Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance

From: Owen DeLong (no email)
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 19:08:08 EST

  • Next message: Owen DeLong: "Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )"

    > That may be the rule in Florida, but in DC, MD, and UT
    > (the states in which I've lived in the past 2
    > decades), you can be be ticketed if you are driving a
    > car and not wearing a seatbelt.
    >
    This is true in CA, too. However, the law in CA specifically provides
    that if you are driving a car first registered before XXX (I don't remember
    the exact year in which seatbelts became mandatory), you are exempt
    as the car is not required to have seat belts. There are many other lesser
    known exceptions to the seatbelt law. These are likely true in those other
    states as well, but, I confess I haven't done detailed legal research
    outside
    of my own state.

    > To make this a little bit more relevant to our
    > VoIP/911 discussion, would we allow a startup car
    > company to sell something which looked like a
    > seatbelt, but was not crash rated above 5 mph? No, of
    > course we wouldn't. Would that be anticompetitive?
    > No, it just means that to be a startup car company,
    > you have to meet the same safety standards as the
    > existing car companies.
    >
    Yes... It is indeed unfortunate that the VOIP providers are choosing to look
    like telcos, and, more unfortunate that they are providing a service that
    looks like telephony instead of some of the real possibilities of VOIP.

    > Why would these arguments not apply to VoIP?
    >
    VOIP without 911 is not creating toxic emissions that are harmful to the
    people around them. VOIP without 911 is simply another form of
    communication.
    I haven't heard anyone demanding 911 service for IRC or Email. Why should
    it apply to VOIP? Just because it's a voice service? 911 service is not
    a standard feature of many voice appliances availble today. Various two-way
    radios, for example. VOIP is VOIP. It is _NOT_ the PSTN. It may be that
    the PSTN loses many of it's customers to VOIP. It may be that the best
    services available are those that integrate the capabilities of VOIP and
    the PSTN, but, in the end, it still remains that they are different services
    and should be subject to different requirements and regulations.

    Owen

    -- 
    If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
    
    



  • Next message: Owen DeLong: "Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD