Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178

From: Iljitsch van Beijnum (no email)
Date: Thu Sep 02 2004 - 18:15:42 EDT


On 2-sep-04, at 23:58, Randy Bush wrote:

>> If you don't implement ripe-229, why not?

> because the golden address space stuff is stupid

Maybe so, but the logic seems rather irrefutable:

- as a rule, shorter prefixes are more important and/or more stable
than long ones
- so we dampen long prefixes more aggressively
- the root DNS servers tend to live in long prefixes
- so we exclude the root DNS prefixes

But then again, dampening really doesn't buy you much as it only
applies to routes that are flapping beyond the link to the next AS. So
if you have an instable link somewhere, you can't dampen that
instability away yourself.








Hosted Email Solutions

Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD