Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden

From: Owen DeLong (no email)
Date: Wed Apr 27 2005 - 01:38:00 EDT

  • Next message: Fergie (Paul Ferguson): "Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden"

    I think it's absurd. I expect my water delivery company not to add
    polutants in transit. I expect my water production company to provide
    clean water.

    This is like asking the phone company to prevent minors from hearing
    swear-words on telephone calls or prevent people from being able to make
    prank phone calls from pay-phones.

    When Mr. Schneier gets that level of service from his phone company, then,
    perhaps he can expect the same from his ISP.

    The worst part of that article is that it only quotes people with a vested
    interest in sellling service-provider based solutions to end-host based
    problems.

    So much for any sort of journalistic ethic, fact checking, or, unbiased
    reporting.

    Owen

    --On Wednesday, April 27, 2005 3:09 +0000 "Fergie (Paul Ferguson)"
    <> wrote:

    >
    >
    > I've been there -- I know how I feel about it -- but I'd love
    > to know how ISP operations folk feel about this.
    >
    > Links here:
    > http://www.vnunet.com/news/1162720
    >
    > ...and, of course, here:
    > http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/2005/04/schneier-isps-should-bear-security.h
    > tml
    >
    > Off list, if you'd like. Or not.
    >
    > - ferg
    >
    > --
    > "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
    > Engineering Architecture for the Internet
    > or
    > ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/

    -- 
    If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably
    a forgery.
    
    



  • Next message: Fergie (Paul Ferguson): "Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD