North American Network Operators 0504
By Author

1158 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]

Starting: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 01:08:17 EST
Ending: Sat Apr 30 2005 - 23:34:51 EDT

• (no email)
  • RE: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 17:26:29 EDT)
• (no name)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 05:39:06 EDT)
  • Re: Internet impact of Apple Tiger (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 23:52:41 EDT)
  • Re: BT to offer six classes of service (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 11:47:56 EDT)
  • Re: Internet impact of Apple Tiger (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 10:47:02 EDT)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 08:00:00 EDT)
  • Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 07:03:15 EDT)
  • Re: Federal Security Bureau asks for more authority to control Internet (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 06:43:09 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 11:51:23 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:44:34 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:31:28 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:30:48 EDT)
  • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:52:04 EDT)
  • Re: Port 25 - Blacklash (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 12:45:31 EDT)
  • bearing burdens (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 06:40:17 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 06:31:40 EDT)
  • clarity (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:39:52 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 02:36:54 EDT)
  • Re: Port 25 - Blacklash (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:47:56 EDT)
  • Re: Port 25 - Blacklash (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 16:30:55 EDT)
  • Anyone from Verizon familiar with physical plant in PHL (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 13:36:58 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 03:10:41 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 00:55:27 EDT)
  • versions, filtering, and access OH MY!! (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 03:40:41 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 16:23:00 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 05:24:37 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 05:07:03 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 02:00:48 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 17:23:38 EDT)
  • Re: Dual rackmountable power supply? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 20:06:54 EDT)
  • Re: Root DNS servers (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 11:43:50 EDT)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 08:00:00 EDT)
  • Re: Getting a BGP table in to a lab (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 01:36:54 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 16:04:45 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 15:30:45 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 14:51:07 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 05:34:11 EDT)
  • Re: N+? redundancy (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 12:24:52 EDT)
  • Re: N+? redundancy (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 12:07:06 EDT)
  • DSCP ECN bits (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 06:27:33 EDT)
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 05:05:28 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 04:53:32 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 04:47:48 EDT)
  • RE: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 13:36:23 EDT)
  • Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 13:33:09 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 15:06:17 EDT)
  • N+? redundancy (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 14:00:47 EDT)
  • cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 13:57:59 EDT)
  • Re: N+? redundancy (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 12:10:35 EDT)
  • N+? redundancy (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 09:31:19 EDT)
  • RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 08:29:28 EDT)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 08:00:00 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 06:34:17 EDT)
  • Re: SONET (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:25:42 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:34:53 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:26:36 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 09:33:20 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 06:03:24 EDT)
  • Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 16:50:19 EDT)
  • Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 06:20:25 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 17:18:20 EDT)
  • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 07:23:35 EDT)
  • Maybe OT: MPLS QOS SLA Monitoring (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 09:43:31 EDT)
  • Re: Blog... (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 06:10:53 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 01:34:18 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 03:29:36 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 23:54:07 EDT)
  • Re: Weekly Routing Table Report (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 17:00:29 EDT)
  • Re: AS prepending (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 10:33:08 EDT)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 08:00:00 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 06:00:29 EDT)
  • Re: botted hosts (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:33:29 EDT)
  • Re: botted hosts (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:12:47 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:42:37 EST)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 07:58:39 EST)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 07:00:00 EST)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 06:34:13 EST)
  • P2P Usage Increases was: (Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 05:57:28 EST)
  • Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 05:33:38 EST)
• Aaron Glenn
  • Hostway Network Security Contact (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 21:24:15 EDT)
• Adam Jacob Muller
  • Re: Another panix.com scenario? Hushmail this time (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 11:38:34 EDT)
  • Re: Port 25 - Blacklash (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 14:17:55 EDT)
  • Spam (un)blocking (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 14:54:08 EDT)
• Adam McKenna
  • Re: Internet2 (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:48:37 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 23:37:23 EDT)
• Adi Linden
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:21:59 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:17:53 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:09:16 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:01:26 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 09:53:13 EDT)
  • Re: New worm? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 11:11:43 EDT)
  • Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:30:56 EST)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:22:37 EST)
• Adrian Chadd
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 09:03:07 EDT)
• Alex Bligh
  • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 09:17:33 EDT)
  • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 05:00:10 EDT)
  • Re: ICMP Vulnerability (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 11:59:49 EDT)
  • Re: Reports or data on data centres without access to competitive fibre (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 05:28:33 EDT)
  • RE: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:15:03 EST)
• Alex Campbell
  • Router choice for medium size hosting provider (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 20:03:03 EDT)
• Alex Rubenstein
  • Re: Ameritrade warns 200,000 clients of lost data (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 15:49:46 EDT)
  • Re: Ameritrade warns 200,000 clients of lost data (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 15:44:28 EDT)
  • Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competition (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 14:23:34 EDT)
  • Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competition (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 14:05:02 EDT)
  • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 09:07:40 EDT)
  • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 16:53:29 EDT)
• Alexander Kiwerski
  • RE: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:35:02 EDT)
  • RE: Weekly Routing Table Report (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 17:42:18 EDT)
  • RE: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:05:33 EST)
• Alexander Koch
  • Re: PAIX Outages (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 08:31:36 EDT)
  • Re: PAIX Outages (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 08:08:13 EDT)
  • Re: PAIX Outages (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 02:33:49 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 15:47:12 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 09:43:16 EDT)
• Alexei Roudnev
  • Re: Port 25 - Blacklash (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 04:11:03 EDT)
  • Re: ICMP Vulnerability (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 03:09:24 EDT)
• aljuhani
  • Fw: Internet email performance study (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 17:59:27 EDT)
  • Re: Internet email performance study (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 17:53:52 EDT)
  • Re: Internet email performance study (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 16:21:07 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 12:30:58 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 15:39:57 EDT)
• Andre Oppermann
  • Re: Getting a BGP table in to a lab (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 17:36:03 EDT)
• Andrew - Supernews
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 16:06:04 EDT)
• Andrew D Kirch
  • Re: SORBS Identity theft alert (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 03:11:30 EDT)
• Andrew Dul
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 12:02:32 EDT)
• Andrew Odlyzko
  • Re: cost of doing business (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 13:54:52 EDT)
  • P2P Usage Increases was: (Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 06:22:11 EST)
• Andy Grosser
  • RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:51:27 EST)
• Andy Johnson
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 14:03:14 EDT)
  • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 17:08:51 EDT)
• Arnold Nipper
  • Re: Dual rackmountable power supply? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 18:39:07 EDT)
  • Re: Getting a BGP table in to a lab (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 17:08:38 EDT)
• Austin McKinley
  • [Fwd: Re: [Full-disclosure] Possible Virus activity] (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 10:57:27 EDT)
• Barry Shein
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 16:09:24 EDT)
• Bill Nash
  • RE: Getting a BGP table in to a lab (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 20:47:13 EDT)
  • Re: AUP for NANOG? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 14:56:05 EDT)
  • Re: Maybe OT: MPLS QOS SLA Monitoring (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 13:58:29 EDT)
  • Re: SORBS Identity theft alert (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 13:05:48 EDT)
  • Re: SORBS Identity theft alert (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 02:51:54 EDT)
  • Re: Network-Automation discussion mailing list created (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 18:26:26 EDT)
  • Re: Network-Automation discussion mailing list created (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 18:15:06 EDT)
  • Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:05:34 EST)
  • RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:09:12 EST)
  • Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:33:16 EST)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:30:19 EST)
  • Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:28:01 EST)
• Bill Stewart
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 20:41:36 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 20:08:45 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 04:35:11 EDT)
  • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 04:22:58 EDT)
  • Re: Six PCs caused BigPond problems (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 01:49:28 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 20:37:06 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 20:25:12 EDT)
  • Re: Router choice for medium size hosting provider (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 01:25:35 EDT)
• Bill Woodcock
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 16:32:43 EDT)
  • Re: INOC-DBA Phone (was Re: Comcast Contact) (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 00:59:18 EDT)
  • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:32:09 EDT)
  • Re: Blog... (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 21:33:43 EDT)
  • Re: Router choice for medium size hosting provider (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 16:22:41 EDT)
  • Re: Router choice for medium size hosting provider (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 20:19:32 EDT)
  • Re: report of .biz outage... (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 11:28:00 EDT)
  • Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:45:16 EST)
  • Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:33:56 EST)
• bob
  • Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:47:36 EST)
• Brandon Butterworth
  • Re: PAIX Outages (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 08:44:30 EDT)
  • Re: PAIX Outages (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 08:24:06 EDT)
  • Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 19:30:41 EDT)
  • Re: rack-mount tool drawers/chests? (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 10:11:49 EDT)
• Brandon Ross
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 09:42:33 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 19:16:15 EDT)
  • RE: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 19:14:23 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 19:09:03 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 09:48:34 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 14:36:13 EDT)
• Brent Chapman
  • Re: Network-Automation discussion mailing list created (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 19:55:44 EDT)
  • Re: Network-Automation discussion mailing list created (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 19:18:04 EDT)
  • Network-Automation discussion mailing list created (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 18:56:44 EDT)
• Bruce Pinsky
  • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 16:52:38 EDT)
  • Re: Blog... (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 13:50:59 EDT)
• Chris Adams
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 14:20:41 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 14:02:46 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 13:35:17 EDT)
• Chris Boyd
  • Re: New worm? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 01:22:16 EDT)
  • Re: New worm? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 00:29:54 EDT)
  • New worm? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 00:11:41 EDT)
  • Re: Blog... (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 00:13:21 EDT)
• Chris Kuethe
  • Re: AUP for NANOG? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 11:36:27 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 20:19:31 EDT)
• Chris Ranch
  • RE: Level3 Blip? (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 13:40:46 EDT)
• Chris Woodfield
  • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 14:36:55 EDT)
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 13:14:58 EDT)
• Christopher L. Morrow
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 00:29:32 EDT)
  • Re: Sinkhole Architecture (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 11:41:33 EDT)
  • Re: Sinkhole Architecture (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 09:34:19 EDT)
  • Re: The "not long discussion" thread.... (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 21:47:36 EDT)
  • Re: The "not long discussion" thread.... (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 22:59:21 EDT)
  • Re: using TCP53 for DNS (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:13:27 EDT)
  • Re: using TCP53 for DNS (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 15:01:47 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 10:34:08 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 09:58:29 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 09:22:41 EDT)
  • RE: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 19:15:21 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 23:44:28 EDT)
  • Re: Root DNS Servers 2 (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 11:47:57 EDT)
  • Re: New worm? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 01:26:50 EDT)
  • Re: New worm? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 01:13:04 EDT)
  • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 17:26:33 EDT)
  • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 22:38:56 EDT)
  • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 22:24:06 EDT)
  • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 22:19:11 EDT)
  • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 22:17:47 EDT)
  • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 12:16:33 EDT)
  • Re: RFC1918 in-addr.arpa local copies (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 00:06:40 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:27:05 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 15:17:26 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 10:37:57 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 00:39:43 EDT)
  • Re: Port 0 traffic (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 23:26:28 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 23:05:20 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 14:04:44 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 13:11:43 EDT)
  • Re: botted hosts (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 23:16:29 EDT)
  • Re: botted hosts (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:08:51 EDT)
  • Re: botted hosts (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 11:27:02 EDT)
  • Re: Positioning technology (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 17:18:49 EST)
  • Re: Positioning technology (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:47:43 EST)
• Church, Chuck
  • RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:35:11 EST)
  • RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:54:08 EST)
• Cisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team
  • Cisco Security Advisory: Vulnerabilities in Cisco IOS Secure Shell Server (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 13:35:54 EDT)
  • Cisco Security Advisory: Vulnerabilities in the Internet Key Exchange Xauth Implementation (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 11:54:26 EDT)
• Crist Clark
  • Re: Internet email performance study (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 18:53:27 EDT)
  • Re: Internet email performance study (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 18:05:55 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 12:54:07 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 17:30:40 EDT)
• D. Campbell MacInnes
  • Any supply a live contact for mac.com? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 08:36:51 EDT)
• Dan Hollis
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 05:07:15 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:20:12 EDT)
  • Re: Internet2 (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:11:26 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 14:08:42 EDT)
  • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 18:58:56 EDT)
  • Re: SORBS Identity theft alert (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:48:53 EDT)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 17:11:57 EST)
• Dan Lockwood
  • RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 18:24:01 EDT)
  • RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 18:04:04 EDT)
  • Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 15:58:31 EDT)
• Daniel Golding
  • Re: Port 25 - Blacklash (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:50:11 EDT)
  • CircleID, was: Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 10:56:07 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 14:57:06 EDT)
  • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 13:13:49 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 16:37:32 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 08:59:07 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 22:12:36 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 15:51:44 EDT)
• Daniel Roesen
  • Re: PAIX Outages (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 08:42:32 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 14:33:03 EDT)
  • Re: Internet2 (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:17:17 EDT)
  • Re: Getting a BGP table in to a lab (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 17:49:09 EDT)
  • New international IPv6 operators forum (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 20:15:48 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 19:27:33 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 19:01:14 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 18:36:22 EDT)
  • Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure (Sat Apr 02 2005 - 07:29:34 EST)
• Daniel Senie
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 15:02:08 EDT)
  • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 15:39:49 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 14:24:50 EDT)
  • Re: Spam (un)blocking (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 18:43:07 EDT)
• Dave Crocker
  • Re: Federal Security Bureau asks for more authority to control Internet (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 21:33:02 EDT)
  • Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 12:24:13 EDT)
  • Re: Telcordia report on ICANN .net RFP Evaluation (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 01:07:16 EST)
• Dave Hilton
  • RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:15:55 EST)
  • RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:44:08 EST)
• Dave Rand
  • RE: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 20:44:07 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 17:27:09 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 05:07:17 EDT)
  • Re: Port 25 - Blacklash (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:59:50 EDT)
  • Re: Port 25 - Blacklash (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:10:33 EDT)
• David Barak
  • SONET (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:50:56 EDT)
  • Re: AS prepending (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 12:34:40 EDT)
  • Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:58:07 EST)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:12:00 EST)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 07:11:47 EST)
• David Conrad
  • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 02:14:06 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 15:14:10 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 13:13:17 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 04:14:14 EDT)
• David Gethings
  • Re: AS prepending (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 12:26:12 EDT)
  • Re: AS prepending (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 11:25:50 EDT)
• David Lesher
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 08:24:32 EDT)
  • Re: grrr (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 15:15:04 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 08:58:50 EDT)
• David Schwartz
  • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 18:49:13 EDT)
• Dean Anderson
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 00:57:46 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 00:22:58 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 23:56:01 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 16:13:22 EDT)
  • Re: [dnsop] Re: Root Anycast (fwd) (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 14:34:44 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 23:55:23 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 23:37:44 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 23:21:52 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 23:20:04 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 15:29:09 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (fwd) (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 14:41:38 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 14:13:33 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 14:00:00 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 05:28:44 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 17:48:57 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 17:05:30 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 17:01:44 EDT)
  • Re: ICMP Vulnerability (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 10:37:16 EDT)
  • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 10:19:36 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 17:30:15 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 17:15:45 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 17:06:06 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 16:53:26 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 16:41:53 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 13:27:26 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 12:49:39 EDT)
  • Re: SORBS Identity theft alert (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 07:13:22 EDT)
  • Re: SORBS Identity theft alert (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 06:57:49 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 03:03:37 EDT)
  • SORBS Identity theft alert (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 02:39:01 EDT)
  • Re: botted hosts (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 19:14:26 EDT)
  • Re: botted hosts (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:16:42 EDT)
• Deepak Jain
  • Partial Transit (was Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 19:00:20 EDT)
• Doug Barton
  • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 12:47:56 EDT)
  • New IPv6 allocations from IANA to RIPE NCC (2a00::/21) and ARIN (2600::/22, 2604::/22, 2608::/22, 260c::/22) (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 16:30:55 EDT)
  • Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 17:51:22 EDT)
  • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 04:39:05 EDT)
  • New block of AS Numbers to AfriNIC (36864 - 37887) (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 22:46:44 EDT)
  • New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 22:42:55 EDT)
  • New IANA IPv4 allocation for ARIN (73/8) (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 18:36:38 EDT)
• Doug Legge
  • RE: MD5 for TCP/BGP Sessions (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 12:03:27 EDT)
• Douglas Dever
  • Re: Internet2 (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:45:11 EDT)
• Douglas Otis
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:08:32 EDT)
  • Re: Promosis? Who are these guys? (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 14:09:24 EDT)
  • Re: Ameritrade warns 200,000 clients of lost data (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 16:16:36 EDT)
• Dragos Ruiu
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:13:16 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 20:44:21 EDT)
• Drew Weaver
  • Anyone from btnaccess.com on the list please ping me? (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 00:46:54 EDT)
• Duane Wessels
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 12:39:59 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 12:00:04 EDT)
• Edward B. Dreger
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 13:07:41 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 12:59:20 EDT)
  • Re: SORBS Identity theft alert (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 03:15:55 EDT)
• Edward Lewis
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 09:25:55 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 09:46:57 EDT)
  • Re: AUP for NANOG? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 11:32:45 EDT)
  • Re: report of .biz outage... (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 10:58:53 EDT)
  • Re: Telcordia report on ICANN .net RFP Evaluation (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 10:22:12 EST)
• Ejay Hire
  • Botted Hosts tracking, v0.01alpha (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 17:22:55 EDT)
  • RE: botted hosts (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 14:12:38 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:59:49 EST)
• Elmar K. Bins
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:50:21 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:45:13 EDT)
  • Re: SORBS Identity theft alert (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 03:16:53 EDT)
  • Re: RIPE50: Peering BoF (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 04:52:36 EDT)
  • Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure (Sat Apr 02 2005 - 06:48:51 EST)
  • Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 03:15:03 EST)
• Eric A. Hall
  • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 23:43:43 EDT)
  • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 23:20:05 EDT)
  • Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 14:55:35 EDT)
  • Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 11:49:53 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 23:52:54 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 14:31:07 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 14:17:01 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 13:43:40 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 21:20:15 EDT)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 03:35:47 EST)
• Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
  • Re: ICANN needs you! (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 09:12:03 EDT)
  • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 11:33:52 EDT)
  • fwd: Cobell lawyers ask trust systems be shutdown again (3rd time) (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 21:39:30 EDT)
  • Re: Blog... (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 16:03:08 EDT)
  • Re: report of .biz outage... (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 11:00:45 EDT)
  • Re: report of .biz outage... (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 10:03:55 EDT)
  • Re: Telcordia report on ICANN .net RFP Evaluation (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:54:03 EST)
  • Re: Telcordia report on ICANN .net RFP Evaluation (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:32:14 EST)
• Eric Gauthier
  • Re: FW: Port 25 - Blacklash (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 14:03:42 EDT)
• Eric Louie
  • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 14:17:13 EDT)
• Eric Pylko
  • RE: books every network operator should read? (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 21:32:14 EDT)
• Eric Whitehill
  • Level3 Blip? (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 13:23:35 EDT)
• Erik Amundson
  • RE: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 13:45:57 EDT)
• Etaoin Shrdlu
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 20:26:44 EDT)
• Fergie (Paul Ferguson)
  • Hushmail DNS Attack Blamed on Network Solutions (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 19:03:51 EDT)
  • Business Inaction Could Lead to Cybersecurity Law (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 14:32:33 EDT)
  • Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 18:22:40 EDT)
  • Re: BT to offer six classes of service (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 12:14:37 EDT)
  • FCC To Require 911 for VoIP (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 12:45:23 EDT)
  • BT to offer six classes of service (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 12:02:59 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:52:30 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:10:08 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 15:05:18 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 15:02:29 EDT)
  • Re: Detecting VoIP traffic in ISP network (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 14:26:41 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 09:40:40 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 08:26:10 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 08:06:29 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 02:06:22 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 01:46:24 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 01:38:27 EDT)
  • Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 23:09:06 EDT)
  • FCC Chief Wants 911 Service for Internet Phones (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 21:31:42 EDT)
  • Sheet could shelter Wi-Fi from eavesdroppers (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 18:50:05 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 22:37:21 EDT)
  • RE: Getting a BGP table in to a lab (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 20:46:49 EDT)
  • Verizon's DSL Still Partially Clothed (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 18:47:36 EDT)
  • Re: Ameritrade warns 200,000 clients of lost data (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 16:08:49 EDT)
  • Ameritrade warns 200,000 clients of lost data (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 15:28:14 EDT)
  • Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 11:47:09 EDT)
  • Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competition (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 22:56:19 EDT)
  • Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 16:32:02 EDT)
  • Security Concerns Boosted VeriSign's Dot-Net Bid (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 10:21:34 EDT)
  • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 13:01:09 EDT)
  • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 12:39:08 EDT)
  • Today's tech news highlights.... (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 19:15:49 EDT)
  • Re: Six PCs caused BigPond problems (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 08:46:17 EDT)
  • Today's tech news highlights (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 19:35:24 EDT)
  • Today's tech news highlights (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 21:16:14 EDT)
  • Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocati on (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 11:57:45 EDT)
  • New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 10:15:50 EDT)
  • Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 20:25:45 EDT)
  • Fwd: [e2e] Wisconsin network research lab now openly available (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 18:21:57 EDT)
  • Today's tech news highlights.... (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 16:33:55 EDT)
  • ID theft rabbit hole gets deeper.... (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 11:56:16 EDT)
  • Today's tech highlights (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 20:59:11 EDT)
  • Re: Blog... (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 12:39:45 EDT)
  • Blog... (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 15:34:54 EDT)
  • Re: DNS cache poisoning update (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 16:55:49 EDT)
  • DNS cache poisoning update (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 16:43:33 EDT)
  • ICANN's Questionable Deals Coming Under Attack (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 20:12:15 EDT)
  • The Register: .NET report was fudged (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 19:21:12 EDT)
  • Community Experiences with the InterNIC Whois Data Problem Reports Sys tem (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:04:00 EST)
  • .net report slammed again (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:53:14 EST)
  • Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 11:45:17 EST)
  • RFC 4041 (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 09:21:54 EST)
• Florian Weimer
  • Re: Internet impact of Apple Tiger (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 13:29:05 EDT)
  • Re: Internet2 (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:58:50 EDT)
  • Re: using TCP53 for DNS (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 15:09:20 EDT)
  • Re: Port 25 - Blacklash (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 14:47:24 EDT)
  • Re: using TCP53 for DNS (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 14:45:16 EDT)
  • Re: DNS Round Robin (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 19:11:14 EDT)
  • Re: Promosis? Who are these guys? (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 05:11:10 EDT)
  • Re: Ameritrade warns 200,000 clients of lost data (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 15:53:21 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 15:46:48 EDT)
  • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 15:49:09 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 15:45:54 EDT)
  • Re: grrr (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 15:22:24 EDT)
  • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 12:51:04 EDT)
  • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 12:29:27 EDT)
  • Re: Spam (un)blocking (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 05:12:02 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 21:03:33 EDT)
  • Re: botted hosts (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 18:36:37 EDT)
  • Re: botted hosts (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:46:36 EDT)
  • Re: botted hosts (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:48:46 EDT)
  • Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:41:55 EDT)
  • Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:21:49 EDT)
  • Re: botted hosts (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:01:38 EDT)
  • Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 06:02:19 EST)
• Forrest W. Christian
  • RFC1918 in-addr.arpa local copies (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 23:55:37 EDT)
• Frank Coluccio
  • NPR program: "The Internet as a public utility" (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 20:48:03 EDT)
• Fredy Kuenzler
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 12:34:18 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 14:10:54 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 09:54:01 EDT)
  • (half OT) Tool for ASN statistic freaks: webalizer_asn (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 11:26:44 EDT)
• Frotzler, Florian
  • RE: Getting a BGP table in to a lab (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 04:35:02 EDT)
• Gadi Evron
  • Re: article: port 25 blocking (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 05:55:09 EDT)
  • article: port 25 blocking (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 00:38:31 EDT)
  • Re: clued/interested LEO list (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 02:06:53 EDT)
  • Re: clued/interested LEO list (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 02:04:03 EDT)
  • Re: clued/interested LEO list (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 14:37:41 EDT)
  • clued/interested LEO list (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 06:45:10 EDT)
  • new operational mailing list - snort signatures for ISP's (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 04:19:25 EDT)
  • Re: DNS cache poisoning update (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 16:41:26 EDT)
  • ping from the arone armies list (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 16:30:08 EDT)
• Gary E. Miller
  • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 16:49:57 EDT)
• German Martinez
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 18:52:49 EDT)
• Gordon Cook
  • Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 21:21:40 EDT)
• Graeme Clark
  • RE: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 16:08:01 EDT)
  • RE: Root DNS servers (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 17:52:24 EDT)
• Greg Boehnlein
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 10:47:11 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 08:13:51 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 08:06:51 EDT)
• Greg Schwimer
  • Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 14:34:54 EDT)
  • RE: Root DNS Servers 2 (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 11:48:10 EDT)
• Gregory Hicks
  • Re: AUP for NANOG? (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 13:09:41 EDT)
• Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr
  • Re: ICMP Vulnerability (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 12:10:12 EDT)
  • Re: ICMP Vulnerability (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 11:58:48 EDT)
  • Re: ICMP Vulnerability (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 11:57:23 EDT)
• Hank Nussbacher
  • Re: Port 25 - Blacklash (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 14:49:24 EDT)
  • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 02:46:49 EDT)
  • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 01:58:09 EDT)
  • Re: clued/interested LEO list (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 01:31:49 EDT)
  • Re: AS prepending (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 16:33:37 EDT)
  • Re: Spam (un)blocking (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 02:15:46 EDT)
• Hannigan, Martin
  • RE: Port 25 - Blacklash (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 14:27:07 EDT)
  • RE: Port 25 - Blacklash (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 12:14:45 EDT)
  • RE: Dual rackmountable power supply? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 20:43:24 EDT)
  • RE: Root DNS servers (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 20:06:42 EDT)
  • RE: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 11:50:33 EDT)
  • RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 08:00:14 EDT)
  • RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:53:20 EDT)
  • RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:34:56 EDT)
  • RE: AUP for NANOG? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 14:48:56 EDT)
  • RE: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 12:28:55 EDT)
  • ICMP Vulnerability (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 08:30:38 EDT)
  • RE: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Sun Apr 03 2005 - 13:48:02 EDT)
  • RE: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 19:44:20 EST)
• Howard C. Berkowitz
  • Re: Sinkhole Architecture (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 11:24:21 EDT)
  • Sinkhole Architecture (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 07:59:57 EDT)
• Howard, W. Lee
  • RE: Spam (un)blocking (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 09:21:49 EDT)
  • RE: BGP Anywhere - Global Redundancy (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 12:36:30 EDT)
  • RE: RFC 4041 (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:37:13 EST)
• Huopio Kauto
  • RE: PAIX Outages (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 02:56:36 EDT)
• Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 04:22:22 EDT)
  • Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 18:55:17 EDT)
  • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 13:36:17 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 11:43:02 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:10:54 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:06:00 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 03:17:42 EDT)
• Irwin Lazar
  • Re: Internet impact of Apple Tiger (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 10:14:41 EDT)
  • Internet impact of Apple Tiger (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 10:02:02 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 13:23:23 EDT)
• J.D. Falk
  • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 16:00:30 EDT)
  • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 13:05:01 EDT)
  • Re: SORBS Identity theft alert (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 13:38:37 EDT)
  • Re: Spam (un)blocking (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 15:09:34 EDT)
• James
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 13:46:05 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 17:09:52 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 00:29:52 EDT)
• James Baldwin
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 12:18:17 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:47:50 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 17:09:00 EDT)
• Janet Sullivan
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 00:15:10 EDT)
  • books every network operator should read? (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 00:36:54 EDT)
• Jared Mauch
  • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 17:02:12 EDT)
  • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 10:29:25 EDT)
• Jason Frisvold
  • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 16:07:07 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 16:05:20 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 15:05:55 EDT)
• Jason L. Schwab
  • RE: Level3 Blip? (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 13:44:25 EDT)
• Jason Slagle
  • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 10:09:37 EDT)
• Jay Ford
  • Re: Internet2 (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 18:16:44 EDT)
• Jay Hennigan
  • RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:29:14 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:14:52 EST)
• Jay Patel
  • PAIX Outages (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 10:45:15 EDT)
• Jay R. Ashworth
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 17:34:09 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 11:42:43 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 14:11:28 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 17:50:46 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 13:43:53 EDT)
  • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 13:47:39 EDT)
  • Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 11:45:06 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 14:39:21 EDT)
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 17:35:06 EDT)
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 15:43:50 EDT)
  • Best Practices Knowledge Capture (was: Re: AUP for NANOG?) (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 12:53:13 EDT)
  • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 13:03:10 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 12:57:08 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 12:53:30 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 12:51:40 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 12:49:16 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 22:24:34 EDT)
  • Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance (Sun Apr 03 2005 - 15:07:13 EDT)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Sun Apr 03 2005 - 15:00:07 EDT)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:15:22 EST)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:29:33 EST)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:19:59 EST)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:10:16 EST)
  • Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:53:55 EST)
  • Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:46:41 EST)
  • Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:39:55 EST)
  • Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:31:26 EST)
  • Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 11:42:25 EST)
  • Re: outage/maintenance window opinion (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 11:31:38 EST)
• JC Dill
  • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 15:48:23 EDT)
  • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 11:45:40 EDT)
• Jeff Cole
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 23:28:03 EDT)
• Jeff Kell
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 21:24:09 EDT)
• Jeff Rosowski
  • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 17:05:25 EDT)
• Jeffrey I. Schiller
  • NOC-DBA Phone (was Re: Comcast Contact) (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 00:21:39 EDT)
• Jeroen Massar
  • NANOG going to be available over IPv6 ? (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 04:20:43 EDT)
  • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 04:14:05 EDT)
• Jerry Pasker
  • Re: The "not long discussion" thread.... (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 04:51:01 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 00:46:48 EDT)
  • The "not long discussion" thread.... (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 15:44:28 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 02:14:28 EDT)
  • Re: grrr (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 15:28:23 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 01:45:13 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 01:13:08 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 18:09:47 EDT)
• Jim McBurnett
  • Hotmail-- Again?? (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 11:13:31 EDT)
• Jim Popovitch
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 12:11:55 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:19:13 EDT)
  • RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:31:52 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 14:59:38 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 18:31:33 EDT)
• Joe Abley
  • Re: watchdog of BIND server (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 08:18:13 EDT)
  • Re: cost of doing business (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 12:13:38 EDT)
  • Re: cost of doing business (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 11:25:16 EDT)
• Joe Loiacono
  • Re: Weekly Routing Table Report (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 16:48:53 EDT)
• Joe Maimon
  • Re: Port 25 - Blacklash (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 10:59:16 EDT)
• joe mcguckin
  • Re: clued/interested LEO list (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 15:16:44 EDT)
• Joe Provo
  • Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:02:06 EST)
• Joe Shen
  • watchdog of BIND server (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 04:48:58 EDT)
  • Re: Detecting VoIP traffic in ISP network (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 21:09:00 EDT)
  • Detecting VoIP traffic in ISP network (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:15:31 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 02:56:10 EDT)
• Joel Jaeggli
  • Re: Port 25 - Blacklash (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 04:47:59 EDT)
  • Re: Positioning technology (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:58:02 EST)
  • Re: Positioning technology (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:15:46 EST)
• John Clarke
  • Re: clarity (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 06:28:50 EDT)
• John Dupuy
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 18:01:42 EDT)
  • Re: AUP for NANOG? (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 14:13:15 EDT)
  • Re: botted hosts (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:45:01 EDT)
• John Kinsella
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 18:44:43 EDT)
• John Kristoff
  • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 20:25:07 EDT)
  • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 15:04:06 EDT)
  • Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:00:22 EST)
• John Levine
  • Re: Postini Problems? (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 10:21:53 EDT)
• John Palmer
  • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 17:57:32 EDT)
  • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 16:22:28 EDT)
• John Palmer (NANOG Acct)
  • Re: ICANN needs you! (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 11:31:25 EDT)
• John Payne
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 14:55:25 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 18:45:58 EDT)
• John van Oppen
  • AW: Dual rackmountable power supply? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 18:45:46 EDT)
  • AW: Getting a BGP table in to a lab (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 17:24:59 EDT)
  • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 02:10:54 EDT)
  • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 22:49:27 EDT)
  • Netlantis --- is it ever coming back? (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 03:17:20 EDT)
• Jon Lewis
  • RE: Level3 Blip? (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 13:45:59 EDT)
  • Re: New worm? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 00:28:23 EDT)
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 15:58:49 EDT)
  • Re: AS prepending (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 11:27:13 EDT)
  • Re: AS prepending (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 10:46:28 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 14:21:45 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 14:02:11 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 13:05:02 EDT)
• Jonas Frey
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 22:36:22 EDT)
  • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 06:48:52 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 09:42:03 EDT)
  • OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 09:33:55 EDT)
• Jonathan M. Slivko
  • cox communications contact please? (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 14:14:11 EDT)
• Joseph Nuara
  • Root DNS Servers 2 (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 11:38:20 EDT)
  • Root DNS servers (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 11:16:05 EDT)
• Joseph W. Breu
  • ATT.net Security Contact (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 16:39:59 EDT)
• JP Velders
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 18:15:51 EDT)
  • Re: Spam (un)blocking (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 18:10:43 EDT)
• just me
  • Yahoo mail ops contact (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 20:00:08 EDT)
  • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 17:35:04 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 14:49:42 EDT)
  • Re: grrr (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 14:34:19 EDT)
  • RE: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 16:07:09 EDT)
  • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 20:49:41 EDT)
  • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:43:59 EDT)
  • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:29:03 EDT)
  • RE: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:13:31 EDT)
  • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:06:17 EDT)
  • Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 13:51:45 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 18:19:34 EDT)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:03:17 EST)
• Justin M. Streiner
  • Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competition (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 15:08:51 EDT)
  • Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competition (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 12:42:26 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 20:34:50 EDT)
  • cable management systems (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 17:17:32 EST)
• Kevin Loch
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 08:51:24 EDT)
• Kevin Oberman
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:41:46 EDT)
  • Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 17:13:53 EST)
  • Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 17:09:08 EST)
• Kim Onnel
  • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 14:51:21 EDT)
  • BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 07:28:21 EDT)
  • Re: books every network operator should read? (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 05:55:29 EDT)
  • Re: BGP Anywhere - Global Redundancy (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 06:21:45 EDT)
• Lanny Jason Godsey
  • Postini Problems? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 18:04:51 EDT)
• Larry Smith
  • Re: Spam (un)blocking (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 16:03:59 EDT)
• Leo Bicknell
  • Re: PAIX Outages (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 14:11:40 EDT)
  • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:14:53 EDT)
• leo vegoda
  • RIPE NCC to begin allocating from 87/8 (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 15:06:26 EDT)
• Luke Youngblood
  • RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:15:41 EDT)
  • RE: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 14:34:08 EDT)
• Majdi S. Abbas
  • Re: PAIX Outages (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 15:13:54 EDT)
• Malayter, Christopher
  • IX Panel for Seattle (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 03:08:07 EDT)
  • RE: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 14:24:32 EDT)
  • RE: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 18:51:48 EDT)
• Mark Andrews
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 19:48:17 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 00:33:33 EDT)
• Mark Boolootian
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 17:17:52 EDT)
• Mark Borchers
  • RE: rack-mount tool drawers/chests? (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 09:41:36 EDT)
• Mark Newton
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 03:08:00 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 02:37:32 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 02:12:49 EDT)
• Mark Owen
  • Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 20:08:26 EDT)
• Mark Radabaugh
  • Re: Microsoft SOHO router multicast problem? - or maybe it's just doing what it's supposed to be doing... (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 03:47:02 EDT)
  • Microsoft SOHO router multicast problem? - or maybe it's just doing what it's supposed to be doing... (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 23:48:10 EDT)
  • Re: Router choice for medium size hosting provider (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 20:14:06 EDT)
• Mark Segal
  • RE: Internet impact of Apple Tiger (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 10:49:37 EDT)
• Markus Stumpf
  • Re: Spam (un)blocking (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 19:18:57 EDT)
• MARLON BORBA
  • Re: books every network operator should read? (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 09:23:48 EDT)
  • Peribit "sequence reducers" -- do they worth the investment? (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 21:08:29 EST)
• Marshall Eubanks
  • Re: Level3 Blip? (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 13:37:18 EDT)
  • Re: cost of doing business (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 13:27:26 EDT)
  • Re: cost of doing business (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 09:28:19 EDT)
  • Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 15:16:04 EDT)
• Martin Hepworth
  • Re: Internet impact of Apple Tiger (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 10:10:16 EDT)
  • Re: Sheet could shelter Wi-Fi from eavesdroppers (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:43:10 EDT)
  • Re: Postini Problems? (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 07:00:48 EDT)
• Martin J. Levy
  • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 15:35:21 EDT)
• Mathieu Arnold
  • Re: Netlantis --- is it ever coming back? (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 05:32:24 EDT)
• Matt Buford
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (fwd) (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 16:15:46 EDT)
• Matt Ghali
  • Re: FW: Port 25 - Blacklash (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 13:53:28 EDT)
• Matt Larson
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 21:58:58 EDT)
• Matt Taber
  • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 10:12:19 EDT)
  • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 08:44:09 EDT)
• Matthew Black
  • AUP for NANOG? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 10:48:42 EDT)
  • Re: Hotmail-- Again?? (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 10:22:18 EDT)
  • Re: Hotmail-- Again?? (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 13:38:24 EDT)
• Matthew Crocker
  • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:54:32 EDT)
• Matthew S. Hallacy
  • Re: Port 25 - Blacklash (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 11:53:37 EDT)
  • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:23:53 EDT)
• Matthew Sullivan
  • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 00:16:35 EDT)
  • Re: SORBS Identity theft alert (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 10:40:36 EDT)
• Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
  • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 13:20:07 EDT)
  • Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 18:18:57 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 19:07:46 EDT)
• Michael Loftis
  • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 02:53:32 EDT)
• Michael Moscovitch
  • Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:27:13 EST)
• Michael Sinatra
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 02:42:23 EDT)
• Mikael Abrahamsson
  • Re: Internet2 (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:18:08 EDT)
  • Re: Internet2 (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 16:53:14 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 15:16:10 EDT)
  • Re: cost of doing business (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 11:33:37 EDT)
  • Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 01:21:09 EDT)
  • RE: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 15:27:41 EDT)
  • Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 13:55:03 EDT)
  • Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 04:17:26 EDT)
  • cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 12:32:40 EDT)
  • Re: Today's tech news highlights.... (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 00:46:33 EDT)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 01:34:41 EST)
• Mike Hyde
  • Load balance over multiple bgp feeds (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 19:47:36 EDT)
• Mike Leber
  • Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 03:15:38 EDT)
• Mike Sawicki
  • Dual rackmountable power supply? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 18:33:51 EDT)
• Mike Tancsa
  • Re: ATT.net Security Contact (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 17:25:49 EDT)
• Miller, Mark
  • RE: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 17:32:56 EDT)
  • RE: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 17:43:57 EDT)
• Miquel van Smoorenburg
  • Re: OC3 to Gig-E conversion (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 21:45:24 EDT)
• Nathan Ward
  • Re: Getting a BGP table in to a lab (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 23:22:05 EDT)
  • Re: Getting a BGP table in to a lab (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 17:56:23 EDT)
  • Getting a BGP table in to a lab (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 20:34:46 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 21:46:25 EDT)
• Neil J. McRae
  • RE: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 13:04:37 EDT)
  • RE: PAIX Outages (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 09:25:07 EDT)
  • RE: PAIX Outages (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 08:04:05 EDT)
  • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 09:29:00 EDT)
  • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 05:59:11 EDT)
  • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:58:08 EDT)
  • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 15:19:41 EDT)
  • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 10:16:04 EDT)
  • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 09:44:56 EDT)
  • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 09:43:49 EDT)
  • RE: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 17:51:14 EDT)
• Nicholas Suan
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 05:57:11 EDT)
• Nicole
  • US still leads global spam list according to BBC article (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 17:03:42 EDT)
• Niek
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 22:17:44 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 21:56:15 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 20:43:14 EDT)
• Niels Bakker
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 18:29:04 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 07:47:10 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 08:46:30 EDT)
  • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 07:38:05 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 10:48:57 EDT)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 08:02:56 EST)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 07:11:45 EST)
• Nils Ketelsen
  • Re: using TCP53 for DNS (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 03:25:47 EDT)
  • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 02:51:14 EDT)
• Okan Demirmen
  • Re: Getting a BGP table in to a lab (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 11:31:23 EDT)
• Olivier Bonaventure
  • Re: Load balance over multiple bgp feeds (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 03:15:40 EDT)
• Olsen, Jason
  • RE: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 09:03:57 EDT)
• Owen DeLong
  • Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 21:12:25 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 18:22:43 EDT)
  • Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 18:17:00 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 18:13:06 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 17:58:37 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 17:50:52 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 17:48:11 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 17:17:12 EDT)
  • RE: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 17:11:45 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 02:48:39 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 00:55:11 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 19:22:47 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:33:10 EDT)
  • Re: clarity (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:10:24 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:08:41 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 15:56:00 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 15:47:51 EDT)
  • Re: clarity (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 07:12:57 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 06:43:00 EDT)
  • Re: clarity (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 06:19:04 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 06:13:01 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 06:09:24 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 06:07:47 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 01:42:53 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 01:38:00 EDT)
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 17:25:19 EDT)
  • Re: grrr (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 17:15:41 EDT)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 19:09:36 EST)
  • Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 19:08:08 EST)
  • RE: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 18:26:43 EST)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:45:07 EST)
• Pascal Gloor
  • Re: Netlantis --- is it ever coming back? (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 08:11:30 EDT)
• Patrick W Gilmore
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 09:54:14 EDT)
  • Re: Six PCs caused BigPond problems (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 01:44:19 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 01:31:00 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:29:46 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:12:15 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:07:37 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:13:33 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 13:11:56 EDT)
  • Re: AS prepending (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 10:34:05 EDT)
  • Re: Telcordia report on ICANN .net RFP Evaluation (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 08:48:55 EST)
• Patrick W. Gilmore
  • Re: Internet2 (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:22:59 EDT)
  • Re: using TCP53 for DNS (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 15:04:25 EDT)
  • using TCP53 for DNS (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 12:39:09 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 00:21:02 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 00:13:14 EDT)
  • Re: Root DNS Servers 2 (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 11:55:32 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 15:47:46 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 14:20:23 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 14:36:45 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 13:50:35 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 11:50:11 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 01:25:32 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 23:16:13 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 17:40:29 EDT)
• Paul G
  • OT: calling Apple (apple.com) (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 01:30:13 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 13:48:49 EDT)
• Paul Jasa
  • RE: books every network operator should read? (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 00:43:36 EDT)
• Paul Ryan
  • FW: Port 25 - Blacklash (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 11:10:41 EDT)
• Paul Vixie
  • Re: RFC1918 in-addr.arpa local copies (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 00:18:49 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 11:53:36 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 17:38:35 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 15:55:14 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 12:03:21 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 13:09:36 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 23:49:17 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 23:40:52 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 21:11:35 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 19:50:51 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 13:58:28 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 13:41:35 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 12:34:50 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 12:29:14 EDT)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:54:40 EST)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 10:08:42 EST)
• Paul Wouters
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 18:03:21 EDT)
• Peering
  • OC3 to Gig-E conversion (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 17:20:21 EDT)
• Pendergrass, Greg
  • RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 06:05:02 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 06:01:03 EDT)
• Per Gregers Bilse
  • Re: AUP for NANOG? (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 04:46:14 EDT)
• Pete Templin
  • Re: AS prepending (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 11:35:40 EDT)
• Peter & Karin Dambier
  • Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 12:47:25 EDT)
  • Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 06:00:15 EDT)
  • Re: FCC Chief Wants 911 Service for Internet Phones (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 04:13:09 EDT)
  • Re: Root DNS servers (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 12:01:11 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 16:08:01 EDT)
  • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 04:46:11 EDT)
• Peter Corlett
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 09:51:20 EDT)
  • Re: botted hosts (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 17:48:37 EDT)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Sat Apr 02 2005 - 10:44:09 EST)
• Peter John Hill
  • Re: New worm? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 13:27:56 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 15:04:38 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 15:03:03 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 14:00:47 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 13:32:10 EDT)
