Nanog 0407
By Author

743 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
About this archive
Other mail archives

Starting: Thu Jul 01 2004 - 01:12:37 EDT
Ending: Sat Jul 31 2004 - 23:53:18 EDT

• (no email)
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul - jack terminology (Sat Jul 24 2004 - 12:12:35 EDT)
  • Re: OT: Re: Critters (Sun Jul 11 2004 - 23:06:38 EDT)
  • RE: Quick circuit question. (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 15:45:44 EDT)
  • Barrages of Packet Errors (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 02:25:33 EDT)
• (no name)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Jul 30 2004 - 08:00:00 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Thu Jul 29 2004 - 17:58:31 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 13:45:37 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 16:32:53 EDT)
  • Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 15:52:42 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 13:49:13 EDT)
  • Re: Google? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 13:11:34 EDT)
  • Re: that MIT paper again (Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net ) (longish) (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 19:09:39 EDT)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 08:00:00 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 17:45:25 EDT)
  • DLS Service Simulator (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 16:11:12 EDT)
  • Re: Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline (Mon Jul 19 2004 - 05:38:15 EDT)
  • Re: Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline (Sun Jul 18 2004 - 20:34:48 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 14:39:52 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 14:30:39 EDT)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 08:00:00 EDT)
  • RE: Regional differences in P2P (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 04:31:58 EDT)
  • RE: Regional differences in P2P (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 03:20:20 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Wed Jul 14 2004 - 17:09:13 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Tue Jul 13 2004 - 17:11:05 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 17:05:27 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 16:13:59 EDT)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 08:00:00 EDT)
  • WTF --- (Thu Jul 08 2004 - 22:56:44 EDT)
  • RE: [WAY OT]: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering po int speed publicly available?] (Thu Jul 08 2004 - 13:10:33 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Wed Jul 07 2004 - 02:43:12 EDT)
  • Re: China deploys Internet protocol version 9 network (Wed Jul 07 2004 - 05:11:53 EDT)
  • 802.17 RPR and L2 Ethernet interoperablity (Ethernet over RPR) (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 14:50:24 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 05:40:10 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 05:35:24 EDT)
  • Re: China deploys Internet protocol version 9 network (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 02:26:38 EDT)
  • Re: Sipura VoIP phone adapters and DoS against name servers (Mon Jul 05 2004 - 13:37:40 EDT)
  • Re: Sipura VoIP phone adapters and DoS against name servers (Mon Jul 05 2004 - 13:10:51 EDT)
  • Sipura VoIP phone adapters and DoS against name servers (Mon Jul 05 2004 - 12:57:03 EDT)
  • Re: Who broke .org? (Sun Jul 04 2004 - 14:55:39 EDT)
  • Re: Peering point speed publicly available? (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 22:13:35 EDT)
  • Re: [Fwd: [IP] Intriguing Progress of China's IPv9 Network Technology] (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 09:30:38 EDT)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 08:00:00 EDT)
  • Re: Appeals court deals setback to spammers (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 06:06:34 EDT)
• Aaron Thomas
  • RE: OT: Re: Critters (Sun Jul 11 2004 - 00:44:06 EDT)
  • RE: mid-mount server rails (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 16:32:02 EDT)
• Adam 'Starblazer' Romberg
  • Re: Inexpensive Telephone Conference Bridge System (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 02:10:29 EDT)
• Adam Debus
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 13:32:30 EDT)
• Adam Rothschild
  • Re: Peering point speed publicly available? (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 01:52:42 EDT)
• Adrian Chadd
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 02:26:16 EDT)
• Alex Rubenstein
  • Looking for historical BGP announcement information (Tue Jul 13 2004 - 15:39:41 EDT)
• Alexei Roudnev
  • Re: Quick question. (Thu Jul 29 2004 - 14:02:28 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Sun Jul 18 2004 - 02:23:16 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Sat Jul 17 2004 - 03:17:37 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (let's return to reality) (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 00:38:16 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (let's return to reality) (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 02:52:27 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 01:57:17 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 01:52:07 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Wed Jul 14 2004 - 03:46:15 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Tue Jul 13 2004 - 13:53:14 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Sat Jul 10 2004 - 18:08:00 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Sat Jul 10 2004 - 16:19:44 EDT)
  • SNMPSTAT monitoring system - restored on public internet (sourceforge) (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 04:49:47 EDT)
  • Re: ARIN Comment (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 02:08:07 EDT)
• Alistair Cockeram
  • Re: Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline (Sat Jul 17 2004 - 17:58:49 EDT)
• Andre Oppermann
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 05:35:17 EDT)
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 13:38:05 EDT)
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 11:30:15 EDT)
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 11:04:33 EDT)
  • T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 08:25:16 EDT)
• Andy Dills
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 22:12:15 EDT)
• Andy Naylor
  • ARIN DNS outage? (Mon Jul 05 2004 - 06:20:30 EDT)
• Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
  • Scholarships available to International Spam Law & Policies conference (Sat Jul 17 2004 - 22:09:19 EDT)
• Anthony Edwards
  • Re: Google? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 13:29:36 EDT)
• Ben Browning
  • Re: Off-Topic: N.Y. Buyout Firm Has Its Eye on MCI (Wed Jul 14 2004 - 12:50:05 EDT)
• Ben Buxton
  • Re: COnfiguration Suggestion - Etherchannel (Thu Jul 29 2004 - 08:07:12 EDT)
  • Re: CWDM or DWDM passive add/drop muxes (Thu Jul 29 2004 - 08:04:08 EDT)
• Ben Crosby
  • Re: video distribution (Wed Jul 14 2004 - 17:01:13 EDT)
• Bill Woodcock
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sun Jul 04 2004 - 22:15:03 EDT)
  • Re: Who broke .org? (Sun Jul 04 2004 - 21:46:45 EDT)
  • Re: Who broke .org? (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 09:45:44 EDT)
  • Re: ultradns reachability (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 09:41:42 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 09:32:45 EDT)
  • Re: Peering point speed publicly available? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 20:14:10 EDT)
• Blake Ellman
  • Who controls the assignment of IP address, and under what terms? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 05:24:45 EDT)
• Brad Gould
  • .mil routing issues (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 20:27:42 EDT)
• Brandon Pinsky
  • Re: Campus size Wireless LAN (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 16:03:18 EDT)
• Brett
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (let's return to reality) (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 13:57:12 EDT)
• Brian Battle
  • RE: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 20:27:45 EDT)
  • RE: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Tue Jul 13 2004 - 18:18:06 EDT)
  • RE: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Tue Jul 13 2004 - 01:27:53 EDT)
• Bruce Beckwith
  • RE: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Sun Jul 11 2004 - 08:23:41 EDT)
