From: Petri Helenius (no email)
Date: Thu Sep 02 2004 - 02:19:31 EDT
Joe Johnson wrote:
>All this hit here in Illinois when the Super DCMA took effect, and it
>technically became illegal to use a router in your home (as the Illinois
>DCMA restricts the ability to hide the source or destination of any
>electronic communication, kinda like NAT). I certainly didn't pull NAT
>off my home or my office connections! I think no one has been called
>down (e.g., no one has challenged) on the law, but I could be arrested
>at any time for running a basic Netgear router on my broadband at home.
>
>
>
Making NAT illegal is a good idea, however it was done for all the wrong
reasons.
Pete
>
>
>
>
>
|
|
|