• Petri Helenius
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 14:46:44 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:46:07 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:36:23 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 14:55:14 EDT)
  • Re: Detecting VoIP traffic in ISP network (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 14:17:15 EDT)
  • gigabit residential (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 10:46:03 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 12:07:19 EDT)
  • Re: clued/interested LEO list (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 15:49:58 EDT)
  • Re: clued/interested LEO list (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 15:24:20 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 14:10:37 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 13:56:01 EDT)
  • Re: botted hosts (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 14:44:45 EDT)
  • Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts] (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 14:24:16 EDT)
• Philip Lavine
  • Re: AS prepending (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 12:05:59 EDT)
  • Re: AS prepending (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 11:04:41 EDT)
  • AS prepending (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 10:28:09 EDT)
• Philip Matthews
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 09:09:48 EDT)
  • Service providers that NAT their whole network? (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 15:39:56 EDT)
• Philip Smith
  • Re: Weekly Routing Table Report (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 01:52:10 EDT)
• Rachael Treu Gomes
  • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 15:14:44 EDT)
• Randy Bush
  • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 18:27:51 EDT)
  • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 15:57:56 EDT)
  • Re: PAIX Outages (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 14:43:10 EDT)
  • Re: Internet2 (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 14:23:43 EDT)
  • Re: Internet2 (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:13:35 EDT)
  • Re: Internet2 (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:17:22 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 09:35:13 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 01:13:47 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 20:24:12 EDT)
  • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 00:28:29 EDT)
  • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 22:48:45 EDT)
  • Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 20:23:19 EDT)
  • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 12:25:45 EDT)
  • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 12:01:55 EDT)
  • Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent) (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 04:23:53 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:03:09 EDT)
  • RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:23:38 EDT)
  • Re: AUP for NANOG? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 11:45:22 EDT)
  • Re: AUP for NANOG? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 11:15:29 EDT)
  • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 21:56:11 EDT)
  • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 18:34:58 EDT)
  • Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 13:05:04 EDT)
  • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:38:02 EDT)
  • Re: Blog... (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:34:09 EDT)
  • Re: SORBS Identity theft alert (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 05:19:52 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 22:43:18 EDT)
  • Re: Blog... (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 16:33:49 EDT)
  • Re: DNS cache poisoning update (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 16:49:06 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 14:13:42 EDT)
  • Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco) (Sat Apr 02 2005 - 10:13:04 EST)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 17:00:56 EST)
  • Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:08:17 EST)
  • Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:55:43 EST)
  • Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:31:06 EST)
• Reeves, Rob
  • RE: Getting a BGP table in to a lab (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 18:05:58 EDT)
  • RE: Getting a BGP table in to a lab (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 11:17:52 EDT)
  • RE: Service providers that NAT their whole network? (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 17:15:01 EDT)
• Richard A Steenbergen
  • Re: OC3 to Gig-E conversion (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 22:03:50 EDT)
  • Re: OC3 to Gig-E conversion (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 19:05:04 EDT)
  • Re: PAIX Outages (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 18:57:53 EDT)
  • Re: PAIX Outages (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 13:51:54 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:16:44 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 15:51:57 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 14:16:32 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 12:27:39 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 10:02:58 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 18:24:19 EDT)
• Richard Cox
  • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 20:30:37 EDT)
  • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 18:22:30 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:18:38 EST)
• Richard Irving
  • Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 10:03:41 EDT)
• Rob Thomas
  • IANA IPv4 allocations and bogon update: 41/8 (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 10:26:01 EDT)
• Robert Beverly
  • Re: Internet email performance study (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 16:42:22 EDT)
  • Internet email performance study (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 15:21:01 EDT)
• Robert Bonomi
  • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 20:23:50 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:50:29 EST)
  • Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:51:13 EST)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 08:18:54 EST)
• Robert Boyle
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 01:30:58 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:13:28 EST)
  • Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 11:55:56 EST)
• Robert E.Seastrom
  • Re: books every network operator should read? (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 08:04:13 EDT)
• Robert M. Enger
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 19:20:35 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 16:40:50 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 16:00:40 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? PPLB is not a good thing (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 15:29:18 EDT)
  • Re: Positioning technology (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:40:09 EST)
• Rodney Joffe
  • ICANN needs you! (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 03:01:36 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 00:34:54 EDT)
• Roger Marquis
  • Re: books every network operator should read? (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 19:48:07 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 19:32:12 EDT)
• Romain Komorn
  • Re: AUP for NANOG? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 12:14:30 EDT)
• Ross Hosman
  • Comcast Contact (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 11:04:57 EDT)
• Routing Table Analysis
  • Weekly Routing Table Report (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 14:07:16 EDT)
  • Weekly Routing Table Report (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 14:09:54 EDT)
  • Weekly Routing Table Report (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 14:07:16 EDT)
  • Weekly Routing Table Report (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 14:18:54 EDT)
  • Weekly Routing Table Report (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:10:30 EST)
• Roy
  • DNS Round Robin (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 17:55:22 EDT)
  • Re: Positioning technology (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:57:54 EST)
  • Positioning technology (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 09:45:44 EST)
• Sam Hayes Merritt, III
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 12:38:33 EDT)
  • Re: botted hosts (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 16:56:10 EDT)
• Scott Call
  • Re: Internet2 (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:05:34 EDT)
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 16:40:12 EDT)
• Scott Grayban
  • Re: Security Concerns Boosted VeriSign's Dot-Net Bid (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 10:55:52 EDT)
  • grrr (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 02:17:05 EDT)
  • Re: AUP for NANOG? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 12:22:26 EDT)
  • Re: Comcast Contact (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 13:46:14 EDT)
  • Re: Hotmail-- Again?? (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 12:18:13 EDT)
• Scott Morris
  • RE: Getting a BGP table in to a lab (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 20:49:32 EDT)
  • RE: Getting a BGP table in to a lab (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 20:41:30 EDT)
• Scott W Brim
  • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 07:06:48 EDT)
• Scott Weeks
  • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:41:07 EDT)
  • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 15:45:56 EDT)
  • Comment for new folks and posting [was: AUP for NANOG?] (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:09:50 EDT)
  • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 18:02:39 EDT)
  • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 17:26:53 EDT)
• Sean Donelan
  • Federal Security Bureau asks for more authority to control Internet (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 16:15:32 EDT)
  • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 23:49:02 EDT)
  • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 20:40:00 EDT)
  • Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 22:03:39 EDT)
  • Six PCs caused BigPond problems (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 01:38:28 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 13:07:48 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 21:15:39 EDT)
  • Port 0 traffic (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 15:09:11 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 21:46:19 EDT)
  • The power of default configurations (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 18:00:05 EDT)
  • Arrest for cable sabotage (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 06:03:54 EDT)
• Simon Waters
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 04:14:28 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 04:10:00 EDT)
  • Re: The power of default configurations (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 09:07:21 EDT)
  • Re: botted hosts (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 05:37:44 EDT)
  • Re: botted hosts (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 05:35:01 EDT)
  • Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 05:22:34 EDT)
• sjk
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 16:15:36 EDT)
• Stefan Schmidt
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 23:34:23 EDT)
• Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 04:47:56 EDT)
  • Re: using TCP53 for DNS (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:26:44 EDT)
  • Re: using TCP53 for DNS (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:24:34 EDT)
  • Re: using TCP53 for DNS (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:21:31 EDT)
  • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 08:00:08 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 03:41:51 EDT)
• Stephen Baxter
