From: Adam McKenna (no email)
Date: Wed Dec 03 2003 - 12:27:22 EST
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 08:38:10AM -0800, Pete Ehlke wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:28:19AM -0500, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> >
> > ps - there's of course the rather umm... interesting content below ;)
> > http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/avoid-rfc-2317-delegation.html
> >
> Which is totally, completely wrong and causes, in both cases, servers to
> leak name space (which causes cache poisoning) and, in once case,
> servers to potentially be marked as lame. The man is flat out wrong.
> Don't follow his advice.
How can delegating in-addr.arpa on a per-ip basis be any different or worse
than delegating it using an rfc2317 scheme?
--Adam
|
|
|