• Bruce Pinsky
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 13:48:44 EDT)
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 13:46:36 EDT)
  • Re: BGP Dampening question (Tue Jul 20 2004 - 13:38:08 EDT)
• Bubba Parker
  • BGP Setup (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 20:02:23 EDT)
• Burton, Chris
  • RE: Loss of Telnet Capability to 6509 (Wed Jul 28 2004 - 15:18:25 EDT)
  • RE: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 19:08:02 EDT)
• Charles Sprickman
  • OT: xDSL hardware (Tue Jul 13 2004 - 18:09:18 EDT)
  • Re: DNS with Akamai (Sat Jul 10 2004 - 14:18:58 EDT)
• Chip Gwyn
  • Trouble with Cox/Verio (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 15:33:58 EDT)
• Chris Adams
  • Re: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS? (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 13:26:06 EDT)
  • Re: ultradns reachability (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 21:11:45 EDT)
• Chris Brenton
  • Re: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS? (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 22:16:49 EDT)
  • Re: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS? (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 21:09:55 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 20:43:43 EDT)
• Christian Kuhtz
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 10:05:21 EDT)
  • Re: Companies that sell NEBS x86 servers (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 18:03:51 EDT)
• Christopher Chin
  • Re: working sltnet.lk contact (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 13:38:25 EDT)
• Christopher J. Wolff
  • video distribution (Wed Jul 14 2004 - 16:01:44 EDT)
  • RE: Proxy scanning for spam (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 02:07:35 EDT)
  • RE: Proxy scanning for spam (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 01:37:43 EDT)
  • Proxy scanning for spam (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 01:29:38 EDT)
  • mid-mount server rails (Mon Jul 05 2004 - 23:07:24 EDT)
• Christopher L. Morrow
  • Re: Google? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 11:35:59 EDT)
  • Re: Controls are ineffective without user cooperation (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 01:52:33 EDT)
  • Re: Controls are ineffective without user cooperation (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 01:28:28 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 16:50:56 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 16:37:18 EDT)
  • RE: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 00:19:42 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Thu Jul 08 2004 - 20:57:45 EDT)
  • Re: China deploys Internet protocol version 9 network (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 02:49:19 EDT)
  • RE: Proxy scanning for spam (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 02:01:40 EDT)
  • Re: Proxy scanning for spam (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 01:35:33 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points (Mon Jul 05 2004 - 19:54:18 EDT)
  • Re: ultradns reachability (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 00:18:07 EDT)
  • Re: Who broke .org? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 22:37:31 EDT)
  • Re: ultradns reachability (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 22:06:59 EDT)
  • Re: Who broke .org? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 22:04:05 EDT)
• Christopher Woodfield
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul - jack terminology (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 15:23:54 EDT)
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 14:50:32 EDT)
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 13:43:08 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 14:20:33 EDT)
• Christopher X. Candreva
  • Re: OT: xDSL hardware (Tue Jul 13 2004 - 21:55:54 EDT)
  • Re: ultradns reachability (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 21:10:39 EDT)
• chuck goolsbee
  • Cox.net contact? (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 14:59:40 EDT)
• Claydon, Tom
  • RE: Google? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 13:34:08 EDT)
• Cody Lerum
  • RE: Peering point speed publicly available? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 22:06:59 EDT)
  • RE: Peering point speed publicly available? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 22:01:48 EDT)
  • RE: ultradns reachability (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 21:11:44 EDT)
  • RE: Peering point speed publicly available? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 21:05:51 EDT)
  • RE: Peering point speed publicly available? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 20:25:32 EDT)
• Craig A. Huegen
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 14:06:17 EDT)
• Curtis Maurand
  • Re: PPPoE questions (Thu Jul 29 2004 - 18:25:58 EDT)
  • PPPoE questions (Thu Jul 29 2004 - 16:37:34 EDT)
  • Re: Campus size Wireless LAN (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 17:50:05 EDT)
  • Re: Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline (Mon Jul 19 2004 - 22:02:40 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (let's return to reality) (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 16:32:37 EDT)
• D Train
  • Re: BGP Dampening question (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 11:27:58 EDT)
  • BGP Dampening question (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 23:46:54 EDT)
• D. Scott Smith
  • Re: Campus size Wireless LAN (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 14:25:46 EDT)
• Damian Lennon
  • RE: Google? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 13:03:50 EDT)
• Dan Hollis
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 14:30:21 EDT)
• Dan Lockwood
  • Quick question about secondary addresses (Fri Jul 30 2004 - 13:21:06 EDT)
  • Donation of cisco netflow export from production router? (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 16:55:50 EDT)
• Daniel Corbe
  • South Florida IXes (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 14:24:23 EDT)
• Daniel Golding
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 13:34:57 EDT)
  • Re: Peering point speed publicly available? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 22:02:11 EDT)
  • Re: Peering point speed publicly available? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 21:57:55 EDT)
• Daniel Karrenberg
  • Re: that MIT paper again (Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net ) (longish) (Sat Jul 24 2004 - 04:19:47 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 02:47:43 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 15:12:02 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 15:05:33 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 08:05:01 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 03:11:46 EDT)
• Daniel Senie
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 10:43:39 EDT)
  • Re: Surge Protection (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 13:06:10 EDT)
• Dave Dennis
  • Re: Controls are ineffective without user cooperation (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 01:36:53 EDT)
  • Need 3M System Admin contact (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 11:29:16 EDT)
• David A.Ulevitch
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 16:31:18 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Sat Jul 10 2004 - 23:45:43 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Sat Jul 10 2004 - 17:04:21 EDT)
  • Re: Who broke .org? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 23:24:51 EDT)
• David Lesher
  • Re: Surge Protection (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 23:01:29 EDT)
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 10:10:13 EDT)
  • Re: Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline (Mon Jul 19 2004 - 23:54:46 EDT)
  • Re: Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 21:00:32 EDT)
  • Re: Off-Topic: N.Y. Buyout Firm Has Its Eye on MCI (Tue Jul 13 2004 - 22:37:33 EDT)
  • Critters (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 09:51:16 EDT)
• David Schwartz
  • RE: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 14:16:15 EDT)
  • RE: ARIN Comment (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 17:29:13 EDT)
• Deepak Jain
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 17:06:33 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 16:45:04 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 16:00:30 EDT)
  • OT: Re: Critters (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 13:02:14 EDT)
• Dickson, Brian
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 14:30:28 EDT)
• Dorian Kim
  • Re: OT: Re: Critters (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 15:47:28 EDT)
• Doug White
  • Re: Google? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 13:52:48 EDT)
• Douglas Otis
  • Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 23:18:11 EDT)
  • Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 18:09:59 EDT)
• Douglas S. Peeples
  • RE: Campus size Wireless LAN (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 06:58:12 EDT)
• Dr. Jeffrey Race
  • RE: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 00:00:09 EDT)
  • Re: ultradns reachability (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 11:05:45 EDT)
• Drew Weaver
  • Quick circuit question. (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 11:42:32 EDT)
• Duane Wessels
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Sat Jul 24 2004 - 00:11:58 EDT)
• Edward B. Dreger
  • Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 17:36:05 EDT)
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 03:58:30 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 02:44:59 EDT)
  • Re: BGP Setup (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 20:22:38 EDT)
  • Re: Quick circuit question. (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 19:01:40 EDT)
  • RE: Quick circuit question. (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 18:55:08 EDT)
  • Re: Quick circuit question. (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 14:01:54 EDT)
  • Re: Quick circuit question. (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 11:39:41 EDT)
  • Re: Quick circuit question. (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 11:28:13 EDT)
  • Re: Who broke .org? (Sun Jul 04 2004 - 12:14:30 EDT)
  • Re: Who broke .org? (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 11:52:09 EDT)
  • Re: Who broke .org? (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 11:36:16 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 02:44:16 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 02:32:14 EDT)
  • Re: ultradns reachability (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 01:22:20 EDT)
  • Re: Peering point speed publicly available? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 23:39:42 EDT)
• Ejay Hire
  • RE: Inexpensive Telephone Conference Bridge System (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 13:20:42 EDT)
• Eric A. Hall
  • Re: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS? (Wed Jul 28 2004 - 10:57:51 EDT)
• Eric Brown
  • RE: Google? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 12:14:20 EDT)
  • RE: Campus size Wireless LAN (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 19:19:47 EDT)
  • Campus size Wireless LAN (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 14:01:48 EDT)
• Eric Brunner-Williams
  • Update on .iq, Elashi convicted of export violations (US) (Sat Jul 10 2004 - 07:04:58 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN Panel Pans VeriSign Search Service (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 17:10:16 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 15:21:17 EDT)
  • Re: OT: Re: Critters (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 09:29:28 EDT)
  • Re: China deploys Internet protocol version 9 network (Wed Jul 07 2004 - 03:16:15 EDT)
  • Re: E-Mail Snooping Ruled Permissible (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 07:28:30 EDT)
• Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 12:26:50 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 22:44:35 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 18:00:33 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 17:56:23 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 16:27:45 EDT)
• Eric Frazier
  • Re: ultradns reachability (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 21:18:51 EDT)
• Eric Gauthier
  • Re: Convention networks and viruses (Thu Jul 29 2004 - 12:47:30 EDT)
  • Re: DNC service providers (Sat Jul 24 2004 - 10:39:22 EDT)
• Eric Kagan
  • Re: OT: xDSL hardware (Tue Jul 13 2004 - 22:12:07 EDT)
• Eric Kuhnke
  • Re: CWDM or DWDM passive add/drop muxes (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 18:59:42 EDT)
• Eric Pylko
  • Announcing a /19 from a /16 (Mon Jul 05 2004 - 16:02:14 EDT)
• Erik Amundson
  • Peering point speed publicly available? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 20:09:52 EDT)
  • MCU/UUNet routing issues / packet loss this morning? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 06:20:54 EDT)
• Erik Parker
  • Re: Google? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 13:01:19 EDT)
• Etaoin Shrdlu
  • Re: DNS with Akamai (Sat Jul 10 2004 - 00:42:45 EDT)
• Evaldo Gardenali
  • Transfer Capping by ISPs (Was: Regional differences in P2P) (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 10:01:38 EDT)
  • Re: E-Mail Snooping Ruled Permissible (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 16:56:51 EDT)
• Fergie (Paul Ferguson)
  • Fwd: Enterprises indicate plans for MPLS VPN use (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 00:01:49 EDT)
  • Identity theft case could be largest so far (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 00:36:57 EDT)
  • Two industry forums plan to merge (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 11:39:49 EDT)
  • Re: Controls are ineffective without user cooperation (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 09:18:34 EDT)
  • Fwd: Crackdowns don't slow Internet piracy (Wed Jul 14 2004 - 17:10:39 EDT)
  • Off-Topic: N.Y. Buyout Firm Has Its Eye on MCI (Tue Jul 13 2004 - 22:09:31 EDT)
  • ICANN Panel Pans VeriSign Search Service (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 20:58:47 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publi cly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 01:17:27 EDT)
• Fisher, Shawn
  • Surge Protection (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 11:56:41 EDT)
  • Network Change Process - best method (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 15:29:59 EDT)
  • Interesting news story - Cisco Training Manual (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 16:03:12 EDT)
• Forrest W. Christian
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul - jack terminology (Sat Jul 24 2004 - 01:52:35 EDT)
• Gabriel
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 11:39:23 EDT)
• Geo.
  • rr.com (Tue Jul 20 2004 - 14:12:32 EDT)
• Gerald
  • Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 11:51:26 EDT)
• Greg Schwimer
  • CWDM or DWDM passive add/drop muxes (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 14:39:18 EDT)
• Gregh
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 17:26:51 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 08:43:01 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 08:37:31 EDT)
• Hank Nussbacher
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Sat Jul 17 2004 - 15:30:11 EDT)
• Hannigan, Martin
  • RE: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 16:47:03 EDT)
  • RE: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 12:37:37 EDT)
  • RE: mid-mount server rails (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 16:40:27 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 00:39:05 EDT)
• Hendrianto Muljawan
  • Traffic Volume Manager ? (Previously: RE: Regional differences in P2P) (Mon Jul 19 2004 - 05:11:28 EDT)
• Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE NCC)
  • Re: Looking for historical BGP announcement information (Wed Jul 14 2004 - 09:57:26 EDT)
• Henry Linneweh
  • Re: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS? (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 18:10:45 EDT)
  • RE: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 11:50:01 EDT)
  • Script Injection Makes Phishing Harder to Catch (Tue Jul 20 2004 - 12:20:55 EDT)
  • Re: China deploys Internet protocol version 9 network (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 04:16:05 EDT)
  • Re: Sipura VoIP phone adapters and DoS against name servers (Mon Jul 05 2004 - 13:08:26 EDT)
  • Re: E-Mail Snooping Ruled Permissible (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 01:10:59 EDT)
• Howard C. Berkowitz
  • RE: ARIN Comment (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 18:06:06 EDT)
• Ian Dickinson
  • RE: Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline (Mon Jul 19 2004 - 07:13:43 EDT)
  • RE: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Thu Jul 08 2004 - 16:44:23 EDT)
• Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: BGP Dampening question (Mon Jul 19 2004 - 17:06:32 EDT)
• Ingo Flaschberger
  • Re: CWDM or DWDM passive add/drop muxes (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 16:48:48 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 22:25:41 EDT)
  • isp software suite (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 21:36:08 EDT)
• J.D. Falk
  • Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 17:05:33 EDT)
  • Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 17:05:17 EDT)
• James
  • Re: as path filtering -- cisco implementation (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 14:47:16 EDT)
  • Re: Announcing a /19 from a /16 (Mon Jul 05 2004 - 17:51:58 EDT)
• James Couzens
  • Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 16:38:07 EDT)
• James Edwards
  • Re: ultradns reachability (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 21:45:33 EDT)
  • Re: Companies that sell NEBS x86 servers (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 18:15:09 EDT)
  • Re: E-Mail Snooping Ruled Permissible (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 17:09:08 EDT)
  • Re: E-Mail Snooping Ruled Permissible (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 02:13:29 EDT)
• Jamie C.Pole
  • Re: ABA to create standards for online authentication (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 19:57:01 EDT)
• Jared Mauch
  • Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? (Sat Jul 24 2004 - 21:53:57 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 21:32:14 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 15:42:47 EDT)
  • Re: Looking for historical BGP announcement information (Wed Jul 14 2004 - 10:04:20 EDT)
• Jason Frisvold
  • RE: Loss of Telnet Capability to 6509 (Wed Jul 28 2004 - 15:33:45 EDT)
• Jason Slagle
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 13:36:08 EDT)
• Jeff Aitken
  • Re: Off-Topic: N.Y. Buyout Firm Has Its Eye on MCI (Wed Jul 14 2004 - 08:21:15 EDT)
• Jeff Cole
  • Re: OT: Re: Critters (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 04:16:06 EDT)
• Jeff Kell
  • Re: OT: Re: Critters (Sun Jul 11 2004 - 14:46:17 EDT)
• Jeff Shultz
  • Re: 2511 line break (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 20:02:47 EDT)
  • Re: Google? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 11:40:17 EDT)
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 13:07:12 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 12:00:16 EDT)
  • Re: OT: Re: Critters (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 15:52:33 EDT)
• Jeff Wasilko
  • Re: Who broke .org? (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 11:22:34 EDT)
  • Re: Who broke .org? (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 14:48:14 EDT)
  • Re: Who broke .org? (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 14:32:50 EDT)
• Jeroen Massar
  • Re: [Fwd: [IP] Intriguing Progress of China's IPv9 Network Technology] (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 09:40:58 EDT)
• Jesper Skriver
  • Re: Quick question about secondary addresses (Sat Jul 31 2004 - 10:56:57 EDT)
• Jess Kitchen
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 15:52:01 EDT)
• Jim Devane
  • RE: CWDM or DWDM passive add/drop muxes (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 14:50:31 EDT)
• Jim Segrave
  • Re: Proxy scanning for spam (Wed Jul 07 2004 - 08:31:51 EDT)
• joe
  • Re: DNS with Akamai (Sat Jul 10 2004 - 13:07:27 EDT)
  • DNS with Akamai (Sat Jul 10 2004 - 00:20:31 EDT)
• Joe Abley
  • Re: 2511 line break (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 04:53:23 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 00:28:05 EDT)
  • Re: ultradns reachability (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 11:16:08 EDT)
  • Re: ultradns reachability (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 10:22:09 EDT)
• Joe Hamelin
  • Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall (Wed Jul 28 2004 - 12:06:53 EDT)
  • Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 22:24:24 EDT)
  • Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 19:21:37 EDT)
  • Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 16:07:26 EDT)
• Joe Maimon
  • Re: OT: xDSL hardware (Wed Jul 14 2004 - 07:14:15 EDT)
  • tunnel PMTUD with mss adjustment (Tue Jul 13 2004 - 08:10:25 EDT)
  • Re: Who broke .org? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 23:12:31 EDT)
• joe mcguckin
  • Re: Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 20:09:38 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Mon Jul 05 2004 - 13:55:42 EDT)
• Joe Provo
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Mon Jul 05 2004 - 08:05:46 EDT)
• Joe Shen
  • Relationship between DNS requests and server's CPU load (Thu Jul 08 2004 - 01:34:47 EDT)
  • Relationship between DNS requests and server's CPU load (Thu Jul 08 2004 - 00:17:48 EDT)
• Joel Jaeggli
  • RE: 2511 line break (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 10:47:36 EDT)
  • Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? (Sat Jul 24 2004 - 22:05:54 EDT)
• John Bittenbender
  • Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? (Sat Jul 24 2004 - 23:58:22 EDT)
  • SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? (Sat Jul 24 2004 - 21:49:41 EDT)
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 00:43:59 EDT)
• John Ferriby
  • RE: video distribution (Wed Jul 14 2004 - 16:51:40 EDT)
  • RE: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 00:14:39 EDT)
• John Hall
  • Re: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS? (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 18:55:27 EDT)
• John Kinsella
  • Re: Barrages of Packet Errors (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 13:04:24 EDT)
• John Kristoff
  • Re: Peering point speed publicly available? (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 10:23:17 EDT)
• John Obi
  • ICANN Adds IPv6 to Root DNS (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 03:10:33 EDT)
  • China deploys Internet protocol version 9 network (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 02:15:06 EDT)
• John Palmer
  • Re: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS? (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 18:21:26 EDT)
• John Payne
  • Re: DNS with Akamai (Sat Jul 10 2004 - 00:55:47 EDT)
• John Underhill
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Wed Jul 14 2004 - 16:12:13 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Wed Jul 14 2004 - 13:44:41 EDT)
• Jon Lewis
  • Re: Quick question about secondary addresses (Sat Jul 31 2004 - 11:59:38 EDT)
• Jon R. Kibler
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 12:44:46 EDT)
  • Re: Source of dictionary MTA attacks (Thu Jul 08 2004 - 15:43:35 EDT)
  • Source of dictionary MTA attacks (Thu Jul 08 2004 - 14:47:00 EDT)
• Jonathan Nichols
  • Re: Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 22:00:08 EDT)
  • Re: Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 18:53:24 EDT)
• Josh Fleishman
  • Network-based Security Solutions (Tue Jul 20 2004 - 16:56:51 EDT)
• k claffy
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Sat Jul 17 2004 - 21:58:58 EDT)
  • latest caida analysis of transit vs stuff, multihomed vs single-homed ASs (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 20:40:23 EDT)
  • Re: Peering point speed publicly available? (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 00:19:07 EDT)
  • Re: ultradns reachability (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 23:35:54 EDT)
• Karsten W. Rohrbach
  • Re: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS? (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 17:28:42 EDT)
• Ken Budd
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 09:33:40 EDT)
• Krichbaum, Eric
  • RE: Next hop issues inside AS577 to AS852? (Sat Jul 31 2004 - 08:27:35 EDT)
• Krzysztof Adamski
  • Re: Controls are ineffective without user cooperation (Sun Dec 12 1999 - 20:55:08 EST)
• Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 02:15:11 EDT)
• Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.
  • Re: Quick question about secondary addresses (Sat Jul 31 2004 - 13:38:40 EDT)
  • Re: Convention networks and viruses (Thu Jul 29 2004 - 10:11:51 EDT)
  • Re: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS? (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 22:01:03 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 18:02:05 EDT)
  • Re: Google? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 15:30:01 EDT)
  • Re: Google? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 14:35:43 EDT)
  • Re: Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 20:16:29 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 12:31:05 EDT)
• Leo Bicknell
  • Re: DS-3 extended demarc photos (Fri Jul 30 2004 - 12:54:01 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 08:46:49 EDT)
  • Re: ultradns reachability (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 09:06:58 EDT)
  • Re: ultradns reachability (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 11:27:41 EDT)
  • Re: ultradns reachability (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 10:43:17 EDT)
• Lloyd Taylor
  • Re: DNS with Akamai (Sat Jul 10 2004 - 11:15:42 EDT)
  • Re: DNS with Akamai (Sat Jul 10 2004 - 11:01:22 EDT)
• Marco Davids (SARA)
  • Re: Google? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 11:35:17 EDT)
  • Google? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 11:28:00 EDT)
• Marcus Reid
  • Re: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS? (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 13:16:04 EDT)
• Mark Barker
  • Re: OT: Re: Critters (Sat Jul 10 2004 - 11:01:38 EDT)
• Mark Borchers
  • RE: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 11:31:26 EDT)
• Mark Kent
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 13:57:20 EDT)
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 12:39:43 EDT)
  • Re: Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 18:07:42 EDT)
• Mark Kosters
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 17:04:24 EDT)
• Mark Radabaugh
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 10:17:33 EDT)
• Marshall Eubanks
  • Re: Surge Protection (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 16:25:57 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 09:30:03 EDT)
  • Re: video distribution (Wed Jul 14 2004 - 16:31:51 EDT)
  • Re: OT: Re: Critters (Sun Jul 11 2004 - 12:07:06 EDT)
  • Re: [Fwd: [IP] Intriguing Progress of China's IPv9 Network Technology] (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 10:18:30 EDT)
• Martin Hepworth
  • Re: Google? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 13:00:10 EDT)
• Matt Ghali
  • Re: ultradns reachability (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 20:55:13 EDT)
  • ultradns reachability (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 21:01:29 EDT)
• Matt Hess
  • OT? experience with time warner telecom? (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 16:49:20 EDT)
• Matt Larson
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 22:33:57 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Wed Jul 14 2004 - 18:51:51 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Sat Jul 10 2004 - 00:03:03 EDT)
  • VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 15:20:43 EDT)
• Matthew Crocker
  • Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 20:03:08 EDT)
  • Re: Sipura VoIP phone adapters and DoS against name servers (Mon Jul 05 2004 - 13:32:42 EDT)
• Mehmet Akcin
  • YNT: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS? (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 13:05:56 EDT)
• Michael Hallgren
  • RE: Announcing a /19 from a /16 (Mon Jul 05 2004 - 17:50:30 EDT)
  • RE: Announcing a /19 from a /16 (Mon Jul 05 2004 - 17:49:09 EDT)
• Michael Loftis
  • RE: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 01:48:19 EDT)
• Michael Painter
  • Re: Campus size Wireless LAN (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 19:06:09 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 00:25:14 EDT)
• Michael Smith
  • RE: 802.17 RPR and L2 Ethernet interoperablity (Ethernet over RPR) (Wed Jul 07 2004 - 11:07:32 EDT)
  • RE: 802.17 RPR and L2 Ethernet interoperablity (Ethernet over RPR) (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 23:50:04 EDT)
  • RE: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 13:57:20 EDT)
• Michel Py
  • RE: Quick question. (Sat Jul 31 2004 - 23:51:49 EDT)
  • Faster site: DS-3 extended demarc photos (Fri Jul 30 2004 - 12:50:54 EDT)
  • DS-3 extended demarc photos (Fri Jul 30 2004 - 12:02:38 EDT)
  • RE: COnfiguration Suggestion - Etherchannel (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 22:54:43 EDT)
  • RE: 2511 line break (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 12:14:54 EDT)
  • RE: 2511 line break (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 11:35:56 EDT)
  • RE: 2511 line break (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 02:03:34 EDT)
  • RE: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 15:48:34 EDT)
  • RE: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 13:26:08 EDT)
  • RE: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul - jack terminology (Sat Jul 24 2004 - 17:30:36 EDT)
  • RE: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Sat Jul 24 2004 - 17:13:42 EDT)
  • RE: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul - jack terminology (Sat Jul 24 2004 - 15:23:23 EDT)
  • RE: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 23:11:08 EDT)
  • RE: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 00:15:53 EDT)
  • RE: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 22:51:42 EDT)
  • RE: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 11:31:54 EDT)
  • RE: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 23:35:46 EDT)
  • RE: Regional differences in P2P (Mon Jul 19 2004 - 12:54:42 EDT)
  • RE: Regional differences in P2P (Sat Jul 17 2004 - 15:49:35 EDT)
  • RE: Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 21:45:16 EDT)
  • RE: Regional differences in P2P (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 21:15:53 EDT)
  • RE: Regional differences in P2P (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 15:27:58 EDT)
  • RE: Regional differences in P2P (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 00:16:08 EDT)
  • RE: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 01:48:15 EDT)
  • RE: Crackdowns don't slow Internet piracy (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 01:27:01 EDT)
  • RE: Crackdowns don't slow Internet piracy (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 00:36:26 EDT)
  • RE: xDSL hardware (Tue Jul 13 2004 - 22:14:56 EDT)
  • RE: Problems with private justice (was Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious) (Tue Jul 13 2004 - 07:57:25 EDT)
  • RE: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Tue Jul 13 2004 - 07:07:25 EDT)
  • RE: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Tue Jul 13 2004 - 07:05:23 EDT)
  • RE: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 12:33:36 EDT)
  • RE: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 10:41:54 EDT)
  • RE: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 00:45:09 EDT)
  • RE: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 00:34:53 EDT)
  • RE: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Sun Jul 11 2004 - 23:24:19 EDT)
  • RE: Quick circuit question. (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 13:43:33 EDT)
  • RE: ARIN Comment (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 21:45:05 EDT)
• Mikael Abrahamsson
  • Re: CWDM or DWDM passive add/drop muxes (Wed Jul 28 2004 - 06:21:42 EDT)
  • Re: Traffic Volume Manager ? (Previously: RE: Regional differences in P2P) (Mon Jul 19 2004 - 05:17:59 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Mon Jul 19 2004 - 03:22:23 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Sun Jul 18 2004 - 09:50:24 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Sun Jul 18 2004 - 05:48:47 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Sun Jul 18 2004 - 02:53:35 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 16:59:16 EDT)
  • RE: Regional differences in P2P (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 15:46:06 EDT)
  • RE: Regional differences in P2P (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 04:16:23 EDT)
  • RE: Regional differences in P2P (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 01:44:05 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 09:52:28 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 05:25:06 EDT)
  • RE: 802.17 RPR and L2 Ethernet interoperablity (Ethernet over RPR) (Wed Jul 07 2004 - 09:36:56 EDT)
  • RE: 802.17 RPR and L2 Ethernet interoperablity (Ethernet over RPR) (Wed Jul 07 2004 - 06:51:34 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 16:50:16 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 16:04:37 EDT)
  • RE: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 15:37:12 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 15:24:17 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 13:22:02 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 12:25:57 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 12:10:50 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 12:02:21 EDT)
• Mike Leber
  • Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 22:38:28 EDT)
• Mike Lewinski
  • Re: Surge Protection (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 13:53:55 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Sat Jul 10 2004 - 22:35:36 EDT)
  • Re: Peering point speed publicly available? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 21:09:21 EDT)
• Mike Nice
  • Re: Surge Protection (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 16:35:29 EDT)
• Mike Sawicki
  • Re: COnfiguration Suggestion - Etherchannel (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 22:45:10 EDT)
• Mike Tancsa
  • RE: Next hop issues inside AS577 to AS852? (Sat Jul 31 2004 - 14:21:31 EDT)
  • Next hop issues inside AS577 to AS852? (Sat Jul 31 2004 - 07:51:58 EDT)
• Nicole
  • Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 17:45:22 EDT)
• Niels Bakker
  • Re: 2511 line break (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 15:53:36 EDT)
  • Re: What ever happened to... MARP (Multi-Access Reachability Protocol) (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 12:07:12 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Wed Jul 14 2004 - 15:31:10 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points (Mon Jul 05 2004 - 07:02:37 EDT)
  • Re: E-Mail Snooping Ruled Permissible (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 17:09:52 EDT)
• Nils Ketelsen
  • Re: Google? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 13:55:23 EDT)
• Patrick Muldoon
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Thu Jul 08 2004 - 20:21:51 EDT)
• Patrick W Gilmore
  • Re: Controls are ineffective without user cooperation (Sat Jul 17 2004 - 14:35:31 EDT)
  • Re: BGP Dampening question (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 01:41:10 EDT)
  • Re: Crackdowns don't slow Internet piracy (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 01:12:06 EDT)
  • Re: Off-Topic: N.Y. Buyout Firm Has Its Eye on MCI (Tue Jul 13 2004 - 22:15:43 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 00:24:34 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Mon Jul 05 2004 - 20:00:22 EDT)
  • concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 01:00:35 EDT)
  • Re: Who broke .org? (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 14:38:12 EDT)
  • Re: ARIN Comment (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 16:29:08 EDT)
• Paul Gilbert
  • RE: Enterprises indicate plans for MPLS VPN use (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 10:19:12 EDT)
• Paul Jakma
  • Re: Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline (Mon Jul 19 2004 - 00:09:42 EDT)
• Paul Ryan
  • RE: Loss of Telnet Capability - RESOLVED (Thu Jul 29 2004 - 14:24:32 EDT)
  • RE: Loss of Telnet Capability to 6509 (Wed Jul 28 2004 - 16:03:04 EDT)
• Paul Vixie
  • Re: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS? (Wed Jul 28 2004 - 10:20:32 EDT)
  • Re: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS? (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 21:44:39 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Sat Jul 24 2004 - 19:41:15 EDT)
  • that MIT paper again (Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net ) (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 13:01:54 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 11:34:20 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 03:24:17 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 03:15:32 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 13:08:54 EDT)
  • plumbers coming down the pipe (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 17:40:56 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 17:20:52 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 12:18:34 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 00:56:58 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Mon Jul 05 2004 - 21:43:14 EDT)
• Peering
  • RE: Loss of Telnet Capability to 6509 (Wed Jul 28 2004 - 16:10:23 EDT)
• Pendergrass, Greg
  • RE: Google? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 12:56:14 EDT)
• Per Gregers Bilse
  • Re: Who broke .org? (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 06:28:10 EDT)
• Pete Schroebel
  • Network Solutions, Inc. Registrar (R122-LRMS) Status: INACTIVE ? (Sat Jul 24 2004 - 23:02:17 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 15:18:35 EDT)
• Pete Templin
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 10:36:59 EDT)
• Peter Corlett
  • Re: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS? (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 13:59:44 EDT)
  • Re: Whois/RWhois Server - what is everyone running..? (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 04:46:22 EDT)
  • Re: Quick circuit question. (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 14:20:35 EDT)
  • Re: Quick circuit question. (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 13:43:24 EDT)
• Peter Galbavy
  • Re: Controls are ineffective without user cooperation (Sat Jul 17 2004 - 10:06:22 EDT)
• Petri Helenius
  • Re: Convention networks and viruses (Thu Jul 29 2004 - 15:05:04 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 14:34:34 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 07:00:44 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 13:38:33 EDT)
  • Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 13:41:03 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 05:41:33 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Sun Jul 18 2004 - 14:44:10 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Sun Jul 18 2004 - 02:44:53 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Sat Jul 17 2004 - 04:27:24 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Sat Jul 17 2004 - 04:24:39 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 17:00:04 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 14:51:28 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 09:55:56 EDT)
  • Re: Fwd: Crackdowns don't slow Internet piracy (Wed Jul 14 2004 - 17:36:21 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Tue Jul 13 2004 - 17:37:28 EDT)
• Philip Lavine
  • as path filtering -- cisco implementation (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 12:31:54 EDT)
• RAMARAJAN, ARVIND, ALABS
  • RE: Quick question. (Thu Jul 29 2004 - 13:26:43 EDT)
• Randy Bush
  • Re: 2511 line break (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 15:22:25 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 14:52:39 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 00:37:06 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 18:10:40 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 17:55:17 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 17:40:29 EDT)
  • Re: Google? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 15:16:24 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 14:01:09 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 14:54:38 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 13:32:42 EDT)
  • 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 12:45:51 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Sat Jul 24 2004 - 19:48:27 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 16:00:39 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 21:27:37 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 20:46:41 EDT)
  • Re: Looking for historical BGP announcement information (Tue Jul 13 2004 - 15:43:41 EDT)
  • Re: Quick circuit question. (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 11:40:19 EDT)
  • Re: China deploys Internet protocol version 9 network (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 02:30:05 EDT)
  • Re: Sipura VoIP phone adapters and DoS against name servers (Mon Jul 05 2004 - 13:03:20 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 18:49:07 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 16:39:03 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 16:14:32 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 15:59:56 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 12:20:04 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 11:47:11 EDT)
