Nanog 0309
By Author

1582 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
About this archive
Other mail archives

Starting: Mon Sep 01 2003 - 01:38:24 EDT
Ending: Tue Sep 30 2003 - 22:15:35 EDT

• (no email)
  • OT: co-lo DC Metro area non-rack-mount box? (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 11:28:38 EDT)
  • Did cambrian go to "business hours only" contact/noc numbers? (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 14:18:23 EDT)
  • RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:35:08 EDT)
  • RE: Interesting interaction between Blaster worm variants and Verisign DNS change (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:33:15 EDT)
  • Interesting interaction between Blaster worm variants and Verisign DNS change (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 23:29:16 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:36:37 EDT)
  • RE: "Class A Data Center" (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 16:19:21 EDT)
  • Verio is reporting outage at 401 N. B. (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 13:47:41 EDT)
• (no name)
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 18:45:04 EDT)
  • Converting from telco Major-V, Major-H coordinates to Lat Long (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:06:04 EDT)
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:04:36 EDT)
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:48:51 EDT)
  • Knock, Noc... Whos there? (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:27:07 EDT)
  • Re: ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 05:33:02 EDT)
  • Yet another address harvesting analysis idea (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 05:13:47 EDT)
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 05:01:49 EDT)
  • Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 22:37:05 EDT)
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 12:32:03 EDT)
  • Re: address harvesting analysis idea (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 12:53:11 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed changes to the AUP. (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:09:58 EDT)
  • RE: Detecting a non-existent domain (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:22:06 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed changes to the AUP. (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 11:55:33 EDT)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 08:00:00 EDT)
  • Re: Average case performance vs. Worst-case guarantee (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 02:54:56 EDT)
  • Re: AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https - resolved (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 20:25:01 EDT)
  • Re: Proposed changes to the AUP. (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 17:47:40 EDT)
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 13:31:16 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 05:11:07 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 04:54:17 EDT)
  • Re: 419 with a twist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 23:52:46 EDT)
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 19:44:58 EDT)
  • RE: what to do about joe-jobs? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 20:32:49 EDT)
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:14:04 EDT)
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:03:25 EDT)
  • Re: Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen) (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:17:21 EDT)
  • RE: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:58:02 EDT)
  • Re: what to do about joe-jobs? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:19:45 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 07:06:04 EDT)
  • Independent Technical Review Panel (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 04:27:11 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 22:05:03 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:12:11 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:32:01 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:47:25 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:17:05 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 11:43:03 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 08:34:06 EDT)
  • comments on addressing futures.... (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 18:22:47 EDT)
  • Re: Windows updates and dial up users (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 11:00:51 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign's Threat to Infrastructure Stability (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 05:57:17 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 05:42:51 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 05:09:35 EDT)
  • Re: Windows updates and dial up users (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 22:04:54 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 22:00:16 EDT)
  • Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 19:53:49 EDT)
  • Quantifying SiteFinder Traffic (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 16:28:25 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign abusing .COM/.NET monopoly, BIND releases new (fwd) (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 16:15:45 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 09:50:58 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign vs ICANN (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 02:28:38 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 22:39:47 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:12:46 EDT)
  • Re: If Verisign *really* wants to help ... (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 16:22:26 EDT)
  • Wildcards: ICANN and IAB posted their commentaries (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 21:37:41 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 19:06:41 EDT)
  • RE: routing issue? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 17:05:04 EDT)
  • routing issue? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 16:15:20 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:19:15 EDT)
  • Re: FW: Where to get an ASN certificate? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:11:18 EDT)
  • diversion... (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:09:42 EDT)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 08:00:00 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 21:17:28 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 19:24:40 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:06:04 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:10:57 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:00:58 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:36:37 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:39:51 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:00:53 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:29:06 EDT)
  • Re: "Class A Data Center" (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:45:03 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:34:12 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:57:13 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 06:42:19 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 06:24:49 EDT)
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 04:40:01 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign suggestion (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:16:14 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 00:07:57 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:32:10 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:29:33 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 18:39:27 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:46:39 EDT)
  • Re: new openssh issue (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:41:52 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:13:24 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 06:17:20 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 22:08:25 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:46:31 EDT)
  • Re: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:44:13 EDT)
  • Re: Heads up -- potential problems in 3.7, too? [Fwd: OpenSSH Security Advisory: buffer.adv] (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 22:48:16 EDT)
  • Re: Heads up -- potential problems in 3.7, too? [Fwd: OpenSSH Security Advisory: buffer.adv] (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 20:58:13 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:18:30 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:22:34 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:57:54 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:17:45 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:00:45 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:06:44 EDT)
  • Re: new openssh issue (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:50:04 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:00:04 EDT)
  • Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:18:58 EDT)
  • Re: new openssh issue (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:50:04 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:06:44 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:27:08 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:17:45 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:08:11 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:00:45 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:57:54 EDT)
  • Detroit Area (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:22:58 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:59:40 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign's New Change and Outdate RBL's (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 08:41:57 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:46:31 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:11:12 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 17:14:36 EDT)
  • Detroit Area (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 13:07:53 EDT)
  • Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 23:17:39 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 16:05:03 EDT)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 08:00:00 EDT)
  • RE: Alert to Phone/Pager System (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 21:55:30 EDT)
  • SoBig volume way down (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 14:03:03 EDT)
  • Re: paging AS226 : 63/8 does not belong to you (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 16:31:05 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 11:45:03 EDT)
  • Re: Fun new policy at AOL (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 06:39:24 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 22:37:18 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 22:13:41 EDT)
  • Re: dns.exe virus? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 17:36:47 EDT)
  • Re: wire rate filtering and policy routing (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 14:54:47 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 12:10:07 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 12:01:51 EDT)
  • Re: BMITU (Sun Sep 07 2003 - 01:46:40 EDT)
  • Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 07:38:57 EDT)
  • Re: zebra server redundancy (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 13:33:59 EDT)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 08:00:00 EDT)
  • Re: ethernet-based temperature sensors (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 04:49:02 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:31:03 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:28:08 EDT)
  • RE: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:01:52 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 21:47:39 EDT)
  • Re: Hey, QWEST clean up your network (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 19:08:22 EDT)
  • Re: Verio is reporting outage at 401 N. B. (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 14:11:16 EDT)
• -
  • Re: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:22:54 EDT)
• /m
  • RR (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 16:11:35 EDT)
• Aaron Dewell
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 15:44:59 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:46:15 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:01:15 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 20:19:11 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 12:19:49 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 11:18:15 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:21:58 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:21:24 EDT)
• Aaron Hopkins
  • Re: address harvesting analysis idea (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 16:38:58 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:19:21 EDT)
• Adam 'Starblazer' Romberg
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:39:20 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:28:51 EDT)
  • RE: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:24:29 EDT)
• Adam Atkinson
  • RE: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 06:40:00 EDT)
• Adam Debus
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 13:34:35 EDT)
• Adam Hall
  • Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 10:08:35 EDT)
• Adam Langley
  • Verisign Countermeasures - BIND and djbdns patches (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:04:07 EDT)
• Adam Rothschild
  • Roll call, custom IPG support (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 13:11:55 EDT)
• Alan Hannan
  • let the lawsuits begin (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 21:00:22 EDT)
• Alan Spicer
  • Re: ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 17:42:19 EDT)
  • Re: ISPs blocking port 53? (was Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 04:28:08 EDT)
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 20:05:47 EDT)
• Alex Bligh
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:23:27 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 04:45:29 EDT)
• Alex Kamantauskas
  • IP issues with .com/.net change? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:17:08 EDT)
• Alex Lambert
  • Heads up -- potential problems in 3.7, too? [Fwd: OpenSSH Security Advisory: buffer.adv] (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 19:37:50 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:17:23 EDT)
  • Re[2]: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:59:44 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:40:14 EDT)
• Alex Rubenstein
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:53:04 EDT)
• Alexander Kiwerski
  • Rogers Cable Contact (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 17:51:50 EDT)
• Allan Liska
  • Re: root server owners? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:27:43 EDT)
  • Re[2]: Alert to Phone/Pager System (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 18:42:38 EDT)
  • Alert to Phone/Pager System (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 17:45:43 EDT)
• Andrew Fried
  • Appreciation for Bind patches (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:14:34 EDT)
• Andrew Staples
  • Networks dropping all ICMP (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 11:47:21 EDT)
• Andy Dills
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:23:16 EDT)
• Andy Ellifson
  • Re: Converting from telco Major-V, Major-H coordinates to Lat Long (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 11:29:11 EDT)
  • Re: AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https - resolved (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 19:48:11 EDT)
  • Go Daddy vs Verisign over Site Finder (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 19:07:13 EDT)
  • Qwest.Net/USWest.Net SWIP Contact for 63.224.0.0/13? (Sun Sep 07 2003 - 13:46:12 EDT)
• Andy Grosser
  • Summary of responses: Lucent/Avaya Cajun experiences (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:08:49 EDT)
  • Lucent/Avaya Cajun experiences (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 21:02:27 EDT)
• Andy Johnson
  • Re: TnT ethernet card fix? (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 16:51:17 EDT)
• Andy Smith
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 08:31:21 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign changes violates RFC2821, and spam implications (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 06:07:28 EDT)
• Andy Walden
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 21:25:29 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 16:09:20 EDT)
  • Re: Cheap temperature sensors (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 09:51:02 EDT)
  • Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 16:37:19 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:36:56 EDT)
  • Re: IP issues with .com/.net change? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:44:43 EDT)
  • Re: Max TNT ping thing (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 17:36:36 EDT)
  • Re: OT: converting 100MB to OC-3 POS (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 08:26:46 EDT)
• Anthony Cennami
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 08:31:28 EDT)
• Ariel Biener
  • Re: Riverhead or Lancope? (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 06:58:41 EDT)
• Austad, Jay
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:19:20 EDT)
  • RE: list thoughts on "unsupported" hardware? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 15:33:28 EDT)
  • RE: cef/process switching problem (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 11:33:54 EDT)
  • cef/process switching problem (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 11:07:40 EDT)
  • RE: SNMP OID's for BGP monitoring (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 13:34:16 EDT)
  • SNMP OID's for BGP monitoring (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 11:23:29 EDT)
  • RE: BMITU (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 14:22:57 EDT)
  • Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:07:48 EDT)
  • RE: bgp as-path info (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 14:18:59 EDT)
  • bgp as-path info (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 14:00:31 EDT)
• Avery Buffington
  • FW: Sendmail 8.12.9 prescan bug (a new one) [CAN-2003-0694] (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 17:06:46 EDT)
• Avleen Vig
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 20:46:37 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 01:07:43 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 01:01:27 EDT)
  • Re: new openssh issue (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:26:57 EDT)
  • Verisign changes violates RFC2821 (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 07:54:40 EDT)
• Baldwin, James
  • RE: Italy: the latest member of the blackout club (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 00:50:36 EDT)
• Ben Browning
  • ATTN: Anyone with RBL clue at att.net (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 17:01:23 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 18:53:44 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:02:48 EDT)
• Ben Crosby
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:29:27 EDT)
• bert hubert
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 14:27:53 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 10:17:25 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 05:11:27 EDT)
  • Re: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:30:37 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Countermeasures - BIND and djbdns patches (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:59:47 EDT)
• Bill Owens
  • OT - fiber optic power meter for 1383 nm (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 11:36:10 EDT)
  • Re: ethernet-based temperature sensors (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:26:00 EDT)
  • IPv4/IPv6 issues (was Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now?) (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 15:28:00 EDT)
• Bob German
  • RE: Home Storage Area Network security (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 20:23:30 EDT)
  • RE: Home Storage Area Network security (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 19:37:53 EDT)
  • RE: "Class A Data Center" (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:58:31 EDT)
  • "Class A Data Center" (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:08:43 EDT)
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:11:37 EDT)
  • ChoiceOne issues today? (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 12:11:57 EDT)
  • RE: ethernet-based temperature sensors (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 10:06:08 EDT)
• Brandon Butterworth
  • Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 09:46:37 EDT)
  • Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 03:23:46 EDT)
• Brandon Ross
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 21:42:19 EDT)
• Braun, Mike
  • RE: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:32:24 EDT)
• Bret Baptist
  • BGP issues (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:04:15 EDT)
• Brian Boles
  • Earthlink Connectivity? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 17:36:51 EDT)
• Brian Bruns
  • Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 21:38:31 EDT)
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 17:59:40 EDT)
  • Re: AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https - resolved (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 18:11:23 EDT)
  • Re: AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 14:30:41 EDT)
  • Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:09:16 EDT)
  • Re: Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:20:22 EDT)
  • Re: Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 12:40:27 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:28:43 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:16:23 EDT)
  • Re: Route failures to behosting.com (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:29:57 EDT)
• Bruce Beckwith
  • FW: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 12:43:07 EDT)
• Bruce Campbell
  • Re: Verisign changes violates RFC2821, and spam implications (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 09:45:30 EDT)
  • RE: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:14:06 EDT)
• Buhrmaster, Gary
  • RE: new openssh issue (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:23:40 EDT)
• CA Windon
  • RE: ICMP Blocking Woes (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 16:12:20 EDT)
  • ICMP Blocking Woes (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:43:14 EDT)
• Carol Wadsworth
  • NANOG 29 (Chicago) Meeting Information (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:31:56 EDT)
• Carrara, Richard
  • Experience with McLeodUSA (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 13:53:56 EDT)
• Casassa, Nathan
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 22:01:11 EDT)
• Chan, Chung Ming
  • Costs of not testing an implementation (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:44:44 EDT)
• Charles Sprickman
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 17:32:13 EDT)
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 17:29:30 EDT)
• Chistos Xenofontas Dimitropoulos
  • pathchar servers (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 02:41:53 EDT)
• Chris Adams
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 21:11:11 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:05:40 EDT)
  • Re: ISC Patches (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 10:35:53 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:14:24 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:51:04 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:54:00 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:24:24 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:10:46 EDT)
  • Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 14:47:32 EDT)
  • Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 14:32:43 EDT)
  • Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 13:52:58 EDT)
• Chris Boyd
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 23:00:58 EDT)
• Chris Horry
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 14:53:12 EDT)
  • Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:40:15 EDT)
• Chris Lewis
  • Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 16:38:56 EDT)
  • Re: [Fwd: monkeys.dom UPL DNSBL being DDOSed to death] (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:56:51 EDT)
  • Re: [Fwd: monkeys.dom UPL DNSBL being DDOSed to death] (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:36:55 EDT)
  • Re: 157.112.0.0/16 ARIN info updated, AT&T still announcing /16 (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 15:13:39 EDT)
  • Re: dns.exe virus? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 17:30:28 EDT)
  • Re: dns.exe virus? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:52:07 EDT)
  • Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:01:06 EDT)
• Chris Roberts
  • Verisign HOWTO (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 06:49:54 EDT)
• Chris Woodfield
  • Re: relays.osirusoft.com (Wed Aug 27 2003 - 13:47:31 EDT)
  • Re: Address for making BGP changes w/ Qwest? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 15:59:01 EDT)
• Christopher Bird
  • RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 16:23:22 EDT)
  • Digest from questions about IPTelephony (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 09:21:57 EDT)
  • RE: IP telephony - Thank you all for insights and answers - no new content in message, but I wanted to acknowledge all who took the time! (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 07:33:58 EDT)
  • IP telephony (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:38:53 EDT)
  • Some very strange network behaviors (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 00:39:25 EDT)
• Christopher J. Wolff
  • RADB (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:13:40 EDT)
  • RE: dns.exe virus? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 19:10:36 EDT)
  • RE: dns.exe virus? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:52:41 EDT)
  • dns.exe virus? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:10:09 EDT)
• Christopher L. Morrow
  • Re: If Verisign *really* wants to help ... (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 17:24:03 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 19:15:26 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:30:48 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:28:05 EDT)
  • RE: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 02:46:21 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 12:52:53 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 02:37:57 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:44:27 EDT)
• Christopher X. Candreva
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 09:20:27 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:38:27 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:21:33 EDT)
  • Vote early... (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:01:19 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Countermeasures - BIND and djbdns patches (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:05:45 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:10:04 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:56:01 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:35:08 EDT)
• chuck goolsbee
  • Re: Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 14:32:07 EDT)
  • Re: Anyone here from Earthlink? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 21:03:34 EDT)
  • Anyone here from Earthlink? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 11:51:37 EDT)
• Cliff Albert
  • Re: New prefix (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 11:18:55 EDT)
• Colin Brown
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:42:06 EDT)
• Craig A. Huegen
  • Submit your comments on Verisign's SiteFinder service to ICANN (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 18:32:12 EDT)
• Crist Clark
