Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure

From: Randy Bush (no email)
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:31:06 EST

  • Next message: bob: "Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco"

    > For what it's worth, a highly scientific measurement from my house in
    > Berkeley, the authoritative location for all quantitative evaluation of
    > the Internet, using secret proprietary round-trip latency-measurement
    > tools...
    >
    > a.nic.de, 100 packets, 7% packet loss
    > round-trip min/avg/max = 163.454/199.368/494.708 ms
    >
    > c.de.net, 100 packets, 2% packet loss
    > round-trip min/avg/max = 15.071/46.131/724.957 ms
    >
    > z.nic.de, 100 packets, 3% packet loss
    > round-trip min/avg/max = 180.9/222.723/578.468 ms
    >
    > s.de.net, 100 packets, 0% packet loss
    > round-trip min/avg/max = 184.26/219.786/501.547 ms
    >
    > l.de.net, 100 packets, 1% packet loss
    > round-trip min/avg/max = 170.435/211.573/568.7 ms
    >
    > f.nic.de, 100 packets, 5% packet loss
    > round-trip min/avg/max = 171.717/206.826/489.947 ms
    >
    > Overall for DENIC: 3% loss and 15ms / 166ms / 725ms min/avg/max latency.
    > c.de.net is the one I'd be using, and it gives 2% loss and 46ms latency.

    c.de.net is the one you WISH your resolver would use. sometimes
    it might, others it might not.

    randy


  • Next message: bob: "Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD