Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?]

From: vijay gill (no email)
Date: Mon Jul 05 2004 - 14:02:03 EDT

• Next message: Eric Pylko: "Announcing a /19 from a /16"
• Previous message: joe mcguckin: "Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?]"
• Maybe in reply to: Patrick W Gilmore: "concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?]"
• Next in thread: Patrick W Gilmore: "Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?]"
• Reply: Patrick W Gilmore: "Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 10:55:42AM -0700, joe mcguckin wrote:
>
> $5000 for an ethernet switch port? It makes me long for the days of throwing
> ethernet cables over the ceiling to informally peer with other networks in a

Throwing ethernet cables over the ceiling does not scale.

/vijay

• Next message: Eric Pylko: "Announcing a /19 from a /16"
• Previous message: joe mcguckin: "Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?]"
• Maybe in reply to: Patrick W Gilmore: "concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?]"
• Next in thread: Patrick W Gilmore: "Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?]"
• Reply: Patrick W Gilmore: "Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]