• ren
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 08:28:50 EDT)
• Ricardo \
  • Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? (Wed Jul 28 2004 - 11:12:15 EDT)
  • Re: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS? (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 12:59:00 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 02:30:37 EDT)
• Richard A Steenbergen
  • Re: Crackdowns don't slow Internet piracy (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 09:26:31 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 12:28:46 EDT)
  • Re: South Florida IXes (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 14:29:57 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 16:20:13 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 13:56:21 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 10:54:10 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 02:07:06 EDT)
  • Re: Peering point speed publicly available? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 22:35:22 EDT)
  • Re: Peering point speed publicly available? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 22:09:38 EDT)
  • Who broke .org? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 21:40:07 EDT)
  • Re: Peering point speed publicly available? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 21:30:15 EDT)
  • Re: ARIN Comment (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 17:12:39 EDT)
• Richard Cox
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 05:29:10 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 21:19:55 EDT)
  • Re: Need 3M System Admin contact (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 12:37:08 EDT)
• Richard J. Sears
  • Loss of Telnet Capability - RESOLVED (Wed Jul 28 2004 - 16:18:40 EDT)
  • Re: Loss of Telnet Capability to 6509 (Wed Jul 28 2004 - 15:34:37 EDT)
  • Re: Loss of Telnet Capability to 6509 (Wed Jul 28 2004 - 15:02:40 EDT)
  • Loss of Telnet Capability to 6509 (Wed Jul 28 2004 - 14:54:07 EDT)
  • Re: COnfiguration Suggestion - Etherchannel (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 22:39:54 EDT)
  • COnfiguration Suggestion - Etherchannel (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 22:23:29 EDT)
  • Whois/RWhois Server - what is everyone running..? (Tue Jul 20 2004 - 16:53:03 EDT)
• Richard Welty
  • Re: 2511 line break (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 19:40:59 EDT)
  • Re: Critters (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 10:00:47 EDT)
• Rob Nelson
  • Re: Campus size Wireless LAN (Sat Jul 24 2004 - 12:00:56 EDT)
• Robert A. Hayden
  • Followup: Inexpensive Telephone Conference Bridge System (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 10:36:27 EDT)
  • Inexpensive Telephone Conference Bridge System (Tue Jul 20 2004 - 19:05:15 EDT)
• Robert Blayzor
  • Re: ATM/IP video (Thu Jul 29 2004 - 08:29:22 EDT)
  • Re: COnfiguration Suggestion - Etherchannel (Thu Jul 29 2004 - 08:22:54 EDT)
  • Re: Loss of Telnet Capability to 6509 (Wed Jul 28 2004 - 15:03:44 EDT)
  • Re: COnfiguration Suggestion - Etherchannel (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 23:09:37 EDT)
  • Re: COnfiguration Suggestion - Etherchannel (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 22:53:56 EDT)
  • Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 22:55:02 EDT)
• Robert Bonomi
  • Re: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS? (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 12:54:40 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 16:06:43 EDT)
  • Re: Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline (Tue Jul 20 2004 - 00:06:55 EDT)
  • anybody got functioning contacts at shaw.ca ? (Mon Jul 19 2004 - 13:11:25 EDT)
  • Re: OT: Re: Critters (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 17:49:21 EDT)
  • Re: OT: Re: Critters (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 17:43:48 EDT)
  • Re: "it appears a beaver picked it up and chewed it in half" (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 01:48:46 EDT)
  • Re: Need 3M System Admin contact (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 12:41:35 EDT)
• Robert Boyle
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 09:19:48 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 15:41:30 EDT)
• Robert Crowe
  • RE: COnfiguration Suggestion - Etherchannel (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 22:40:16 EDT)
• Robert E. Seastrom
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 15:56:04 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 14:17:19 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Sat Jul 24 2004 - 20:47:03 EDT)
• Robert L Mathews
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 20:24:07 EDT)
• Routing Table Analysis
  • Weekly Routing Table Report (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 14:06:19 EDT)
  • Weekly Routing Table Report (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 14:05:41 EDT)
  • Weekly Routing Table Report (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 14:06:25 EDT)
  • Weekly Routing Table Report (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 14:06:23 EDT)
• Roy
  • RE: Campus size Wireless LAN (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 14:19:58 EDT)
  • RE: xDSL hardware (Wed Jul 14 2004 - 02:08:08 EDT)
• Rubens Kuhl Jr.
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 00:43:50 EDT)
• Sam Stickland
  • What ever happened to... MARP (Multi-Access Reachability Protocol) (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 09:09:32 EDT)
  • RE: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (fwd from ml) (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 13:27:22 EDT)
  • RE: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (fwd from ml) (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 13:02:31 EDT)
  • RE: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 07:03:43 EDT)
  • Re: OT: xDSL hardware (Wed Jul 14 2004 - 07:54:13 EDT)
  • Re: OT: xDSL hardware (Wed Jul 14 2004 - 06:17:43 EDT)
  • RE: 802.17 RPR and L2 Ethernet interoperablity (Ethernet over RPR) (Wed Jul 07 2004 - 09:17:54 EDT)
  • RE: 802.17 RPR and L2 Ethernet interoperablity (Ethernet over RPR) (Wed Jul 07 2004 - 06:27:37 EDT)
• Scot Bryhan
  • "it appears a beaver picked it up and chewed it in half" (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 00:38:50 EDT)
• Scott Blomquist
  • Re: Campus size Wireless LAN (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 16:22:10 EDT)
• Scott Call
  • Re: Google? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 13:05:12 EDT)
• Scott McGrath
  • Re: Surge Protection (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 14:51:29 EDT)
  • RE: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 21:33:07 EDT)
• Scott Savage
  • Re: Telecom fraud on the rise (Sat Jul 10 2004 - 23:15:36 EDT)
• Scott Stursa
  • Re: "it appears a beaver picked it up and chewed it in half" (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 09:13:26 EDT)
  • Re: WTF --- (Fri Jul 09 2004 - 09:12:03 EDT)
• Scott Weeks
  • Re: Convention networks and viruses (Thu Jul 29 2004 - 20:17:58 EDT)
  • Re: Convention networks and viruses (Thu Jul 29 2004 - 10:45:50 EDT)
  • Re: Convention networks and viruses (Thu Jul 29 2004 - 10:06:59 EDT)
  • RE: Quick circuit question. (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 15:33:28 EDT)
  • Re: Quick circuit question. (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 15:13:15 EDT)
• Sean Donelan
  • Convention networks and viruses (Thu Jul 29 2004 - 03:16:06 EDT)
  • Re: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS? (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 17:28:47 EDT)
  • ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS? (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 12:34:04 EDT)
  • Mydoom versus Google (and others) (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 13:03:24 EDT)
  • DNC service providers (Sat Jul 24 2004 - 02:16:23 EDT)
  • Follow the money - Extortion gang caught (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 14:06:52 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Sun Jul 18 2004 - 03:11:56 EDT)
  • Controls are ineffective without user cooperation (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 01:22:50 EDT)
  • Regional differences in P2P (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 04:05:14 EDT)
  • Problems with private justice (was Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious) (Tue Jul 13 2004 - 04:20:13 EDT)
  • ABA to create standards for online authentication (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 05:24:46 EDT)
  • Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Sun Jul 11 2004 - 23:14:09 EDT)
  • Telecom fraud on the rise (Sat Jul 10 2004 - 18:59:37 EDT)
• Simon Brilus
  • Yahoo and Intel e-mail servers (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 05:10:25 EDT)
• Simon Waters
  • Re: that MIT paper again (Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net ) (longish) (Fri Jul 23 2004 - 17:30:46 EDT)
• SKH
  • (no subject) (Mon Jul 19 2004 - 02:27:59 EDT)
• snort bsd
  • ppt file for "US-Sprint Optical Internet Design"? (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 20:15:48 EDT)
• Stephen J. Wilcox
  • Re: 2511 line break (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 19:50:19 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 17:52:14 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 17:33:50 EDT)
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 13:55:57 EDT)
  • RE: Google? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 13:59:07 EDT)
  • RE: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 07:26:04 EDT)
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 09:15:24 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Sun Jul 18 2004 - 09:43:38 EDT)
  • Re: Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline (Sat Jul 17 2004 - 15:11:53 EDT)
  • Re: Controls are ineffective without user cooperation (Sat Jul 17 2004 - 08:22:09 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 11:27:26 EDT)
  • Re: Quick circuit question. (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 11:25:28 EDT)
  • Re: Proxy scanning for spam (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 06:08:38 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 14:01:11 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 06:41:12 EDT)
  • Re: ultradns reachability (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 15:39:49 EDT)
  • RE: Peering point speed publicly available? (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 02:12:18 EDT)
• Stephen Perciballi
  • Re: anybody got functioning contacts at shaw.ca ? (Mon Jul 19 2004 - 23:44:04 EDT)
• Stephen Stuart
  • Re: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS? (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 13:21:24 EDT)
  • Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 17:22:20 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 17:15:20 EDT)
• Steve Baxter
  • Re: as path filtering -- cisco implementation (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 15:56:19 EDT)
• Steve Gibbard
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Mon Jul 05 2004 - 04:18:25 EDT)
• Steven M. Bellovin
  • Re: 2511 line break (Tue Jul 27 2004 - 06:56:30 EDT)
  • Re: [WAY OT]: concern over public peering points... (Thu Jul 08 2004 - 19:34:50 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Thu Jul 08 2004 - 13:20:28 EDT)
• Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS
  • RE: [WAY OT]: concern over public peering points... (Thu Jul 08 2004 - 18:30:29 EDT)
  • Re: Peering point speed publicly available? (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 21:31:16 EDT)
• Suresh Ramasubramanian
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 23:05:27 EDT)
  • Re: Transfer Capping by ISPs (Was: Regional differences in P2P) (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 10:59:05 EDT)
  • Re: OT: Re: Critters (Sun Jul 11 2004 - 13:14:36 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Sat Jul 10 2004 - 23:04:34 EDT)
  • [Fwd: 2.65 Gbits/s will become available for sale to/from India on FLAG] (Wed Jul 07 2004 - 02:02:39 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 09:47:12 EDT)
  • Re: [Fwd: [IP] Intriguing Progress of China's IPv9 Network Technology] (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 09:57:24 EDT)
  • [Fwd: [IP] Intriguing Progress of China's IPv9 Network Technology] (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 09:04:21 EDT)
  • Re: Appeals court deals setback to spammers (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 06:13:58 EDT)
• Tim Wilde
  • Re: Who broke .org? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 22:11:30 EDT)
• Timo Mohre
  • Re: [Fwd: [IP] Intriguing Progress of China's IPv9 Network Technology] (Fri Jul 02 2004 - 09:52:30 EDT)
• Todd Christell
  • Re: Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline (Mon Jul 19 2004 - 15:03:37 EDT)
• Todd Mitchell - lists
  • Re: Google? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 11:39:34 EDT)
• Tom (UnitedLayer)
  • Re: Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline (Sat Jul 17 2004 - 15:02:26 EDT)
  • Re: OT: Re: Critters (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 15:31:07 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Thu Jul 08 2004 - 22:14:31 EDT)
  • Re: China deploys Internet protocol version 9 network (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 15:24:14 EDT)
• Tony Li
  • Re: Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline (Fri Jul 16 2004 - 19:34:50 EDT)
  • Re: .mil routing issues (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 20:31:30 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Mon Jul 05 2004 - 20:35:50 EDT)
  • Re: Peering point speed publicly available? (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 21:02:06 EDT)
• Tracey Webb
  • ATM/IP video (Thu Jul 29 2004 - 08:18:06 EDT)
• Troy Davis
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Sat Jul 03 2004 - 18:38:43 EDT)
• Tycho Eggen
  • working sltnet.lk contact (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 02:57:45 EDT)
• Vicky
  • [OT] Layer 2 Trace (Thu Jul 08 2004 - 13:26:44 EDT)
• vijay gill
  • Re: 2511 line break (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 17:17:42 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 11:15:55 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 00:32:14 EDT)
  • Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] (Mon Jul 05 2004 - 14:02:03 EDT)
• Vinay Bannai
  • RE: 802.17 RPR and L2 Ethernet interoperablity (Ethernet over RPR) (Thu Jul 08 2004 - 20:11:28 EDT)
• Vish Yelsangikar
  • Quick question. (Thu Jul 29 2004 - 00:57:20 EDT)
• W.D.McKinney
  • Re: PPPoE questions (Thu Jul 29 2004 - 18:33:56 EDT)
• Walter De Smedt
  • Re: Traffic Volume Manager ? (Previously: RE: Regional differences in P2P) (Mon Jul 19 2004 - 06:57:48 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Sun Jul 18 2004 - 10:59:57 EDT)
  • Re: Regional differences in P2P (Sun Jul 18 2004 - 08:31:16 EDT)
• Wayne E. Bouchard
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 14:30:06 EDT)
  • Re: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 13:38:26 EDT)
• Will Hargrave
  • Re: CWDM or DWDM passive add/drop muxes (Wed Jul 28 2004 - 06:11:23 EDT)
• William Allen Simpson
  • Re: ARIN Comment (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 16:15:53 EDT)
  • Re: E-Mail Snooping Ruled Permissible (Thu Jul 01 2004 - 11:02:09 EDT)
• William Petrisko
  • Re: Campus size Wireless LAN (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 21:07:53 EDT)
• William Warren
  • Re: Off-Topic: N.Y. Buyout Firm Has Its Eye on MCI (Tue Jul 13 2004 - 22:25:29 EDT)
  • Re: Problems with private justice (was Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious) (Tue Jul 13 2004 - 08:02:58 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 18:49:24 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 08:04:10 EDT)
• william(at)elan.net
  • Re: Google? (Mon Jul 26 2004 - 14:11:47 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Sat Jul 24 2004 - 00:23:51 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 22:14:08 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 18:33:16 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 17:58:46 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Wed Jul 14 2004 - 17:54:04 EDT)
  • Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 08:54:04 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 07:35:36 EDT)
• Williams, Jeff
  • RE: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 11:01:57 EDT)
  • RE: [WAY OT]: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering po int speed publicly available?] (Thu Jul 08 2004 - 12:30:23 EDT)
  • RE: Quick circuit question. (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 15:21:28 EDT)

Last message date: Sat Jul 31 2004 - 23:53:18 EDT
Archived on: Thu Dec 09 2004 - 16:10:31 EST

743 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
About this archive
Other mail archives