Nanog 0309
By Date

Most recent messages
1582 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
About this archive
Other mail archives

Starting: Mon Sep 01 2003 - 01:38:24 EDT
Ending: Tue Sep 30 2003 - 22:15:35 EDT

RE: Tier-1 without their own backbone? Paul Timmins (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 01:29:08 EDT)
Weekly lamer list Rob Thomas (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 04:18:32 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Vadim Antonov (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 08:31:20 EDT)
Verio is reporting outage at 401 N. B. (no email) (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 13:47:41 EDT)
Re: Verio is reporting outage at 401 N. B. (no name) (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 14:11:16 EDT)
RE: On the back of other 'security' posts.... Terry Baranski (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 14:58:02 EDT)
RE: What do you want your ISP to block today? David Schwartz (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 20:12:49 EDT)
RE: On the back of other 'security' posts.... Daniel Senie (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 21:03:24 EDT)
Re: On the back of other 'security' posts.... Paul Vixie (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 21:45:41 EDT)
RE: dry pair Eric Germann (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 23:05:04 EDT)
Re: On the back of other 'security' posts.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 03:44:15 EDT)
RE: What do you want your ISP to block today? Vadim Antonov (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 03:57:23 EDT)
Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections Jonathan Crockett (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 10:59:51 EDT)
Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? Nenad Pudar (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 11:32:34 EDT)
Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? Jared Mauch (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 11:41:16 EDT)
Re: Blaster author identified, about to be arrested... Nathan E Norman (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 11:38:06 EDT)
bgp as-path info Austad, Jay (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 14:00:31 EDT)
RE: bgp as-path info Lucas Iglesias (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 14:10:17 EDT)
Re: bgp as-path info Jack Bates (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 14:16:48 EDT)
RE: bgp as-path info Austad, Jay (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 14:18:59 EDT)
Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? Nenad Pudar (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 14:25:20 EDT)
Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? Petri Helenius (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 15:03:45 EDT)
Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? Joel Jaeggli (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 14:56:27 EDT)
Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? Nenad Pudar (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 15:11:55 EDT)
IPv4/IPv6 issues (was Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now?) Bill Owens (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 15:28:00 EDT)
Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? Petri Helenius (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 15:47:14 EDT)
Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? Jared Mauch (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 15:49:53 EDT)
Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? Joel Jaeggli (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 15:53:50 EDT)
RE: What do you want your ISP to block today? David Schwartz (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 16:34:10 EDT)
Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? Nenad Pudar (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 16:34:18 EDT)
Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? Petri Helenius (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 16:46:46 EDT)
IPv6 vs IPv4 (Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now?) Jared Mauch (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 16:48:28 EDT)
Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? Kevin Oberman (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 16:53:58 EDT)
RE: What do you want your ISP to block today? Vadim Antonov (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 16:59:13 EDT)
Re: IPv6 vs IPv4 (Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now?) Nenad Pudar (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 17:18:23 EDT)
Re: IPv6 vs IPv4 (Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now?) Jack Bates (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:48:03 EDT)
RE: IPv6 vs IPv4 (Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now?) Jeroen Massar (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:59:35 EDT)
Re: Hey, QWEST clean up your network (no name) (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 19:08:22 EDT)
teleglobe planned outage - 2pm Pacific ? matthew zeier (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 19:55:37 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (no name) (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 21:47:39 EDT)
Re: IPv6 vs IPv4 (Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now?) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 04:43:02 EDT)
Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections Matthew S. Hallacy (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 08:39:17 EDT)
Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections Nathan E Norman (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 08:20:28 EDT)
Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections Omachonu Ogali (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 10:41:56 EDT)
Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections Mike Tancsa (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 10:50:55 EDT)
RE: bgp as-path info Truman, Michelle, RTSLS (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 11:15:42 EDT)
RE: bgp as-path info Ejay Hire (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 11:21:42 EDT)
Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections Matthew S. Hallacy (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 11:45:26 EDT)
Anyone here from Earthlink? chuck goolsbee (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 11:51:37 EDT)
Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections Nathan E Norman (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 11:06:12 EDT)
Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections Nathan E Norman (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 11:12:16 EDT)
Cisco Service Provider code - Any good? Jason Frisvold (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 13:48:14 EDT)
Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections Roland Perry (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:05:43 EDT)
Distributed sniffer products Austad, Jay (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:07:48 EDT)
Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections Matthew S. Hallacy (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:16:55 EDT)
Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections Omachonu Ogali (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:21:53 EDT)
Re: Distributed sniffer products Joel Jaeggli (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:21:45 EDT)
Re: Distributed sniffer products George Bakos (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:21:22 EDT)
RE: Distributed sniffer products Luke Starrett (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:26:47 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Johannes Ullrich (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:33:20 EDT)
Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections Mike Tancsa (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:40:46 EDT)
NANOG 29 (Chicago) Meeting Information Carol Wadsworth (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:31:56 EDT)
Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections Chris Horry (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:40:15 EDT)
Re: Cisco Service Provider code - Any good? Peter E. Fry (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:42:02 EDT)
Re: Distributed sniffer products Owen DeLong (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:50:01 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Sean Donelan (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:51:29 EDT)
RE: What do you want your ISP to block today? Matthew Kaufman (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:53:10 EDT)
RE: Distributed sniffer products Owen DeLong (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:54:25 EDT)
Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections Chris Lewis (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:01:06 EDT)
RE: Distributed sniffer products Luke Starrett (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:05:06 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Vinny Abello (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:05:14 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Johannes Ullrich (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:11:04 EDT)
RE: Distributed sniffer products Owen DeLong (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:07:26 EDT)
RE: What do you want your ISP to block today? Johannes Ullrich (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:12:08 EDT)
Re: Cisco Service Provider code - Any good? Peter E. Fry (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:17:17 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? William Devine, II (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:14:59 EDT)
Re: Distributed sniffer products ravi pina (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:22:55 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Petri Helenius (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:24:58 EDT)
RE: Distributed sniffer products Joel Jaeggli (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:28:51 EDT)
RE: Distributed sniffer products Luke Starrett (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:33:08 EDT)
Re: Distributed sniffer products Larry Rosenman (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:39:50 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Johannes Ullrich (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:25:44 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Owen DeLong (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:57:05 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Johannes Ullrich (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:57:16 EDT)
Re: Distributed sniffer products Dominic J. Eidson (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:58:46 EDT)
Re: Distributed sniffer products Owen DeLong (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:01:38 EDT)
RE: Distributed sniffer products (no name) (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:01:52 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Owen DeLong (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:06:32 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Petri Helenius (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:09:38 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (no name) (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:28:08 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Johannes Ullrich (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:16:09 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (no name) (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:31:03 EDT)
Re: Distributed sniffer products - (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:22:54 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Johannes Ullrich (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:27:04 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? [OT] Gabriel (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:27:58 EDT)
RE: Distributed sniffer products Braun, Mike (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:32:24 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Christopher L. Morrow (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:44:27 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Petri Helenius (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:52:16 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Johannes Ullrich (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:56:10 EDT)
Re: On the back of other 'security' posts.... Scott Francis (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 17:07:43 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Randy Bush (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 17:20:00 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Rob Thomas (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 17:30:35 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Gerardo Gregory (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 17:28:23 EDT)
RE: What do you want your ISP to block today? David Schwartz (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 18:41:03 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Petr Swedock (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 19:25:08 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Johannes Ullrich (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 19:51:52 EDT)
ethernet-based temperature sensors matthew zeier (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 20:17:48 EDT)
CalPOP contact? HTTP CONNECT scanning Jeroen Massar (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 20:17:52 EDT)
Re: Anyone here from Earthlink? chuck goolsbee (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 21:03:34 EDT)
What were we saying about edge filtering? Matthew Sullivan (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 01:46:46 EDT)
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Rob Thomas (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 02:15:31 EDT)
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Christopher L. Morrow (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 02:37:57 EDT)
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Jared Mauch (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 03:25:28 EDT)
Re: ethernet-based temperature sensors (no name) (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 04:49:02 EDT)
Re: ethernet-based temperature sensors David Lesher (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 07:59:51 EDT)
AOL people on list? Drew Weaver (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 10:22:17 EDT)
RE: ethernet-based temperature sensors Bob German (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 10:06:08 EDT)
Re: ethernet-based temperature sensors Ian Mason (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 10:11:35 EDT)
Real network failure causes Was: What do you want your ISP to block today? Ian Mason (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 09:59:09 EDT)
Re: Distributed sniffer products Greg Maxwell (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 10:43:11 EDT)
Re: Real network failure causes Was: What do you want your ISP to block today? Joe Abley (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 10:56:55 EDT)
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Gerardo Gregory (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 10:48:43 EDT)
Re: ethernet-based temperature sensors Scott McGrath (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:03:25 EDT)
Address for making BGP changes w/ Qwest? Temkin, David (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:05:10 EDT)
BMITU Fisher, Shawn (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:02:32 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Jack Bates (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:15:23 EDT)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? Jack Bates (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:20:55 EDT)
Re: ethernet-based temperature sensors Bill Owens (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:26:00 EDT)
Re: Address for making BGP changes w/ Qwest? Gerardo Gregory (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:18:49 EDT)
RE: Address for making BGP changes w/ Qwest? Joel Perez (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:28:45 EDT)
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Jack Bates (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:30:04 EDT)
Re: BMITU Jack Bates (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:32:23 EDT)
RE: Distributed sniffer products Dwight Ringdahl (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:42:07 EDT)
RE: BMITU Fisher, Shawn (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:47:13 EDT)
Re: BMITU Joel Rowbottom (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:53:19 EDT)
Atlanta Internet exchange Michael Lucking (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 12:10:14 EDT)
RE: ethernet-based temperature sensors Neil Ronketti (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 12:16:06 EDT)
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Paul Vixie (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 12:40:30 EDT)
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Christopher L. Morrow (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 12:52:53 EDT)
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Owen DeLong (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 12:51:05 EDT)
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Rob Thomas (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 12:56:36 EDT)
RE: BMITU Fisher, Shawn (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 13:09:25 EDT)
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Sean Donelan (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 13:14:54 EDT)
Re: BMITU Robert Boyle (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 13:36:53 EDT)
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Adam Debus (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 13:34:35 EDT)
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Petri Helenius (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 13:55:34 EDT)
RE: BMITU Austad, Jay (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 14:22:57 EDT)
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Jack Bates (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 14:33:43 EDT)
Re: BMITU Ray Wong (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 14:58:36 EDT)
Re: Address for making BGP changes w/ Qwest? Chris Woodfield (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 15:59:01 EDT)
RR /m (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 16:11:35 EDT)
Re: ethernet-based temperature sensors Spencer Wood (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 16:21:13 EDT)
Re: BMITU Robert Boyle (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 17:26:15 EDT)
Re: CalPOP contact? HTTP CONNECT scanning Kai Schlichting (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 17:29:17 EDT)
Re: BMITU Vadim Antonov (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 17:54:41 EDT)
Re: CalPOP contact? HTTP CONNECT scanning Will Yardley (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 17:55:44 EDT)
Re: BMITU Robert Boyle (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 18:20:14 EDT)
roadrunner. Micah McNelly (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 18:25:01 EDT)
Re: CalPOP contact? HTTP CONNECT scanning Patrick (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 20:34:29 EDT)
cox.net/cox-internet.com people here? Marius Strom (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 21:15:09 EDT)
Re: ethernet-based temperature sensors David Lesher (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 21:34:37 EDT)
Earthquake in the East Bay Lou Katz (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 22:02:39 EDT)
More universities take action to block unpatched/infected computers Sean Donelan (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 23:09:03 EDT)
Re: Earthquake in the East Bay George William Herbert (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 23:45:27 EDT)
FBI investigating fibercut in Washington State Sean Donelan (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 00:34:02 EDT)
Re: More universities take action to block unpatched/infected computers Matthew Sullivan (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 01:49:39 EDT)
RE: What were we saying about edge filtering? Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 02:46:21 EDT)
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 04:28:44 EDT)
The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 08:00:00 EDT)
Important changes to the .org tld today. Rodney Joffe (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 09:03:15 EDT)
Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. Neil J. McRae (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 09:13:51 EDT)
Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. Mark Vevers (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 09:24:05 EDT)
Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. Neil J. McRae (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 09:23:35 EDT)
Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. Rodney Joffe (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 10:01:55 EDT)
Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. Neil J. McRae (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 10:39:08 EDT)
Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. ren (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 10:50:51 EDT)
Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. Hank Nussbacher (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 10:46:12 EDT)
Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. Neil J. McRae (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 10:55:24 EDT)
SNMP OID's for BGP monitoring Austad, Jay (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 11:23:29 EDT)
Re: SNMP OID's for BGP monitoring Jared Mauch (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 11:27:23 EDT)
RE: Important changes to the .org tld today. Jeroen Massar (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 11:37:35 EDT)
OT: Alpharetta, GA fast turnup? Daryl G. Jurbala (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 11:41:50 EDT)
ChoiceOne issues today? Bob German (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 12:11:57 EDT)
Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. Rodney Joffe (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 12:30:01 EDT)
FW: Important changes to the .org tld today. Bruce Beckwith (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 12:43:07 EDT)
Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. David Diaz (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 12:49:50 EDT)
OT: Fiber or DS-3 access in Morgantown, West Virginia Michael K. Smith (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 12:50:42 EDT)
RE: SNMP OID's for BGP monitoring Austad, Jay (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 13:34:16 EDT)
RE: SNMP OID's for BGP monitoring Martin J. Levy (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 13:58:25 EDT)
RE: BMITU Robert Bridgham (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 14:23:37 EDT)
zebra server redundancy Steve Francis (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 14:28:34 EDT)
Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. Dan Hollis (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 14:29:29 EDT)
Re: zebra server redundancy (no name) (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 13:33:59 EDT)
Re: zebra server redundancy Haesu (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 15:02:52 EDT)
A web interface to check the consistency of RPSL policies Olivier Bonaventure (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 16:15:39 EDT)
More on the DDoS Attack Matthew Sullivan (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 18:59:35 EDT)
Re: SNMP OID's for BGP monitoring Jeff S Wheeler (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 19:19:29 EDT)
Re: More on the DDoS Attack Eric Gauthier (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 19:16:54 EDT)
Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. Doug Barton (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 19:45:39 EDT)
Re: More on the DDoS Attack Sean Donelan (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 19:54:04 EDT)
Re: More on the DDoS Attack Matthew Sullivan (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 21:15:02 EDT)
Don't forget about physical security - Australia Sean Donelan (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 02:12:45 EDT)
Re: Don't forget about physical security - Australia Matthew Sullivan (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 02:26:42 EDT)
RE: Re: CalPOP contact? HTTP CONNECT scanning] Jeroen Massar (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 06:40:17 EDT)
RE: Important changes to the .org tld today. Jeroen Massar (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 07:11:56 EDT)
Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. (no name) (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 07:38:57 EDT)
Re: More on the DDoS Attack Eric Gauthier (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 10:38:53 EDT)
RE: Re: CalPOP contact? HTTP CONNECT scanning] Jeroen Massar (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 13:14:39 EDT)
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Jack Bates (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 14:18:22 EDT)
AOL Postmaster contact? Eric Whitehill (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 15:35:53 EDT)
Re: BMITU Jack Bates (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 16:52:47 EDT)
RE: What were we saying about edge filtering? Terry Baranski (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 17:54:13 EDT)
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Sean Donelan (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 21:44:32 EDT)
RE: BMITU McBurnett, Jim (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 21:47:55 EDT)
RE: BMITU Michael Loftis (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 22:00:09 EDT)
Re: BMITU Jim Shankland (Sun Sep 07 2003 - 01:11:41 EDT)
Re: BMITU (no name) (Sun Sep 07 2003 - 01:46:40 EDT)
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Petri Helenius (Sun Sep 07 2003 - 05:45:15 EDT)
Qwest.Net/USWest.Net SWIP Contact for 63.224.0.0/13? Andy Ellifson (Sun Sep 07 2003 - 13:46:12 EDT)
Weekly lamer report Rob Thomas (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 06:29:49 EDT)
Re: Weekly lamer report Mehmet Akcin (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 09:43:13 EDT)
Re: Weekly lamer report Damian Gerow (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 10:33:03 EDT)
Re: Weekly lamer report Mehmet Akcin (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 10:45:20 EDT)
Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (no name) (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 12:01:51 EDT)
Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (no name) (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 12:10:07 EDT)
Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows Niels Bakker (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 12:59:25 EDT)
Roll call, custom IPG support Adam Rothschild (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 13:11:55 EDT)
wire rate filtering and policy routing John Payne (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 13:20:24 EDT)
Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows Ray Wong (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 13:32:42 EDT)
Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows Sean Donelan (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 13:35:41 EDT)
Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows Niels Bakker (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 13:37:40 EDT)
Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows Sean Donelan (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 13:40:01 EDT)
Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows Ray Wong (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 13:55:14 EDT)
Re: wire rate filtering and policy routing (no name) (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 14:54:47 EDT)
Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? William Devine, II (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 14:56:10 EDT)
RE: Don't forget about physical security - Australia St. Clair, James (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 15:00:29 EDT)
Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? Jared Mauch (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 15:03:19 EDT)
Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows Jack Bates (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 15:16:34 EDT)
Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? Jared Mauch (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 15:34:45 EDT)
Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 15:58:25 EDT)
Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? Kai Schlichting (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:06:50 EDT)
dns.exe virus? Christopher J. Wolff (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:10:09 EDT)
Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? Randy Bush (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:15:46 EDT)
Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? Mark Kasten (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:27:01 EDT)
RE: dns.exe virus? Ken Budd (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:35:08 EDT)
Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? Jason Frisvold (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:39:39 EDT)
"Free" cleaning tools for worms Sean Donelan (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:46:19 EDT)
Re: dns.exe virus? Chris Lewis (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:52:07 EDT)
RE: dns.exe virus? Christopher J. Wolff (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:52:41 EDT)
RE: dns.exe virus? Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:55:31 EDT)
Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? William Devine, II (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:59:17 EDT)
Re: dns.exe virus? Chris Lewis (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 17:30:28 EDT)
Re: dns.exe virus? (no name) (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 17:36:47 EDT)
Re: dns.exe virus? Richard Cox (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 18:10:16 EDT)
arin.net DNS problems Kai Schlichting (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 18:41:54 EDT)
RE: dns.exe virus? Christopher J. Wolff (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 19:10:36 EDT)
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (no name) (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 22:13:41 EDT)
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (no name) (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 22:37:18 EDT)
Cisco ONS 15454 Password Recovery Matthew Crocker (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 23:04:56 EDT)
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? Sean Donelan (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 23:23:48 EDT)
OT: converting 100MB to OC-3 POS Gil Levi (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 05:35:51 EDT)
Cogentco/PSI BGP Admin around ? Jan Czmok (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 05:24:03 EDT)
Re: Fun new policy at AOL (no name) (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 06:39:24 EDT)
Re: OT: converting 100MB to OC-3 POS Andy Walden (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 08:26:46 EDT)
Re: OT: converting 100MB to OC-3 POS Joe Abley (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 07:45:39 EDT)
Proxy posting: Worldcom DS3 hub down ? Jan Czmok (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 09:16:33 EDT)
cef/process switching problem Austad, Jay (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 11:07:40 EDT)
Re: cef/process switching problem Jason Frisvold (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 11:24:14 EDT)
RE: cef/process switching problem Austad, Jay (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 11:33:54 EDT)
Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (no name) (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 11:45:03 EDT)
Networks dropping all ICMP Andrew Staples (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 11:47:21 EDT)
Re: cef/process switching problem Rodney Dunn (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 12:10:42 EDT)
Re: OT: converting 100MB to OC-3 POS Henry Linneweh (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 13:42:58 EDT)
Re: Networks dropping all ICMP Greg Maxwell (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 13:28:05 EDT)
Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows Petri Helenius (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 14:48:20 EDT)
Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows Petri Helenius (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 14:51:41 EDT)
Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows Jack Bates (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 15:12:15 EDT)
Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows Petri Helenius (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 15:21:59 EDT)
paging AS226 : 63/8 does not belong to you Kai Schlichting (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 16:20:18 EDT)
Re: paging AS226 : 63/8 does not belong to you (no name) (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 16:31:05 EDT)
Dynamic Internet Maps based on BGP table / AS_PATH H. Michael Smith, Jr. (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 17:02:27 EDT)
Re: Dynamic Internet Maps based on BGP table / AS_PATH Mehmet Akcin (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 17:09:01 EDT)
RE: Dynamic Internet Maps based on BGP table / AS_PATH Mike Damm (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 18:35:00 EDT)
Re: Dynamic Internet Maps based on BGP table / AS_PATH Rachael Treu (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 19:49:04 EDT)
Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? Ian Mason (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 19:33:52 EDT)
Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? Randy Bush (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 19:52:29 EDT)
Large DMZ Security Designs ? tad pedley (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 23:49:38 EDT)
(Slightly OT) Bandwidth in Belize Marius Strom (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 00:41:56 EDT)
MPLS over Multilink PPP or Multilink Frame Relay Wayne Bogan (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 00:52:24 EDT)
Re: (Slightly OT) Bandwidth in Belize David Lesher (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 00:54:26 EDT)
Re: (Slightly OT) Bandwidth in Belize Lyndon Nerenberg (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 01:28:54 EDT)
Re: (Slightly OT) Bandwidth in Belize Marius Strom (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 01:31:44 EDT)
Re: (Slightly OT) Bandwidth in Belize Marius Strom (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 01:32:09 EDT)
Re: Dynamic Internet Maps based on BGP table / AS_PATH Daniel Karrenberg (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 03:30:26 EDT)
Re: Dynamic Internet Maps based on BGP table / AS_PATH Daniel Karrenberg (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 03:33:37 EDT)
Fibertech Networks Contact Robert Blayzor (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 10:36:12 EDT)
[resend] OT: operators script writers' experience wanted Eliot Lear (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 11:01:13 EDT)
SoBig volume way down (no name) (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 14:03:03 EDT)
RE: cef/process switching problem Michel Py (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 14:08:25 EDT)
Re: SoBig volume way down Joe Boyce (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 14:21:41 EDT)
RE: SoBig volume way down Vachon, Scott (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 14:12:07 EDT)
ISS Security Brief: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Microsoft RPC Service Ingevaldson, Dan (ISS Atlanta) (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 14:35:47 EDT)
Re: SoBig volume way down Regis M. Donovan (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 15:19:55 EDT)
TnT ethernet card fix? Drew Weaver (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 16:46:04 EDT)
RE: TnT ethernet card fix? Geo. (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 16:40:27 EDT)
Re: Max TNT ping thing Andy Walden (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 17:36:36 EDT)
Re: TnT ethernet card fix? Andy Johnson (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 16:51:17 EDT)
Cisco IOS Failure due to Virus Richard J.Sears (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 22:58:38 EDT)
Re: Cisco IOS Failure due to Virus Robert Blayzor (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 23:17:01 EDT)
Re: Cisco IOS Failure due to Virus Richard J.Sears (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 00:26:20 EDT)
Some very strange network behaviors Christopher Bird (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 00:39:25 EDT)
RE: Cisco IOS Failure due to Virus Niaz, Wajahat (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 01:51:14 EDT)
Migrating DSL Agg from Redback to Cisco Nick A Montante (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 04:57:10 EDT)
Re: Cisco IOS Failure due to Virus Stephen J. Wilcox (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 06:03:55 EDT)
Re: Some very strange network behaviors Stephen J. Wilcox (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 06:16:11 EDT)
ISS X-Force MS03-039 Free Scanner Ingevaldson, Dan (ISS Atlanta) (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 08:53:46 EDT)
Re: Some very strange network behaviors Mike Lewinski (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 09:20:22 EDT)
157.112.0.0/16 ARIN info updated, AT&T still announcing /16 Kai Schlichting (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 11:52:48 EDT)
Re: 157.112.0.0/16 ARIN info updated, AT&T still announcing /16 John Payne (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 12:32:58 EDT)
Re: 157.112.0.0/16 ARIN info updated, AT&T still announcing /16 Will Yardley (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 12:36:36 EDT)
Re: 157.112.0.0/16 ARIN info updated, AT&T still announcing /16 Richard Cox (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 13:01:47 EDT)
Re: 157.112.0.0/16 ARIN info updated, AT&T still announcing /16 Dan Hollis (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 14:18:20 EDT)
Re: 157.112.0.0/16 ARIN info updated, AT&T still announcing /16 Chris Lewis (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 15:13:39 EDT)
Re: Some very strange network behaviors Crist Clark (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 16:35:37 EDT)
Re: Some very strange network behaviors Gregory Hicks (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 17:30:42 EDT)
Alert to Phone/Pager System Allan Liska (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 17:45:43 EDT)
Re: Some very strange network behaviors Crist Clark (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 17:49:56 EDT)
Re: Some very strange network behaviors Ray Wong (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 18:15:41 EDT)
Re: Alert to Phone/Pager System Shon Elliott (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 18:39:40 EDT)
Re[2]: Alert to Phone/Pager System Allan Liska (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 18:42:38 EDT)
RE: ISS X-Force MS03-039 Free Scanner Ingevaldson, Dan (ISS Atlanta) (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 18:45:48 EDT)
RE: Alert to Phone/Pager System (no name) (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 21:55:30 EDT)
mpls provisioning Scylla Malengase (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 22:07:35 EDT)
GBLX contact? Ray Bellis (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 06:17:45 EDT)
Re: GBLX contact? Ray Bellis (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 06:53:42 EDT)
Re: Cisco IOS Failure due to Virus Petri Helenius (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 07:41:34 EDT)
The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 08:00:00 EDT)
Re: Cisco IOS Failure due to Virus Stephen J. Wilcox (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 08:56:55 EDT)
Re: Alert to Phone/Pager System Todd Christell (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 09:56:54 EDT)
New prefix Stefan Baltus (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 10:56:24 EDT)
Re: New prefix Mike Tancsa (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 11:14:23 EDT)
Re: New prefix Cliff Albert (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 11:18:55 EDT)
92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem Richard J.Sears (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 13:42:58 EDT)
Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem Chris Adams (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 13:52:58 EDT)
Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem Steven M. Bellovin (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 14:16:41 EDT)
Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem Chris Adams (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 14:32:43 EDT)
Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem William Devine, II (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 14:39:47 EDT)
Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem Richard J.Sears (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 14:41:19 EDT)
Re: New prefix Mark (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 14:45:19 EDT)
Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem Chris Adams (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 14:47:32 EDT)
Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem james (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 14:48:41 EDT)
Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem Richard J.Sears (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 14:49:08 EDT)
Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem Steve Carter (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 15:07:36 EDT)
Cyber World Internet Services Hermann Wecke (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 15:13:09 EDT)
Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (no name) (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 16:05:03 EDT)
Cisco IOS 12.3(2)T1 and warm-reload Timo Mohre (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 16:34:00 EDT)
Re: More on the DDoS Attack Eric Gauthier (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 18:30:01 EDT)
Cisco introduced 'warm' reload... Pascal Gloor (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 06:19:46 EDT)
Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem Mark Vevers (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 09:13:19 EDT)
Re: Cisco introduced 'warm' reload... Rodney Dunn (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 10:34:08 EDT)
Re: More on the DDoS Attack Jack Bates (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 11:41:27 EDT)
RE: Cisco introduced 'warm' reload... Michel Py (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 15:01:25 EDT)
Re: Cisco introduced 'warm' reload... Rodney Dunn (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 18:54:57 EDT)
Rumor: Microsoft preparing a new patch/service pack CD Sean Donelan (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 19:32:23 EDT)
RE: Cisco introduced 'warm' reload... Michel Py (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 23:11:52 EDT)
Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem (no name) (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 23:17:39 EDT)
RE: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem John Souvestre (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 23:53:14 EDT)
MIT still has over 900 network drops disabled Sean Donelan (Sun Sep 14 2003 - 01:55:18 EDT)
Sabotage not backhoes: More cable cuts Sean Donelan (Sun Sep 14 2003 - 02:25:49 EDT)
DS1 Question Dennis Dayman (Sun Sep 14 2003 - 14:32:55 EDT)
Re: Sabotage not backhoes: More cable cuts George William Herbert (Sun Sep 14 2003 - 17:10:33 EDT)
Re: Cisco introduced 'warm' reload... Rodney Dunn (Sun Sep 14 2003 - 18:54:28 EDT)
Re: Cisco introduced 'warm' reload... Rodney Dunn (Sun Sep 14 2003 - 21:13:29 EDT)
Microsoft announces new ways to bypass security controls Sean Donelan (Sun Sep 14 2003 - 22:03:32 EDT)
Re: Microsoft announces new ways to bypass security controls Mans Nilsson (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 03:22:02 EDT)
Weekly lamer report Rob Thomas (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 07:32:28 EDT)
Re: Microsoft announces new ways to bypass security controls Daniel Senie (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 10:40:14 EDT)
Re: Microsoft announces new ways to bypass security controls David Lesher (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 11:32:05 EDT)
Need help with Ex-Pat project Douglas S. Peeples (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 11:55:15 EDT)
Detroit Area (no name) (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 13:07:53 EDT)
pathchar servers Chistos Xenofontas Dimitropoulos (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 02:41:53 EDT)
RE: Cisco IOS Failure due to Virus Mark Segal (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 13:49:52 EDT)
RE: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem Mark Segal (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 13:59:22 EDT)
list thoughts on "unsupported" hardware? Ray Wong (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 15:06:51 EDT)
RE: list thoughts on "unsupported" hardware? Austad, Jay (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 15:33:28 EDT)
RE: Cisco IOS Failure due to Virus Mark Segal (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 15:33:36 EDT)
Re: list thoughts on "unsupported" hardware? Ray (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 15:39:46 EDT)
Internetwork smarTest Dean Bogdanovic (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 17:36:31 EDT)
Earthlink Connectivity? Brian Boles (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 17:36:51 EDT)
What *are* they smoking? Niels Bakker (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 18:56:57 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Tim Wilde (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:02:51 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? George William Herbert (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:11:40 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Chris Adams (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:10:46 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Richard A Steenbergen (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:15:29 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Michael K. Smith (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:16:07 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Matthew Crocker (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:17:59 EDT)
RE: What *are* they smoking? Jeroen Massar (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:18:26 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Chris Adams (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:24:24 EDT)
Change to .com/.net behavior Matt Larson (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:24:29 EDT)
RE: What *are* they smoking? Deepak Jain (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:30:53 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Mark Vallar (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:30:47 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Patrick W. Gilmore (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:34:36 EDT)
RE: What *are* they smoking? ken emery (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:35:36 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Christopher X. Candreva (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:35:08 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Patrick W. Gilmore (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:40:33 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Matthew S. Hallacy (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:45:08 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Daniel Roesen (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:45:19 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Chris Adams (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:54:00 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? (no name) (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 17:14:36 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Christopher X. Candreva (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:56:01 EDT)
RE: What *are* they smoking? Jeff S Wheeler (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:58:02 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Vadim Antonov (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:58:41 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior George William Herbert (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:04:03 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Marc Slemko (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:00:24 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Christopher X. Candreva (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:10:04 EDT)
RE: What *are* they smoking? Jeroen Massar (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:13:48 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Haesu (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:16:28 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Michael Tokarev (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:24:44 EDT)
RE: What *are* they smoking? Adam 'Starblazer' Romberg (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:24:29 EDT)
RE: What *are* they smoking? Johnny Eriksson (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:27:22 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Roy (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:29:43 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Adam 'Starblazer' Romberg (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:28:51 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Simon Lyall (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:37:02 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Alex Lambert (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:40:14 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Jared Mauch (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:38:05 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Adam 'Starblazer' Romberg (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:39:20 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Jay Hennigan (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:39:18 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Michael Tokarev (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:41:05 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Jared Mauch (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:41:30 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Chris Adams (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:51:04 EDT)
RE: What *are* they smoking? Fred Baker (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:45:26 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Joe Maimon (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:57:35 EDT)
Re[2]: What *are* they smoking? Alex Lambert (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:59:44 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Kevin Loch (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:52:46 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Tomas Lund (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:13:49 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Alex Lambert (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:17:23 EDT)
RE: What *are* they smoking? Tomas Lund (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:16:25 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior David B Harris (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:17:16 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? David B Harris (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:17:15 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Aaron Dewell (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:21:24 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Steven M. Bellovin (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:25:29 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Wayne E. Bouchard (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:30:44 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Steve Gibbard (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:36:21 EDT)
Re: [Re: Change to .com/.net behavior] Joshua Sahala (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:50:42 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Mark Radabaugh (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:52:01 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Marc Slemko (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:56:07 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:03:11 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior David B Harris (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:09:03 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior David B Harris (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:18:19 EDT)
RE: What *are* they smoking? John Ferriby (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:20:21 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? mike harrison (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:36:19 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Dr. Jeffrey Race (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:28:19 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Greg Maxwell (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:53:17 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior wayne (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 23:11:08 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? David Lesher (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 23:18:24 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:11:12 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Matthew Sullivan (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:31:53 EDT)
Verisign's New Change and Outdate RBL's Patrick Muldoon (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:39:14 EDT)
A quick examination of the VeriSign disaster Jason Garman (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:45:05 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:46:31 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Duane Wessels (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:53:58 EDT)
Patching BIND (Re: What *are* they smoking?) E.B. Dreger (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 01:32:50 EDT)
Re: Patching BIND (Re: What *are* they smoking?) John Brown (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 01:41:28 EDT)
Re: Patching BIND (Re: What *are* they smoking?) E.B. Dreger (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 01:56:02 EDT)
Re: certified idiots Petri Helenius (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 01:57:18 EDT)
Many single letter.com/net reserved by IANA now Verisign michael (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 02:08:21 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Nathan J. Mehl (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 02:12:46 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Hank Nussbacher (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 02:50:07 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Neil J. McRae (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 03:09:07 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Mans Nilsson (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 03:27:38 EDT)
Where will Verisign stop? E.B. Dreger (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 03:38:24 EDT)
Re: change to the COM and NET TLD Neil J. McRae (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 03:40:54 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior David B Harris (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 04:08:08 EDT)
Re: change to the COM and NET TLD Rafi Sadowsky (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 04:16:49 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior George William Herbert (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 04:21:18 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Miquel van Smoorenburg (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 04:43:26 EDT)
Fwd: Re: Patching BIND (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Mark Vevers (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 05:00:54 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Karsten W. Rohrbach (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 06:03:12 EDT)
Re: change to the COM and NET TLD Karsten W. Rohrbach (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 06:18:20 EDT)
Verisign HOWTO Chris Roberts (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 06:49:54 EDT)
Re: Verisign HOWTO Kandra Nyg�rds (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 07:03:33 EDT)
Verisign changes violates RFC2821 Avleen Vig (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 07:54:40 EDT)
Re: Verisign's New Change and Outdate RBL's (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 08:41:57 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Mike Tancsa (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 09:01:02 EDT)
Re: [Re: Change to .com/.net behavior] just me (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 09:23:18 EDT)
Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack RoDent (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:02:59 EDT)
Verisign Countermeasures - BIND and djbdns patches Adam Langley (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:04:07 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Sabri Berisha (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:11:03 EDT)
Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack Richard Cox (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:18:19 EDT)
RE: What *are* they smoking? Matthew Kaufman (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:32:29 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Marius Strom (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:37:35 EDT)
Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack John Palmer (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:42:02 EDT)
Verisign's legal woes??? Roy (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:50:45 EDT)
Re: Verisign's legal woes??? michael (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:56:33 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Haesu (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:59:06 EDT)
Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack Rob Pickering (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:03:57 EDT)
Re: Verisign Countermeasures - BIND and djbdns patches Christopher X. Candreva (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:05:45 EDT)
RE: Verisign's legal woes??? John Ferriby (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:08:45 EDT)
RE: What *are* they smoking? Bruce Campbell (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:14:06 EDT)
Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack Aaron Dewell (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:21:58 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Greg Maxwell (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:23:51 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? John Palmer (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:41:39 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Mark Jeftovic (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:42:01 EDT)
Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? Keptin Komrade Dr. BobWrench III esq. (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:49:34 EDT)
Re: Verisign Countermeasures - BIND and djbdns patches bert hubert (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:59:47 EDT)
Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:59:40 EDT)
Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) William Allen Simpson (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:50:37 EDT)
blocking AS30060 William Allen Simpson (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:04:18 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Chris Adams (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:14:24 EDT)
Detroit Area (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:22:58 EDT)
Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? William Allen Simpson (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:24:29 EDT)
Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack Stephen J. Wilcox (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:28:50 EDT)
Re: blocking AS30060 Haesu (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:29:27 EDT)
Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack Stephen J. Wilcox (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:29:12 EDT)
Re: blocking AS30060 Will Yardley (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:32:09 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Eric Gauthier (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:31:19 EDT)
Re: blocking AS30060 Stephen J. Wilcox (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:40:07 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Lars Erik Gullerud (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:51:52 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:57:54 EDT)
Re: blocking AS30060 Jay Hennigan (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:58:08 EDT)
Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:00:45 EDT)
Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop Mike Damm (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:07:41 EDT)
simple way to fix Verisign DNS issues John Brown (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:05:04 EDT)
Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:08:11 EDT)
Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:17:45 EDT)
Re: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop E.B. Dreger (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:19:54 EDT)
new openssh issue Len Rose (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:20:42 EDT)
Re: simple way to fix Verisign DNS issues E.B. Dreger (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:21:05 EDT)
Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:27:08 EDT)
Re: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop bert hubert (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:30:37 EDT)
Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? Jack Bates (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:29:06 EDT)
Re: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop William Allen Simpson (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:27:50 EDT)
Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:06:44 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Rich Braun (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:07:27 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Greg Maxwell (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:01:25 EDT)
Re: new openssh issue William Allen Simpson (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:08:38 EDT)
Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack Petri Helenius (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:31:01 EDT)
Re: new openssh issue Richard A Steenbergen (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:33:03 EDT)
Re: new openssh issue (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:50:04 EDT)
RE: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop Mike Damm (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:52:19 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Damian Gerow (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:54:38 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Hank Nussbacher (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:48:43 EDT)
RE: new openssh issue Ingevaldson, Dan (ISS Atlanta) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:00:57 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Robert A. Hayden (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:07:08 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) David B Harris (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:05:52 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Dan Hollis (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:09:12 EDT)
Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:18:58 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Aaron Hopkins (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:19:21 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) John Neiberger (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:17:53 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Mike Lewinski (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:24:45 EDT)
Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) John Neiberger (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:27:23 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Ben Crosby (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:29:27 EDT)
RE: new openssh issue Ingevaldson, Dan (ISS Atlanta) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:35:33 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:00:04 EDT)
Vote early... Christopher X. Candreva (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:01:19 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Ben Browning (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:02:48 EDT)
Eureka/GGN Listening? Drew Linsalata (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:07:44 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Christopher X. Candreva (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:21:33 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Damian Gerow (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:26:28 EDT)
Re: new openssh issue (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:50:04 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Christopher X. Candreva (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:38:27 EDT)
Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:06:44 EDT)
IP telephony Christopher Bird (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:38:53 EDT)
Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:00:45 EDT)
Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:17:45 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:57:54 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) David B Harris (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:05:52 EDT)
Re: relays.osirusoft.com Chris Woodfield (Wed Aug 27 2003 - 13:47:31 EDT)
RE: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? Eric Germann (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:10:34 EDT)
Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? Jay Hennigan (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:09:06 EDT)
News of ISC Developing BIND Patch John Neiberger (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:07:21 EDT)
Re: What *are* they smoking? (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:22:34 EDT)
FW: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Mike Damm (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:16:38 EDT)
Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:18:30 EDT)
RE: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop Eric Germann (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:20:06 EDT)
RE: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Michel Py (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:51:00 EDT)
Re: FW: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Larry Snyder (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:59:23 EDT)
Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Haesu (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 19:04:52 EDT)
RE: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Mike Damm (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 19:17:14 EDT)
Heads up -- potential problems in 3.7, too? [Fwd: OpenSSH Security Advisory: buffer.adv] Alex Lambert (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 19:37:50 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Ray Wong (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 19:41:34 EDT)
NANOG29 Topics Susan Harris (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 20:45:26 EDT)
Re: Heads up -- potential problems in 3.7, too? [Fwd: OpenSSH Security Advisory: buffer.adv] (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 20:58:13 EDT)
Re: Heads up -- potential problems in 3.7, too? [Fwd: OpenSSH Security Advisory: buffer.adv] ken emery (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 21:00:42 EDT)
Re: Heads up -- potential problems in 3.7, too? [Fwd: OpenSSH Security Advisory: buffer.adv] Jeff Wasilko (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 21:03:38 EDT)
Re: Heads up -- potential problems in 3.7, too? [Fwd: OpenSSH Security Advisory: buffer.adv] E.B. Dreger (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 21:04:44 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) David Lesher (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 21:20:08 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) E.B. Dreger (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 21:27:13 EDT)
Re: Heads up -- potential problems in 3.7, too? [Fwd: OpenSSH Security Advisory: buffer.adv] (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 22:48:16 EDT)
Re: Heads up -- potential problems in 3.7, too? [Fwd: OpenSSH Security Advisory: buffer.adv] Jared Mauch (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 23:16:18 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch William Allen Simpson (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 23:37:20 EDT)
root server owners? William Allen Simpson (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:14:40 EDT)
bind patch? (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:15:43 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:20:29 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:23:32 EDT)
Re: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:27:05 EDT)