  • Reports or data on data centres without access to competitive fibre (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 20:43:12 EDT)
• Stephen J. Wilcox
  • Re: PAIX Outages (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 16:29:22 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 05:41:53 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 05:04:03 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 05:22:03 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 20:31:04 EDT)
  • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 08:07:44 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 12:06:50 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:46:37 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:07:25 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 16:54:50 EDT)
  • Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts] (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 15:09:34 EDT)
• Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 18:32:22 EST)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors ) (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 18:32:29 EST)
  • Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:03:23 EST)
• Steve Atkins
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 02:22:53 EDT)
• Steve Feldman
  • Re: Topics for NANOG 34 (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 22:48:56 EDT)
  • Topics for NANOG 34 (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 03:14:43 EDT)
  • Reminder: NANOG 34 proposals due Monday, April 4 (Sun Apr 03 2005 - 22:34:35 EDT)
• Steve Gibbard
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 18:09:08 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Sat Apr 23 2005 - 01:51:31 EDT)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 15:26:33 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Sat Apr 16 2005 - 21:51:01 EDT)
  • Re: AUP for NANOG? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 15:20:14 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 13:38:28 EDT)
  • RE: BGP Anywhere - Global Redundancy (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 21:41:50 EDT)
  • Re: BGP Anywhere - Global Redundancy (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 20:47:50 EDT)
• Steve Meuse
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 16:27:10 EDT)
  • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 18:51:56 EDT)
  • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8) (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 16:38:44 EDT)
• Steve Sobol
  • (no subject) (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 14:15:26 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 10:20:37 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 21:48:19 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 15:02:09 EDT)
  • Re: The "not long discussion" thread.... (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 20:59:55 EDT)
  • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 19:14:01 EDT)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 19:11:15 EDT)
  • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 14:47:50 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 18:27:44 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 16:20:35 EDT)
  • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 16:13:36 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:03:24 EST)
• Steven Champeon
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 00:00:27 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 16:53:45 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 15:27:36 EDT)
  • Re: clarity (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 14:15:30 EDT)
  • where 419 scams come from (was: Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)) (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 18:28:25 EDT)
• Steven J. Sobol
  • RE: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 17:39:56 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 17:23:08 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 02:16:36 EDT)
• Steven M. Bellovin
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:00:02 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 13:39:26 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 11:05:45 EDT)
  • Re: Getting a BGP table in to a lab (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 12:05:48 EDT)
  • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 16:13:06 EDT)
  • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problems (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 14:18:57 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 17:20:59 EDT)
  • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 15:01:38 EDT)
• Suresh Ramasubramanian
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 23:32:04 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 22:10:13 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 22:11:34 EDT)
  • Re: Federal Security Bureau asks for more authority to control Internet (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 07:18:14 EDT)
  • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 22:20:50 EDT)
  • Re: Port 25 - Blacklash (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 13:44:25 EDT)
  • Another panix.com scenario? Hushmail this time (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 11:28:06 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 06:13:51 EDT)
  • Re: Detecting VoIP traffic in ISP network (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 05:02:53 EDT)
  • Re: Port 25 - Blacklash (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 05:01:42 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 23:24:18 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 00:45:40 EDT)
  • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 21:36:34 EDT)
  • Re: versions, filtering, and access OH MY!! (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 03:47:37 EDT)
  • Promosis? Who are these guys? (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 03:08:18 EDT)
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 22:57:46 EDT)
  • Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competition (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 22:26:36 EDT)
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 22:24:05 EDT)
  • Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etc (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 22:11:52 EDT)
  • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NAS (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 07:47:58 EDT)
  • Re: Comcast Contact (Wed Apr 13 2005 - 23:12:50 EDT)
  • Re: Hotmail-- Again?? (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 22:31:58 EDT)
  • Re: Hotmail-- Again?? (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 21:48:41 EDT)
  • Re: article: port 25 blocking (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 05:31:21 EDT)
  • Call for Track Chairs - APRICOT 2006 (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 01:31:53 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 22:29:54 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 22:03:33 EDT)
  • Re: Spam (un)blocking (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 09:31:42 EDT)
  • Re: botted hosts (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 08:32:59 EDT)
  • Re: botted hosts (Tue Apr 05 2005 - 08:24:06 EDT)
  • Re: botted hosts (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 08:18:15 EDT)
  • Re: botted hosts (Mon Apr 04 2005 - 08:13:33 EDT)
• Susan Harris
  • This fall in LA (Wed Apr 20 2005 - 15:07:02 EDT)
  • Re: AUP for NANOG? (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 11:43:09 EDT)
  • Re: Blog... (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 16:14:02 EDT)
• Thomas Kernen
  • Re: cost of doing business (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 09:46:58 EDT)
  • Re: cost of doing business (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 01:59:00 EDT)
  • Re: cost of doing business (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 14:48:06 EDT)
• Tobias Reckhard
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Tue Apr 12 2005 - 01:51:12 EDT)
• Todd Vierling
  • Re: DNS Round Robin (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 20:08:18 EDT)
• Tom Sands
  • Re: Level3 Blip? (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 16:34:37 EDT)
  • Cingular (Thu Apr 07 2005 - 15:22:20 EDT)
• Tom Vest
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 23:17:40 EDT)
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 22:36:01 EDT)
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 21:13:28 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Fri Apr 15 2005 - 14:23:09 EDT)
• Tony Rall
  • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstations (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 17:10:03 EDT)
• Vandy Hamidi
  • RE: BGP Anywhere - Global Redundancy (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 18:58:24 EDT)
  • RE: BGP Anywhere - Global Redundancy (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 21:22:24 EDT)
  • BGP Anywhere - Global Redundancy (Wed Apr 06 2005 - 20:35:35 EDT)
• Vicky Rode
  • Re: Internet2 (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 20:46:41 EDT)
  • Re: Internet2 (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 19:55:20 EDT)
  • Re: Internet2 (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 19:49:45 EDT)
  • Re: Internet2 (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 17:07:15 EDT)
  • Internet2 (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 15:58:53 EDT)
  • Re: DSCP ECN bits (Mon Apr 18 2005 - 17:54:34 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 20:39:38 EDT)
  • djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 18:55:15 EDT)
• W. Mark Herrick, Jr.
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 16:11:02 EDT)
• W.D.McKinney
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Fri Apr 08 2005 - 21:18:06 EDT)
• Wayne E. Bouchard
  • Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:37:18 EST)
  • Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:34:12 EST)
• Will Yardley
  • Re: Load balance over multiple bgp feeds (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 20:15:29 EDT)
  • Re: Load balance over multiple bgp feeds (Thu Apr 21 2005 - 20:06:27 EDT)
  • Re: grrr (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 19:54:26 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Sat Apr 09 2005 - 12:35:30 EDT)
• william(at)elan.net
  • Re: Federal Security Bureau asks for more authority to control Internet (Fri Apr 29 2005 - 07:45:34 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Thu Apr 28 2005 - 18:17:12 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 15:01:58 EDT)
  • Re: clarity (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 06:50:28 EDT)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden (Wed Apr 27 2005 - 03:42:41 EDT)
  • Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competition (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 05:02:08 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.com (Tue Apr 26 2005 - 01:19:51 EDT)
  • Re: Dual rackmountable power supply? (Fri Apr 22 2005 - 18:52:54 EDT)
  • Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competition (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 14:51:10 EDT)
  • Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competition (Tue Apr 19 2005 - 14:22:24 EDT)
  • Re: Topics for NANOG 34 (Sun Apr 17 2005 - 13:20:24 EDT)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent (Thu Apr 14 2005 - 09:39:27 EDT)
  • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad. (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 21:20:03 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 15:07:27 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 14:20:07 EDT)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND (Mon Apr 11 2005 - 09:58:07 EDT)
  • Re: clued/interested LEO list (Sun Apr 10 2005 - 17:12:56 EDT)
  • Re: RFC 4041 (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 09:44:08 EST)
• Wyatt Smiarli, Esq.
  • qwest packet drops? (Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:33:26 EST)

Last message date: Sat Apr 30 2005 - 23:34:51 EDT
Archived on: Sat Apr 30 2005 - 23:34:59 EDT

1158 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]