Nanog 0303
By Author

980 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
About this archive
Other mail archives

Starting: Sat Mar 01 2003 - 00:08:34 EST
Ending: Mon Mar 31 2003 - 23:59:04 EST

• (no email)
  • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (Sun Mar 23 2003 - 19:21:13 EST)
  • Re: Problems with AT&T (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 12:27:33 EST)
  • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 12:11:47 EST)
  • RE: Problems with AT&T (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 11:59:11 EST)
  • RE: Problems with AT&T (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 19:13:02 EST)
  • Re: Problems with AT&T (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 15:26:35 EST)
  • Re: Co-lo best practices on IP allocations (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 15:14:52 EST)
  • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 14:51:45 EST)
  • Re: scope of the 69/8 problem (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 14:39:57 EST)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:29:10 EST)
• (no name)
  • CFP: The Workshop on Rapid Malcode (WORM) (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 16:41:33 EST)
  • sendmail 8.12.9 available (fwd) (Sat Mar 29 2003 - 20:18:14 EST)
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:07:24 EST)
  • 69/8 revisited (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:36:28 EST)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 06:00:01 EST)
  • Re: Verizon mail server on MAPS RSS list (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 22:56:08 EST)
  • Curing the BIND pain (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 04:32:34 EST)
  • Re: suggestion for IBX in Washington DC (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 16:13:23 EST)
  • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 13:32:30 EST)
  • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:14:45 EST)
  • RE: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 13:00:57 EST)
  • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:50:04 EST)
  • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 08:58:18 EST)
  • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 08:48:32 EST)
  • Re: (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing (Sat Mar 22 2003 - 14:37:07 EST)
  • Re: (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 18:27:12 EST)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 06:00:01 EST)
  • Re: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 23:38:35 EST)
  • RE: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 21:02:37 EST)
  • Re: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 21:01:08 EST)
  • Re: 69/8 revisited (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 17:01:45 EST)
  • Re: 69/8 revisited (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 13:53:13 EST)
  • Re: 69/8 revisited (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 13:26:31 EST)
  • Re: whois.crsnic.net down? (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 13:09:56 EST)
  • whois.crsnic.net down? (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 13:20:48 EST)
  • RE: OpenSSL (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 11:57:05 EST)
  • Re: OpenSSL (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 10:36:48 EST)
  • Re: OpenSSL (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 10:03:41 EST)
  • Re: OpenSSL (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 05:23:31 EST)
  • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 10:01:32 EST)
  • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 09:42:03 EST)
  • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 01:42:12 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their (Sun Mar 16 2003 - 18:15:11 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 23:48:44 EST)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 06:00:00 EST)
  • RE: Gender and other protocol issues (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 08:18:42 EST)
  • Re: att.net domain expired (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 02:11:38 EST)
  • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 22:01:25 EST)
  • Re: cw to att? issue? (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:49:59 EST)
  • Re: Getting a Host Record (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 18:53:39 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:21:35 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:20:03 EST)
  • 69/8 is harder to fix than it looks at first glance (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:11:22 EST)
  • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:03:00 EST)
  • Re: Route Supression Problem (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 09:01:23 EST)
  • Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 04:36:25 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:52:07 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:37:29 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:49:35 EST)
  • Re: scope of the 69/8 problem (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:51:22 EST)
  • OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 12:55:38 EST)
  • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 11:07:18 EST)
  • RE: Move all 9-1-1 to 8-5-5 (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:40:37 EST)
  • RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 08:50:09 EST)
  • Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 07:48:44 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 06:18:37 EST)
  • Re: Move all 9-1-1 to 8-5-5 (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 06:11:04 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 22:18:51 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:51:17 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:15:36 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:56:10 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:38:15 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:07:55 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:02:42 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:54:50 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:52:06 EST)
  • Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 05:00:01 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 04:46:33 EST)
  • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 19:28:39 EST)
  • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 19:13:36 EST)
  • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:55:47 EST)
  • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:59:05 EST)
  • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:35:11 EST)
  • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 13:31:41 EST)
  • RE: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:24:21 EST)
  • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:58:45 EST)
  • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:29:56 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:23:29 EST)
  • RE: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practic e (please comment) (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 01:07:45 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 18:42:13 EST)
  • 69/8...this sucks (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 19:33:47 EST)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 06:00:02 EST)
  • ISP recommendation for Mumbai (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 09:14:50 EST)
  • Re: Why replicate the DNS? (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 04:27:28 EST)
  • Why replicate the DNS? (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 07:44:56 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 07:04:10 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 04:26:02 EST)
  • Re: Tools (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:41:12 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:06:45 EST)
  • Re: Tools (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 11:30:49 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 11:15:45 EST)
  • Tools (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:44:34 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:38:17 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:23:34 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:06:20 EST)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:04:10 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 09:51:01 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 06:53:51 EST)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 17:06:09 EST)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 14:28:49 EST)
  • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 14:07:18 EST)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 13:02:13 EST)
  • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 10:45:07 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 04:57:25 EST)
  • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 01:07:53 EST)
  • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 00:15:52 EST)
• Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
  • aljazeera.net domain owned. (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 11:14:13 EST)
  • Re: Al Jazeera DOSed or just lots of traffic (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 04:40:25 EST)
  • Re: Al Jazeera DOSed or just lots of traffic (Mon Mar 24 2003 - 23:59:32 EST)
• Adam Debus
  • Re: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:40:39 EST)
• Adam Kujawski
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:09:25 EST)
• Adam Rothschild
  • Re: Route Supression Problem (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:03:49 EST)
  • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:42:02 EST)
• Alan Hannan
  • Re: route filtering in large networks (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 22:47:09 EST)
• Alan Sato
  • RE: Nortel SHASTA (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 17:25:10 EST)
• Alec H. Peterson
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:58:10 EST)
• Alex Lambert
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 19:53:36 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 13:19:01 EST)
• Alex Rubenstein
  • Anyone using Finisar OC-n GBICS? (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 05:52:41 EST)
• Alfredo Sola
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 10:09:59 EST)
• Allan Liska
  • Re: burst.net DDoS? (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 16:02:47 EST)
• Andre Chapuis
  • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:08:44 EST)
• Andrew Dorsett
  • Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 08:53:45 EST)
  • Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:05:05 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 00:51:51 EST)
• Andrew Newton
  • Re: Tools (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 11:32:56 EST)
• Andy Dills
  • Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 17:44:34 EST)
  • Re: Curing the BIND pain (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 15:12:50 EST)
  • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 21:39:02 EST)
  • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:47:41 EST)
  • Re: Co-lo best practices on IP allocations (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 17:20:08 EST)
  • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 01:11:06 EST)
  • Re: route filtering in large networks (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 00:21:10 EST)
  • route filtering in large networks (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 22:22:53 EST)
  • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 21:27:51 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:02:44 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:44:55 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:44:06 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:30:11 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:10:46 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:11:23 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 12:50:35 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:52:13 EST)
  • Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment) (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 13:25:55 EST)
  • Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment) (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 12:30:11 EST)
  • RE: OT: level3 contact (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 16:40:49 EST)
  • Re: OT: level3 contact (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 16:03:55 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 02:22:39 EST)
  • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 15:13:15 EST)
• Andy Walden
  • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 12:31:30 EST)
• Antony Antony
  • RE: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 11:35:24 EST)
• Avi Freedman
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 06:12:49 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 17:25:20 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 00:02:14 EST)
• Avleen Vig
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 12:24:13 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 08:51:58 EST)
  • Req contact: "Kindhosts", PA (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 15:59:48 EST)
• Barry Raveendran Greene
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:17:55 EST)
• batz
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 10:58:27 EST)
  • Re: DSL-IP Probes Curiousity.. (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 02:17:02 EST)
• Bill Woodcock
  • Re: Where fiber goes, backhoes soon follow: Camp Doha fiber link (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 15:04:51 EST)
  • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:31:40 EST)
  • Re: (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing (Mon Mar 24 2003 - 12:01:04 EST)
• blitz
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 12:06:56 EST)
  • Re: spamcop.net? (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 14:52:06 EST)
  • RE: spamcop.net? (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 03:17:52 EST)
  • spamcop.net? (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 21:41:21 EST)
• Bowers, Brent (CCI-San Diego)
  • RE: Open source / GPL Ip address management software. (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 14:55:20 EST)
• Bradley Dunn
  • Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:17:41 EST)
  • Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 05:43:15 EST)
• Brandon Butterworth
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 19:40:10 EST)
• brett watson
  • Re: Problems with AT&T (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 14:47:55 EST)
• Brian McWilliams
  • Re: Both Iraqi state provider Uruklink.net name servers offline (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 08:23:03 EST)
• Bruce Pinsky
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 01:26:08 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 01:28:03 EST)
  • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 18:14:23 EST)
  • Re: att.net domain expired (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 03:58:39 EST)
• Callis, Adam
  • RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:37:15 EST)
• Charles E. Youse
  • Re: Problems with AT&T (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 13:09:06 EST)
• Charles H. Gucker
  • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:47:16 EST)
• Charles Sprickman
  • RE: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 16:57:28 EST)
  • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:42:41 EST)
  • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:36:18 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 18:22:14 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 19:16:29 EST)
• Charlie Clemmer
  • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 14:43:56 EST)
  • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 14:32:38 EST)
• Chris Adams
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 22:56:01 EST)
• Christian Liendo
  • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 09:58:39 EST)
  • Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 09:06:01 EST)
• Christopher Bird
  • Syn Flood (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 22:55:41 EST)
• Christopher L. Morrow
  • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 10:59:41 EST)
  • RE: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 12:00:33 EST)
  • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 11:58:59 EST)
  • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 11:50:32 EST)
  • Re: different use of a backhoe (Mon Mar 24 2003 - 12:21:46 EST)
  • Re: route filtering in large networks (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 01:50:23 EST)
  • Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 22:28:07 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:50:29 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:30:27 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:44:30 EST)
  • Re: spamcop.net? (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 00:01:00 EST)
  • Re: spamcop.net? (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 21:51:45 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 13:42:34 EST)
• Christopher X. Candreva
  • Re: Verizon mail server on MAPS RSS list (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 11:04:27 EST)
• chuck goolsbee
  • RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:34:45 EST)
  • Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 23:03:14 EST)
  • Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 22:14:07 EST)
  • Re: spamcop.net? (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 14:53:39 EST)
• Cottrell, Les
  • RE: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 11:29:16 EST)
  • RE: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 18:52:08 EST)
  • RE: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 17:00:17 EST)
  • RE: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:13:53 EST)
  • RE: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:43:58 EST)
  • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:04:20 EST)
• Crist J. Clark
  • Re: Curing the BIND pain (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 15:31:24 EST)
  • Getting a Host Record (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:25:15 EST)
• Cutler, James R
  • Gender and other protocol issues (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 22:44:05 EST)
  • RE: scope of the 69/8 problem (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:58:29 EST)
  • RE: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practic e (please comment) (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 09:11:31 EST)
  • RE: DNS records for routers (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 06:16:59 EST)
• Dan Armstrong
  • Re: DNS dDos Attack! (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:28:48 EST)
  • DNS dDos Attack! (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:20:20 EST)
• Dan Hollis
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 19:38:10 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:59:50 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 08:33:23 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 20:46:02 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 20:34:54 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 18:08:38 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 16:22:05 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 16:13:24 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 04:12:35 EST)
  • Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:53:14 EST)
  • RE: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 19:56:02 EST)
  • Re: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 17:01:42 EST)
• Daniel Abbey
  • Co-lo best practices on IP allocations (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 11:56:45 EST)
  • FW: Controlling outbound traffic in a multihomed BGP environment (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 11:20:24 EST)
• Daniel Concepcion
  • Re: [Q] Stable Service Provider IOS Version? (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 10:04:28 EST)
• Daniel Golding
  • Re: clued-in AOL postmaster? (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 15:13:27 EST)
  • RE: OT: level3 contact (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:01:22 EST)
• Daniel Karrenberg
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 10:08:43 EST)
• Daniel Roesen
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:10:35 EST)
• Danny
  • burst.net DDoS? (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 15:46:40 EST)
  • Tech contact for IXEurope/ixsolutions? (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 22:32:51 EST)
• Danny McPherson
  • Re: Route Supression Problem (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 14:49:47 EST)
