Nanog 0303
By Date

Most recent messages
980 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
About this archive
Other mail archives

Starting: Sat Mar 01 2003 - 00:08:34 EST
Ending: Mon Mar 31 2003 - 23:59:04 EST

• Re: BGP to doom us all Avi Freedman (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 00:02:14 EST)
• Re: anti-spam vs network abuse (no name) (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 00:15:52 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all Paul Vixie (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 00:29:20 EST)
• Re: anti-spam vs network abuse (no name) (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 01:07:53 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all Vadim Antonov (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 01:49:02 EST)
• RE: BGP to doom us all Paul Ferguson (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 03:48:56 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all (no name) (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 04:57:25 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all Neil J. McRae (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 04:50:47 EST)
• Alcatel Router experience, information Wayne Bogan (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 08:28:20 EST)
• Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Mark Radabaugh (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 10:20:43 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Neil J. McRae (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 10:02:37 EST)
• Re: anti-spam vs network abuse (no name) (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 10:45:07 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Danny McPherson (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 10:48:07 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Stephen J. Wilcox (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:01:12 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Danny McPherson (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:19:11 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Mark Radabaugh (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:31:30 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Stephen J. Wilcox (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:48:35 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Danny McPherson (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:52:01 EST)
• Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Paul Vixie (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:58:22 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Mark Radabaugh (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 12:21:39 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (no name) (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 13:02:13 EST)
• Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Hank Nussbacher (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 13:07:05 EST)
• Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Michael Lamoureux (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 13:41:53 EST)
• DNS records for routers Pete Kruckenberg (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 14:04:36 EST)
• Re: anti-spam vs network abuse (no name) (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 14:07:18 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (no name) (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 14:28:49 EST)
• Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Charlie Clemmer (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 14:32:38 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Richard A Steenbergen (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 14:37:37 EST)
• Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Charlie Clemmer (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 14:43:56 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Jeffrey Meltzer (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 14:50:30 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 15:09:14 EST)
• Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Andy Dills (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 15:13:15 EST)
• RE: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Michael Hallgren (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 16:33:40 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all Avi Freedman (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 17:25:20 EST)
• Re: DNS records for routers Petri Helenius (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 18:21:35 EST)
• Re: Root server error Nathan J. Mehl (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 19:46:43 EST)
• Re: Root server error Geo. (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 20:15:56 EST)
• Re: Root server error E.B. Dreger (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 22:20:49 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Jared Mauch (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 23:53:46 EST)
• Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Michael Lamoureux (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 00:28:49 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all Sean Donelan (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 00:51:24 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all Andy Dills (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 02:22:39 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all Avi Freedman (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 06:12:49 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 06:33:47 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all Christopher L. Morrow (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 13:42:34 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Joe Abley (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 15:15:59 EST)
• Have address space? You too can make policy. Leo Bicknell (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 15:21:31 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (no name) (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 17:06:09 EST)
• Re: Have address space? You too can make policy. William Allen Simpson (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 16:03:42 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Joe Abley (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 21:08:39 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] David Barak (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 22:54:26 EST)
• RE: DNS records for routers Cutler, James R (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 06:16:59 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all (no name) (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 06:53:51 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 07:17:31 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all Jack Bates (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 07:53:56 EST)
• RE: BGP to doom us all St. Clair, James (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 09:00:55 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all (no name) (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 09:51:01 EST)
• RE: BGP to doom us all Kuhtz, Christian (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 09:52:46 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (no name) (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:04:10 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all (no name) (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:06:20 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] David Barak (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:19:58 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all (no name) (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:23:34 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Sean Donelan (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:35:44 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all (no name) (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:38:17 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all Jack Bates (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:45:37 EST)
• Tools (no name) (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:44:34 EST)
• Re: Tools Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 11:02:58 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all (no name) (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 11:15:45 EST)
• Re: Tools Andrew Newton (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 11:32:56 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all David Conrad (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 11:29:42 EST)
• Re: Tools (no name) (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 11:30:49 EST)
• look for contact @Nordnet France Pascal Gloor (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 11:30:10 EST)
• Re: Tools Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 11:46:02 EST)
• RE: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Jim Deleskie (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 11:48:39 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Danny McPherson (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 11:59:11 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all (no name) (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:06:45 EST)
• OT: Need the name of a good Qwest account rep. joe mcguckin (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:29:37 EST)
• Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Richard Irving (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:30:04 EST)
• Re: Tools (no name) (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:41:12 EST)
• Re: Tools Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 13:05:13 EST)
• Fw: ISS Security Brief: Remote Sendmail Header Processing Vulnerability Matt Fearnow (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 13:35:32 EST)
• RE: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Jim Deleskie (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 14:01:58 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all E.B. Dreger (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 14:02:50 EST)
• spamcop.net? blitz (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 21:41:21 EST)
• Re: spamcop.net? Will Yardley (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 21:50:31 EST)
• Re: spamcop.net? Christopher L. Morrow (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 21:51:45 EST)
• Re: spamcop.net? Martin Hannigan (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 23:43:56 EST)
• Re: spamcop.net? Christopher L. Morrow (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 00:01:00 EST)
• RE: spamcop.net? blitz (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 03:17:52 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all (no name) (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 04:26:02 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all Rafi Sadowsky (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 05:03:29 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all (no name) (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 07:04:10 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all Iljitsch van Beijnum (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 07:06:04 EST)
• Why replicate the DNS? (no name) (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 07:44:56 EST)
• Re: BGP to doom us all Daniel Karrenberg (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 10:08:43 EST)
• Re: spamcop.net? Stephen Sprunk (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 14:14:16 EST)
• Re: spamcop.net? blitz (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 14:52:06 EST)
• Re: spamcop.net? chuck goolsbee (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 14:53:39 EST)
• nntp peering question Scott Granados (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 16:12:02 EST)
• Re: spamcop.net? Peter Salus (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 16:54:41 EST)
• Re: spamcop.net? Paul Vixie (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 19:33:55 EST)
• Using HINFO (was Re: spamcop.net?) Sean Donelan (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 04:13:46 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] leo vegoda (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 11:43:06 EST)
• OT: level3 contact Steve Rude (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 13:45:45 EST)
• RE: level3 contact Temkin, David (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 14:12:28 EST)
• Re: OT: level3 contact Andy Dills (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 16:03:55 EST)
• RE: OT: level3 contact Kris Foster (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 16:04:41 EST)
• RE: OT: level3 contact Andy Dills (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 16:40:49 EST)
• RE: OT: level3 contact Daniel Golding (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:01:22 EST)
• Re: OT: level3 contact joe mcguckin (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:12:32 EST)
• RE: OT: level3 contact Steve Rude (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:13:27 EST)
• IPv4 Addresses update John L Crain (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:56:01 EST)
• Re: OT: level3 contact Richard A Steenbergen (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 18:52:11 EST)
• Re: Why replicate the DNS? Joe Abley (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 21:58:20 EST)
• Re: Why replicate the DNS? (no name) (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 04:27:28 EST)
• Re: Why replicate the DNS? Eric A. Hall (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 09:06:12 EST)
• ISP recommendation for Mumbai (no name) (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 09:14:50 EST)
• Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment) Dr. Jeffrey Race (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 10:55:25 EST)
• Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment) Andy Dills (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 12:30:11 EST)
• Re: Root server error Matt Larson (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 13:15:12 EST)
• Re: [Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment)] Joshua Smith (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 13:17:35 EST)
• 60 Hudson Jeffrey Meltzer (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 15:23:19 EST)
• Tech contact for IXEurope/ixsolutions? Danny (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 22:32:51 EST)
• Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment) Dr. Jeffrey Race (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 02:32:38 EST)
• Re: [Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment)] Dr. Jeffrey Race (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 02:41:44 EST)
• The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 06:00:02 EST)
• Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment) Peter Galbavy (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 09:05:31 EST)
• Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment) Dr. Jeffrey Race (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 10:28:20 EST)
• Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment) Peter Galbavy (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 10:35:22 EST)
• Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment) Andy Dills (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 13:25:55 EST)
• 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Eric Germann (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 14:57:22 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Dave Israel (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:13:16 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Stretch (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:22:42 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Richard A Steenbergen (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:33:20 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Stephen J. Wilcox (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:34:29 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Robert E. Seastrom (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:43:28 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Richard A Steenbergen (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:53:22 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Dave Israel (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:55:41 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Adam Kujawski (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:09:25 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Mikael Abrahamsson (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:09:51 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Richard A Steenbergen (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:20:17 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Scott Weeks (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:20:56 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Peter Salus (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:27:50 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... David G. Andersen (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:37:51 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:44:14 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:44:30 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Marshall Eubanks (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:49:54 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Andy Dills (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:52:13 EST)
• UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement Sean Donelan (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:52:35 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... fingers (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:56:29 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Marshall Eubanks (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:58:29 EST)
• Re: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement Dan Hollis (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 17:01:42 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Matt Zimmerman (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 17:06:07 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Stephen J. Wilcox (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 17:07:12 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Sean M.Doran (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 17:13:15 EST)
• Re: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement- COPA Enforcement BAN Richard Irving (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 17:17:04 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Miles Fidelman (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 17:18:41 EST)
• RE: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement Mark Borchers (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 19:04:07 EST)
• 69/8...this sucks (no name) (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 19:33:47 EST)
• RE: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement Dan Hollis (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 19:56:02 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks (no name) (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 18:42:13 EST)
• Re: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement Steven M. Bellovin (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 20:47:41 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Jack Bates (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 23:15:31 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Majdi S. Abbas (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 00:30:53 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Andrew Dorsett (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 00:51:51 EST)
• RE: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practic e (please comment) (no name) (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 01:07:45 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... E.B. Dreger (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 01:17:55 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Richard A Steenbergen (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 01:25:17 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... E.B. Dreger (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 01:36:04 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Peter Galbavy (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 04:29:04 EST)
• Re: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement Neil J. McRae (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 04:42:32 EST)
• Clueful Engineer at C&W Needed - OC-3 Problem Gordon Ewasiuk (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 08:55:45 EST)
• Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] David Lesher (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 09:40:17 EST)
• Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] Randy Bush (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 09:59:30 EST)
• Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] David Lesher (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 10:11:32 EST)
• Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] Lucy E. Lynch (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:31:16 EST)
• Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] David Lesher (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:33:54 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Jason Slagle (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:55:48 EST)
• Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] Stephen Sprunk (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 12:47:06 EST)
• Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] David Lesher (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:00:25 EST)
• Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Cottrell, Les (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:04:20 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Hank Nussbacher (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:15:30 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Hank Nussbacher (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:20:10 EST)
• Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean E.B. Dreger (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:25:26 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Hank Nussbacher (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:34:24 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Stephen Sprunk (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:55:14 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (no name) (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:23:29 EST)
• Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (no name) (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:29:56 EST)
• Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean David G. Andersen (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:43:00 EST)
• RE: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Cottrell, Les (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:43:58 EST)
• Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] Sean Donelan (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:46:18 EST)
• Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (no name) (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:58:45 EST)
• RE: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Cottrell, Les (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:13:53 EST)
• RE: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (no name) (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:24:21 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Marshall Eubanks (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:26:38 EST)
• RE: 923Mbits/s across the ocean E.B. Dreger (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:36:18 EST)
• Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:49:01 EST)
• RE: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Cottrell, Les (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 17:00:17 EST)
• Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Joe St Sauver (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 18:14:49 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Jessica Yu (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 18:49:16 EST)
• RE: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Cottrell, Les (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 18:52:08 EST)
• Port 80 Issues John Murphy (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:13:10 EST)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (no email) (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:29:10 EST)
• Re: Port 80 Issues John Murphy (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 00:01:29 EST)
• Re: Port 80 Issues Richard A Steenbergen (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 01:26:55 EST)
• Re: Port 80 Issues John Murphy (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 01:49:46 EST)
• Re: Port 80 Issues Sean Donelan (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 02:20:03 EST)
• Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 08:25:25 EST)
• RE: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Cottrell, Les (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 11:29:16 EST)
• RE: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Antony Antony (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 11:35:24 EST)
• Question concerning authoritative bodies. Jack Bates (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 12:50:04 EST)
• Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Johannes Ullrich (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 12:53:48 EST)
• Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean David G. Andersen (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 12:59:55 EST)
• RE: Question concerning authoritative bodies. McBurnett, Jim (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 13:19:06 EST)
• Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (no name) (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 13:31:41 EST)
• Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Richard A Steenbergen (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 13:52:54 EST)
• Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Jack Bates (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:09:14 EST)
• Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (no name) (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:35:11 EST)
• Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Jack Bates (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:51:52 EST)
• Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (no name) (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:59:05 EST)
• Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) james (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:03:33 EST)
• Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (no name) (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:55:47 EST)
• Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Jonathan Claybaugh (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:11:52 EST)
• Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Johannes Ullrich (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:41:07 EST)
• Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. E.B. Dreger (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:45:19 EST)
• Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) james (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:51:24 EST)
• Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Sean Donelan (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:58:02 EST)
• Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. J.A. Terranson (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:06:11 EST)
• Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Jack Bates (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:10:07 EST)
• Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) james (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:15:26 EST)
• Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (no name) (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 19:13:36 EST)
• Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (no name) (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 19:28:39 EST)
• Re: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement Peter Galbavy (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 04:15:11 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks (no name) (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 04:46:33 EST)
• Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] (no name) (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 05:00:01 EST)
• Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Vadim Antonov (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 05:26:35 EST)
• Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] Bradley Dunn (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 05:43:15 EST)
• Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Douglas F. Calvert (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 08:10:12 EST)
• Re: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement Roland Perry (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 09:09:52 EST)
• RE: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practic e (please comment) Cutler, James R (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 09:11:31 EST)
• RE: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Pete Templin (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 09:53:37 EST)
• Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Marshall Eubanks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:10:24 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:16:35 EST)
• Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] E.B. Dreger (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:18:52 EST)
• RE: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practic e (please comment) Dr. Jeffrey Race (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:17:56 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Mark Segal (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:27:35 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. E.B. Dreger (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:45:43 EST)
• RE: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practic e (please comment) E.B. Dreger (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:52:50 EST)
• RE: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practic e (please comment) David Barak (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:52:46 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Haesu (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:54:54 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Mark Segal (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:54:36 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Mark Segal (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:57:07 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Haesu (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 11:18:29 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Joe Abley (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:30:32 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Christopher L. Morrow (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:30:27 EST)
• Re: [Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering..] Joshua Smith (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:40:57 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. E.B. Dreger (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:44:11 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Christopher L. Morrow (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:50:29 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (no name) (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:52:06 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (no name) (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:54:50 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (no name) (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:02:42 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Rob Thomas (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:03:23 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:05:28 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (no name) (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:07:55 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Joe Boyce (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:56:55 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Jack Bates (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:02:10 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Barry Raveendran Greene (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:17:55 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. McBurnett, Jim (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:31:25 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Jack Bates (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:39:26 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Jeff S Wheeler (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:23:52 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. McBurnett, Jim (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:26:40 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Michael Whisenant (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:26:28 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. E.B. Dreger (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:28:23 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:35:51 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks (no name) (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:38:15 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:49:04 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:52:13 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Jared Mauch (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:55:47 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (no name) (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:56:10 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks McBurnett, Jim (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:57:34 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Doug Barton (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:00:15 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks McBurnett, Jim (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:00:01 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks (no name) (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:15:36 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:20:13 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Kevin Loch (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:22:16 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Russell Heilling (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:38:48 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Doug Barton (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:58:20 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Todd A. Blank (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:02:16 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Daniel Roesen (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:10:35 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:18:33 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Simon Lyall (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:28:55 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. E.B. Dreger (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:30:20 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Jack Bates (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:42:40 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks Frank Scalzo (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:41:56 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. James-lists (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:48:02 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (no name) (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:51:17 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:07:25 EST)
• 202/7 (RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering..) E.B. Dreger (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:10:55 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks Rob Thomas (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:20:11 EST)
• scope of the 69/8 problem E.B. Dreger (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:22:54 EST)
• Fwd: Re. Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Jonathan Claybaugh (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:30:43 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Ray Bellis (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:39:19 EST)
• Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:41:15 EST)
• RE: scope of the 69/8 problem Cutler, James R (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:58:29 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Charles Sprickman (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 19:16:29 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Jack Bates (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 19:17:28 EST)
• RE: scope of the 69/8 problem E.B. Dreger (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 19:26:28 EST)
• Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Richard A Steenbergen (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 19:35:36 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Brandon Butterworth (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 19:40:10 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Joel Jaeggli (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 19:45:58 EST)
• Move all 9-1-1 to 8-5-5 Sean Donelan (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 19:51:00 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Owen DeLong (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 20:16:16 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks Frank Scalzo (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 21:25:39 EST)
• Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? chuck goolsbee (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 22:14:07 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks (no name) (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 22:18:51 EST)
• Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Christopher L. Morrow (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 22:28:07 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Jack Bates (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 22:27:56 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks Haesu (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 22:44:43 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Chris Adams (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 22:56:01 EST)
• Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? chuck goolsbee (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 23:03:14 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. McBurnett, Jim (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 23:19:38 EST)
• RE: Move all 9-1-1 to 8-5-5 Vivien M. (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 00:09:45 EST)
• Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Dr. Jeffrey Race (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 02:01:51 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Dr. Jeffrey Race (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 02:13:39 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Hank Nussbacher (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:30:15 EST)
• Bogon and anti-spoof filters Simon Brilus (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 04:48:41 EST)
• Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters Neil J. McRae (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 04:57:51 EST)
• Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Iljitsch van Beijnum (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 05:32:56 EST)
• 69/8 compelling content? Simon Waters (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 05:32:30 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Stephen J. Wilcox (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 05:51:57 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Stephen J. Wilcox (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 05:56:36 EST)
• Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters Simon Brilus (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 06:00:50 EST)
• Re: Move all 9-1-1 to 8-5-5 (no name) (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 06:11:04 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks (no name) (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 06:18:37 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Iljitsch van Beijnum (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 07:24:54 EST)
• Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? (no name) (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 07:48:44 EST)
• Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? E.B. Dreger (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 08:15:53 EST)
• RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? McBurnett, Jim (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 08:43:18 EST)
• RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? (no name) (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 08:50:09 EST)
• Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Stephen J. Wilcox (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 08:50:01 EST)
• RE: Move all 9-1-1 to 8-5-5 Mark Segal (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:03:47 EST)
• Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Peter Galbavy (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:05:47 EST)
• Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters Jack Bates (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:28:28 EST)
• RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? chuck goolsbee (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:34:45 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Jack Bates (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:34:10 EST)
• RE: Move all 9-1-1 to 8-5-5 (no name) (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:40:37 EST)
• RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Callis, Adam (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:37:15 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Michael Whisenant (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 10:05:37 EST)
• RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? McBurnett, Jim (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 10:44:24 EST)
• Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Ron da Silva (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 10:41:36 EST)
• Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (no name) (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 11:07:18 EST)
• RE: Move all 9-1-1 to 8-5-5 McBurnett, Jim (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 11:20:02 EST)
• Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Andy Walden (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 12:31:30 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Owen DeLong (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 11:48:07 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Iljitsch van Beijnum (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 12:05:34 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Owen DeLong (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 12:21:56 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Owen DeLong (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 12:25:38 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Peter Galbavy (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 12:28:41 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks Ejay Hire (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 12:33:57 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks Andy Dills (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 12:50:35 EST)
• OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? (no name) (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 12:55:38 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks Owen DeLong (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 12:58:21 EST)
• Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? Andrew Dorsett (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:05:05 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Joe Boyce (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:06:54 EST)
• RE: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? Mike Damm (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:11:43 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks Andy Dills (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:11:23 EST)
• Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? Bradley Dunn (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:17:41 EST)
• Re: scope of the 69/8 problem Stephen Sprunk (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:03:14 EST)
• Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Stephen Sprunk (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:18:35 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Stephen Sprunk (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:28:02 EST)
• Re: scope of the 69/8 problem (no name) (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:51:22 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Iljitsch van Beijnum (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:04:47 EST)
• 69/8 problem -- Would CNN care? Lee Watterworth (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:06:49 EST)
• Re: 69/8 problem -- Would CNN care? Jared Mauch (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:26:23 EST)
• (no subject) Stephen Gill (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:32:42 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Owen DeLong (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:38:23 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks Owen DeLong (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:40:58 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks Rob Thomas (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:46:32 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks Scott Granados (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:47:16 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (no name) (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:49:35 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Larry J. Blunk (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 15:01:01 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks Rick Duff (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 15:08:54 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Larry J. Blunk (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:00:33 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Richard A Steenbergen (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:07:32 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks Andy Dills (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:10:46 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Randy Bush (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:47:29 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Alec H. Peterson (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:58:10 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks Iljitsch van Beijnum (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 17:42:22 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Charles Sprickman (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 18:22:14 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks (no name) (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:37:29 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Andy Dills (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:30:11 EST)
• Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) JC Dill (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:44:11 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Andy Dills (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:44:06 EST)
• RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) McBurnett, Jim (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:59:51 EST)
• Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Richard A Steenbergen (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:17:19 EST)
• Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) wireworks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:46:30 EST)
• RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Todd A. Blank (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:32:34 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Jack Bates (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:39:50 EST)
• Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) JC Dill (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:01:00 EST)
• Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Richard A Steenbergen (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:21:39 EST)
• Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Adam Rothschild (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:42:02 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Jack Bates (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:42:47 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks (no name) (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:52:07 EST)
• Increase in packet loss from the west coast Sean Donelan (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 23:00:18 EST)
• Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? (no name) (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 04:36:25 EST)
• Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 05:11:16 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks David Luyer (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 06:03:12 EST)
• Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? K. Graham (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 07:02:29 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks Stephen J. Wilcox (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 07:14:12 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks David Luyer (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 07:41:45 EST)
• Route Supression Problem Jack Bates (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 07:53:03 EST)
• Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 08:42:49 EST)
• Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? Andrew Dorsett (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 08:53:45 EST)
• Re: Route Supression Problem (no name) (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 09:01:23 EST)
• Re: Route Supression Problem John Kristoff (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 09:05:17 EST)
• RE: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? Huopio Kauto (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 09:08:11 EST)
• Re: Route Supression Problem Randy Bush (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 09:29:36 EST)
• Re: Route Supression Problem Randy Bush (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 09:33:11 EST)
• Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? Petri Helenius (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 09:39:03 EST)
• Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Ron da Silva (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 09:50:34 EST)
• Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (no name) (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:03:00 EST)
• Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:06:23 EST)
• Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Greg Maxwell (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:21:39 EST)
• Re: Route Supression Problem Peter E. Fry (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 11:33:25 EST)
• RE: 69/8 problem -- Would CNN care? Lee Watterworth (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 11:35:07 EST)
• Re: [Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks)] Joshua Smith (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 11:43:26 EST)
• Re: Route Supression Problem Adam Rothschild (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:03:49 EST)
• 69/8 is harder to fix than it looks at first glance (no name) (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:11:22 EST)
• Re: 69/8 is harder to fix than it looks at first glance Joe Abley (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:24:03 EST)
• Re: 69/8 problem -- Would CNN care? Jack Bates (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:28:23 EST)
• Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Stephen Sprunk (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:44:05 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Stephen Sprunk (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:48:47 EST)
• Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:54:51 EST)
• Re: Route Supression Problem Danny McPherson (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 13:27:06 EST)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks Owen DeLong (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 13:32:09 EST)
• RE: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? Robert M. Enger (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 13:49:15 EST)
• Re: Route Supression Problem Danny McPherson (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 13:53:51 EST)
• Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 14:02:24 EST)
• Re: Route Supression Problem Vadim Antonov (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 14:04:14 EST)
• Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Tim Thorne (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 14:29:54 EST)
• Re: Route Supression Problem Danny McPherson (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 14:49:47 EST)
• cw to att? issue? Scott Granados (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 15:23:43 EST)
• Re: Route Supression Problem Jack Bates (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 16:28:50 EST)
• Re: cw to att? issue? Shon Elliott (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 16:45:44 EST)
• Re: cw to att? issue? Mark Kasten (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:16:12 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks (no name) (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:20:03 EST)
• Re: cw to att? issue? Scott Granados (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:19:58 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks (no name) (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:21:35 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Randy Bush (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:34:45 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Andy Dills (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:44:55 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Peter E. Fry (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 19:48:44 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Andy Dills (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:02:44 EST)
• Getting a Host Record Crist J. Clark (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:25:15 EST)
• Re: Getting a Host Record Will Yardley (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:30:35 EST)
• Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) JC Dill (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:36:55 EST)
• Re: cw to att? issue? Richard A Steenbergen (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:35:24 EST)
• Re: cw to att? issue? Scott Granados (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:56:46 EST)
• Re: Getting a Host Record (no name) (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 18:53:39 EST)
• Re: cw to att? issue? (no name) (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:49:59 EST)
• gender and nanog Randy Bush (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:48:37 EST)
• Re: cw to att? issue? Haesu (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:51:51 EST)
• RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Vivien M. (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:58:50 EST)
• Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Andy Dills (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 21:27:51 EST)
• Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Jack Bates (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 21:29:04 EST)
• RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Vivien M. (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 21:50:55 EST)
• Re: 69/8 problem -- Would CNN care? Jack Bates (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 21:59:27 EST)
• Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) (no name) (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 22:01:25 EST)
• route filtering in large networks Andy Dills (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 22:22:53 EST)
• Gender and other protocol issues Cutler, James R (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 22:44:05 EST)
• Re: route filtering in large networks Richard A Steenbergen (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 22:47:21 EST)
• RE: Gender and other protocol issues Todd A. Blank (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 23:00:22 EST)
• Re: route filtering in large networks Jack Bates (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 23:04:51 EST)
• Re: route filtering in large networks Alan Hannan (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 22:47:09 EST)
• RE: route filtering in large networks Michael K. Smith (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 23:44:36 EST)
• Re: route filtering in large networks Randy Bush (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 23:47:39 EST)
• Re: route filtering in large networks Randy Bush (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 23:51:23 EST)
• Re: route filtering in large networks Jack Bates (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 23:59:18 EST)
• Re: route filtering in large networks Andy Dills (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 00:21:10 EST)
• Re: route filtering in large networks Peter E. Fry (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 01:06:42 EST)
• Re: cw to att? issue? Rob Thomas (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 01:42:18 EST)
• Re: route filtering in large networks Christopher L. Morrow (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 01:50:23 EST)
• Re: route filtering in large networks Rob Thomas (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 01:57:00 EST)
• Re: route filtering in large networks Iljitsch van Beijnum (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 03:06:47 EST)
• att.net domain expired Ejay Hire (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 03:46:12 EST)
• RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this [degenerate linguistic usage elided) Dr. Jeffrey Race (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 03:50:22 EST)
• Re: att.net domain expired Bruce Pinsky (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 03:58:39 EST)
• Re: att.net domain expired (no name) (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 02:11:38 EST)
• RE: att.net domain expired Ejay Hire (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 04:06:20 EST)
• Re: att.net domain expired Richard A Steenbergen (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 04:55:55 EST)
• Re: cw to att? issue? Thomas Kernen (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 06:06:18 EST)
• Ability of Genuity to rate limit on a /24 boundary Josh Brooks (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 06:11:37 EST)
• Re: route filtering in large networks Randy Bush (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 07:13:10 EST)
• Re: att.net domain expired Sean Donelan (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 08:00:26 EST)
• RE: Gender and other protocol issues (no name) (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 08:18:42 EST)
• Re: route filtering in large networks E.B. Dreger (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 11:13:39 EST)
• Amateurs suck (was [snip] (was Re: 69/8...this [degenerate linguistic usage elided)) Etaoin Shrdlu (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 11:33:54 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks Niels Bakker (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 11:42:03 EST)
• Re: Amateurs suck (was [snip] (was Re: 69/8...this [degenerate linguistic usage elided)) Lucy E. Lynch (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:04:51 EST)
• Re: route filtering in large networks Lars Erik Gullerud (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:45:36 EST)
• Re: Getting a Host Record Gregory Hicks (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:53:28 EST)
• Re: route filtering in large networks Dorian Kim (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 14:38:51 EST)
• RE: Open source / GPL Ip address management software. Bowers, Brent (CCI-San Diego) (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 14:55:20 EST)
• Re: route filtering in large networks Stephen Sprunk (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:13:08 EST)
• IETF BOF on Network Configuration (netconf) Sean Donelan (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:20:39 EST)
• Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Owen DeLong (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 17:00:27 EST)
• Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Owen DeLong (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 17:07:18 EST)
• DSL-IP Probes Curiousity.. McBurnett, Jim (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 17:19:02 EST)
• Re: I need help finding SAN-FRANCISCO.CA.US Registrar Paul Vixie (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 19:18:15 EST)
• Re: I need help finding SAN-FRANCISCO.CA.US Registrar Matthew Kaufman (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 19:59:19 EST)
• Re: DSL-IP Probes Curiousity.. Sean Donelan (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 00:30:53 EST)
• Re: DSL-IP Probes Curiousity.. Scott Granados (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 00:56:45 EST)
• Re: DSL-IP Probes Curiousity.. Mike Tancsa (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 00:53:13 EST)
• Re: DSL-IP Probes Curiousity.. batz (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 02:17:02 EST)
• The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 06:00:00 EST)
• RE: DSL-IP Probes Curiousity.. McBurnett, Jim (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 07:52:32 EST)
• Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Shane Kerr (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 11:53:12 EST)
• [Q] Stable Service Provider IOS Version? Matt Martini (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:52:56 EST)
• [Fwd: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their securitysystem] William Allen Simpson (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 21:32:09 EST)
• Re: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their securitysystem] Jack Bates (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 23:27:03 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their Jeff Kell (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 23:36:18 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their securitysystem] John Payne (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 23:43:31 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their (no name) (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 23:48:44 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their Jack Bates (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 23:57:30 EST)
• * * * SECURITY UPDATE * * * MRLG-4.2.4 Released * * * (fwd) John Payne (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 00:01:28 EST)
• Re: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their securitysystem] Jeremy T. Bouse (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 02:43:39 EST)
• Re: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their securitysystem] John R. Levine (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 10:01:47 EST)
• Re: [Q] Stable Service Provider IOS Version? Daniel Concepcion (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 10:04:28 EST)
• Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean William Allen Simpson (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 12:15:10 EST)
• Req contact: "Kindhosts", PA Avleen Vig (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 15:59:48 EST)
• Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? Michael C. Wu (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 20:44:58 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their (no name) (Sun Mar 16 2003 - 18:15:11 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their Jack Bates (Sun Mar 16 2003 - 18:35:25 EST)
• APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA John Tran (Sun Mar 16 2003 - 20:01:27 EST)
• Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Andy Dills (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 01:11:06 EST)
• Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Richard A Steenbergen (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 01:24:52 EST)
• Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Sean Donelan (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 01:30:39 EST)
• Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Jared Mauch (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 01:31:08 EST)
• Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (no name) (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 01:42:12 EST)
• Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Philip Smith (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 02:52:58 EST)
• Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Scott Francis (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 03:28:37 EST)
• OpenSSL Len Rose (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 04:39:31 EST)
• Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Leo Bicknell (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 09:18:04 EST)
• Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (no name) (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 09:42:03 EST)
• Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (no name) (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 10:01:32 EST)
• Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Leo Bicknell (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 10:28:10 EST)
• FW: Controlling outbound traffic in a multihomed BGP environment Daniel Abbey (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 11:20:24 EST)
• RE: Controlling outbound traffic in a multihomed BGP environment Ejay Hire (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 11:39:11 EST)
• Re: OpenSSL Scott Francis (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 12:34:58 EST)
• Re: OpenSSL Steven M. Bellovin (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 12:55:24 EST)
• RE: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Mark Borchers (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 13:51:17 EST)
• Nortel SHASTA Gerard White (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 13:57:56 EST)
• Re: Nortel SHASTA Petri Helenius (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 14:01:07 EST)
• Re: OpenSSL Stewart, William C (Bill), SALES (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 15:52:10 EST)
• New MS and CERT Warning Eric Germann (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 16:45:21 EST)
• RE: Nortel SHASTA Alan Sato (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 17:25:10 EST)
• Re: OpenSSL Scott Francis (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 20:18:23 EST)
• of marginal oper. interest [bgp reflecting actual traffic flow (or not)] k claffy (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 00:30:13 EST)
• Re: OpenSSL (no name) (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 05:23:31 EST)
• Re: OpenSSL Eric Rescorla (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 09:18:42 EST)
• Re: OpenSSL (no name) (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 10:03:41 EST)
• Re: OpenSSL Petri Helenius (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 10:09:58 EST)
• Re: OpenSSL (no name) (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 10:36:48 EST)
• Re: OpenSSL Eric Rescorla (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 10:48:10 EST)
• RE: OpenSSL Matt Ryan (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 10:58:30 EST)
• RE: OpenSSL (no name) (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 11:57:05 EST)
• Co-lo best practices on IP allocations Daniel Abbey (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 11:56:45 EST)
• Code red- Returning? McBurnett, Jim (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 12:50:17 EST)
• Re: OpenSSL Petri Helenius (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 12:52:23 EST)
• RE: Code red- Returning? Eric Germann (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 13:05:37 EST)
• whois.crsnic.net down? (no name) (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 13:20:48 EST)
• RE: Code red- Returning? McBurnett, Jim (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 13:37:45 EST)
• FW: Code red- Returning? McBurnett, Jim (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 13:38:57 EST)
• --NON-Topic-- Advertising on NANOG instead of...... McBurnett, Jim (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 13:55:50 EST)
• Re: whois.crsnic.net down? (no name) (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 13:09:56 EST)
• Re: Co-lo best practices on IP allocations Andy Dills (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 17:20:08 EST)
• RE: Co-lo best practices on IP allocations marc van hoof (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 18:56:20 EST)
• RE: Co-lo best practices on IP allocations Mohammed Al Sukkar (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 23:25:22 EST)
• RE: Code red- Returning? Mohammed Al Sukkar (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 23:35:51 EST)
• RE: Co-lo best practices on IP allocations McBurnett, Jim (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 08:08:06 EST)
• Problems with AT&T German Martinez (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 11:27:01 EST)
• 69/8 revisited Rick Ernst (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 12:42:46 EST)
• RE: OpenSSL Matt Ryan (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 12:54:31 EST)
• Re: Problems with AT&T Charles E. Youse (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 13:09:06 EST)
• Re: 69/8 revisited (no name) (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 13:26:31 EST)
• Re: 69/8 revisited Jared Mauch (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 12:57:44 EST)
• Re: 69/8 revisited Scott Granados (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 13:49:06 EST)
• Re: 69/8 revisited (no name) (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 13:53:13 EST)
• Draft client notice for 69/8 problems Matt Martini (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 13:58:36 EST)
• Re: Problems with AT&T Sean Donelan (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 14:28:16 EST)
• Re: scope of the 69/8 problem (no email) (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 14:39:57 EST)
• Re: Problems with AT&T brett watson (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 14:47:55 EST)
• RE: Problems with AT&T Truman, Michelle, SALES (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 15:39:10 EST)
• Re: 69/8 revisited Stephen Sprunk (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 16:51:11 EST)
• Re: 69/8 revisited (no name) (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 17:01:45 EST)
• Re: Co-lo best practices on IP allocations Steve Gibbard (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 17:20:35 EST)
• NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word Jeff Wasilko (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 18:01:22 EST)
• RE: 69/8 revisited McBurnett, Jim (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 20:25:20 EST)
• Re: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word J.A. Terranson (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 20:40:31 EST)
• RE: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word Deepak Jain (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 20:52:13 EST)
• Re: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word (no name) (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 21:01:08 EST)
• RE: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word (no name) (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 21:02:37 EST)
• Re: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word Joe (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 21:09:29 EST)
• Re: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word Jack Bates (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 22:04:35 EST)
• Re: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word Vadim Antonov (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 23:02:52 EST)
• Re: Your message to "<>" Jack Bates (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 23:08:36 EST)
• Re: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word (no name) (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 23:38:35 EST)
• Initial network impacts post-US attack 3/19/03 Sean Donelan (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 00:03:13 EST)
• Re: Initial network impacts post-US attack 3/19/03 Stretch (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 00:21:41 EST)
• Re: Initial network impacts post-US attack 3/19/03 Richard A Steenbergen (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 00:55:49 EST)
• Re: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word M. David Leonard (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 09:01:05 EST)
• Need Multicast Feed. Ejay Hire (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 10:52:45 EST)
• VU#464113 - TCP/IP implementations handle unusual flag combinations inconsistently Ian Finlay (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 12:45:12 EST)
• Trend and analysis tools David Scott Olverson (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 13:21:26 EST)
• Re: Initial network impacts post-US attack 3/19/03 Sean Donelan (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 13:39:07 EST)
• NY carrier neutral colo: what a maze... Steve Francis (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 14:36:31 EST)
• RE: Initial network impacts post-US attack 3/19/03 Eric Germann (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 14:34:07 EST)
• Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (no email) (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 14:51:45 EST)
• Power outage: San Francisco Multimedia Gulch South of Market Sean Donelan (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 14:58:46 EST)
• Re: Co-lo best practices on IP allocations (no email) (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 15:14:52 EST)
• Re: Problems with AT&T (no email) (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 15:26:35 EST)
• Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Stephen J. Wilcox (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 16:03:10 EST)
• Re: Problems with AT&T Eric Osborne (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 16:29:29 EST)
• June NANOG meeting Susan Harris (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 17:55:09 EST)
• RE: Problems with AT&T (no email) (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 19:13:02 EST)
• RE: Problems with AT&T Truman, Michelle, SALES (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 20:56:57 EST)
• RE: Problems with AT&T Mohammed Al Sukkar (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 21:05:25 EST)
• RE: Problems with AT&T Truman, Michelle, SALES (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 02:01:05 EST)
• RE: Initial network impacts post-US attack 3/19/03 Tomas Daniska (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 02:50:34 EST)
• The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 06:00:01 EST)
• ATM SVCs/Signalling Mark Borchers (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 10:19:59 EST)
• Re: ATM SVCs/Signalling John L Lee (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 11:20:16 EST)
• RE: ATM SVCs/Signalling Mark Borchers (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 11:30:47 EST)
• RE: Problems with AT&T (no email) (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 11:59:11 EST)
• Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (no email) (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 12:11:47 EST)
• RE: Problems with AT&T Truman, Michelle, SALES (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 12:15:53 EST)
• Re: Problems with AT&T (no email) (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 12:27:33 EST)
• Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Dave Israel (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:36:46 EST)
• Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Jason Lixfeld (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:35:54 EST)
• OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Drew Weaver (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:46:51 EST)
• Re: Notebooks /w a serial port? Adam Debus (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:40:39 EST)
• Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Larry Rosenman (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:42:24 EST)
• Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Roy (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:40:17 EST)
• Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Andy Dills (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:47:41 EST)
• Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Keptin Komrade Dr. BobWrench III esq. (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:50:44 EST)
• Re: Notebooks /w a serial port? Kevin Oberman (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:46:01 EST)
• Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Johannes Ullrich (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:48:07 EST)
• (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing Deepak Jain (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:58:44 EST)
• Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Dominic J. Eidson (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 17:01:55 EST)
• RE: Notebooks /w a serial port? Todd Mitchell - lists (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:32:24 EST)
• Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Larry Rosenman (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:31:28 EST)
• RE: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Drew Weaver (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:57:22 EST)
• Re: Notebooks /w a serial port? Petri Helenius (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:39:17 EST)
• OT: need SBCIS (7132) contact with DNS clue E.B. Dreger (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 17:44:15 EST)
• Re: (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing Stephen J. Wilcox (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 17:50:59 EST)
• Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Michael Lucking (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 17:49:55 EST)
• Re: OT: need SBCIS (7132) contact with DNS clue Martin J. Levy (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 18:17:24 EST)
• Re: (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing (no name) (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 18:27:12 EST)
• Re: OT: need SBCIS (7132) contact with DNS clue E.B. Dreger (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 18:30:05 EST)
• Re: OT: need SBCIS (7132) contact with DNS clue just me (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 18:59:53 EST)
• Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Sean Donelan (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:03:27 EST)
• Re: (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing William B. Norton (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 19:09:09 EST)
• Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:24:05 EST)
• Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Stephen J. Wilcox (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:26:17 EST)
• Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Stephen J. Wilcox (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:36:23 EST)
• Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Charles Sprickman (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:36:18 EST)
• Re: (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing Leo Bicknell (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:39:42 EST)
• Re: Notebooks /w a serial port? Steve Gibbard (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:52:11 EST)
• Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Charles Sprickman (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:42:41 EST)
• Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:44:01 EST)
• Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Sean Donelan (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:49:33 EST)
• VLAN between PAIX VA and EQUINIX ASHBURN Rodney Joffe (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:53:12 EST)
• Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Johannes Catterwell (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 20:02:39 EST)
• Re: Notebooks /w a serial port? Grant A. Kirkwood (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 20:03:45 EST)
• Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? joe mcguckin (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 21:26:08 EST)
• Re: Notebooks /w a serial port? David Lesher (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 21:34:52 EST)
• Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Andy Dills (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 21:39:02 EST)
• Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Joel Jaeggli (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 21:51:05 EST)
• Bellsouth clueful? Jason Slagle (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 22:48:01 EST)
• Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Neil J. McRae (Sat Mar 22 2003 - 03:51:17 EST)
• RE: Bellsouth clueful? McBurnett, Jim (Sat Mar 22 2003 - 10:31:19 EST)
• RE: Problems with AT&T Mohammed Al Sukkar (Sat Mar 22 2003 - 11:59:21 EST)
• Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Hank Nussbacher (Sat Mar 22 2003 - 12:28:41 EST)
• SBCIS DNS resolved (Re: OT: need SBCIS (7132) contact with DNS clue) E.B. Dreger (Sat Mar 22 2003 - 13:32:27 EST)
• Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Peter E. Fry (Sat Mar 22 2003 - 14:18:26 EST)
• Re: (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing (no name) (Sat Mar 22 2003 - 14:37:07 EST)
• Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Sat Mar 22 2003 - 15:09:00 EST)
• Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (no email) (Sun Mar 23 2003 - 19:21:13 EST)
• Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Stephen J. Wilcox (Sun Mar 23 2003 - 20:15:10 EST)
• different use of a backhoe Peter Galbavy (Mon Mar 24 2003 - 06:28:09 EST)
• Re: (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing Joe Provo (Mon Mar 24 2003 - 11:01:39 EST)
• Re: (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing Bill Woodcock (Mon Mar 24 2003 - 12:01:04 EST)
• Re: different use of a backhoe Christopher L. Morrow (Mon Mar 24 2003 - 12:21:46 EST)
• RE: different use of a backhoe Warren Kumari (Mon Mar 24 2003 - 12:56:20 EST)
• Al Jazeera DOSed or just lots of traffic Sean Donelan (Mon Mar 24 2003 - 18:31:55 EST)
• clued-in AOL postmaster? Will Yardley (Mon Mar 24 2003 - 18:51:09 EST)
• Re: Al Jazeera DOSed or just lots of traffic Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri (Mon Mar 24 2003 - 23:59:32 EST)
• Re: Al Jazeera DOSed or just lots of traffic james (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 00:13:13 EST)
• Re: Al Jazeera DOSed or just lots of traffic Sean Donelan (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 01:17:21 EST)
• Re: Al Jazeera DOSed or just lots of traffic james (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 01:42:47 EST)
• Re: Al Jazeera DOSed or just lots of traffic Jeff Kell (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 01:47:48 EST)
• Re: Al Jazeera DOSed or just lots of traffic Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 04:40:25 EST)
• Anyone using Finisar OC-n GBICS? Alex Rubenstein (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 05:52:41 EST)
• Gifts for a CTO who has everything ... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 08:11:46 EST)
• Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Christian Liendo (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 09:06:01 EST)
• Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Haesu (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 09:21:21 EST)
• Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Rafi Sadowsky (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 09:33:15 EST)
• Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Christian Liendo (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 09:58:39 EST)
• Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks John Kristoff (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 10:10:04 EST)
• Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Haesu (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 10:12:54 EST)
• Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks fingers (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 10:19:29 EST)
• RE: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Jim Deleskie (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 10:33:43 EST)
• ASN allocation update Rob Thomas (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 11:05:26 EST)
• Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Christopher L. Morrow (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 11:50:32 EST)
• Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Christopher L. Morrow (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 11:58:59 EST)
• RE: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Christopher L. Morrow (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 12:00:33 EST)
• Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Haesu (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 12:27:59 EST)
• Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Jack Bates (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 12:41:49 EST)
• Re: clued-in AOL postmaster? Daniel Golding (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 15:13:27 EST)
• Domain oddity - possibly early warning... Rodney Joffe (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 18:35:40 EST)
• Syn Flood Christopher Bird (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 22:55:41 EST)
• Re: Syn Flood Johannes Ullrich (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 23:06:20 EST)
• RE: Syn Flood Ron Harris (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 23:12:38 EST)
• Re: Syn Flood Jack Bates (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 23:22:04 EST)
• Re: Syn Flood Michael Painter (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 00:22:47 EST)
• Lock Down (was Re: Syn Flood) Mike Lewinski (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 00:26:51 EST)
• The weak link? DNS Sean Donelan (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 04:09:06 EST)
• how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Paul Vixie (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 10:24:18 EST)
• Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Dave Israel (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 10:33:25 EST)
• Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (no name) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 08:48:32 EST)
• Re: The weak link? DNS Leo Bicknell (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 10:45:59 EST)
• Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (no name) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 08:58:18 EST)
• Re: Domain oddity - possibly early warning... Matt Larson (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 10:57:48 EST)
• suggestion for IBX in Washington DC K. Scott Bethke (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:02:27 EST)
• Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Jeffrey C. Ollie (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:18:13 EST)
• opentrasit.net problem? Miguel Mata-Cardona (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:29:38 EST)
• Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Bill Woodcock (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:31:40 EST)
• Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Dave Israel (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:37:17 EST)
• Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Niels Bakker (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:47:05 EST)
• Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (no name) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:50:04 EST)
• Re: [Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS)] Joshua Smith (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:52:41 EST)
• RE: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Kuhtz, Christian (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:59:02 EST)
• Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) E.B. Dreger (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 12:10:51 EST)
• RE: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) E.B. Dreger (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 12:38:50 EST)
• RE: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (no name) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 13:00:57 EST)
• Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (no name) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:14:45 EST)
• RE: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Scott Weeks (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 13:12:11 EST)
• RE: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) E.B. Dreger (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 13:19:16 EST)
• Re: [Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS)] Jeffrey C. Ollie (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 13:23:34 EST)
• RE: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Kuhtz, Christian (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 13:30:52 EST)
• Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (no name) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 13:32:30 EST)
• how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Pedro R Marques (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 14:20:45 EST)
• Florida hostmaster (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 15:51:39 EST)
• Re: The weak link? DNS Matt Buford (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 14:59:53 EST)
• Odd DNS Traffic Support Team (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 16:00:38 EST)
• Re: The weak link? DNS Sean Donelan (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 16:04:35 EST)
• Re: suggestion for IBX in Washington DC (no name) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 16:13:23 EST)
• Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Paul Vixie (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 16:22:59 EST)
• Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) E.B. Dreger (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 16:32:56 EST)
• Contact with Clue at XO? Eric Whitehill (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 16:41:08 EST)
• Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Simon Lyall (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 16:55:08 EST)
• RE: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Charles Sprickman (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 16:57:28 EST)
• Re: Contact with Clue at XO? Eric Whitehill (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 17:00:46 EST)
• Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) E.B. Dreger (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 17:07:49 EST)
• RE: Odd DNS Traffic McBurnett, Jim (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 17:24:05 EST)
• Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Bruce Pinsky (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 18:14:23 EST)
• summary (Re: how to get people to upgrade?) Paul Vixie (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 18:55:28 EST)
• Re: summary (Re: how to get people to upgrade?) E.B. Dreger (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 19:10:17 EST)
• Classified Len Rose (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 00:37:37 EST)
• Both Iraqi state provider Uruklink.net name servers offline Sean Donelan (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 02:57:23 EST)
• Re: good networking Petri Helenius (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 03:25:22 EST)
• Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 03:46:54 EST)
• Curing the BIND pain (no name) (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 04:32:34 EST)
• Re: Both Iraqi state provider Uruklink.net name servers offline Brian McWilliams (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 08:23:03 EST)
• Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Paul Vixie (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 08:53:19 EST)
• Re: Curing the BIND pain Nathan J. Mehl (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 09:24:56 EST)
• Re: Domain oddity - possibly early warning... Rodney Joffe (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 10:05:58 EST)
• aljazeera.net domain owned. Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 11:14:13 EST)
• Re: aljazeera.net domain owned. Subhi S Hashwa (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 11:29:41 EST)
• Re: aljazeera.net domain owned. Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 11:45:26 EST)
• Re: Curing the BIND pain Andy Dills (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 15:12:50 EST)
• Re: aljazeera.net domain owned. Sean Donelan (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 15:33:21 EST)
• Verizon mail server on MAPS RSS list Josh Gentry (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 15:40:00 EST)
• burst.net DDoS? Danny (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 15:46:40 EST)
• RE: burst.net DDoS? Todd Mitchell - lists (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 15:59:11 EST)
• Re: Verizon mail server on MAPS RSS list Richard Welty (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 15:59:22 EST)
• Re: burst.net DDoS? Allan Liska (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 16:02:47 EST)
• Re: Verizon mail server on MAPS RSS list Vinny Abello (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 16:13:43 EST)
• Re: aljazeera.net domain owned. Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 16:30:38 EST)
• Re: aljazeera.net domain owned. John Palmer (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 16:48:29 EST)
• Re[2]: Verizon mail server on MAPS RSS list Richard Welty (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 16:48:19 EST)
• Re: aljazeera.net domain owned. Mike Tancsa (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 17:04:28 EST)
• Problems on internet today ? James-lists (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 18:15:55 EST)
• Re: Problems on internet today ? Sean Donelan (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 19:43:54 EST)
• Re: Problems on internet today ? James-lists (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 19:50:05 EST)
• Re: Verizon mail server on MAPS RSS list (no name) (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 22:56:08 EST)
• Re: Verizon mail server on MAPS RSS list Jack Bates (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 23:32:46 EST)
• Iraq Telecom Facility Jeffrey Meltzer (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 00:25:19 EST)
• Re: Iraq Telecom Facility Sean Donelan (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 01:24:40 EST)
• Re: Problems on internet today ? Sean Donelan (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 01:26:20 EST)
• Photographs of Iraqi telecomunication facilities Sean Donelan (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 03:24:50 EST)
• The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 06:00:01 EST)
• Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Andre Chapuis (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:08:44 EST)
• is this true or... ? Tomas Daniska (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:09:23 EST)
• DNS dDos Attack! Dan Armstrong (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:20:20 EST)
• Re: DNS dDos Attack! Stephen J. Wilcox (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:39:02 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? Steven M. Bellovin (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:40:42 EST)
• Re: DNS dDos Attack! Dan Armstrong (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:28:48 EST)
• Re: DNS dDos Attack! Jared Mauch (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:49:46 EST)
• Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Charles H. Gucker (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:47:16 EST)
• Re: DNS dDos Attack! Kevin Houle (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:52:40 EST)
• Fw: Freedom to Tinker: Use a Firewall, Go to Jail Peter Galbavy (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:56:56 EST)
• Re: Freedom to Tinker: Use a Firewall, Go to Jail Peter Galbavy (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 10:01:04 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? Alfredo Sola (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 10:09:59 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? Steven M. Bellovin (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 10:16:00 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? Jack Bates (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 10:35:09 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? Steven M. Bellovin (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 10:36:15 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? Steven M. Bellovin (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 10:45:22 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? Scott W Brim (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 10:47:04 EST)
• Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Christopher L. Morrow (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 10:59:41 EST)
• Re: Verizon mail server on MAPS RSS list Christopher X. Candreva (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 11:04:27 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? batz (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 10:58:27 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? blitz (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 12:06:56 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? Richard Irving (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 12:24:08 EST)
• OT: FW: About your using mailer Mike Damm (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 12:44:25 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? Sean Donelan (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 12:55:09 EST)
• RE: FW: About your using mailer Kris Foster (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 12:51:00 EST)
• Re: [OT: FW: About your using mailer] Joshua Smith (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:01:00 EST)
• Re: [OT: FW: About your using mailer] Dave Israel (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:07:25 EST)
• Re: FW: About your using mailer Jeff Kell (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:23:39 EST)
• 69/8 revisited (no name) (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:36:28 EST)
• Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Eric Gauthier (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:42:26 EST)
• RE: FW: About your using mailer Kris Foster (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:37:06 EST)
• The backhoes are coming out of hibernation (Boston/New York) Sean Donelan (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:45:32 EST)
• Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Dave Israel (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:53:13 EST)
• Re 7/8 - was Re: 69/8 revisited John Palmer (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:54:43 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? Richard Irving (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:59:02 EST)
• Re: Re 7/8 - was Re: 69/8 revisited Haesu (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:59:59 EST)
• Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Sean Donelan (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:02:36 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? (no name) (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:07:24 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? Nathan E Norman (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:14:36 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? Richard Irving (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:31:08 EST)
• Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Dave Israel (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:32:58 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? Richard Irving (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:34:15 EST)
• RE: [OT: FW: About your using mailer] Mike Damm (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:36:10 EST)
• RE: is this true or... ? Ejay Hire (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:42:31 EST)
• Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Sean Donelan (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:44:00 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? Scott Weeks (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:44:28 EST)
• Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Eric Gauthier (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:50:58 EST)
• Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Dan Hollis (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:53:14 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? Scott Weeks (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:51:14 EST)
• Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Dave Israel (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:54:38 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? Richard Irving (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 15:08:08 EST)
• Re: Curing the BIND pain Crist J. Clark (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 15:31:24 EST)
• Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Sean Donelan (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 16:19:03 EST)
• RE: [OT: FW: About your using mailer] just me (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 16:34:25 EST)
• Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Dave Israel (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 16:54:09 EST)
• Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Petri Helenius (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 17:05:05 EST)
• Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Andy Dills (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 17:44:34 EST)
• OUTAGE: Known Iraq public Internet service Sean Donelan (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 18:20:54 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? David Schwartz (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 19:31:44 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? Steven M. Bellovin (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 19:47:25 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? David Schwartz (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 20:24:07 EST)
• More Gifts for a CTO who has everything ... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Sat Mar 29 2003 - 10:18:25 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? Lars Erik Gullerud (Sat Mar 29 2003 - 13:42:39 EST)
• more sendmail fun. Len Rose (Sat Mar 29 2003 - 16:25:12 EST)
• sendmail 8.12.9 available (fwd) (no name) (Sat Mar 29 2003 - 20:18:14 EST)
• Re: sendmail 8.12.9 available (fwd) Jack Bates (Sat Mar 29 2003 - 20:30:25 EST)
• Typo's in DNS, Al Jazeera back online Sean Donelan (Sat Mar 29 2003 - 22:57:01 EST)
• State Super-DMCA Too True William Allen Simpson (Sat Mar 29 2003 - 15:53:32 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True E.B. Dreger (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 00:11:29 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 00:22:11 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True E.B. Dreger (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 00:42:40 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Kevin Loch (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 02:32:32 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Tony Rall (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 02:42:42 EST)
• Re: OUTAGE: Known Iraq public Internet service Sean Donelan (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 03:24:38 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Larry J. Blunk (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 03:58:17 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Simon Lyall (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 04:04:50 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 04:12:35 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 04:25:19 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Mike Lyon (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 04:50:22 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Avleen Vig (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 08:51:58 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 10:07:46 EST)
• Re: is this true or... ? David Lesher (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 10:22:08 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Robert A. Hayden (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 10:34:05 EST)
• RE: State Super-DMCA Too True McBurnett, Jim (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 10:34:28 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 11:08:08 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Larry J. Blunk (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 11:16:50 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 11:23:59 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Michael Airhart (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 11:44:28 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Larry J. Blunk (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 11:55:44 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Avleen Vig (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 12:24:13 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True David Lesher (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 12:49:45 EST)
• NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Jack Bates (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 12:59:06 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 13:09:56 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Alex Lambert (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 13:19:01 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Niels Bakker (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 13:39:04 EST)
• RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) todd glassey (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 14:04:07 EST)
• Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Jared Mauch (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 14:07:34 EST)
• Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Rafi Sadowsky (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 14:36:15 EST)
• Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Jack Bates (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 14:40:51 EST)
• RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) McBurnett, Jim (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 14:47:17 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Tony Rall (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 15:57:31 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Leo Bicknell (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 16:00:53 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True David Lesher (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 16:07:56 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 16:13:24 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 16:19:32 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 16:22:05 EST)
• Re[2]: State Super-DMCA Too True Richard Welty (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 16:48:20 EST)
• RE: State Super-DMCA Too True E.B. Dreger (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 17:10:45 EST)
• RE: State Super-DMCA Too True McBurnett, Jim (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 17:18:42 EST)
• RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (why not nanog-legal ?) McBurnett, Jim (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 17:21:00 EST)
• RE: State Super-DMCA Too True E.B. Dreger (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 17:27:20 EST)
• Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (why not nanog-legal ?) Mark Rogaski (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 17:53:15 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dave Howe (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 18:04:31 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 18:08:38 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 18:31:06 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True William Allen Simpson (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 09:39:26 EST)
• RE: State Super-DMCA Too True McBurnett, Jim (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 19:43:49 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Kevin Loch (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 20:04:41 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 20:34:54 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 20:46:02 EST)
• RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) todd glassey (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 21:20:13 EST)
• RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Krzysztof Adamski (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 21:53:34 EST)
• Wierd... McBurnett, Jim (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 22:23:19 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Bruce Pinsky (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 01:28:03 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Bruce Pinsky (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 01:26:08 EST)
• Internic whois Hank Nussbacher (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 02:48:27 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Peter Galbavy (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 03:21:06 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Neil J. McRae (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 03:31:52 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 03:49:29 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Richard A Steenbergen (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 05:14:45 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 08:18:42 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 08:33:23 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 08:44:19 EST)
• RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) todd glassey (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 10:05:56 EST)
• RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Kris Foster (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 10:04:36 EST)
• Remembers, Non-Op Topics Have a Home (was Re: State Super-DMCA Too True) Nathan J. Mehl (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 12:05:52 EST)
• Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Nathan J. Mehl (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 12:07:46 EST)
• RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) todd glassey (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 12:40:16 EST)
• RE: State Super-DMCA Too True todd glassey (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 12:50:28 EST)
• Current DF providers list? Deepak Jain (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 14:01:11 EST)
• Where fiber goes, backhoes soon follow: Camp Doha fiber link Sean Donelan (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 14:18:56 EST)
• Re: Where fiber goes, backhoes soon follow: Camp Doha fiber link Bill Woodcock (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 15:04:51 EST)
• Re: Where fiber goes, backhoes soon follow: Camp Doha fiber link Mark Barker (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 15:41:03 EST)
• RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) todd glassey (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 15:44:11 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Stephen Sprunk (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 15:50:50 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Stephen Sprunk (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 15:49:26 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Petri Helenius (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 16:08:15 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 16:16:46 EST)
• CFP: The Workshop on Rapid Malcode (WORM) (no name) (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 16:41:33 EST)
• RE: State Super-DMCA Too True todd glassey (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 16:45:23 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Petri Helenius (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 16:47:22 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Stephen Sprunk (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 17:32:18 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Matthew S. Hallacy (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 17:34:28 EST)
• RE: State Super-DMCA Too True todd glassey (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:07:11 EST)
• RE: State Super-DMCA Too True Kuhtz, Christian (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:12:30 EST)
• RE: State Super-DMCA Too True Kuhtz, Christian (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:16:42 EST)
• Invitation to join Friendster from Jeff Wheeler Jeff Wheeler (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:21:12 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Stephen Sprunk (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:30:13 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Stephen Sprunk (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:24:30 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Stephen Sprunk (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:32:52 EST)
• RE: State Super-DMCA Too True Kris Foster (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:30:05 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Richard A Steenbergen (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:46:47 EST)
• Re: [RE: State Super-DMCA Too True] Joshua Smith (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:48:03 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:54:15 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:59:50 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 19:11:31 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Stephen Sprunk (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 19:29:03 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 19:38:10 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Alex Lambert (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 19:53:36 EST)
• RE: State Super-DMCA Too True todd glassey (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 20:19:30 EST)
• RE: [RE: State Super-DMCA Too True] todd glassey (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 21:06:50 EST)
• internet.com Michael Painter (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:21:05 EST)
• Re: internet.com Michael Painter (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:45:17 EST)
• Re: internet.com E.B. Dreger (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:46:25 EST)
• Re: internet.com Patrick (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 23:01:20 EST)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Stephen Sprunk (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:57:23 EST)
• Re: internet.com Michael Painter (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 23:14:22 EST)
• Re: internet.com Rafi Sadowsky (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 23:33:31 EST)
• Re: internet.com Rodney Joffe (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 23:57:32 EST)

Last message date: Mon Mar 31 2003 - 23:59:04 EST
Archived on: Thu Dec 09 2004 - 16:07:05 EST

980 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
About this archive
Other mail archives