Re: Internet Email Services Association ( wasRE: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?)

From: Todd Vierling (no email)
Date: Tue Mar 01 2005 - 13:14:07 EST

  • Next message: Lorenzo Colitti: "Heads up: Long AS-sets announced in the next few days"

    On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 wrote:

    > > I'm skeptical that a model that only sort of works for under 30K ASNs
    > > and maybe 1K bilateral peering agreements for the *really* big Tier-1s
    > > won't scale to a world that has 40M+ .com domains and probably a million
    > > SMTP servers.
    >
    > Well the way that I see this scaling is that you have a core of email
    > service providers who are members of the Internet Mail Services
    > Association.

    The business world simply doesn't work that way. Ever heard of the phrase
    "Standards are great -- there's so many of them to choose from!"?

    > These core operators sign up to a multilateral mail peering agreement and
    > provide email transit services for other operators.
    >
    > The next layer is the non-core email service providers who have bilateral
    > mail peering agreements with one or more core email transport providers.

    Contrary to what you said before, this *IS* the UUCP model in a nutshell.
    It has been done before, it does not scale, and it does not fit the way
    business works today.

    -- 
    -- Todd Vierling <> <>
    

  • Next message: Lorenzo Colitti: "Heads up: Long AS-sets announced in the next few days"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD