Nanog 0208
By Date

Most recent messages
1096 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
About this archive
Other mail archives

Starting: Thu Aug 01 2002 - 04:11:57 EDT
Ending: Sat Aug 31 2002 - 12:45:01 EDT

• FCC on UUNET .. Robert Mathews (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 04:10:32 EDT)
• OpenSSH Trojan.. Len Rose (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 04:13:39 EDT)
• Re: Identifying DoS sources quickly (was: Bogon list or Dshield.org type list) Rafi Sadowsky (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 09:35:03 EDT)
• RE: OpenSSH Trojan=tisk tisk jnull (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 11:24:50 EDT)
• Re: OpenSSH Trojan=tisk tisk Gerardo A. Gregory (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 11:33:51 EDT)
• Re: OpenSSH Trojan=tisk tisk Gerardo A. Gregory (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 11:47:32 EDT)
• RE: OpenSSH Trojan=tisk tisk Mike Lewinski (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 11:58:19 EDT)
• Re: OpenSSH Trojan=tisk tisk Jeffrey Meltzer (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 12:00:15 EDT)
• Re: OpenSSH Trojan=tisk tisk Kevin Loch (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 12:01:37 EDT)
• Re: OpenSSH Trojan=tisk tisk (no name) (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 12:01:05 EDT)
• RE:tisk tisk--retract jnull (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 12:19:26 EDT)
• Re: OpenSSH Trojan=tisk tisk Christopher L. Morrow (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 12:31:57 EDT)
• Re: Identifying DoS sources quickly (was: Bogon list or Dshield.org type list) Jesper Skriver (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 12:49:54 EDT)
• Re: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Stephen Stuart (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 13:03:12 EDT)
• Re: RE:tisk tisk--retract Mike Forrester (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 13:03:33 EDT)
• Re: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Stephen Stuart (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 13:09:30 EDT)
• Bonding ATM circuits for DSL Christopher J. Wolff (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 16:46:22 EDT)
• RE: Bonding ATM circuits for DSL Christopher J. Wolff (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 16:50:40 EDT)
• Pacific Bell Frame Cloud problem in the San Francisco Area Ulf Zimmermann (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 16:54:48 EDT)
• RE: Bonding ATM circuits for DSL Martin, Christian (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 17:02:27 EDT)
• Re: OpenSSH Trojan=tisk tisk Brad Knowles (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 18:43:36 EDT)
• Re: Pacific Bell Frame Cloud problem in the San Francisco Area Ulf Zimmermann (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 19:10:40 EDT)
• Re: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Peter van Dijk (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 19:52:09 EDT)
• Re: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Scott Granados (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 23:12:04 EDT)
• ATT Fire in Philly? blitz (Fri Aug 02 2002 - 05:53:56 EDT)
• cw outage? Dan Hollis (Fri Aug 02 2002 - 16:36:23 EDT)
• Re: cw outage? Pawlukiewicz Jane (Fri Aug 02 2002 - 16:39:08 EDT)
• cw Scott Granados (Fri Aug 02 2002 - 16:48:02 EDT)
• Re: cw outage? Mike Lewinski (Fri Aug 02 2002 - 16:53:29 EDT)
• Re: cw outage? Rich Fulton (Fri Aug 02 2002 - 16:56:13 EDT)
• RE: cw outage? Stanley, Jon (Fri Aug 02 2002 - 17:04:14 EDT)
• RE: cw outage? Dan Hollis (Fri Aug 02 2002 - 17:09:03 EDT)
• RE: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Lane Patterson (Fri Aug 02 2002 - 17:55:06 EDT)
• The Cidr Report CIDR Report (Sat Aug 03 2002 - 02:00:02 EDT)
• Re: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Nipper, Arnold (Sat Aug 03 2002 - 02:27:54 EDT)
• Re: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Stephen Stuart (Sat Aug 03 2002 - 02:48:50 EDT)
• Cisco fixup for SMTP (Mail Guard) Shaun Bryant (Sat Aug 03 2002 - 13:42:49 EDT)
• If you have nothing to hide Sean Donelan (Sat Aug 03 2002 - 15:13:37 EDT)
• Re: Cisco fixup for SMTP (Mail Guard) Brad Knowles (Sat Aug 03 2002 - 15:46:30 EDT)
• Re: Cisco fixup for SMTP (Mail Guard) Stephen Sprunk (Sun Aug 04 2002 - 00:47:53 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide Paul Vixie (Sun Aug 04 2002 - 02:55:16 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide Sean Donelan (Sun Aug 04 2002 - 06:31:21 EDT)
• NSPs filter? Abdullah Bin Hamad - Arabian (Sun Aug 04 2002 - 07:41:08 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? (no name) (Sun Aug 04 2002 - 10:37:12 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? Christopher L. Morrow (Sun Aug 04 2002 - 12:08:31 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide Dave Crocker (Sun Aug 04 2002 - 12:20:34 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide Sean Donelan (Sun Aug 04 2002 - 20:27:56 EDT)
• Contacting Richard Clarke, Special Advisor to the President for Cyberspace Security Sean Donelan (Sun Aug 04 2002 - 21:35:44 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? Chris Woodfield (Sun Aug 04 2002 - 23:19:35 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? (no name) (Sun Aug 04 2002 - 23:23:14 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? Stephen Stuart (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 00:15:26 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? (no name) (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 01:18:22 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? Stephen Stuart (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 01:52:17 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide Dave Crocker (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 02:13:00 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide Simon Waters (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 06:02:41 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide fingers (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 06:12:33 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide (no name) (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 07:37:31 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide Len Rose (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 09:03:03 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? Chris Woodfield (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 09:05:28 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide (no email) (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:51:45 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide Len Rose (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 11:03:44 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? Jared Mauch (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 11:06:50 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? Richard A Steenbergen (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 11:18:31 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide Stephen Sprunk (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 11:11:25 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide (no name) (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 11:55:28 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide (no email) (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 12:00:20 EDT)
• RE: NSPs filter? Barry Raveendran Greene (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 11:59:04 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? (no email) (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 12:03:18 EDT)
• Re[2]: If you have nothing to hide Richard Welty (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 12:00:54 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide (no email) (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 12:07:46 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? Richard A Steenbergen (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 12:14:49 EDT)
• C&W Direction James Ferris (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 12:19:55 EDT)
• Verizon experiencing routing issues? Darrell Carley (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 12:19:52 EDT)
• Re: Verizon experiencing routing issues? Mark Kent (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 12:28:06 EDT)
• Re: Verizon experiencing routing issues? David Lesher (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 12:28:10 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? Richard A Steenbergen (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 12:39:08 EDT)
• Re: Verizon experiencing routing issues? Darrell Carley (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 12:42:58 EDT)
• Re: Verizon experiencing routing issues? Richard A Steenbergen (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 12:45:02 EDT)
• Re: Verizon experiencing routing issues? Tony Tauber (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 13:21:37 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide Jeffrey Haas (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 13:48:16 EDT)
• RE: NSPs filter? Hank Nussbacher (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 14:46:56 EDT)
• Re: Re[2]: If you have nothing to hide Miquel van Smoorenburg (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 14:30:06 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? Chris Woodfield (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 14:30:12 EDT)
• BBC-2 Story on Sept.11 Alan Sawyer (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 14:41:59 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide Gerardo A. Gregory (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 14:50:24 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide Scott Weeks (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 15:57:46 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? Jared Mauch (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 16:05:14 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide Eric Osborne (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 16:26:39 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? John M. Brown (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 18:09:43 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? John M. Brown (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 18:11:25 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? John M. Brown (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 18:17:19 EDT)
• Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 18:41:22 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide (no email) (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 18:46:59 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide (no email) (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 18:52:21 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Richard A Steenbergen (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 18:53:06 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Simon Lockhart (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 18:54:20 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 18:45:05 EDT)
• RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 19:17:43 EDT)
• Re[4]: If you have nothing to hide Richard Welty (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 19:23:19 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes (no name) (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 19:51:48 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes John M. Brown (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 20:12:07 EDT)
• RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 21:00:55 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? Scott Granados (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 22:01:26 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes jnull (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 22:23:47 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide Eric Osborne (Mon Aug 05 2002 - 23:49:20 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes (no name) (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 01:47:33 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes John M. Brown (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 01:51:21 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide Henry Yen (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 02:30:20 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Omachonu Ogali (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 03:59:50 EDT)
• Re: BBC-2 Story on Sept.11 cw (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 04:28:52 EDT)
• Re: BBC-2 Story on Sept.11 Rob Pickering (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 06:54:26 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Ratul Mahajan (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 07:01:46 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Omachonu Ogali (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 11:53:35 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes E.B. Dreger (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 12:39:27 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes (no name) (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 12:45:15 EDT)
• U.S. monitoring Internet attacks (fwd) Christopher X. Candreva (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 13:03:43 EDT)
• RE: U.S. monitoring Internet attacks (fwd) Al Rowland (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 13:27:56 EDT)
• RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 13:29:58 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Jared Mauch (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 13:38:29 EDT)
• RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 13:52:44 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes (no name) (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 13:57:14 EDT)
• RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes E.B. Dreger (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 13:59:01 EDT)
• RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 14:07:13 EDT)
• RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 14:12:41 EDT)
• RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Dominic J. Eidson (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 14:18:23 EDT)
• RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes E.B. Dreger (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 14:38:19 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Omachonu Ogali (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 14:41:55 EDT)
• RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 14:44:10 EDT)
• RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Derek Samford (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 14:50:56 EDT)
• RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 14:59:15 EDT)
• Re: U.S. monitoring Internet attacks (fwd) Len Rose (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 15:01:44 EDT)
• NYT: Phone Network Is Vulnerable, Report Finds Sean Donelan (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 15:07:12 EDT)
• Re: GBLX router upgrade breaks bgp sessions (no email) (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 15:11:21 EDT)
• Re: NYT: Phone Network Is Vulnerable, Report Finds Sean Donelan (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 15:27:54 EDT)
• Re: NYT: Phone Network Is Vulnerable, Report Finds William Warren (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 15:29:11 EDT)
• Re: NYT: Phone Network Is Vulnerable, Report Finds Pawlukiewicz Jane (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 15:52:33 EDT)
• RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes E.B. Dreger (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 15:54:09 EDT)
• RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Daniel Senie (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 15:56:32 EDT)
• Re: GBLX router upgrade breaks bgp sessions nanog (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 16:15:18 EDT)
• RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Jeff S Wheeler (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 16:12:22 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Omachonu Ogali (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 16:14:34 EDT)
• RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Derek Samford (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 16:21:13 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Simon Lockhart (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 16:42:27 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes (no name) (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 16:41:44 EDT)
• Re: U.S. monitoring Internet attacks / RFF Reply Richard Forno (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 16:48:23 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Adam Rothschild (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 17:00:29 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Richard A Steenbergen (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 17:00:46 EDT)
• Re: U.S. monitoring Internet attacks / RFF Reply blitz (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 17:03:41 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Greg Maxwell (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 17:37:47 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes (no email) (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 17:44:16 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Omachonu Ogali (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 18:29:48 EDT)
• Re: NYT: Phone Network Is Vulnerable, Report Finds Martin Hannigan (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 18:39:15 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes (no name) (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 18:51:37 EDT)
• Re: NYT: Phone Network Is Vulnerable, Report Finds (fwd) David Lesher (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 18:53:44 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Brad Knowles (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 18:01:48 EDT)
• RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Brad Knowles (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 18:05:44 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes David Conrad (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 19:28:43 EDT)
• Re: NYT: Phone Network Is Vulnerable, Report Finds (fwd) Martin Hannigan (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 19:55:24 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Brad Knowles (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 20:30:03 EDT)
• Any issues with AADS Chicago NAP? Matthew Sweet (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 20:33:03 EDT)
• Re: U.S. monitoring Internet attacks / RFF Reply Scott Granados (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 21:57:38 EDT)
• Re: NYT: Phone Network Is Vulnerable, Report Finds (fwd) Scott Granados (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 22:01:31 EDT)
• Re: NYT: Phone Network Is Vulnerable, Report Finds (fwd) Martin Hannigan (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 22:19:55 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide Sean Donelan (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 22:45:29 EDT)
• Net attacks on CNN Martin Hannigan (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 23:36:22 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes John M. Brown (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 23:52:34 EDT)
• RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Paul Vixie (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 00:19:01 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Alex Rubenstein (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 00:29:29 EDT)
• Re: Net attacks on CNN Sean Donelan (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 00:38:09 EDT)
• Re: DNS monitoring changes bert hubert (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 08:29:24 EDT)
• e-mail problems William Warren (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 10:04:20 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Chris Woodfield (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 10:24:31 EDT)
• 69/8 allocated to ARIN Rob Thomas (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 10:49:47 EDT)
• RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Derek Samford (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 10:48:00 EDT)
• Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes (no name) (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 11:17:10 EDT)
• DDoS FUD Omachonu Ogali (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 11:40:36 EDT)
• Re: e-mail problems (no email) (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 12:38:45 EDT)
• Re: e-mail problems William Warren (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 14:55:27 EDT)
• RE: e-mail problems Derek Samford (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 14:59:38 EDT)
• my sig William Warren (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 15:48:27 EDT)
• RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 15:54:45 EDT)
• Re: my sig Dominic J. Eidson (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 16:05:38 EDT)
• Re: my sig brett watson (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 16:09:10 EDT)
• Re: my sig David Klindt (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 16:13:17 EDT)
• Re: my sig Christian Liendo (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 16:29:10 EDT)
• Re: my sig Omachonu Ogali (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 16:39:33 EDT)
• Re: Re: NSPs filter? (no name) (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 16:48:20 EDT)
• RE: my sig Al Rowland (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 17:02:13 EDT)
• Re: my sig (no name) (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 17:01:17 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide Steven M. Bellovin (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 14:28:58 EDT)
• Re: my sig jnull (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 17:09:11 EDT)
• Re: my sig Omachonu Ogali (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 17:11:26 EDT)
• RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes (no name) (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 17:12:44 EDT)
• Re[2]: my sig Richard Welty (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 17:20:38 EDT)
• "... I don't think that means what he thinks it means..." (no name) (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 17:22:48 EDT)
• Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Brad Knowles (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 17:08:26 EDT)
• Re: e-mail problems Scott Granados (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 18:25:02 EDT)
• [SOT] RIP: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra (fwd) Alif The Terrible (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 18:25:17 EDT)
• Re: my sig Scott Granados (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 18:26:45 EDT)
• signature William Warren (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 18:28:14 EDT)
• Re: my sig Scott Granados (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 18:28:33 EDT)
• Re: my sig Scott Granados (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 18:40:00 EDT)
• Re: signature Scott Granados (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 18:46:45 EDT)
• Re: signature Brad Knowles (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 18:51:18 EDT)
• Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? William B. Norton (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 19:36:27 EDT)
• operational context? Re: signature Jim Mercer (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 20:25:30 EDT)
• Re: routing table size k claffy (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 20:32:34 EDT)
• Re: operational context? Re: signature Scott Granados (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 20:42:52 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? Stephen Stuart (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 21:07:37 EDT)
• Re: routing table size David G. Andersen (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 21:10:45 EDT)
• Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Paul Vixie (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 21:23:48 EDT)
• Re: RFC 2870's applicability Ralph Doncaster (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 21:49:43 EDT)
• (no subject) (no name) (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:11:36 EDT)
• Re: RFC 2870's applicability Paul Vixie (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:26:03 EDT)
• Network inventory and configuration tracking tools Sean Donelan (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 23:09:28 EDT)
• Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Patrick (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 23:50:27 EDT)
• ticket tracking Scott Granados (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 00:01:41 EDT)
• Re: your mail Brian Wallingford (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 00:13:22 EDT)
• Re: Network inventory and configuration tracking tools Hugh Irvine (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 01:17:31 EDT)
• Re: signature Martin Hannigan (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 02:18:23 EDT)
• Re: Network inventory and configuration tracking tools jnull (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 03:03:13 EDT)
• Re: RFC 2870's applicability John M. Brown (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 03:45:03 EDT)
• NANOG, its decline in s/n John M. Brown (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 04:01:47 EDT)
• Re: ticket tracking Avleen Vig (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 04:22:06 EDT)
• Re: ticket tracking gg (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 04:27:05 EDT)
• Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n Brian Wallingford (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 04:22:45 EDT)
• Re: ticket tracking (off-topic reply) gg (Mon Jul 08 2002 - 05:22:32 EDT)
• Re: ticket tracking (off-topic reply) Avleen Vig (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 06:37:17 EDT)
• Re: ticket tracking Niels Bakker (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 07:32:06 EDT)
• Re: ticket tracking Mike Tancsa (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 08:10:34 EDT)
• RE: Network inventory and configuration tracking tools Rishi Singh (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 10:22:51 EDT)
• Re: ticket tracking Andy Dills (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 10:31:54 EDT)
• Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n David Diaz (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 10:35:12 EDT)
• RE: NANOG, its decline in s/n Derek Samford (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 10:58:45 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? William B. Norton (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 11:11:45 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Alex Rubenstein (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 11:22:52 EDT)
• RE: ticket tracking Daniel Golding (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 11:28:11 EDT)
• RE: ticket tracking Derek Samford (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 11:28:59 EDT)
• Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n Rob Healey (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 11:42:38 EDT)
• BGP, How-tos, tips and tricks, training info. (no name) (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 11:59:43 EDT)
• Re: ticket tracking (off-topic reply) (no name) (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 11:49:53 EDT)
• Re: my sig (no name) (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 11:52:11 EDT)
• Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n David Diaz (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 11:59:17 EDT)
• Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n Randy Bush (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 12:03:14 EDT)
• Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n Andy Dills (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 12:07:08 EDT)
• Fw: ticket tracking Gerardo A. Gregory (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 12:11:54 EDT)
• Re: routing table size David G. Andersen (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 12:12:38 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? (no name) (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 12:16:29 EDT)
• Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n (no name) (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 12:19:15 EDT)
• RE: BGP, How-tos, tips and tricks, training info. Blake Fithen (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 12:18:40 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Alex Rubenstein (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 12:37:30 EDT)
• RE: NANOG, its decline in s/n Derek Samford (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 12:48:21 EDT)
• RE: NANOG, its decline in s/n Andy Dills (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 13:18:15 EDT)
• RE: BGP, How-tos, tips and tricks, training info. Charles Sprickman (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 13:29:58 EDT)
• RE: NANOG, its decline in s/n Derek Samford (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 13:27:35 EDT)
• Re: your mail Ukyo Kuonji (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 13:36:02 EDT)
• Verizon DSL Contact Erich Kuehn (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 13:44:14 EDT)
• RE: Network inventory and configuration tracking tools Internet Guy (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 13:56:13 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? (no name) (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 14:12:05 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Mikael Abrahamsson (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 14:49:14 EDT)
• Re: BGP, How-tos, tips and tricks, training info. Jeffrey Meltzer (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 14:54:45 EDT)
• well the rt's have it:) Scott Granados (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 15:22:13 EDT)
• Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n Scott Granados (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 15:25:44 EDT)
• Re: your mail Scott Granados (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 17:42:37 EDT)
• Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n Scott Granados (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 17:32:14 EDT)
• Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n (no name) (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 17:45:29 EDT)
• Anyone heard of anything at OC24? Ryan Mooney (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 17:56:24 EDT)
• [: Fwd: Re: If you have nothing to hide] Todd MacDermid (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 18:14:22 EDT)
• Re: your mail Charles Sprickman (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 20:54:38 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? David Schwartz (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 20:57:35 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? Stephen Stuart (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 21:45:17 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide (no email) (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 23:51:28 EDT)
• BGP evaluation Sathya Perla (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 01:33:03 EDT)
• Re: BGP evaluation senthil ayyasamy (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 01:55:02 EDT)
• Re: your mail JC Dill (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 02:02:30 EDT)
• 59% of dweebs suffer from 'False Authority Syndrome (Re: If you have nothing to hide) Len Rose (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 05:42:32 EDT)
• Re: If you have nothing to hide gg (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 09:06:10 EDT)
• Re: your mail Chris Adams (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 09:22:58 EDT)
• Re: Network inventory and configuration tracking tools Streiner, Justin (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 09:40:18 EDT)
• Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Brad Knowles (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 19:14:32 EDT)
• Re: Re: Network inventory and configuration tracking tools Frank Coluccio (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 10:32:06 EDT)
• Re: your mail Pawlukiewicz Jane (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 11:17:40 EDT)
• Re: your mail Ukyo Kuonji (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 11:27:25 EDT)
• Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Stephen Sprunk (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 11:33:47 EDT)
• Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Randy Bush (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 11:42:30 EDT)
• Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Paul Vixie (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 11:48:00 EDT)
• Re: your mail Joel Baker (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 13:56:17 EDT)
• Re: your mail Alif The Terrible (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 16:02:52 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Nenad Trifunovic (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 16:01:48 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Bill Woodcock (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 16:13:04 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? William B. Norton (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 16:42:02 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Nenad Trifunovic (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 17:16:48 EDT)
• Re: your mail Martin Hannigan (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 17:16:15 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Mikael Abrahamsson (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 17:39:11 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Petri Helenius (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 18:06:36 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Mike Leber (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 18:16:55 EDT)
• endpoint liveness (RE: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense an ymore?) Lane Patterson (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 18:22:00 EDT)
• Fwd: WorldCom Fraud News: Man these thieves just don't quit.. blitz (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 18:53:46 EDT)
• Re: your mail blitz (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 19:16:26 EDT)
• Re: your mail mike harrison (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 20:41:42 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Steve Feldman (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 22:24:35 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Paul Vixie (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 22:32:11 EDT)
• The Cidr Report CIDR Report (Sat Aug 10 2002 - 02:00:02 EDT)
• laissez-faire DNS jnull (Sat Aug 10 2002 - 04:03:07 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Petri Helenius (Sat Aug 10 2002 - 04:19:11 EDT)
• Re: endpoint liveness (RE: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense an ymore?) Vadim Antonov (Sat Aug 10 2002 - 05:13:33 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Paul Vixie (Sat Aug 10 2002 - 05:21:21 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Mikael Abrahamsson (Sat Aug 10 2002 - 07:24:28 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Mike Hughes (Sat Aug 10 2002 - 08:24:58 EDT)
• Re: endpoint liveness (RE: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense an ymore?) Mike Hughes (Sat Aug 10 2002 - 08:52:09 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? (no name) (Sat Aug 10 2002 - 08:52:21 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Robert E. Seastrom (Sat Aug 10 2002 - 10:24:54 EDT)
• Re: endpoint liveness (RE: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sensean ymore?) Petri Helenius (Sat Aug 10 2002 - 11:02:40 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Petri Helenius (Sat Aug 10 2002 - 11:09:05 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Richard A Steenbergen (Sat Aug 10 2002 - 11:20:44 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Jared Mauch (Sat Aug 10 2002 - 11:41:52 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Vadim Antonov (Sat Aug 10 2002 - 16:59:12 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Alex Rubenstein (Sat Aug 10 2002 - 17:38:14 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Alex Rubenstein (Sat Aug 10 2002 - 17:42:32 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Alex Rubenstein (Sat Aug 10 2002 - 17:49:21 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Richard A Steenbergen (Sat Aug 10 2002 - 17:55:17 EDT)
• Responses and update.. Scott Walker (Sun Aug 11 2002 - 05:49:42 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? David Diaz (Sun Aug 11 2002 - 18:26:18 EDT)
• Microslosh vision of the future blitz (Sun Aug 11 2002 - 18:50:37 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future Kevin Oberman (Sun Aug 11 2002 - 19:10:23 EDT)
• damping Randy Bush (Sun Aug 11 2002 - 19:16:14 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Paul Vixie (Sun Aug 11 2002 - 19:24:21 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future gg (Sun Aug 11 2002 - 19:51:53 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future Alif The Terrible (Sun Aug 11 2002 - 19:59:40 EDT)
• Re: endpoint liveness (RE: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense an ymore?) Jesper Skriver (Sun Aug 11 2002 - 21:01:23 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future David Schwartz (Sun Aug 11 2002 - 21:17:16 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future Vadim Antonov (Sun Aug 11 2002 - 21:43:17 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future David Schwartz (Sun Aug 11 2002 - 22:40:45 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future blitz (Sun Aug 11 2002 - 23:38:46 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future blitz (Sun Aug 11 2002 - 23:43:53 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future blitz (Sun Aug 11 2002 - 23:45:15 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future blitz (Sun Aug 11 2002 - 23:47:01 EDT)
• Re: endpoint liveness (RE: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense an ymore?) Petri Helenius (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 02:33:27 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future David Howe (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 04:59:45 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future William Warren (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 09:38:47 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future William Warren (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 09:41:29 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Stephen Sprunk (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 09:31:04 EDT)
• Re: endpoint liveness (RE: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense an ymore?) Stephen Sprunk (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 09:44:53 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future Stephen Sprunk (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 09:49:48 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Stephen Sprunk (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 09:39:00 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future Gerardo A. Gregory (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 11:10:56 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 11:18:20 EDT)
• Re: your mail JC Dill (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 11:56:04 EDT)
• gentlemen, stop your engines Paul Vixie (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 12:05:05 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future William Warren (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 12:23:05 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future David Howe (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 12:30:45 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future Gregory Hicks (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 12:35:12 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future Jim Segrave (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 12:39:56 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Nenad Trifunovic (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 12:39:49 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future Paul Vixie (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 12:43:55 EDT)
• $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Sean Donelan (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 12:44:59 EDT)
• Cisco VPN Client Multiple Vulnerabilities blitz (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 13:47:45 EDT)
• apologies to the list William Warren (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 14:24:02 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future Brad Knowles (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 16:44:51 EDT)
• Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Brad Knowles (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 16:54:03 EDT)
• FBI.GOV forgot to pay their DNS bill? Sean Donelan (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 18:26:24 EDT)
• RE: FBI.GOV forgot to pay their DNS bill? Karyn Ulriksen (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 18:32:54 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future Brad Knowles (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 16:47:31 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future gg (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 19:04:28 EDT)
• Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon gg (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 19:21:30 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future Karsten W. Rohrbach (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 20:16:23 EDT)
• RE: FBI.GOV forgot to pay their DNS bill? Sean Donelan (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 20:22:15 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future blitz (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 21:25:52 EDT)
• Re: FBI.GOV forgot to pay their DNS bill? blitz (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 21:27:11 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future Alif The Terrible (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 22:03:32 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future Eric A. Hall (Tue Aug 13 2002 - 09:54:26 EDT)
• Palm OS SNMP client... need some input Brian Smith (Tue Aug 13 2002 - 11:16:14 EDT)
• Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Sean Donelan (Tue Aug 13 2002 - 12:38:10 EDT)
• Routing Protocol Security Jeff Doyle (Tue Aug 13 2002 - 13:34:19 EDT)
• Re: Routing Protocol Security Danny McPherson (Tue Aug 13 2002 - 14:42:10 EDT)
• Re: AS path fugliness? Michael Lewinski (Tue Aug 13 2002 - 16:18:58 EDT)
• Re: Routing Protocol Security senthil ayyasamy (Tue Aug 13 2002 - 16:55:50 EDT)
• Re: Routing Protocol Security (no name) (Mon Aug 12 2002 - 18:13:13 EDT)
• Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Brad Knowles (Tue Aug 13 2002 - 16:19:30 EDT)
• Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Brad Knowles (Tue Aug 13 2002 - 16:26:29 EDT)
• RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Blake Fithen (Tue Aug 13 2002 - 18:13:02 EDT)
• RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Brad Knowles (Tue Aug 13 2002 - 18:59:26 EDT)
• Re: Routing Protocol Security batz (Tue Aug 13 2002 - 19:43:52 EDT)
• RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Vadim Antonov (Tue Aug 13 2002 - 19:54:34 EDT)
• [apops] The Cidr Report CIDR Report (Sat Aug 10 2002 - 02:00:02 EDT)
• Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Doug Barton (Tue Aug 13 2002 - 21:02:01 EDT)
• Re: Routing Protocol Security Hank Nussbacher (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 00:19:03 EDT)
• disa hostmaster (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 09:47:23 EDT)
• RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Al Rowland (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 11:31:15 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future Curtis Maurand (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 11:33:02 EDT)
• Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon David Lesher (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 11:35:09 EDT)
• Re: NSPs filter? Måns Nilsson (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 11:56:37 EDT)
• Best Current Practices for Routing Protocol Security Sean Donelan (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 13:23:01 EDT)
• E Djikstra Paases Away Martin, Christian (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 13:42:48 EDT)
• Re: Best Current Practices for Routing Protocol Security John Kristoff (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 14:44:26 EDT)
• Re: Best Current Practices for Routing Protocol Security (no name) (Tue Aug 13 2002 - 16:11:26 EDT)
• Re: Best Current Practices for Routing Protocol Security Stephen J. Wilcox (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 15:18:58 EDT)
• RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Scott Granados (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 16:09:18 EDT)
• RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Daniel Golding (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 16:54:20 EDT)
• Re: Microslosh vision of the future Karsten W. Rohrbach (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 18:09:56 EDT)
• Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Brad Knowles (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 18:44:08 EDT)
• RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Brad Knowles (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 18:52:06 EDT)
• Internet outage reporting databases (was Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon) Sean Donelan (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 20:29:23 EDT)
• Re: Internet outage reporting databases (was Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon) Aaron Hopkins (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 21:30:19 EDT)
• RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Scott Granados (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 22:10:14 EDT)
• Re: Internet outage reporting databases (was Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon) Scott Granados (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 22:15:40 EDT)
• Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon David Lesher (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 22:37:59 EDT)
• Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Scott Granados (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 23:36:01 EDT)
• Re: Internet outage reporting databases (was Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon) Avleen Vig (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 02:22:56 EDT)
• RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Daniel Golding (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 09:52:04 EDT)
• kudo's to netops security people John M. Brown (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 10:28:01 EDT)
• Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon David Lesher (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 10:20:10 EDT)
• Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Gerald (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 10:42:46 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? William B. Norton (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 11:04:18 EDT)
• LISA: sysadmin conference, take 16. Gerald (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 12:37:05 EDT)
• Re: kudo's to netops security people blitz (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 14:40:02 EDT)
• ALGX problems? Stanley, Jon (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 16:00:19 EDT)
• Re: ALGX problems? Chris Parker (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 16:27:23 EDT)
• Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? William B. Norton (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 17:47:31 EDT)
• Re: ALGX problems? German Martinez (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 18:18:48 EDT)
• RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon David Schwartz (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 18:43:44 EDT)
• wcg.com dead? Dan Hollis (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 18:49:19 EDT)
• Re: wcg.com dead? Richard A Steenbergen (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 19:22:53 EDT)
• RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Brad Knowles (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 15:58:20 EDT)
• Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Brad Knowles (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 16:00:33 EDT)
• Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Brad Knowles (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 16:02:54 EDT)
• Re: LISA: sysadmin conference, take 16. Brad Knowles (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 16:18:37 EDT)
• RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Brad Knowles (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 16:08:07 EDT)
• OT: Seeking John {Johnson, Villasenor, Todd} Jamie Norwood (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 19:27:43 EDT)
• Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP (WAS Re: ALGX problems?) Joe Wood (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 20:15:04 EDT)
• Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Niels Bakker (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 20:26:41 EDT)
• Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Joe Wood (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 20:38:07 EDT)
• Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP (WAS Re: ALGX problems?) Richard A Steenbergen (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 21:00:42 EDT)
• Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Niels Bakker (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 21:01:16 EDT)
• Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Peter E. Fry (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 21:08:11 EDT)
• Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP (WAS Re: ALGX problems?) Joe Wood (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 21:14:39 EDT)
• Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Joe Wood (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 21:22:01 EDT)
• Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP (WAS Re: ALGX problems?) Mark Kent (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 21:26:55 EDT)
• Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Joe Wood (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 21:27:47 EDT)
• Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Niels Bakker (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 21:30:24 EDT)
• Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Niels Bakker (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 21:32:00 EDT)
• Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP (WAS Re: ALGX problems?) Joe Wood (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 21:33:01 EDT)
• Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Jared Mauch (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 23:12:00 EDT)
• Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Richard A Steenbergen (Thu Aug 15 2002 - 23:41:17 EDT)
• Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Joe Wood (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 00:09:15 EDT)
• Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Jared Mauch (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 00:09:19 EDT)
• HPOV, Ciscoworks Blake Fithen (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 00:45:08 EDT)
• Donkey Balls Nathan (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 01:04:13 EDT)
• Re: Donkey Balls Nathan (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 02:20:54 EDT)
• Qwest Outage? James Ferris (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 03:23:56 EDT)
• Re: Qwest Outage? Peter van Dijk (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 03:26:52 EDT)
• Re: Qwest Outage? James Ferris (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 03:56:09 EDT)
• Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Leo Bicknell (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 09:27:34 EDT)
• Echo Martin Hannigan (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 12:38:26 EDT)
• Re: Echo Jeff Wasilko (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 12:49:59 EDT)
• Re: Echo Martin Hepworth (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 12:45:48 EDT)
• Re: Echo Martin Hannigan (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 12:53:31 EDT)
• Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Chris Woodfield (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 12:58:41 EDT)
• Telus outage in Toronto, Ont Canada (AS852) ? Mike Tancsa (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 13:33:13 EDT)
• Re: Echo Brad Knowles (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 13:48:10 EDT)
• Maybe just slightly operational Palladium information Kevin Oberman (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 14:13:02 EDT)
• Re: Maybe just slightly operational Palladium information blitz (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 14:42:27 EDT)
• an itty bitty survey... Eliot Lear (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 14:57:23 EDT)
• Re: an itty bitty survey... mike harrison (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 15:33:49 EDT)
• Re: Echo Karsten W. Rohrbach (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 15:43:08 EDT)
• Re: Telus outage in Toronto, Ont Canada (AS852) ? batz (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 15:33:23 EDT)
• Re: Telus outage in Toronto, Ont Canada (AS852) ? Mike Tancsa (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 15:51:02 EDT)
• Re: Echo Brad Knowles (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 16:27:08 EDT)
• Re: Echo Martin Hannigan (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 16:33:53 EDT)
• Re: Echo Brad Knowles (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 16:37:52 EDT)
• Re: Echo Brad Knowles (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 17:46:51 EDT)
• Re: Echo Karsten W. Rohrbach (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 21:48:45 EDT)
• Re: Echo Karsten W. Rohrbach (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 21:55:17 EDT)
• Major Labels v. Backbones John Ferriby (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 22:03:37 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Richard A Steenbergen (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 22:58:32 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones blitz (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 23:28:13 EDT)
• Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Sean Donelan (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 00:18:39 EDT)
• The Cidr Report CIDR Report (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 02:00:02 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Jim Hickstein (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 02:23:31 EDT)
• Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones senthil ayyasamy (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 06:34:54 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Tim Thorne (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 07:45:35 EDT)
• Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Sean M. Doran (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 08:49:32 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Jeff Ogden (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 15:31:03 EDT)
• Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Sean Donelan (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 15:41:08 EDT)
• Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Paul Vixie (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:19:04 EDT)
• Re: Echo John R. Levine (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:24:30 EDT)
• Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Stephen J. Wilcox (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:30:12 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Jared Mauch (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 17:04:05 EDT)
• Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Johannes Ullrich (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:37:08 EDT)
• Re: Echo Brad Knowles (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 17:36:49 EDT)
• Re: Echo Brad Knowles (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 17:38:21 EDT)
• Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Vadim Antonov (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 18:07:56 EDT)
• Re: Echo Karsten W. Rohrbach (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 19:08:37 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Ralph Doncaster (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 19:17:54 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Majdi S. Abbas (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 22:33:45 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Richard A Steenbergen (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 22:43:54 EDT)
• Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Sean Donelan (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 22:47:14 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Petri Helenius (Sun Aug 18 2002 - 04:36:32 EDT)
• Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Patrick W. Gilmore (Sun Aug 18 2002 - 11:17:04 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Marshall Eubanks (Sun Aug 18 2002 - 11:38:27 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Tim Thorne (Sun Aug 18 2002 - 11:54:11 EDT)
• Re: Echo Brad Knowles (Sat Aug 17 2002 - 18:16:09 EDT)
• Re: Echo Brad Knowles (Sun Aug 18 2002 - 15:05:04 EDT)
• Anyone from Prodigy or L3 listening? (W32/Yaha Complaint) Richard Forno (Sun Aug 18 2002 - 16:25:16 EDT)
• new reverse-DNS generation process at APNIC George Michaelson (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 12:42:37 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Jeff Ogden (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 11:43:46 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Owen DeLong (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 11:46:10 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Stephen J. Wilcox (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 11:49:50 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones (no name) (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 11:59:03 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Jeff S Wheeler (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 12:11:24 EDT)
• Secure Cabinets Andrew Dorsett (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 12:11:02 EDT)
• Fwd: Re: Secure Cabinets Andrew Dorsett (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 12:28:27 EDT)
• Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Marshall Eubanks (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 12:55:55 EDT)
• RE: Re: Secure Cabinets Benjamin J. Carrasco (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 13:08:54 EDT)
• RE: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Deepak Jain (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 13:06:02 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Greg Maxwell (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 13:16:35 EDT)
• RE: Re: Secure Cabinets Rishi Singh (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 13:21:15 EDT)
• RE: Major Labels v. Backbones Benjamin J. Carrasco (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 14:08:13 EDT)
• Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Stephen Stuart (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 14:02:06 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones David Schwartz (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 14:03:58 EDT)
• 95th percentile Scott Granados (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 14:29:30 EDT)
• Re: 95th percentile (no name) (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 14:36:41 EDT)
• Re: 95th percentile Scott Granados (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 14:40:44 EDT)
• Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Tim Thorne (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 14:57:38 EDT)
• Re: 95th percentile Barb Dijker (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 15:03:02 EDT)
• Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Joe Baptista (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 15:02:34 EDT)
• Re: Secure Cabinets Allan Liska (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 15:11:45 EDT)
• ASN registry? Ralph Doncaster (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 15:24:49 EDT)
• RE: ASN registry? Mark Segal (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 15:34:54 EDT)
• RE: Major Labels v. Backbones Dan Hollis (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 15:38:07 EDT)
• Re: ASN registry? Andy Dills (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 15:42:08 EDT)
• RE: ASN registry? Derek Samford (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 15:50:57 EDT)
• RE: ASN registry? Kris Foster (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 15:56:11 EDT)
• RE: ASN registry? Michael Hallgren (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 16:01:29 EDT)
• RE: ASN registry? Derek Samford (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 16:00:33 EDT)
• RE: ASN registry? Andy Dills (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 16:10:26 EDT)
• RE: ASN registry? Michael Hallgren (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 16:10:11 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones JC Dill (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 16:16:38 EDT)
• RE: ASN registry? Michael Hallgren (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 16:26:25 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Miles Fidelman (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 16:33:04 EDT)
• Re: ASN registry? Ralph Doncaster (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 16:34:18 EDT)
• [apops] The Cidr Report CIDR Report (Sat Aug 10 2002 - 02:00:02 EDT)
• Re: Secure Cabinets Brian (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 16:50:10 EDT)
• Re: Secure Cabinets Robert E. Seastrom (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 17:42:29 EDT)
• Sniffers/Analysers Dr. Mosh (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 18:29:24 EDT)
• RE: Sniffers/Analysers Stanley, Jon (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 18:44:22 EDT)
• RE: ASN registry? blitz (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 17:47:16 EDT)
• Re: Corporate PGP for network operators Len Sassaman (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 19:17:53 EDT)
• RE: ASN registry? Steve Meuse (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 19:55:01 EDT)
• Re: ASN registry? (no name) (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 20:32:14 EDT)
• Re: ASN registry? Philip Smith (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 20:45:00 EDT)
• Re: Fwd: Re: Secure Cabinets David Lesher (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 21:44:10 EDT)
• Broadview Networks Mike Moglin (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 22:18:04 EDT)
• Safety Alert: Fwd: Company Recalls DVM's blitz (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 23:02:04 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Jeff Ogden (Mon Aug 19 2002 - 23:04:15 EDT)
• Re: ASN registry? Hank Nussbacher (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 00:20:35 EDT)
• Re: ASN registry? Stephen J. Wilcox (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 05:23:30 EDT)
• Unrecognised packets cw (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 06:48:26 EDT)
• Re: ASN registry? Mark Prior (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 08:01:15 EDT)
• Re: Unrecognised packets Vadim Antonov (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 08:09:30 EDT)
• Re: Unrecognised packets cw (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 08:28:15 EDT)
• RE: Sniffers/Analysers (no name) (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 09:57:53 EDT)
• RE: Unrecognised packets Daniska Tomas (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 12:11:23 EDT)
• Fall NANOG - held jointly with ARIN Susan Harris (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 12:43:27 EDT)
• Equinix Smart Hands Service Ali Jackson (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 13:57:02 EDT)
• Re: your mail Nathan Stratton (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 14:07:49 EDT)
• Re: your mail Alex Rubenstein (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 14:17:18 EDT)
• Re: your mail Paul Vixie (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 14:54:16 EDT)
• RE: your mail N. Richard Solis (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 15:08:22 EDT)
• Re: your mail David Diaz (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 15:10:22 EDT)
• RE: your mail Daniel Golding (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 15:12:46 EDT)
• Re: your mail Majdi S. Abbas (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 15:13:28 EDT)
• RE: your mail Deepak Jain (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 15:14:30 EDT)
• Re: your mail Richard A Steenbergen (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 15:16:24 EDT)
• Re: an itty bitty survey... Anthony Cennami (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 16:40:29 EDT)
• RE: your mail N. Richard Solis (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 16:39:36 EDT)
• RE: your mail Nathan Stratton (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 17:00:09 EDT)
• RE: your mail Nathan Stratton (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 17:02:06 EDT)
• RE: your mail Nathan Stratton (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 17:07:01 EDT)
• Re: your mail Scott Granados (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 17:08:41 EDT)
• Re: your mail Paul Vixie (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 17:10:38 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Jeff Ogden (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 17:11:07 EDT)
• RE: your mail Deepak Jain (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 17:11:12 EDT)
• RE: your mail N. Richard Solis (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 17:11:47 EDT)
• Re: Major Labels v. Backbones (no name) (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 17:26:00 EDT)
• RE: your mail Patrick (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 17:28:11 EDT)
• Hovercraft for deliveries to the fifth floor loading dock (was Re: Your mail) Sean Donelan (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 18:50:00 EDT)
• IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org (no email) (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 19:12:51 EDT)
• Re: Hovercraft for deliveries to the fifth floor loading dock (was Re: Your mail) Jay Adelson (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 19:45:28 EDT)
• Re: Hovercraft for deliveries to the fifth floor loading dock (was Re: Your mail) Patrick (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 20:29:43 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org (no email) (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 21:52:40 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Avleen Vig (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 22:10:22 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org (no email) (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 22:07:50 EDT)
• Verizon sued by RIAA ? Marshall Eubanks (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 23:20:09 EDT)
• Re: Hovercraft for deliveries to the fifth floor loading dock (was Re: Your mail) Jay Adelson (Tue Aug 20 2002 - 23:52:23 EDT)
• Re: your mail David Lesher (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 00:32:24 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Avleen Vig (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 01:13:41 EDT)
• Shared facilities (was Re: your mail) Sean Donelan (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 02:03:21 EDT)
• Re: your mail Martin Hannigan (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 03:27:46 EDT)
• Re: Shared facilities (was Re: your mail) Martin Hannigan (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 03:30:42 EDT)
• Re[2]: your mail Richard Welty (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 06:56:14 EDT)
• RE: your mail N. Richard Solis (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 07:25:48 EDT)
• RE: Shared facilities (was Re: your mail) N. Richard Solis (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 07:32:10 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org (no name) (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 10:00:02 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 10:29:28 EDT)
• Re: your mail Pawlukiewicz Jane (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 10:30:34 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Ron da Silva (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 10:53:19 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Peter van Dijk (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 11:23:36 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Dave Israel (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 11:32:47 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 11:50:01 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org batz (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 12:25:31 EDT)
• Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) Sean Donelan (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 13:51:17 EDT)
• Re: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) Mike Leber (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 13:56:25 EDT)
• RE: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) N. Richard Solis (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 14:17:47 EDT)
• QWest internet & the 1996 Telecom Act Andy (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 14:21:29 EDT)
• FC: RIAA presses Verizon for name of peer-to-peer subscriber (was: Verision being sued?) Gregory Hicks (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 14:22:31 EDT)
• FW: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) Jerry Eyers (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 14:19:02 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Gary E. Miller (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 14:47:59 EDT)
• Re: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) Vincent J. Bono (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 14:50:21 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Mark Segal (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 15:11:59 EDT)
• Re: FC: RIAA presses Verizon for name of peer-to-peer subscriber (was: Verision being sued?) Marshall Eubanks (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 15:12:33 EDT)
• DNS entries for infrastructure equipment Dan Lockwood (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 15:16:20 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org batz (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 15:06:06 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 15:29:46 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Derek Samford (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 15:28:17 EDT)
• Re: DNS entries for infrastructure equipment jnull (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 15:40:57 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Larry Rosenman (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 15:38:31 EDT)
• .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Vinny Abello (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 15:46:22 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 15:46:29 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Gary E. Miller (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 15:48:03 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org (no email) (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 15:35:21 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 15:50:58 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Jared Mauch (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 15:51:36 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 15:54:22 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Larry Rosenman (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 15:57:04 EDT)
• Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Joe Abley (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 15:59:40 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Jared Mauch (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 15:55:41 EDT)
• Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? (no name) (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:01:51 EDT)
• Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Pete Ehlke (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:04:43 EDT)
• Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Vinny Abello (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:09:21 EDT)
• Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Chris Adams (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:12:28 EDT)
• Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? (no name) (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:17:15 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org (no name) (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:17:53 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org (no name) (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:20:14 EDT)
• Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Randy Bush (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:24:45 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org (no name) (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:17:37 EDT)
• Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Randy Bush (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:19:31 EDT)
• RE: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Al Rowland (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:33:34 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Al Rowland (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:25:17 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Jared Mauch (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:25:35 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org James Smith (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:30:25 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Larry Rosenman (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:31:00 EDT)
• RE: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) Deepak Jain (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:27:39 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert A. Hayden (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:25:50 EDT)
• [Fwd: Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org] (no name) (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:21:03 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:49:58 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org (no name) (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:36:26 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:40:46 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Gary E. Miller (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:51:36 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert A. Hayden (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:37:18 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Petri Helenius (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 17:02:24 EDT)
• Die thread, DIE! -> Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Vinny Abello (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:45:20 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:55:07 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:44:52 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:47:31 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:35:39 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org batz (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:44:36 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Randy Bush (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 16:59:17 EDT)
• RE: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) Gerald (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 17:30:06 EDT)
• Draft of a new NANOG FAQ Susan Harris (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 17:05:26 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org (no email) (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 17:15:06 EDT)
• EPOs in critical facilities Sean Donelan (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 17:28:48 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Gary E. Miller (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 17:57:14 EDT)
• mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Mikael Abrahamsson (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 18:09:18 EDT)
• Re: EPOs in critical facilities Richard Welty (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 18:13:53 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Peter E. Fry (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 18:35:49 EDT)
• Re: DNS entries for infrastructure equipment Stephen Miller (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 18:39:25 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Al Rowland (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 18:42:53 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Peter E. Fry (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 18:42:16 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Barry Shein (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 18:45:41 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 17:16:13 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 17:21:42 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 17:29:21 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 17:40:13 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 19:13:36 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Vivien M. (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 19:22:33 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 19:20:41 EDT)
• RE: EPOs in critical facilities Deepak Jain (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 19:22:50 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Gary E. Miller (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 19:22:53 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 19:23:34 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 19:17:03 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 19:16:06 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 19:08:52 EDT)
• Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 19:14:03 EDT)
• Re: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) Vincent J. Bono (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 19:26:27 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 19:33:33 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 19:36:37 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 19:38:53 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 19:31:31 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Vivien M. (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 19:40:08 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org (no email) (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 19:40:54 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Gary E. Miller (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 20:01:35 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Dave Israel (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 20:12:31 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org J.A. Terranson (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 20:20:28 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Dave Israel (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 20:18:05 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Dave Israel (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 20:24:19 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org J.A. Terranson (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 20:25:57 EDT)
• Re: DNS entries for infrastructure equipment Richard A Steenbergen (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 20:24:49 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org William Rockwood (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 20:35:06 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 20:41:57 EDT)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org] Paul Vixie (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 20:50:42 EDT)
• Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Paul Vixie (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 20:56:08 EDT)
• RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Vivien M. (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 21:02:23 EDT)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org] Dave Stewart (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 21:11:02 EDT)
• RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Nigel Clarke (Thu Aug 22 2002 - 00:08:03 EDT)
• RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Ralph Doncaster (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 21:30:35 EDT)
• Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Richard A Steenbergen (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 21:30:27 EDT)
• Controlling RIAA's "hired guns" Nigel Clarke (Thu Aug 22 2002 - 00:22:17 EDT)
• RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs?