From: Bill Manning (no email)
Date: Thu Sep 02 2004 - 12:06:12 EDT
well....
RIPE is the RIR for Europe. RIPE-229 is, from my viewpoint, arbitrary
and capricious.
the root servers are -ONE- set of interesting servers. what about the
web sites that point
to these "important" documents? or the time servers, or my NOC &
monitoring machines?
The idea of an Internet Registry stepping into giving routing advice is
a leap of faith.
An RIR can tell you what was delegated - but presuming to give advice
on what is important
for everyone that uses IP protocols is over the top.
so no, i don't use this document as a guideline for "golden networks".
the advice on
dampening is important tho and it worthwhile.
On Sep 3, 2004, at 3:44, Rodney Joffe wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> This is actually NANOG applicable, despite referring to RIPE... ;-)
>
> How many of you who manage BGP speaking networks implement the RIPE
> "best practices" regarding dampening parameters for so-called
> "golden networks"?
>
> See: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/routeflap-damping.html
> and
> http://www.qorbit.net/documents/golden-networks (thanks, Steve!)
>
> If you do, what parameters do you use, or do you not dampen the
> "golden networks" at all?
>
> If you don't implement ripe-229, why not?
>
> If there is enough interest/response (i.e if anyone besides me feels
> this is a real operational issue currently and wants to deal with it),
> I'll work on compiling the responses and producing a report.
>
> Note: A *significant* number of networks appear to *not* follow
> ripe-229 guidelines at all.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rodney Joffe
> CenterGate Research Group, LLC
> http://www.centergate.com
> "Technology so advanced, even WE don't understand it"(R)
>
|
|
|