From: Scott Weeks (no email)
Date: Mon Aug 05 2002 - 15:57:46 EDT
On Sun, 4 Aug 2002, Sean Donelan wrote:
[snip]
: > Diverse input to a government process can be good for learning about
: > choices, but consensus views should be helpful for making them.
:
: What group is the best forum for developing consensus views on
: Internet operation policy issues?
:
: One of the Mr. Clarke's complaints in his speech was there is no group
: the government can go to find out what the consensus view of Internet
: operators is. IETF doesn't appear to want to take on that role. NANOG
: isn't structured to develop policies for ISPs. IOPS, ICANN, ISPSEC, etc
: have issues. ATIS, ITU, NRIC, NSTAC would love to take on the role.
:
: The National Cybersecurity Plan (or whatever the final name ends up) will
: be announced in September. The next NANOG meeting is October 27-29. The
: next IETF meeting is November 17-21.
Invite him and/or members of his team to NANOG...
scott
|
|
|