From: Christopher L. Morrow (no email)
Date: Wed Mar 02 2005 - 03:13:18 EST
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>
> >
> > At 02:49 AM 02-03-05 +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> > >On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:27:31AM +0000, James A. T. Rice wrote:
> > > > What exactly are you attempting to do here? Those announcements will get
> > > > dropped on the floor at least in this AS right away:
> > > >
> > > > route-map peers-in deny 5
> > > > match as-path 109
> > >
> > >AS-Sets, not AS-Paths...
> >
> > An example of which I received recently:
> > Feb 27 19:54:16: %BGP-6-ASPATH: Long AS path 20965 1299 3320 15589 15589
> > 5397
> > {33,109,145,293,559,816,1103,1273,1275,1752,1853,1930,2042,2200,2497,2500,2914,3257,3265,3333,3352,3425,3549,4691,4697,4716,4725,5511,5539,5609,5623,6175,6435,6453,6762,6830,6939,7580,7660,8447,8472,8763,9264,10566,12779,12793,12859,13944,14277,15897,17715,17965,24136,24895,25358,29377,29686,31103,32266}
> > received from 2001:798:201B:10AA::1: More than configured MAXAS-LIMIT
>
> different, but related to:
> Feb 1 20:47:01.608: %BGP-6-ASPATH: Long AS path 3356 6770
> received from x.y.a.b: More than configured MAXAS-LIMIT
>
> hey, 8282/Fido, perhaps you don't really need a 100 as as-path? :)
uhm, back in my hole... this is a month ago :)
|
|
|