Re: Heads up: Long AS-sets announced in the next few days

• Previous message: Steve Feldman: "Reminder: 2005 NANOG Program Survey"
• Maybe in reply to: Lorenzo Colitti: "Heads up: Long AS-sets announced in the next few days"
• Next in thread: David Schwartz: "RE: Heads up: Long AS-sets announced in the next few days"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 13:51 -0500, Blaine Christian wrote:

>And, of course, the RPSEC working group draft that is supposed to target the
>BGP requirements for those proposed systems is...
>
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rpsec-bgpsecrec-01.txt
>
>The folks who worked on S-BGP and SO-BGP participated in it's creation (as
>well as several operators). Please note that there are more than just two
>proposed mechanisms for securing BGP. The two mentioned above are just the
>most popular <grin>.

Thanks for the new reading material, I had not seen that one yet...
*print* will be a nice read

(hmmm, actually I should swear at you for even more reading material,
for which I have no time, oh well :)

Greets,
 Jeroen

• application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part

• Previous message: Steve Feldman: "Reminder: 2005 NANOG Program Survey"
• Maybe in reply to: Lorenzo Colitti: "Heads up: Long AS-sets announced in the next few days"
• Next in thread: David Schwartz: "RE: Heads up: Long AS-sets announced in the next few days"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]