:41 EDT)
• Weekly Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 14:07:16 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Fredy Kuenzler (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 14:10:54 EDT)
• Re: AUP for NANOG? John Dupuy (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 14:13:15 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Tom Vest (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 14:23:09 EDT)
• Service providers that NAT their whole network? Philip Matthews (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 15:39:56 EDT)
• Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Jay R. Ashworth (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 15:43:50 EDT)
• Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Jon Lewis (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 15:58:49 EDT)
• Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Andrew - Supernews (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 16:06:04 EDT)
• Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? sjk (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 16:15:36 EDT)
• Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Steve Meuse (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 16:27:10 EDT)
• Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Bill Woodcock (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 16:32:43 EDT)
• Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers Daniel Golding (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 16:37:32 EDT)
• Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Scott Call (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 16:40:12 EDT)
• RE: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Reeves, Rob (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 17:15:01 EDT)
• Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Jay R. Ashworth (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 17:35:06 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Patrick W. Gilmore (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 17:40:29 EDT)
• Today's tech news highlights.... Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 19:15:49 EDT)
• Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Jeff Kell (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 21:24:09 EDT)
• RFC1918 in-addr.arpa local copies Forrest W. Christian (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 23:55:37 EDT)
• Re: RFC1918 in-addr.arpa local copies Christopher L. Morrow (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 00:06:40 EDT)
• Re: RFC1918 in-addr.arpa local copies Paul Vixie (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 00:18:49 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Stephen J. Wilcox (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 12:06:50 EDT)
• cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) Mikael Abrahamsson (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 12:32:40 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Fredy Kuenzler (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 12:34:18 EDT)
• cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) (no name) (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 13:57:59 EDT)
• N+? redundancy (no name) (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 14:00:47 EDT)
• Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (no name) (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 15:06:17 EDT)
• Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) Brandon Butterworth (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 19:30:41 EDT)
• Hostway Network Security Contact Aaron Glenn (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 21:24:15 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Steve Gibbard (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 21:51:01 EDT)
• Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems Sean Donelan (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 22:03:39 EDT)
• grrr Scott Grayban (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 02:17:05 EDT)
• Topics for NANOG 34 Steve Feldman (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 03:14:43 EDT)
• Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) Mike Leber (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 03:15:38 EDT)
• Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) Mikael Abrahamsson (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 04:17:26 EDT)
• BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS Kim Onnel (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 07:28:21 EDT)
• Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 07:47:58 EDT)
• RE: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) Hannigan, Martin (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 11:50:33 EDT)
• Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) Randy Bush (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 04:23:53 EDT)
• Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS Randy Bush (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 12:01:55 EDT)
• Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS Christopher L. Morrow (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 12:16:33 EDT)
• Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS Randy Bush (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 12:25:45 EDT)
• Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems Florian Weimer (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 12:29:27 EDT)
• Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 12:39:08 EDT)
• Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems Florian Weimer (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 12:51:04 EDT)
• Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 13:01:09 EDT)
• Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS J.D. Falk (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 13:05:01 EDT)
• Re: Topics for NANOG 34 william(at)elan.net (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 13:20:24 EDT)
• Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) (no name) (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 13:33:09 EDT)
• RE: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) (no name) (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 13:36:23 EDT)
• Re: cost of doing business Andrew Odlyzko (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 13:54:52 EDT)
• Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) Mikael Abrahamsson (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 13:55:03 EDT)
• Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems Steven M. Bellovin (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 14:18:57 EDT)
• RE: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) Malayter, Christopher (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 14:24:32 EDT)
• Re: grrr just me (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 14:34:19 EDT)
• Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? Jay R. Ashworth (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 14:39:21 EDT)
• Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? just me (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 14:49:42 EDT)
• Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS Kim Onnel (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 14:51:21 EDT)
• Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS John Kristoff (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 15:04:06 EDT)
• Re: grrr David Lesher (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 15:15:04 EDT)
• Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) Marshall Eubanks (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 15:16:04 EDT)
• Re: grrr Florian Weimer (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 15:22:24 EDT)
• RE: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) Mikael Abrahamsson (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 15:27:41 EDT)
• Re: grrr Jerry Pasker (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 15:28:23 EDT)
• Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems Martin J. Levy (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 15:35:21 EDT)
• Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS J.D. Falk (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 16:00:30 EDT)
• Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS Steven M. Bellovin (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 16:13:06 EDT)
• ATT.net Security Contact Joseph W. Breu (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 16:39:59 EDT)
• Re: grrr Owen DeLong (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 17:15:41 EDT)
• Re: ATT.net Security Contact Mike Tancsa (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 17:25:49 EDT)
• Re: grrr Will Yardley (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 19:54:26 EDT)
• Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) Randy Bush (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 20:23:19 EDT)
• Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS John Kristoff (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 20:25:07 EDT)
• Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS Sean Donelan (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 20:40:00 EDT)
• Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems Christopher L. Morrow (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 22:17:47 EDT)
• Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS Christopher L. Morrow (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 22:19:11 EDT)
• Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS Christopher L. Morrow (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 22:24:06 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Jonas Frey (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 22:36:22 EDT)
• Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS Christopher L. Morrow (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 22:38:56 EDT)
• Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS Randy Bush (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 22:48:45 EDT)
• Re: Topics for NANOG 34 Steve Feldman (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 22:48:56 EDT)
• RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent John van Oppen (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 22:49:27 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Patrick W. Gilmore (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 23:16:13 EDT)
• Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems Eric A. Hall (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 23:20:05 EDT)
• Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems Eric A. Hall (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 23:43:43 EDT)
• Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS Sean Donelan (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 23:49:02 EDT)
• Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) Mikael Abrahamsson (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 01:21:09 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Patrick W. Gilmore (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 01:25:32 EDT)
• RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent John van Oppen (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 02:10:54 EDT)
• Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems David Conrad (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 02:14:06 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Michael Sinatra (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 02:42:23 EDT)
• IX Panel for Seattle Malayter, Christopher (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 03:08:07 EDT)
• Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (no name) (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 04:47:48 EDT)
• RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Peter & Karin Dambier (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 04:46:11 EDT)
• Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (no name) (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 04:53:32 EDT)
• Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? (no name) (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 05:05:28 EDT)
• DSCP ECN bits (no name) (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 06:27:33 EDT)
• RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 08:07:44 EDT)
• Security Concerns Boosted VeriSign's Dot-Net Bid Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 10:21:34 EDT)
• Re: Security Concerns Boosted VeriSign's Dot-Net Bid Scott Grayban (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 10:55:52 EDT)
• Re: cost of doing business Joe Abley (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 11:25:16 EDT)
• Re: cost of doing business Mikael Abrahamsson (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 11:33:37 EDT)
• Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations Jay R. Ashworth (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 11:45:06 EDT)
• Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations Patrick W. Gilmore (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 11:50:11 EDT)
• Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 11:33:52 EDT)
• Re: N+? redundancy (no name) (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 12:07:06 EDT)
• Re: cost of doing business Joe Abley (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 12:13:38 EDT)
• Re: N+? redundancy (no name) (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 12:24:52 EDT)
• Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems Daniel Golding (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 13:13:49 EDT)
• Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations Chris Adams (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 13:35:17 EDT)
• RE: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations Erik Amundson (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 13:45:57 EDT)
• Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations Patrick W. Gilmore (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 13:50:35 EDT)
• Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations Paul G (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 13:48:49 EDT)
• Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations Chris Adams (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 14:02:46 EDT)
• Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations Eric Louie (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 14:17:13 EDT)
• Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations Patrick W. Gilmore (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 14:36:45 EDT)
• Re: cost of doing business Thomas Kernen (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 14:48:06 EDT)
• Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations Daniel Golding (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 14:57:06 EDT)
• Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations Jason Frisvold (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 15:05:55 EDT)
• Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations Mikael Abrahamsson (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 15:16:10 EDT)
• Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations Rachael Treu Gomes (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 15:14:44 EDT)
• Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations Florian Weimer (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 15:45:54 EDT)
• Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems Florian Weimer (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 15:49:09 EDT)
• Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations Florian Weimer (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 15:46:48 EDT)
• Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations Jason Frisvold (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 16:05:20 EDT)
• Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems Jason Frisvold (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 16:07:07 EDT)
• Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations Peter & Karin Dambier (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 16:08:01 EDT)
• Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 16:32:02 EDT)
• Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Bruce Pinsky (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 16:52:38 EDT)
• Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Alex Rubenstein (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 16:53:29 EDT)
• Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Jared Mauch (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 17:02:12 EDT)
• Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Jeff Rosowski (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 17:05:25 EDT)
• Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Andy Johnson (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 17:08:51 EDT)
• Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations Tony Rall (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 17:10:03 EDT)
• Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Christopher L. Morrow (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 17:26:33 EDT)
• Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... just me (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 17:35:04 EDT)
• Re: DSCP ECN bits Vicky Rode (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 17:54:34 EDT)
• Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Steve Sobol (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 19:14:01 EDT)
• Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Robert Bonomi (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 20:23:50 EDT)
• Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competition Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 22:56:19 EDT)
• Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations Matthew Sullivan (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 00:16:35 EDT)
• Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations Randy Bush (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 00:28:29 EDT)
• Re: cost of doing business Thomas Kernen (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 01:59:00 EDT)
• Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Matt Taber (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 08:44:09 EDT)
• Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Alex Rubenstein (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 09:07:40 EDT)
• Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Philip Matthews (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 09:09:48 EDT)
• Re: cost of doing business Marshall Eubanks (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 09:28:19 EDT)
• Re: cost of doing business Thomas Kernen (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 09:46:58 EDT)
• Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Jason Slagle (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 10:09:37 EDT)
• Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Matt Taber (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 10:12:19 EDT)
• Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 11:47:09 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Jim Popovitch (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 12:11:55 EDT)
• Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competition Justin M. Streiner (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 12:42:26 EDT)
• Re: cost of doing business Marshall Eubanks (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 13:27:26 EDT)
• Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Jay R. Ashworth (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 13:47:39 EDT)
• Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competition Alex Rubenstein (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 14:05:02 EDT)
• Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competition william(at)elan.net (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 14:22:24 EDT)
• Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competition Alex Rubenstein (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 14:23:34 EDT)
• Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competition william(at)elan.net (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 14:51:10 EDT)
• Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competition Justin M. Streiner (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 15:08:51 EDT)
• Ameritrade warns 200,000 clients of lost data Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 15:28:14 EDT)
• Re: Ameritrade warns 200,000 clients of lost data Alex Rubenstein (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 15:44:28 EDT)
• Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations JC Dill (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 15:48:23 EDT)
• Re: Ameritrade warns 200,000 clients of lost data Alex Rubenstein (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 15:49:46 EDT)
• Re: Ameritrade warns 200,000 clients of lost data Florian Weimer (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 15:53:21 EDT)
• Re: Ameritrade warns 200,000 clients of lost data Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 16:08:49 EDT)
• Re: Ameritrade warns 200,000 clients of lost data Douglas Otis (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 16:16:36 EDT)
• New IPv6 allocations from IANA to RIPE NCC (2a00::/21) and ARIN (2600::/22, 2604::/22, 2608::/22, 260c::/22) Doug Barton (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 16:30:55 EDT)
• Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Owen DeLong (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 17:25:19 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Crist Clark (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 17:30:40 EDT)
• Verizon's DSL Still Partially Clothed Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 18:47:36 EDT)
• Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Tom Vest (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 21:13:28 EDT)
• Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 22:11:52 EDT)
• Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 22:24:05 EDT)
• Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competition Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 22:26:36 EDT)
• Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Tom Vest (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 22:36:01 EDT)
• Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 22:57:46 EDT)
• Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Tom Vest (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 23:17:40 EDT)
• Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc Michael Loftis (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 02:53:32 EDT)
• Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc Hank Nussbacher (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 02:46:49 EDT)
• Promosis? Who are these guys? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 03:08:18 EDT)
• Re: Promosis? Who are these guys? Florian Weimer (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 05:11:10 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Dean Anderson (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 05:28:44 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (no name) (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 05:34:11 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Crist Clark (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 12:54:07 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Dean Anderson (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 14:00:00 EDT)
• Re: Promosis? Who are these guys? Douglas Otis (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 14:09:24 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Dean Anderson (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 14:13:33 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Patrick W. Gilmore (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 14:20:23 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Chris Adams (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 14:20:41 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (fwd) Dean Anderson (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 14:41:38 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (no name) (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 14:51:07 EDT)
• RIPE NCC to begin allocating from 87/8 leo vegoda (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 15:06:26 EDT)
• This fall in LA Susan Harris (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 15:07:02 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Steve Gibbard (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 15:26:33 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Dean Anderson (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 15:29:09 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (no name) (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 15:30:45 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Patrick W. Gilmore (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 15:47:46 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (no name) (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 16:04:45 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (fwd) Matt Buford (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 16:15:46 EDT)
• Yahoo mail ops contact just me (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 20:00:08 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Stephen J. Wilcox (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 20:31:04 EDT)
• Getting a BGP table in to a lab Nathan Ward (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 20:34:46 EDT)
• RE: Getting a BGP table in to a lab Scott Morris (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 20:41:30 EDT)
• RE: Getting a BGP table in to a lab Bill Nash (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 20:47:13 EDT)
• RE: Getting a BGP table in to a lab Scott Morris (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 20:49:32 EDT)
• RE: Getting a BGP table in to a lab Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 20:46:49 EDT)
• Re: Getting a BGP table in to a lab (no name) (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 01:36:54 EDT)
• RE: Getting a BGP table in to a lab Frotzler, Florian (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 04:35:02 EDT)
• RE: Getting a BGP table in to a lab Reeves, Rob (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 11:17:52 EDT)
• Re: Getting a BGP table in to a lab Okan Demirmen (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 11:31:23 EDT)
• Re: Getting a BGP table in to a lab Steven M. Bellovin (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 12:05:48 EDT)
• Re: Getting a BGP table in to a lab Arnold Nipper (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 17:08:38 EDT)
• AW: Getting a BGP table in to a lab John van Oppen (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 17:24:59 EDT)
• Re: Getting a BGP table in to a lab Andre Oppermann (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 17:36:03 EDT)
• Re: Getting a BGP table in to a lab Daniel Roesen (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 17:49:09 EDT)
• Re: Getting a BGP table in to a lab Nathan Ward (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 17:56:23 EDT)
• RE: Getting a BGP table in to a lab Reeves, Rob (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 18:05:58 EDT)
• Load balance over multiple bgp feeds Mike Hyde (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 19:47:36 EDT)
• Re: Load balance over multiple bgp feeds Will Yardley (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 20:06:27 EDT)
• Re: Load balance over multiple bgp feeds Will Yardley (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 20:15:29 EDT)
• Re: Getting a BGP table in to a lab Nathan Ward (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 23:22:05 EDT)
• New worm? Chris Boyd (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 00:11:41 EDT)
• Re: New worm? Jon Lewis (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 00:28:23 EDT)
• Re: New worm? Chris Boyd (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 00:29:54 EDT)
• Re: New worm? Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 01:13:04 EDT)
• Re: New worm? Chris Boyd (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 01:22:16 EDT)
• Re: New worm? Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 01:26:50 EDT)
• The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 08:00:00 EDT)
• Any supply a live contact for mac.com? D. Campbell MacInnes (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 08:36:51 EDT)
• Re: New worm? Adi Linden (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 11:11:43 EDT)
• Root DNS servers Joseph Nuara (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 11:16:05 EDT)
• Root DNS Servers 2 Joseph Nuara (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 11:38:20 EDT)
• Re: Root DNS servers (no name) (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 11:43:50 EDT)
• Re: Root DNS Servers 2 Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 11:47:57 EDT)
• Re: Root DNS Servers 2 Patrick W. Gilmore (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 11:55:32 EDT)
• Re: Root DNS servers Peter & Karin Dambier (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 12:01:11 EDT)
• Re: New worm? Peter John Hill (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 13:27:56 EDT)
• Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? John Payne (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 14:55:25 EDT)
• Weekly Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 14:09:54 EDT)
• Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Chris Woodfield (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 13:14:58 EDT)
• RE: Root DNS servers Graeme Clark (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 17:52:24 EDT)
• Dual rackmountable power supply? Mike Sawicki (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 18:33:51 EDT)
• Re: Dual rackmountable power supply? Arnold Nipper (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 18:39:07 EDT)
• AW: Dual rackmountable power supply? John van Oppen (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 18:45:46 EDT)
• Re: Dual rackmountable power supply? william(at)elan.net (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 18:52:54 EDT)
• RE: Root DNS servers Hannigan, Martin (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 20:06:42 EDT)
• Re: Dual rackmountable power supply? (no name) (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 20:06:54 EDT)
• RE: Dual rackmountable power supply? Hannigan, Martin (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 20:43:24 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Dean Anderson (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 23:20:04 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Dean Anderson (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 23:21:52 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Dean Anderson (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 23:37:44 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 23:44:28 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Dean Anderson (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 23:55:23 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Patrick W. Gilmore (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 00:13:14 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Patrick W. Gilmore (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 00:21:02 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? James (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 00:29:52 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Steve Gibbard (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 01:51:31 EDT)
• Re: Load balance over multiple bgp feeds Olivier Bonaventure (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 03:15:40 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Stephen J. Wilcox (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 05:22:03 EDT)
• RE: Root DNS Servers 2 Greg Schwimer (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 11:48:10 EDT)
• Re: [dnsop] Re: Root Anycast (fwd) Dean Anderson (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 14:34:44 EDT)
• Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Chris Woodfield (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 14:36:55 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? PPLB is not a good thing Robert M. Enger (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 15:29:18 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Dean Anderson (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 16:13:22 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? James (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 17:09:52 EDT)
• DNS Round Robin Roy (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 17:55:22 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (no name) (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 17:23:38 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Niels Bakker (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 18:29:04 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (no name) (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 02:00:48 EDT)
• Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Bill Stewart (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 04:22:58 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Bill Stewart (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 04:35:11 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (no name) (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 05:07:03 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (no name) (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 05:24:37 EDT)
• gigabit residential Petri Helenius (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 10:46:03 EDT)
• [Fwd: Re: [Full-disclosure] Possible Virus activity] Austin McKinley (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 10:57:27 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Jay R. Ashworth (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 13:43:53 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Robert M. Enger (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 16:00:40 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (no name) (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 16:23:00 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Robert M. Enger (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 16:40:50 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Jay R. Ashworth (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 17:50:46 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Steve Gibbard (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 18:09:08 EDT)
• versions, filtering, and access OH MY!! (no name) (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 03:40:41 EDT)
• Re: versions, filtering, and access OH MY!! Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 03:47:37 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 05:04:03 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Jay R. Ashworth (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 14:11:28 EDT)
• Problems with NS*.worldnic.com Greg Schwimer (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 14:34:54 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com aljuhani (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 15:39:57 EDT)
• RE: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com Graeme Clark (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 16:08:01 EDT)
• Re: DNS Round Robin Florian Weimer (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 19:11:14 EDT)
• RE: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com Christopher L. Morrow (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 19:15:21 EDT)
• Re: DNS Round Robin Todd Vierling (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 20:08:18 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com Randy Bush (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 20:24:12 EDT)
• Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 21:36:34 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com Matt Larson (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 21:58:58 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 22:37:21 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com Janet Sullivan (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 00:15:10 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com Rodney Joffe (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 00:34:54 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 00:45:40 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (no name) (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 00:55:27 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com Randy Bush (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 01:13:47 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com william(at)elan.net (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 01:19:51 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com Jerry Pasker (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 02:14:28 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (no name) (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 03:10:41 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com Simon Waters (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 04:14:28 EDT)
• Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competition william(at)elan.net (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 05:02:08 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com Kevin Loch (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 08:51:24 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com Christopher L. Morrow (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 09:22:41 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com Randy Bush (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 09:35:13 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com Edward Lewis (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 09:46:57 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com Peter Corlett (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 09:51:20 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com Christopher L. Morrow (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 09:58:29 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com Christopher L. Morrow (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 10:34:08 EDT)
• CircleID, was: Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc Daniel Golding (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 10:56:07 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com Steven M. Bellovin (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 11:05:45 EDT)
• FW: Port 25 - Blacklash Paul Ryan (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 11:10:41 EDT)
• RE: Port 25 - Blacklash Hannigan, Martin (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 12:14:45 EDT)
• Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com aljuhani (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 12:30:58 EDT)
• using TCP53 for DNS Patrick W. Gilmore (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 12:39:09 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Edward B. Dreger (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 12:59:20 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Edward B. Dreger (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 13:07:41 EDT)
• Re: FW: Port 25 - Blacklash Matt Ghali (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 13:53:28 EDT)
• Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Adam Jacob Muller (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 14:17:55 EDT)
• RE: Port 25 - Blacklash Hannigan, Martin (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 14:27:07 EDT)
• Re: FW: Port 25 - Blacklash Eric Gauthier (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 14:03:42 EDT)
• Anyone from Verizon familiar with physical plant in PHL (no name) (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 13:36:58 EDT)
• Re: using TCP53 for DNS Florian Weimer (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 14:45:16 EDT)
• Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Florian Weimer (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 14:47:24 EDT)
• Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Hank Nussbacher (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 14:49:24 EDT)
• Re: using TCP53 for DNS Christopher L. Morrow (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 15:01:47 EDT)
• Re: using TCP53 for DNS Patrick W. Gilmore (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 15:04:25 EDT)
• Re: using TCP53 for DNS Florian Weimer (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 15:09:20 EDT)
• The "not long discussion" thread.... Jerry Pasker (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 15:44:28 EDT)
• Internet2 Vicky Rode (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 15:58:53 EDT)
• Re: Port 25 - Blacklash (no name) (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 16:30:55 EDT)
• Re: Internet2 Mikael Abrahamsson (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 16:53:14 EDT)
• Re: Internet2 Scott Call (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:05:34 EDT)
• Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Dave Rand (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:10:33 EDT)
• Re: using TCP53 for DNS Christopher L. Morrow (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:13:27 EDT)
• Re: Internet2 Daniel Roesen (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:17:17 EDT)
• Re: Internet2 Randy Bush (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:17:22 EDT)
• Re: Internet2 Mikael Abrahamsson (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:18:08 EDT)
• Re: Internet2 Patrick W. Gilmore (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:22:59 EDT)
• Re: Internet2 Vicky Rode (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:07:15 EDT)
• Re: Internet2 Adam McKenna (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:48:37 EDT)
• Re: Port 25 - Blacklash (no name) (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:47:56 EDT)
• Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Daniel Golding (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:50:11 EDT)
• Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Dave Rand (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:59:50 EDT)
• Re: Internet2 Jay Ford (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 18:16:44 EDT)
• Sheet could shelter Wi-Fi from eavesdroppers Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 18:50:05 EDT)
• Re: Internet2 Vicky Rode (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 19:49:45 EDT)
• Re: Internet2 Vicky Rode (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 19:55:20 EDT)
• NPR program: "The Internet as a public utility" Frank Coluccio (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 20:48:03 EDT)
• Re: The "not long discussion" thread.... Steve Sobol (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 20:59:55 EDT)
• FCC Chief Wants 911 Service for Internet Phones Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 21:31:42 EDT)
• Re: The "not long discussion" thread.... Christopher L. Morrow (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 22:59:21 EDT)
• Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 23:09:06 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 23:24:18 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Jerry Pasker (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 00:46:48 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 01:38:00 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 01:38:27 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 01:42:53 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 01:46:24 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Mark Newton (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 02:12:49 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 02:06:22 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Mark Newton (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 02:37:32 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (no name) (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 02:36:54 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Joe Shen (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 02:56:10 EDT)
• Re: Internet2 Randy Bush (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:13:35 EDT)
• Detecting VoIP traffic in ISP network Joe Shen (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:15:31 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Dragos Ruiu (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:13:16 EDT)
• Re: using TCP53 for DNS Stephane Bortzmeyer (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:21:31 EDT)
• Re: using TCP53 for DNS Stephane Bortzmeyer (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:24:34 EDT)
• Re: using TCP53 for DNS Stephane Bortzmeyer (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:26:44 EDT)
• clarity (no name) (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:39:52 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden william(at)elan.net (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:42:41 EDT)
• Re: Sheet could shelter Wi-Fi from eavesdroppers Martin Hepworth (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:43:10 EDT)
• Re: Internet2 Douglas Dever (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:45:11 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Elmar K. Bins (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:45:13 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Elmar K. Bins (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:50:21 EDT)
• Re: FCC Chief Wants 911 Service for Internet Phones Peter & Karin Dambier (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 04:13:09 EDT)
• Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Alexei Roudnev (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 04:11:03 EDT)
• Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Joel Jaeggli (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 04:47:59 EDT)
• Re: The "not long discussion" thread.... Jerry Pasker (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 04:51:01 EDT)
• Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Suresh Ramasubramanian (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 05:01:42 EDT)
• Re: Detecting VoIP traffic in ISP network Suresh Ramasubramanian (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 05:02:53 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Stephen J. Wilcox (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 05:41:53 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 06:07:47 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 06:09:24 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 06:13:01 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Suresh Ramasubramanian (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 06:13:51 EDT)
• Re: clarity Owen DeLong (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 06:19:04 EDT)
• Re: clarity John Clarke (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 06:28:50 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (no name) (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 06:31:40 EDT)
• bearing burdens (no name) (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 06:40:17 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 06:43:00 EDT)
• Re: clarity william(at)elan.net (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 06:50:28 EDT)
• Re: clarity Owen DeLong (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 07:12:57 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Greg Boehnlein (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 08:06:51 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 08:06:29 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Greg Boehnlein (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 08:13:51 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden David Lesher (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 08:24:32 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 08:26:10 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Edward Lewis (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 09:25:55 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 09:40:40 EDT)
• PAIX Outages Jay Patel (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 10:45:15 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Greg Boehnlein (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 10:47:11 EDT)
• Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Joe Maimon (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 10:59:16 EDT)
• Another panix.com scenario? Hushmail this time Suresh Ramasubramanian (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 11:28:06 EDT)
• Re: Another panix.com scenario? Hushmail this time Adam Jacob Muller (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 11:38:34 EDT)
• Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Matthew S. Hallacy (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 11:53:37 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Sam Hayes Merritt, III (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 12:38:33 EDT)
• Re: Port 25 - Blacklash (no name) (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 12:45:31 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Steven M. Bellovin (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 13:39:26 EDT)
• Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Suresh Ramasubramanian (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 13:44:25 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Dan Hollis (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 14:08:42 EDT)
• cox communications contact please? Jonathan M. Slivko (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 14:14:11 EDT)
• Re: clarity Steven Champeon (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 14:15:30 EDT)
• Re: Detecting VoIP traffic in ISP network Petri Helenius (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 14:17:15 EDT)
• Re: Internet2 Randy Bush (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 14:23:43 EDT)
• Re: Detecting VoIP traffic in ISP network Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 14:26:41 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Daniel Roesen (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 14:33:03 EDT)
• Re: PAIX Outages Randy Bush (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 14:43:10 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Petri Helenius (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 14:55:14 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Steve Sobol (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 15:02:09 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden william(at)elan.net (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 15:01:58 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Daniel Senie (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 15:02:08 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 15:02:29 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 15:05:18 EDT)
• Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc Scott Weeks (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 15:45:56 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 15:47:51 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 15:56:00 EDT)
• Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc Randy Bush (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 15:57:56 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Steven M. Bellovin (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:00:02 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Douglas Otis (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:08:32 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:08:41 EDT)
• Re: clarity Owen DeLong (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:10:24 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden W. Mark Herrick, Jr. (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:11:02 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:10:08 EDT)
• Re: Internet2 Dan Hollis (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:11:26 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Dan Hollis (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:20:12 EDT)
• Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc Leo Bicknell (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:14:53 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:33:10 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Petri Helenius (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:36:23 EDT)
• Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc Scott Weeks (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:41:07 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Petri Helenius (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:46:07 EDT)
• Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc (no name) (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:52:04 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:52:30 EDT)
• Re: Internet2 Florian Weimer (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:58:50 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden James Baldwin (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 17:09:00 EDT)
• Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc Randy Bush (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 18:27:51 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 19:22:47 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Bill Stewart (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 20:08:45 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Bill Stewart (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 20:41:36 EDT)
• Re: Detecting VoIP traffic in ISP network Joe Shen (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 21:09:00 EDT)
• Re: The "not long discussion" thread.... Christopher L. Morrow (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 21:47:36 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Steve Sobol (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 21:48:19 EDT)
• Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc Suresh Ramasubramanian (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 22:20:50 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 00:55:11 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Steven J. Sobol (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 02:16:36 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 02:48:39 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Mark Newton (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 03:08:00 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Iljitsch van Beijnum (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 03:17:42 EDT)
• Re: using TCP53 for DNS Nils Ketelsen (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 03:25:47 EDT)
• Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN Stephane Bortzmeyer (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 04:47:56 EDT)
• Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN Alex Bligh (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 05:00:10 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Dan Hollis (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 05:07:15 EDT)
• Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN Scott W Brim (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 07:06:48 EDT)
• RE: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Olsen, Jason (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 09:03:57 EDT)
• Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN Alex Bligh (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 09:17:33 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Adi Linden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 09:53:13 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Adi Linden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:01:26 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Iljitsch van Beijnum (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:06:00 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Adi Linden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:09:16 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Iljitsch van Beijnum (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:10:54 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Adi Linden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:17:53 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Adi Linden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:21:59 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Steve Sobol (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:20:37 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (no name) (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:30:48 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (no name) (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:31:28 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (no name) (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:44:34 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden James Baldwin (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:47:50 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Iljitsch van Beijnum (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 11:43:02 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (no name) (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 11:51:23 EDT)
• BT to offer six classes of service Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 12:02:59 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden James Baldwin (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 12:18:17 EDT)
• FCC To Require 911 for VoIP Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 12:45:23 EDT)
• Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN Doug Barton (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 12:47:56 EDT)
• Re: BT to offer six classes of service Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 12:14:37 EDT)
• Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 13:20:07 EDT)
• Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN Iljitsch van Beijnum (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 13:36:17 EDT)
• Re: PAIX Outages Richard A Steenbergen (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 13:51:54 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Andy Johnson (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 14:03:14 EDT)
• Re: PAIX Outages Leo Bicknell (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 14:11:40 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Petri Helenius (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 14:46:44 EDT)
• Re: PAIX Outages Majdi S. Abbas (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 15:13:54 EDT)
• Internet email performance study Robert Beverly (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 15:21:01 EDT)
• Federal Security Bureau asks for more authority to control Internet Sean Donelan (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 16:15:32 EDT)
• Re: Internet email performance study aljuhani (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 16:21:07 EDT)
• Re: Internet email performance study Robert Beverly (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 16:42:22 EDT)
• RE: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 17:11:45 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 17:17:12 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 17:48:11 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 17:50:52 EDT)
• Re: Internet email performance study aljuhani (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 17:53:52 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 17:58:37 EDT)
• Fw: Internet email performance study aljuhani (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 17:59:27 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden John Dupuy (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 18:01:42 EDT)
• Re: Internet email performance study Crist Clark (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 18:05:55 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 18:13:06 EDT)
• Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP Owen DeLong (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 18:17:00 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden william(at)elan.net (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 18:17:12 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 18:22:43 EDT)
• Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 18:22:40 EDT)
• Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP Iljitsch van Beijnum (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 18:55:17 EDT)
• Re: Internet email performance study Crist Clark (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 18:53:27 EDT)
• Re: PAIX Outages Richard A Steenbergen (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 18:57:53 EDT)
• Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP Mark Owen (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 20:08:26 EDT)
• Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP Owen DeLong (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 21:12:25 EDT)
• Re: Federal Security Bureau asks for more authority to control Internet Dave Crocker (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 21:33:02 EDT)
• OT: calling Apple (apple.com) Paul G (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 01:30:13 EDT)
• Re: PAIX Outages Alexander Koch (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 02:33:49 EDT)
• RE: PAIX Outages Huopio Kauto (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 02:56:36 EDT)
