- Previous message: Barry Shein: "Re: AOL scomp"
- Maybe in reply to: Jim Segrave: "Re: AOL scomp"
- Next in thread: David Lesher: "Re: AOL scomp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
|
|
|
From: Joe Maimon (no email)
Date: Tue Mar 01 2005 - 22:36:26 EST
Barry Shein wrote:
>
> On March 1, 2005 at 14:17 (Jim Segrave) wrote:
> > I don't understand this complaint - we process AOL TOS Notifications
> > daily and I find perhaps 1 in a hundred or so are not valid complaints.
>
> Here about 99% are not valid or interesting.
>
> Which is to say, I had one small burst once caused by an infected
> customer machine which we got shut off fast and fixed.
>
> The rest are virtually all just people on mailing lists hosted here
> sending each and every completely on-topic posting to TOS.
>
> I suppose I should figure out some way to track them so I can boot
> them off those lists since AOL removes all identifying information.
>
Apparently the ratio of valid/invalid AOL notifications is a usefull
indicator on the cleanliness of the relevant network.
Some might suggest that large amounts of untrackable inaccurate
complaints are themselves abuse.
|
|
|