Re: Heads up: Long AS-sets announced in the next few days

From: Daniel Roesen (no email)
Date: Tue Mar 01 2005 - 20:49:56 EST

Next message: Steve Gibbard: "Is there anything more to say on this subject? (was RE: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?)"

Previous message: k claffy: "not operationally relevant until it's used in the wild"
Maybe in reply to: Lorenzo Colitti: "Heads up: Long AS-sets announced in the next few days"
Next in thread: Hank Nussbacher: "Re: Heads up: Long AS-sets announced in the next few days"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:27:31AM +0000, James A. T. Rice wrote:
> What exactly are you attempting to do here? Those announcements will get
> dropped on the floor at least in this AS right away:
>
> route-map peers-in deny 5
> match as-path 109

AS-Sets, not AS-Paths...

Regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber:  -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0

Next message: Steve Gibbard: "Is there anything more to say on this subject? (was RE: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?)"

Previous message: k claffy: "not operationally relevant until it's used in the wild"
Maybe in reply to: Lorenzo Colitti: "Heads up: Long AS-sets announced in the next few days"
Next in thread: Hank Nussbacher: "Re: Heads up: Long AS-sets announced in the next few days"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs