Nanog 0402
By Thread

Most recent messages
994 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
About this archive
Other mail archives

Starting: Sun Feb 01 2004 - 02:12:07 EST
Ending: Sun Feb 29 2004 - 21:34:31 EST

• www.sco.com no longer has an DNS A record Sean Donelan (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 02:10:27 EST)
  • Re: www.sco.com no longer has an DNS A record Adam 'Starblazer' Romberg (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 02:36:59 EST)
  • Re: www.sco.com no longer has an DNS A record Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 05:39:35 EST)
  • Re: www.sco.com no longer has an DNS A record Stephen J. Wilcox (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 05:50:44 EST)
• Re: SCO blames ISPs for blocking access to web site Petri Helenius (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 07:03:42 EST)
  • Re: SCO blames ISPs for blocking access to web site Stephen J. Wilcox (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 08:04:59 EST)
    • Re: SCO blames ISPs for blocking access to web site Alexei Roudnev (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 00:34:38 EST)
• Re: AOL web troubles.. New AOL speedup seems to be a slowdown Brian Bruns (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 09:01:20 EST)
  • Re: AOL web troubles.. New AOL speedup seems to be a slowdown The Gunn (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 08:40:45 EST)
    • Re: www.sco.com no longer has an DNS A record Sean Donelan (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 02:55:09 EST)
    • Re: www.sco.com no longer has an DNS A record W.D.McKinney (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 03:40:39 EST)
    • Re: www.sco.com no longer has an DNS A record Christopher L. Morrow (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 03:34:35 EST)
    • Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block access to SCO? Randy Bush (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 17:58:45 EST)
    • Re: SCO (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 19:36:04 EST)
    • Re: updated root hints file (fwd) Randy Bush (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 20:50:24 EST)
    • Re: What happened to dot pro... (BTW) (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 22:55:36 EST)
    • Re: What happened to dot pro... (BTW) John R Levine (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 23:49:38 EST)
    • Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello skynet.be ?) Todd Vierling (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 13:40:28 EST)
    • Re: Need abuse contact for Yahoo Hostinng Christopher X. Candreva (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 15:34:45 EST)
      • Re: Need abuse contact for Yahoo Hostinng Christopher X. Candreva (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 15:44:55 EST)
    • Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Daniel Senie (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 11:32:30 EST)
    • Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? JC Dill (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 13:10:43 EST)
    • Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Matthew Sullivan (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 00:59:40 EST)
    • Re: CULPRIT - poor connectivity to new b.root-servers.net John Payne (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 13:37:00 EST)
    • Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 Christopher L. Morrow (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 12:15:26 EST)
    • Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 Crist Clark (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 14:01:49 EST)
      • Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 Alexei Roudnev (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 14:29:28 EST)
    • Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 Scott McGrath (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 14:32:49 EST)
    • Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 Randy Bush (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 15:33:30 EST)
    • Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 (no name) (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 16:24:52 EST)
    • Re: updated root hints file (fwd) Doug Barton (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 17:16:20 EST)
    • Re: Stopping open proxies and open relays Robert Boyle (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 00:15:11 EST)
    • Re: Stopping open proxies and open relays (no name) (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 01:22:42 EST)
    • Re: Stopping open proxies and open relays Matthew Sullivan (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 09:47:30 EST)
    • Re: question on ptr rr Randy Bush (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 11:08:09 EST)
    • Re: question on ptr rr Randy Bush (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 12:06:38 EST)
    • Re: question on ptr rr Randy Bush (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 13:43:58 EST)
    • Re: Stopping open proxies and open relays (no name) (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 14:45:06 EST)
    • Re: question on ptr rr Sean Donelan (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 15:10:10 EST)
    • Re: question on ptr rr Randy Bush (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 11:50:44 EST)
    • Re: question on ptr rr Andrew - Supernews (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 16:01:20 EST)
      • Re: question on ptr rr (no email) (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 16:45:09 EST)
    • Re: Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. Sean Donelan (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 17:21:34 EST)
    • Re: question on ptr rr Andrew - Supernews (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 17:44:15 EST)
    • Re: Dumb users spread viruses Sean Donelan (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 20:59:54 EST)
    • Re: Dumb users spread viruses Charles Sprickman (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 21:29:18 EST)
    • Re: question on ptr rr (no name) (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 00:26:55 EST)
    • Re: Dumb users spread viruses Todd Vierling (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 01:14:15 EST)
    • Re: Dumb users spread viruses John Payne (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 09:00:55 EST)
    • Re: question on ptr rr Daniel Senie (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 11:49:33 EST)
    • Re: Dumb users spread viruses JC Dill (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 12:24:13 EST)
      • Re: Dumb users spread viruses Mike Jezierski - BOFH (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 13:12:50 EST)
      • Re: Dumb users spread viruses Robert Boyle (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 13:17:20 EST)
    • Re: Network and security experts (was Re: Dumb users spread viruses) (no name) (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 13:31:37 EST)
    • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls technologists "biased" Chris Yarnell (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 18:56:19 EST)
    • Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and their regions. George Michaelson (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 20:59:22 EST)
    • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls (no name) (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 00:03:44 EST)
    • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Michael Loftis (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 00:28:36 EST)
    • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Scott Savage (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 01:02:07 EST)
      • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Brian Bruns (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 09:34:30 EST)
    • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls JC Dill (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 02:07:10 EST)
    • RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Randy Bush (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 09:51:51 EST)
    • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls JC Dill (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 10:11:45 EST)
    • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Michael Loftis (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 11:24:04 EST)
      • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Marshall Eubanks (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 11:42:13 EST)
      • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Marshall Eubanks (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 11:44:30 EST)
    • Re: question on ptr rr Randy Bush (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 12:28:03 EST)
    • Re: question on ptr rr Randy Bush (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 22:05:33 EST)
    • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Dave Crocker (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 14:15:20 EST)
    • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Alex Bligh (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 14:20:44 EST)
    • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers (no name) (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 14:26:57 EST)
    • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Sean Donelan (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 15:13:30 EST)
    • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers (no name) (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 15:23:18 EST)
    • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Sean Donelan (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 15:36:29 EST)
    • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Daniel Senie (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 15:49:17 EST)
    • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Sean Donelan (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 16:30:56 EST)
    • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Alex Bligh (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 18:31:55 EST)
      • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Sean Donelan (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 19:45:18 EST)
    • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Alex Bligh (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 20:06:11 EST)
    • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls JC Dill (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 11:23:47 EST)
    • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Alex Bligh (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 17:44:50 EST)
      • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers (no name) (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 18:13:39 EST)
    • Re: Interesting BIND error Vinny Abello (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 17:47:15 EST)
    • Re: Interesting BIND error Matthew Sullivan (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 17:55:14 EST)
    • Re: Interesting BIND error Crist Clark (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 17:59:40 EST)
    • Re: Interesting BIND error (no name) (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 18:15:17 EST)
    • Re: Interesting BIND error (no name) (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 22:29:42 EST)
    • Re: Interesting BIND error Matthew Sullivan (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 01:01:06 EST)
    • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Dave Crocker (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 01:58:18 EST)
    • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Alex Bligh (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 04:46:59 EST)
    • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Rob Pickering (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 10:59:06 EST)
      • Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse Sean Donelan (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 17:33:58 EST)
      • Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse Henry Linneweh (Mon Feb 16 2004 - 13:15:02 EST)
      • RE: Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse Roy (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 14:44:37 EST)
      • Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse (no name) (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 15:09:36 EST)
      • RE: Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse Nicole (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 15:24:39 EST)
      • Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse william(at)elan.net (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 16:27:07 EST)
      • Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse John Palmer (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 15:43:32 EST)
      • Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse JC Dill (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 21:02:43 EST)
      • RE: Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse Roy (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 15:31:48 EST)
      • Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse (no name) (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 05:56:11 EST)
    • Cisco Secure ACS Solution Engine-a 1-RU Mr. James W. Laferriere (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 16:26:58 EST)
    • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Sean Donelan (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 16:40:40 EST)
    • Re: Anti-spam System Idea (no name) (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 17:27:29 EST)
    • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Sean Donelan (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 17:46:05 EST)
    • Re: Anti-spam System Idea (no name) (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 17:53:11 EST)
    • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Jon R. Kibler (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 18:30:15 EST)
    • Identifying IP address types Sean Donelan (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 19:06:13 EST)
      • Re: Identifying IP address types (no name) (Mon Feb 16 2004 - 06:20:38 EST)
    • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Sean Donelan (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 19:19:56 EST)
    • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Jon R. Kibler (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 20:18:43 EST)
    • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Christopher L. Morrow (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 20:59:51 EST)
    • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Sean Donelan (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 21:29:38 EST)
    • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Tim Wilde (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 22:32:59 EST)
    • Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse Daniel Reed (Mon Feb 16 2004 - 10:23:45 EST)
    • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Daniel Reed (Mon Feb 16 2004 - 10:25:23 EST)
    • Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse Sean Donelan (Mon Feb 16 2004 - 12:58:30 EST)
    • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Jon R. Kibler (Mon Feb 16 2004 - 14:11:50 EST)
    • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Christopher L. Morrow (Mon Feb 16 2004 - 14:52:34 EST)
    • Re: Anti-spam System Idea J Bacher (Mon Feb 16 2004 - 15:05:51 EST)
    • Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse Daniel Reed (Mon Feb 16 2004 - 16:22:47 EST)
    • Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse Mark Turpin (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 12:56:28 EST)
    • Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse Daniel Reed (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 14:02:18 EST)
    • Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse Mark Turpin (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 15:17:26 EST)
    • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Randy Bush (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 16:05:02 EST)
    • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Randy Bush (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:21:53 EST)
    • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Dave Crocker (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 18:07:51 EST)
      • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Guðbjörn S. Hreinsson (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 19:36:03 EST)
      • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Dave Crocker (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 20:07:28 EST)
      • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Guðbjörn S. Hreinsson (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 20:34:40 EST)
    • Re: Anycast and windows servers Sean Donelan (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 05:43:52 EST)
    • Re: Anycast and windows servers Alex Bligh (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 07:31:57 EST)
    • Re: Anycast and windows servers Robert Boyle (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 08:33:49 EST)
    • Re: Anycast and windows servers Daniel Senie (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 09:38:51 EST)
    • Re: eBGP, iBGP, injecting networks Vinny Abello (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 18:51:15 EST)
    • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls technologists "biased" (no name) (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 11:47:54 EST)
    • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls technologists "biased" David A. Ulevitch (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 12:31:18 EST)
    • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls (no name) (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 10:38:45 EST)
    • Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events (nothing to see, move along) Sean Donelan (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 11:58:02 EST)
      • Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events (nothing to see, move along) Niels Bakker (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 13:52:32 EST)
      • Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events (nothing to see, move along) Pete Templin (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 09:09:36 EST)
      • Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events (nothing to see, move along) Stephen J. Wilcox (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 10:15:53 EST)
      • Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events (nothing to see, move along) Pete Templin (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 10:17:30 EST)
    • Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events (nothing to see, move along) Alex Rubenstein (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 12:13:01 EST)
      • Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events (nothing to see, move along) Colin Neeson (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 18:45:14 EST)
    • Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Randy Bush (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 18:04:59 EST)
    • Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Randy Bush (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 18:39:10 EST)
    • Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Hank Nussbacher (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 00:20:50 EST)
    • Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Randy Bush (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 00:54:50 EST)
    • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Dave Stewart (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 13:11:03 EST)
    • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Jeff S Wheeler (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 14:05:38 EST)
      • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Matthew Crocker (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 14:32:23 EST)
    • How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Steve Gibbard (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 19:30:15 EST)
      • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) joshua sahala (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 20:35:17 EST)
      • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Eric Kuhnke (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 06:13:23 EST)
      • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Crist Clark (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 12:43:06 EST)
    • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) (no email) (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 00:52:08 EST)
    • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) (no name) (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 11:52:03 EST)
    • Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder) Jay Hennigan (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:12:45 EST)
    • RE: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder) Randy Bush (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 21:58:04 EST)
    • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Alex Bligh (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 09:07:18 EST)
      • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Paul Jakma (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 09:52:16 EST)
    • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Alex Bligh (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 10:15:10 EST)
      • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Paul Jakma (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 21:50:44 EST)
    • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) (no name) (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:54:11 EST)
    • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) (no name) (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:33:02 EST)
    • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Jeff Shultz (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:49:52 EST)
      • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Adam Rothschild (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 03:21:11 EST)
    • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Daniel Senie (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:43:50 EST)
    • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Daniel Senie (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 08:54:00 EST)
    • Re: Possibly yet another MS mail worm Todd Vierling (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 15:59:11 EST)
      • Re: Possibly yet another MS mail worm Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 19:45:46 EST)
      • Re: Possibly yet another MS mail worm Michael Wiacek (Sun Feb 29 2004 - 21:16:59 EST)
      • Re: Possibly yet another MS mail worm Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Sun Feb 29 2004 - 21:32:17 EST)
  • Re: AOL web troubles.. New AOL speedup seems to be a slowdown Robert E. Seastrom (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 13:35:30 EST)
• Re: updated root hints file (fwd) Bruce Campbell (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 09:58:16 EST)
  • Re: updated root hints file (fwd) Stephen J. Wilcox (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 10:51:48 EST)
  • Re: updated root hints file (fwd) bill (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 20:29:04 EST)
  • Re: updated root hints file (fwd) bill (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 21:12:45 EST)
• Re: Verizon mail troubles David Lesher (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 10:08:05 EST)
• Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block access to SCO? Sean Donelan (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 15:52:39 EST)
  • Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block access to SCO? James Edwards (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 16:20:33 EST)
    • Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block access to SCO? Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 17:00:40 EST)
      • Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block access to SCO? (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 18:09:55 EST)
      • Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block access to SCO? Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 18:24:07 EST)
      • Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block access to SCO? Stephen J. Wilcox (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 19:48:19 EST)
      • Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block access to SCO? Jess Kitchen (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 20:57:35 EST)
  • Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block access to SCO? Thomas Seyrat (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 16:55:47 EST)
  • Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block access to SCO? Mike Tancsa (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 17:33:29 EST)
  • Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block access to SCO? Petri Helenius (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 17:36:34 EST)
  • Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block access to SCO? (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 18:08:11 EST)
  • Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block access to SCO? Petri Helenius (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 18:19:48 EST)
  • RE: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block access to SCO? CHUNIKHIN Igor FTLD (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 19:26:27 EST)
  • Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block access to SCO? Miquel van Smoorenburg (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 07:59:20 EST)
• Re: SCO Petri Helenius (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 18:37:26 EST)
• Re: Impending (mydoom) DOS attack E.B. Dreger (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 19:26:06 EST)
• What happened to dot pro ? John R Levine (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 20:08:57 EST)
• Re: MS is vulnerable E.B. Dreger (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 20:13:53 EST)
  • Re: MS is vulnerable Scott Francis (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 14:17:16 EST)
• Re: Outbound Route Optimization E.B. Dreger (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 20:39:57 EST)
• Re: What happened to dot pro... (BTW) J. Oquendo (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 21:16:52 EST)
  • Re: What happened to dot pro... (BTW) John R Levine (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 21:48:47 EST)
  • Re: What happened to dot pro... (BTW) Bradley Dunn (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 23:05:14 EST)
• other virus damages/costs.....(hello skynet.be ?) Mike Tancsa (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 07:57:07 EST)
  • Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello skynet.be ?) Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 08:08:37 EST)
  • Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello skynet.be ?) (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 08:42:53 EST)
    • Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello skynet.be ?) (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:02:01 EST)
    • Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello skynet.be ?) Matthew Sullivan (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:25:42 EST)
  • Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello skynet.be ?) (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 08:56:36 EST)
  • Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello skynet.be ?) Randy Bush (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 11:12:00 EST)
• Need abuse contact for Yahoo Hostinng Christopher X. Candreva (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 12:36:06 EST)
• Unbelievable Spam. Ejay Hire (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:01:19 EST)
  • Re: Unbelievable Spam. Jeff Shultz (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:20:51 EST)
  • Re: Unbelievable Spam. Richard Welty (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:31:51 EST)
  • Re: Unbelievable Spam. Roland Perry (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:36:45 EST)
  • Re: Unbelievable Spam. Paul Vixie (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:42:03 EST)
  • Re: Unbelievable Spam. Vadim Antonov (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 17:40:10 EST)
  • Re: Unbelievable Spam. Brian Bruns (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 17:58:47 EST)
  • Re: Unbelievable Spam. Bill Thompson (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 18:23:09 EST)
  • Re: Unbelievable Spam. Vadim Antonov (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 19:28:12 EST)
  • Re: Unbelievable Spam. (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 05:31:00 EST)
    • Re: Unbelievable Spam. Alexei Roudnev (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:49:33 EST)
    • Re: Unbelievable Spam. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 01:23:36 EST)
  • Re: Unbelievable Spam. vijay gill (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:56:55 EST)
  • Re: Unbelievable Spam. Alexander Bochmann (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 11:47:40 EST)
  • Re: Unbelievable Spam. Tom (UnitedLayer) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:31:28 EST)
    • Re: Unbelievable Spam. (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:47:25 EST)
• Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Brian (nanog-list) (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 18:01:56 EST)
  • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Jonas Frey (Probe Networks) (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 18:20:26 EST)
    • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Matthew Crocker (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 18:40:52 EST)
  • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Matthew Crocker (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 18:25:10 EST)
    • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 21:07:30 EST)
      • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Pekka Savola (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 00:58:46 EST)
  • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Bob Snyder (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 20:41:45 EST)
  • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Vincent Gillet - Opentransit (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 05:05:57 EST)
  • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 05:47:52 EST)
    • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Iljitsch van Beijnum (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 18:03:32 EST)
  • RE: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Terry Baranski (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 09:15:13 EST)
    • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses bill (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 09:28:55 EST)
    • RE: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Joel Jaeggli (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 09:39:33 EST)
      • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:35:36 EST)
    • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Leo Bicknell (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 11:02:16 EST)
  • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Petri Helenius (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 09:40:15 EST)
  • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses bill (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 09:54:39 EST)
  • RE: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:00:12 EST)
  • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Bob Snyder (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:15:01 EST)
  • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Niels Bakker (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 11:03:01 EST)
  • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Petri Helenius (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 13:40:22 EST)
    • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Leo Bicknell (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:12:58 EST)
  • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Petri Helenius (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 13:43:52 EST)
    • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Niels Bakker (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:34:26 EST)
  • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Petri Helenius (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 13:54:55 EST)
  • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Stephen J. Wilcox (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:13:12 EST)
  • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Petri Helenius (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:53:30 EST)
    • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Leo Bicknell (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 15:49:48 EST)
  • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Petri Helenius (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 15:11:41 EST)
  • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Stephen J. Wilcox (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 15:52:51 EST)
  • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Petri Helenius (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 15:56:36 EST)
  • RE: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Terry Baranski (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 17:42:55 EST)
  • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Kevin Oberman (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 18:37:43 EST)
  • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Richard A Steenbergen (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 19:00:31 EST)
  • RE: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses (no name) (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 05:24:56 EST)
  • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Hani Mustafa (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 17:46:44 EST)
    • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Iljitsch van Beijnum (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 18:21:08 EST)
    • MTUs - Was: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Warren Kumari (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 15:04:00 EST)
      • Re: MTUs - Was: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Kevin Oberman (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 15:38:17 EST)
      • Re: MTUs - Was: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 16:18:17 EST)
      • Re: MTUs - Was: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 15:43:39 EST)
      • Re: MTUs - Was: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses M. David Leonard (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 17:22:35 EST)
      • Re: MTUs - Was: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 18:00:10 EST)
      • Re: MTUs - Was: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses (no name) (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 05:24:12 EST)
      • Re: MTUs - Was: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Iljitsch van Beijnum (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 08:43:50 EST)
      • Re: MTUs - Was: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Randy Bush (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 09:43:05 EST)
  • Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses Robert E. Seastrom (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 18:12:53 EST)
• wildly successful bill (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 23:37:32 EST)
• Re: updated root hints file Doug Barton (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 03:25:17 EST)
• antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Stephen J. Wilcox (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 08:58:17 EST)
  • Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 09:04:50 EST)
  • Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Daniel Senie (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 09:16:44 EST)
  • Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Stephen J. Wilcox (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 09:43:25 EST)
  • Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 09:49:25 EST)
    • Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 01:27:08 EST)
  • Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Joe Maimon (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:13:21 EST)
  • Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:30:06 EST)
  • Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Joe Maimon (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:49:34 EST)
  • Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:56:28 EST)
  • Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Joe Maimon (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 11:49:40 EST)
  • Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Adi Linden (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:14:11 EST)
• Latest IE patch breaking non username:password@encoded websites? Herman Harless (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 12:26:48 EST)
  • RE: Latest IE patch breaking non username:password@encoded websites? Bob German (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 12:28:43 EST)
  • Re: Latest IE patch breaking non username:password@encoded websites? Bryan Heitman (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 12:34:20 EST)
    • Re: Latest IE patch breaking non username:password@encoded websites? Jeff Workman (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 13:20:23 EST)
      • Re: Latest IE patch breaking non username:password@encoded websites? Scott Call (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 13:31:16 EST)
    • RE: Latest IE patch breaking non username:password@encoded websites? David Schwartz (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 13:21:13 EST)
  • Re: Latest IE patch breaking non username:password@encoded websites? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 12:40:08 EST)
    • Re: Latest IE patch breaking non username:password@encoded websites? Alexei Roudnev (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 23:59:32 EST)
      • Re: Latest IE patch breaking non username:password@encoded websites? Duane Wessels (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 01:20:50 EST)
• [OT] Need Comcast Contact Tim Wesemann (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 12:21:49 EST)
  • Re: [OT] Need Comcast Contact Tim Wesemann (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 12:35:03 EST)
• does your ISP need more peering? Matthew Kaufman (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 12:27:23 EST)
• RE: Latest IE patch breaking non username:password@encoded websites? Herman Harless (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:28:35 EST)
  • Re: Latest IE patch breaking non username:password@encoded websites? Alexei Roudnev (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 23:54:49 EST)
• Poor connectivity to new b.root-servers.net address? (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:32:13 EST)
  • Re: Poor connectivity to new b.root-servers.net address? bill (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 17:18:43 EST)
  • RE: Poor connectivity to new b.root-servers.net address? Ejay Hire (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 17:21:57 EST)
  • Re: Poor connectivity to new b.root-servers.net address? Simon Waters (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 17:46:56 EST)
  • Re: Poor connectivity to new b.root-servers.net address? Erik-Jan Bos (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 18:09:06 EST)
  • Re: Poor connectivity to new b.root-servers.net address? Lars Erik Gullerud (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 18:23:44 EST)
  • Re: Poor connectivity to new b.root-servers.net address? Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 18:26:58 EST)
  • Re: Poor connectivity to new b.root-servers.net address? bill (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 18:32:53 EST)
  • Re: Poor connectivity to new b.root-servers.net address? bill (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 18:34:32 EST)
  • Re: Poor connectivity to new b.root-servers.net address? Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 18:38:23 EST)
  • Re: Poor connectivity to new b.root-servers.net address? bill (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 18:46:07 EST)
  • Re: Poor connectivity to new b.root-servers.net address? (no name) (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 02:24:16 EST)
• Re[2]: B.root-servers renumbering John L Crain (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 18:15:08 EST)
• Cisco: limit number of DHCP addresses per VC? Claydon, Tom (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:38:27 EST)
  • Re: Cisco: limit number of DHCP addresses per VC? Jesper Skriver (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 17:53:26 EST)
• Road Runner refusing us, others? Mark Jeftovic (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:48:52 EST)
  • Re: Road Runner refusing us, others? (no name) (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:54:34 EST)
  • RE: Road Runner refusing us, others? Michel Py (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:23:43 EST)
• Re: CULPRIT - poor connectivity to new b.root-servers.net Jared Mauch (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:20:27 EST)
• [OT] need att.net postmaster contact Omar (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 14:04:20 EST)
• Re: here are some postfix patterns i found useful today Paul Vixie (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 14:20:19 EST)
• Sup2/MSFC2 Working netflow config for hybrid Malayter, Christopher (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 14:45:50 EST)
• Data Center Building Considerations Aaron Thomas (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 17:27:50 EST)
  • Re: Data Center Building Considerations Deepak Jain (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 17:48:53 EST)
  • Re: Data Center Building Considerations J. Oquendo (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 18:21:08 EST)
  • RE: Data Center Building Considerations Burton, Chris (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 18:27:44 EST)
• Contact needed for CERFnet? J. Oquendo (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 20:50:03 EST)
• ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 Ingevaldson, Dan (ISS Atlanta) (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 22:32:53 EST)
  • Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 Suresh Ramasubramanian (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 11:56:22 EST)
    • Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 Alexei Roudnev (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 12:30:01 EST)
      • Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 Martin Hepworth (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 12:41:25 EST)
      • Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 Christopher L. Morrow (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 12:45:16 EST)
  • Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 Suresh Ramasubramanian (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 12:24:03 EST)
  • Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 JC Dill (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 13:13:23 EST)
  • Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 14:37:48 EST)
    • Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 Crist Clark (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 14:54:15 EST)
    • Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 Steven M. Bellovin (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 14:56:13 EST)
      • Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 15:07:20 EST)
      • Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 (no name) (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 15:11:41 EST)
      • Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 15:45:31 EST)
  • Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 Stephen Stuart (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 15:27:11 EST)
  • RE: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 McBurnett, Jim (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 09:43:25 EST)
    • RE: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 Chris Brenton (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 13:19:08 EST)
  • RE: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Checkpoint Firewall-1 and VPN-1 Ingevaldson, Dan (ISS Atlanta) (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 15:39:56 EST)
• Peering BOF VII - Peering Personals is Full William B. Norton (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 11:53:53 EST)
• Re: MTUs - Was: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918addresses (no name) (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 15:34:29 EST)
• Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core networks? Pekka Savola (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 05:53:46 EST)
  • Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core networks? Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:58:04 EST)
    • Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core networks? Randy Bush (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 12:20:30 EST)
      • Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core networks? Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 13:05:52 EST)
      • Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core networks? Richard A Steenbergen (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 13:12:25 EST)
      • Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core networks? Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 13:39:09 EST)
      • Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core networks? Randy Bush (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 13:45:51 EST)
      • Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core networks? Petri Helenius (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 13:55:00 EST)
      • Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core networks? Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 14:32:57 EST)
      • Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core networks? Petri Helenius (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 14:40:09 EST)
      • Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core networks? Richard A Steenbergen (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 14:47:03 EST)
      • Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core networks? Richard A Steenbergen (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 13:59:39 EST)
      • Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core networks? Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 14:40:06 EST)
  • Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core networks? Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 13:56:39 EST)
  • Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core networks? Andy Dills (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 14:04:31 EST)
  • Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core networks? (no name) (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 04:59:40 EST)
• The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 06:00:00 EST)
• greylisting Dmitri Krioukov (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 13:40:14 EST)
  • Re: greylisting Ken Leland (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 15:41:13 EST)
  • Re: greylisting Suresh Ramasubramanian (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 22:19:12 EST)
  • RE: greylisting Dmitri Krioukov (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 22:33:21 EST)
  • RE: greylisting Dmitri Krioukov (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 23:30:59 EST)
• ev1.net security contact John Obi (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 13:44:39 EST)
• Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. Drew Weaver (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 16:15:10 EST)
  • Re: Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 15:55:01 EST)
  • RE: Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. Wayne Gustavus (nanog) (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 11:56:28 EST)
    • Re: Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. Marshall Eubanks (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 12:37:55 EST)
    • Re: Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 21:58:25 EST)
  • RE: Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. Wayne Gustavus (nanog) (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 23:44:38 EST)
    • Re: Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 23:55:01 EST)
      • Re: Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. Sean Donelan (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 02:01:29 EST)
  • Re: Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 02:27:49 EST)
    • Re: Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 03:56:39 EST)
    • Re: Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. Guðbjörn Hreinsson (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 12:18:53 EST)
      • Re: Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 21:57:14 EST)
  • Re: Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 04:05:30 EST)
    • Re: Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 12:12:46 EST)
  • Re: Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. E.B. Dreger (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 16:24:22 EST)
  • Re: Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. E.B. Dreger (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 18:23:48 EST)
  • Re: Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 21:25:42 EST)
  • Re: Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 21:52:41 EST)
  • Re: Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. Scott A Crosby (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 17:32:46 EST)
  • RE: Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. Steve Birnbaum (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 04:47:01 EST)
  • Re: Monumentous task of making a list of all DDoS Zombies. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 04:56:57 EST)
• RE: Verizon Mail Troubles Curtis Maurand (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 15:51:44 EST)
  • RE: Verizon Mail Troubles Curtis Maurand (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 17:25:56 EST)
• Stopping open proxies and open relays Adi Linden (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 23:43:39 EST)
  • Re: Stopping open proxies and open relays Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 23:53:11 EST)
  • Re: Stopping open proxies and open relays Adi Linden (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 00:00:12 EST)
    • Re: Stopping open proxies and open relays Jeff Shultz (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 12:03:46 EST)
  • RE: Stopping open proxies and open relays Michel Py (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 00:02:33 EST)
  • Re: Stopping open proxies and open relays Dr. Jeffrey Race (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 00:11:32 EST)
  • RE: Stopping open proxies and open relays Michel Py (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 00:17:00 EST)
  • Re: Stopping open proxies and open relays Chris Horry (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 00:27:59 EST)
  • RE: Stopping open proxies and open relays Vivien M. (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 00:37:27 EST)
  • RE: Stopping open proxies and open relays Michel Py (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 00:43:00 EST)
  • RE: Stopping open proxies and open relays Vivien M. (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 00:47:01 EST)
    • RE: Stopping open proxies and open relays Adi Linden (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 00:53:32 EST)
    • Re: Stopping open proxies and open relays Guðbjörn Hreinsson (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 07:03:22 EST)
      • Re: Stopping open proxies and open relays (no name) (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 12:42:54 EST)
  • Re: Stopping open proxies and open relays Adi Linden (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 00:51:04 EST)
  • RE: Stopping open proxies and open relays Michel Py (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 00:55:12 EST)
  • RE: Stopping open proxies and open relays Vivien M. (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 00:57:52 EST)
    • RE: Stopping open proxies and open relays Randy Bush (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 01:09:42 EST)
  • RE: Stopping open proxies and open relays Vivien M. (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 01:11:40 EST)
  • Re: Stopping open proxies and open relays Petri Helenius (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 13:27:11 EST)
  • Re: Stopping open proxies and open relays (no name) (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 05:08:35 EST)
  • Re: Stopping open proxies and open relays Gregh (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 06:58:13 EST)
    • Re: Stopping open proxies and open relays William Allen Simpson (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 08:51:42 EST)
  • Re: Stopping open proxies and open relays Simon Waters (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 13:21:38 EST)
  • Re: Stopping open proxies and open relays Dr. Jeffrey Race (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 20:15:54 EST)
    • Re: Stopping open proxies and open relays Guðbjörn S. Hreinsson (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 03:57:40 EST)
• Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? Alexander Hagen (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 05:48:32 EST)
  • Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 07:50:46 EST)
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? Alexander Hagen (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 08:49:03 EST)
  • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? Alexander Hagen (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 02:56:16 EST)
    • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? (no name) (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 08:25:26 EST)
    • RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? Tom (UnitedLayer) (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 15:49:41 EST)
  • Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? Robert E. Seastrom (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 19:59:09 EST)
• question on ptr rr (no name) (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 06:25:39 EST)
  • Re: question on ptr rr Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 06:33:05 EST)
  • Re: question on ptr rr Paul Vixie (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 13:22:07 EST)
  • Re: question on ptr rr Paul Vixie (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 19:16:09 EST)
    • Re: question on ptr rr Sean Donelan (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 20:46:48 EST)
  • Re: question on ptr rr Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 21:55:08 EST)
  • Re: question on ptr rr Paul Vixie (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 15:29:17 EST)
  • Re: question on ptr rr Chris Adams (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 16:59:43 EST)
  • Re: question on ptr rr Steven M. Bellovin (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 18:36:42 EST)
  • Re: question on ptr rr Paul Vixie (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 23:22:31 EST)
  • Re: question on ptr rr Lou Katz (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 00:10:50 EST)
  • Re: question on ptr rr (no name) (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 05:38:20 EST)
    • Re: question on ptr rr Randy Bush (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 09:10:51 EST)
    • Re: question on ptr rr (no name) (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 11:59:41 EST)
  • Re: question on ptr rr Niels Bakker (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 08:21:34 EST)
  • Re: question on ptr rr Robert E. Seastrom (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 08:40:13 EST)
  • Re: question on ptr rr Arnold Nipper (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 12:13:53 EST)
  • Re: question on ptr rr Paul Vixie (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 17:15:01 EST)
  • Re: question on ptr rr Paul Vixie (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 19:03:45 EST)
  • Re: question on ptr rr (no name) (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 05:54:07 EST)
  • Re: question on ptr rr Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 12:32:25 EST)
  • Re: question on ptr rr Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 12:38:51 EST)
  • Re: question on ptr rr Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 22:32:53 EST)
• Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or othervendor ? (no name) (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 07:32:21 EST)
• hotmail postmaster contact? Paul E (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 11:27:48 EST)
• Lame Yahoo social engineering scam Scott Call (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 15:34:05 EST)
  • Re: Lame Yahoo social engineering scam Jason Lixfeld (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 17:38:37 EST)
  • Re: Lame Yahoo social engineering scam (no name) (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 20:39:14 EST)
• abusereporting (was Re: Monumentous task of making a list) Mikael Abrahamsson (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 04:43:11 EST)
  • RE: abusereporting (was Re: Monumentous task of making a list) Stephen Gill (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 12:27:03 EST)
  • Re: abusereporting (was Re: Monumentous task of making a list) Steven M. Bellovin (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 20:08:29 EST)
• The Cidr Report (no name) (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 04:58:31 EST)
• Re: abusereporting Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 06:00:56 EST)
• Fwd: SECURITY: Abuse & upnormal traffic in 207.218.250.181 [ev1.net] John Obi (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 11:37:50 EST)
• Dumb users spread viruses Sean Donelan (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 15:41:53 EST)
  • Re: Dumb users spread viruses E.B. Dreger (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 16:03:29 EST)
  • Re: Dumb users spread viruses Paul Vixie (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 17:46:17 EST)
    • Re: Dumb users spread viruses Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 21:23:10 EST)
  • Re: Dumb users spread viruses Adi Linden (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 18:35:43 EST)
  • Re: Dumb users spread viruses (no name) (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 19:08:26 EST)
  • RE: Dumb users spread viruses Terry Baranski (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 19:32:16 EST)
    • Re: Dumb users spread viruses Roland Perry (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 19:46:51 EST)
  • Re: Dumb users spread viruses E.B. Dreger (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 20:17:00 EST)
  • Re: Dumb users spread viruses Roland Perry (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 22:00:08 EST)
  • Re: Dumb users spread viruses Petri Helenius (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 02:35:42 EST)
  • Re: Dumb users spread viruses Roland Perry (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 08:23:16 EST)
  • Re: Dumb users spread viruses John Payne (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 09:16:58 EST)
    • Re: Dumb users spread viruses John Payne (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 09:27:27 EST)
    • Network and security experts (was Re: Dumb users spread viruses) Sean Donelan (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 12:41:26 EST)
      • Re: Network and security experts (was Re: Dumb users spread viruses) Kevin Oberman (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 13:02:51 EST)
      • Re: Network and security experts (was Re: Dumb users spread viruses) (no name) (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 19:18:45 EST)
      • Re: Network and security experts (was Re: Dumb users spread viruses) Wayne E. Bouchard (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 13:12:58 EST)
      • Re: Network and security experts (was Re: Dumb users spread viruses) Steven M. Bellovin (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 13:39:33 EST)
  • Re: Dumb users spread viruses Paul Vixie (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 10:29:40 EST)
    • Re: Dumb users spread viruses Todd Vierling (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 11:42:40 EST)
  • Re: Dumb users spread viruses Petri Helenius (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 10:35:58 EST)
  • Re: Dumb users spread viruses Roland Perry (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 11:07:35 EST)
  • Re: Dumb users spread viruses Niels Bakker (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 11:21:10 EST)
  • Re: Dumb users spread viruses Roland Perry (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 11:49:28 EST)
  • RE: Dumb users spread viruses Michel Py (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 13:59:41 EST)
  • Re: Dumb users spread viruses Tom (UnitedLayer) (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 15:47:08 EST)
  • Re: Dumb users spread viruses Eric A. Hall (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 16:16:52 EST)
  • Re: Dumb users spread viruses (no name) (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 05:42:12 EST)
• NANOG30 - Bar connectivity? Timothy Brown (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 16:11:05 EST)
• Re: Dumb users spread viruses (here's one!) Dr. Jeffrey Race (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 19:59:58 EST)
• Applying HD Ratio to all IPv4 allocations (no name) (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 09:04:27 EST)
  • Re: Applying HD Ratio to all IPv4 allocations williamelan.net (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 13:42:07 EST)
• P2P open source blocking project William Warren (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 10:42:27 EST)
  • Re: P2P open source blocking project Joel Jaeggli (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 11:41:08 EST)
  • Re: P2P open source blocking project (no name) (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 11:51:50 EST)
• RE: abusereporting Andy Warner (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 12:25:22 EST)
• OT - Special Interest Texas Reunion Timothy Brown (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 13:36:49 EST)
• Hardening a control plane Frank P. Troy (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 14:46:51 EST)
• RE: SECURITY: Abuse & upnormal traffic in 207.218.250.181 [ev1.net] John Obi (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 14:40:02 EST)
• Yahoo DNS issue bcm (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 16:26:16 EST)
• IPSEC server at NANOG30 (fwd) Susan Harris (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 16:57:32 EST)
• [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls technologists "biased" Gregory Hicks (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 18:11:25 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls technologists "biased" Alex Kamantauskas (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 18:18:00 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls technologists "biased" williamelan.net (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 19:32:47 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls technologists "biased" Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 23:05:06 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls technologists "biased" Randall Pigott (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 10:58:39 EST)
    • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls technologists "biased" Chris Woodfield (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 11:31:20 EST)
    • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls technologists "biased" Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 12:36:04 EST)
      • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls technologists "biased" Paul Vixie (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 13:19:03 EST)
• Root Servers Request Donovan Hill (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 19:05:10 EST)
  • Re: Root Servers Request Philip J. Nesser II (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 19:37:41 EST)
  • Re: Root Servers Request Todd Vierling (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 19:29:26 EST)
  • Re: Root Servers Request Deepak Jain (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 19:36:12 EST)
  • Re: Root Servers Request Paul Vixie (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 19:37:54 EST)
  • Re: Root Servers Request bill (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 20:13:44 EST)
    • Re: Root Servers Request Todd Vierling (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 22:05:33 EST)
  • Re: Root Servers Request Donovan Hill (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 23:02:12 EST)
  • Re: Root Servers Request Donovan Hill (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 23:03:33 EST)
  • Re: Root Servers Request Paul Vixie (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 23:32:23 EST)
  • Re: Root Servers Request Stephen J. Wilcox (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 14:03:52 EST)
    • Re: Root Servers Request (no name) (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 14:18:37 EST)
• Where can I find a list of IPs and their regions. Matthew Crocker (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 19:43:02 EST)
  • Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and their regions. Arnold Nipper (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 19:53:18 EST)
    • Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and their regions. Matthew Crocker (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 20:50:10 EST)
  • Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and their regions. (no name) (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 20:33:38 EST)
  • Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and their regions. williamelan.net (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 22:22:30 EST)
  • Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and their regions. just me (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 21:25:35 EST)
  • Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and their regions. Andy Smith (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 23:36:34 EST)
  • Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and their regions. Arnold Nipper (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 01:51:19 EST)
    • Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and their regions. Matthew Crocker (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 07:51:47 EST)
  • Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and their regions. Scott Weeks (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 18:43:02 EST)
  • Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and their regions. Arnold Nipper (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 19:05:01 EST)
  • Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and their regions. Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 19:52:54 EST)
  • Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and their regions. williamelan.net (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 22:02:38 EST)
  • Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and their regions. Scott Weeks (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 11:14:14 EST)
  • Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and their regions. Scott Weeks (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 11:52:34 EST)
  • Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and their regions. Scott Weeks (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 17:07:06 EST)
• Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Paul Vixie (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 23:37:09 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 23:51:21 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls David Lesher (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 00:10:58 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Stephane Bortzmeyer (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 03:51:38 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls (no name) (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 10:48:20 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Wayne E. Bouchard (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 10:58:02 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Paul Vixie (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 19:25:01 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Paul Vixie (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 13:22:20 EST)
    • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls John Palmer (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 13:43:40 EST)
      • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls (no name) (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 14:41:34 EST)
      • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:56:53 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 14:41:34 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:54:51 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Paul Vixie (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 18:06:22 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Dr. Jeffrey Race (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 20:34:32 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Jason Nealis (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 09:01:05 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls ken emery (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 10:59:27 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls (no name) (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 11:31:22 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Dan Hollis (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 15:09:56 EST)
    • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Brian Bruns (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 15:31:33 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Paul Vixie (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 15:30:39 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Jason Nealis (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:24:49 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Dan Hollis (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:54:58 EST)
• WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scenarios-analysis-01.txt (fwd) Pekka Savola (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 01:21:53 EST)
• Microsoft Messenger sign-on issues Sean Donelan (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 01:34:57 EST)
• Need some info on network management Savitha Kumar (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 01:36:37 EST)
  • Re: Need some info on network management Sean Donelan (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 01:54:43 EST)
  • Re: Need some info on network management Savitha Kumar (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 05:06:44 EST)
• RE: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls David Luyer (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 04:06:24 EST)
  • RE: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Paul Wouters (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 12:13:40 EST)
    • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls Joshua Coombs (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 12:32:56 EST)
    • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls William Allen Simpson (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 13:24:20 EST)
• IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 07:58:40 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Jeroen Massar (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 08:07:27 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 08:09:48 EST)
    • RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 08:19:51 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Jeroen Massar (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 08:44:37 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? bill (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 09:48:42 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Jeroen Massar (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 11:10:32 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Mark Andrews (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 18:53:47 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Jeroen Massar (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 19:03:24 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Mark Andrews (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 19:22:16 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Paul Vixie (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 19:36:19 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 21:38:24 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Mark Andrews (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 06:49:26 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? leo vegoda (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 03:18:18 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Ronald van der Pol (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 05:54:37 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Pekka Savola (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 07:45:17 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Paul Vixie (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 10:23:46 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 15:24:14 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Paul Vixie (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 15:37:36 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 17:07:17 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Paul Vixie (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 15:55:54 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? (no name) (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 16:00:03 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Jeroen Massar (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 16:53:47 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Paul Vixie (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 17:11:57 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Todd Vierling (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 21:01:39 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? bill (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 22:47:32 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation? Jeroen Massar (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 06:37:21 EST)
• Williams Telecom Wesley Vaux (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 09:46:18 EST)
• NTIA/DoC public comment period Tony Hain (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 10:00:04 EST)
  • Re: NTIA/DoC public comment period Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 10:13:24 EST)
    • Re: NTIA/DoC public comment period Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 15:44:37 EST)
  • Re: NTIA/DoC public comment period bill (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 20:47:30 EST)
• Re: Root^H^H^H^HGTLD Servers Request Stephen J. Wilcox (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 14:40:49 EST)
  • Re: Root^H^H^H^HGTLD Servers Request (no name) (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 14:59:02 EST)
• A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder David Monosov (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 14:54:51 EST)
  • Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder Curtis Maurand (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 17:35:05 EST)
  • Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder williamelan.net (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 18:52:05 EST)
  • Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder Paul Vixie (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 19:42:11 EST)
  • Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder Curtis Maurand (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 09:43:06 EST)
• SMTP authentication for broadband providers Dan Ellis (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 20:42:29 EST)
  • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Will Yardley (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 20:55:03 EST)
  • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Adi Linden (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 23:05:45 EST)
  • RE: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Mark Segal (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 10:45:56 EST)
  • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Jason McCormick (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 11:07:25 EST)
  • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Will Yardley (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 15:19:01 EST)
  • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Suresh Ramasubramanian (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 20:48:18 EST)
  • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Lou Katz (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 21:38:25 EST)
  • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers (no name) (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 06:42:04 EST)
  • RE: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Dan Ellis (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 14:30:53 EST)
  • RE: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Alexander Kiwerski (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 15:49:14 EST)
  • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Miquel van Smoorenburg (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 15:48:06 EST)
    • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Lou Katz (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 17:07:00 EST)
  • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers (no name) (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 06:05:16 EST)
    • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers (no name) (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 09:27:52 EST)
      • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Alex Bligh (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 11:42:59 EST)
    • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Mark Foster (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 10:23:20 EST)
  • Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers Alex Bligh (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 11:36:40 EST)
• Looking for someone who is very experienced with IPForwarding in Extreme switches Drew Weaver (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 22:21:00 EST)
• IDS data. Jamie Reid (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 23:09:18 EST)
  • Re: IDS data. Randy Bush (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 23:16:36 EST)
• Re: 7500 and DCEF Hank Nussbacher (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 00:26:39 EST)
• [University at Buffalo] MAN/MEN Research Enrico Riedel (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 00:34:41 EST)
• animations from "Making Sense of BGP" talk available Van Jacobson (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 02:14:15 EST)
  • Re: animations from "Making Sense of BGP" talk available Joe Loiacono (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 10:00:49 EST)
• Question Tracey Webb (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 11:21:35 EST)
• PING: blacklist.mail.ops.worldnet.att.net-clueful admin at AT&T Ben Browning (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 16:19:16 EST)
  • RE: PING: blacklist.mail.ops.worldnet.att.net-clueful admin at AT&T Ejay Hire (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 17:30:40 EST)
  • Re: PING: blacklist.mail.ops.worldnet.att.net-clueful admin at AT&T Mark E. Mallett (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 22:11:20 EST)
• New subgroups in the IRTF ASRG John R Levine (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 11:24:48 EST)
• Peering BOF VII Meeting Minutes (NANOG 30 Miami) William B. Norton (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 16:01:55 EST)
• Interesting BIND error Brian Wallingford (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 16:52:26 EST)
  • Re: Interesting BIND error Chris Adams (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 17:21:12 EST)
  • Re: Interesting BIND error Brian Bruns (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 17:31:52 EST)
  • Re: Interesting BIND error (no name) (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 17:52:41 EST)
  • Re: Interesting BIND error Joe Abley (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 17:52:23 EST)
  • Re: Interesting BIND error Mike Lewinski (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 20:54:10 EST)
• Re: SMTP authentication for broadband providers -- A MODEST PROPOSAL Dr. Jeffrey Race (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 02:08:26 EST)
• The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 06:00:01 EST)
• SMTP relaying policies for Commercial ISP customers...? Dan Ellis (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 09:00:04 EST)
  • Re: SMTP relaying policies for Commercial ISP customers...? Andy Dills (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 12:35:17 EST)
  • RE: SMTP relaying policies for Commercial ISP customers...? Dan Ellis (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 12:54:42 EST)
  • RE: SMTP relaying policies for Commercial ISP customers...? Andy Dills (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 13:12:20 EST)
    • Re: SMTP relaying policies for Commercial ISP customers...? Leo Vegoda (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 16:35:18 EST)
  • Re: SMTP relaying policies for Commercial ISP customers...? Steven Champeon (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 14:17:47 EST)
  • RE: SMTP relaying policies for Commercial ISP customers...? Ejay Hire (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 16:30:33 EST)
    • RE: SMTP relaying policies for Commercial ISP customers...? Daniel Reed (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 18:06:43 EST)
  • Re: SMTP relaying policies for Commercial ISP customers...? Petri Helenius (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 16:44:40 EST)
  • Re: SMTP relaying policies for Commercial ISP customers...? (no name) (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 17:14:00 EST)
    • Re: SMTP relaying policies for Commercial ISP customers...? Joseph Noonan (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 18:43:14 EST)
  • Re: SMTP relaying policies for Commercial ISP customers...? Andy Dills (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 17:19:14 EST)
• Nortel Optera 5200's Alex Rubenstein (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 10:29:05 EST)
• Wireless Pt-Pt in Washington DC ? Ben Crosby (Fri Feb 13 2004 - 19:02:58 EST)
• Anti-spam System Idea Tim Thorpe (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 03:30:30 EST)
  • RE: Anti-spam System Idea Tim Thorpe (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 03:56:16 EST)
    • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Petri Helenius (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 04:04:09 EST)
  • Re: Anti-spam System Idea (no name) (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 05:50:10 EST)
  • Re: Anti-spam System Idea william(at)elan.net (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 08:13:14 EST)
  • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 09:45:55 EST)
  • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Michael Wiacek (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 12:12:09 EST)
  • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Andy Dills (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 14:01:14 EST)
  • RE: Anti-spam System Idea Tim Thorpe (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 15:26:57 EST)
  • Re: Anti-spam System Idea (no name) (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 15:36:48 EST)
  • RE: Anti-spam System Idea Tim Thorpe (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 18:55:40 EST)
    • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Steven Champeon (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 19:16:42 EST)
    • RE: Anti-spam System Idea (no name) (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 20:21:29 EST)
      • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Jon R. Kibler (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 15:10:55 EST)
  • RE: Anti-spam System Idea Tim Thorpe (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 21:24:17 EST)
    • Re: Anti-spam System Idea (no name) (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 10:35:30 EST)
  • RE: Anti-spam System Idea william(at)elan.net (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 01:25:31 EST)
  • Re: Anti-spam System Idea (no name) (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 17:37:32 EST)
    • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Jon R. Kibler (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 20:43:23 EST)
  • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Rainer Atkins (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 22:21:02 EST)
  • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Stephen Sprunk (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 23:00:08 EST)
    • RE: Anti-spam System Idea Tim Thorpe (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 23:35:54 EST)
      • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Etaoin Shrdlu (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 23:41:24 EST)
    • Re: Anti-spam System Idea (no name) (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 23:33:38 EST)
    • Spam issue discussion lists [was Re: Anti-spam System Idea] Mark Jones (Mon Feb 16 2004 - 09:15:01 EST)
  • RE: Anti-spam System Idea (no name) (Mon Feb 16 2004 - 05:57:04 EST)
  • Re: Anti-spam System Idea (no name) (Mon Feb 16 2004 - 06:24:44 EST)
  • RE: Anti-spam System Idea Lawrence Baldwin (Mon Feb 16 2004 - 10:16:52 EST)
  • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Joe St Sauver (Mon Feb 16 2004 - 11:02:14 EST)
  • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Niels Bakker (Mon Feb 16 2004 - 11:08:39 EST)
  • RE: Anti-spam System Idea Timothy R. McKee (Mon Feb 16 2004 - 15:39:00 EST)
  • Re: Anti-spam System Idea Petri Helenius (Mon Feb 16 2004 - 16:06:15 EST)
  • RE: Anti-spam System Idea Timothy R. McKee (Mon Feb 16 2004 - 16:19:03 EST)
    • RE: Anti-spam System Idea Scott McGrath (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 08:10:36 EST)
• BGP - weight Sven Huster (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 07:23:06 EST)
  • Re: BGP - weight Danny McPherson (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 11:24:28 EST)
  • Re: BGP - weight E.B. Dreger (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 12:03:45 EST)
  • Re: BGP - weight Stephen J. Wilcox (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 12:46:09 EST)
  • Re: BGP - weight Sven Huster (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 13:00:51 EST)
  • Re: BGP - weight Stephen J. Wilcox (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 13:49:05 EST)
  • Re: BGP - weight Sven Huster (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 13:52:47 EST)
  • Re: BGP - weight E.B. Dreger (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 23:47:30 EST)
  • Re: BGP - weight E.B. Dreger (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 14:31:46 EST)
  • Re: BGP - weight Sven Huster (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 06:44:16 EST)
• Re: Anti-spam System Idea W.D.McKinney (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 20:32:17 EST)
• power outage in LA? matthew zeier (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 14:50:24 EST)
• Data center design ideas (no name) (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 10:10:51 EST)
  • Re: Data center design ideas Stephen J. Wilcox (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 10:19:30 EST)
  • Re: Data center design ideas Bill Woodcock (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 11:26:01 EST)
  • Re: Data center design ideas Stephen J. Wilcox (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 17:17:41 EST)
• Meeting stats from Miami Susan Harris (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 11:04:13 EST)
• Commerce IPv6 RFC News Alfred Lee (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 12:32:03 EST)
• Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Tony Hain (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 15:17:49 EST)
  • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Steven M. Bellovin (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 15:50:23 EST)
    • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 15:59:43 EST)
  • RE: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Don Gould (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 16:08:25 EST)
    • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) (no name) (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 13:06:05 EST)
  • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Alex Bligh (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 16:48:18 EST)
    • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Steven M. Bellovin (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 17:28:32 EST)
      • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Alex Bligh (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:56:17 EST)
      • RE: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Tony Hain (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 19:19:37 EST)
      • RE: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Alex Bligh (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 19:48:03 EST)
      • RE: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Tony Hain (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 20:27:46 EST)
      • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Paul Jakma (Thu Feb 19 2004 - 01:51:04 EST)
    • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) John Kristoff (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 17:59:58 EST)
  • RE: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Chen, Weijing (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 17:10:22 EST)
    • RE: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Alex Bligh (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 17:20:53 EST)
  • RE: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Chen, Weijing (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 17:29:59 EST)
  • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 17:37:02 EST)
  • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Robert E. Seastrom (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 17:48:44 EST)
  • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Steve Uurtamo (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:03:39 EST)
  • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Nathan J. Mehl (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:13:55 EST)
  • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Stephen J. Wilcox (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:59:20 EST)
  • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Joel Jaeggli (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 21:17:24 EST)
  • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Todd Vierling (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 01:21:20 EST)
  • RE: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Alex Bligh (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 04:49:20 EST)
  • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) (no name) (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 06:02:11 EST)
  • RE: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Tony Hain (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 18:43:35 EST)
  • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Dr. Jeffrey Race (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 23:41:37 EST)
    • Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) (no name) (Thu Feb 19 2004 - 10:20:45 EST)
• Analogies=dead threads (was RE:Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse) Rainer Atkins (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 15:38:12 EST)
  • Re: Analogies=dead threads (was RE:Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse) (no name) (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 16:05:54 EST)
    • Re: Analogies=dead threads (was RE:Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse) Warren Kumari (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 21:10:41 EST)
  • Re: Analogies=dead threads (was RE:Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse) E.B. Dreger (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 21:19:48 EST)
• An alternate plan for reducing spam just me (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 10:11:27 EST)
• Problems on ATDN this evening? Chris Horry (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 20:00:08 EST)
  • Re: Problems on ATDN this evening? Jon Mitchell (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 08:18:50 EST)
• 80/udp floods? Scott Call (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 05:45:14 EST)
  • Re: 80/udp floods? Wayne E. Bouchard (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 19:46:23 EST)
  • Re: 80/udp floods? Deepak Jain (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 20:01:24 EST)
  • Re: 80/udp floods? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 21:03:12 EST)
• standard transit arrangements Sven Huster (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 06:50:54 EST)
• Cogeco Cable listening? Christopher Chin (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 12:26:37 EST)
• Equinix 350 E. Cermak - Contact Please Eric Kuhnke (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 18:43:20 EST)
  • Re: Equinix 350 E. Cermak - Contact Please Tom (UnitedLayer) (Thu Feb 19 2004 - 03:41:17 EST)
• firstam.com contact Jonathan Nichols (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 20:09:27 EST)
• Anycast and windows servers Sean Donelan (Wed Feb 18 2004 - 22:43:03 EST)
  • Re: Anycast and windows servers Joe Abley (Thu Feb 19 2004 - 08:40:20 EST)
  • Re: Anycast and windows servers Patrick W.Gilmore (Thu Feb 19 2004 - 20:06:08 EST)
  • RE: Anycast and windows servers Buhrmaster, Gary (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 12:18:37 EST)
  • Re: Anycast and windows servers Steve Francis (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 12:59:25 EST)
• Istanbul / Turkey Area (no name) (Thu Feb 19 2004 - 15:39:15 EST)
• Verizon clients DOS own site? (no name) (Thu Feb 19 2004 - 15:57:15 EST)
  • Re: Verizon clients DOS own site? William Warren (Thu Feb 19 2004 - 16:48:18 EST)
    • Re: Verizon clients DOS own site? Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Thu Feb 19 2004 - 17:36:52 EST)
  • RE: Verizon clients DOS own site? Wayne Gustavus (nanog) (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 22:45:21 EST)
  • Re: Verizon clients DOS own site? William Warren (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 23:23:51 EST)
    • routing invalid IP addresses Geo. (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 07:47:46 EST)
      • Re: routing invalid IP addresses Bill Woodcock (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 08:03:08 EST)
      • Re: routing invalid IP addresses Geo. (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 08:41:13 EST)
      • Re: routing invalid IP addresses Christopher X. Candreva (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 11:24:14 EST)
      • RE: routing invalid IP addresses Geo. (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 12:38:42 EST)
      • Re: routing invalid IP addresses Brian Knoblauch (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 21:18:16 EST)
      • Re: routing invalid IP addresses Geo. (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 22:21:56 EST)
      • Re: routing invalid IP addresses Stephen J. Wilcox (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 14:21:35 EST)
      • Re: routing invalid IP addresses Richard A Steenbergen (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 08:16:12 EST)
      • Re: routing invalid IP addresses Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 10:33:02 EST)
      • Re: routing invalid IP addresses Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 11:15:39 EST)
      • Re: routing invalid IP addresses Mikael Abrahamsson (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 11:08:29 EST)
      • Re: routing invalid IP addresses bill (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 19:25:38 EST)
• XO contact. John Obi (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 00:55:49 EST)
• Re: Identifying IP address types (fwd) Sean Donelan (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 05:35:51 EST)
• Verisign wins an award... Ray Bellis (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 04:07:07 EST)
  • Re: Verisign wins an award... william(at)elan.net (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 05:16:42 EST)
  • Re: Verisign wins an award... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 05:04:51 EST)
• The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 06:00:00 EST)
• whois.internic.net problems? Jon R. Kibler (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 13:40:50 EST)
  • RE: whois.internic.net problems? Alexander Kiwerski (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 15:13:05 EST)
• RouteScience PathControl vs. Radware Linkproof Dave Temkin (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 15:54:13 EST)
• eBGP, iBGP, injecting networks (no name) (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 17:41:46 EST)
  • Re: eBGP, iBGP, injecting networks william(at)elan.net (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 19:08:03 EST)
  • Re: eBGP, iBGP, injecting networks william(at)elan.net (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 19:10:48 EST)
  • Re: eBGP, iBGP, injecting networks Ing. Hans L. Reyes (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 20:48:56 EST)
  • Re: eBGP, iBGP, injecting networks James (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 00:27:08 EST)
  • Re: eBGP, iBGP, injecting networks Stephen Perciballi (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 21:47:11 EST)
  • Re: eBGP, iBGP, injecting networks Curtis Maurand (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 10:48:54 EST)
  • RE: eBGP, iBGP, injecting networks Fowlie, Colin (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 11:48:19 EST)
• PAIX Palo-Alto Andre Chapuis (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 12:07:21 EST)
• M$ CD patches David Lesher (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 16:45:15 EST)
  • RE: M$ CD patches Michel Py (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 16:56:45 EST)
    • RE: M$ CD patches Sean Donelan (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 17:44:46 EST)
  • Re: M$ CD patches David Lesher (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 18:01:01 EST)
    • Re: M$ CD patches Sean Donelan (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 18:16:13 EST)
  • RE: M$ CD patches Michel Py (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 18:30:47 EST)
• MS can't live with it can't live... with it J. Oquendo (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 18:22:31 EST)
• BL of Compromised Hosts? Deepak Jain (Sun Feb 22 2004 - 11:12:38 EST)
  • Re: BL of Compromised Hosts? Daniel Concepcion (Sun Feb 22 2004 - 13:20:25 EST)
  • Re: BL of Compromised Hosts? Daniel Senie (Sun Feb 22 2004 - 14:24:12 EST)
  • Re: BL of Compromised Hosts? Rafi Sadowsky (Sun Feb 22 2004 - 15:31:45 EST)
  • RE: BL of Compromised Hosts? Michel Py (Sun Feb 22 2004 - 16:09:50 EST)
  • Re: BL of Compromised Hosts? Avleen Vig (Sun Feb 22 2004 - 16:48:24 EST)
    • Re: BL of Compromised Hosts? Andrew - Supernews (Sun Feb 22 2004 - 17:54:10 EST)
  • Re: BL of Compromised Hosts? Robert E. Seastrom (Sun Feb 22 2004 - 18:19:57 EST)
  • RE: BL of Compromised Hosts? Michel Py (Sun Feb 22 2004 - 21:44:09 EST)
  • Re: BL of Compromised Hosts? william(at)elan.net (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 03:12:50 EST)
  • Re: BL of Compromised Hosts? Tom (UnitedLayer) (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 15:38:23 EST)
  • RE: BL of Compromised Hosts? Michel Py (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 21:37:35 EST)
• O/T: fake identity seal was: RE: M$ CD patches Michel Py (Sun Feb 22 2004 - 23:20:15 EST)
• BGP, MED, Confederation presentation Sam Stickland (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 11:02:08 EST)
  • Re: BGP, MED, Confederation presentation Pete Templin (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 11:32:13 EST)
    • Re: BGP, MED, Confederation presentation Sam Stickland (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 11:36:22 EST)
  • Re: BGP, MED, Confederation presentation Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:48:05 EST)
• Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls technologists "biased" Curtis Maurand (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 12:17:28 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls technologists "biased" Petri Helenius (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 13:38:03 EST)
  • Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls technologists "biased" Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:44:56 EST)
• T1 Customer CPE Replacement? Claydon, Tom (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 15:37:49 EST)
  • Re: T1 Customer CPE Replacement? Scott McGrath (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:11:20 EST)
  • RE: T1 Customer CPE Replacement? Sean Crandall (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 16:27:49 EST)
  • Re: T1 Customer CPE Replacement? Chris Adams (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 17:00:17 EST)
  • Re: T1 Customer CPE Replacement? Brian Bruns (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 17:23:34 EST)
  • Re: T1 Customer CPE Replacement? Curtis Maurand (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 13:35:50 EST)
  • Re: T1 Customer CPE Replacement? Curtis Maurand (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 17:23:05 EST)
• possible L3 issues (no name) (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 17:53:10 EST)
  • Re: possible L3 issues Richard A Steenbergen (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 17:57:51 EST)
  • RE: possible L3 issues Chris Ranch (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 17:59:35 EST)
  • RE: possible L3 issues Sean Crandall (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 17:58:40 EST)
    • Re: possible L3 issues Scott Francis (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 18:23:44 EST)
  • Re: possible L3 issues Will Orton (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 18:06:17 EST)
  • RE: possible L3 issues Arjan Lugtenberg (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 18:04:14 EST)
  • RE: possible L3 issues (no name) (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 18:08:32 EST)
  • Re: possible L3 issues Gary E. Miller (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 18:05:19 EST)
  • RE: possible L3 issues Arjan Lugtenberg (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 18:23:50 EST)
    • RE: possible L3 issues Erik Haagsman (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 07:35:28 EST)
  • Re: possible L3 issues German Martinez (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 18:08:55 EST)
  • RE: possible L3 issues Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 18:48:19 EST)
  • Re: possible L3 issues Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 18:57:59 EST)
  • RE: possible L3 issues Ryburn, Justin (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 18:34:47 EST)
• Genu/L3 Major Outage Chris Ranch (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 17:58:22 EST)
  • RE: Genu/L3 Major Outage Chris Ranch (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 18:11:51 EST)
    • RE: Genu/L3 Major Outage Randy Bush (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 19:23:51 EST)
  • Re: Genu/L3 Major Outage Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 20:13:49 EST)
  • RE: Genu/L3 Major Outage william(at)elan.net (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 21:24:21 EST)
• L3 burp today - what happened? David G. Andersen (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 17:59:25 EST)
  • Re: L3 burp today - what happened? Wayne E. Bouchard (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 18:13:32 EST)
  • Re: L3 burp today - what happened? Gary E. Miller (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 18:14:27 EST)
• Level3 issues? Scott Francis (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 18:01:05 EST)
• Re: possible L3 issues (more than LAX/SJC) J. Oquendo (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 19:30:30 EST)
• FCC rulemaking for mandatory outage reporting Sean Donelan (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 04:56:32 EST)
• 168.0.0.0/6 Randy Bush (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 10:20:30 EST)
  • Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Daniel Karrenberg (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 10:36:03 EST)
  • Re: 168.0.0.0/6 (no name) (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 10:46:05 EST)
  • Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Andre Chapuis (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 12:44:45 EST)
    • Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Randy Bush (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 17:46:53 EST)
  • Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Joe Provo (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 17:46:35 EST)
  • Re: 168.0.0.0/6 william(at)elan.net (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 19:35:06 EST)
  • RE: 168.0.0.0/6 Jeroen Massar (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 18:42:08 EST)
• Proposal: De-boganising New Address Blocks Daniel Karrenberg (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 11:07:56 EST)
  • RE: Proposal: De-boganising New Address Blocks Michel Py (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 23:29:04 EST)
  • RE: Proposal: De-boganising New Address Blocks (no name) (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 23:37:45 EST)
  • RE: Proposal: De-boganising New Address Blocks william(at)elan.net (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 01:16:19 EST)
• Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks (no name) (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 11:32:46 EST)
  • Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks Timothy Brown (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 11:59:25 EST)
  • Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks Daniel Karrenberg (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 12:28:48 EST)
  • Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks Petri Helenius (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 13:13:28 EST)
  • Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks william(at)elan.net (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 19:24:48 EST)
  • Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks Timothy Brown (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 22:28:51 EST)
  • Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks william(at)elan.net (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 00:07:50 EST)
  • Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks Randy Bush (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 18:48:46 EST)
• Sprint and AT&T backbone engineer (no name) (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 17:07:12 EST)
• Re: eBGP, iBGP, injecting networks- Thanks! '' (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 19:00:12 EST)
• SIGCOMM Workshop on Network Troubleshooting jon bennett (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 23:29:31 EST)
• RE: New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks Michel Py (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 22:51:35 EST)
  • RE: New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks Michel Py (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 22:59:15 EST)
  • RE: New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks william(at)elan.net (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 00:31:56 EST)
  • RE: New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks william(at)elan.net (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 00:40:40 EST)
  • RE: New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks william(at)elan.net (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 01:58:54 EST)
  • RE: New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks (no name) (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 05:31:49 EST)
• Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Jared Mauch (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 10:52:18 EST)
  • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) David Meyer (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 12:44:51 EST)
  • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Jared Mauch (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 13:04:16 EST)
    • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Matthew Crocker (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 13:43:14 EST)
  • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Steven M. Bellovin (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 13:28:38 EST)
  • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) David Meyer (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 13:34:55 EST)
    • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Matthew Crocker (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 13:57:14 EST)
  • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Petri Helenius (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 13:49:53 EST)
  • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Jared Mauch (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 13:56:51 EST)
  • RE: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Sean Crandall (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 14:02:14 EST)
  • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Petri Helenius (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 14:06:20 EST)
  • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Paul Vixie (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 14:06:03 EST)
  • RE: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Bora Akyol (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 14:16:50 EST)
  • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) David Meyer (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 14:19:16 EST)
  • RE: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Erik Haagsman (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 14:34:03 EST)
  • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Petri Helenius (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 14:37:24 EST)
  • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) (no name) (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 06:28:09 EST)
  • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) vijay gill (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 09:03:46 EST)
  • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) (no name) (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 09:48:55 EST)
    • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) (no name) (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 10:27:46 EST)
    • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Randy Bush (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 16:11:11 EST)
  • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) vijay gill (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 12:47:42 EST)
  • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) David Barak (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 13:05:03 EST)
  • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) vijay gill (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 13:11:58 EST)
  • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Brett Watson (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 13:23:43 EST)
  • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Petri Helenius (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 14:32:07 EST)
  • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) vijay gill (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 14:40:07 EST)
  • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) David Barak (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 15:22:05 EST)
  • Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Deepak Jain (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:18:00 EST)
• Sprint midwest/NW backbone issues? Dave O'Shea (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 17:31:23 EST)
• Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) W.D.McKinney (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 19:46:07 EST)
  • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Joe Abley (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 19:57:10 EST)
  • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Chris Yarnell (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 20:08:51 EST)
  • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) (no name) (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 06:48:17 EST)
  • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) vijay gill (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 09:10:16 EST)
    • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Stephen Sprunk (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 05:04:21 EST)
  • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) (no name) (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 09:54:12 EST)
• Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) W.D.McKinney (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 20:06:40 EST)
• Expectations or It can't happen to me (was Re: How Reliable) Sean Donelan (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 08:06:59 EST)
• How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Roland Perry (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 10:58:47 EST)
  • RE: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Bora Akyol (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 19:55:33 EST)
  • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) joe mcguckin (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 04:23:09 EST)
  • RE: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Pendergrass, Greg (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 10:24:28 EST)
    • RE: How reliable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Steve Gibbard (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 13:46:47 EST)
      • Re: How reliable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Stephen Sprunk (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 05:17:11 EST)
  • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 11:35:19 EST)
  • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Roland Perry (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 12:16:30 EST)
  • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Roland Perry (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 12:20:14 EST)
  • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) (no name) (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 12:47:28 EST)
  • RE: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Brian Knoblauch (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 15:22:37 EST)
  • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) (no name) (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 05:37:42 EST)
    • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Paul Jakma (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 08:39:36 EST)
    • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) (no name) (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 11:58:52 EST)
    • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Sam Stickland (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 12:18:25 EST)
  • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Petri Helenius (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:42:32 EST)
  • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Petri Helenius (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:19:48 EST)
  • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Petri Helenius (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:57:42 EST)
  • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:38:16 EST)
  • Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Roland Perry (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 17:35:58 EST)
• Microsoft on security holes Brian Bruns (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 12:42:07 EST)
• Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder) Deepak Jain (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 16:51:02 EST)
  • Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder) Neil J. McRae (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:03:52 EST)
    • Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder) Paul Vixie (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 18:59:51 EST)
  • Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder) John Neiberger (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:13:01 EST)
  • Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder) william(at)elan.net (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 18:25:33 EST)
  • Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder) Scott Call (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 18:57:12 EST)
  • Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder) william(at)elan.net (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 20:05:16 EST)
  • Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder) John Kinsella (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 18:55:39 EST)
  • RE: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder) David Schwartz (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 19:13:42 EST)
  • Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder) william(at)elan.net (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 20:29:28 EST)
  • RE: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder) Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 20:07:09 EST)
  • Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder) Paul Vixie (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 20:09:23 EST)
  • Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder) Deepak Jain (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 20:29:50 EST)
  • RE: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder) Stephen J. Wilcox (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 05:16:29 EST)
    • RE: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder) Mark Jeftovic (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 08:22:40 EST)
  • Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder) Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 08:29:06 EST)
    • Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder) Michael Painter (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 16:56:28 EST)
  • Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder) Paul Vixie (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 14:50:23 EST)
• ICANN/Registry Agreement: Deepak Jain (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 20:21:30 EST)
  • Re: ICANN/Registry Agreement: Brian Bruns (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 20:25:45 EST)
  • Re: ICANN/Registry Agreement: Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 20:35:54 EST)
  • Re: ICANN/Registry Agreement: Brian Bruns (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 20:36:20 EST)
  • Re: ICANN/Registry Agreement: David Barak (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 23:51:28 EST)
• Best Common Practice - Listening to local routes from peers? Michael Smith (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 23:22:59 EST)
  • Re: Best Common Practice - Listening to local routes from peers? Patrick W.Gilmore (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 23:28:18 EST)
  • Re: Best Common Practice - Listening to local routes from peers? James Edwards (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 01:21:58 EST)
    • Re: Best Common Practice - Listening to local routes from peers? Patrick W.Gilmore (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 08:16:55 EST)
      • Re: Best Common Practice - Listening to local routes from peers? james (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 13:51:09 EST)
      • Re: Best Common Practice - Listening to local routes from peers? Patrick W.Gilmore (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 14:08:50 EST)
  • Re: Best Common Practice - Listening to local routes from peers? Stephen J. Wilcox (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 05:37:06 EST)
• RE: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefind er) Pendergrass, Greg (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 04:43:20 EST)
• The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 06:00:00 EST)
• RE: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Wesley Vaux (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:11:00 EST)
• Sail Ho! (was Re: Lawsuit on ICANN ...) Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 18:37:09 EST)
• Possibly yet another MS mail worm Todd Vierling (Fri Feb 27 2004 - 19:12:42 EST)
  • Re: Possibly yet another MS mail worm Stephen Milton (Sat Feb 28 2004 - 01:42:42 EST)
• First Post! Annoying Debate at Work. Christopher Aldridge (Sun Feb 29 2004 - 05:31:22 EST)
  • Re: First Post! Annoying Debate at Work. Roland Perry (Sun Feb 29 2004 - 07:55:00 EST)
  • Re: First Post! Annoying Debate at Work. Randy Bush (Sun Feb 29 2004 - 09:23:09 EST)
  • Re: First Post! Annoying Debate at Work. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sun Feb 29 2004 - 10:17:21 EST)
  • Re: First Post! Annoying Debate at Work. Stephen J. Wilcox (Sun Feb 29 2004 - 10:58:32 EST)
  • Re: First Post! Annoying Debate at Work. Roland Perry (Sun Feb 29 2004 - 11:40:58 EST)
  • Re: First Post! Annoying Debate at Work. Ron da Silva (Sun Feb 29 2004 - 13:54:36 EST)
  • Re: First Post! Annoying Debate at Work. Ron da Silva (Sun Feb 29 2004 - 13:57:34 EST)

Last message date: Sun Feb 29 2004 - 21:34:31 EST
Archived on: Thu Dec 09 2004 - 16:09:19 EST

994 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
About this archive
Other mail archives