From: Suresh Ramasubramanian (no email)
Date: Wed Mar 02 2005 - 17:11:46 EST
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:15:51 -0500 (EST), Todd Vierling <> wrote:
>
> Your third option is best. (Excuse the signature-pun. :)
>
> SRS does not require SPF, and provides auditability for forwarded mail:
>
> http://spf.pobox.com/srs.html
>
In which case dont futz about with SES (thats yet another name for SRS
i think, I prefer to think I'm the only SRS around) - use BATV
instead. Its specced for exactly what #3 says.
srs
-- Suresh Ramasubramanian ()
|
|
|