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 20:58:49 EDT)
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 20:22:25 EDT)
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:02:26 EDT)
  • Re: Increase in tcp traffic from spoofed source to bogon? (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:56:34 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:25:35 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 17:37:19 EDT)
  • Re: Some very strange network behaviors (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 17:49:56 EDT)
  • Re: Some very strange network behaviors (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 16:35:37 EDT)
• Curt Akin
  • Inevitable Consequences--Verisign (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 09:36:20 EDT)
  • Verisign's Threat to Infrastructure Stability (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 10:30:27 EDT)
• Damian Gerow
  • Re: Proposed changes to the AUP. (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 17:43:38 EDT)
  • Re: Blacklisting: obvious P2P app (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:44:36 EDT)
  • Re: Operations notification manager software (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 09:45:30 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:34:16 EDT)
  • Re: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 18:58:13 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:26:28 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:54:38 EDT)
  • Re: Weekly lamer report (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 10:33:03 EDT)
• Dan Armstrong
  • Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 14:04:45 EDT)
  • Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:11:08 EDT)
• Dan Hollis
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 16:31:14 EDT)
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 16:28:59 EDT)
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 22:10:45 EDT)
  • RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:53:30 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 19:56:59 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:10:56 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:08:27 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:15:48 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 16:05:19 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:28:40 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:13:22 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 00:43:48 EDT)
  • Re: Any actual data to back up blocking Netbios ports? (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 00:12:02 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:09:12 EDT)
  • Re: 157.112.0.0/16 ARIN info updated, AT&T still announcing /16 (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 14:18:20 EDT)
  • Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 14:29:29 EDT)
• Dan Riley
  • Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 12:40:52 EDT)
• Daniel Karrenberg
  • Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 09:08:18 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 03:23:14 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 10:51:11 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 04:13:58 EDT)
  • Re: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 03:31:26 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 03:26:36 EDT)
  • Re: Dynamic Internet Maps based on BGP table / AS_PATH (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 03:33:37 EDT)
  • Re: Dynamic Internet Maps based on BGP table / AS_PATH (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 03:30:26 EDT)
• Daniel Roesen
  • Re: Detecting a non-existent domain (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:43:09 EDT)
  • Re: Detecting a non-existent domain (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:47:44 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 06:18:32 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:45:19 EDT)
• Daniel Senie
  • Re: Microsoft announces new ways to bypass security controls (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 10:40:14 EDT)
  • RE: On the back of other 'security' posts.... (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 21:03:24 EDT)
• Darren Foo
  • RE: What about joe-jobs? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 13:13:39 EDT)
• Daryl G. Jurbala
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:53:38 EDT)
  • OT: Alpharetta, GA fast turnup? (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 11:41:50 EDT)
• Dave Crocker
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 19:58:08 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:07:54 EDT)
• Dave Stewart
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 23:02:45 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 14:16:34 EDT)
• David B Harris
  • Re: Bye Snubby, hello Mail Rejector (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:10:06 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:51:50 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign suggestion (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:42:26 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign suggestion (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 00:36:05 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:05:52 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:05:52 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 04:08:08 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:18:19 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:09:03 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:17:15 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:17:16 EDT)
• David Barak
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:46:33 EDT)
• David Diaz
  • Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 12:49:50 EDT)
• David G. Andersen
  • Re: anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening) (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 18:32:19 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 11:47:20 EDT)
• David Lesher
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 18:20:58 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 08:50:43 EDT)
  • Verisign Responds (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 17:43:21 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 06:44:34 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:36:26 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:54:15 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:55:31 EDT)
  • Re: Virus uptick? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:10:02 EDT)
  • Virus uptick? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:08:22 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:01:27 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:57:11 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 08:55:31 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 21:20:08 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 23:18:24 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft announces new ways to bypass security controls (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 11:32:05 EDT)
  • Re: (Slightly OT) Bandwidth in Belize (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 00:54:26 EDT)
  • Re: ethernet-based temperature sensors (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 21:34:37 EDT)
  • Re: ethernet-based temperature sensors (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 07:59:51 EDT)
• David Meyer
  • New routeviews service available (Address/Prefix -> AS/ASPATH mappings) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:50:38 EDT)
• David Raistrick
  • Re: what to do about joe-jobs? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:21:54 EDT)
  • Re: what to do about joe-jobs?, was: Re: Another DNS... (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:54:08 EDT)
  • what to do about joe-jobs?, was: Re: Another DNS... (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:48:27 EDT)
• David Schwartz
  • RE: Blacklisting: obvious P2P app (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 17:35:35 EDT)
  • RE: Detecting a non-existent domain (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 20:31:21 EDT)
  • RE: Detecting a non-existent domain (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 19:52:43 EDT)
  • RE: Detecting a non-existent domain (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:15:06 EDT)
  • RE: Detecting a non-existent domain (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:46:40 EDT)
  • RE: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 22:02:06 EDT)
  • RE: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 18:38:12 EDT)
  • RE: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 17:31:32 EDT)
  • RE: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 19:26:21 EDT)
  • RE: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:30:18 EDT)
  • RE: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 13:50:38 EDT)
  • RE: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 18:41:03 EDT)
  • RE: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 16:34:10 EDT)
  • RE: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 20:12:49 EDT)
• Dean Bogdanovic
  • Internetwork smarTest (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 17:36:31 EDT)
• Declan McCullagh
  • Re: Inevitable Consequences--Verisign (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 12:54:59 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 16:52:06 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 02:32:40 EDT)
