Nanog 0404
By Author

869 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
About this archive
Other mail archives

Starting: Thu Apr 01 2004 - 00:45:21 EST
Ending: Fri Apr 30 2004 - 10:13:57 EDT

• John Brown (CV)
  • Xspedius / E.Spire as wellRe: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 17:30:30 EDT)
• (no email)
  • RE: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 08:55:56 EDT)
  • RE: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 08:51:03 EDT)
• (no name)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Apr 30 2004 - 08:00:00 EDT)
  • Re: Buying and selling root certificates (Thu Apr 29 2004 - 11:03:24 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 15:50:45 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 14:11:04 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200orother vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 07:07:14 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200orother vendor ? (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 09:21:11 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 orother vendor ? (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 09:04:14 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 orother vendor ? (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 07:58:07 EDT)
  • Re: Juniper failes to change keys (More MD5 fun: Cisco uses wrongMD5key for old session after key change) (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 06:46:08 EDT)
  • Re: Juniper failes to change keys (More MD5 fun: Cisco uses wrong MD5key for old session after key change) (Sat Apr 24 2004 - 16:46:58 EDT)
  • More MD5 fun: Cisco uses wrong MD5 key for old session after key change (Sat Apr 24 2004 - 16:21:03 EDT)
  • Re: Alternate and/or hidden infrastructure addresses (BGP/TCP RST/SYNvulnerability) (Fri Apr 23 2004 - 10:36:15 EDT)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Apr 23 2004 - 08:00:00 EDT)
  • Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 14:45:36 EDT)
  • Re: Ad blocking with squid (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 11:56:24 EDT)
  • Re: Xspedius / E.Spire as wellRe: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 00:53:26 EDT)
  • Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 16:49:01 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 16:04:54 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 15:39:51 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 15:21:09 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 11:54:53 EDT)
  • Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 15:11:49 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 16:06:06 EDT)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 08:00:00 EDT)
  • Re: SORBS Insanity (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 09:30:56 EDT)
  • Re: SORBS Insanity (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 23:38:09 EDT)
  • RE: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 12:05:56 EDT)
  • RE: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 09:46:29 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 05:24:44 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 05:18:10 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 05:07:35 EDT)
  • Dialin access in USA, off list (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 13:22:16 EDT)
  • Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 19:20:59 EDT)
  • Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 16:29:43 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 16:59:07 EDT)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 08:00:01 EDT)
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Wed Apr 07 2004 - 07:18:56 EDT)
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 16:43:56 EDT)
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 14:43:39 EDT)
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 13:28:57 EDT)
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 12:37:29 EDT)
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 05:23:34 EDT)
  • Re: Mailserver requirements (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 17:57:23 EDT)
  • RE: Mailserver requirements (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 17:30:36 EDT)
  • Re: Mailserver requirements (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 17:21:21 EDT)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Apr 02 2004 - 07:00:11 EST)
  • RFC2549 revisited (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 11:06:12 EST)
  • Re: the value of reverse address lookups? (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 10:21:47 EST)
  • Re: Spam with no purpose? (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 10:19:02 EST)
  • RE: MLPPP Follow Up - How we fixed the problem (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 09:38:37 EST)
  • Re: Spam with no purpose? (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 09:00:18 EST)
• Adam Debus
  • Looking for contact at RoadRunner (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 14:34:09 EDT)
• Adam Rothschild
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 11:13:26 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 06:44:14 EDT)
• Adi Linden
  • Re: The Uneducated Enduser (Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT)) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 12:00:45 EDT)
  • The Uneducated Enduser (Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT)) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 10:21:02 EDT)
• Aditya
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 12:42:18 EDT)
• Adrian Chadd
  • Re: Ordering Windows Security Update CD (was Re: Microsoft XP SP2) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 02:20:22 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 05:44:33 EDT)
• Alan Sparks
  • RE: hotmail-msn (Fri Apr 30 2004 - 10:12:30 EDT)
  • Re: hotmail issues (Tue Apr 27 2004 - 15:41:56 EDT)
• Alex Bligh
  • Juniper & DoS (Tue Apr 27 2004 - 04:06:10 EDT)
  • Re: Alternate and/or hidden infrastructure addresses (BGP/TCP RST/SYN vulnerability) (Fri Apr 23 2004 - 11:00:20 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 08:23:40 EDT)
  • RE: Lazy network operators (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 08:15:52 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 07:14:37 EDT)
• Alex Rubenstein
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 19:57:25 EDT)
• Alexander Hagen
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 orother vendor ? (Tue Apr 27 2004 - 18:42:10 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? (Tue Apr 27 2004 - 06:56:03 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 02:27:14 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 orother vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 02:18:50 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 orother vendor ? (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 09:33:49 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 orother vendor ? (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 09:06:49 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 08:41:30 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 06:48:34 EDT)
• Alexei Roudnev
  • Re: Buying and selling root certificates (Thu Apr 29 2004 - 01:45:04 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 04:13:44 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 01:31:25 EDT)
  • Re: More MD5 fun: Cisco uses wrong MD5 key for old session after key change (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 01:28:19 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 03:34:35 EDT)
  • Re: Massive stupidity (Was: Re: TCP vulnerability) (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 03:25:19 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 03:14:55 EDT)
  • Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 02:43:38 EDT)
  • Re: Ordering Windows Security Update CD (was Re: Microsoft XP SP2) (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 02:39:28 EDT)
  • Re: Ordering Windows Security Update CD (was Re: Microsoft XP SP2) (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 02:37:01 EDT)
  • Re: snmp vuln (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 02:24:28 EDT)
  • Re: Ordering Windows Security Update CD (was Re: Microsoft XP SP2) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 02:21:56 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 01:53:43 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 01:51:20 EDT)
  • Re: remote reboot power strips (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 01:50:00 EDT)
• Allison Mankin
  • re: TCP vulnerability (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 15:04:09 EDT)
• Andrew - Supernews
  • Re: Monitoring dark address space? (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 05:42:49 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 04:00:44 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 16:54:40 EDT)
• Andy Dills
  • Re: Xspedius / E.Spire as wellRe: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 17:51:11 EDT)
• Andy Johnson
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 12:25:18 EDT)
  • Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 10:49:15 EDT)
• Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
  • IDDB: Companion Domains Database to IADB (and IADB Update) (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 12:22:40 EDT)
• Arnold Nipper
  • Re: Mailserver requirements (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 17:53:15 EDT)
  • Re: Mailserver requirements (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 17:32:08 EDT)
  • Mailserver requirements (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 17:03:05 EDT)
• Aviva Garrett
  • Re: TCP vulnerability (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 13:59:52 EDT)
• Avleen Vig
  • Re: Postmaster, hostmaster etc.... (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 00:56:16 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 00:29:34 EDT)
• Blaine Christian
  • RE: IP economics morphed into (TCP/RST) (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 11:06:17 EDT)
  • IP economics morphed into (TCP/RST) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 15:29:29 EDT)
  • RE: BGP TTL check in 12.3(7)T (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 14:37:55 EDT)
  • RE: BGP TTL check in 12.3(7)T (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 12:50:25 EDT)
  • RE: BGP TTL check in 12.3(7)T (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 11:02:49 EDT)
• Bogdan SURDU
  • Re: Automated Copyright Notice System (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 08:29:41 EDT)
• Brandon Butterworth
  • Re: New IPv4 Allocations for APNIC (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 14:33:37 EDT)
• Brandon Shiers
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 23:40:14 EDT)
• Brian Moore
  • Re: Mexico City Internet Bandwidth suggestions (Thu Apr 29 2004 - 21:38:11 EDT)
• Brian Russo
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 11:00:33 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 10:51:18 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 06:27:24 EDT)
• Burton, Chris
  • RE: tcp bgp vulnerability looking glass and route server issues. (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 19:46:02 EDT)
  • RE: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 14:32:57 EDT)
• Callahan, Richard M, GVSOL
  • RE: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 16:08:03 EDT)
  • RE: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 15:25:45 EDT)
• Carlos Friacas
  • Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 10:15:32 EDT)
• Carol Wadsworth
  • NANOG 31 Meeting Information (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 11:29:23 EDT)
• Cemil Degirmenci
  • Nmap to print out the MAC addresses of scanned hosts (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 19:58:15 EDT)
  • Re: remote reboot power strips (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 16:09:56 EDT)
• Charles Sprickman
  • Re: Xspedius / E.Spire as wellRe: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 16:48:37 EDT)
  • Re: Mailserver requirements (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 17:25:05 EDT)
• Cheung, Rick
  • RE: remote reboot power strips (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 08:59:19 EDT)
• Chris Adams
  • Re: Spam with no purpose? (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 23:53:51 EDT)
• Chris Boyd
  • Lazy network operators (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 15:26:46 EDT)
• Chris Brenton
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 08:22:48 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 06:12:16 EDT)
• Chris Griffin
  • Re: hotmail issues (Tue Apr 27 2004 - 15:23:13 EDT)
• Chris Moody
  • Re: Cisco Rolls Major Patches to TCP Flaw (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 19:36:06 EDT)
• Chris Neitzert
  • Cox Communications Network/NOC (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 16:46:25 EDT)
• Chris Palmer
  • Re: The Uneducated Enduser (Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT)) (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 13:51:20 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 20:38:33 EDT)
• Chris Ranch
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 o r other vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 18:09:36 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 o r other vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 18:08:29 EDT)
• Christian Malo
  • Re: looking for cisco person in regards to completewhois (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 13:15:52 EDT)
• Christopher J. Wolff
  • RE: remote reboot power strips (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 11:54:31 EDT)
  • remote reboot power strips (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 11:24:29 EDT)
  • Computer room A/C (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 12:57:47 EDT)
  • RE: worm information (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 14:50:00 EDT)
  • RE: worm information (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 14:37:15 EDT)
  • worm information (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 11:35:51 EDT)
• Christopher L. Morrow
  • RE: Juniper failes to change keys (More MD5 fun: Cisco uses wrong MD5key for old session after key change) (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 16:40:06 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 22:18:02 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 13:04:57 EDT)
  • RE: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 02:56:33 EDT)
  • RE: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 01:11:15 EDT)
  • RE: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 00:26:38 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 01:12:03 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 23:51:10 EDT)
  • Re: IOS 12.3(x) Strange service ports open on router (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 18:14:38 EDT)
  • Re: IOS 12.3(x) Strange service ports open on router (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 17:52:40 EDT)
• Cisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team
  • Cisco Security Advisory: Vulnerabilities in SNMP Message Processing (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 18:30:00 EDT)
• Crist Clark
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 13:01:17 EDT)
  • Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 18:09:59 EDT)
  • Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 16:44:58 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 13:52:30 EDT)
  • Re: RFC2549 revisited (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 12:24:33 EST)
• D'Arcy J.M. Cain
  • Re: remote reboot power strips (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 16:25:54 EDT)
• Dan Hollis
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 17:56:38 EDT)
  • Re: Ad blocking with squid (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 15:07:21 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 05:01:56 EDT)
  • Re: Ordering Windows Security Update CD (was Re: Microsoft XP SP2) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 18:18:22 EDT)
  • Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 17:11:02 EDT)
  • Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 15:08:35 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 15:03:32 EDT)
  • Re: Automated Copyright Notice System (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 07:50:56 EDT)
  • Re: google. (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 19:15:52 EDT)
  • Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 16:26:17 EDT)
  • Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 23:32:15 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 23:30:43 EDT)
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 16:44:53 EDT)
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 16:17:53 EDT)
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 15:33:15 EDT)
• Daniel Corbe
  • IPv6 IGP (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 14:29:21 EDT)
• Daniel Golding
  • Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 16:32:14 EDT)
  • Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 10:35:40 EDT)
  • Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 10:32:50 EDT)
• Daniel Karrenberg
  • Check Your Routing Table! 85-88/8 active (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 08:03:58 EDT)
• Daniel Reed
  • Re: Postmaster, hostmaster etc.... (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 08:09:13 EDT)
• Daniel Roesen
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 09:21:13 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 08:38:37 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 07:27:42 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 07:19:51 EDT)
  • Re: Mailserver requirements (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 18:55:09 EDT)
  • Re: Mailserver requirements (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 17:42:28 EDT)
  • Re: NANOG list reverse DNS handling (Sat Apr 03 2004 - 16:52:21 EST)
• Daniel Senie
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 22:07:51 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 11:03:26 EDT)
• Danny McPherson
  • NSP-SEC BOF CFP (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 03:39:53 EDT)
• Darrell Greenwood
  • Re: worm information (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 14:19:19 EDT)
• Dave Howe
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Wed Apr 07 2004 - 08:25:45 EDT)
• David A.Ulevitch
  • Monitoring dark address space? (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 10:06:28 EDT)
• David Barak
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 21:07:07 EDT)
• David Lesher
  • Re: Buying and selling root certificates (Thu Apr 29 2004 - 11:44:11 EDT)
  • Re: Buying and selling root certificates (Thu Apr 29 2004 - 10:22:48 EDT)
  • Re: Buying and selling root certificates (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 22:03:17 EDT)
  • Re: OT: Determining toll free # ownership (Wed Apr 07 2004 - 10:16:09 EDT)
  • Re: RFC2549 revisited (Fri Apr 02 2004 - 00:56:22 EST)
• David Luyer
  • RE: tcp bgp vulnerability looking glass and route server issues. (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 20:10:17 EDT)
  • RE: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 20:06:15 EDT)
  • BGP session reset in one packet [where a looking glass or route server is available] (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 04:38:44 EDT)
  • RE: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 04:15:56 EDT)
  • RE: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 03:08:54 EDT)
  • RE: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 01:49:44 EDT)
  • TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 23:09:31 EDT)
• David Meyer
  • Re: BGP TTL check in 12.3(7)T (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 11:07:01 EDT)
• David Schwartz
  • RE: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 12:57:07 EDT)
• Deepak Jain
  • Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Fri Apr 23 2004 - 13:47:30 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 16:34:34 EDT)
  • Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 15:18:39 EDT)
  • Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 16:38:59 EDT)
  • Re: Any good Wave Boxes to do this? (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 18:54:39 EDT)
  • Any good Wave Boxes to do this? (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 17:05:49 EDT)
• Doug White
  • Re: Spam handling (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 23:54:23 EDT)
  • Re: The Uneducated Enduser (Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT)) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 12:40:34 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 23:03:38 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 21:47:10 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 22:42:28 EDT)
• Dr. Jeffrey Race
  • Re: The Uneducated Enduser (Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT)) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 11:26:19 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 01:14:01 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 23:16:40 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 09:10:32 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 14:59:40 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 14:41:06 EDT)
  • RE: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 17:44:29 EDT)
  • RE: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 15:34:34 EDT)
  • Re: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 14:39:51 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 10:26:10 EDT)
• Drew Linsalata
  • Wide Outage at DSL.net (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 08:35:55 EDT)
• Drew Weaver
  • RE: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 13:42:53 EDT)
• Duane Wessels
  • Re: Ad blocking with squid (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 17:33:18 EDT)
• E.B. Dreger
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 17:59:52 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 17:44:45 EDT)
  • Re: IP economics morphed into (TCP/RST) (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 17:55:05 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 23:10:38 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 12:37:39 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 07:35:03 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 06:56:26 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 06:49:00 EDT)
  • Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 03:26:34 EDT)
  • Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 00:56:18 EDT)
  • Responsibility: user or OS? (Re: Microsoft XP SP2) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 17:21:43 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 14:58:11 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 14:53:20 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 12:28:17 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 12:23:21 EDT)
• Eric A. Hall
  • Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 17:29:55 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 13:20:01 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 16:35:18 EDT)
  • Re: Mail with no purpose? (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 11:12:43 EST)
• Eric Brunner-Williams
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 02:35:29 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 18:39:04 EDT)
• Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
  • Re: Mail with no purpose? (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 11:25:15 EST)
• Eric Krichbaum
  • RE: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 12:53:45 EDT)
  • RE: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 16:05:41 EDT)
• Erik Haagsman
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Wed Apr 07 2004 - 08:51:12 EDT)
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Wed Apr 07 2004 - 08:03:50 EDT)
• Gary E. Miller
  • RE: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 22:48:49 EDT)
  • RE: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 15:40:25 EDT)
• Gary Hale
  • RE: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 16:52:20 EDT)
  • RE: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 14:17:43 EDT)
  • RE: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 08:45:03 EDT)
• Geo.
  • hotmail-msn (Fri Apr 30 2004 - 08:28:32 EDT)
  • RE: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 13:19:00 EDT)
  • Re: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 19:59:51 EDT)
  • Re: Postmaster, hostmaster etc.... (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 22:48:21 EDT)
• George William Herbert
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 22:47:25 EDT)
• German Martinez
  • .mil contact information (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 17:49:06 EST)
• Gordon Cook
  • Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 21:17:43 EDT)
• Grant A. Kirkwood
  • TCP vulnerability (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 13:36:48 EDT)
• Gregh
  • Re: Spam handling (Thu Apr 29 2004 - 00:13:46 EDT)
  • Re: Spam handling (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 23:57:20 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 00:02:21 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 09:22:17 EDT)
• Gregory Hicks
  • Re: hotmail-msn (Fri Apr 30 2004 - 09:19:22 EDT)
• Hank Nussbacher
  • Re: Monitoring dark address space? (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 15:30:58 EDT)
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 15:24:56 EDT)
  • BGP TTL check in 12.3(7)T (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 05:30:38 EDT)
• Henning Brauer
  • Re: Hardware for full mesh bgp (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 22:38:11 EDT)
  • Re: Hardware for full mesh bgp (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 21:22:49 EDT)
  • Re: Hardware for full mesh bgp (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 21:09:41 EDT)
  • Hardware for full mesh bgp (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 20:59:27 EDT)
• Henry Linneweh
  • U.S. Charges 4 Under New Anti-Spam Law (Thu Apr 29 2004 - 09:19:10 EDT)
  • Cisco Rolls Major Patches to TCP Flaw (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 18:55:15 EDT)
  • Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 06:23:23 EDT)
• Henry Yen
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 02:14:54 EDT)
• Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: Buying and selling root certificates (Thu Apr 29 2004 - 03:10:55 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Tue Apr 27 2004 - 03:14:30 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Fri Apr 23 2004 - 06:13:33 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Fri Apr 23 2004 - 05:48:43 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 13:37:04 EDT)
  • Re: IP economics morphed into (TCP/RST) (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 12:03:33 EDT)
  • Re: Vendor TCP oops-es (was Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability) (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 16:09:07 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 15:47:22 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 10:06:25 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 09:09:15 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 08:10:05 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 07:23:54 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 07:00:07 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 04:21:27 EDT)
  • Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 18:37:31 EDT)
  • Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 17:16:37 EDT)
  • Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 05:16:03 EDT)
  • Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 13:06:30 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 12:11:22 EDT)
  • Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 04:32:16 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 12:37:48 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 08:38:59 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 04:52:29 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 16:24:53 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 13:47:16 EDT)
  • Re: Routing issues (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 09:53:15 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 06:19:04 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 03:33:20 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 17:15:15 EDT)
  • Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 04:03:26 EDT)
  • Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 06:22:43 EDT)
  • Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 04:32:33 EDT)
  • Re: IOS 12.3(x) Strange service ports open on router (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 18:17:30 EDT)
  • Re: IOS 12.3(x) Strange service ports open on router (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 17:31:53 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 IGP (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 17:21:43 EDT)
  • Re: BGP TTL check in 12.3(7)T (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 15:45:29 EDT)
  • Re: BGP TTL check in 12.3(7)T (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 13:36:38 EDT)
  • NANOG list reverse DNS handling (Sat Apr 03 2004 - 10:58:21 EST)
  • Re: Mail with no purpose? (Fri Apr 02 2004 - 07:17:54 EST)
• J.D. Falk
  • Re: hotmail issues (Tue Apr 27 2004 - 16:28:07 EDT)
  • Re: hotmail issues (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 16:29:08 EDT)
  • Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 18:23:54 EDT)
• Jack McCarthy
  • Re: worm information (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 14:36:37 EDT)
• James
  • Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 01:50:28 EDT)
  • Re: Alternate and/or hidden infrastructure addresses (BGP/TCP RST/SYN vulnerability) (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 20:58:05 EDT)
  • Re: Alternate and/or hidden infrastructure addresses (BGP/TCP RST/SYN vulnerability) (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 20:54:47 EDT)
  • Re: Alternate and/or hidden infrastructure addresses (BGP/TCP RST/SYN vulnerability) (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 19:24:58 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 16:46:32 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 15:33:14 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 05:43:48 EDT)
  • Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 15:29:20 EDT)
  • Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 14:54:16 EDT)
  • Re: IANA IPv4 allocations and bogon update: 85/8, 86/8, 87/8, 88/8 (Sun Apr 04 2004 - 16:42:27 EDT)
• James Edwards
  • Re: Juniper fails to change keys (More MD5 fun: Cisco uses wrongMD5key for old session after key change) (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 13:52:45 EDT)
  • Re: Ordering Windows Security Update CD (was Re: Microsoft XP SP2) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 03:09:23 EDT)
• Jared Mauch
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 11:30:48 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 10:38:33 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 IGP (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 14:33:51 EDT)
• Jason Dixon
  • Re: Ad blocking with squid (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 16:45:40 EDT)
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 12:49:21 EDT)
• Jason Lixfeld
  • Re: Anyone alive at ALTDB? (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 14:48:31 EDT)
  • Anyone alive at ALTDB? (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 12:55:24 EDT)
• Jay Hennigan
  • RE: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 16:02:28 EDT)
• JC Dill
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 15:16:46 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 11:45:40 EDT)
• Jeff Behl
  • who not ARIN for route registry? (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 18:32:36 EDT)
• Jeff Kell
  • Re: SORBS Insanity (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 00:19:18 EDT)
• Jeff Shultz, WIllamette Valley Internet
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 14:27:14 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 13:39:10 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 12:45:02 EDT)
  • Re: google. (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 19:55:47 EDT)
• Jeff Workman
  • Re: Cisco Rolls Major Patches to TCP Flaw (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 20:59:09 EDT)
  • Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 18:17:11 EDT)
  • Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 17:56:19 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 23:45:20 EDT)
  • Re: worm information (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 13:53:15 EDT)
  • Re: Mailserver requirements (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 20:03:58 EDT)
• Jeremy Kister
  • SORBS Insanity (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 23:09:27 EDT)
• Jerry Eyers
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 14:01:45 EDT)
  • Re: Spam with no purpose? (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:28:31 EST)
• Jesper Skriver
  • Re: he.net or other ipv6 tunnelbroker service? (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 16:44:06 EDT)
• Jim Segrave
  • Re: Mailserver requirements (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 06:15:59 EDT)
• jm
  • OT: Need Network Consultants for Focus Group (Fri Apr 02 2004 - 08:58:20 EST)
• joe
  • Fw: Spam Handling (Thu Apr 29 2004 - 00:52:52 EDT)
  • Re: Spam handling (Thu Apr 29 2004 - 00:30:43 EDT)
  • Re: Spam handling (Thu Apr 29 2004 - 00:14:28 EDT)
  • Spam handling (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 23:31:38 EDT)
• Joe Abley
  • L2TPv3 encaps performance (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 11:05:22 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 00:19:44 EDT)
  • Re: TCP vulnerability (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 18:02:48 EDT)
  • Re: TCP vulnerability (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 14:10:06 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 16:28:15 EDT)
  • SANOG IV, Kathmandu, Nepal, 23-30 July 2004 (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 00:30:20 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone alive at ALTDB? (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 17:58:59 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 11:12:57 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 10:45:38 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 10:07:30 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 09:59:53 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 IGP (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 16:45:49 EDT)
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 11:02:33 EDT)
• Joe Maimon
  • Re: SORBS Insanity (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 09:02:47 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 10:58:55 EDT)
  • Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 18:03:39 EDT)
  • Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 14:45:40 EDT)
• Joe Provo
  • Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 07:58:09 EDT)
• Joe Rhett
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 12:57:57 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 00:58:53 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 23:06:52 EDT)
• Joe Schmoe
  • Providing service for geographically disparate fiber SANs ... Level3 ? (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 23:19:58 EDT)
• Joe St Sauver
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 13:27:34 EDT)
• Joel Jaeggli
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 12:06:23 EDT)
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 14:02:41 EDT)
• John Curran
  • Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 10:53:08 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 23:24:32 EDT)
  • Re: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 17:37:06 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 09:35:48 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 23:52:11 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 22:19:17 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 21:28:08 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 21:11:11 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 19:56:55 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 15:52:47 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 15:07:38 EDT)
• John Kinsella
  • Re: Ad blocking with squid (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 16:44:54 EDT)
• John Kristoff
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 21:51:23 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 21:20:23 EDT)
• John Neiberger
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 13:00:53 EDT)
  • Re: curious (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 11:04:08 EDT)
  • Re: curious (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 10:55:43 EDT)
  • Re: curious (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 10:51:58 EDT)
• John Osmon
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 15:34:37 EDT)
• John Payne
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 11:35:48 EDT)
• Jon R. Kibler
  • OT: Determining toll free # ownership (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 13:04:27 EDT)
• Jonathan M. Slivko
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 13:57:43 EDT)
• Jonathan Nichols
  • Re: Spam with no purpose? (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 13:36:46 EST)
• joshua sahala
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 22:13:39 EDT)
• just me
  • Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 15:45:19 EDT)
  • RE: remote reboot power strips (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 15:43:58 EDT)
• Kevin Oberman
  • Re: New IPv4 Allocations for APNIC (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 14:09:03 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 13:38:45 EDT)
  • Re: New IPv4 Allocations for APNIC (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 13:33:25 EDT)
• Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 02:47:16 EDT)
  • Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 16:31:42 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 06:37:40 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 06:40:08 EDT)
  • Re: Massive stupidity (Was: Re: TCP vulnerability) (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 01:42:43 EDT)
• Lane Patterson
  • Alternate and/or hidden infrastructure addresses (BGP/TCP RST/SYN vulnerability) (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 18:36:07 EDT)
  • RE: tcp bgp vulnerability looking glass and route server issues. (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 19:21:51 EDT)
• Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.
  • Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 15:57:57 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 12:40:00 EDT)
  • Re: curious (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 10:36:34 EDT)
  • Re: Worm Triggers Attacks on File-Trading Services (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 20:20:06 EDT)
  • Re: Spam with no purpose? (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 11:59:12 EST)
• Leo Bicknell
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Fri Apr 23 2004 - 11:15:11 EDT)
• Lincoln Dale
  • Re: Providing service for geographically disparate fiber SANs ... Level3 ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 07:35:22 EDT)
• Lou Katz
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 14:33:25 EDT)
  • Re: OT: Determining toll free # ownership (Wed Apr 07 2004 - 14:03:08 EDT)
• Magnus Eriksson
  • Re: BGP TTL check in 12.3(7)T (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 10:10:54 EDT)
• Malayter, Christopher
  • RE: Juniper failes to change keys (More MD5 fun: Cisco uses wrong MD5key for old session after key change) (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 02:06:13 EDT)
• Mark Jeftovic
  • hotmail issues (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 13:32:18 EDT)
• Martin J. Levy
  • Re: Spam handling (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 23:47:29 EDT)
• Matt Hess
  • Re: Blocking Win95 hosts [WAS: Lazy network operators - NOT] (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 01:28:32 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 23:40:32 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 22:09:04 EDT)
• Matthew Crocker
  • Re: Alternate and/or hidden infrastructure addresses (BGP/TCP RST/SYN vulnerability) (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 19:53:57 EDT)
  • Re: Any good Wave Boxes to do this? (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 18:34:41 EDT)
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 13:14:31 EDT)
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 11:43:17 EDT)
• Matthew Sullivan
  • Re: SORBS Insanity (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 18:30:07 EDT)
  • Re: SORBS Insanity (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 09:19:52 EDT)
  • Re: SORBS Insanity (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 08:30:13 EDT)
  • Re: SORBS Insanity (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 08:21:04 EDT)
• McBurnett, Jim
  • RE: hotmail-msn (Fri Apr 30 2004 - 09:25:32 EDT)
  • RE: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 16:57:53 EDT)
  • RE: Postmaster, hostmaster etc.... (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 11:54:45 EDT)
  • Postmaster, hostmaster etc.... (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 21:41:05 EDT)
• Micah McNelly
  • google. (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 18:08:27 EDT)
• Michael Loftis
  • Re: remote reboot power strips (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 13:06:22 EDT)
• Michael Painter
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 04:10:45 EDT)
• Michael Wiacek
  • Re: .mil contact information (Sat Apr 03 2004 - 16:51:42 EST)
• Michel Py
  • RE: New IPv4 Allocations for APNIC (Thu Apr 29 2004 - 01:40:08 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 22:16:51 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 12:52:19 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 19:02:09 EDT)
  • RE: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 21:29:45 EDT)
  • RE: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 10:46:47 EDT)
  • RE: asymmetric/peer RPF [RE: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think] (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 10:38:50 EDT)
  • RE: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 14:38:09 EDT)
  • RE: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 14:32:07 EDT)
  • RE: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 12:07:39 EDT)
  • RE: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 10:45:46 EDT)
  • RE: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 10:35:27 EDT)
  • RE: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 03:56:17 EDT)
  • RE: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 02:36:08 EDT)
  • RE: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 00:51:06 EDT)
  • RE: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 00:21:08 EDT)
  • RE: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 23:38:07 EDT)
  • RE: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 23:29:34 EDT)
  • RE: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 01:34:55 EDT)
  • RE: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 22:45:46 EDT)
  • RE: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 01:14:21 EDT)
  • RE: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 23:36:52 EDT)
  • RE: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 19:39:44 EDT)
  • RE: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 16:33:41 EDT)
  • RE: Lazy network operators (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 20:42:45 EDT)
  • RE: Lazy network operators (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 22:26:54 EDT)
  • RE: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 21:21:00 EDT)
  • RE: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 13:39:28 EDT)
  • RE: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 10:40:19 EDT)
  • RE: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 00:09:14 EDT)
  • RE: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 23:56:10 EDT)
  • RE: BGP TTL check in 12.3(7)T (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 12:40:06 EDT)
  • RE: Spam with no purpose? (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 01:35:40 EDT)
  • RE: Spam with no purpose? (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 21:59:49 EDT)
  • RE: Spam with no purpose? (Sun Apr 04 2004 - 23:43:23 EDT)
  • RE: IANA IPv4 allocations and bogon update: 85/8, 86/8, 87/8, 88/8 (Sat Apr 03 2004 - 23:07:24 EST)
  • RE: Mail with no purpose? (Fri Apr 02 2004 - 12:25:53 EST)
  • RE: Mail with no purpose? (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 11:49:41 EST)
  • RE: Spam with no purpose? (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 09:35:10 EST)
  • RE: Spam with no purpose? (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 00:51:45 EST)
• Mikael Abrahamsson
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 08:08:32 EDT)
  • snmp vuln (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 05:40:45 EDT)
  • Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 01:23:25 EDT)
  • Re: Any good Wave Boxes to do this? (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 04:55:42 EDT)
• Mike Jezierski - BOFH
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 23:55:33 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 05:06:59 EDT)
• Mike Lewinski
  • Re: google. (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 19:29:33 EDT)
  • Re: NANOG list reverse DNS handling (Sat Apr 03 2004 - 16:02:54 EST)
• Mike Tancsa
  • Teleglobe / Bell Nexxia nexthop problems ? (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 12:55:54 EDT)
  • Point and click tools released for RST/SYN vulnerability (Fri Apr 23 2004 - 09:32:18 EDT)
  • Re: Massive stupidity (Was: Re: TCP vulnerability) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 21:23:46 EDT)
  • TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 13:36:09 EDT)
• Mike Walter
  • RE: Mailserver requirements (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 17:18:28 EDT)
• Miquel van Smoorenburg
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 05:50:38 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 04:09:39 EDT)
  • Re: TISCALI (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 05:25:30 EDT)
• Nick Feamster
  • Re: Routing issues (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 13:04:51 EDT)
• Nicole
  • Postfix errors from some new worm?? (Thu Apr 29 2004 - 20:18:44 EDT)
  • Anyone else having resend/timout issues with Yahoo mail accounts? (Tue Apr 27 2004 - 18:35:03 EDT)
  • Can someone at Hotmail Mail/Spam contact me off list please (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 15:08:28 EDT)
• Niels Bakker
  • Re: Alternate and/or hidden infrastructure addresses (BGP/TCP RST/SYN vulnerability) (Fri Apr 23 2004 - 12:19:17 EDT)
  • Re: IP economics morphed into (TCP/RST) (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 10:42:02 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 12:44:05 EDT)
  • Re: Postmaster, hostmaster etc.... (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 17:53:58 EDT)
  • Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 17:23:16 EDT)
  • Re: IOS 12.3(x) Strange service ports open on router (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 18:35:46 EDT)
  • Re: IOS 12.3(x) Strange service ports open on router (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 18:31:25 EDT)
  • Re: IOS 12.3(x) Strange service ports open on router (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 18:03:50 EDT)
  • Re: Mailserver requirements (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 19:48:59 EDT)
  • Re: Mailserver requirements (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 17:09:45 EDT)
• Owen DeLong
  • Re: New IPv4 Allocations for APNIC (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 15:22:03 EDT)
  • Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 14:58:13 EDT)
  • Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 13:25:52 EDT)
• Padliya, Deepak
  • CW Routing Registry source change to SAVVIS. (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 16:56:52 EDT)
• Patrick W.Gilmore
  • Re: Alternate and/or hidden infrastructure addresses (BGP/TCP RST/SYN vulnerability) (Fri Apr 23 2004 - 09:09:57 EDT)
  • Re: Alternate and/or hidden infrastructure addresses (BGP/TCP RST/SYN vulnerability) (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 19:28:58 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Fri Apr 23 2004 - 00:16:13 EDT)
  • Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 15:46:38 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 11:11:57 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 10:19:10 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 01:21:52 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 00:32:40 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 23:40:25 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 23:49:21 EDT)
  • Re: Massive stupidity (Was: Re: TCP vulnerability) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 21:37:18 EDT)
  • Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 19:24:37 EDT)
  • Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 15:40:38 EDT)
  • Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 15:38:28 EDT)
  • Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 15:10:07 EDT)
  • Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 11:52:16 EDT)
  • Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 00:03:43 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 12:37:05 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 12:26:14 EDT)
  • Blocking Win95 hosts [WAS: Lazy network operators - NOT] (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 00:03:29 EDT)
  • Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 00:25:07 EDT)
  • Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 06:16:58 EDT)
  • Delayed mail [WAS: Packet anonymity is the problem?] (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 21:07:16 EDT)
  • Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 08:40:58 EDT)
  • Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 20:11:03 EDT)
  • Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 00:11:25 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 18:54:50 EDT)
• Paul Jakma
  • Re: Juniper failes to change keys (More MD5 fun: Cisco uses wrong MD5 key for old session after key change) (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 00:13:17 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Fri Apr 23 2004 - 18:04:55 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 16:00:55 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 15:17:09 EDT)
  • Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 15:14:03 EDT)
  • Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 17:25:17 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 17:15:06 EDT)
  • Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 12:41:22 EDT)
  • RE: Lazy network operators (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 22:48:55 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 19:10:06 EDT)
  • RE: Spam with no purpose? (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 01:45:54 EDT)
  • RE: Spam with no purpose? (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 00:30:18 EDT)
  • RE: Spam with no purpose? (Fri Apr 02 2004 - 19:00:58 EST)
• Paul Jasa
  • RE: Mexico City Internet Bandwidth suggestions (Fri Apr 30 2004 - 09:47:46 EDT)
  • Mexico City Internet Bandwidth suggestions (Thu Apr 29 2004 - 19:40:19 EDT)
• Paul Khavkine
  • Re: Ad blocking with squid (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 17:39:23 EDT)
  • Re: Ad blocking with squid (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 16:55:32 EDT)
  • Ad blocking with squid (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 16:33:49 EDT)
• Paul Vixie
  • Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 18:21:54 EDT)
  • Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 01:15:48 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 18:16:58 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 18:03:57 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 17:41:54 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 10:07:43 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 20:46:40 EDT)
  • flat ascii, please (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 19:16:24 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 12:33:18 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 11:05:40 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 10:55:04 EDT)
  • Re: Monitoring dark address space? (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 02:32:59 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 02:13:35 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 01:44:38 EDT)
  • Re: Monitoring dark address space? (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 00:06:18 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 11:45:58 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 11:13:37 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 02:47:35 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 20:45:13 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 00:10:39 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 00:08:53 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 00:04:58 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 02:04:04 EDT)
  • Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 01:43:32 EDT)
  • Re: abuse standards & consumer reports (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 14:01:27 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 11:44:44 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 23:41:48 EDT)
  • Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 23:36:44 EDT)
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 01:36:42 EDT)
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 15:05:36 EDT)
• Peering
  • RE: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 12:15:39 EDT)
  • RE: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 11:28:24 EDT)
  • RE: Xspedius / E.Spire as wellRe: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (fwd) (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 11:14:55 EDT)
• Pekka Savola
  • Re: New IPv4 Allocations for APNIC (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 15:35:38 EDT)
  • Re: New IPv4 Allocations for APNIC (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 13:42:52 EDT)
  • Re: Alternate and/or hidden infrastructure addresses (BGP/TCP RST/SYN vulnerability) (Fri Apr 23 2004 - 04:07:05 EDT)
  • asymmetric/peer RPF [RE: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think] (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 00:51:36 EDT)
  • Alternatives to MD5 [Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability] (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 02:25:14 EDT)
  • Re: TCP Vulnerability makes case for authenticated BGP (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 14:09:15 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 03:42:18 EDT)
  • Re: IOS 12.3(x) Strange service ports open on router (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 16:27:17 EDT)
  • Re: BGP TTL check in 12.3(7)T (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 16:29:56 EDT)
  • RE: BGP TTL check in 12.3(7)T (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 12:33:37 EDT)
• Pete Kruckenberg
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 13:42:39 EDT)
• Pete Templin
  • Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 07:49:23 EDT)
• Peter Galbavy
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 03:25:39 EDT)
  • Re: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 15:40:47 EDT)
  • Re: Mailserver requirements (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 10:12:44 EDT)
• Petri Helenius
  • Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 orother vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 13:06:45 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 08:46:29 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Fri Apr 23 2004 - 11:45:31 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 02:48:24 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 01:50:34 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 10:53:24 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 06:11:13 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 13:42:55 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 12:18:58 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 14:59:33 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 10:18:49 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 05:50:42 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 05:17:47 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 02:35:56 EDT)
  • Re: Packet anonymity is the problem? (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 14:28:24 EDT)
  • Re: IOS 12.3(x) Strange service ports open on router (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 15:20:23 EDT)
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Wed Apr 07 2004 - 01:36:51 EDT)
  • Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions? (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 16:38:32 EDT)
• Priscilla Oppenheimer
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Tue Apr 27 2004 - 12:24:07 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 23:03:06 EDT)
• Rafi Sadowsky
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 orother vendor ? (Tue Apr 27 2004 - 23:56:41 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 orother vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 00:37:36 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 orother vendor ? (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 15:24:37 EDT)
• Randy Bush
  • Re: Buying and selling root certificates (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 21:44:29 EDT)
  • Re: Hardware for full mesh bgp (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 23:03:01 EDT)
  • Re: Hardware for full mesh bgp (Sun Apr 25 2004 - 22:16:03 EDT)
  • Re: TCP vulnerability (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 17:37:00 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 03:25:00 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 23:54:59 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 20:02:52 EDT)
  • Re: curious (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 18:49:10 EDT)
  • Re: IANA IPv4 allocations and bogon update: 85/8, 86/8, 87/8, 88/8 (Sun Apr 04 2004 - 16:50:37 EDT)
  • Re: Spam with no purpose? (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 10:45:48 EST)
  • Re: Spam with no purpose? (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 10:03:35 EST)
• ravi pina
  • Re: worm information (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 14:43:37 EDT)
  • Re: worm information (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 14:30:29 EDT)
• Raymond Dijkxhoorn
  • Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 18:34:52 EDT)
  • Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 17:49:36 EDT)
• Richard A Steenbergen
  • Re: Xspedius / E.Spire as wellRe: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 17:48:29 EDT)
  • Massive stupidity (Was: Re: TCP vulnerability) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 17:09:16 EDT)
• Richard Cox
  • Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 16:05:22 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 15:39:00 EDT)
  • Re: Mail with no purpose? (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 12:08:00 EST)
  • Re: Mail with no purpose? (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 10:23:46 EST)
• Richard Irving
  • Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Fri Apr 23 2004 - 13:56:16 EDT)
• Richard Welty
  • Re: Mailserver requirements (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 21:16:45 EDT)
  • Re: Mailserver requirements (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 17:48:19 EDT)
• Rik van Riel
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 13:41:51 EDT)
• Rob Nelson
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 18:39:36 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 11:26:13 EDT)
• Rob Thomas
  • IANA IPv4 allocations and bogon update: 58/8, 59/8 (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 18:04:11 EDT)
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 00:17:19 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 00:11:28 EDT)
  • RE: IANA IPv4 allocations and bogon update: 85/8, 86/8, 87/8, 88/8 (Sat Apr 03 2004 - 23:15:39 EST)
  • IANA IPv4 allocations and bogon update: 85/8, 86/8, 87/8, 88/8 (Fri Apr 02 2004 - 17:19:13 EST)
• Robert Blayzor
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 13:01:28 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 12:31:59 EDT)
  • Re: IOS 12.3(x) Strange service ports open on router (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 15:38:19 EDT)
  • IOS 12.3(x) Strange service ports open on router (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 14:53:16 EDT)
• Robert Boyle
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 15:44:01 EDT)
• Robert E. Seastrom
  • Re: Buying and selling root certificates (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 20:19:00 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 orother vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 23:21:17 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 orother vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 18:52:17 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 orother vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 08:24:20 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 07:44:23 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 11:36:41 EDT)
  • Re: SPAM Directly from AT&T Data Networking (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 17:11:28 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone alive at ALTDB? (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 14:47:52 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 08:11:12 EDT)
• Robert M. Enger
  • Re: Buying and selling root certificates (Thu Apr 29 2004 - 06:04:40 EDT)
• Robert Mathews
  • Doesn't appear to be a 'foolish' item.. (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:55:35 EST)
• Rodney Dunn
  • Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 16:57:03 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 15:17:31 EDT)
• Rodney Joffe
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 14:41:57 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 13:22:56 EDT)
  • Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 01:01:52 EDT)
  • Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 17:42:07 EDT)
  • Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 16:44:44 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 21:16:42 EDT)
• Roland Perry
  • Re: Postmaster, hostmaster etc.... (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 12:15:35 EDT)
• Roman Volf
  • Re: Mailserver requirements (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 17:25:15 EDT)
• Roy
  • RE: remote reboot power strips (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 13:10:57 EDT)
• Rubens Kuhl Jr.
  • Re: Routing issues (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 09:59:49 EDT)
• Saku Ytti
  • Re: snmp vuln (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 03:17:06 EDT)
• Scott Call
  • Re: Postfix errors from some new worm?? (Thu Apr 29 2004 - 20:55:34 EDT)
  • Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 01:15:49 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 00:20:44 EDT)
  • RE: Spam with no purpose? (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 22:15:03 EDT)
• Scott Francis
  • Re: Buying and selling root certificates (Thu Apr 29 2004 - 01:21:08 EDT)
• Scott McGrath
  • Re: The Uneducated Enduser (Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT)) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 13:13:36 EDT)
• Scott Stursa
  • Re: curious (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 11:18:27 EDT)
  • curious (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 10:26:15 EDT)
• Scott Weeks
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 23:53:45 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 23:07:45 EDT)
  • Re: The spyware that loved me (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 15:11:55 EDT)
• Sean Donelan
  • THe Internet is Too Secure Already (was Re: Buying and selling root certificates) (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 23:19:48 EDT)
  • Buying and selling root certificates (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 19:59:31 EDT)
  • Deadline Apr 27: Extending CALEA to IP-Enabled services (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 04:16:06 EDT)
  • Re: Juniper failes to change keys (More MD5 fun: Cisco uses wrong MD5key for old session after key change) (Sat Apr 24 2004 - 17:32:16 EDT)
  • Juniper failes to change keys (More MD5 fun: Cisco uses wrong MD5 key for old session after key change) (Sat Apr 24 2004 - 16:40:13 EDT)
  • Re: Massive stupidity (Was: Re: TCP vulnerability) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 17:45:00 EDT)
  • Re: Ordering Windows Security Update CD (was Re: Microsoft XP SP2) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 03:12:26 EDT)
  • Ordering Windows Security Update CD (was Re: Microsoft XP SP2) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 02:06:41 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 18:37:43 EDT)
  • Automated Copyright Notice System (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 07:29:37 EDT)
  • Fingerprints (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 03:29:50 EDT)
  • Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 23:16:36 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 22:39:49 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 20:03:04 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 02:56:45 EDT)
  • Gambling on power: Learning lessons (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 16:41:23 EDT)
  • Cr/Hackers Strike Advanced Computing Networks (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 18:59:02 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 16:32:53 EDT)
  • Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 15:53:20 EDT)
  • Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 18:55:12 EDT)
  • TTY phone fraud and abuse (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 00:31:15 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 22:56:05 EDT)
  • Packet anonymity is the problem? (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 22:48:16 EDT)
  • Worm Triggers Attacks on File-Trading Services (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 20:13:01 EDT)
  • The spyware that loved me (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 05:16:09 EDT)
  • Re: OT: Determining toll free # ownership (Wed Apr 07 2004 - 15:22:42 EDT)
  • NSA wiretap leads to arrest (Tue Apr 06 2004 - 15:29:47 EDT)
  • Falsifying business records (Fri Apr 02 2004 - 05:30:51 EST)
• Shazad
  • TISCALI (Wed Apr 07 2004 - 10:24:43 EDT)
  • TISCALI (Wed Apr 07 2004 - 08:46:00 EDT)
  • TISCALI (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 12:31:13 EDT)
• Simon Brilus
  • Routing issues (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 08:58:20 EDT)
• Simon Leinen
  • Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 07:29:28 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 IGP (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 17:27:58 EDT)
• Simon Lockhart
  • Re: More MD5 fun: Cisco uses wrong MD5 key for old session after key change (Sat Apr 24 2004 - 16:25:46 EDT)
  • Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 15:00:33 EDT)
  • Re: SMTP behavior: 553 5.5.2 Bad command format(h) (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 18:23:53 EST)
• Smith, Donald
  • RE: tcp bgp vulnerability looking glass and route server issues. (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 02:53:25 EDT)
• Stephen J. Wilcox
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 orother vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 05:31:32 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 orother vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 19:02:08 EDT)
  • Re: Alternate and/or hidden infrastructure addresses (BGP/TCP RST/SYN vulnerability) (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 20:12:30 EDT)
  • RE: IP economics morphed into (TCP/RST) (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 11:55:13 EDT)
  • Re: IP economics morphed into (TCP/RST) (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 11:07:38 EDT)
  • RE: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 10:18:40 EDT)
  • Re: IP economics morphed into (TCP/RST) (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 10:11:06 EDT)
  • Re: TCP RST attack (the cause of all that MD5-o-rama) (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 15:24:02 EDT)
  • Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 14:15:37 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 18:00:55 EDT)
  • RE: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 11:42:56 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 11:14:26 EDT)
  • RE: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 09:58:59 EDT)
  • RE: Lazy network operators (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 05:01:51 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 15:39:46 EDT)
  • Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 19:05:31 EDT)
  • Re: Postmaster, hostmaster etc.... (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 19:00:55 EDT)
  • Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 16:03:38 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 15:27:28 EDT)
  • Weird virus activity from AOL user(s) (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 16:57:06 EDT)
  • Is your domain licensed? (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 05:48:55 EST)
• Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: Buying and selling root certificates (Thu Apr 29 2004 - 18:41:15 EDT)
  • Re: Buying and selling root certificates (Thu Apr 29 2004 - 01:02:44 EDT)
  • Re: TTY phone fraud and abuse (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 23:06:36 EDT)
• Stephen Stuart
  • Re: TCP vulnerability (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 18:17:50 EDT)
• Steve Atkins
  • Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 17:47:10 EDT)
  • Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 17:34:04 EDT)
• Steve Conte
  • New IPv4 Allocations for APNIC (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 13:17:23 EDT)
  • New IPv4 Allocations to the RIPE NCC (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 16:59:33 EST)
• Steve Gibbard
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 15:42:31 EDT)
• Steve Linford
  • Re: Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 18:21:10 EDT)
  • Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers) (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 18:16:19 EDT)
  • Re: CW Routing Registry source change to SAVVIS. (Wed Apr 07 2004 - 09:14:11 EDT)
• Steve Rubin
  • Re: Anyone alive at ALTDB? (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 20:32:26 EDT)
• Steven Champeon
  • Re: Lazy network operators - NOT (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 14:15:33 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 14:50:17 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 12:50:18 EDT)
• Steven M. Bellovin
  • Re: Buying and selling root certificates (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 21:05:28 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 23:11:00 EDT)
  • Re: Lazy network operators (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 20:36:44 EDT)</