• ICANN needs you! Rodney Joffe (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 03:01:36 EDT)
• NANOG going to be available over IPv6 ? Jeroen Massar (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 04:20:43 EDT)
• Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP Iljitsch van Beijnum (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 04:22:22 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Dave Rand (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 05:07:17 EDT)
• Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP Peter & Karin Dambier (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 06:00:15 EDT)
• Re: Federal Security Bureau asks for more authority to control Internet (no name) (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 06:43:09 EDT)
• Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP (no name) (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 07:03:15 EDT)
• Re: Federal Security Bureau asks for more authority to control Internet Suresh Ramasubramanian (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 07:18:14 EDT)
• Re: Federal Security Bureau asks for more authority to control Internet william(at)elan.net (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 07:45:34 EDT)
• Sinkhole Architecture Howard C. Berkowitz (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 07:59:57 EDT)
• The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 08:00:00 EDT)
• RE: PAIX Outages Neil J. McRae (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 08:04:05 EDT)
• Re: PAIX Outages Alexander Koch (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 08:08:13 EDT)
• Re: PAIX Outages Brandon Butterworth (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 08:24:06 EDT)
• Re: PAIX Outages Alexander Koch (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 08:31:36 EDT)
• Re: PAIX Outages Daniel Roesen (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 08:42:32 EDT)
• Re: PAIX Outages Brandon Butterworth (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 08:44:30 EDT)
• RE: PAIX Outages Neil J. McRae (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 09:25:07 EDT)
• Re: ICANN needs you! Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 09:12:03 EDT)
• Re: Sinkhole Architecture Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 09:34:19 EDT)
• Internet impact of Apple Tiger Irwin Lazar (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 10:02:02 EDT)
• Re: Internet impact of Apple Tiger Martin Hepworth (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 10:10:16 EDT)
• Re: Internet impact of Apple Tiger Irwin Lazar (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 10:14:41 EDT)
• Re: Internet impact of Apple Tiger (no name) (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 10:47:02 EDT)
• RE: Internet impact of Apple Tiger Mark Segal (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 10:49:37 EDT)
• Re: Sinkhole Architecture Howard C. Berkowitz (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 11:24:21 EDT)
• Re: ICANN needs you! John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 11:31:25 EDT)
• Re: Sinkhole Architecture Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 11:41:33 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Jay R. Ashworth (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 11:42:43 EDT)
• Re: BT to offer six classes of service (no name) (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 11:47:56 EDT)
• Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP Peter & Karin Dambier (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 12:47:25 EDT)
• RE: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP Neil J. McRae (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 13:04:37 EDT)
• Level3 Blip? Eric Whitehill (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 13:23:35 EDT)
• Re: Internet impact of Apple Tiger Florian Weimer (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 13:29:05 EDT)
• Re: Level3 Blip? Marshall Eubanks (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 13:37:18 EDT)
• RE: Level3 Blip? Chris Ranch (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 13:40:46 EDT)
• RE: Level3 Blip? Jason L. Schwab (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 13:44:25 EDT)
• RE: Level3 Blip? Jon Lewis (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 13:45:59 EDT)
• Weekly Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 14:07:16 EDT)
• (no subject) Steve Sobol (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 14:15:26 EDT)
• Business Inaction Could Lead to Cybersecurity Law Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 14:32:33 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Steven Champeon (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 15:27:36 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Barry Shein (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 16:09:24 EDT)
• Re: PAIX Outages Stephen J. Wilcox (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 16:29:22 EDT)
• Re: Level3 Blip? Tom Sands (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 16:34:37 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Steven Champeon (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 16:53:45 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Steven J. Sobol (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 17:23:08 EDT)
• OC3 to Gig-E conversion Peering (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 17:20:21 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Dave Rand (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 17:27:09 EDT)
• RE: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Miller, Mark (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 17:43:57 EDT)
• RE: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Miller, Mark (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 17:32:56 EDT)
• RE: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Steven J. Sobol (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 17:39:56 EDT)
• Hushmail DNS Attack Blamed on Network Solutions Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 19:03:51 EDT)
• Re: OC3 to Gig-E conversion Richard A Steenbergen (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 19:05:04 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Mark Andrews (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 19:48:17 EDT)
• RE: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Dave Rand (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 20:44:07 EDT)
• Re: Internet2 Vicky Rode (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 20:46:41 EDT)
• Re: OC3 to Gig-E conversion Miquel van Smoorenburg (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 21:45:24 EDT)
• Re: OC3 to Gig-E conversion Richard A Steenbergen (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 22:03:50 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Suresh Ramasubramanian (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 22:11:34 EDT)
• Re: Internet impact of Apple Tiger (no name) (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 23:52:41 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Dean Anderson (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 23:56:01 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Steven Champeon (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 00:00:27 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Dean Anderson (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 00:22:58 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Christopher L. Morrow (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 00:29:32 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Dean Anderson (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 00:57:46 EDT)
• watchdog of BIND server Joe Shen (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 04:48:58 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (no name) (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 05:39:06 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Nicholas Suan (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 05:57:11 EDT)
• Re: watchdog of BIND server Joe Abley (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 08:18:13 EDT)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? James (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 13:46:05 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Jay R. Ashworth (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 17:34:09 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Robert M. Enger (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 19:20:35 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 22:10:13 EDT)
• Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 23:32:04 EDT)

Last message date: Sat Apr 30 2005 - 23:34:51 EDT
Archived on: Sat Apr 30 2005 - 23:34:58 EDT

1158 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]