From: Florian Weimer (no email)
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 06:02:19 EST
* Bill Woodcock:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Yes, the selection of criteria could be biased. Or Telcordia compared
> > apples and oranges when it compared Verisign's 100 ms to DENIC's
> > 200 ms (or what the actual numbers where).
>
> Yeah, I was a little curious about the composition of the latency
> number as well... [...] But I'd certainly be curious as to their
> actual methodology.
It's described in the report. Basically, their comparison is based on
the submitted proposals. Telcordia did conduct site visits, but did
not perform any network measurements. The latter would have been
impossible anyway because some of the proposed infrastructure does not
exist yet.
|
|
|