North American Network Operators 0503
By messages with attachments

Most recent messages
906 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

Starting: Tue Mar 01 2005 - 04:13:52 EST
Ending: Thu Mar 31 2005 - 22:43:21 EST

• Re: Internet Email Services Association ( wasRE: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?) (no name) (Tue Mar 01 2005 - 05:44:26 EST)
  1. part (227 bytes)
• Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? (no name) (Tue Mar 01 2005 - 09:43:19 EST)
  1. part (227 bytes)
• Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? (no name) (Tue Mar 01 2005 - 10:23:44 EST)
  1. part (227 bytes)
• Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Chris Horry (Tue Mar 01 2005 - 15:23:33 EST)
  1. part (1914 bytes)
• RE: More on Vonage service disruptions... Jeff Rosowski (Wed Mar 02 2005 - 13:29:34 EST)
  1. part (563 bytes)
• Re: Heads up: Long AS-sets announced in the next few days Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Wed Mar 02 2005 - 14:00:51 EST)
  1. part (603 bytes)
• Re: AOL scomp Gary E. Miller (Wed Mar 02 2005 - 14:21:49 EST)
  1. part (983 bytes)
• Re: Is anyone actually using OER to do traffic shaping/balancing? Chris A. Epler (Wed Mar 02 2005 - 18:15:43 EST)
  1. part (525 bytes)
• Re: Heads up: Long AS-sets announced in the next few days Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Thu Mar 03 2005 - 04:53:12 EST)
  1. part (1134 bytes)
• scanner<->dns Vicky Rode (Thu Mar 03 2005 - 10:45:13 EST)
  1. part (670 bytes)
• public accessible snmp devices? Vicky Rode (Thu Mar 03 2005 - 10:53:03 EST)
  1. part (630 bytes)
• Re: Heads up: Long AS-sets announced in the next few days Jeroen Massar (Thu Mar 03 2005 - 12:02:09 EST)
  1. signature.asc (241 bytes)
• Re: Heads up: Long AS-sets announced in the next few days Jeroen Massar (Thu Mar 03 2005 - 14:19:24 EST)
  1. signature.asc (241 bytes)
• Re: Utah considers law to mandate ISP's block "harmful" sites Gary E. Miller (Fri Mar 04 2005 - 14:35:02 EST)
  1. part (820 bytes)
• RE: Utah considers law to mandate ISP's block "harmful" sites Joe Johnson (Fri Mar 04 2005 - 14:52:15 EST)
  1. part (1916 bytes)
• Re: Traceroute with ASN Bruce Pinsky (Tue Mar 15 2005 - 05:22:50 EST)
  1. part (659 bytes)
• Re: sorbs.net (no name) (Tue Mar 15 2005 - 15:28:17 EST)
  1. part (227 bytes)
• Re: sorbs.net (no name) (Tue Mar 15 2005 - 16:19:01 EST)
  1. part (227 bytes)
• Re: Traceroute with ASN Bruce Pinsky (Tue Mar 15 2005 - 18:03:12 EST)
  1. part (983 bytes)
• Re: Delegating /24's from a /19 Owen DeLong (Tue Mar 15 2005 - 18:55:29 EST)
  1. part (187 bytes)
• Re: Delegating /24's from a /19 Owen DeLong (Tue Mar 15 2005 - 23:22:24 EST)
  1. part (187 bytes)
• Re: Delegating /24's from a /19 Owen DeLong (Thu Mar 17 2005 - 02:54:15 EST)
  1. part (187 bytes)
• Re: sorbs.net (no name) (Tue Mar 22 2005 - 11:07:16 EST)
  1. part (227 bytes)
• Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill (no name) (Tue Mar 22 2005 - 11:31:34 EST)
  1. part (227 bytes)
• Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill (no name) (Tue Mar 22 2005 - 14:25:22 EST)
  1. part (227 bytes)
• Re: IBM to offer service to bounce unwanted e-mail back to the computers that sent them Vicky Rode (Tue Mar 22 2005 - 14:52:24 EST)
  1. part (1077 bytes)
• Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Owen DeLong (Tue Mar 22 2005 - 19:16:05 EST)
  1. part (187 bytes)
• Re: ARIN, was Re: 72/8 friendly reminder Owen DeLong (Thu Mar 24 2005 - 15:40:01 EST)
  1. part (187 bytes)
• Re: ARIN, was Re: 72/8 friendly reminder Owen DeLong (Thu Mar 24 2005 - 15:53:53 EST)
  1. part (187 bytes)
• Re: ARIN, was Re: 72/8 friendly reminder Owen DeLong (Thu Mar 24 2005 - 16:01:06 EST)
  1. part (187 bytes)
• Re: "Bandwidth Advisors" - www.bandwidthadvisors.com Tim Pozar (Thu Mar 24 2005 - 19:29:23 EST)
  1. pozar.vcf (197 bytes)
• Re: ARIN, was Re: 72/8 friendly reminder Owen DeLong (Thu Mar 24 2005 - 23:52:58 EST)
  1. part (187 bytes)
• Re: ARIN, was Re: 72/8 friendly reminder Owen DeLong (Thu Mar 24 2005 - 23:59:49 EST)
  1. part (187 bytes)
• Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors Chip Mefford (Mon Mar 28 2005 - 06:27:56 EST)
  1. part (2374 bytes)
• Re: outage/maintenance window opinion Vicky Rode (Mon Mar 28 2005 - 12:30:38 EST)
  1. part (995 bytes)
• Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] (no name) (Tue Mar 29 2005 - 12:23:17 EST)
  1. part (227 bytes)
• Re: ICANN on the panix.com theft Doug Barton (Tue Mar 29 2005 - 21:11:22 EST)
  1. part (1040 bytes)
• Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Leo Bicknell (Wed Mar 30 2005 - 10:30:51 EST)
  1. part (188 bytes)
• IANA IPv4 allocations and bogon update: 73/8 Rob Thomas (Wed Mar 30 2005 - 19:58:01 EST)
  1. part (3757 bytes)
• Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Owen DeLong (Thu Mar 31 2005 - 00:59:14 EST)
  1. part (187 bytes)
• Re: Contact from ACM? Vicky Rode (Thu Mar 31 2005 - 01:24:57 EST)
  1. part (1116 bytes)
• Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Owen DeLong (Thu Mar 31 2005 - 03:12:23 EST)
  1. part (187 bytes)
• Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Owen DeLong (Thu Mar 31 2005 - 17:26:56 EST)
  1. part (187 bytes)
• Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Owen DeLong (Thu Mar 31 2005 - 17:41:32 EST)
  1. part (187 bytes)
• Re: Topicality Question: VoIP Owen DeLong (Thu Mar 31 2005 - 18:36:46 EST)
  1. part (187 bytes)

Last message date: Thu Mar 31 2005 - 22:43:21 EST
Archived on: Thu Mar 31 2005 - 22:43:22 EST

906 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]