Re: root server owners? Allan Liska (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:27:43 EDT)
Re: IP telephony Henry Linneweh (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:28:44 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Mike Tancsa (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:38:14 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:36:27 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch John Brown (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:41:01 EDT)
Re: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop (no name) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:44:13 EDT)
Neeed a new RFC? Roy (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:46:55 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Sean Donelan (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:48:09 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (no name) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:46:31 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 22:08:25 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Mike Tancsa (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:55:59 EDT)
Charlotte, NC Services Wanted Ray Burkholder (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:52:24 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Sean Donelan (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:50:29 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:54:17 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 01:07:04 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 01:13:45 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Hank Nussbacher (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 02:23:40 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) E.B. Dreger (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 01:37:49 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Declan McCullagh (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 02:32:40 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Sean Donelan (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 01:39:56 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) John Brown (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 02:13:24 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 02:33:36 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Daniel Karrenberg (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 03:26:36 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Vadim Antonov (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 03:30:30 EDT)
Re: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop Daniel Karrenberg (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 03:31:26 EDT)
Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack M�ns Nilsson (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 03:31:23 EDT)
Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack Petri Helenius (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 03:45:34 EDT)
ISC Patches Peter Losher (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 04:40:29 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) bert hubert (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 05:11:27 EDT)
Re: Verisign changes violates RFC2821, and spam implications Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 05:40:29 EDT)
Re: IP telephony Petri Helenius (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 05:41:46 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Vadim Antonov (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 05:50:51 EDT)
Re: Verisign changes violates RFC2821, and spam implications Andy Smith (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 06:07:28 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (no name) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 06:17:20 EDT)
Re: IP telephony Iljitsch van Beijnum (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 06:28:37 EDT)
Re: public resolver (was: bind patch? (Re: What *are* they smoking?)) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 06:57:16 EDT)
RE: IP telephony - Thank you all for insights and answers - no new content in message, but I wanted to acknowledge all who took the time! Christopher Bird (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 07:33:58 EDT)
Re: Verisign changes violates RFC2821, and spam implications Stephen J. Wilcox (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 07:36:41 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Simon Waters (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 07:53:58 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Iljitsch van Beijnum (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 08:10:32 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch David Lesher (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 08:55:31 EDT)
Re: root server owners? William Allen Simpson (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 08:33:05 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Christopher X. Candreva (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 09:20:27 EDT)
Re: public resolver Doron Shikmoni (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 09:26:01 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Todd Vierling (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 09:27:13 EDT)
Re: ISC Patches Todd Vierling (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 09:33:02 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Stefan Baltus (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 09:35:31 EDT)
Re: Verisign changes violates RFC2821, and spam implications Bruce Campbell (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 09:45:30 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) bert hubert (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 10:17:25 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 10:28:10 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 10:33:45 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Mathias K�rber (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 10:35:40 EDT)
Re: ISC Patches Chris Adams (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 10:35:53 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Jack Bates (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 10:58:40 EDT)
Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? Jack Bates (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 11:09:30 EDT)
Re: ISC Patches William Allen Simpson (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 10:56:31 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Aaron Dewell (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 11:18:15 EDT)
OT - fiber optic power meter for 1383 nm Bill Owens (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 11:36:10 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch David G. Andersen (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 11:47:20 EDT)
<OT> Mad DNS Disease Martin Hepworth (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 11:46:12 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Jack Bates (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 12:00:50 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Aaron Dewell (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 12:19:49 EDT)
Re: [Re: Change to .com/.net behavior] E.B. Dreger (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 12:38:23 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Jack Bates (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 12:38:34 EDT)
RE: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop Mike Damm (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 12:41:13 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Justin Shore (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:12:53 EDT)
Re: new openssh issue Avleen Vig (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:26:57 EDT)
Re: public resolver (was: bind patch? (Re: What *are* they smoking?)) Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:32:07 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:34:08 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior William Devine, II (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:45:09 EDT)
BIND 9 (Re: ISC Patches) Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:46:19 EDT)
RE: Change to .com/.net behavior David Schwartz (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:50:38 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:55:32 EDT)
Re: Sabotage not backhoes: More cable cuts Justin Shore (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:53:25 EDT)
Re: BIND 9 (Re: ISC Patches) Todd Vierling (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:56:47 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Kandra Nyg�rds (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:06:51 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (no name) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:13:24 EDT)
Now a Sendmail issue as well (was Re: new openssh issue) Mike Tancsa (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:17:39 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Petri Helenius (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:15:30 EDT)
IP issues with .com/.net change? Alex Kamantauskas (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:17:08 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Kandra Nyg�rds (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:22:39 EDT)
RE: new openssh issue Buhrmaster, Gary (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:23:40 EDT)
Re: BIND 9 (Re: ISC Patches) Len Sassaman (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:25:40 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior William Devine, II (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:29:19 EDT)
Re: IP issues with .com/.net change? Jack Bates (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:41:13 EDT)
RE: Change to .com/.net behavior Sam Hayes Merritt, III (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:53:34 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior John Palmer (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:07:07 EDT)
anyone from telia online Peter Galbavy (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:14:02 EDT)
RE: Change to .com/.net behavior David Schwartz (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:30:18 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Ross Wm. Rader (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:37:30 EDT)
Re: IP issues with .com/.net change? Len Sassaman (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:39:35 EDT)
Re: new openssh issue (no name) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:41:52 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Joe Maimon (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:43:17 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior John Palmer (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:43:06 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (no name) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:46:39 EDT)
Re: IP issues with .com/.net change? Richard Cox (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:51:37 EDT)
BGP issues Bret Baptist (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:04:15 EDT)
ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Matthew Richardson (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 17:04:06 EDT)
Re: Where will Verisign stop? E.B. Dreger (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:07:11 EDT)
RE: Sabotage not backhoes: More cable cuts Justin Shore (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:13:01 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Andy Dills (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:23:16 EDT)
Re: BGP issues Iljitsch van Beijnum (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:38:12 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:52:46 EDT)
ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Jerry Eyers (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:57:13 EDT)
FW: Sendmail 8.12.9 prescan bug (a new one) [CAN-2003-0694] Avery Buffington (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 17:06:46 EDT)
Re: IP issues with .com/.net change? Len Sassaman (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 17:08:19 EDT)
Re: IP issues with .com/.net change? Len Sassaman (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 17:28:07 EDT)
Re: BGP issues Peter E. Fry (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 17:29:31 EDT)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 17:49:39 EDT)
Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Petri Helenius (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 17:50:18 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 18:03:11 EDT)
Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign E.B. Dreger (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 18:05:04 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Vadim Antonov (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 18:17:18 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Vadim Antonov (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 18:31:43 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (no name) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 18:39:27 EDT)
Worst design decisions? Matt (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 18:43:24 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch E.B. Dreger (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 18:43:48 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Vadim Antonov (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 19:13:53 EDT)
RE: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch David Schwartz (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 19:26:21 EDT)
VeriSign responds to complaints via press release Jeff Wasilko (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 19:40:56 EDT)
Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Rachael Treu (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 19:47:41 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Justin Shore (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 19:49:17 EDT)
Re: VeriSign responds to complaints via press release Haesu (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 20:01:37 EDT)
RE: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Vadim Antonov (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 20:09:52 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Aaron Dewell (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 20:19:11 EDT)
Re: VeriSign responds to complaints via press release E.B. Dreger (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 20:25:54 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:11:56 EDT)
Route failures to behosting.com Lou Katz (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:23:09 EDT)
OT: Interesting visuals. interesting message, 560 kb, 5 min to run (if you have a moment) Dr. Jeffrey Race (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:25:22 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? (no name) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:29:33 EDT)
Re: Route failures to behosting.com Brian Bruns (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:29:57 EDT)
Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (no name) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:32:10 EDT)
Re: Route failures to behosting.com Henry Yen (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:35:54 EDT)
RE: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Mike Leber (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:43:42 EDT)
RE: Worst design decisions? Shawn Solomon (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:43:59 EDT)
Re: Route failures to behosting.com Haesu (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:46:21 EDT)
RE: Route failures to behosting.com Shawn Jackson (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:51:56 EDT)
RE: Worst design decisions? Casassa, Nathan (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 22:01:11 EDT)
Re: Route failures to behosting.com Roy Bentley (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 22:09:45 EDT)
RE: Route failures to behosting.com McBurnett, Jim (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:57:28 EDT)
route to behosting.com Lou Katz (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 22:37:12 EDT)
Re: route to behosting.com Henry Yen (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 22:59:19 EDT)
Re: BGP issues Jeff S Wheeler (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 23:25:00 EDT)
Re: Route failures to behosting.com Haesu (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 23:53:13 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (no name) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 00:07:57 EDT)
Verisign suggestion Gerald (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 00:25:48 EDT)
Re: Route failures to behosting.com Lou Katz (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 00:26:28 EDT)
Re: Verisign suggestion David B Harris (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 00:36:05 EDT)
.ORG problems this evening Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 00:50:28 EDT)
Re: Verisign suggestion (no name) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:16:14 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Jared Mauch (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:22:40 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening E.B. Dreger (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:27:41 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Christopher L. Morrow (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:28:05 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Christopher L. Morrow (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:30:48 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening E.B. Dreger (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:44:25 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Rodney Joffe (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:47:45 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening John Brown (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:58:04 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Petri Helenius (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 04:29:27 EDT)
RE: Worst design decisions? (no name) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 04:40:01 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Alex Bligh (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 04:45:29 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Majdi S. Abbas (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 05:08:22 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Frank (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 05:57:17 EDT)
Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (no name) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 06:24:49 EDT)
Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (no name) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 06:42:19 EDT)
Re: public resolver (was: bind patch? (Re: What *are* they smoking?)) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 06:55:41 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 07:38:38 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 07:50:09 EDT)
Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 07:57:15 EDT)
Fw: Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Jerry Eyers (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:10:41 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Stephen J. Wilcox (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:10:00 EDT)
Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:12:26 EDT)
Re: Verisign suggestion Leo Bicknell (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:15:36 EDT)
Just had an interesting side effect of the "V" hijack... Jerry Eyers (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:21:11 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:19:01 EDT)
Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:28:07 EDT)
Re: Verisign suggestion Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:24:40 EDT)
Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:26:58 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Petri Helenius (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:38:06 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Rodney Joffe (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:42:56 EDT)
Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:40:21 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? David Lesher (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:57:11 EDT)
Re: Fw: Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Miles Fidelman (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:00:56 EDT)
Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) Stephen J. Wilcox (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:07:23 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Ryan Dobrynski (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:09:55 EDT)
Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) Stephen J. Wilcox (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:16:10 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Vinny Abello (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:18:01 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Vinny Abello (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:20:10 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening just me (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:30:38 EDT)
Re: Verisign suggestion Niels Bakker (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:33:08 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? (Cisco 4x00 rails) neal rauhauser (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 07:37:04 EDT)
RE: Worst design decisions? Daryl G. Jurbala (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:53:38 EDT)
Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:57:23 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? David Lesher (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:01:27 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:05:15 EDT)
Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) Leo Bicknell (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:05:58 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:11:26 EDT)
Virus uptick? David Lesher (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:08:22 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Brian Bruns (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:16:23 EDT)
RE: Worst design decisions? Austad, Jay (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:19:20 EDT)
Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:22:11 EDT)
Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:22:15 EDT)
Sven-Haegar Koch: Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Paul Vixie (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:23:49 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Jack Bates (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:31:27 EDT)
Re: Virus uptick? William Warren (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:45:22 EDT)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Niels Bakker (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:45:40 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? David Barak (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:46:33 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? (no name) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:57:13 EDT)
Re: Virus uptick? Scott A. McIntyre (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:01:57 EDT)
Contact from Verio Joiner, Joshua (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:05:15 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:07:10 EDT)
RE: Worst design decisions? Bob German (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:11:37 EDT)
Re: Virus uptick? David Lesher (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:10:02 EDT)
RE: Worst design decisions? Gerald (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:16:36 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Leo Bicknell (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:19:49 EDT)
yo' grammar so funny (was Re: DNS anycast considered harmful) Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:18:06 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Justin Shore (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:19:20 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? John Palmer (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:26:03 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Justin Shore (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:21:47 EDT)
RE: Worst design decisions? Colin Brown (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:42:06 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:39:17 EDT)
Re: Verisign suggestion David B Harris (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:42:26 EDT)
Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Marc MERLIN (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:27:11 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:44:23 EDT)
Re: IP issues with .com/.net change? Andy Walden (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:44:43 EDT)
Re: Virus uptick? Mike Tancsa (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:59:52 EDT)
Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign David Lesher (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:55:31 EDT)
Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign John Neiberger (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:59:27 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? John Kristoff (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:55:18 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Peter E. Fry (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:02:08 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening David Lesher (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:54:15 EDT)
Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Chris Adams (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:05:40 EDT)
RE: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Matthew Zito (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:15:59 EDT)
Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Dominic J. Eidson (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:11:12 EDT)
"Class A Data Center" Bob German (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:08:43 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? (Cisco 4x00 rails) Mark Rogaski (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:14:24 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening E.B. Dreger (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:34:52 EDT)
Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (no name) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:34:12 EDT)
Re: "Class A Data Center" (no name) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:45:03 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening E.B. Dreger (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:45:34 EDT)
New routeviews service available (Address/Prefix -> AS/ASPATH mappings) David Meyer (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:50:38 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:52:29 EDT)
RE: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Gerald (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:52:11 EDT)
Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Marc MERLIN (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:01:21 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:01:18 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? E.B. Dreger (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:04:47 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening E.B. Dreger (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:17:33 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening E.B. Dreger (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:15:46 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Petri Helenius (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:15:49 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Dominic J. Eidson (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:20:06 EDT)
videotron contact Todd Mitchell - lists (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:30:28 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening (no name) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:29:06 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Stephen J. Wilcox (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:28:51 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Brian Bruns (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:28:43 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Keptin Komrade Dr. BobWrench III esq. (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:35:41 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Ryan Tucker (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:38:18 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Keptin Komrade Dr. BobWrench III esq. (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:47:01 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening just me (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:41:41 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Aaron Dewell (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:01:15 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening (no name) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:00:53 EDT)
anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening) E.B. Dreger (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:01:07 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Nathan J. Mehl (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:11:32 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening E.B. Dreger (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:10:31 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:09:23 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening E.B. Dreger (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:20:21 EDT)
Re: anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening) E.B. Dreger (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:24:26 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:22:19 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? John Neiberger (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:29:05 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? (no name) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:39:51 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening (no name) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:36:37 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening E.B. Dreger (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:44:25 EDT)
Re: anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening) Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:38:18 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Gerald (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:49:37 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening E.B. Dreger (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:54:06 EDT)
RE: Worst design decisions? Luke Starrett (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:56:53 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Nathan Eric Norman (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:01:44 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? (no name) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:00:58 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (no name) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:10:57 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (no name) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:06:04 EDT)
Re: "Class A Data Center" Jay Hennigan (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:14:22 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Mr. James W. Laferriere (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:21:45 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Mr. James W. Laferriere (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:25:36 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch John Kristoff (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:30:23 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Scott Granados (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:37:07 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:29:52 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch David Lesher (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:36:26 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Dominic J. Eidson (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:45:28 EDT)
RE: "Class A Data Center" Bob German (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:58:31 EDT)
consider fewer posts, more substance please... ren (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 16:05:39 EDT)
RE: "Class A Data Center" (no email) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 16:19:21 EDT)
RE: Worst design decisions? Ejay Hire (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 16:19:20 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Richard Irving (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 16:23:44 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Richard Irving (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 16:42:13 EDT)
Re: "Class A Data Center" Jack Bates (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 16:55:13 EDT)
Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign George William Herbert (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 17:22:57 EDT)
RE: Worst design decisions? Charles Sprickman (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 17:29:30 EDT)
RE: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) David Schwartz (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 17:31:32 EDT)
RE: Worst design decisions? Charles Sprickman (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 17:32:13 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Crist Clark (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 17:37:19 EDT)
Rogers Cable Contact Alexander Kiwerski (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 17:51:50 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Majdi S. Abbas (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 18:02:15 EDT)
Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution Eric Germann (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 18:08:47 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Miquel van Smoorenburg (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 18:26:29 EDT)
RE: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution David Schwartz (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 18:38:12 EDT)
Re: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution Stephen J. Wilcox (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 18:51:08 EDT)
Re: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution Damian Gerow (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 18:58:13 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Ben Browning (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 18:53:44 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Matthew S. Hallacy (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 19:13:03 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 19:11:59 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Scott Granados (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 19:14:39 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? (no name) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 19:24:40 EDT)
Re: BIND 9 (Re: ISC Patches) Doug Barton (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 19:41:23 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Paul Timmins (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 20:01:08 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? John Neiberger (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:29:05 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? JC Dill (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 20:08:51 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening E.B. Dreger (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:10:31 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening E.B. Dreger (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:44:25 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:09:23 EDT)
Re: anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening) Todd Vierling (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:38:18 EDT)
let the lawsuits begin Alan Hannan (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 21:00:22 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Chris Adams (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 21:11:11 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening (no email) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:36:37 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? (no name) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 21:17:28 EDT)
RE: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution Eric Germann (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 21:16:18 EDT)
RE: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution Eric Germann (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 21:19:57 EDT)
RE: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution David Schwartz (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 22:02:06 EDT)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Chris Boyd (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 23:00:58 EDT)
Interesting interaction between Blaster worm variants and Verisign DNS change (no email) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 23:29:16 EDT)
RE: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Adam Atkinson (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 06:40:00 EDT)
site finder performance Petri Helenius (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 07:10:01 EDT)
The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 08:00:00 EDT)
RE: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution Eric Germann (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 08:01:14 EDT)
RE: Worst design decisions? Mark Borchers (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 09:35:34 EDT)
Providers removing blocks on port 135? Adam Hall (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 10:08:35 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Jack Bates (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 10:47:32 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Sean Donelan (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 10:48:32 EDT)
FW: Where to get an ASN certificate? Nine, Jason (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:02:07 EDT)
diversion... (no name) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:09:42 EDT)
Re: FW: Where to get an ASN certificate? (no name) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:11:18 EDT)
Re: FW: Where to get an ASN certificate? Joe Abley (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:18:18 EDT)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Alex Bligh (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:23:27 EDT)
RE: Interesting interaction between Blaster worm variants and Verisign DNS change (no email) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:33:15 EDT)
apathy (was Re: .ORG problems this evening) Todd Vierling (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:36:49 EDT)
RE: Where to get an ASN certificate? Nine, Jason (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:37:47 EDT)
Costs of not testing an implementation Chan, Chung Ming (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:44:44 EDT)
RE: apathy (was Re: .ORG problems this evening) Eric Germann (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:51:42 EDT)
Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen) Mark Radabaugh (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 12:03:15 EDT)
Re: Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen) Brian Bruns (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 12:40:27 EDT)
Re: apathy (was Re: .ORG problems this evening) Rodney Joffe (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 12:48:20 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Owen DeLong (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:02:52 EDT)
Re: Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen) Mr. James W. Laferriere (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:07:05 EDT)
RE: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Matthew Kaufman (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:14:43 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Christopher L. Morrow (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 19:15:26 EDT)
Re: Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen) Brian Bruns (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:20:22 EDT)
RE: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Owen DeLong (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:23:28 EDT)
RE: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Matthew Kaufman (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:32:21 EDT)
RE: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Justin Shore (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:30:42 EDT)
Re: apathy (was Re: .ORG problems this evening) Todd Vierling (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:36:41 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Leo Bicknell (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:39:13 EDT)
RE: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Owen DeLong (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:42:13 EDT)
RE: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Owen DeLong (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:49:17 EDT)
Re: Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen) Steven M. Bellovin (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:58:57 EDT)
Re: Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen) chuck goolsbee (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 14:32:07 EDT)
RE: Worst design decisions? Chris Horry (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 14:53:12 EDT)
Re: apathy (was Re: .ORG problems this evening) Richard A Steenbergen (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:04:52 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Scott Granados (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:08:33 EDT)
RE: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Mark Borchers (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:17:15 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? (no name) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:19:15 EDT)
RE: Worst design decisions? Mike Donahue (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:22:08 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Damian Gerow (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:34:16 EDT)
RE: Worst design decisions? Scott Granados (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:36:39 EDT)
RE: Worst design decisions? Shawn Jackson (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:51:07 EDT)
RE: Worst design decisions? Alex Rubenstein (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:53:04 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Jack Bates (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 16:07:51 EDT)
routing issue? (no name) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 16:15:20 EDT)
RE: Worst design decisions? John Neiberger (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 16:16:32 EDT)
Re: routing issue? Henry Yen (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 16:31:58 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? steve uurtamo (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 16:58:59 EDT)
RE: routing issue? (no name) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 17:05:04 EDT)
RE: Worst design decisions? Ron Snyder (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 18:04:17 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (no name) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 19:06:41 EDT)
Wildcards: ICANN and IAB posted their commentaries (no name) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 21:37:41 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Matt (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 22:40:18 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Matt (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 22:47:03 EDT)
Re: Wildcards: ICANN and IAB posted their commentaries Doug Barton (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 01:05:01 EDT)
Bye Snubby, hello Mail Rejector Stephen J. Wilcox (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 05:39:34 EDT)
Looking for clue at NetSOL/Verisign Matthew S. Hallacy (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 06:33:29 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? Neil J. McRae (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 07:24:15 EDT)
RE: Worst design decisions? Wojtek Zlobicki (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 09:17:34 EDT)
Re: Looking for clue at NetSOL/Verisign Robert Blayzor (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 09:29:38 EDT)
Re: Looking for clue at NetSOL/Verisign Mark Foster (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 11:07:37 EDT)
bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards) Paul Vixie (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 11:56:51 EDT)
VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Matt Larson (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 14:01:39 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Dave Stewart (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 14:16:34 EDT)
Re: bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards) Mr. James W. Laferriere (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 14:22:57 EDT)
RE: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Matthew Kaufman (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 14:25:41 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated bert hubert (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 14:27:53 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated ken emery (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 14:34:17 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated neal rauhauser (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 12:14:50 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Stephen J. Wilcox (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 14:37:58 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Niels Bakker (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 14:52:56 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated ken emery (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 15:00:53 EDT)
Verisign vs ICANN Len Rose (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 15:28:59 EDT)
Re: bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards) Paul Vixie (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 15:29:41 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Sean Donelan (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 15:36:40 EDT)
Re: Verisign vs ICANN Simon Lockhart (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 15:37:14 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Roy (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 15:39:57 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Paul Vixie (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 15:47:15 EDT)
Re: Verisign vs ICANN Len Rose (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 15:53:53 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Declan McCullagh (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 16:52:06 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Sean Donelan (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 16:01:23 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Paul Vixie (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 16:05:27 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Eric A. Hall (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 16:06:51 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Eric A. Hall (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 16:21:57 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Robert Blayzor (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 16:43:58 EDT)
When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Sean Donelan (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 16:45:09 EDT)
Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Robert Blayzor (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 17:01:02 EDT)
Re: Verisign vs ICANN Kee Hinckley (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 17:03:04 EDT)
Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Paul Vixie (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 17:13:56 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Owen DeLong (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 17:46:33 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Rob Thomas (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 17:53:23 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Owen DeLong (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 17:56:41 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Owen DeLong (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:05:08 EDT)
Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Brian Bruns (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:09:16 EDT)
Re: Verisign vs ICANN E.B. Dreger (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:13:49 EDT)
If Verisign *really* wants to help ... Lyndon Nerenberg (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:20:43 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Ray Bellis (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:22:34 EDT)
Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Robert Blayzor (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:27:26 EDT)
Re: If Verisign *really* wants to help ... Sean Donelan (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:28:47 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Margie (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:38:58 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Matthew Sullivan (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:38:00 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Andy Walden (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:36:56 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Richard Cox (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:46:40 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? David B Harris (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:51:50 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Niels Bakker (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:53:41 EDT)
Re: If Verisign *really* wants to help ... (no name) (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 16:22:26 EDT)
RE: If Verisign *really* wants to help ... Vivien M. (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:59:54 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Sean Donelan (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:01:27 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (no name) (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:12:46 EDT)
RE: If Verisign *really* wants to help ... Michael Loftis (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:13:01 EDT)
Re: Bye Snubby, hello Mail Rejector David B Harris (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:10:06 EDT)
Appreciation for Bind patches Andrew Fried (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:14:34 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Margie (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:33:15 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Ray Bellis (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:24:12 EDT)
Re: Bye Snubby, hello Mail Rejector Lyndon Nerenberg (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:27:13 EDT)
Re: Appreciation for Bind patches Paul Vixie (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:36:53 EDT)
Re: Appreciation for Bind patches Len Sassaman (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:46:04 EDT)
Re: Appreciation for Bind patches Graham Freeman (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 20:01:41 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Joe Provo (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 20:31:27 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Justin Shore (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 21:32:55 EDT)
Bind 8 and delegation only ? John Brown (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 21:49:31 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Justin Shore (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 21:53:17 EDT)
Any actual data to back up blocking Netbios ports? Sean Donelan (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 22:27:23 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (no name) (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 22:39:47 EDT)
Re: Any actual data to back up blocking Netbios ports? Sean Donelan (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 23:08:03 EDT)
Re: Appreciation for Bind patches Jim Shankland (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 23:45:44 EDT)
Re: Any actual data to back up blocking Netbios ports? Dan Hollis (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 00:12:02 EDT)
Re: Any actual data to back up blocking Netbios ports? Sean Donelan (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 00:17:22 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Avleen Vig (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 01:01:27 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Avleen Vig (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 01:07:43 EDT)
Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Henry Linneweh (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 02:23:04 EDT)
Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Jared Mauch (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 03:28:57 EDT)
Re: Verisign vs ICANN Petri Helenius (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 04:22:07 EDT)
Re: Verisign vs ICANN (no name) (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 02:28:38 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Miquel van Smoorenburg (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 05:47:15 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Stephen J. Wilcox (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 06:08:27 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Daniel Roesen (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 06:18:32 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 06:44:18 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Petri Helenius (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 08:17:38 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Petri Helenius (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 09:14:24 EDT)
Re: Worst design decisions? (no name) (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 09:50:58 EDT)
Verisign's Threat to Infrastructure Stability Curt Akin (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 10:30:27 EDT)
Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign David Lesher (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 06:44:34 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Mike Tancsa (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 10:39:16 EDT)
RE: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Mike Damm (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 10:53:19 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Stephen J. Wilcox (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 11:17:34 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated E.B. Dreger (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 12:19:15 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Eric A. Hall (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 12:28:09 EDT)
More .com/.net issues Steve Atkins (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 12:46:40 EDT)
Re: If Verisign *really* wants to help ... Owen DeLong (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 12:56:22 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Stephen J. Wilcox (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 13:00:48 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Owen DeLong (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 13:04:06 EDT)
If Verisign wants to cooperate E.B. Dreger (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 13:07:32 EDT)
Are Wildcards another Y2K? Kevin Loch (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 13:17:14 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Eric A. Hall (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 13:14:24 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Justin Shore (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 13:55:00 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Matthew S. Hallacy (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 14:02:17 EDT)
Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Paul Vixie (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 15:37:03 EDT)
Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Andy Walden (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 16:37:19 EDT)
Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Paul Vixie (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 15:49:05 EDT)
RE: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Jeroen Massar (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 16:00:56 EDT)
Re: Verisign abusing .COM/.NET monopoly, BIND releases new (fwd) (no name) (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 16:15:45 EDT)
Quantifying SiteFinder Traffic (no name) (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 16:28:25 EDT)
Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Haesu (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 16:33:40 EDT)
Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 16:45:57 EDT)
Re: If Verisign *really* wants to help ... Christopher L. Morrow (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 17:24:03 EDT)
Home Storage Area Network security Sean Donelan (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 17:58:48 EDT)
Windows updates and dial up users Sean Donelan (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 18:25:50 EDT)
Re: Home Storage Area Network security Rafi Sadowsky (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 18:27:15 EDT)
RE: Home Storage Area Network security Bob German (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 19:37:53 EDT)
Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (no name) (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 19:53:49 EDT)
Re: Home Storage Area Network security Geo. (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 20:14:42 EDT)
RE: Home Storage Area Network security Bob German (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 20:23:30 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? John Kristoff (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 21:51:05 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (no name) (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 22:00:16 EDT)
Re: Windows updates and dial up users (no name) (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 22:04:54 EDT)
RE: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Eric Germann (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 22:09:34 EDT)
Re: Home Storage Area Network security Geo. (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 22:41:20 EDT)
ICANN asks VeriSign to pull redirect service Eric Germann (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 22:42:37 EDT)
Re: ICANN asks VeriSign to pull redirect service Haesu (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 23:12:14 EDT)
Re: ICANN asks VeriSign to pull redirect service John Brown (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 23:20:32 EDT)
Operations notification manager software Pete Kruckenberg (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 00:02:24 EDT)
Re: Operations notification manager software Justin Shore (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 01:23:35 EDT)
Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Brandon Butterworth (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 03:23:46 EDT)
Riverhead or Lancope? John Obi (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 04:13:38 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (no name) (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 05:09:35 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (no name) (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 05:42:51 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Richard Cox (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 06:02:00 EDT)
Re: Windows updates and dial up users Jonathan Hunter (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 06:13:00 EDT)
Re: Windows updates and dial up users Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 06:45:13 EDT)
Re: ICANN asks VeriSign to pull redirect service Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 06:55:57 EDT)
Re: Riverhead or Lancope? Ariel Biener (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 06:58:41 EDT)
Re: Windows updates and dial up users Roy Bentley (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 07:13:15 EDT)
Re: Verisign's Threat to Infrastructure Stability Niels Bakker (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 07:14:16 EDT)
Re: Windows updates and dial up users Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 07:19:29 EDT)
Re: Windows updates and dial up users Richard Cox (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 07:41:53 EDT)
Re: Riverhead or Lancope? Michael Martin (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 07:52:00 EDT)
[Administrativia] Posting rules: are messages silently dropped? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 08:18:45 EDT)
Re: Operations notification manager software Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 08:20:02 EDT)
Re: Verisign's Threat to Infrastructure Stability (no name) (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 05:57:17 EDT)
Re: Windows updates and dial up users Jerry Eyers (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 08:38:23 EDT)
RE: Need help with Ex-Pat project Douglas S. Peeples (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 09:05:59 EDT)
Re: Operations notification manager software Damian Gerow (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 09:45:30 EDT)
Re: Windows updates and dial up users (no name) (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 11:00:51 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Jack Bates (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 11:57:10 EDT)
RE: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Mike Damm (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 13:02:59 EDT)
Re: Windows updates and dial up users Owen DeLong (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 13:02:57 EDT)
Re: Windows updates and dial up users Owen DeLong (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 13:07:45 EDT)
Re: Windows updates and dial up users Owen DeLong (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 13:11:00 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Jack Bates (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 13:14:30 EDT)
Re: Operations notification manager software Justin Shore (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 16:58:29 EDT)
ATTBI/Comcast issue Tony Varriale (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 18:13:12 EDT)
Re: ICANN asks VeriSign to pull redirect service John Dvorak (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 18:19:45 EDT)
comments on addressing futures.... (no name) (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 18:22:47 EDT)
Re: anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening) David G. Andersen (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 18:32:19 EDT)
Re: anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening) Patrick (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 18:40:57 EDT)
Re: anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening) E.B. Dreger (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 18:50:40 EDT)
Re: anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening) just me (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 19:04:18 EDT)
Go Daddy vs Verisign over Site Finder Andy Ellifson (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 19:07:13 EDT)
Re: comments on addressing futures.... John Brown (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 19:30:26 EDT)
Verisign Responds Leo Bicknell (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 21:23:07 EDT)
Verisign Responds David Lesher (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 17:43:21 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Mike Tancsa (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 21:36:38 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated George William Herbert (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 21:56:18 EDT)
ICANN Secsac message to the board Doug Barton (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 21:55:26 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Haesu (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 21:58:04 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Dave Stewart (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 23:02:45 EDT)
caida macroscopic geographic analysis of IPv6 addresses k claffy (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 00:00:04 EDT)
AS taxonomy (transit/stub, multi-single-homing) k claffy (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 00:05:15 EDT)
Cheap temperature sensors Robert Boyle (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 00:10:25 EDT)
caida annotated networking bibliography k claffy (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 00:24:15 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Dan Hollis (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 00:43:48 EDT)
Dedicated hosting / Colocation folk Mehmet Akcin (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 01:21:33 EDT)
Anybody from AT&T? Jay Greenberg (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 01:29:37 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 02:07:31 EDT)
bind 9.2.3rc3 successful William Allen Simpson (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 02:35:48 EDT)
Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful Paul Vixie (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 02:44:44 EDT)
Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful Haesu (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 02:50:50 EDT)
Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful Will Yardley (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 03:30:33 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Daniel Karrenberg (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 04:13:58 EDT)
Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful Paul Wouters (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 06:25:55 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds (no name) (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 08:34:06 EDT)
Re: Cheap temperature sensors Robert Boyle (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 08:38:16 EDT)
RE: [nanog]: Re: Cheap temperature sensors Tomas Daniska (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 08:56:39 EDT)
Re: Cheap temperature sensors Andy Walden (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 09:51:02 EDT)
Re: bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards) Mr. James W. Laferriere (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 09:08:22 EDT)
Re: ICANN asks VeriSign to pull redirect service Jack Bates (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 10:26:43 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 10:34:44 EDT)
Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful Jack Bates (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 10:44:53 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Daniel Karrenberg (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 10:51:11 EDT)
Re: Windows updates and dial up users Henry Yen (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 11:01:36 EDT)
RE: Verisign Responds Jeroen Massar (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 11:03:30 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds (no name) (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 11:43:03 EDT)
FW: ISS Security Brief: ProFTPD ASCII File Remote Compromise Vulnerability Ingevaldson, Dan (ISS Atlanta) (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 11:52:45 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Mike Tancsa (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 12:02:29 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Jack Bates (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 12:11:53 EDT)
Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful Dan Riley (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 12:40:52 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Mike Tancsa (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 12:25:37 EDT)
Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful Jack Bates (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 13:01:39 EDT)
Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful Paul Vixie (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 13:09:59 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Jack Bates (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 13:18:20 EDT)
Re: bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards) Paul Vixie (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 13:25:23 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Mike Tancsa (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 13:33:53 EDT)
Re: Windows updates and dial up users Owen DeLong (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 13:40:17 EDT)
Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful Stephen L Johnson (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 13:50:14 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:06:59 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Jack Bates (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:10:14 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Dan Hollis (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:13:22 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds (no name) (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:17:05 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Matthew Richardson (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:21:08 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Crist Clark (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:25:35 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Dan Hollis (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:28:40 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Randy Bush (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:42:23 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds (no name) (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:47:25 EDT)