  • Re: Route Supression Problem (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 13:53:51 EST)
  • Re: Route Supression Problem (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 13:27:06 EST)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 11:59:11 EST)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:52:01 EST)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:19:11 EST)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 10:48:07 EST)
• Dave Howe
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 18:04:31 EST)
• Dave Israel
  • Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 16:54:09 EST)
  • Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:54:38 EST)
  • Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:32:58 EST)
  • Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:53:13 EST)
  • Re: [OT: FW: About your using mailer] (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:07:25 EST)
  • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:37:17 EST)
  • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 10:33:25 EST)
  • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:36:46 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:55:41 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:13:16 EST)
• David Barak
  • RE: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practic e (please comment) (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:52:46 EST)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:19:58 EST)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 22:54:26 EST)
• David Conrad
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 11:29:42 EST)
• David G. Andersen
  • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 12:59:55 EST)
  • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:43:00 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:37:51 EST)
• David Lesher
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 16:07:56 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 12:49:45 EST)
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 10:22:08 EST)
  • Re: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 21:34:52 EST)
  • Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:00:25 EST)
  • Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:33:54 EST)
  • Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 10:11:32 EST)
  • Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 09:40:17 EST)
• David Luyer
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 07:41:45 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 06:03:12 EST)
• David Schwartz
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 20:24:07 EST)
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 19:31:44 EST)
• David Scott Olverson
  • Trend and analysis tools (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 13:21:26 EST)
• Deepak Jain
  • Current DF providers list? (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 14:01:11 EST)
  • (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:58:44 EST)
  • RE: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 20:52:13 EST)
• Dominic J. Eidson
  • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 17:01:55 EST)
• Dorian Kim
  • Re: route filtering in large networks (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 14:38:51 EST)
• Doug Barton
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:58:20 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:00:15 EST)
• Douglas F. Calvert
  • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 08:10:12 EST)
• Dr. Jeffrey Race
  • RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this [degenerate linguistic usage elided) (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 03:50:22 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 02:13:39 EST)
  • Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 02:01:51 EST)
  • RE: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practic e (please comment) (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:17:56 EST)
  • Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment) (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 10:28:20 EST)
  • Re: [Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment)] (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 02:41:44 EST)
  • Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment) (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 02:32:38 EST)
  • Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment) (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 10:55:25 EST)
• Drew Weaver
  • RE: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:57:22 EST)
  • OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:46:51 EST)
• E.B. Dreger
  • Re: internet.com (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:46:25 EST)
  • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 17:27:20 EST)
  • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 17:10:45 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 00:42:40 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 00:11:29 EST)
  • Re: summary (Re: how to get people to upgrade?) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 19:10:17 EST)
  • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 17:07:49 EST)
  • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 16:32:56 EST)
  • RE: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 13:19:16 EST)
  • RE: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 12:38:50 EST)
  • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 12:10:51 EST)
  • SBCIS DNS resolved (Re: OT: need SBCIS (7132) contact with DNS clue) (Sat Mar 22 2003 - 13:32:27 EST)
  • Re: OT: need SBCIS (7132) contact with DNS clue (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 18:30:05 EST)
  • OT: need SBCIS (7132) contact with DNS clue (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 17:44:15 EST)
  • Re: route filtering in large networks (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 11:13:39 EST)
  • Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 08:15:53 EST)
  • RE: scope of the 69/8 problem (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 19:26:28 EST)
  • scope of the 69/8 problem (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:22:54 EST)
  • 202/7 (RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering..) (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:10:55 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:07:25 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:30:20 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:18:33 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:20:13 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:52:13 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:49:04 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:28:23 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:44:11 EST)
  • RE: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practic e (please comment) (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:52:50 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:45:43 EST)
  • Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:18:52 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:16:35 EST)
  • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:45:19 EST)
  • RE: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:36:18 EST)
  • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:25:26 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 01:36:04 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 01:17:55 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 14:02:50 EST)
  • Re: Root server error (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 22:20:49 EST)
• Ejay Hire
  • RE: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:42:31 EST)
  • Need Multicast Feed. (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 10:52:45 EST)
  • RE: Controlling outbound traffic in a multihomed BGP environment (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 11:39:11 EST)
  • RE: att.net domain expired (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 04:06:20 EST)
  • att.net domain expired (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 03:46:12 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 12:33:57 EST)
• Eric A. Hall
  • Re: Why replicate the DNS? (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 09:06:12 EST)
• Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
  • More Gifts for a CTO who has everything ... (Sat Mar 29 2003 - 10:18:25 EST)
  • Re: aljazeera.net domain owned. (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 16:30:38 EST)
  • Re: aljazeera.net domain owned. (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 11:45:26 EST)
  • Gifts for a CTO who has everything ... (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 08:11:46 EST)
  • Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 (Sat Mar 22 2003 - 15:09:00 EST)
  • Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:44:01 EST)
  • Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:24:05 EST)
• Eric Gauthier
  • Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:50:58 EST)
  • Allegiance telecom boston colo down? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:42:26 EST)
• Eric Germann
  • RE: Initial network impacts post-US attack 3/19/03 (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 14:34:07 EST)
  • RE: Code red- Returning? (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 13:05:37 EST)
  • New MS and CERT Warning (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 16:45:21 EST)
  • 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 14:57:22 EST)
• Eric Osborne
  • Re: Problems with AT&T (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 16:29:29 EST)
• Eric Rescorla
  • Re: OpenSSL (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 10:48:10 EST)
  • Re: OpenSSL (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 09:18:42 EST)
• Eric Whitehill
  • Re: Contact with Clue at XO? (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 17:00:46 EST)
  • Contact with Clue at XO? (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 16:41:08 EST)
• Etaoin Shrdlu
  • Amateurs suck (was [snip] (was Re: 69/8...this [degenerate linguistic usage elided)) (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 11:33:54 EST)
• fingers
  • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 10:19:29 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:56:29 EST)
• Frank Scalzo
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 21:25:39 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:41:56 EST)
• Geo.
  • Re: Root server error (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 20:15:56 EST)
• Gerard White
  • Nortel SHASTA (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 13:57:56 EST)
• German Martinez
  • Problems with AT&T (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 11:27:01 EST)
• Gordon Ewasiuk
  • Clueful Engineer at C&W Needed - OC-3 Problem (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 08:55:45 EST)
• Grant A. Kirkwood
  • Re: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 20:03:45 EST)
• Greg Maxwell
  • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:21:39 EST)
• Gregory Hicks
  • Re: Getting a Host Record (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:53:28 EST)
• Haesu
  • Re: Re 7/8 - was Re: 69/8 revisited (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:59:59 EST)
  • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 12:27:59 EST)
  • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 10:12:54 EST)
  • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 09:21:21 EST)
  • Re: cw to att? issue? (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:51:51 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 22:44:43 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 11:18:29 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:54:54 EST)
• Hank Nussbacher
  • Internic whois (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 02:48:27 EST)
  • Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 (Sat Mar 22 2003 - 12:28:41 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:30:15 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:34:24 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:20:10 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:15:30 EST)
  • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 13:07:05 EST)
• hostmaster
  • Florida (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 15:51:39 EST)
• Huopio Kauto
  • RE: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 09:08:11 EST)
• Ian Finlay
  • VU#464113 - TCP/IP implementations handle unusual flag combinations inconsistently (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 12:45:12 EST)
• Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: route filtering in large networks (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 03:06:47 EST)
  • Re: Route Supression Problem (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 14:02:24 EST)
  • Re: Route Supression Problem (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:54:51 EST)
  • Re: Route Supression Problem (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:06:23 EST)
  • Re: Route Supression Problem (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 08:42:49 EST)
  • Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 05:11:16 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 17:42:22 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:04:47 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 12:05:34 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 07:24:54 EST)
  • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 05:32:56 EST)
  • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:41:15 EST)
  • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 08:25:25 EST)
  • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:49:01 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:44:14 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 07:06:04 EST)
  • Re: Tools (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 13:05:13 EST)
  • Re: Tools (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 11:46:02 EST)
  • Re: Tools (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 11:02:58 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 06:33:47 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 15:09:14 EST)
• J.A. Terranson
  • Re: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 20:40:31 EST)
  • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:06:11 EST)
• Jack Bates
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 19:11:31 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:54:15 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 08:44:19 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 08:18:42 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 03:49:29 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 18:31:06 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 16:19:32 EST)
  • Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 14:40:51 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 13:09:56 EST)
  • NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 12:59:06 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 11:23:59 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 11:08:08 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 10:07:46 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 00:22:11 EST)
  • Re: sendmail 8.12.9 available (fwd) (Sat Mar 29 2003 - 20:30:25 EST)
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 10:35:09 EST)
  • Re: Verizon mail server on MAPS RSS list (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 23:32:46 EST)
  • Re: Syn Flood (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 23:22:04 EST)
  • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 12:41:49 EST)
  • Re: Your message to "<>" (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 23:08:36 EST)
  • Re: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 22:04:35 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their (Sun Mar 16 2003 - 18:35:25 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 23:57:30 EST)
  • Re: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their securitysystem] (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 23:27:03 EST)
  • Re: route filtering in large networks (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 23:59:18 EST)
  • Re: route filtering in large networks (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 23:04:51 EST)
  • Re: 69/8 problem -- Would CNN care? (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 21:59:27 EST)
  • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 21:29:04 EST)
  • Re: Route Supression Problem (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 16:28:50 EST)
  • Re: 69/8 problem -- Would CNN care? (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:28:23 EST)
  • Route Supression Problem (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 07:53:03 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:42:47 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:39:50 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:34:10 EST)
  • Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:28:28 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 22:27:56 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 19:17:28 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:42:40 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:39:26 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:02:10 EST)
  • Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:10:07 EST)
  • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:51:52 EST)
  • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:09:14 EST)
  • Question concerning authoritative bodies. (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 12:50:04 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 23:15:31 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:45:37 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 07:53:56 EST)
• james
  • Re: Al Jazeera DOSed or just lots of traffic (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 01:42:47 EST)
  • Re: Al Jazeera DOSed or just lots of traffic (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 00:13:13 EST)
  • Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:15:26 EST)
  • Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:51:24 EST)
  • Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:03:33 EST)
• James-lists
  • Re: Problems on internet today ? (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 19:50:05 EST)
  • Problems on internet today ? (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 18:15:55 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:48:02 EST)
• Jared Mauch
  • Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 14:07:34 EST)
  • Re: DNS dDos Attack! (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:49:46 EST)
  • Re: 69/8 revisited (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 12:57:44 EST)
  • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 01:31:08 EST)
  • Re: 69/8 problem -- Would CNN care? (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:26:23 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:55:47 EST)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 23:53:46 EST)
• Jason Lixfeld
  • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:35:54 EST)
• Jason Slagle
  • Bellsouth clueful? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 22:48:01 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:55:48 EST)
• JC Dill
  • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:36:55 EST)
  • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:01:00 EST)
  • Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:44:11 EST)
• Jeff Kell
  • Re: FW: About your using mailer (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:23:39 EST)
  • Re: Al Jazeera DOSed or just lots of traffic (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 01:47:48 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 23:36:18 EST)
• Jeff S Wheeler
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:23:52 EST)
• Jeff Wasilko
  • NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 18:01:22 EST)
• Jeff Wheeler
  • Invitation to join Friendster from Jeff Wheeler (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:21:12 EST)
• Jeffrey C. Ollie
  • Re: [Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS)] (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 13:23:34 EST)
  • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:18:13 EST)
• Jeffrey Meltzer
  • Iraq Telecom Facility (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 00:25:19 EST)
  • 60 Hudson (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 15:23:19 EST)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 14:50:30 EST)
• Jeremy T. Bouse
  • Re: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their securitysystem] (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 02:43:39 EST)
• Jessica Yu
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 18:49:16 EST)
• Jim Deleskie
  • RE: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 10:33:43 EST)
  • RE: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 14:01:58 EST)
  • RE: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 11:48:39 EST)
• Joe
  • Re: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 21:09:29 EST)
• Joe Abley
  • Re: 69/8 is harder to fix than it looks at first glance (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:24:03 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:30:32 EST)
  • Re: Why replicate the DNS? (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 21:58:20 EST)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 21:08:39 EST)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 15:15:59 EST)
• Joe Boyce
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:06:54 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:56:55 EST)
• joe mcguckin
  • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 21:26:08 EST)
  • Re: OT: level3 contact (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:12:32 EST)
  • OT: Need the name of a good Qwest account rep. (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:29:37 EST)
• Joe Provo
  • Re: (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing (Mon Mar 24 2003 - 11:01:39 EST)
• Joe St Sauver
  • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 18:14:49 EST)
• Joel Jaeggli
  • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 21:51:05 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 19:45:58 EST)
• Johannes Catterwell
  • Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 20:02:39 EST)
• Johannes Ullrich
  • Re: Syn Flood (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 23:06:20 EST)
  • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:48:07 EST)
  • Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:41:07 EST)
  • Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 12:53:48 EST)
• John Kristoff
  • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 10:10:04 EST)
  • Re: Route Supression Problem (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 09:05:17 EST)
• John L Crain
  • IPv4 Addresses update (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:56:01 EST)
• John L Lee
  • Re: ATM SVCs/Signalling (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 11:20:16 EST)
• John Murphy
  • Re: Port 80 Issues (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 01:49:46 EST)
  • Re: Port 80 Issues (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 00:01:29 EST)
  • Port 80 Issues (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:13:10 EST)
• John Palmer
  • Re 7/8 - was Re: 69/8 revisited (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:54:43 EST)
  • Re: aljazeera.net domain owned. (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 16:48:29 EST)
• John Payne
  • * * * SECURITY UPDATE * * * MRLG-4.2.4 Released * * * (fwd) (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 00:01:28 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their securitysystem] (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 23:43:31 EST)
• John R. Levine
  • Re: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their securitysystem] (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 10:01:47 EST)
• John Tran
  • APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (Sun Mar 16 2003 - 20:01:27 EST)
• Jonathan Claybaugh
  • Fwd: Re. Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:30:43 EST)
  • Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:11:52 EST)
• Josh Brooks
  • Ability of Genuity to rate limit on a /24 boundary (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 06:11:37 EST)
• Josh Gentry
  • Verizon mail server on MAPS RSS list (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 15:40:00 EST)
• Joshua Smith
  • Re: [RE: State Super-DMCA Too True] (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:48:03 EST)
  • Re: [OT: FW: About your using mailer] (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:01:00 EST)
  • Re: [Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS)] (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:52:41 EST)
  • Re: [Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks)] (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 11:43:26 EST)
  • Re: [Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering..] (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:40:57 EST)
  • Re: [Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment)] (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 13:17:35 EST)
• just me
  • RE: [OT: FW: About your using mailer] (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 16:34:25 EST)
  • Re: OT: need SBCIS (7132) contact with DNS clue (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 18:59:53 EST)
• k claffy
  • of marginal oper. interest [bgp reflecting actual traffic flow (or not)] (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 00:30:13 EST)
• K. Graham
  • Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 07:02:29 EST)
• K. Scott Bethke
  • suggestion for IBX in Washington DC (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:02:27 EST)
• Keptin Komrade Dr. BobWrench III esq.
  • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:50:44 EST)
• Kevin Houle
  • Re: DNS dDos Attack! (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:52:40 EST)
• Kevin Loch
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 20:04:41 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 02:32:32 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:22:16 EST)
• Kevin Oberman
  • Re: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:46:01 EST)
• Kris Foster
  • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:30:05 EST)
  • RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 10:04:36 EST)
  • RE: FW: About your using mailer (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:37:06 EST)
  • RE: FW: About your using mailer (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 12:51:00 EST)
  • RE: OT: level3 contact (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 16:04:41 EST)
• Krzysztof Adamski
  • RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 21:53:34 EST)
• Kuhtz, Christian
  • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:16:42 EST)
  • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:12:30 EST)
  • RE: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 13:30:52 EST)
  • RE: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:59:02 EST)
  • RE: BGP to doom us all (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 09:52:46 EST)
• Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 03:46:54 EST)
• Larry J. Blunk
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 11:55:44 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 11:16:50 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 03:58:17 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:00:33 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 15:01:01 EST)
• Larry Rosenman
  • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:31:28 EST)
  • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:42:24 EST)
• Lars Erik Gullerud
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Sat Mar 29 2003 - 13:42:39 EST)
  • Re: route filtering in large networks (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:45:36 EST)
• Lee Watterworth
  • RE: 69/8 problem -- Would CNN care? (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 11:35:07 EST)
  • 69/8 problem -- Would CNN care? (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:06:49 EST)
• Len Rose
  • more sendmail fun. (Sat Mar 29 2003 - 16:25:12 EST)
  • Classified (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 00:37:37 EST)
  • OpenSSL (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 04:39:31 EST)
• Leo Bicknell
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 16:00:53 EST)
  • Re: The weak link? DNS (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 10:45:59 EST)
  • Re: (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:39:42 EST)
  • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 10:28:10 EST)
  • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 09:18:04 EST)
  • Have address space? You too can make policy. (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 15:21:31 EST)
• leo vegoda
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 11:43:06 EST)
• Lucy E. Lynch
  • Re: Amateurs suck (was [snip] (was Re: 69/8...this [degenerate linguistic usage elided)) (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:04:51 EST)
  • Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:31:16 EST)
• M. David Leonard
  • Re: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 09:01:05 EST)
• Majdi S. Abbas
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 00:30:53 EST)
• marc van hoof
  • RE: Co-lo best practices on IP allocations (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 18:56:20 EST)
• Mark Barker
  • Re: Where fiber goes, backhoes soon follow: Camp Doha fiber link (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 15:41:03 EST)
• Mark Borchers
  • RE: ATM SVCs/Signalling (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 11:30:47 EST)
  • ATM SVCs/Signalling (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 10:19:59 EST)
  • RE: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 13:51:17 EST)
  • RE: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 19:04:07 EST)
• Mark Kasten
  • Re: cw to att? issue? (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:16:12 EST)
• Mark Radabaugh
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 12:21:39 EST)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:31:30 EST)
  • Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 10:20:43 EST)
• Mark Rogaski
  • Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (why not nanog-legal ?) (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 17:53:15 EST)
• Mark Segal
  • RE: Move all 9-1-1 to 8-5-5 (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:03:47 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:57:07 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:54:36 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:27:35 EST)
• Marshall Eubanks
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:10:24 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:26:38 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:58:29 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:49:54 EST)
• Martin Hannigan
  • Re: spamcop.net? (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 23:43:56 EST)
• Martin J. Levy
  • Re: OT: need SBCIS (7132) contact with DNS clue (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 18:17:24 EST)
• Matt Buford
  • Re: The weak link? DNS (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 14:59:53 EST)
• Matt Fearnow
  • Fw: ISS Security Brief: Remote Sendmail Header Processing Vulnerability (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 13:35:32 EST)
• Matt Larson
  • Re: Domain oddity - possibly early warning... (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 10:57:48 EST)
  • Re: Root server error (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 13:15:12 EST)
• Matt Martini
  • Draft client notice for 69/8 problems (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 13:58:36 EST)
  • [Q] Stable Service Provider IOS Version? (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:52:56 EST)
• Matt Ryan
  • RE: OpenSSL (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 12:54:31 EST)
  • RE: OpenSSL (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 10:58:30 EST)
• Matt Zimmerman
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 17:06:07 EST)
• Matthew Kaufman
  • Re: I need help finding SAN-FRANCISCO.CA.US Registrar (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 19:59:19 EST)
• Matthew S. Hallacy
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 17:34:28 EST)
• McBurnett, Jim
  • Wierd... (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 22:23:19 EST)
  • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 19:43:49 EST)
  • RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (why not nanog-legal ?) (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 17:21:00 EST)
  • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 17:18:42 EST)
  • RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 14:47:17 EST)
  • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 10:34:28 EST)
  • RE: Odd DNS Traffic (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 17:24:05 EST)
  • RE: Bellsouth clueful? (Sat Mar 22 2003 - 10:31:19 EST)
  • RE: 69/8 revisited (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 20:25:20 EST)
  • RE: Co-lo best practices on IP allocations (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 08:08:06 EST)
  • --NON-Topic-- Advertising on NANOG instead of...... (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 13:55:50 EST)
  • FW: Code red- Returning? (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 13:38:57 EST)
  • RE: Code red- Returning? (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 13:37:45 EST)
  • Code red- Returning? (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 12:50:17 EST)
  • RE: DSL-IP Probes Curiousity.. (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 07:52:32 EST)
  • DSL-IP Probes Curiousity.. (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 17:19:02 EST)
  • RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:59:51 EST)
  • RE: Move all 9-1-1 to 8-5-5 (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 11:20:02 EST)
  • RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 10:44:24 EST)
  • RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 08:43:18 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 23:19:38 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:00:01 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:57:34 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:26:40 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:31:25 EST)
  • RE: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 13:19:06 EST)
• Michael Airhart
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 11:44:28 EST)
• Michael C. Wu
  • Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 20:44:58 EST)
• Michael Hallgren
  • RE: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 16:33:40 EST)
• Michael K. Smith
  • RE: route filtering in large networks (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 23:44:36 EST)
• Michael Lamoureux
  • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 00:28:49 EST)
  • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 13:41:53 EST)
• Michael Lucking
  • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 17:49:55 EST)
• Michael Painter
  • Re: internet.com (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 23:14:22 EST)
  • Re: internet.com (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:45:17 EST)
  • internet.com (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:21:05 EST)
  • Re: Syn Flood (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 00:22:47 EST)
• Michael Whisenant
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 10:05:37 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:26:28 EST)
• Miguel Mata-Cardona
  • opentrasit.net problem? (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:29:38 EST)
• Mikael Abrahamsson
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:09:51 EST)
• Mike Damm
  • RE: [OT: FW: About your using mailer] (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:36:10 EST)
  • OT: FW: About your using mailer (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 12:44:25 EST)
  • RE: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:11:43 EST)
• Mike Lewinski
  • Lock Down (was Re: Syn Flood) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 00:26:51 EST)
• Mike Lyon
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 04:50:22 EST)
• Mike Tancsa
  • Re: aljazeera.net domain owned. (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 17:04:28 EST)
  • Re: DSL-IP Probes Curiousity.. (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 00:53:13 EST)
• Miles Fidelman
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 17:18:41 EST)
• Mohammed Al Sukkar
  • RE: Problems with AT&T (Sat Mar 22 2003 - 11:59:21 EST)
  • RE: Problems with AT&T (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 21:05:25 EST)
  • RE: Code red- Returning? (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 23:35:51 EST)
  • RE: Co-lo best practices on IP allocations (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 23:25:22 EST)
• Nathan E Norman
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:14:36 EST)
• Nathan J. Mehl
  • Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 12:07:46 EST)
  • Remembers, Non-Op Topics Have a Home (was Re: State Super-DMCA Too True) (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 12:05:52 EST)
  • Re: Curing the BIND pain (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 09:24:56 EST)
  • Re: Root server error (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 19:46:43 EST)
• Neil J. McRae
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 03:31:52 EST)
  • Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 (Sat Mar 22 2003 - 03:51:17 EST)
  • Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 04:57:51 EST)
  • Re: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 04:42:32 EST)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 10:02:37 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 04:50:47 EST)
• Niels Bakker
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 13:39:04 EST)
  • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:47:05 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 11:42:03 EST)
• Owen DeLong
  • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 17:07:18 EST)
  • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 17:00:27 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 13:32:09 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:40:58 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:38:23 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 12:58:21 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 12:25:38 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 12:21:56 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 11:48:07 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 20:16:16 EST)
• Pascal Gloor
  • look for contact @Nordnet France (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 11:30:10 EST)
• Patrick
  • Re: internet.com (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 23:01:20 EST)
• Paul Ferguson
  • RE: BGP to doom us all (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 03:48:56 EST)
• Paul Vixie
  • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 08:53:19 EST)
  • summary (Re: how to get people to upgrade?) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 18:55:28 EST)
  • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 16:22:59 EST)
  • how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 10:24:18 EST)
  • Re: I need help finding SAN-FRANCISCO.CA.US Registrar (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 19:18:15 EST)
  • Re: spamcop.net? (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 19:33:55 EST)
  • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:58:22 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 00:29:20 EST)
• Pedro R Marques
  • how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 14:20:45 EST)
• Pete Kruckenberg
  • DNS records for routers (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 14:04:36 EST)
• Pete Templin
  • RE: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 09:53:37 EST)
• Peter E. Fry
  • Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 (Sat Mar 22 2003 - 14:18:26 EST)
  • Re: route filtering in large networks (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 01:06:42 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 19:48:44 EST)
  • Re: Route Supression Problem (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 11:33:25 EST)
• Peter Galbavy
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 03:21:06 EST)
  • Re: Freedom to Tinker: Use a Firewall, Go to Jail (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 10:01:04 EST)
  • Fw: Freedom to Tinker: Use a Firewall, Go to Jail (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:56:56 EST)
  • different use of a backhoe (Mon Mar 24 2003 - 06:28:09 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 12:28:41 EST)
  • Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:05:47 EST)
  • Re: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 04:15:11 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 04:29:04 EST)
  • Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment) (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 10:35:22 EST)
  • Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment) (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 09:05:31 EST)
• Peter Salus
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:27:50 EST)
  • Re: spamcop.net? (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 16:54:41 EST)
• Petri Helenius
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 16:47:22 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 16:08:15 EST)
  • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 17:05:05 EST)
  • Re: good networking (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 03:25:22 EST)
  • Re: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:39:17 EST)
  • Re: OpenSSL (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 12:52:23 EST)
  • Re: OpenSSL (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 10:09:58 EST)
  • Re: Nortel SHASTA (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 14:01:07 EST)
  • Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 09:39:03 EST)
  • Re: DNS records for routers (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 18:21:35 EST)
• Philip Smith
  • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 02:52:58 EST)
• Rafi Sadowsky
  • Re: internet.com (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 23:33:31 EST)
  • Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 14:36:15 EST)
  • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 09:33:15 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 05:03:29 EST)
• Randy Bush
  • Re: route filtering in large networks (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 07:13:10 EST)
  • Re: route filtering in large networks (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 23:51:23 EST)
  • Re: route filtering in large networks (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 23:47:39 EST)
  • gender and nanog (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:48:37 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:34:45 EST)
  • Re: Route Supression Problem (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 09:33:11 EST)
  • Re: Route Supression Problem (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 09:29:36 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:47:29 EST)
  • Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 09:59:30 EST)
• Ray Bellis
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:39:19 EST)
• Richard A Steenbergen
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:46:47 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 05:14:45 EST)
  • Re: Initial network impacts post-US attack 3/19/03 (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 00:55:49 EST)
  • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 01:24:52 EST)
  • Re: att.net domain expired (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 04:55:55 EST)
  • Re: route filtering in large networks (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 22:47:21 EST)
  • Re: cw to att? issue? (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:35:24 EST)
  • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:21:39 EST)
  • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:17:19 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:07:32 EST)
  • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 19:35:36 EST)
  • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 13:52:54 EST)
  • Re: Port 80 Issues (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 01:26:55 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 01:25:17 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:20:17 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:53:22 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:33:20 EST)
  • Re: OT: level3 contact (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 18:52:11 EST)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 14:37:37 EST)
• Richard Irving
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 15:08:08 EST)
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:34:15 EST)
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:31:08 EST)
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:59:02 EST)
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 12:24:08 EST)
  • Re: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement- COPA Enforcement BAN (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 17:17:04 EST)
  • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:30:04 EST)
• Richard Welty
  • Re[2]: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 16:48:20 EST)
  • Re[2]: Verizon mail server on MAPS RSS list (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 16:48:19 EST)
  • Re: Verizon mail server on MAPS RSS list (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 15:59:22 EST)
• Rick Duff
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 15:08:54 EST)
• Rick Ernst
  • 69/8 revisited (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 12:42:46 EST)
• Rob Thomas
  • ASN allocation update (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 11:05:26 EST)
  • Re: route filtering in large networks (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 01:57:00 EST)
  • Re: cw to att? issue? (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 01:42:18 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:46:32 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:20:11 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:03:23 EST)
• Robert A. Hayden
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 10:34:05 EST)
• Robert E. Seastrom
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:43:28 EST)
• Robert M. Enger
  • RE: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 13:49:15 EST)
• Rodney Joffe
  • Re: internet.com (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 23:57:32 EST)
  • Re: Domain oddity - possibly early warning... (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 10:05:58 EST)
  • Domain oddity - possibly early warning... (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 18:35:40 EST)
  • VLAN between PAIX VA and EQUINIX ASHBURN (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:53:12 EST)
• Roland Perry
  • Re: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 09:09:52 EST)
• Ron da Silva
  • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 09:50:34 EST)
  • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 10:41:36 EST)
• Ron Harris
  • RE: Syn Flood (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 23:12:38 EST)
• Roy
  • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:40:17 EST)
• Rubens Kuhl Jr.
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 16:16:46 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 04:25:19 EST)
• Russell Heilling
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:38:48 EST)
• Scott Francis
  • Re: OpenSSL (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 20:18:23 EST)
  • Re: OpenSSL (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 12:34:58 EST)
  • Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 03:28:37 EST)
• Scott Granados
  • Re: 69/8 revisited (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 13:49:06 EST)
  • Re: DSL-IP Probes Curiousity.. (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 00:56:45 EST)
  • Re: cw to att? issue? (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:56:46 EST)
  • Re: cw to att? issue? (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:19:58 EST)
  • cw to att? issue? (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 15:23:43 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:47:16 EST)
  • nntp peering question (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 16:12:02 EST)
• Scott W Brim
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 10:47:04 EST)
• Scott Weeks
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:51:14 EST)
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:44:28 EST)
  • RE: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 13:12:11 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:20:56 EST)
• Sean Donelan
  • Where fiber goes, backhoes soon follow: Camp Doha fiber link (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 14:18:56 EST)
  • Re: OUTAGE: Known Iraq public Internet service (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 03:24:38 EST)
  • Typo's in DNS, Al Jazeera back online (Sat Mar 29 2003 - 22:57:01 EST)
  • OUTAGE: Known Iraq public Internet service (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 18:20:54 EST)
  • Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 16:19:03 EST)
  • Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:44:00 EST)
  • Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:02:36 EST)
  • The backhoes are coming out of hibernation (Boston/New York) (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:45:32 EST)
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 12:55:09 EST)
  • Photographs of Iraqi telecomunication facilities (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 03:24:50 EST)
  • Re: Problems on internet today ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 01:26:20 EST)
  • Re: Iraq Telecom Facility (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 01:24:40 EST)
  • Re: Problems on internet today ? (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 19:43:54 EST)
  • Re: aljazeera.net domain owned. (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 15:33:21 EST)
  • Both Iraqi state provider Uruklink.net name servers offline (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 02:57:23 EST)
  • Re: The weak link? DNS (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 16:04:35 EST)
  • The weak link? DNS (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 04:09:06 EST)
  • Re: Al Jazeera DOSed or just lots of traffic (Tue Mar 25 2003 - 01:17:21 EST)
  • Al Jazeera DOSed or just lots of traffic (Mon Mar 24 2003 - 18:31:55 EST)
  • Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:49:33 EST)
  • Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:03:27 EST)
  • Power outage: San Francisco Multimedia Gulch South of Market (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 14:58:46 EST)
  • Re: Initial network impacts post-US attack 3/19/03 (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 13:39:07 EST)
  • Initial network impacts post-US attack 3/19/03 (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 00:03:13 EST)
  • Re: Problems with AT&T (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 14:28:16 EST)
  • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 01:30:39 EST)
  • Re: DSL-IP Probes Curiousity.. (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 00:30:53 EST)
  • IETF BOF on Network Configuration (netconf) (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:20:39 EST)
  • Re: att.net domain expired (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 08:00:26 EST)
  • Increase in packet loss from the west coast (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 23:00:18 EST)
  • Move all 9-1-1 to 8-5-5 (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 19:51:00 EST)
  • Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:58:02 EST)
  • Re: Port 80 Issues (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 02:20:03 EST)
  • Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:46:18 EST)
  • UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:52:35 EST)
  • Using HINFO (was Re: spamcop.net?) (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 04:13:46 EST)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:35:44 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 00:51:24 EST)
• Sean M.Doran
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 17:13:15 EST)
• Shane Kerr
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 11:53:12 EST)
• Shon Elliott
  • Re: cw to att? issue? (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 16:45:44 EST)
• Simon Brilus
  • Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 06:00:50 EST)
  • Bogon and anti-spoof filters (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 04:48:41 EST)
• Simon Lyall
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 04:04:50 EST)
  • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 16:55:08 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:28:55 EST)
• Simon Waters
  • 69/8 compelling content? (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 05:32:30 EST)
• St. Clair, James
  • RE: BGP to doom us all (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 09:00:55 EST)
• Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 07:17:31 EST)
• Stephen Gill
  • (no subject) (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:32:42 EST)
• Stephen J. Wilcox
  • Re: DNS dDos Attack! (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:39:02 EST)
  • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (Sun Mar 23 2003 - 20:15:10 EST)
  • Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:36:23 EST)
  • Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:26:17 EST)
  • Re: (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 17:50:59 EST)
  • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 16:03:10 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 07:14:12 EST)
  • Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 08:50:01 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 05:56:36 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 05:51:57 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:35:51 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:05:28 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 17:07:12 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:34:29 EST)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:48:35 EST)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:01:12 EST)
• Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:57:23 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 19:29:03 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:32:52 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:24:30 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:30:13 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 17:32:18 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 15:49:26 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 15:50:50 EST)
  • Re: 69/8 revisited (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 16:51:11 EST)
  • Re: route filtering in large networks (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:13:08 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:48:47 EST)
  • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:44:05 EST)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:28:02 EST)
  • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:18:35 EST)
  • Re: scope of the 69/8 problem (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:03:14 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:55:14 EST)
  • Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 12:47:06 EST)
  • Re: spamcop.net? (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 14:14:16 EST)
• Steve Francis
  • NY carrier neutral colo: what a maze... (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 14:36:31 EST)
• Steve Gibbard
  • Re: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:52:11 EST)
  • Re: Co-lo best practices on IP allocations (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 17:20:35 EST)
• Steve Rude
  • RE: OT: level3 contact (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:13:27 EST)
  • OT: level3 contact (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 13:45:45 EST)
• Steven M. Bellovin
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 19:47:25 EST)
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 10:45:22 EST)
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 10:36:15 EST)
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 10:16:00 EST)
  • Re: is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:40:42 EST)
  • Re: OpenSSL (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 12:55:24 EST)
  • Re: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 20:47:41 EST)
• Stewart, William C (Bill), SALES
  • Re: OpenSSL (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 15:52:10 EST)
• Stretch
  • Re: Initial network impacts post-US attack 3/19/03 (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 00:21:41 EST)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:22:42 EST)
• Subhi S Hashwa
  • Re: aljazeera.net domain owned. (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 11:29:41 EST)
• Support Team
  • Odd DNS Traffic (Wed Mar 26 2003 - 16:00:38 EST)
• Susan Harris
  • June NANOG meeting (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 17:55:09 EST)
• Temkin, David
  • RE: level3 contact (Wed Mar 05 2003 - 14:12:28 EST)
• Thomas Kernen
  • Re: cw to att? issue? (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 06:06:18 EST)
• Tim Thorne
  • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 14:29:54 EST)
• Todd A. Blank
  • RE: Gender and other protocol issues (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 23:00:22 EST)
  • RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:32:34 EST)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:02:16 EST)
• todd glassey
  • RE: [RE: State Super-DMCA Too True] (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 21:06:50 EST)
  • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 20:19:30 EST)
  • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 18:07:11 EST)
  • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 16:45:23 EST)
  • RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 15:44:11 EST)
  • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 12:50:28 EST)
  • RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 12:40:16 EST)
  • RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 10:05:56 EST)
  • RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 21:20:13 EST)
  • RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 14:04:07 EST)
• Todd Mitchell - lists
  • RE: burst.net DDoS? (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 15:59:11 EST)
  • RE: Notebooks /w a serial port? (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:32:24 EST)
• Tomas Daniska
  • is this true or... ? (Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:09:23 EST)
  • RE: Initial network impacts post-US attack 3/19/03 (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 02:50:34 EST)
• Tony Rall
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 15:57:31 EST)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 02:42:42 EST)
• Truman, Michelle, SALES
  • RE: Problems with AT&T (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 12:15:53 EST)
  • RE: Problems with AT&T (Fri Mar 21 2003 - 02:01:05 EST)
  • RE: Problems with AT&T (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 20:56:57 EST)
  • RE: Problems with AT&T (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 15:39:10 EST)
• Vadim Antonov
  • Re: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 23:02:52 EST)
  • Re: Route Supression Problem (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 14:04:14 EST)
  • Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 05:26:35 EST)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 01:49:02 EST)
• Vinny Abello
  • Re: Verizon mail server on MAPS RSS list (Thu Mar 27 2003 - 16:13:43 EST)
• Vivien M.
  • RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 21:50:55 EST)
  • RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:58:50 EST)
  • RE: Move all 9-1-1 to 8-5-5 (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 00:09:45 EST)
• Warren Kumari
  • RE: different use of a backhoe (Mon Mar 24 2003 - 12:56:20 EST)
• Wayne Bogan
  • Alcatel Router experience, information (Sat Mar 01 2003 - 08:28:20 EST)
• Will Yardley
  • clued-in AOL postmaster? (Mon Mar 24 2003 - 18:51:09 EST)
  • Re: Getting a Host Record (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:30:35 EST)
  • Re: spamcop.net? (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 21:50:31 EST)
• William Allen Simpson
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True (Sun Mar 30 2003 - 09:39:26 EST)
  • State Super-DMCA Too True (Sat Mar 29 2003 - 15:53:32 EST)
  • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 12:15:10 EST)
  • [Fwd: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their securitysystem] (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 21:32:09 EST)
  • Re: Have address space? You too can make policy. (Sun Mar 02 2003 - 16:03:42 EST)
• William B. Norton
  • Re: (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 19:09:09 EST)
• wireworks
  • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:46:30 EST)

Last message date: Mon Mar 31 2003 - 23:59:04 EST
Archived on: Thu Dec 09 2004 - 16:07:05 EST

980 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
About this archive
Other mail archives