• Deepak Jain
  • RE: williams spamhaus blacklist (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 14:19:03 EDT)
  • RE: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:30:53 EDT)
• Dennis Dayman
  • DS1 Question (Sun Sep 14 2003 - 14:32:55 EDT)
• Dominic J. Eidson
  • Re: Detecting a non-existent domain (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:24:32 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:45:28 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:20:06 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:11:12 EDT)
  • Re: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:58:46 EDT)
• Doron Shikmoni
  • Re: public resolver (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 09:26:01 EDT)
• Doug Barton
  • ICANN Secsac message to the board (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 21:55:26 EDT)
  • Re: Wildcards: ICANN and IAB posted their commentaries (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 01:05:01 EDT)
  • Re: BIND 9 (Re: ISC Patches) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 19:41:23 EDT)
  • Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 19:45:39 EDT)
• Douglas S. Peeples
  • RE: Need help with Ex-Pat project (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 09:05:59 EDT)
  • Need help with Ex-Pat project (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 11:55:15 EDT)
• Dr. Jeffrey Race
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 04:22:21 EDT)
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 21:55:53 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 05:22:26 EDT)
  • OT: Interesting visuals. interesting message, 560 kb, 5 min to run (if you have a moment) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:25:22 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:28:19 EDT)
• Drew Linsalata
  • Re: Latency between Global Crossing & AT&T (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 09:29:05 EDT)
  • Eureka/GGN Listening? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 17:07:44 EDT)
• Drew Weaver
  • Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 22:30:16 EDT)
  • TnT ethernet card fix? (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 16:46:04 EDT)
  • AOL people on list? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 10:22:17 EDT)
• Duane Wessels
  • A list of (mostly) technical consequences of TLD wildcards (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 18:49:11 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:53:58 EDT)
• Dwight Ringdahl
  • RE: Distributed sniffer products (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:42:07 EDT)
• E.B. Dreger
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 20:57:53 EDT)
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 03:03:48 EDT)
  • Re: anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening) (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 18:50:40 EDT)
  • If Verisign wants to cooperate (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 13:07:32 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 12:19:15 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign vs ICANN (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:13:49 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:44:25 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:10:31 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:54:06 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:44:25 EDT)
  • Re: anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:24:26 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:20:21 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:10:31 EDT)
  • anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:01:07 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:15:46 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:17:33 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:04:47 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:45:34 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:34:52 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:44:25 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:27:41 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign responds to complaints via press release (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 20:25:54 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 18:43:48 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 18:05:04 EDT)
  • Re: Where will Verisign stop? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:07:11 EDT)
  • Re: [Re: Change to .com/.net behavior] (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 12:38:23 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 01:37:49 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 21:27:13 EDT)
  • Re: Heads up -- potential problems in 3.7, too? [Fwd: OpenSSH Security Advisory: buffer.adv] (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 21:04:44 EDT)
  • Re: simple way to fix Verisign DNS issues (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:21:05 EDT)
  • Re: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:19:54 EDT)
  • Where will Verisign stop? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 03:38:24 EDT)
  • Re: Patching BIND (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 01:56:02 EDT)
  • Patching BIND (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 01:32:50 EDT)
• Ejay Hire
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 16:19:20 EDT)
  • RE: bgp as-path info (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 11:21:42 EDT)
• Eliot Lear
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 21:53:59 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 09:33:48 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:18:07 EDT)
  • [resend] OT: operators script writers' experience wanted (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 11:01:13 EDT)
• Eric A. Hall
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 15:50:03 EDT)
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 15:31:23 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 13:14:24 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 12:28:09 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 16:21:57 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 16:06:51 EDT)
• Eric Gauthier
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:31:19 EDT)
  • Re: More on the DDoS Attack (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 18:30:01 EDT)
  • Re: More on the DDoS Attack (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 10:38:53 EDT)
  • Re: More on the DDoS Attack (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 19:16:54 EDT)
• Eric Germann
  • RE: Converting from telco Major-V, Major-H coordinates to Lat Long (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 10:55:30 EDT)
  • VeriSign tapped to secure Internet voting (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 21:49:14 EDT)
  • RE: ICMP Blocking Woes (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 15:56:04 EDT)
  • RE: OT: CPAN hacked or fubar'd? (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 17:33:03 EDT)
  • OT: CPAN hacked or fubar'd? (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 17:10:58 EDT)
  • ICANN asks VeriSign to pull redirect service (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 22:42:37 EDT)
  • RE: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 22:09:34 EDT)
  • RE: apathy (was Re: .ORG problems this evening) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:51:42 EDT)
  • RE: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 08:01:14 EDT)
  • RE: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 21:19:57 EDT)
  • RE: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 21:16:18 EDT)
  • Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 18:08:47 EDT)
  • RE: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:20:06 EDT)
  • RE: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:10:34 EDT)
  • RE: dry pair (Mon Sep 01 2003 - 23:05:04 EDT)
• Eric Kagan
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 07:07:08 EDT)
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 07:04:52 EDT)
  • Re: someone from attbi please contact me regarding host 24.129.84.175 (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 20:31:44 EDT)
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 22:36:00 EDT)
• Eric Kuhnke
  • Shaw Cable/Big Pipe contact needed (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 20:41:40 EDT)
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 22:42:10 EDT)
• Eric Whitehill
  • AOL Postmaster contact? (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 15:35:53 EDT)
• Fisher, Shawn
  • RE: BMITU (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 13:09:25 EDT)
  • RE: BMITU (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:47:13 EDT)
  • BMITU (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:02:32 EDT)
• Frank
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 05:57:17 EDT)
• Fred Baker
  • RE: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:45:26 EDT)
• Gabriel
  • InterNAP (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 14:17:49 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? [OT] (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:27:58 EDT)
• Gary E. Miller
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 19:15:25 EDT)
• Geo.
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 06:22:06 EDT)
  • RE: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 11:27:11 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 21:11:12 EDT)
  • Re: Home Storage Area Network security (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 22:41:20 EDT)
  • Re: Home Storage Area Network security (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 20:14:42 EDT)
  • RE: TnT ethernet card fix? (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 16:40:27 EDT)
• George Bakos
  • Re: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:21:22 EDT)
• George William Herbert
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 21:56:18 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 17:22:57 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 04:21:18 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:04:03 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:11:40 EDT)
  • Re: Sabotage not backhoes: More cable cuts (Sun Sep 14 2003 - 17:10:33 EDT)
  • Re: Earthquake in the East Bay (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 23:45:27 EDT)
• Gerald
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 11:12:05 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:49:37 EDT)
  • RE: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:52:11 EDT)
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:16:36 EDT)
  • Verisign suggestion (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 00:25:48 EDT)
• Gerardo Gregory
  • Re: Address for making BGP changes w/ Qwest? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:18:49 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 10:48:43 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 17:28:23 EDT)
• Gil Levi
  • OT: converting 100MB to OC-3 POS (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 05:35:51 EDT)
• Graham Freeman
  • Re: Appreciation for Bind patches (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 20:01:41 EDT)
• Grant A. Kirkwood
  • Re: Latency between Global Crossing & AT&T (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 10:52:43 EDT)
• Greg Maxwell
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:01:25 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:23:51 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:53:17 EDT)
  • Re: Networks dropping all ICMP (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 13:28:05 EDT)
  • Re: Distributed sniffer products (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 10:43:11 EDT)
• Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
  • Re: Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen) (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 11:32:08 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:03:11 EDT)
• Gregory Hicks
  • Re: FW: e-bay (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 12:34:02 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 12:59:29 EDT)
  • Re: Some very strange network behaviors (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 17:30:42 EDT)
• Guy Coslado (GC0111)
  • The *.com/robots.txt (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:52:24 EDT)
• H. Michael Smith, Jr.
  • Dynamic Internet Maps based on BGP table / AS_PATH (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 17:02:27 EDT)
• Haesu
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:15:32 EDT)
  • Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 22:38:57 EDT)
  • Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 22:07:31 EDT)
  • Re: Inevitable Consequences--Verisign (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:24:26 EDT)
  • Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 02:50:50 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 21:58:04 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN asks VeriSign to pull redirect service (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 23:12:14 EDT)
  • Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 16:33:40 EDT)
  • Re: Route failures to behosting.com (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 23:53:13 EDT)
  • Re: Route failures to behosting.com (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:46:21 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign responds to complaints via press release (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 20:01:37 EDT)
  • Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 19:04:52 EDT)
  • Re: blocking AS30060 (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:29:27 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:59:06 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:16:28 EDT)
  • Re: zebra server redundancy (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 15:02:52 EDT)
• Hank Nussbacher
  • Re[2]: williams spamhaus blacklist (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 06:50:58 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 02:23:40 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:48:43 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 02:50:07 EDT)
  • Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 10:46:12 EDT)
• Harsha Narayan
  • Average case performance vs. Worst-case guarantee (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 18:22:48 EDT)
• Henry Linneweh
  • Re: VeriSign tapped to secure Internet voting (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 22:31:54 EDT)
  • Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 08:51:24 EDT)
  • Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 02:23:04 EDT)
  • Re: IP telephony (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:28:44 EDT)
  • Re: OT: converting 100MB to OC-3 POS (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 13:42:58 EDT)
• Henry Yen
  • Re: Windows updates and dial up users (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 11:01:36 EDT)
  • Re: routing issue? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 16:31:58 EDT)
  • Re: route to behosting.com (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 22:59:19 EDT)
  • Re: Route failures to behosting.com (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:35:54 EDT)
• Hermann Wecke
  • Cyber World Internet Services (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 15:13:09 EDT)
• Ian Mason
  • Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 19:33:52 EDT)
  • Real network failure causes Was: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 09:59:09 EDT)
  • Re: ethernet-based temperature sensors (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 10:11:35 EDT)
• Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 06:44:18 EDT)
  • Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:22:15 EDT)
  • Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:28:07 EDT)
  • Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 07:57:15 EDT)
  • Re: public resolver (was: bind patch? (Re: What *are* they smoking?)) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 06:55:41 EDT)
  • Re: BGP issues (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:38:12 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 08:10:32 EDT)
  • Re: public resolver (was: bind patch? (Re: What *are* they smoking?)) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 06:57:16 EDT)
  • Re: IP telephony (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 06:28:37 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 04:28:44 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 vs IPv4 (Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now?) (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 04:43:02 EDT)
  • Re: On the back of other 'security' posts.... (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 03:44:15 EDT)
• Ingevaldson, Dan (ISS Atlanta)
  • FW: ISS Security Brief: ProFTPD ASCII File Remote Compromise Vulnerability (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 11:52:45 EDT)
  • RE: new openssh issue (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:35:33 EDT)
  • RE: new openssh issue (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:00:57 EDT)
  • RE: ISS X-Force MS03-039 Free Scanner (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 18:45:48 EDT)
  • ISS X-Force MS03-039 Free Scanner (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 08:53:46 EDT)
  • ISS Security Brief: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Microsoft RPC Service (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 14:35:47 EDT)
• Jack Bates
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:46:06 EDT)
  • Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:04:44 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:26:16 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 11:48:44 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 09:56:28 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 09:51:43 EDT)
  • Re: Detecting a non-existent domain (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:37:57 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:32:55 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 16:11:48 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:48:38 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 14:10:14 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 13:18:20 EDT)
  • Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 13:01:39 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 12:11:53 EDT)
  • Re: bind 9.2.3rc3 successful (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 10:44:53 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN asks VeriSign to pull redirect service (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 10:26:43 EDT)
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 13:14:30 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 11:57:10 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 16:07:51 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 10:47:32 EDT)
  • Re: "Class A Data Center" (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 16:55:13 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:31:27 EDT)
  • Re: IP issues with .com/.net change? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 14:41:13 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 12:38:34 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 12:00:50 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 11:09:30 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 10:58:40 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:29:06 EDT)
  • Re: More on the DDoS Attack (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 11:41:27 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 15:12:15 EDT)
  • Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 15:16:34 EDT)
  • Re: BMITU (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 16:52:47 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 14:18:22 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 14:33:43 EDT)
  • Re: BMITU (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:32:23 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:30:04 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:20:55 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:15:23 EDT)
  • Re: IPv6 vs IPv4 (Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now?) (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:48:03 EDT)
  • Re: bgp as-path info (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 14:16:48 EDT)
• james
  • Re: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem (Fri Sep 12 2003 - 14:48:41 EDT)
• James Cowie
  • Re: what happened to ARIN tonight ? (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 06:27:15 EDT)
• Jan Czmok
  • Proxy posting: Worldcom DS3 hub down ? (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 09:16:33 EDT)
  • Cogentco/PSI BGP Admin around ? (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 05:24:03 EDT)
• Jared Mauch
  • Re: Converting from telco Major-V, Major-H coordinates to Lat Long (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 11:00:59 EDT)
  • Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 14:33:58 EDT)
  • Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:49:27 EDT)
  • Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:01:57 EDT)
  • Re: address harvesting analysis idea (Sun Sep 28 2003 - 16:50:31 EDT)
  • Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 03:28:57 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:22:40 EDT)
  • Re: Heads up -- potential problems in 3.7, too? [Fwd: OpenSSH Security Advisory: buffer.adv] (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 23:16:18 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:41:30 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:38:05 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 15:34:45 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 15:03:19 EDT)
  • Re: SNMP OID's for BGP monitoring (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 11:27:23 EDT)
  • Re: What were we saying about edge filtering? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 03:25:28 EDT)
  • IPv6 vs IPv4 (Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now?) (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 16:48:28 EDT)
  • Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 15:49:53 EDT)
  • Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 11:41:16 EDT)
• Jason Frisvold
  • Re: cef/process switching problem (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 11:24:14 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:39:39 EDT)
  • Cisco Service Provider code - Any good? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 13:48:14 EDT)
• Jason Garman
  • A quick examination of the VeriSign disaster (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:45:05 EDT)
• Jason Lewis
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 20:03:39 EDT)
• Jason Slagle
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:21:43 EDT)
• Jay Greenberg
  • Anybody from AT&T? (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 01:29:37 EDT)
• Jay Hennigan
  • Re: "Class A Data Center" (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:14:22 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:09:06 EDT)
  • Re: blocking AS30060 (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:58:08 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:39:18 EDT)
• Jay Kline
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 16:12:13 EDT)
• JC Dill
  • Re: Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists? (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 23:03:09 EDT)
  • California Spam-busting bill comes with $1 million penalty (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:33:30 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 20:08:51 EDT)
• Jeff S Wheeler
  • Re: BGP issues (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 23:25:00 EDT)
  • RE: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:58:02 EDT)
  • Re: SNMP OID's for BGP monitoring (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 19:19:29 EDT)
• Jeff Wasilko
  • VeriSign responds to complaints via press release (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 19:40:56 EDT)
  • Re: Heads up -- potential problems in 3.7, too? [Fwd: OpenSSH Security Advisory: buffer.adv] (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 21:03:38 EDT)
• Jeffrey Meltzer
  • Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings (Sat Sep 27 2003 - 03:31:34 EDT)
• Jeffrey Wheat
  • Alternative Satellite news feed needed (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 11:02:18 EDT)
• Jeroen Massar
  • RE: Yet another address harvesting analysis idea (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 05:34:03 EDT)
  • RE: New Team Cymru IP2ASN whois server (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 05:53:48 EDT)
  • RE: Verisign Responds (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 11:03:30 EDT)
  • RE: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 16:00:56 EDT)
  • RE: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:13:48 EDT)
  • RE: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:18:26 EDT)
  • RE: Re: CalPOP contact? HTTP CONNECT scanning] (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 13:14:39 EDT)
  • RE: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 07:11:56 EDT)
  • RE: Re: CalPOP contact? HTTP CONNECT scanning] (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 06:40:17 EDT)
  • RE: Important changes to the .org tld today. (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 11:37:35 EDT)
  • CalPOP contact? HTTP CONNECT scanning (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 20:17:52 EDT)
  • RE: IPv6 vs IPv4 (Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now?) (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:59:35 EDT)
• Jerry Eyers
  • Re: Windows updates and dial up users (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 08:38:23 EDT)
  • Just had an interesting side effect of the "V" hijack... (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:21:11 EDT)
  • Fw: Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:10:41 EDT)
  • ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:57:13 EDT)
• Jim Segrave
  • Re: Verisign Responds (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 05:20:33 EDT)
• Jim Shankland
  • Re: Appreciation for Bind patches (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 23:45:44 EDT)
  • Re: BMITU (Sun Sep 07 2003 - 01:11:41 EDT)
• Joe Abley
  • Re: FW: e-bay (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 15:01:14 EDT)
  • Re: Detecting a non-existent domain (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:57:27 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 18:00:24 EDT)
  • Re: FW: Where to get an ASN certificate? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 11:18:18 EDT)
  • Re: OT: converting 100MB to OC-3 POS (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 07:45:39 EDT)
  • Re: Real network failure causes Was: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 10:56:55 EDT)
• Joe Boyce
  • Re: SoBig volume way down (Wed Sep 10 2003 - 14:21:41 EDT)
• Joe Maimon
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:43:17 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:57:35 EDT)
• Joe Provo
  • Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 20:31:27 EDT)
• Joe St Sauver
  • Re: New CA Law (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 21:46:06 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:04:23 EDT)
• Joel Jaeggli
  • Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 07:55:49 EDT)
  • Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 18:42:32 EDT)
  • RE: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:28:51 EDT)
  • Re: Distributed sniffer products (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:21:45 EDT)
  • Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 15:53:50 EDT)
  • Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now? (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 14:56:27 EDT)
• Joel Perez
  • RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 13:50:14 EDT)
  • RE: Foundry BigIron series (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:12:22 EDT)
  • RE: Address for making BGP changes w/ Qwest? (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:28:45 EDT)
• Joel Rowbottom
  • Re: BMITU (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 11:53:19 EDT)
• Johannes Ullrich
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 19:51:52 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:56:10 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:27:04 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:16:09 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:57:16 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:25:44 EDT)
  • RE: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:12:08 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:11:04 EDT)
  • Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:33:20 EDT)
• John Brown
  • Re: comments on addressing futures.... (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 19:30:26 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN asks VeriSign to pull redirect service (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 23:20:32 EDT)
  • Bind 8 and delegation only ? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 21:49:31 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:58:04 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 02:13:24 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:41:01 EDT)
  • simple way to fix Verisign DNS issues (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:05:04 EDT)
  • Re: Patching BIND (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 01:41:28 EDT)
• John Dvorak
  • Re: ICANN asks VeriSign to pull redirect service (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 18:19:45 EDT)
• John Ferriby
  • RE: Verisign's legal woes??? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:08:45 EDT)
  • RE: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:20:21 EDT)
• John Kinsella
  • Re: InterNAP (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 14:22:10 EDT)
• John Kristoff
  • Re: ICMP Blocking Woes (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 20:36:23 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 21:51:05 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 15:30:23 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:55:18 EDT)
• John Lord
  • RE: Cidera Service Shutting Down (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 11:00:54 EDT)
• John Neiberger
  • RE: Worst design decisions? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 16:16:32 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:29:05 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:29:05 EDT)
  • Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:59:27 EDT)
  • News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:07:21 EDT)
  • Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:27:23 EDT)
  • Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:17:53 EDT)
• John Obi
  • Riverhead or Lancope? (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 04:13:38 EDT)
• John Palmer
  • Rack space in Chicago. (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:41:57 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:26:03 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:43:06 EDT)
  • Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:07:07 EDT)
  • Re: What *are* they smoking? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:41:39 EDT)
  • Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 11:42:02 EDT)
• John Palmer (NANOG Acct)
  • Re: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 16:45:57 EDT)
• John Payne
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 20:02:10 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 19:41:28 EDT)
  • Re: 157.112.0.0/16 ARIN info updated, AT&T still announcing /16 (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 12:32:58 EDT)
  • wire rate filtering and policy routing (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 13:20:24 EDT)
• John R. Levine
  • Re: Korean network problems, was FW: e-bay (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 18:23:53 EDT)
• John Souvestre
  • RE: 92 Byte ICMP Blocking Problem (Sat Sep 13 2003 - 23:53:14 EDT)
• Johnny Eriksson
  • RE: What *are* they smoking? (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:27:22 EDT)
• Joiner, Joshua
  • Contact from Verio (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:05:15 EDT)
• Jonathan Crockett
  • Re: Automatic shutdown of infected network connections (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 10:59:51 EDT)
• Jonathan Hunter
  • Re: Windows updates and dial up users (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 06:13:00 EDT)
• Joshua Sahala
  • Re: [Re: Don't like it, order the ISPs to block it] (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 14:32:22 EDT)
  • Re: [Re: Change to .com/.net behavior] (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:50:42 EDT)
• just me
  • Re: Inevitable Consequences--Verisign (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:23:36 EDT)
  • Re: anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening) (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 19:04:18 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 13:41:41 EDT)
  • Re: .ORG problems this evening (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:30:38 EDT)
  • Re: [Re: Change to .com/.net behavior] (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 09:23:18 EDT)
• Justin Shore
  • Re: williams spamhaus blacklist (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 19:59:30 EDT)
  • Re: what to do about joe-jobs? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 16:30:53 EDT)
  • Re: what to do about joe-jobs? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:07:23 EDT)
  • RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:28:19 EDT)
  • RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:18:35 EDT)
  • Re: what to do about joe-jobs? (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:14:08 EDT)
  • RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:07:37 EDT)
  • Another DNS blacklist is taken down (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 12:28:39 EDT)
  • Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 19:49:29 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:07:24 EDT)
  • Re: Operations notification manager software (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 16:58:29 EDT)
  • Re: Operations notification manager software (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 01:23:35 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 13:55:00 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 21:53:17 EDT)
  • Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 21:32:55 EDT)
  • RE: Providers removing blocks on port 135? (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:30:42 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:21:47 EDT)
  • Re: Worst design decisions? (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:19:20 EDT)
  • Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 19:49:17 EDT)
  • RE: Sabotage not backhoes: More cable cuts (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:13:01 EDT)
  • Re: Sabotage not backho