Foundry BigIron series Will Yardley (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:54:46 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Randy Bush (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:55:41 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Kevin Loch (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 11:26:41 EDT)
RE: Foundry BigIron series Joel Perez (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:12:22 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Stephen J. Wilcox (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:15:08 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Andy Walden (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 16:09:20 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Eliot Lear (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:18:07 EDT)
monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:38:56 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Vadim Antonov (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:41:10 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Kee Hinckley (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:36:16 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Jack Bates (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:48:38 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Rich Braun (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:57:32 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Dan Hollis (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 16:05:19 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Jack Bates (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 16:11:48 EDT)
Re: Foundry BigIron series Will Yardley (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 16:24:24 EDT)
[Fwd: monkeys.dom UPL DNSBL being DDOSed to death] Matthew Sullivan (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:00:51 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Joe St Sauver (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:04:23 EDT)
Detecting a non-existent domain Kee Hinckley (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 16:51:27 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Dave Crocker (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:07:54 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Mike Tancsa (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:16:02 EDT)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? Justin Shore (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:07:24 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Dan Hollis (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:15:48 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Jason Slagle (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:21:43 EDT)
Re: Detecting a non-existent domain Dominic J. Eidson (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:24:32 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (no name) (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:32:01 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Jack Bates (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:32:55 EDT)
Re: [Fwd: monkeys.dom UPL DNSBL being DDOSed to death] Chris Lewis (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:36:55 EDT)
Re: Detecting a non-existent domain Jack Bates (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:37:57 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Aaron Dewell (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:46:15 EDT)
RE: Detecting a non-existent domain David Schwartz (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:46:40 EDT)
Re: Detecting a non-existent domain Daniel Roesen (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:47:44 EDT)
Re: [Fwd: monkeys.dom UPL DNSBL being DDOSed to death] Chris Lewis (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:56:51 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Joe Abley (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:00:24 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Petri Helenius (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:03:59 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Dan Hollis (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:08:27 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (no name) (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:12:11 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Kai Schlichting (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:11:23 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Dan Hollis (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:10:56 EDT)
RE: Detecting a non-existent domain David Schwartz (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:15:06 EDT)
Follow up to: [Fwd: monkeys.dom UPL DNSBL being DDOSed to death] Matthew Sullivan (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:25:22 EDT)
Re: Detecting a non-existent domain Daniel Roesen (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:43:09 EDT)
Re: Detecting a non-existent domain Joe Abley (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:57:27 EDT)
Re[2]: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Richard Welty (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:57:24 EDT)
Re: Foundry BigIron series Will Yardley (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 19:12:22 EDT)
Re: [Fwd: monkeys.dom UPL DNSBL being DDOSed to death] Paul Vixie (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 19:17:44 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 19:33:22 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death John Payne (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 19:41:28 EDT)
RE: Detecting a non-existent domain Kee Hinckley (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 19:42:44 EDT)
RE: Detecting a non-existent domain David Schwartz (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 19:52:43 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Justin Shore (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 19:49:29 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Dan Hollis (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 19:56:59 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death John Payne (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 20:02:10 EDT)
RE: Detecting a non-existent domain Kee Hinckley (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 20:16:04 EDT)
RE: Detecting a non-existent domain David Schwartz (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 20:31:21 EDT)
Lucent/Avaya Cajun experiences Andy Grosser (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 21:02:27 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Geo. (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 21:11:12 EDT)
New CA Law Leo Bicknell (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 21:27:55 EDT)
Re: New CA Law Joe St Sauver (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 21:46:06 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (no name) (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 22:05:03 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Petri Helenius (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 02:08:59 EDT)
Appologies Matthew Sullivan (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 02:35:36 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Matthew Sullivan (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 02:41:30 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 02:46:31 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Daniel Karrenberg (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 03:23:14 EDT)
Independent Technical Review Panel (no name) (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 04:27:11 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Jim Segrave (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 05:20:33 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Dr. Jeffrey Race (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 05:22:26 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds M�ns Nilsson (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 05:43:26 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds (no name) (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 07:06:04 EDT)
Re: Independent Technical Review Panel Ken Stubbs (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 08:11:27 EDT)
419 with a twist Stephen J. Wilcox (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 09:09:56 EDT)
Digest from questions about IPTelephony Christopher Bird (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 09:21:57 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Eliot Lear (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 09:33:48 EDT)
Inevitable Consequences--Verisign Curt Akin (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 09:36:20 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Jack Bates (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 09:51:43 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Jack Bates (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 09:56:28 EDT)
Re: Inevitable Consequences--Verisign Petri Helenius (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 10:22:49 EDT)
RE: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Geo. (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 11:27:11 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Jack Bates (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 11:48:44 EDT)
NANOG 29 registration problems. nicholas harteau (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 11:55:48 EDT)
Re: Inevitable Consequences--Verisign Declan McCullagh (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 12:54:59 EDT)
Another DNS blacklist is taken down Justin Shore (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 12:28:39 EDT)
Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Leo Bicknell (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 12:44:16 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 12:48:06 EDT)
Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Patrick (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 12:50:51 EDT)
Re: Inevitable Consequences--Verisign Haesu (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:24:26 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Jack Bates (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:26:16 EDT)
More ports to block Sean Donelan (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:30:08 EDT)
RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (no email) (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:35:08 EDT)
what to do about joe-jobs?, was: Re: Another DNS... David Raistrick (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:48:27 EDT)
RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Joel Perez (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:50:14 EDT)
RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Dan Hollis (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:53:30 EDT)
Re: what to do about joe-jobs?, was: Re: Another DNS... David Raistrick (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:54:08 EDT)
Do not call on hold Timo Janhunen (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:54:54 EDT)
Re: what to do about joe-jobs? Stephen L Johnson (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:10:43 EDT)
RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Justin Shore (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:07:37 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:15:43 EDT)
Re: what to do about joe-jobs? (no name) (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:19:45 EDT)
RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Mark Segal (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:18:33 EDT)
Re: New CA Law Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:20:33 EDT)
Re: what to do about joe-jobs? Justin Shore (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:14:08 EDT)
Re: Inevitable Consequences--Verisign just me (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:23:36 EDT)
Re: "Class A Data Center" Scott Francis (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:20:25 EDT)
Re: what to do about joe-jobs? Stephen J. Wilcox (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:26:59 EDT)
RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Justin Shore (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:18:35 EDT)
Re: what to do about joe-jobs? David Raistrick (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:21:54 EDT)
RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Patrick (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:40:56 EDT)
California Spam-busting bill comes with $1 million penalty JC Dill (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:33:30 EDT)
RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Justin Shore (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:28:19 EDT)
The *.com/robots.txt Guy Coslado (GC0111) (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:52:24 EDT)
Summary of responses: Lucent/Avaya Cajun experiences Andy Grosser (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:08:49 EDT)
Re: what to do about joe-jobs? Stephen L Johnson (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:56:30 EDT)
Re: Detecting a non-existent domain Kee Hinckley (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:51:58 EDT)
Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Jack Bates (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:04:44 EDT)
RADB Christopher J. Wolff (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:13:40 EDT)
Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Leo Bicknell (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:16:14 EDT)
Re: what to do about joe-jobs? Justin Shore (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:07:23 EDT)
Re: "Class A Data Center" Steven M. Bellovin (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:34:56 EDT)
Rack space in Chicago. John Palmer (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:41:57 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Jack Bates (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:46:06 EDT)
Re: "Class A Data Center" Owen DeLong (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:44:45 EDT)
Re: "Class A Data Center" Scott Francis (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:47:15 EDT)
RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Vadim Antonov (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 16:05:07 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Wayne E. Bouchard (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 16:11:48 EDT)
RE: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (no name) (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:58:02 EDT)
RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Christopher Bird (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 16:23:22 EDT)
Re: what to do about joe-jobs? Kee Hinckley (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 16:22:03 EDT)
Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Chris Lewis (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 16:38:56 EDT)
Re: what to do about joe-jobs? Justin Shore (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 16:30:53 EDT)
Blacklisting: obvious P2P app neal rauhauser (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:21:23 EDT)
Re: RADB Larry J. Blunk (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:06:41 EDT)
Re: Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen) (no name) (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:17:21 EDT)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:20:54 EDT)
RE: Blacklisting: obvious P2P app David Schwartz (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:35:35 EDT)
RE: Blacklisting: obvious P2P app Vadim Antonov (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:43:18 EDT)
Re: Blacklisting: obvious P2P app Damian Gerow (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:44:36 EDT)
williams spamhaus blacklist Len Rose (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:54:56 EDT)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (no name) (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:03:25 EDT)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Len Rose (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 18:16:22 EDT)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (no name) (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:14:04 EDT)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Leo Bicknell (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 18:29:33 EDT)
manure distribution Petri Helenius (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 18:33:52 EDT)
RE: williams spamhaus blacklist McBurnett, Jim (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 19:10:12 EDT)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Gary E. Miller (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 19:15:25 EDT)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Scott Granados (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 19:28:52 EDT)
Re[2]: williams spamhaus blacklist Richard Welty (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 19:42:39 EDT)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Leo Bicknell (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 20:01:48 EDT)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Justin Shore (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 19:59:30 EDT)
RE: what to do about joe-jobs? (no name) (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 20:32:49 EDT)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Andy Walden (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 21:25:29 EDT)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Avleen Vig (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 20:46:37 EDT)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Eliot Lear (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 21:53:59 EDT)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Dr. Jeffrey Race (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 21:55:53 EDT)
Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? Drew Weaver (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 22:30:16 EDT)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Dan Hollis (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 22:10:45 EDT)
Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (no name) (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 19:44:58 EDT)
Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? Eric Kagan (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 22:36:00 EDT)
Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? Eric Kuhnke (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 22:42:10 EDT)
workaround published for BIND8 and delegation-only Paul Vixie (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 22:50:56 EDT)
Re: 419 with a twist (no name) (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 23:52:46 EDT)
Latency between Global Crossing & AT&T Steven Schecter (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 23:55:47 EDT)
Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? Todd Vierling (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 23:53:28 EDT)
Re: Latency between Global Crossing & AT&T Matt Levine (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 00:00:50 EDT)
Re: what to do about joe-jobs? Mike Leber (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 03:10:11 EDT)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Steve Linford (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 03:29:42 EDT)
Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL list Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 04:08:13 EDT)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Dr. Jeffrey Race (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 04:22:21 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds (no name) (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 04:54:17 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds (no name) (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 05:11:07 EDT)
Re[2]: williams spamhaus blacklist Hank Nussbacher (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 06:50:58 EDT)
Re[3]: williams spamhaus blacklist Richard Welty (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 07:51:30 EDT)
Re[2]: williams spamhaus blacklist Steve Linford (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 08:22:05 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated David Lesher (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 08:50:43 EDT)
RE: Re[2]: williams spamhaus blacklist netadm (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 09:02:54 EDT)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Susan Harris (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 09:08:27 EDT)
Re: Latency between Global Crossing & AT&T Drew Linsalata (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 09:29:05 EDT)
Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? Rich Braun (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 10:08:14 EDT)
Proposed changes to the AUP. Leo Bicknell (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 10:12:51 EDT)
RE: Proposed changes to the AUP. Wesley Vaux (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 10:18:03 EDT)
Re: Latency between Global Crossing & AT&T Grant A. Kirkwood (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 10:52:43 EDT)
RE: Re[2]: williams spamhaus blacklist Steve Linford (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 11:01:09 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Gerald (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 11:12:05 EDT)
Re: Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen) Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 11:32:08 EDT)
RE: Re[2]: williams spamhaus blacklist netadm (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 11:58:16 EDT)
Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? Patrick (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 12:11:04 EDT)
Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated Gregory Hicks (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 12:59:29 EDT)
RE: What about joe-jobs? Darren Foo (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 13:13:39 EDT)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (no name) (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 13:31:16 EDT)
Experience with McLeodUSA Carrara, Richard (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 13:53:56 EDT)
AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https mike harrison (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 14:24:48 EDT)
RE: williams spamhaus blacklist Deepak Jain (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 14:19:03 EDT)
Re: AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https Brian Bruns (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 14:30:41 EDT)
Re: AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https mike harrison (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 15:00:27 EDT)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Kai Schlichting (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 14:46:39 EDT)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Kai Schlichting (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 15:24:14 EDT)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Kai Schlichting (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 15:26:48 EDT)
Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? Eric A. Hall (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 15:31:23 EDT)
Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? Sabri Berisha (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 15:41:07 EDT)
Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? Aaron Dewell (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 15:44:59 EDT)
Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? Eric A. Hall (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 15:50:03 EDT)
Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? Jay Kline (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 16:12:13 EDT)
Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? Dan Hollis (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 16:28:59 EDT)
Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? Dan Hollis (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 16:31:14 EDT)
Re: AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https - resolved mike harrison (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 17:10:39 EDT)
Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? Matthew Sullivan (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 16:59:21 EDT)
Re: Proposed changes to the AUP. Leo Bicknell (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 17:15:14 EDT)
Increase in tcp traffic from spoofed source to bogon? Mark Segal (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 17:26:44 EDT)
Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? Matthew Sullivan (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 17:04:37 EDT)
Re: Increase in tcp traffic from spoofed source to bogon? Mike Tancsa (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 17:40:50 EDT)
Re: Proposed changes to the AUP. Damian Gerow (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 17:43:38 EDT)
Re: Proposed changes to the AUP. (no name) (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 17:47:40 EDT)
Re: Proposed changes to the AUP. Randy Bush (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 17:52:14 EDT)
Re: AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https - resolved Brian Bruns (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 18:11:23 EDT)
Average case performance vs. Worst-case guarantee Harsha Narayan (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 18:22:48 EDT)
Re: AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https - resolved Ron da Silva (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 19:24:14 EDT)
Re: AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https - resolved Andy Ellifson (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 19:48:11 EDT)
Re: Verisign Responds Dave Crocker (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 19:58:08 EDT)
Re: AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https - resolved (no name) (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 20:25:01 EDT)
Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? ratul mahajan (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 21:50:08 EDT)
Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? JC Dill (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 23:03:09 EDT)
New Team Cymru IP2ASN whois server Stephen Gill (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 02:52:55 EDT)
Re: Average case performance vs. Worst-case guarantee (no name) (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 02:54:56 EDT)
College increases fine for virus computers to $100 Sean Donelan (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 03:02:24 EDT)
Re: New Team Cymru IP2ASN whois server Pekka Savola (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 05:22:36 EDT)
Re: Increase in tcp traffic from spoofed source to bogon? Pekka Savola (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 05:23:44 EDT)
RE: New Team Cymru IP2ASN whois server Jeroen Massar (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 05:53:48 EDT)
The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 08:00:00 EDT)
Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? Andy Smith (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 08:31:21 EDT)
Re: AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https - resolved Ron da Silva (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 08:34:33 EDT)
Re: The Cidr Report Saku Ytti (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 09:12:14 EDT)
RE: New Team Cymru IP2ASN whois server Stephen Gill (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 11:16:12 EDT)
Re: Proposed changes to the AUP. (no name) (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 11:55:33 EDT)
RE: Detecting a non-existent domain (no name) (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:22:06 EDT)
Re: Proposed changes to the AUP. (no name) (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:09:58 EDT)
FW: e-bay Mike Tomasura (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:25:52 EDT)
Re: FW: e-bay Simon Lockhart (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:26:43 EDT)
Re: FW: e-bay Krzysztof Adamski (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:28:44 EDT)
Re: FW: e-bay Gregory Hicks (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:34:02 EDT)
Re: FW: e-bay Tony Rall (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:34:51 EDT)
RE: FW: e-bay Mike Tomasura (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:40:13 EDT)
Re: FW: e-bay Mike Tancsa (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:39:32 EDT)
Re: Increase in tcp traffic from spoofed source to bogon? Crist Clark (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:56:34 EDT)
European and Far East Connectivity in the US Timothy Brown (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 13:26:09 EDT)
Re: FW: e-bay Ken Stubbs (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 13:40:38 EDT)
Re: FW: e-bay Mike Tancsa (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 14:06:22 EDT)
Re: FW: e-bay Joe Abley (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 15:01:14 EDT)
Re: FW: e-bay Mike Tancsa (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 15:12:03 EDT)
[OT] question on NANOG meetings William Caban (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 17:40:28 EDT)
Re: Korean network problems, was FW: e-bay John R. Levine (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 18:23:53 EDT)
Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings Petri Helenius (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 18:28:27 EDT)
Submit your comments on Verisign's SiteFinder service to ICANN Craig A. Huegen (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 18:32:12 EDT)
Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings Joel Jaeggli (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 18:42:32 EDT)
A list of (mostly) technical consequences of TLD wildcards Duane Wessels (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 18:49:11 EDT)
Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings Richard A Steenbergen (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 19:03:21 EDT)
Re: Average case performance vs. Worst-case guarantee Mark Rogaski (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 19:35:09 EDT)
Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings Jeffrey Meltzer (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 03:31:34 EDT)
Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings Henry Linneweh (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 08:51:24 EDT)
Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings Petri Helenius (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 09:06:22 EDT)
Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings Brandon Butterworth (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 09:46:37 EDT)
Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings Marshall Eubanks (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 10:37:33 EDT)
Re: A list of (mostly) technical consequences of TLD wildcards Rik van Riel (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 11:29:57 EDT)
Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings Petri Helenius (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 11:31:16 EDT)
Re: A list of (mostly) technical consequences of TLD wildcards Paul Vixie (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 11:42:18 EDT)
Re: A list of (mostly) technical consequences of TLD wildcards Rik van Riel (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 11:49:00 EDT)
Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL list Rik van Riel (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 12:04:54 EDT)
Re: A list of (mostly) technical consequences of TLD wildcards Paul Vixie (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 12:11:23 EDT)
address harvesting analysis idea Peter Galbavy (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 14:00:07 EDT)
Re: address harvesting analysis idea (no name) (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 12:53:11 EDT)
Re: address harvesting analysis idea Aaron Hopkins (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 16:38:58 EDT)
someone from attbi please contact me regarding host 24.129.84.175 Paul Vixie (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 19:05:51 EDT)
Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) Sean Donelan (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 19:30:20 EDT)
Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) Jason Lewis (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 20:03:39 EDT)
Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) Alan Spicer (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 20:05:47 EDT)
Re: someone from attbi please contact me regarding host 24.129.84.175 Eric Kagan (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 20:31:44 EDT)
Italy: the latest member of the blackout club Sean Donelan (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 00:44:04 EDT)
RE: Italy: the latest member of the blackout club Baldwin, James (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 00:50:36 EDT)
Re: someone from attbi please contact me regarding host 24.129.84.175 Matt (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 02:19:16 EDT)
Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL list Rafi Sadowsky (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 05:14:35 EDT)
Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please Paul Vixie (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 12:05:36 EDT)
Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) Paul Vixie (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 12:09:54 EDT)
Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please (no name) (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 12:32:03 EDT)
Did cambrian go to "business hours only" contact/noc numbers? (no email) (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 14:18:23 EDT)
Re: address harvesting analysis idea Jared Mauch (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 16:50:31 EDT)
OT: CPAN hacked or fubar'd? Eric Germann (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 17:10:58 EDT)
Re: OT: CPAN hacked or fubar'd? Rachael Treu (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 17:33:12 EDT)
ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) Sean Donelan (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 17:31:44 EDT)
RE: OT: CPAN hacked or fubar'd? Eric Germann (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 17:33:03 EDT)
Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) Brian Bruns (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 17:59:40 EDT)
RE: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) Vivien M. (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 18:04:14 EDT)
Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) David Lesher (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 18:20:58 EDT)
Re: ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) Paul Vixie (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 18:46:36 EDT)
Re: ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) Sean Donelan (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 19:12:06 EDT)
Unauthorized DNS updates Lou Katz (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 19:35:07 EDT)
what happened to ARIN tonight ? Mike Tancsa (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 21:29:44 EDT)
Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? Brian Bruns (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 21:38:31 EDT)
Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? Mike Tancsa (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 21:45:41 EDT)
Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? Haesu (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 22:07:31 EDT)
Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? Robert Boyle (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 22:26:00 EDT)
Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? (no name) (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 22:37:05 EDT)
Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? Haesu (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 22:38:57 EDT)
Re: ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) Paul Vixie (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 22:44:40 EDT)
Re: Unauthorized DNS updates Paul Vixie (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 23:29:26 EDT)
Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 01:05:36 EDT)
Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates E.B. Dreger (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 03:03:48 EDT)
Re: ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) Paul Vixie (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 03:34:57 EDT)
Re: ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) Alan Spicer (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 04:28:08 EDT)
Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (no name) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 05:01:49 EDT)
Yet another address harvesting analysis idea (no name) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 05:13:47 EDT)
Re: ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) (no name) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 05:33:02 EDT)
RE: Yet another address harvesting analysis idea Jeroen Massar (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 05:34:03 EDT)
Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? James Cowie (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 06:27:15 EDT)
Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates Joel Jaeggli (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 07:55:49 EDT)
Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? Daniel Karrenberg (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 09:08:18 EDT)
OT: co-lo DC Metro area non-rack-mount box? (no email) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 11:28:38 EDT)
Re: ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) Paul Vixie (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:13:44 EDT)
Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) Owen DeLong (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:24:16 EDT)
Knock, Noc... Whos there? (no name) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:27:07 EDT)
Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) Owen DeLong (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:26:57 EDT)
ICMP Blocking Woes CA Windon (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:43:14 EDT)
Re: ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) Owen DeLong (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:46:35 EDT)
Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (no name) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:48:51 EDT)
RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Mike Batchelor (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:51:08 EDT)
Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Jared Mauch (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:01:57 EDT)
Re: ICMP Blocking Woes Crist Clark (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:02:26 EDT)
Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (no name) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:04:36 EDT)
Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) Owen DeLong (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:07:21 EDT)
Converting from telco Major-V, Major-H coordinates to Lat Long (no name) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:06:04 EDT)
Re: ICMP Blocking Woes Haesu (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:15:32 EDT)
Re: ICMP Blocking Woes mike harrison (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:43:06 EDT)
Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Dan Armstrong (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:11:08 EDT)
Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) Mark Radabaugh (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:46:40 EDT)
Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Jared Mauch (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:49:27 EDT)
Re: ICMP Blocking Woes Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:54:17 EDT)
Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Mike Tancsa (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:59:38 EDT)
RE: Converting from telco Major-V, Major-H coordinates to Lat Long Pete Templin (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:57:09 EDT)
Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Dan Armstrong (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 14:04:45 EDT)
Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Jared Mauch (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 14:33:58 EDT)
Don't like it, order the ISPs to block it Sean Donelan (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 14:47:08 EDT)
Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Steve Linford (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 15:11:32 EDT)
RE: Converting from telco Major-V, Major-H coordinates to Lat Long Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 15:32:17 EDT)
RE: Converting from telco Major-V, Major-H coordinates to Lat Long Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 15:55:13 EDT)
RE: ICMP Blocking Woes Eric Germann (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 15:56:04 EDT)
RE: ICMP Blocking Woes CA Windon (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 16:12:20 EDT)
Re: ICMP Blocking Woes Steven M. Bellovin (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 16:10:59 EDT)
Re: ICMP Blocking Woes Paul Timmins (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 16:30:56 EDT)
Re: ICMP Blocking Woes Kevin Oberman (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 16:41:17 EDT)
Re: ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) Alan Spicer (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 17:42:19 EDT)
Re: Don't like it, order the ISPs to block it Mike Tancsa (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 20:03:49 EDT)
Re: ICMP Blocking Woes E.B. Dreger (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 20:57:53 EDT)
Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates Brandon Ross (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 21:42:19 EDT)
VeriSign tapped to secure Internet voting Eric Germann (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 21:49:14 EDT)
Re: VeriSign tapped to secure Internet voting Henry Linneweh (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 22:31:54 EDT)
Re: ICMP Blocking Woes Geo. (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 06:22:06 EDT)
Re: ICMP Blocking Woes Eric Kagan (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 07:04:52 EDT)
Re: ICMP Blocking Woes Eric Kagan (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 07:07:08 EDT)
Re: ICMP Blocking Woes Anthony Cennami (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 08:31:28 EDT)
RE: Converting from telco Major-V, Major-H coordinates to Lat Long Eric Germann (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 10:55:30 EDT)
FW: Cidera Service Shutting Down Shawn Solomon (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 10:59:28 EDT)
RE: Cidera Service Shutting Down John Lord (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 11:00:54 EDT)
Re: Converting from telco Major-V, Major-H coordinates to Lat Long Jared Mauch (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 11:00:59 EDT)
Alternative Satellite news feed needed Jeffrey Wheat (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 11:02:18 EDT)
Re: Converting from telco Major-V, Major-H coordinates to Lat Long Andy Ellifson (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 11:29:11 EDT)
Re: Converting from telco Major-V, Major-H coordinates to Lat Long Paul Timmins (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 13:22:03 EDT)
Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? William Allen Simpson (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 13:37:44 EDT)
Re: Alternative Satellite news feed needed Richard Irving (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 13:55:16 EDT)
InterNAP Gabriel (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 14:17:49 EDT)
Re: InterNAP John Kinsella (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 14:22:10 EDT)
Re: [Re: Don't like it, order the ISPs to block it] Joshua Sahala (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 14:32:22 EDT)
Adjusting TCP windows on production systems? Temkin, David (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 15:44:03 EDT)
ATTN: Anyone with RBL clue at att.net Ben Browning (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 17:01:23 EDT)
Re: Adjusting TCP windows on production systems? Steve Francis (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 17:17:44 EDT)
Network abuse - Phone Wars Sean Donelan (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 18:05:25 EDT)
Re: Adjusting TCP windows on production systems? Rob Thomas (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 18:06:20 EDT)
Re: Adjusting TCP windows on production systems? Marshall Eubanks (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 18:20:19 EDT)
Re: Alternative Satellite news feed needed Pete Ashdown (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 18:22:43 EDT)
Re: Adjusting TCP windows on production systems? Steve Francis (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 18:27:28 EDT)
Re: Adjusting TCP windows on production systems? Steve Francis (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 18:30:40 EDT)
Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (no name) (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 18:45:04 EDT)
Re: ICMP Blocking Woes Crist Clark (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 20:22:25 EDT)
Re: ICMP Blocking Woes John Kristoff (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 20:36:23 EDT)
Shaw Cable/Big Pipe contact needed Eric Kuhnke (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 20:41:40 EDT)
Re: ICMP Blocking Woes Crist Clark (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 20:58:49 EDT)
ARIN policy proposals of interest Owen DeLong (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 22:13:53 EDT)

Last message date: Tue Sep 30 2003 - 22:15:35 EDT
Archived on: Thu Dec 09 2004 - 16:08:20 EST

1582 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
About this archive
Other mail archives

Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs

Nanog 0309By Date

Nanog 0309
By Date