RE: Spam with no purpose?

From: Todd Vierling (no email)
Date: Mon Apr 05 2004 - 22:51:24 EDT


On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Scott Call wrote:

: Kinda of makes you wonder if AP and the like could go after spammers
: habeaus style on copyright infringement. Since the spam is a source of
: revenue, it could be construed as criminal copyright infringement as well
: as civil....

AP will face the same problem as Habeas: tracing the spam backwards through
the open proxies and China hosting to get information about the real source.

RFG ran a honeypot open proxy network that collected information about
allegedly "real" proxy-rape spam sources, but he was DDoS'd to death by such
people, and then gave up on the effort [publicly? who knows?].

-- 
-- Todd Vierling <> <>







Hosted Email Solutions

Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD