Nanog 0309
By Author

1582 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
About this archive
Other mail archives

Starting: Mon Sep 01 2003 - 01:38:24 EDT
Ending: Tue Sep 30 2003 - 22:15:35 EDT

• (no email)
  • OT: co-lo DC Metro area non-rack-mount box? (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 11:28:38 EDT)
  • Did cambrian go to "business hours only" contact/noc numbers? (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 14:18:23 EDT)
  • RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:35:08 EDT)
  • RE: Interesting interaction between Blaster worm variants and Verisign DNS change (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:33:15 EDT)
  • Interesting interaction between Blaster worm variants and Verisign DNS change (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 23:29:16 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:36:37 EDT)
  • RE: "Class A Data Center" (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 16:19:21 EDT)
  • Verio is reporting outage at 401 N. B. (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 13:47:41 EDT)
• (no name)
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 18:45:04 EDT)
  • Converting from telco Major-V, Major-H coordinates to Lat Long (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:06:04 EDT)
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:04:36 EDT)
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:48:51 EDT)
  • Knock, Noc... Whos there? (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:27:07 EDT)
  • Re: ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 05:33:02 EDT)
  • Yet another address harvesting analysis idea (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 05:13:47 EDT)
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 05:01:49 EDT)
  • Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 22:37:05 EDT)
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 12:32:03 EDT)
  • Re: address harvesting analysis idea (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 12:53:11 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed changes to the AUP. (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:09:58 EDT)
  • RE: Detecting a non-existent domain (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:22:06 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed changes to the AUP. (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 11:55:33 EDT)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 08:00:00 EDT)
  • Re: Average case performance vs. Worst-case guarantee (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 02:54:56 EDT)
  • Re: AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https - resolved (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 20:25:01 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed changes to the AUP. (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 17:47:40 EDT)
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 13:31:16 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 05:11:07 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 04:54:17 EDT)
  • Re: 419 with a twist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 23:52:46 EDT)
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 19:44:58 EDT)
  • RE: what to do about joe-jobs? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 20:32:49 EDT)
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:14:04 EDT)
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:03:25 EDT)
  • Re: Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen) (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:17:21 EDT)
  • RE: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:58:02 EDT)
  • Re: what to do about joe-jobs? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:19:45 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 07:06:04 EDT)
  • Independent Technical Review Panel (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 04:27:11 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 22:05:03 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:12:11 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:32:01 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:47:25 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:17:05 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 11:43:03 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 08:34:06 EDT)
  • comments on addressing futures.... (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 18:22:47 EDT)
  • Re: Windows updates and dial up users (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 11:00:51 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign's Threat to Infrastructure Stability (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 05:57:17 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 05:42:51 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 05:09:35 EDT)
  • Re: Windows updates and dial up users (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 22:04:54 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 22:00:16 EDT)
  • Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 19:53:49 EDT)
  • Quantifying SiteFinder Traffic (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 16:28:25 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign abusing .COM/.NET monopoly, BIND releases new (fwd) (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 16:15:45 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 09:50:58 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign vs ICANN (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 02:28:38 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 22:39:47 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:12:46 EDT)
  • Re: If Verisign *really* wants to help ... (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 16:22:26 EDT)
  • Wildcards: ICANN and IAB posted their commentaries (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 21:37:41 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 19:06:41 EDT)
  • RE: routing issue? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 17:05:04 EDT)
  • routing issue? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 16:15:20 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:19:15 EDT)
  • Re: FW: Where to get an ASN certificate? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:11:18 EDT)
  • diversion... (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:09:42 EDT)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 08:00:00 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 21:17:28 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 19:24:40 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:06:04 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:10:57 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:00:58 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:36:37 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:39:51 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:00:53 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:29:06 EDT)
  • Re: "Class A Data Center" (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:45:03 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:34:12 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:57:13 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 06:42:19 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 06:24:49 EDT)
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 04:40:01 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign suggestion (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:16:14 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 00:07:57 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:32:10 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:29:33 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 18:39:27 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:46:39 EDT)
  • Re: new openssh issue (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:41:52 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:13:24 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 06:17:20 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 22:08:25 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:46:31 EDT)
  • Re: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:44:13 EDT)
  • Re: Heads up -- potential problems in 3.7, too? [Fwd: OpenSSH Security Advisory: buffer.adv] (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 22:48:16 EDT)
  • Re: Heads up -- potential problems in 3.7, too? [Fwd: OpenSSH Security Advisory: buffer.adv] (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 20:58:13 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:18:30 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:22:34 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:57:54 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:17:45 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:00:45 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:06:44 EDT)
  • Re: new openssh issue (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:50:04 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:00:04 EDT)
  • Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:18:58 EDT)
  • Re: new openssh issue (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:50:04 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:06:44 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:27:08 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:17:45 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:08:11 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:00:45 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:57:54 EDT)
  • Detroit Area (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:22:58 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:59:40 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign's New Change and Outdate RBL's (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 08:41:57 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:46:31 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:11:12 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 17:14:36 EDT)
  • Detroit Area (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 13:07:53 EDT)
  • Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 23:17:39 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 16:05:03 EDT)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 08:00:00 EDT)
  • RE: Alert to Phone/Pager System (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 21:55:30 EDT)
  • SoBig volume way down (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 14:03:03 EDT)
  • Re: paging AS226 : 63/8 does not belong to you (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 16:31:05 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 11:45:03 EDT)
  • Re: Fun new policy at AOL (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 06:39:24 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 22:37:18 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 22:13:41 EDT)
  • Re: dns.exe virus? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 17:36:47 EDT)
  • Re: wire rate filtering and policy routing (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 14:54:47 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 12:10:07 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 12:01:51 EDT)
  • Re: BMITU (Sun Sep 07 2003 - 01:46:40 EDT)
  • Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 07:38:57 EDT)
  • Re: zebra server redundancy (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 13:33:59 EDT)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 08:00:00 EDT)
  • Re: ethernet-based temperature sensors (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 04:49:02 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:31:03 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:28:08 EDT)
  • RE: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:01:52 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 21:47:39 EDT)
  • Re: Hey, QWEST clean up your network (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 19:08:22 EDT)
  • Re: Verio is reporting outage at 401 N. B. (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 14:11:16 EDT)
• -
  • Re: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:22:54 EDT)
• /m
  • RR (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 16:11:35 EDT)
• Aaron Dewell
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 15:44:59 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:46:15 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:01:15 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 20:19:11 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 12:19:49 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 11:18:15 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:21:58 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:21:24 EDT)
• Aaron Hopkins
  • Re: address harvesting analysis idea (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 16:38:58 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:19:21 EDT)
• Adam 'Starblazer' Romberg
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:39:20 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:28:51 EDT)
  • RE: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:24:29 EDT)
• Adam Atkinson
  • RE: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 06:40:00 EDT)
• Adam Debus
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 13:34:35 EDT)
• Adam Hall
  • Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 10:08:35 EDT)
• Adam Langley
  • Verisign Countermeasures - BIND and djbdns patches (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:04:07 EDT)
• Adam Rothschild
  • Roll call, custom IPG support (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 13:11:55 EDT)
• Alan Hannan
  • let the lawsuits begin (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 21:00:22 EDT)
• Alan Spicer
  • Re: ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 17:42:19 EDT)
  • Re: ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 04:28:08 EDT)
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 20:05:47 EDT)
• Alex Bligh
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:23:27 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 04:45:29 EDT)
• Alex Kamantauskas
  • IP issues with .com/.net change? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:17:08 EDT)
• Alex Lambert
  • Heads up -- potential problems in 3.7, too? [Fwd: OpenSSH Security Advisory: buffer.adv] (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 19:37:50 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:17:23 EDT)
  • Re[2]: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:59:44 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:40:14 EDT)
• Alex Rubenstein
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:53:04 EDT)
• Alexander Kiwerski
  • Rogers Cable Contact (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 17:51:50 EDT)
• Allan Liska
  • Re: root server owners? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:27:43 EDT)
  • Re[2]: Alert to Phone/Pager System (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 18:42:38 EDT)
  • Alert to Phone/Pager System (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 17:45:43 EDT)
• Andrew Fried
  • Appreciation for Bind patches (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:14:34 EDT)
• Andrew Staples
  • Networks dropping all ICMP (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 11:47:21 EDT)
• Andy Dills
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:23:16 EDT)
• Andy Ellifson
  • Re: Converting from telco Major-V, Major-H coordinates to Lat Long (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 11:29:11 EDT)
  • Re: AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https - resolved (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 19:48:11 EDT)
  • Go Daddy vs Verisign over Site Finder (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 19:07:13 EDT)
  • Qwest.Net/USWest.Net SWIP Contact for 63.224.0.0/13? (Sun Sep 07 2003 - 13:46:12 EDT)
• Andy Grosser
  • Summary of responses: Lucent/Avaya Cajun experiences (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:08:49 EDT)
  • Lucent/Avaya Cajun experiences (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 21:02:27 EDT)
• Andy Johnson
  • Re: TnT ethernet card fix? (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 16:51:17 EDT)
• Andy Smith
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 08:31:21 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign changes violates RFC2821, and spam implications (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 06:07:28 EDT)
• Andy Walden
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 21:25:29 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 16:09:20 EDT)
  • Re: Cheap temperature sensors (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 09:51:02 EDT)
  • Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 16:37:19 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:36:56 EDT)
  • Re: IP issues with .com/.net change? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:44:43 EDT)
  • Re: Max TNT ping thing (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 17:36:36 EDT)
  • Re: OT: converting 100MB to OC-3 POS (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 08:26:46 EDT)
• Anthony Cennami
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 08:31:28 EDT)
• Ariel Biener
  • Re: Riverhead or Lancope? (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 06:58:41 EDT)
• Austad, Jay
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:19:20 EDT)
  • RE: list thoughts on "unsupported" hardware? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 15:33:28 EDT)
  • RE: cef/process switching problem (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 11:33:54 EDT)
  • cef/process switching problem (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 11:07:40 EDT)
  • RE: SNMP OID's for BGP monitoring (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 13:34:16 EDT)
  • SNMP OID's for BGP monitoring (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 11:23:29 EDT)
  • RE: BMITU (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 14:22:57 EDT)
  • Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:07:48 EDT)
  • RE: bgp as-path info (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 14:18:59 EDT)
  • bgp as-path info (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 14:00:31 EDT)
• Avery Buffington
  • FW: Sendmail 8.12.9 prescan bug (a new one) [CAN-2003-0694] (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 17:06:46 EDT)
• Avleen Vig
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 20:46:37 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 01:07:43 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 01:01:27 EDT)
  • Re: new openssh issue (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:26:57 EDT)
  • Verisign changes violates RFC2821 (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 07:54:40 EDT)
• Baldwin, James
  • RE: Italy: the latest member of the blackout club (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 00:50:36 EDT)
• Ben Browning
  • ATTN: Anyone with RBL clue at att.net (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 17:01:23 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 18:53:44 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:02:48 EDT)
• Ben Crosby
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:29:27 EDT)
• bert hubert
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 14:27:53 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 10:17:25 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 05:11:27 EDT)
  • Re: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:30:37 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Countermeasures - BIND and djbdns patches (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:59:47 EDT)
• Bill Owens
  • OT - fiber optic power meter for 1383 nm (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 11:36:10 EDT)
  • Re: ethernet-based temperature sensors (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:26:00 EDT)
  • IPv4/IPv6 issues (was Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now?) (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 15:28:00 EDT)
• Bob German
  • RE: Home Storage Area Network security (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 20:23:30 EDT)
  • RE: Home Storage Area Network security (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 19:37:53 EDT)
  • RE: "Class A Data Center" (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:58:31 EDT)
  • "Class A Data Center" (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:08:43 EDT)
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:11:37 EDT)
  • ChoiceOne issues today? (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 12:11:57 EDT)
  • RE: ethernet-based temperature sensors (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 10:06:08 EDT)
• Brandon Butterworth
  • Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 09:46:37 EDT)
  • Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 03:23:46 EDT)
• Brandon Ross
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 21:42:19 EDT)
• Braun, Mike
  • RE: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:32:24 EDT)
• Bret Baptist
  • BGP issues (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:04:15 EDT)
• Brian Boles
  • Earthlink Connectivity? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 17:36:51 EDT)
• Brian Bruns
  • Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 21:38:31 EDT)
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 17:59:40 EDT)
  • Re: AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https - resolved (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 18:11:23 EDT)
  • Re: AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 14:30:41 EDT)
  • Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:09:16 EDT)
  • Re: Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:20:22 EDT)
  • Re: Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 12:40:27 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:28:43 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:16:23 EDT)
  • Re: Route failures to behosting.com (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:29:57 EDT)
• Bruce Beckwith
  • FW: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 12:43:07 EDT)
• Bruce Campbell
  • Re: Verisign changes violates RFC2821, and spam implications (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 09:45:30 EDT)
  • RE: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:14:06 EDT)
• Buhrmaster, Gary
  • RE: new openssh issue (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:23:40 EDT)
• CA Windon
  • RE: ICMP Blocking Woes (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 16:12:20 EDT)
  • ICMP Blocking Woes (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:43:14 EDT)
• Carol Wadsworth
  • NANOG 29 (Chicago) Meeting Information (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:31:56 EDT)
• Carrara, Richard
  • Experience with McLeodUSA (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 13:53:56 EDT)
• Casassa, Nathan
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 22:01:11 EDT)
• Chan, Chung Ming
  • Costs of not testing an implementation (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:44:44 EDT)
• Charles Sprickman
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 17:32:13 EDT)
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 17:29:30 EDT)
• Chistos Xenofontas Dimitropoulos
  • pathchar servers (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 02:41:53 EDT)
• Chris Adams
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 21:11:11 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:05:40 EDT)
  • Re: ISC Patches (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 10:35:53 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:14:24 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:51:04 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:54:00 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:24:24 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:10:46 EDT)
  • Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 14:47:32 EDT)
  • Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 14:32:43 EDT)
  • Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 13:52:58 EDT)
• Chris Boyd
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 23:00:58 EDT)
• Chris Horry
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 14:53:12 EDT)
  • Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:40:15 EDT)
• Chris Lewis
  • Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 16:38:56 EDT)
  • Re: [Fwd: monkeys.dom UPL DNSBL being DDOSed to death] (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:56:51 EDT)
  • Re: [Fwd: monkeys.dom UPL DNSBL being DDOSed to death] (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:36:55 EDT)
  • Re: 157.112.0.0/16 ARIN info updated, AT&T still announcing /16 (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 15:13:39 EDT)
  • Re: dns.exe virus? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 17:30:28 EDT)
  • Re: dns.exe virus? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:52:07 EDT)
  • Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:01:06 EDT)
• Chris Roberts
  • Verisign HOWTO (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 06:49:54 EDT)
• Chris Woodfield
  • Re: relays.osirusoft.com (Wed Aug 27 2003 - 13:47:31 EDT)
  • Re: Address for making BGP changes w/ Qwest? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 15:59:01 EDT)
• Christopher Bird
  • RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 16:23:22 EDT)
  • Digest from questions about IPTelephony (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 09:21:57 EDT)
  • RE: IP telephony - Thank you all for insights and answers - no new content in message, but I wanted to acknowledge all who took the time! (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 07:33:58 EDT)
  • IP telephony (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:38:53 EDT)
  • Some very strange network behaviors (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 00:39:25 EDT)
• Christopher J. Wolff
  • RADB (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:13:40 EDT)
  • RE: dns.exe virus? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 19:10:36 EDT)
  • RE: dns.exe virus? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:52:41 EDT)
  • dns.exe virus? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:10:09 EDT)
• Christopher L. Morrow
  • Re: If Verisign *really* wants to help ... (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 17:24:03 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 19:15:26 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:30:48 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:28:05 EDT)
  • RE: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 02:46:21 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 12:52:53 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 02:37:57 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:44:27 EDT)
• Christopher X. Candreva
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 09:20:27 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:38:27 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:21:33 EDT)
  • Vote early... (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:01:19 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Countermeasures - BIND and djbdns patches (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:05:45 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:10:04 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:56:01 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:35:08 EDT)
• chuck goolsbee
  • Re: Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 14:32:07 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone here from Earthlink? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 21:03:34 EDT)
  • Anyone here from Earthlink? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 11:51:37 EDT)
• Cliff Albert
  • Re: New prefix (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 11:18:55 EDT)
• Colin Brown
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:42:06 EDT)
• Craig A. Huegen
  • Submit your comments on Verisign's SiteFinder service to ICANN (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 18:32:12 EDT)
• Crist Clark
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 20:58:49 EDT)
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 20:22:25 EDT)
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:02:26 EDT)
  • Re: Increase in tcp traffic from spoofed source to bogon? (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:56:34 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:25:35 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 17:37:19 EDT)
  • Re: Some very strange network behaviors (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 17:49:56 EDT)
  • Re: Some very strange network behaviors (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 16:35:37 EDT)
• Curt Akin
  • Inevitable Consequences--Verisign (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 09:36:20 EDT)
  • Verisign's Threat to Infrastructure Stability (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 10:30:27 EDT)
• Damian Gerow
  • Re: Proposed changes to the AUP. (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 17:43:38 EDT)
  • Re: Blacklisting: obvious P2P app (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:44:36 EDT)
  • Re: Operations notification manager software (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 09:45:30 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:34:16 EDT)
  • Re: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 18:58:13 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:26:28 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:54:38 EDT)
  • Re: Weekly lamer report (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 10:33:03 EDT)
• Dan Armstrong
  • Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 14:04:45 EDT)
  • Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:11:08 EDT)
• Dan Hollis
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 16:31:14 EDT)
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 16:28:59 EDT)
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 22:10:45 EDT)
  • RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:53:30 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 19:56:59 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:10:56 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:08:27 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:15:48 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 16:05:19 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:28:40 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:13:22 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 00:43:48 EDT)
  • Re: Any actual data to back up blocking Netbios ports? (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 00:12:02 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:09:12 EDT)
  • Re: 157.112.0.0/16 ARIN info updated, AT&T still announcing /16 (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 14:18:20 EDT)
  • Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 14:29:29 EDT)
• Dan Riley
  • Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 12:40:52 EDT)
• Daniel Karrenberg
  • Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 09:08:18 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 03:23:14 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 10:51:11 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 04:13:58 EDT)
  • Re: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 03:31:26 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 03:26:36 EDT)
  • Re: Dynamic Internet Maps based on BGP table / AS_PATH (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 03:33:37 EDT)
  • Re: Dynamic Internet Maps based on BGP table / AS_PATH (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 03:30:26 EDT)
• Daniel Roesen
  • Re: Detecting a non-existent domain (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:43:09 EDT)
  • Re: Detecting a non-existent domain (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:47:44 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 06:18:32 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:45:19 EDT)
• Daniel Senie
  • Re: Microsoft announces new ways to bypass security controls (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 10:40:14 EDT)
  • RE: On the back of other 'security' posts.... (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 21:03:24 EDT)
• Darren Foo
  • RE: What about joe-jobs? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 13:13:39 EDT)
• Daryl G. Jurbala
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:53:38 EDT)
  • OT: Alpharetta, GA fast turnup? (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 11:41:50 EDT)
• Dave Crocker
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 19:58:08 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:07:54 EDT)
• Dave Stewart
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 23:02:45 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 14:16:34 EDT)
• David B Harris
  • Re: Bye Snubby, hello Mail Rejector (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:10:06 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:51:50 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign suggestion (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:42:26 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign suggestion (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 00:36:05 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:05:52 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:05:52 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 04:08:08 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:18:19 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:09:03 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:17:15 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:17:16 EDT)
• David Barak
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:46:33 EDT)
• David Diaz
  • Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 12:49:50 EDT)
• David G. Andersen
  • Re: anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening) (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 18:32:19 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 11:47:20 EDT)
• David Lesher
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 18:20:58 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 08:50:43 EDT)
  • Verisign Responds (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 17:43:21 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 06:44:34 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:36:26 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:54:15 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:55:31 EDT)
  • Re: Virus uptick? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:10:02 EDT)
  • Virus uptick? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:08:22 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:01:27 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:57:11 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 08:55:31 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 21:20:08 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 23:18:24 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft announces new ways to bypass security controls (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 11:32:05 EDT)
  • Re: (Slightly OT) Bandwidth in Belize (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 00:54:26 EDT)
  • Re: ethernet-based temperature sensors (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 21:34:37 EDT)
  • Re: ethernet-based temperature sensors (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 07:59:51 EDT)
• David Meyer
  • New routeviews service available (Address/Prefix -> AS/ASPATH mappings) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:50:38 EDT)
• David Raistrick
  • Re: what to do about joe-jobs? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:21:54 EDT)
  • Re: what to do about joe-jobs?, was: Re: Another DNS... (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:54:08 EDT)
  • what to do about joe-jobs?, was: Re: Another DNS... (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:48:27 EDT)
• David Schwartz
  • RE: Blacklisting: obvious P2P app (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:35:35 EDT)
  • RE: Detecting a non-existent domain (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 20:31:21 EDT)
  • RE: Detecting a non-existent domain (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 19:52:43 EDT)
  • RE: Detecting a non-existent domain (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:15:06 EDT)
  • RE: Detecting a non-existent domain (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:46:40 EDT)
  • RE: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 22:02:06 EDT)
  • RE: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 18:38:12 EDT)
  • RE: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 17:31:32 EDT)
  • RE: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 19:26:21 EDT)
  • RE: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:30:18 EDT)
  • RE: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:50:38 EDT)
  • RE: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 18:41:03 EDT)
  • RE: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 16:34:10 EDT)
  • RE: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 20:12:49 EDT)
• Dean Bogdanovic
  • Internetwork smarTest (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 17:36:31 EDT)
• Declan McCullagh
  • Re: Inevitable Consequences--Verisign (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 12:54:59 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 16:52:06 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 02:32:40 EDT)
• Deepak Jain
  • RE: williams spamhaus blacklist (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 14:19:03 EDT)
  • RE: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:30:53 EDT)
• Dennis Dayman
  • DS1 Question (Sun Sep 14 2003 - 14:32:55 EDT)
• Dominic J. Eidson
  • Re: Detecting a non-existent domain (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:24:32 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:45:28 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:20:06 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:11:12 EDT)
  • Re: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:58:46 EDT)
• Doron Shikmoni
  • Re: public resolver (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 09:26:01 EDT)
• Doug Barton
  • ICANN Secsac message to the board (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 21:55:26 EDT)
  • Re: Wildcards: ICANN and IAB posted their commentaries (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 01:05:01 EDT)
  • Re: BIND 9 (Re: ISC Patches) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 19:41:23 EDT)
  • Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 19:45:39 EDT)
• Douglas S. Peeples
  • RE: Need help with Ex-Pat project (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 09:05:59 EDT)
  • Need help with Ex-Pat project (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 11:55:15 EDT)
• Dr. Jeffrey Race
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 04:22:21 EDT)
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 21:55:53 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 05:22:26 EDT)
  • OT: Interesting visuals. interesting message, 560 kb, 5 min to run (if you have a moment) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:25:22 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:28:19 EDT)
• Drew Linsalata
  • Re: Latency between Global Crossing & AT&T (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 09:29:05 EDT)
  • Eureka/GGN Listening? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:07:44 EDT)
• Drew Weaver
  • Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 22:30:16 EDT)
  • TnT ethernet card fix? (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 16:46:04 EDT)
  • AOL people on list? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 10:22:17 EDT)
• Duane Wessels
  • A list of (mostly) technical consequences of TLD wildcards (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 18:49:11 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:53:58 EDT)
• Dwight Ringdahl
  • RE: Distributed sniffer products (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:42:07 EDT)
• E.B. Dreger
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 20:57:53 EDT)
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 03:03:48 EDT)
  • Re: anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening) (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 18:50:40 EDT)
  • If Verisign wants to cooperate (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 13:07:32 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 12:19:15 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign vs ICANN (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:13:49 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:44:25 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:10:31 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:54:06 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:44:25 EDT)
  • Re: anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:24:26 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:20:21 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:10:31 EDT)
  • anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:01:07 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:15:46 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:17:33 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:04:47 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:45:34 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:34:52 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:44:25 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:27:41 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign responds to complaints via press release (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 20:25:54 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 18:43:48 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 18:05:04 EDT)
  • Re: Where will Verisign stop? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:07:11 EDT)
  • Re: [Re: Change to .com/.net behavior] (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 12:38:23 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 01:37:49 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 21:27:13 EDT)
  • Re: Heads up -- potential problems in 3.7, too? [Fwd: OpenSSH Security Advisory: buffer.adv] (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 21:04:44 EDT)
  • Re: simple way to fix Verisign DNS issues (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:21:05 EDT)
  • Re: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:19:54 EDT)
  • Where will Verisign stop? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 03:38:24 EDT)
  • Re: Patching BIND (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 01:56:02 EDT)
  • Patching BIND (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 01:32:50 EDT)
• Ejay Hire
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 16:19:20 EDT)
  • RE: bgp as-path info (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 11:21:42 EDT)
• Eliot Lear
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 21:53:59 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 09:33:48 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:18:07 EDT)
  • [resend] OT: operators script writers' experience wanted (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 11:01:13 EDT)
• Eric A. Hall
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 15:50:03 EDT)
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 15:31:23 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 13:14:24 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 12:28:09 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 16:21:57 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 16:06:51 EDT)
• Eric Gauthier
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:31:19 EDT)
  • Re: More on the DDoS Attack (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 18:30:01 EDT)
  • Re: More on the DDoS Attack (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 10:38:53 EDT)
  • Re: More on the DDoS Attack (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 19:16:54 EDT)
• Eric Germann
  • RE: Converting from telco Major-V, Major-H coordinates to Lat Long (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 10:55:30 EDT)
  • VeriSign tapped to secure Internet voting (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 21:49:14 EDT)
  • RE: ICMP Blocking Woes (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 15:56:04 EDT)
  • RE: OT: CPAN hacked or fubar'd? (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 17:33:03 EDT)
  • OT: CPAN hacked or fubar'd? (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 17:10:58 EDT)
  • ICANN asks VeriSign to pull redirect service (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 22:42:37 EDT)
  • RE: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 22:09:34 EDT)
  • RE: apathy (was Re: .ORG problems this evening) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:51:42 EDT)
  • RE: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 08:01:14 EDT)
  • RE: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 21:19:57 EDT)
  • RE: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 21:16:18 EDT)
  • Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 18:08:47 EDT)
  • RE: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:20:06 EDT)
  • RE: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:10:34 EDT)
  • RE: dry pair (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 23:05:04 EDT)
• Eric Kagan
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 07:07:08 EDT)
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 07:04:52 EDT)
  • Re: someone from attbi please contact me regarding host 24.129.84.175 (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 20:31:44 EDT)
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 22:36:00 EDT)
• Eric Kuhnke
  • Shaw Cable/Big Pipe contact needed (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 20:41:40 EDT)
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 22:42:10 EDT)
• Eric Whitehill
  • AOL Postmaster contact? (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 15:35:53 EDT)
• Fisher, Shawn
  • RE: BMITU (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 13:09:25 EDT)
  • RE: BMITU (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:47:13 EDT)
  • BMITU (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:02:32 EDT)
• Frank
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 05:57:17 EDT)
• Fred Baker
  • RE: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:45:26 EDT)
• Gabriel
  • InterNAP (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 14:17:49 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? [OT] (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:27:58 EDT)
• Gary E. Miller
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 19:15:25 EDT)
• Geo.
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 06:22:06 EDT)
  • RE: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 11:27:11 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 21:11:12 EDT)
  • Re: Home Storage Area Network security (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 22:41:20 EDT)
  • Re: Home Storage Area Network security (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 20:14:42 EDT)
  • RE: TnT ethernet card fix? (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 16:40:27 EDT)
• George Bakos
  • Re: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:21:22 EDT)
• George William Herbert
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 21:56:18 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 17:22:57 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 04:21:18 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:04:03 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:11:40 EDT)
  • Re: Sabotage not backhoes: More cable cuts (Sun Sep 14 2003 - 17:10:33 EDT)
  • Re: Earthquake in the East Bay (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 23:45:27 EDT)
• Gerald
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 11:12:05 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:49:37 EDT)
  • RE: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:52:11 EDT)
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:16:36 EDT)
  • Verisign suggestion (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 00:25:48 EDT)
• Gerardo Gregory
  • Re: Address for making BGP changes w/ Qwest? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:18:49 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 10:48:43 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 17:28:23 EDT)
• Gil Levi
  • OT: converting 100MB to OC-3 POS (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 05:35:51 EDT)
• Graham Freeman
  • Re: Appreciation for Bind patches (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 20:01:41 EDT)
• Grant A. Kirkwood
  • Re: Latency between Global Crossing & AT&T (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 10:52:43 EDT)
• Greg Maxwell
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:01:25 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:23:51 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:53:17 EDT)
  • Re: Networks dropping all ICMP (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 13:28:05 EDT)
  • Re: Distributed sniffer products (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 10:43:11 EDT)
• Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
  • Re: Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen) (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 11:32:08 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:03:11 EDT)
• Gregory Hicks
  • Re: FW: e-bay (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:34:02 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 12:59:29 EDT)
  • Re: Some very strange network behaviors (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 17:30:42 EDT)
• Guy Coslado (GC0111)
  • The *.com/robots.txt (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:52:24 EDT)
• H. Michael Smith, Jr.
  • Dynamic Internet Maps based on BGP table / AS_PATH (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 17:02:27 EDT)
• Haesu
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:15:32 EDT)
  • Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 22:38:57 EDT)
  • Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 22:07:31 EDT)
  • Re: Inevitable Consequences--Verisign (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:24:26 EDT)
  • Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 02:50:50 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 21:58:04 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN asks VeriSign to pull redirect service (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 23:12:14 EDT)
  • Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 16:33:40 EDT)
  • Re: Route failures to behosting.com (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 23:53:13 EDT)
  • Re: Route failures to behosting.com (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:46:21 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign responds to complaints via press release (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 20:01:37 EDT)
  • Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 19:04:52 EDT)
  • Re: blocking AS30060 (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:29:27 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:59:06 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:16:28 EDT)
  • Re: zebra server redundancy (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 15:02:52 EDT)
• Hank Nussbacher
  • Re[2]: williams spamhaus blacklist (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 06:50:58 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 02:23:40 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:48:43 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 02:50:07 EDT)
  • Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 10:46:12 EDT)
• Harsha Narayan
  • Average case performance vs. Worst-case guarantee (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 18:22:48 EDT)
• Henry Linneweh
  • Re: VeriSign tapped to secure Internet voting (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 22:31:54 EDT)
  • Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 08:51:24 EDT)
  • Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 02:23:04 EDT)
  • Re: IP telephony (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:28:44 EDT)
  • Re: OT: converting 100MB to OC-3 POS (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 13:42:58 EDT)
• Henry Yen
  • Re: Windows updates and dial up users (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 11:01:36 EDT)
  • Re: routing issue? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 16:31:58 EDT)
  • Re: route to behosting.com (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 22:59:19 EDT)
  • Re: Route failures to behosting.com (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:35:54 EDT)
• Hermann Wecke
  • Cyber World Internet Services (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 15:13:09 EDT)
• Ian Mason
  • Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 19:33:52 EDT)
  • Real network failure causes Was: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 09:59:09 EDT)
  • Re: ethernet-based temperature sensors (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 10:11:35 EDT)
• Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 06:44:18 EDT)
  • Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:22:15 EDT)
  • Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:28:07 EDT)
  • Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 07:57:15 EDT)
  • Re: public resolver (was: bind patch? (Re: What *are* they smoking?)) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 06:55:41 EDT)
  • Re: BGP issues (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:38:12 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 08:10:32 EDT)
  • Re: public resolver (was: bind patch? (Re: What *are* they smoking?)) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 06:57:16 EDT)
  • Re: IP telephony (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 06:28:37 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 04:28:44 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 vs IPv4 (Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now?) (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 04:43:02 EDT)
  • Re: On the back of other 'security' posts.... (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 03:44:15 EDT)
• Ingevaldson, Dan (ISS Atlanta)
  • FW: ISS Security Brief: ProFTPD ASCII File Remote Compromise Vulnerability (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 11:52:45 EDT)
  • RE: new openssh issue (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:35:33 EDT)
  • RE: new openssh issue (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:00:57 EDT)
  • RE: ISS X-Force MS03-039 Free Scanner (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 18:45:48 EDT)
  • ISS X-Force MS03-039 Free Scanner (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 08:53:46 EDT)
  • ISS Security Brief: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Microsoft RPC Service (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 14:35:47 EDT)
• Jack Bates
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:46:06 EDT)
  • Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:04:44 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:26:16 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 11:48:44 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 09:56:28 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 09:51:43 EDT)
  • Re: Detecting a non-existent domain (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:37:57 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:32:55 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 16:11:48 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:48:38 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:10:14 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 13:18:20 EDT)
  • Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 13:01:39 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 12:11:53 EDT)
  • Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 10:44:53 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN asks VeriSign to pull redirect service (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 10:26:43 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 13:14:30 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 11:57:10 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 16:07:51 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 10:47:32 EDT)
  • Re: "Class A Data Center" (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 16:55:13 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:31:27 EDT)
  • Re: IP issues with .com/.net change? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:41:13 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 12:38:34 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 12:00:50 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 11:09:30 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 10:58:40 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:29:06 EDT)
  • Re: More on the DDoS Attack (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 11:41:27 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 15:12:15 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 15:16:34 EDT)
  • Re: BMITU (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 16:52:47 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 14:18:22 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 14:33:43 EDT)
  • Re: BMITU (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:32:23 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:30:04 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:20:55 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:15:23 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 vs IPv4 (Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now?) (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:48:03 EDT)
  • Re: bgp as-path info (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 14:16:48 EDT)
• james
  • Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 14:48:41 EDT)
• James Cowie
  • Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 06:27:15 EDT)
• Jan Czmok
  • Proxy posting: Worldcom DS3 hub down ? (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 09:16:33 EDT)
  • Cogentco/PSI BGP Admin around ? (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 05:24:03 EDT)
• Jared Mauch
  • Re: Converting from telco Major-V, Major-H coordinates to Lat Long (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 11:00:59 EDT)
  • Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 14:33:58 EDT)
  • Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:49:27 EDT)
  • Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:01:57 EDT)
  • Re: address harvesting analysis idea (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 16:50:31 EDT)
  • Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 03:28:57 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:22:40 EDT)
  • Re: Heads up -- potential problems in 3.7, too? [Fwd: OpenSSH Security Advisory: buffer.adv] (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 23:16:18 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:41:30 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:38:05 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 15:34:45 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 15:03:19 EDT)
  • Re: SNMP OID's for BGP monitoring (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 11:27:23 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 03:25:28 EDT)
  • IPv6 vs IPv4 (Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now?) (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 16:48:28 EDT)
  • Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 15:49:53 EDT)
  • Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 11:41:16 EDT)
• Jason Frisvold
  • Re: cef/process switching problem (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 11:24:14 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:39:39 EDT)
  • Cisco Service Provider code - Any good? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 13:48:14 EDT)
• Jason Garman
  • A quick examination of the VeriSign disaster (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:45:05 EDT)
• Jason Lewis
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 20:03:39 EDT)
• Jason Slagle
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:21:43 EDT)
• Jay Greenberg
  • Anybody from AT&T? (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 01:29:37 EDT)
• Jay Hennigan
  • Re: "Class A Data Center" (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:14:22 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:09:06 EDT)
  • Re: blocking AS30060 (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:58:08 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:39:18 EDT)
• Jay Kline
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 16:12:13 EDT)
• JC Dill
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 23:03:09 EDT)
  • California Spam-busting bill comes with $1 million penalty (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:33:30 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 20:08:51 EDT)
• Jeff S Wheeler
  • Re: BGP issues (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 23:25:00 EDT)
  • RE: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:58:02 EDT)
  • Re: SNMP OID's for BGP monitoring (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 19:19:29 EDT)
• Jeff Wasilko
  • VeriSign responds to complaints via press release (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 19:40:56 EDT)
  • Re: Heads up -- potential problems in 3.7, too? [Fwd: OpenSSH Security Advisory: buffer.adv] (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 21:03:38 EDT)
• Jeffrey Meltzer
  • Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 03:31:34 EDT)
• Jeffrey Wheat
  • Alternative Satellite news feed needed (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 11:02:18 EDT)
• Jeroen Massar
  • RE: Yet another address harvesting analysis idea (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 05:34:03 EDT)
  • RE: New Team Cymru IP2ASN whois server (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 05:53:48 EDT)
  • RE: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 11:03:30 EDT)
  • RE: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 16:00:56 EDT)
  • RE: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:13:48 EDT)
  • RE: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:18:26 EDT)
  • RE: Re: CalPOP contact? HTTP CONNECT scanning] (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 13:14:39 EDT)
  • RE: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 07:11:56 EDT)
  • RE: Re: CalPOP contact? HTTP CONNECT scanning] (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 06:40:17 EDT)
  • RE: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 11:37:35 EDT)
  • CalPOP contact? HTTP CONNECT scanning (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 20:17:52 EDT)
  • RE: IPv6 vs IPv4 (Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now?) (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:59:35 EDT)
• Jerry Eyers
  • Re: Windows updates and dial up users (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 08:38:23 EDT)
  • Just had an interesting side effect of the "V" hijack... (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:21:11 EDT)
  • Fw: Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:10:41 EDT)
  • ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:57:13 EDT)
• Jim Segrave
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 05:20:33 EDT)
• Jim Shankland
  • Re: Appreciation for Bind patches (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 23:45:44 EDT)
  • Re: BMITU (Sun Sep 07 2003 - 01:11:41 EDT)
• Joe Abley
  • Re: FW: e-bay (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 15:01:14 EDT)
  • Re: Detecting a non-existent domain (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:57:27 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:00:24 EDT)
  • Re: FW: Where to get an ASN certificate? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:18:18 EDT)
  • Re: OT: converting 100MB to OC-3 POS (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 07:45:39 EDT)
  • Re: Real network failure causes Was: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 10:56:55 EDT)
• Joe Boyce
  • Re: SoBig volume way down (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 14:21:41 EDT)
• Joe Maimon
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:43:17 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:57:35 EDT)
• Joe Provo
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 20:31:27 EDT)
• Joe St Sauver
  • Re: New CA Law (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 21:46:06 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:04:23 EDT)
• Joel Jaeggli
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 07:55:49 EDT)
  • Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 18:42:32 EDT)
  • RE: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:28:51 EDT)
  • Re: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:21:45 EDT)
  • Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 15:53:50 EDT)
  • Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 14:56:27 EDT)
• Joel Perez
  • RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:50:14 EDT)
  • RE: Foundry BigIron series (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:12:22 EDT)
  • RE: Address for making BGP changes w/ Qwest? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:28:45 EDT)
• Joel Rowbottom
  • Re: BMITU (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:53:19 EDT)
• Johannes Ullrich
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 19:51:52 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:56:10 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:27:04 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:16:09 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:57:16 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:25:44 EDT)
  • RE: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:12:08 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:11:04 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:33:20 EDT)
• John Brown
  • Re: comments on addressing futures.... (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 19:30:26 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN asks VeriSign to pull redirect service (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 23:20:32 EDT)
  • Bind 8 and delegation only ? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 21:49:31 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:58:04 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 02:13:24 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:41:01 EDT)
  • simple way to fix Verisign DNS issues (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:05:04 EDT)
  • Re: Patching BIND (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 01:41:28 EDT)
• John Dvorak
  • Re: ICANN asks VeriSign to pull redirect service (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 18:19:45 EDT)
• John Ferriby
  • RE: Verisign's legal woes??? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:08:45 EDT)
  • RE: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:20:21 EDT)
• John Kinsella
  • Re: InterNAP (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 14:22:10 EDT)
• John Kristoff
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 20:36:23 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 21:51:05 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:30:23 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:55:18 EDT)
• John Lord
  • RE: Cidera Service Shutting Down (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 11:00:54 EDT)
• John Neiberger
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 16:16:32 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:29:05 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:29:05 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:59:27 EDT)
  • News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:07:21 EDT)
  • Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:27:23 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:17:53 EDT)
• John Obi
  • Riverhead or Lancope? (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 04:13:38 EDT)
• John Palmer
  • Rack space in Chicago. (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:41:57 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:26:03 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:43:06 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:07:07 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:41:39 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:42:02 EDT)
• John Palmer (NANOG Acct)
  • Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 16:45:57 EDT)
• John Payne
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 20:02:10 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 19:41:28 EDT)
  • Re: 157.112.0.0/16 ARIN info updated, AT&T still announcing /16 (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 12:32:58 EDT)
  • wire rate filtering and policy routing (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 13:20:24 EDT)
• John R. Levine
  • Re: Korean network problems, was FW: e-bay (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 18:23:53 EDT)
• John Souvestre
  • RE: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 23:53:14 EDT)
• Johnny Eriksson
  • RE: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:27:22 EDT)
• Joiner, Joshua
  • Contact from Verio (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:05:15 EDT)
• Jonathan Crockett
  • Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 10:59:51 EDT)
• Jonathan Hunter
  • Re: Windows updates and dial up users (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 06:13:00 EDT)
• Joshua Sahala
  • Re: [Re: Don't like it, order the ISPs to block it] (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 14:32:22 EDT)
  • Re: [Re: Change to .com/.net behavior] (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:50:42 EDT)
• just me
  • Re: Inevitable Consequences--Verisign (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:23:36 EDT)
  • Re: anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening) (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 19:04:18 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:41:41 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:30:38 EDT)
  • Re: [Re: Change to .com/.net behavior] (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 09:23:18 EDT)
• Justin Shore
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 19:59:30 EDT)
  • Re: what to do about joe-jobs? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 16:30:53 EDT)
  • Re: what to do about joe-jobs? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:07:23 EDT)
  • RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:28:19 EDT)
  • RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:18:35 EDT)
  • Re: what to do about joe-jobs? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:14:08 EDT)
  • RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:07:37 EDT)
  • Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 12:28:39 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 19:49:29 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:07:24 EDT)
  • Re: Operations notification manager software (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 16:58:29 EDT)
  • Re: Operations notification manager software (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 01:23:35 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 13:55:00 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 21:53:17 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 21:32:55 EDT)
  • RE: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:30:42 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:21:47 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:19:20 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 19:49:17 EDT)
  • RE: Sabotage not backhoes: More cable cuts (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:13:01 EDT)
  • Re: Sabotage not backhoes: More cable cuts (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:53:25 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:12:53 EDT)
• k claffy
  • caida annotated networking bibliography (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 00:24:15 EDT)
  • AS taxonomy (transit/stub, multi-single-homing) (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 00:05:15 EDT)
  • caida macroscopic geographic analysis of IPv6 addresses (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 00:00:04 EDT)
• Kai Schlichting
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 15:26:48 EDT)
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 15:24:14 EDT)
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 14:46:39 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:11:23 EDT)
  • 157.112.0.0/16 ARIN info updated, AT&T still announcing /16 (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 11:52:48 EDT)
  • paging AS226 : 63/8 does not belong to you (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 16:20:18 EDT)
  • arin.net DNS problems (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 18:41:54 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:06:50 EDT)
  • Re: CalPOP contact? HTTP CONNECT scanning (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 17:29:17 EDT)
• Kandra Nygårds
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:22:39 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:06:51 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign HOWTO (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 07:03:33 EDT)
• Karsten W. Rohrbach
  • Re: change to the COM and NET TLD (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 06:18:20 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 06:03:12 EDT)
• Kee Hinckley
  • Re: what to do about joe-jobs? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 16:22:03 EDT)
  • Re: Detecting a non-existent domain (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:51:58 EDT)
  • RE: Detecting a non-existent domain (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 20:16:04 EDT)
  • RE: Detecting a non-existent domain (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 19:42:44 EDT)
  • Detecting a non-existent domain (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 16:51:27 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:36:16 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign vs ICANN (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 17:03:04 EDT)
• Ken Budd
  • RE: dns.exe virus? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:35:08 EDT)
• ken emery
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 15:00:53 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 14:34:17 EDT)
  • Re: Heads up -- potential problems in 3.7, too? [Fwd: OpenSSH Security Advisory: buffer.adv] (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 21:00:42 EDT)
  • RE: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:35:36 EDT)
• Ken Stubbs
  • Re: FW: e-bay (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 13:40:38 EDT)
  • Re: Independent Technical Review Panel (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 08:11:27 EDT)
• Keptin Komrade Dr. BobWrench III esq.
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:47:01 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:35:41 EDT)
  • Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:49:34 EDT)
• Kevin Loch
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 11:26:41 EDT)
  • Are Wildcards another Y2K? (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 13:17:14 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:52:46 EDT)
• Kevin Oberman
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 16:41:17 EDT)
  • Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 16:53:58 EDT)
• Krzysztof Adamski
  • Re: FW: e-bay (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:28:44 EDT)
• Larry J. Blunk
  • Re: RADB (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:06:41 EDT)
• Larry Rosenman
  • Re: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:39:50 EDT)
• Larry Snyder
  • Re: FW: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:59:23 EDT)
• Lars Erik Gullerud
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:51:52 EDT)
• Len Rose
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 18:16:22 EDT)
  • williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:54:56 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign vs ICANN (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 15:53:53 EDT)
  • Verisign vs ICANN (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 15:28:59 EDT)
  • new openssh issue (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:20:42 EDT)
• Len Sassaman
  • Re: Appreciation for Bind patches (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:46:04 EDT)
  • Re: IP issues with .com/.net change? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 17:28:07 EDT)
  • Re: IP issues with .com/.net change? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 17:08:19 EDT)
  • Re: IP issues with .com/.net change? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:39:35 EDT)
  • Re: BIND 9 (Re: ISC Patches) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:25:40 EDT)
• Leo Bicknell
  • Re: Proposed changes to the AUP. (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 17:15:14 EDT)
  • Proposed changes to the AUP. (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 10:12:51 EDT)
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 20:01:48 EDT)
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 18:29:33 EDT)
  • Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:16:14 EDT)
  • Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 12:44:16 EDT)
  • New CA Law (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 21:27:55 EDT)
  • Verisign Responds (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 21:23:07 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:39:13 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:19:49 EDT)
  • Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:05:58 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign suggestion (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:15:36 EDT)
• Lou Katz
  • Unauthorized DNS updates (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 19:35:07 EDT)
  • Re: Route failures to behosting.com (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 00:26:28 EDT)
  • route to behosting.com (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 22:37:12 EDT)
  • Route failures to behosting.com (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:23:09 EDT)
  • Earthquake in the East Bay (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 22:02:39 EDT)
• Lucas Iglesias
  • RE: bgp as-path info (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 14:10:17 EDT)
• Luke Starrett
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:56:53 EDT)
  • RE: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:33:08 EDT)
  • RE: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:05:06 EDT)
  • RE: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:26:47 EDT)
• Lyndon Nerenberg
  • Re: Bye Snubby, hello Mail Rejector (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:27:13 EDT)
  • If Verisign *really* wants to help ... (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:20:43 EDT)
  • Re: (Slightly OT) Bandwidth in Belize (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 01:28:54 EDT)
• Majdi S. Abbas
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 18:02:15 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 05:08:22 EDT)
• Mans Nilsson
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 03:27:38 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft announces new ways to bypass security controls (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 03:22:02 EDT)
• Marc MERLIN
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:01:21 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:27:11 EDT)
• Marc Slemko
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:56:07 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:00:24 EDT)
• Margie
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:33:15 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:38:58 EDT)
• Marius Strom
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:37:35 EDT)
  • Re: (Slightly OT) Bandwidth in Belize (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 01:32:09 EDT)
  • Re: (Slightly OT) Bandwidth in Belize (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 01:31:44 EDT)
  • (Slightly OT) Bandwidth in Belize (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 00:41:56 EDT)
  • cox.net/cox-internet.com people here? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 21:15:09 EDT)
• Mark
  • Re: New prefix (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 14:45:19 EDT)
• Mark Borchers
  • RE: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:17:15 EDT)
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 09:35:34 EDT)
• Mark Foster
  • Re: Looking for clue at NetSOL/Verisign (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 11:07:37 EDT)
• Mark Jeftovic
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:42:01 EDT)
• Mark Kasten
  • Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:27:01 EDT)
• Mark Radabaugh
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:46:40 EDT)
  • Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 12:03:15 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:52:01 EDT)
• Mark Rogaski
  • Re: Average case performance vs. Worst-case guarantee (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 19:35:09 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Cisco 4x00 rails) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:14:24 EDT)
• Mark Segal
  • Increase in tcp traffic from spoofed source to bogon? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 17:26:44 EDT)
  • RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:18:33 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco IOS Failure due to Virus (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 15:33:36 EDT)
  • RE: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 13:59:22 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco IOS Failure due to Virus (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 13:49:52 EDT)
• Mark Vallar
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:30:47 EDT)
• Mark Vevers
  • Fwd: Re: Patching BIND (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 05:00:54 EDT)
  • Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 09:13:19 EDT)
  • Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 09:24:05 EDT)
• Marshall Eubanks
  • Re: Adjusting TCP windows on production systems? (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 18:20:19 EDT)
  • Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 10:37:33 EDT)
• Martin Hepworth
  • <OT> Mad DNS Disease (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 11:46:12 EDT)
• Martin J. Levy
  • RE: SNMP OID's for BGP monitoring (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 13:58:25 EDT)
• Mathias Körber
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 10:35:40 EDT)
• Matt
  • Re: someone from attbi please contact me regarding host 24.129.84.175 (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 02:19:16 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 22:47:03 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 22:40:18 EDT)
  • Worst design decisions? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 18:43:24 EDT)
• Matt Larson
  • VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 14:01:39 EDT)
  • Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:24:29 EDT)
• Matt Levine
  • Re: Latency between Global Crossing & AT&T (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 00:00:50 EDT)
• Matthew Crocker
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:17:59 EDT)
  • Cisco ONS 15454 Password Recovery (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 23:04:56 EDT)
• Matthew Kaufman
  • RE: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 14:25:41 EDT)
  • RE: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:32:21 EDT)
  • RE: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:14:43 EDT)
  • RE: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:32:29 EDT)
  • RE: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:53:10 EDT)
• Matthew Richardson
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:21:08 EDT)
  • ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 17:04:06 EDT)
• Matthew S. Hallacy
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 14:02:17 EDT)
  • Looking for clue at NetSOL/Verisign (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 06:33:29 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 19:13:03 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:45:08 EDT)
  • Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:16:55 EDT)
  • Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 11:45:26 EDT)
  • Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 08:39:17 EDT)
• Matthew Sullivan
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 17:04:37 EDT)
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 16:59:21 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 02:41:30 EDT)
  • Appologies (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 02:35:36 EDT)
  • Follow up to: [Fwd: monkeys.dom UPL DNSBL being DDOSed to death] (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:25:22 EDT)
  • [Fwd: monkeys.dom UPL DNSBL being DDOSed to death] (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:00:51 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:38:00 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:31:53 EDT)
  • Re: Don't forget about physical security - Australia (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 02:26:42 EDT)
  • Re: More on the DDoS Attack (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 21:15:02 EDT)
  • More on the DDoS Attack (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 18:59:35 EDT)
  • Re: More universities take action to block unpatched/infected computers (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 01:49:39 EDT)
  • What were we saying about edge filtering? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 01:46:46 EDT)
• matthew zeier
  • ethernet-based temperature sensors (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 20:17:48 EDT)
  • teleglobe planned outage - 2pm Pacific ? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 19:55:37 EDT)
• Matthew Zito
  • RE: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:15:59 EDT)
• McBurnett, Jim
  • RE: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 19:10:12 EDT)
  • RE: Route failures to behosting.com (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:57:28 EDT)
  • RE: BMITU (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 21:47:55 EDT)
• Mehmet Akcin
  • Dedicated hosting / Colocation folk (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 01:21:33 EDT)
  • Re: Dynamic Internet Maps based on BGP table / AS_PATH (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 17:09:01 EDT)
  • Re: Weekly lamer report (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 10:45:20 EDT)
  • Re: Weekly lamer report (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 09:43:13 EDT)
• Micah McNelly
  • roadrunner. (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 18:25:01 EDT)
• michael
  • Re: Verisign's legal woes??? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:56:33 EDT)
  • Many single letter.com/net reserved by IANA now Verisign (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 02:08:21 EDT)
• Michael K. Smith
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:16:07 EDT)
  • OT: Fiber or DS-3 access in Morgantown, West Virginia (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 12:50:42 EDT)
• Michael Loftis
  • RE: If Verisign *really* wants to help ... (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:13:01 EDT)
  • RE: BMITU (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 22:00:09 EDT)
• Michael Lucking
  • Atlanta Internet exchange (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 12:10:14 EDT)
• Michael Martin
  • Re: Riverhead or Lancope? (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 07:52:00 EDT)
• Michael Tokarev
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:41:05 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:24:44 EDT)
• Michel Py
  • RE: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:51:00 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco introduced 'warm' reload... (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 23:11:52 EDT)
  • RE: Cisco introduced 'warm' reload... (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 15:01:25 EDT)
  • RE: cef/process switching problem (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 14:08:25 EDT)
• Mike Batchelor
  • RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:51:08 EDT)
• Mike Damm
  • RE: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 13:02:59 EDT)
  • RE: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 10:53:19 EDT)
  • RE: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 12:41:13 EDT)
  • RE: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 19:17:14 EDT)
  • FW: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:16:38 EDT)
  • RE: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:52:19 EDT)
  • Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:07:41 EDT)
  • RE: Dynamic Internet Maps based on BGP table / AS_PATH (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 18:35:00 EDT)
• Mike Donahue
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:22:08 EDT)
• mike harrison
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:43:06 EDT)
  • Re: AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https - resolved (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 17:10:39 EDT)
  • Re: AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 15:00:27 EDT)
  • AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 14:24:48 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:36:19 EDT)
• Mike Leber
  • Re: what to do about joe-jobs? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 03:10:11 EDT)
  • RE: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:43:42 EDT)
• Mike Lewinski
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:24:45 EDT)
  • Re: Some very strange network behaviors (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 09:20:22 EDT)
• Mike Tancsa
  • Re: Don't like it, order the ISPs to block it (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 20:03:49 EDT)
  • Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:59:38 EDT)
  • Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 21:45:41 EDT)
  • what happened to ARIN tonight ? (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 21:29:44 EDT)
  • Re: FW: e-bay (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 15:12:03 EDT)
  • Re: FW: e-bay (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 14:06:22 EDT)
  • Re: FW: e-bay (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:39:32 EDT)
  • Re: Increase in tcp traffic from spoofed source to bogon? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 17:40:50 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:16:02 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 13:33:53 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 12:25:37 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 12:02:29 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 21:36:38 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 10:39:16 EDT)
  • Re: Virus uptick? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:59:52 EDT)
  • Now a Sendmail issue as well (was Re: new openssh issue) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:17:39 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:55:59 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:38:14 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 09:01:02 EDT)
  • Re: New prefix (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 11:14:23 EDT)
  • Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:40:46 EDT)
  • Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 10:50:55 EDT)
• Mike Tomasura
  • RE: FW: e-bay (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:40:13 EDT)
  • FW: e-bay (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:25:52 EDT)
• Miles Fidelman
  • Re: Fw: Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:00:56 EDT)
• Miquel van Smoorenburg
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 05:47:15 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 18:26:29 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 04:43:26 EDT)
• Mr. James W. Laferriere
  • Re: bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards) (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 09:08:22 EDT)
  • Re: bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards) (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 14:22:57 EDT)
  • Re: Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:07:05 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:25:36 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:21:45 EDT)
• Måns Nilsson
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 05:43:26 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 03:31:23 EDT)
• Nathan E Norman
  • Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 11:12:16 EDT)
  • Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 11:06:12 EDT)
  • Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 08:20:28 EDT)
  • Re: Blaster author identified, about to be arrested... (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 11:38:06 EDT)
• Nathan Eric Norman
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:01:44 EDT)
• Nathan J. Mehl
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:11:32 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 02:12:46 EDT)
• neal rauhauser
  • Blacklisting: obvious P2P app (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:21:23 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 12:14:50 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Cisco 4x00 rails) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 07:37:04 EDT)
• Neil J. McRae
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 07:24:15 EDT)
  • Re: change to the COM and NET TLD (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 03:40:54 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 03:09:07 EDT)
  • Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 10:55:24 EDT)
  • Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 10:39:08 EDT)
  • Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 09:23:35 EDT)
  • Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 09:13:51 EDT)
• Neil Ronketti
  • RE: ethernet-based temperature sensors (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 12:16:06 EDT)
• Nenad Pudar
  • Re: IPv6 vs IPv4 (Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now?) (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 17:18:23 EDT)
  • Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 16:34:18 EDT)
  • Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 15:11:55 EDT)
  • Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 14:25:20 EDT)
  • Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 11:32:34 EDT)
• netadm
  • RE: Re[2]: williams spamhaus blacklist (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 11:58:16 EDT)
  • RE: Re[2]: williams spamhaus blacklist (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 09:02:54 EDT)
• Niaz, Wajahat
  • RE: Cisco IOS Failure due to Virus (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 01:51:14 EDT)
• nicholas harteau
  • NANOG 29 registration problems. (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 11:55:48 EDT)
• Nick A Montante
  • Migrating DSL Agg from Redback to Cisco (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 04:57:10 EDT)
• Niels Bakker
  • Re: Verisign's Threat to Infrastructure Stability (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 07:14:16 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:53:41 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 14:52:56 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:45:40 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign suggestion (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:33:08 EDT)
  • What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 18:56:57 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 13:37:40 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 12:59:25 EDT)
• Nine, Jason
  • RE: Where to get an ASN certificate? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:37:47 EDT)
  • FW: Where to get an ASN certificate? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:02:07 EDT)
• Olivier Bonaventure
  • A web interface to check the consistency of RPSL policies (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 16:15:39 EDT)
• Omachonu Ogali
  • Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:21:53 EDT)
  • Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 10:41:56 EDT)
• Owen DeLong
  • ARIN policy proposals of interest (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 22:13:53 EDT)
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:07:21 EDT)
  • Re: ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:46:35 EDT)
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:26:57 EDT)
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:24:16 EDT)
  • Re: "Class A Data Center" (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:44:45 EDT)
  • Re: Windows updates and dial up users (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 13:40:17 EDT)
  • Re: Windows updates and dial up users (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 13:11:00 EDT)
  • Re: Windows updates and dial up users (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 13:07:45 EDT)
  • Re: Windows updates and dial up users (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 13:02:57 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 13:04:06 EDT)
  • Re: If Verisign *really* wants to help ... (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 12:56:22 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:05:08 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 17:56:41 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 17:46:33 EDT)
  • RE: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:49:17 EDT)
  • RE: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:42:13 EDT)
  • RE: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:23:28 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:02:52 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 12:51:05 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:06:32 EDT)
  • Re: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:01:38 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:57:05 EDT)
  • RE: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:07:26 EDT)
  • RE: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:54:25 EDT)
  • Re: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:50:01 EDT)
• Pascal Gloor
  • Cisco introduced 'warm' reload... (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 06:19:46 EDT)
• Patrick
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 12:11:04 EDT)
  • RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:40:56 EDT)
  • Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 12:50:51 EDT)
  • Re: anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening) (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 18:40:57 EDT)
  • Re: CalPOP contact? HTTP CONNECT scanning (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 20:34:29 EDT)
• Patrick Muldoon
  • Verisign's New Change and Outdate RBL's (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:39:14 EDT)
• Patrick W. Gilmore
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:40:33 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:34:36 EDT)
• Paul Timmins
  • Re: Converting from telco Major-V, Major-H coordinates to Lat Long (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 13:22:03 EDT)
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 16:30:56 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 20:01:08 EDT)
  • RE: Tier-1 without their own backbone? (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 01:29:08 EDT)
• Paul Vixie
  • Re: ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:13:44 EDT)
  • Re: ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 03:34:57 EDT)
  • Re: Unauthorized DNS updates (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 23:29:26 EDT)
  • Re: ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 22:44:40 EDT)
  • Re: ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 18:46:36 EDT)
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 12:09:54 EDT)
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 12:05:36 EDT)
  • someone from attbi please contact me regarding host 24.129.84.175 (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 19:05:51 EDT)
  • Re: A list of (mostly) technical consequences of TLD wildcards (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 12:11:23 EDT)
  • Re: A list of (mostly) technical consequences of TLD wildcards (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 11:42:18 EDT)
  • workaround published for BIND8 and delegation-only (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 22:50:56 EDT)
  • Re: New CA Law (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:20:33 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:15:43 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 12:48:06 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 19:33:22 EDT)
  • Re: [Fwd: monkeys.dom UPL DNSBL being DDOSed to death] (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 19:17:44 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:06:59 EDT)
  • Re: bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards) (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 13:25:23 EDT)
  • Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 13:09:59 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 10:34:44 EDT)
  • Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 02:44:44 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 02:07:31 EDT)
  • Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 15:49:05 EDT)
  • Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 15:37:03 EDT)
  • Re: Appreciation for Bind patches (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:36:53 EDT)
  • Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 17:13:56 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 16:05:27 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 15:47:15 EDT)
  • Re: bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards) (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 15:29:41 EDT)
  • bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards) (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 11:56:51 EDT)
  • Sven-Haegar Koch: Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:23:49 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:11:56 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 18:03:11 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 17:49:39 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:52:46 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:55:32 EDT)
  • BIND 9 (Re: ISC Patches) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:46:19 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:34:08 EDT)
  • Re: public resolver (was: bind patch? (Re: What *are* they smoking?)) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:32:07 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 10:33:45 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 10:28:10 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 02:33:36 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 01:13:45 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 01:07:04 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:54:17 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:36:27 EDT)
  • Re: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:27:05 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:23:32 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:20:29 EDT)
  • bind patch? (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:15:43 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 12:40:30 EDT)
  • Re: On the back of other 'security' posts.... (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 21:45:41 EDT)
• Paul Wouters
  • Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 06:25:55 EDT)
• Pekka Savola
  • Re: Increase in tcp traffic from spoofed source to bogon? (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 05:23:44 EDT)
  • Re: New Team Cymru IP2ASN whois server (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 05:22:36 EDT)
• Pete Ashdown
  • Re: Alternative Satellite news feed needed (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 18:22:43 EDT)
• Pete Kruckenberg
  • Operations notification manager software (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 00:02:24 EDT)
• Pete Templin
  • RE: Converting from telco Major-V, Major-H coordinates to Lat Long (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:57:09 EDT)
• Peter E. Fry
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:02:08 EDT)
  • Re: BGP issues (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 17:29:31 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco Service Provider code - Any good? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:17:17 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco Service Provider code - Any good? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:42:02 EDT)
• Peter Galbavy
  • address harvesting analysis idea (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 14:00:07 EDT)
  • anyone from telia online (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:14:02 EDT)
• Peter Losher
  • ISC Patches (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 04:40:29 EDT)
• Petr Swedock
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 19:25:08 EDT)
• Petri Helenius
  • Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 11:31:16 EDT)
  • Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 09:06:22 EDT)
  • Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 18:28:27 EDT)
  • manure distribution (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 18:33:52 EDT)
  • Re: Inevitable Consequences--Verisign (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 10:22:49 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 02:08:59 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:03:59 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 09:14:24 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 08:17:38 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign vs ICANN (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 04:22:07 EDT)
  • site finder performance (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 07:10:01 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:15:49 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:38:06 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 04:29:27 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 17:50:18 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:15:30 EDT)
  • Re: IP telephony (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 05:41:46 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 03:45:34 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:31:01 EDT)
  • Re: certified idiots (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 01:57:18 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco IOS Failure due to Virus (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 07:41:34 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 15:21:59 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 14:51:41 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 14:48:20 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Sun Sep 07 2003 - 05:45:15 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 13:55:34 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:52:16 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:09:38 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:24:58 EDT)
  • Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 16:46:46 EDT)
  • Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 15:47:14 EDT)
  • Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 15:03:45 EDT)
• Rachael Treu
  • Re: OT: CPAN hacked or fubar'd? (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 17:33:12 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 19:47:41 EDT)
  • Re: Dynamic Internet Maps based on BGP table / AS_PATH (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 19:49:04 EDT)
• Rafi Sadowsky
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL list (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 05:14:35 EDT)
  • Re: Home Storage Area Network security (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 18:27:15 EDT)
  • Re: change to the COM and NET TLD (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 04:16:49 EDT)
• Randy Bush
  • Re: Proposed changes to the AUP. (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 17:52:14 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:55:41 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:42:23 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 19:52:29 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:15:46 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 17:20:00 EDT)
• ratul mahajan
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 21:50:08 EDT)
• ravi pina
  • Re: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:22:55 EDT)
• Ray
  • Re: list thoughts on "unsupported" hardware? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 15:39:46 EDT)
• Ray Bellis
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:24:12 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:22:34 EDT)
  • Re: GBLX contact? (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 06:53:42 EDT)
  • GBLX contact? (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 06:17:45 EDT)
• Ray Burkholder
  • Charlotte, NC Services Wanted (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:52:24 EDT)
• Ray Wong
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 19:41:34 EDT)
  • list thoughts on "unsupported" hardware? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 15:06:51 EDT)
  • Re: Some very strange network behaviors (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 18:15:41 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 13:55:14 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 13:32:42 EDT)
  • Re: BMITU (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 14:58:36 EDT)
• Raymond Dijkxhoorn
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:20:54 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 02:46:31 EDT)
  • monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:38:56 EDT)
• Regis M. Donovan
  • Re: SoBig volume way down (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 15:19:55 EDT)
• ren
  • consider fewer posts, more substance please... (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 16:05:39 EDT)
  • Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 10:50:51 EDT)
• Rich Braun
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 10:08:14 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:57:32 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:07:27 EDT)
• Richard A Steenbergen
  • Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 19:03:21 EDT)
  • Re: apathy (was Re: .ORG problems this evening) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:04:52 EDT)
  • Re: new openssh issue (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:33:03 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:15:29 EDT)
• Richard Cox
  • Re: Windows updates and dial up users (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 07:41:53 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 06:02:00 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:46:40 EDT)
  • Re: IP issues with .com/.net change? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:51:37 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:18:19 EDT)
  • Re: 157.112.0.0/16 ARIN info updated, AT&T still announcing /16 (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 13:01:47 EDT)
  • Re: dns.exe virus? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 18:10:16 EDT)
• Richard Irving
  • Re: Alternative Satellite news feed needed (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 13:55:16 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 16:42:13 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 16:23:44 EDT)
• Richard J.Sears
  • Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 14:49:08 EDT)
  • Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 14:41:19 EDT)
  • 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 13:42:58 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco IOS Failure due to Virus (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 00:26:20 EDT)
  • Cisco IOS Failure due to Virus (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 22:58:38 EDT)
• Richard Welty
  • Re[3]: williams spamhaus blacklist (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 07:51:30 EDT)
  • Re[2]: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 19:42:39 EDT)
  • Re[2]: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:57:24 EDT)
• Rik van Riel
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL list (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 12:04:54 EDT)
  • Re: A list of (mostly) technical consequences of TLD wildcards (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 11:49:00 EDT)
  • Re: A list of (mostly) technical consequences of TLD wildcards (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 11:29:57 EDT)
• Rob Pickering
  • Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:03:57 EDT)
• Rob Thomas
  • Re: Adjusting TCP windows on production systems? (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 18:06:20 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 17:53:23 EDT)
  • Weekly lamer report (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 07:32:28 EDT)
  • Weekly lamer report (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 06:29:49 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 12:56:36 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 02:15:31 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 17:30:35 EDT)
  • Weekly lamer list (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 04:18:32 EDT)
• Robert A. Hayden
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:07:08 EDT)
• Robert Blayzor
  • Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:27:26 EDT)
  • Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 17:01:02 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 16:43:58 EDT)
  • Re: Looking for clue at NetSOL/Verisign (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 09:29:38 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco IOS Failure due to Virus (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 23:17:01 EDT)
  • Fibertech Networks Contact (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 10:36:12 EDT)
• Robert Boyle
  • Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 22:26:00 EDT)
  • Re: Cheap temperature sensors (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 08:38:16 EDT)
  • Cheap temperature sensors (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 00:10:25 EDT)
  • Re: BMITU (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 18:20:14 EDT)
  • Re: BMITU (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 17:26:15 EDT)
  • Re: BMITU (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 13:36:53 EDT)
• Robert Bridgham
  • RE: BMITU (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 14:23:37 EDT)
• RoDent
  • Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:02:59 EDT)
• Rodney Dunn
  • Re: Cisco introduced 'warm' reload... (Sun Sep 14 2003 - 21:13:29 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco introduced 'warm' reload... (Sun Sep 14 2003 - 18:54:28 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco introduced 'warm' reload... (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 18:54:57 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco introduced 'warm' reload... (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 10:34:08 EDT)
  • Re: cef/process switching problem (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 12:10:42 EDT)
• Rodney Joffe
  • Re: apathy (was Re: .ORG problems this evening) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 12:48:20 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:42:56 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:47:45 EDT)
  • Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 12:30:01 EDT)
  • Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 10:01:55 EDT)
  • Important changes to the .org tld today. (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 09:03:15 EDT)
• Roland Perry
  • Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:05:43 EDT)
• Ron da Silva
  • Re: AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https - resolved (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 08:34:33 EDT)
  • Re: AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https - resolved (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 19:24:14 EDT)
• Ron Snyder
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 18:04:17 EDT)
• Ross Wm. Rader
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:37:30 EDT)
• Roy
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 15:39:57 EDT)
  • Neeed a new RFC? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:46:55 EDT)
  • Verisign's legal woes??? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:50:45 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:29:43 EDT)
• Roy Bentley
  • Re: Windows updates and dial up users (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 07:13:15 EDT)
  • Re: Route failures to behosting.com (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 22:09:45 EDT)
• Ryan Dobrynski
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:09:55 EDT)
• Ryan Tucker
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:38:18 EDT)
• Sabri Berisha
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 15:41:07 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:11:03 EDT)
• Saku Ytti
  • Re: The Cidr Report (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 09:12:14 EDT)
• Sam Hayes Merritt, III
  • RE: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:53:34 EDT)
• Scott A. McIntyre
  • Re: Virus uptick? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:01:57 EDT)
• Scott Francis
  • Re: "Class A Data Center" (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:47:15 EDT)
  • Re: "Class A Data Center" (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:20:25 EDT)
  • Re: On the back of other 'security' posts.... (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 17:07:43 EDT)
• Scott Granados
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 19:28:52 EDT)
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:36:39 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:08:33 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 19:14:39 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:37:07 EDT)
• Scott McGrath
  • Re: ethernet-based temperature sensors (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:03:25 EDT)
• Scylla Malengase
  • mpls provisioning (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 22:07:35 EDT)
• Sean Donelan
  • Network abuse - Phone Wars (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 18:05:25 EDT)
  • Don't like it, order the ISPs to block it (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 14:47:08 EDT)
  • Re: ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 19:12:06 EDT)
  • ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 17:31:44 EDT)
  • Italy: the latest member of the blackout club (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 00:44:04 EDT)
  • Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 19:30:20 EDT)
  • College increases fine for virus computers to $100 (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 03:02:24 EDT)
  • More ports to block (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:30:08 EDT)
  • Windows updates and dial up users (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 18:25:50 EDT)
  • Home Storage Area Network security (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 17:58:48 EDT)
  • Re: Any actual data to back up blocking Netbios ports? (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 00:17:22 EDT)
  • Re: Any actual data to back up blocking Netbios ports? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 23:08:03 EDT)
  • Any actual data to back up blocking Netbios ports? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 22:27:23 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:01:27 EDT)
  • Re: If Verisign *really* wants to help ... (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:28:47 EDT)
  • When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 16:45:09 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 16:01:23 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 15:36:40 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 10:48:32 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 01:39:56 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:50:29 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:48:09 EDT)
  • Microsoft announces new ways to bypass security controls (Sun Sep 14 2003 - 22:03:32 EDT)
  • Sabotage not backhoes: More cable cuts (Sun Sep 14 2003 - 02:25:49 EDT)
  • MIT still has over 900 network drops disabled (Sun Sep 14 2003 - 01:55:18 EDT)
  • Rumor: Microsoft preparing a new patch/service pack CD (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 19:32:23 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 23:23:48 EDT)
  • "Free" cleaning tools for worms (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:46:19 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 13:40:01 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 13:35:41 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 21:44:32 EDT)
  • Don't forget about physical security - Australia (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 02:12:45 EDT)
  • Re: More on the DDoS Attack (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 19:54:04 EDT)
  • FBI investigating fibercut in Washington State (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 00:34:02 EDT)
  • More universities take action to block unpatched/infected computers (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 23:09:03 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 13:14:54 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:51:29 EDT)
• Shawn Jackson
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:51:07 EDT)
  • RE: Route failures to behosting.com (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:51:56 EDT)
• Shawn Solomon
  • FW: Cidera Service Shutting Down (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 10:59:28 EDT)
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:43:59 EDT)
• Shon Elliott
  • Re: Alert to Phone/Pager System (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 18:39:40 EDT)
• Simon Lockhart
  • Re: FW: e-bay (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:26:43 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign vs ICANN (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 15:37:14 EDT)
• Simon Lyall
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:37:02 EDT)
• Simon Waters
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 07:53:58 EDT)
• Spencer Wood
  • Re: ethernet-based temperature sensors (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 16:21:13 EDT)
• St. Clair, James
  • RE: Don't forget about physical security - Australia (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 15:00:29 EDT)
• Stefan Baltus
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 09:35:31 EDT)
  • New prefix (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 10:56:24 EDT)
• Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • Re: Operations notification manager software (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 08:20:02 EDT)
  • [Administrativia] Posting rules: are messages silently dropped? (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 08:18:45 EDT)
• Stephen Gill
  • RE: New Team Cymru IP2ASN whois server (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 11:16:12 EDT)
  • New Team Cymru IP2ASN whois server (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 02:52:55 EDT)
• Stephen J. Wilcox
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:54:17 EDT)
  • Re: what to do about joe-jobs? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:26:59 EDT)
  • 419 with a twist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 09:09:56 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:15:08 EDT)
  • Re: Windows updates and dial up users (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 07:19:29 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN asks VeriSign to pull redirect service (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 06:55:57 EDT)
  • Re: Windows updates and dial up users (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 06:45:13 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 13:00:48 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 11:17:34 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 06:08:27 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 14:37:58 EDT)
  • Bye Snubby, hello Mail Rejector (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 05:39:34 EDT)
  • Re: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 18:51:08 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:28:51 EDT)
  • Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:16:10 EDT)
  • Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:07:23 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:10:00 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign changes violates RFC2821, and spam implications (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 07:36:41 EDT)
  • Re: blocking AS30060 (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:40:07 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:29:12 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:28:50 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco IOS Failure due to Virus (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 08:56:55 EDT)
  • Re: Some very strange network behaviors (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 06:16:11 EDT)
  • Re: Cisco IOS Failure due to Virus (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 06:03:55 EDT)
  • RE: dns.exe virus? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:55:31 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 15:58:25 EDT)
• Stephen L Johnson
  • Re: what to do about joe-jobs? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:56:30 EDT)
  • Re: what to do about joe-jobs? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:10:43 EDT)
  • Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 13:50:14 EDT)
• Steve Atkins
  • More .com/.net issues (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 12:46:40 EDT)
• Steve Carter
  • Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 15:07:36 EDT)
• Steve Francis
  • Re: Adjusting TCP windows on production systems? (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 18:30:40 EDT)
  • Re: Adjusting TCP windows on production systems? (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 18:27:28 EDT)
  • Re: Adjusting TCP windows on production systems? (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 17:17:44 EDT)
  • zebra server redundancy (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 14:28:34 EDT)
• Steve Gibbard
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:36:21 EDT)
• Steve Linford
  • Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 15:11:32 EDT)
  • RE: Re[2]: williams spamhaus blacklist (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 11:01:09 EDT)
  • Re[2]: williams spamhaus blacklist (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 08:22:05 EDT)
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 03:29:42 EDT)
• steve uurtamo
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 16:58:59 EDT)
• Steven M. Bellovin
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 16:10:59 EDT)
  • Re: "Class A Data Center" (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:34:56 EDT)
  • Re: Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:58:57 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:25:29 EDT)
  • Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 14:16:41 EDT)
• Steven Schecter
  • Latency between Global Crossing & AT&T (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 23:55:47 EDT)
• Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS
  • RE: Converting from telco Major-V, Major-H coordinates to Lat Long (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 15:55:13 EDT)
  • RE: Converting from telco Major-V, Major-H coordinates to Lat Long (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 15:32:17 EDT)
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 01:05:36 EDT)
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL list (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 04:08:13 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign changes violates RFC2821, and spam implications (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 05:40:29 EDT)
• Susan Harris
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 09:08:27 EDT)
  • NANOG29 Topics (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 20:45:26 EDT)
• tad pedley
  • Large DMZ Security Designs ? (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 23:49:38 EDT)
• Temkin, David
  • Adjusting TCP windows on production systems? (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 15:44:03 EDT)
  • Address for making BGP changes w/ Qwest? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:05:10 EDT)
• Terry Baranski
  • RE: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 17:54:13 EDT)
  • RE: On the back of other 'security' posts.... (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 14:58:02 EDT)
• Tim Wilde
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:02:51 EDT)
• Timo Janhunen
  • Do not call on hold (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:54:54 EDT)
• Timo Mohre
  • Cisco IOS 12.3(2)T1 and warm-reload (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 16:34:00 EDT)
• Timothy Brown
  • European and Far East Connectivity in the US (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 13:26:09 EDT)
• Todd Christell
  • Re: Alert to Phone/Pager System (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 09:56:54 EDT)
• Todd Mitchell - lists
  • videotron contact (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:30:28 EDT)
• Todd Vierling
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 23:53:28 EDT)
  • Re: apathy (was Re: .ORG problems this evening) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:36:41 EDT)
  • apathy (was Re: .ORG problems this evening) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:36:49 EDT)
  • Re: anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:38:18 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:09:23 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 19:11:59 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:29:52 EDT)
  • Re: anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:38:18 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:22:19 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:09:23 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:01:18 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:52:29 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:44:23 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:39:17 EDT)
  • yo' grammar so funny (was Re: DNS anycast considered harmful) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:18:06 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:07:10 EDT)
  • Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:22:11 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:11:26 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:05:15 EDT)
  • Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:57:23 EDT)
  • Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:40:21 EDT)
  • Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:26:58 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign suggestion (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:24:40 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:19:01 EDT)
  • Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:12:26 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 07:50:09 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 07:38:38 EDT)
  • .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 00:50:28 EDT)
  • Re: BIND 9 (Re: ISC Patches) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:56:47 EDT)
  • Re: ISC Patches (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 09:33:02 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 09:27:13 EDT)
• Tomas Daniska
  • RE: [nanog]: Re: Cheap temperature sensors (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 08:56:39 EDT)
• Tomas Lund
  • RE: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:16:25 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:13:49 EDT)
• Tony Rall
  • Re: FW: e-bay (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:34:51 EDT)
• Tony Varriale
  • ATTBI/Comcast issue (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 18:13:12 EDT)
• Truman, Michelle, RTSLS
  • RE: bgp as-path info (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 11:15:42 EDT)
• Vachon, Scott
  • RE: SoBig volume way down (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 14:12:07 EDT)
• Vadim Antonov
  • RE: Blacklisting: obvious P2P app (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:43:18 EDT)
  • RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 16:05:07 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:41:10 EDT)
  • RE: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 20:09:52 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 19:13:53 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 18:31:43 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 18:17:18 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 05:50:51 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 03:30:30 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:58:41 EDT)
  • Re: BMITU (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 17:54:41 EDT)
  • RE: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 16:59:13 EDT)
  • RE: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 03:57:23 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 08:31:20 EDT)
• Vinny Abello
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:20:10 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:18:01 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:05:14 EDT)
• Vivien M.
  • RE: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 18:04:14 EDT)
  • RE: If Verisign *really* wants to help ... (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:59:54 EDT)
• wayne
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 23:11:08 EDT)
• Wayne Bogan
  • MPLS over Multilink PPP or Multilink Frame Relay (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 00:52:24 EDT)
• Wayne E. Bouchard
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 16:11:48 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:30:44 EDT)
• Wesley Vaux
  • RE: Proposed changes to the AUP. (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 10:18:03 EDT)
• Will Yardley
  • Re: Foundry BigIron series (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 19:12:22 EDT)
  • Re: Foundry BigIron series (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 16:24:24 EDT)
  • Foundry BigIron series (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:54:46 EDT)
  • Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 03:30:33 EDT)
  • Re: blocking AS30060 (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:32:09 EDT)
  • Re: 157.112.0.0/16 ARIN info updated, AT&T still announcing /16 (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 12:36:36 EDT)
  • Re: CalPOP contact? HTTP CONNECT scanning (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 17:55:44 EDT)
• William Allen Simpson
  • Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 13:37:44 EDT)
  • bind 9.2.3rc3 successful (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 02:35:48 EDT)
  • Re: ISC Patches (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 10:56:31 EDT)
  • Re: root server owners? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 08:33:05 EDT)
  • root server owners? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:14:40 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 23:37:20 EDT)
  • Re: new openssh issue (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:08:38 EDT)
  • Re: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:27:50 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:24:29 EDT)
  • blocking AS30060 (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:04:18 EDT)
  • Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:50:37 EDT)
• William Caban
  • [OT] question on NANOG meetings (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 17:40:28 EDT)
• William Devine, II
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:29:19 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:45:09 EDT)
  • Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 14:39:47 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:59:17 EDT)
  • Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 14:56:10 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:14:59 EDT)
• William Warren
  • Re: Virus uptick? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:45:22 EDT)
• Wojtek Zlobicki
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 09:17:34 EDT)