Nanog 0105
By Author

1140 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
About this archive
Other mail archives

Starting: Tue May 01 2001 - 00:57:58 EDT
Ending: Thu May 31 2001 - 21:23:07 EDT

• (no email)
  • Re: NANOG Digest V1 #737 (Tue May 29 2001 - 23:30:14 EDT)
  • Re: Tucows/OpenSRS Down (Tue May 29 2001 - 11:51:33 EDT)
  • Re: NANOG Digest V1 #737 (Tue May 29 2001 - 11:11:27 EDT)
  • Re: Mitch tries to defend his open relay again (was Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning)) (Mon May 28 2001 - 15:21:21 EDT)
  • RE: Stealth Blocking (Fri May 25 2001 - 00:44:28 EDT)
  • RE: Stealth Blocking (Fri May 25 2001 - 00:03:26 EDT)
  • RE: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 20:54:27 EDT)
  • RE: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 23:10:58 EDT)
  • Re: Query: What policies do backbone providers use to determine IP ownership? (Wed May 23 2001 - 22:30:41 EDT)
• (no name)
  • Re: More BW, Less Taxes (Wed May 30 2001 - 00:55:57 EDT)
  • RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 14:01:51 EDT)
  • Re: last mile capacity [was Re: QOS or more bandwidth] (Tue May 29 2001 - 13:24:46 EDT)
  • Re: port filtering list (Tue May 29 2001 - 12:58:39 EDT)
  • Re: last mile capacity [was Re: QOS or more bandwidth] (Tue May 29 2001 - 12:56:33 EDT)
  • Re: More BW, Less Taxes (Tue May 29 2001 - 12:42:11 EDT)
  • Re: More BW, Less Taxes (Tue May 29 2001 - 12:28:40 EDT)
  • More BW, Less Taxes (Tue May 29 2001 - 11:37:27 EDT)
  • Re: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 11:14:51 EDT)
  • Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning) (Tue May 29 2001 - 10:17:12 EDT)
  • Re: port filtering list (Tue May 29 2001 - 10:04:26 EDT)
  • Re: VPN Solution (Tue May 29 2001 - 09:43:24 EDT)
  • port filtering list (Tue May 29 2001 - 09:28:26 EDT)
  • Re: Mitch tries to defend his open relay again (was Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning)) (Mon May 28 2001 - 23:50:48 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Sat May 26 2001 - 19:43:17 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Sat May 26 2001 - 16:36:43 EDT)
  • Re: cleaning up MIME external-body attachments.... (Sat May 26 2001 - 15:32:19 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Sat May 26 2001 - 15:14:47 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Sat May 26 2001 - 00:20:36 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Sat May 26 2001 - 02:32:13 EDT)
  • Re: Email Parcel Post is Good! (Fri May 25 2001 - 18:08:38 EDT)
  • Re: Possible solution? (e-mail parcel vs. FTP) (Fri May 25 2001 - 12:59:01 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 12:29:46 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 16:35:37 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 14:02:30 EDT)
  • MTU sizing? was stealth blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 13:29:03 EDT)
  • Why are you all still here? (Was Re: Stealth Blocking) (Thu May 24 2001 - 11:33:48 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 11:04:24 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 01:30:01 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 15:34:48 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 13:42:42 EDT)
  • Re: Stability of the Internet? (Wed May 23 2001 - 13:57:40 EDT)
  • Re: Stability of the Internet? (Wed May 23 2001 - 13:39:58 EDT)
  • Re: Stability of the Internet? (Wed May 23 2001 - 13:16:19 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 11:08:26 EDT)
