Nanog 0309
By messages with attachments

Most recent messages
1582 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]
About this archive
Other mail archives

Starting: Mon Sep 01 2003 - 01:38:24 EDT
Ending: Tue Sep 30 2003 - 22:15:35 EDT

RE: IPv6 vs IPv4 (Re: Sprint NOC? Are you awake now?) Jeroen Massar (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:59:35 EDT)
1. part (3316 bytes)
Re: What do you want your ISP to block today? (no name) (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 21:47:39 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Cisco Service Provider code - Any good? Jason Frisvold (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 13:48:14 EDT)
1. signature.asc (190 bytes)
Re: On the back of other 'security' posts.... Scott Francis (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 17:07:43 EDT)
1. part (188 bytes)
CalPOP contact? HTTP CONNECT scanning Jeroen Massar (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 20:17:52 EDT)
1. part (2926 bytes)
Atlanta Internet exchange Michael Lucking (Thu Sep 04 2003 - 12:10:14 EDT)
1. part (621 bytes)
Important changes to the .org tld today. Rodney Joffe (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 09:03:15 EDT)
1. part (2311 bytes)
RE: Important changes to the .org tld today. Jeroen Massar (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 11:37:35 EDT)
1. part (1193 bytes)
Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. Rodney Joffe (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 12:30:01 EDT)
1. part (1366 bytes)
FW: Important changes to the .org tld today. Bruce Beckwith (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 12:43:07 EDT)
1. part (3169 bytes)
Re: Important changes to the .org tld today. Doug Barton (Fri Sep 05 2003 - 19:45:39 EDT)
1. part (1338 bytes)
RE: Re: CalPOP contact? HTTP CONNECT scanning] Jeroen Massar (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 06:40:17 EDT)
1. part (6253 bytes)
RE: Important changes to the .org tld today. Jeroen Massar (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 07:11:56 EDT)
1. part (1612 bytes)
RE: Re: CalPOP contact? HTTP CONNECT scanning] Jeroen Massar (Sat Sep 06 2003 - 13:14:39 EDT)
1. part (6596 bytes)
Re: BMITU (no name) (Sun Sep 07 2003 - 01:46:40 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: Microsoft distributes free CDs in Japan to patch Windows (no name) (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 12:10:07 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
RE: dns.exe virus? Ken Budd (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:35:08 EDT)
1. part (1179 bytes)
Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking? Jason Frisvold (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 16:39:39 EDT)
1. signature.asc (190 bytes)
Re: cef/process switching problem Jason Frisvold (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 11:24:14 EDT)
1. signature.asc (190 bytes)
Re[2]: Alert to Phone/Pager System Allan Liska (Thu Sep 11 2003 - 18:42:38 EDT)
1. part (971 bytes)
Re: Microsoft announces new ways to bypass security controls Mans Nilsson (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 03:22:02 EDT)
1. part (188 bytes)
RE: What *are* they smoking? Jeroen Massar (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:18:26 EDT)
1. part (1810 bytes)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Matthew S. Hallacy (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:45:08 EDT)
1. part (190 bytes)
RE: What *are* they smoking? Jeroen Massar (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:13:48 EDT)
1. part (2285 bytes)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior David B Harris (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:17:16 EDT)
1. part (190 bytes)
Re: What *are* they smoking? David B Harris (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:17:15 EDT)
1. part (190 bytes)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Wayne E. Bouchard (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:30:44 EDT)
1. part (249 bytes)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior David B Harris (Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:18:19 EDT)
1. part (190 bytes)
Re: What *are* they smoking? (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:46:31 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: What *are* they smoking? Mans Nilsson (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 03:27:38 EDT)
1. part (188 bytes)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior David B Harris (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 04:08:08 EDT)
1. part (190 bytes)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:57:54 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:00:45 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 14:17:45 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: Verisign brain damage and DNSSec.....Was:Re: What *are* they smoking? (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:06:44 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: new openssh issue (no name) (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 15:50:04 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) David B Harris (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 16:05:52 EDT)
1. part (190 bytes)
FW: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Mike Damm (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:16:38 EDT)
1. ATT23734.TXT (308 bytes)
Re: Not the best solution, but it takes VeriSign out of the loop (no name) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:44:13 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch (no name) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:46:31 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: Verisign insanity - Distributed non-attack Måns Nilsson (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 03:31:23 EDT)
1. part (188 bytes)
Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch Simon Waters (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 07:53:58 EDT)
1. part (1704 bytes)
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior (no name) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:46:39 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign Matthew Richardson (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 17:04:06 EDT)
1. part (6326 bytes)
Re: Worst design decisions? (no name) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:29:33 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (no name) (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 21:32:10 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: Verisign suggestion David B Harris (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 00:36:05 EDT)
1. part (190 bytes)
Re: Verisign suggestion (no name) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 01:16:14 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: Verisign suggestion Leo Bicknell (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 08:15:36 EDT)
1. part (188 bytes)
Re: DNS anycast considered harmful (was: .ORG problems this evening) Leo Bicknell (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:05:58 EDT)
1. part (188 bytes)
Sven-Haegar Koch: Re: Root Server Operators (Re: What *are* they smoking?) Paul Vixie (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:23:49 EDT)
1. 5675 (2117 bytes)
Re: .ORG problems this evening Leo Bicknell (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:19:49 EDT)
1. part (188 bytes)
Re: Verisign suggestion David B Harris (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:42:26 EDT)
1. part (190 bytes)
Re: Worst design decisions? (Cisco 4x00 rails) Mark Rogaski (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:14:24 EDT)
1. part (190 bytes)
Re: ICANN - Formal Complaint re Verisign (no name) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:34:12 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: "Class A Data Center" (no name) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:45:03 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: Worst design decisions? (no name) (Thu Sep 18 2003 - 21:17:28 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: Worst design decisions? Leo Bicknell (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 13:39:13 EDT)
1. part (188 bytes)
Re: Worst design decisions? (no name) (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:19:15 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: Wildcards: ICANN and IAB posted their commentaries Doug Barton (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 01:05:01 EDT)
1. part (1004 bytes)
Re: Providers removing blocks on port 135? David B Harris (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 18:51:50 EDT)
1. part (190 bytes)
Re: Bye Snubby, hello Mail Rejector David B Harris (Sat Sep 20 2003 - 19:10:06 EDT)
1. part (190 bytes)
RE: When is Verisign's registry contract up for renewal Jeroen Massar (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 16:00:56 EDT)
1. part (1331 bytes)
Re: Windows updates and dial up users (no name) (Sun Sep 21 2003 - 22:04:54 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: Windows updates and dial up users (no name) (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 11:00:51 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Verisign Responds Leo Bicknell (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 21:23:07 EDT)
1. part (188 bytes)
ICANN Secsac message to the board Doug Barton (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 21:55:26 EDT)
1. part (769 bytes)
RE: Verisign Responds Jeroen Massar (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 11:03:30 EDT)
1. part (2189 bytes)
Re: Verisign Responds Matthew Richardson (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 15:21:08 EDT)
1. part (1643 bytes)
Re: monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (no name) (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:32:01 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
New CA Law Leo Bicknell (Tue Sep 23 2003 - 21:27:55 EDT)
1. part (188 bytes)
Re: Verisign Responds Måns Nilsson (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 05:43:26 EDT)
1. part (188 bytes)
Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Leo Bicknell (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 12:44:16 EDT)
1. part (188 bytes)
Re: what to do about joe-jobs? (no name) (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:19:45 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Re: "Class A Data Center" Scott Francis (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 14:20:25 EDT)
1. part (188 bytes)
Re: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Leo Bicknell (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:16:14 EDT)
1. part (188 bytes)
Re: "Class A Data Center" Scott Francis (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 15:47:15 EDT)
1. part (188 bytes)
Re: Verisign Responds Wayne E. Bouchard (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 16:11:48 EDT)
1. part (249 bytes)
RE: Another DNS blacklist is taken down Christopher Bird (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 16:23:22 EDT)
1. Christopher_Bird___.vcf (458 bytes)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Leo Bicknell (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 18:29:33 EDT)
1. part (188 bytes)
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist Leo Bicknell (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 20:01:48 EDT)
1. part (188 bytes)
Re: 419 with a twist (no name) (Wed Sep 24 2003 - 23:52:46 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)
Proposed changes to the AUP. Leo Bicknell (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 10:12:51 EDT)
1. jrace (2616 bytes)
2. first (3011 bytes)
3. second (2838 bytes)
4. third (1952 bytes)
5. part (188 bytes)
Re: Proposed changes to the AUP. Leo Bicknell (Thu Sep 25 2003 - 17:15:14 EDT)
1. part (188 bytes)
RE: New Team Cymru IP2ASN whois server Jeroen Massar (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 05:53:48 EDT)
1. part (1519 bytes)
Re: Average case performance vs. Worst-case guarantee Mark Rogaski (Fri Sep 26 2003 - 19:35:09 EDT)
1. part (190 bytes)
RE: Yet another address harvesting analysis idea Jeroen Massar (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 05:34:03 EDT)
1. part (2211 bytes)
Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...) (no name) (Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:04:36 EDT)
1. part (227 bytes)

Last message date: Tue Sep 30 2003 - 22:15:35 EDT
Archived on: Thu Dec 09 2004 - 16:08:21 EST

1582 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]
About this archive
Other mail archives

Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs

Nanog 0309By messages with attachments

Nanog 0309
By messages with attachments