  • Re: Stability of the Internet? (Wed May 23 2001 - 08:45:11 EDT)
  • Re: Stability of the Internet? (Mon May 21 2001 - 19:01:45 EDT)
  • Re: Stability of the Internet? (Mon May 21 2001 - 10:07:49 EDT)
  • Re: bgp table history wanted (Sun May 20 2001 - 00:35:40 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Tue May 15 2001 - 10:18:55 EDT)
  • 2 Wire T1 - HDLC (Tue May 15 2001 - 08:10:29 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 17:56:34 EDT)
  • Re: People who purchase unproven technologies to support their Business, and whine about it. RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND (Mon May 14 2001 - 17:44:08 EDT)
  • Re: reverse mapping, was WAKEUPANDTAKECARE (Mon May 14 2001 - 09:44:17 EDT)
  • re: in-addr survey (Mon May 14 2001 - 17:30:00 EDT)
  • Re: in-addr survey? (Fri May 11 2001 - 18:49:45 EDT)
  • Re: Abuse notification in Chinese (was:black hat .cn networks) (Wed May 09 2001 - 15:34:20 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Wed May 09 2001 - 13:36:58 EDT)
  • Re: Abuse notification in Chinese (was:black hat .cn networks) (Wed May 09 2001 - 12:21:30 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? (Mon May 07 2001 - 21:27:13 EDT)
  • Re: terminal server recommendation (Wed May 02 2001 - 08:43:49 EDT)
  • Re: terminal server recommendation (Wed May 02 2001 - 07:38:32 EDT)
  • OT: GUI ACL Editor? (Tue May 01 2001 - 12:13:40 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 01 2001 - 11:27:14 EDT)
  • Re: Use of IPv6 /127 prefixes (Tue May 01 2001 - 02:33:04 EDT)
• Aaron
  • Re: "Big Red" (Fri May 25 2001 - 01:26:23 EDT)
  • Sympatico technical contact (Sat May 12 2001 - 15:02:59 EDT)
• Aaron Dewell
  • Re: terminal server recommendation (Tue May 01 2001 - 16:47:53 EDT)
• Aaron L. Meehan
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 19:50:14 EDT)
• Adam McKenna
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Tue May 15 2001 - 02:18:09 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 13:24:54 EDT)
  • Re: People who purchase unproven technologies to support their Business, and whine about it. RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 13:17:53 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 13:14:57 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 04:23:03 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 01:06:15 EDT)
• Adam Rothschild
  • Re: Mitch tries to defend his open relay again (was Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning)) (Mon May 28 2001 - 12:29:04 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Sun May 27 2001 - 12:58:30 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Sat May 26 2001 - 15:48:54 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Fri May 25 2001 - 01:16:03 EDT)
  • Re: Why are you all still here? (Was Re: Stealth Blocking) (Thu May 24 2001 - 15:18:48 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 13:31:22 EDT)
  • Re: The DSL business model (Tue May 15 2001 - 16:36:02 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 13:57:37 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 01 2001 - 10:58:33 EDT)
• Adrian Chadd
  • Re: Common language? [was re: black hat .cn networks] (Thu May 10 2001 - 02:42:17 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Wed May 09 2001 - 12:26:00 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Wed May 09 2001 - 03:39:04 EDT)
  • Re: ISP Filter Policies--Effect is what? (Tue May 08 2001 - 13:18:06 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 07:06:34 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 06:55:00 EDT)
  • Re: terminal server recommendation (Wed May 02 2001 - 03:25:17 EDT)
• Advanced Hosting UNIX Admin Daniel Fairchild
  • Fwd: IS anyone else seeing this. (Fri May 18 2001 - 18:29:00 EDT)
  • Re: IS anyone else seeing this. Aliitle more info. (Fri May 18 2001 - 17:10:41 EDT)
  • IS anyone else seeing this. (Fri May 18 2001 - 16:36:27 EDT)
• Alan Clegg
  • Re: NEW GROUP FORMED FOR UNOFFICIAL INTERNET TLD OWNERS (Wed May 23 2001 - 13:32:15 EDT)
• Alan Hannan
  • Re: How many routed hops would be considered too many to leave an AS (Tue May 15 2001 - 02:09:42 EDT)
  • Re: GSR Route Reflector: maximum number of clients? (Wed May 02 2001 - 00:30:13 EDT)
• Albert Meyer
  • Re: More BW, Less Taxes (Wed May 30 2001 - 15:12:11 EDT)
  • Re: More BW, Less Taxes (Tue May 29 2001 - 11:51:37 EDT)
  • Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning) (Sun May 27 2001 - 21:15:51 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Sat May 26 2001 - 00:25:07 EDT)
  • Re: Splitting a block of Class C's (Fri May 25 2001 - 19:37:39 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 18:54:27 EDT)
  • Re: Splitting a block of Class C's (Fri May 25 2001 - 00:08:19 EDT)
  • Re: Splitting a block of Class C's (Thu May 24 2001 - 21:11:23 EDT)
  • Splitting a block of Class C's (Thu May 24 2001 - 17:40:57 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 13:00:21 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 20:33:43 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 13:59:44 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Mon May 21 2001 - 20:39:04 EDT)
  • RE: Stability of the Internet? (Fri May 18 2001 - 21:13:20 EDT)
  • Re: Instant chats and central servers (Tue May 08 2001 - 15:04:20 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? (Mon May 07 2001 - 12:16:25 EDT)
• Alex Bligh
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 18:42:21 EDT)
  • Re: DSL line stealing when there is no tone - DANGER - Operational content (Wed May 16 2001 - 17:03:30 EDT)
  • DSL line stealing when there is no tone - DANGER - Operational content (Mon May 14 2001 - 17:21:22 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? (Tue May 08 2001 - 12:20:26 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 01 2001 - 05:59:46 EDT)
• Alex Pilosov
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 23:23:10 EDT)
• Alex Rubenstein
  • Re: More BW, Less Taxes (Tue May 29 2001 - 23:59:12 EDT)
  • Re: More BW, Less Taxes (Tue May 29 2001 - 23:57:09 EDT)
  • Re: ARIN, and reservations? (Thu May 17 2001 - 13:54:41 EDT)
  • ARIN, and reservations? (Thu May 17 2001 - 10:43:02 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Tue May 15 2001 - 01:42:24 EDT)
  • Re: People who purchase unproven technologies...DSL (Mon May 14 2001 - 11:28:34 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Sun May 13 2001 - 21:02:35 EDT)
  • Re: Intermedia (ICIX) brokenness... (Fri May 04 2001 - 10:28:07 EDT)
• Alexei Roudnev
  • Re: VPN Solution (WAS: ORBS (Re: Scanning)) (Mon May 28 2001 - 03:36:23 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 13:18:51 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 13:10:03 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 13:06:22 EDT)
  • EMAIl ==> MAIL ==> parsels + letters (Fri May 25 2001 - 13:01:35 EDT)
  • Re: XO is broken (Tue May 01 2001 - 05:15:20 EDT)
• Alison K Gudgeon
  • RE: Real use of VPN (Wed May 30 2001 - 07:50:28 EDT)
• Andrew Brown
  • Re: Email Parcel Post is Good! (Fri May 25 2001 - 15:06:13 EDT)
  • Re: Email Parcel Post is Good! (Fri May 25 2001 - 13:59:16 EDT)
  • Re: Email Parcel Post is Good! (Fri May 25 2001 - 12:02:29 EDT)
  • Re: Stability of the Internet? (Tue May 22 2001 - 21:43:09 EDT)
• Andrew Dorsett
  • Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding (Thu May 31 2001 - 18:11:12 EDT)
  • engineering --> ddos and flooding (Thu May 31 2001 - 17:59:18 EDT)
• Andy
  • Re: Splitting a block of Class C's (Thu May 24 2001 - 21:13:45 EDT)
  • Re: Splitting a block of Class C's (Thu May 24 2001 - 20:39:31 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 14:02:00 EDT)
• Andy Bradford
  • Re: VPN Solution (WAS: ORBS (Re: Scanning)) (Mon May 28 2001 - 17:43:18 EDT)
  • Re: Strange IPSEC activity over UUNet.. (Sun May 27 2001 - 16:59:33 EDT)
• Andy Dills
  • RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Tue May 15 2001 - 14:29:39 EDT)
  • Re: terminal server recommendation (Tue May 01 2001 - 17:14:48 EDT)
• Antony
  • Re: bgp table history wanted (Sun May 20 2001 - 05:16:22 EDT)
• Ariel Biener
  • Re: Stability of the Internet? (Fri May 18 2001 - 11:42:30 EDT)
• ARIN IN-ADDR Role
  • New in-addr.arpa release (Fri May 25 2001 - 12:26:11 EDT)
  • in-addr.arpa zone generation process to change (Thu May 17 2001 - 16:17:49 EDT)
• Arnold Nipper
  • experience with BGP on Extreme's Alpine (Wed May 30 2001 - 18:22:50 EDT)
  • Re: foreign upstarts dare to use their own languages [was: Re: black hat .cn networks] (Wed May 09 2001 - 18:52:11 EDT)
  • Traffic generator for loadbalancer test (Wed May 09 2001 - 18:49:06 EDT)
  • Re: Traffic per Prefix Length (Thu May 03 2001 - 19:55:57 EDT)
• Avleen Vig
  • Re: port filtering list (Tue May 29 2001 - 10:19:35 EDT)
• Barrows, Jeff
  • RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? (Mon May 07 2001 - 17:06:42 EDT)
• Barton F Bruce
  • Re: 2 Wire T1 - HDLC (Wed May 16 2001 - 13:50:01 EDT)
• batz
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Wed May 09 2001 - 15:04:04 EDT)
• Ben Beuchler
  • Re: terminal server recommendation (Tue May 01 2001 - 16:22:45 EDT)
• Bill Manning
  • your talk on v6 (fwd) (Tue May 22 2001 - 19:00:45 EDT)
• Bill Nickless
  • Re: Instant chats and central servers (Wed May 16 2001 - 12:38:46 EDT)
• Bill Thomas
  • Cisco DS3 Performance data (Wed May 09 2001 - 09:53:37 EDT)
  • Cisco DS3 performance specifications (Tue May 08 2001 - 10:44:08 EDT)
• Bill Woodcock
  • RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 13:34:09 EDT)
  • Re: [zoc-0635624] [uunet-395213]: Not to be alarmist, but is there aknown problem in San Diego? (Tue May 29 2001 - 09:55:56 EDT)
  • [zoc-0635624] [uunet-395213]: Not to be alarmist, but is there a known problem in San Diego? (Tue May 29 2001 - 09:26:46 EDT)
  • Re: Yipes!....question. (Sat May 26 2001 - 20:35:50 EDT)
  • Re: PacBell Frame Relay Outage? (Fri May 25 2001 - 18:40:15 EDT)
  • Re: PacBell Frame Relay Outage? (Fri May 25 2001 - 16:12:04 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 14:01:46 EDT)
  • Re: People who purchase unproven technologies to support their Business, and whine about it. RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 13:01:55 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Sun May 13 2001 - 19:35:26 EDT)
  • Re: Traffic per Prefix Length (Sat May 05 2001 - 11:05:23 EDT)
• Bob Stovall
  • Re: Nanog LiveCast (Tue May 22 2001 - 10:38:48 EDT)
• BrandonButterworth
  • Re: Stability of the Internet? (Fri May 18 2001 - 12:31:31 EDT)
• Brett Frankenberger
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Tue May 15 2001 - 15:09:30 EDT)
• Bruce Campbell
  • Re: Stability of the Internet? (Mon May 21 2001 - 01:40:47 EDT)
  • Re: heads up on 80/8 [actually operational, so don't read this!!!] (Thu May 17 2001 - 03:42:05 EDT)
• Bryan C. Andregg
  • Re: Stability of the Internet? (Wed May 23 2001 - 11:16:06 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 15:24:29 EDT)
• Bulger, Tim
  • <OT> OPNET information... (Wed May 23 2001 - 12:42:25 EDT)
• Casey Ransom
  • Re: looking for some bits in SE wisconsin (Tue May 15 2001 - 13:45:47 EDT)
  • looking for some bits in SE wisconsin (Tue May 15 2001 - 13:07:26 EDT)
• Cerqua, Toby
  • RE: Instant chats and central servers (Tue May 08 2001 - 17:44:36 EDT)
• Chance Whaley
  • RE: 10 gige experience (Wed May 09 2001 - 18:57:30 EDT)
• Charles Scott
  • Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? (Mon May 07 2001 - 12:44:56 EDT)
• Charles Smith
  • terminal server recommendation (Tue May 01 2001 - 16:12:34 EDT)
• Charles Sprickman
  • Re: More demand or less supply? (Fri May 18 2001 - 11:44:59 EDT)
  • Re: HR 1542 (Sat May 05 2001 - 17:42:05 EDT)
  • RE: terminal server recommendation (Tue May 01 2001 - 21:28:12 EDT)
• Chris Beggy
  • Re: port filtering list (Wed May 30 2001 - 11:18:06 EDT)
• Chris Kilbourn
  • Re: ARIN, and reservations? (Thu May 17 2001 - 15:00:40 EDT)
  • Re: ARIN, and reservations? (Thu May 17 2001 - 11:43:43 EDT)
• Christian Kuhtz
  • Re: How many routed hops would be considered too many to leave an AS (Mon May 14 2001 - 23:44:11 EDT)
  • Re: 2 Wire T1 - HDLC (Mon May 14 2001 - 23:39:00 EDT)
• Christian Nielsen
  • Re: Carrier Circus (was RE: Intermedia (ICIX) brokenness...) (Fri May 04 2001 - 18:05:04 EDT)
• Christopher A. Woodfield
  • Re: More BW, Less Taxes (Wed May 30 2001 - 09:06:04 EDT)
  • Re: Scanning (was Re: Stealth Blocking) (Sun May 27 2001 - 12:40:14 EDT)
  • Re: Scanning (was Re: Stealth Blocking) (Sat May 26 2001 - 10:35:47 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 15:43:36 EDT)
  • Re: The DSL business model (Tue May 15 2001 - 16:23:21 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 17:27:09 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 16:40:35 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 11:39:22 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 11:46:05 EDT)
  • Re: 10 gige experience (Thu May 10 2001 - 11:17:31 EDT)
  • Re: Instant chats and central servers (Tue May 08 2001 - 18:45:55 EDT)
• Christopher B. Zydel
  • Re: NANOG Digest V1 #737 (Tue May 29 2001 - 11:03:38 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 22:00:38 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 19:02:35 EDT)
• Clayton Fiske
  • Re: People who purchase unproven technologies to support their Business, and whine about it. RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Tue May 15 2001 - 15:16:09 EDT)
  • Re: ICG Status (Tue May 15 2001 - 15:07:01 EDT)
  • Re: Common language? [was re: black hat .cn networks] (Thu May 10 2001 - 12:52:08 EDT)
  • Common language? [was re: black hat .cn networks] (Thu May 10 2001 - 01:17:47 EDT)
• Clemens Zauner
  • Anybody from gblx here ? (Mon May 14 2001 - 11:45:36 EDT)
• Craig A. Haney
  • Re: Northern VA CATV systems (Wed May 09 2001 - 07:43:27 EDT)
• Craig Holland
  • RE: VPN Solution (WAS: ORBS (Re: Scanning)) (Mon May 28 2001 - 04:03:01 EDT)
  • Strange IPSEC activity over UUNet.. (Fri May 25 2001 - 14:01:24 EDT)
• Craig Partridge
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 11:34:09 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 08:27:19 EDT)
  • Re: bgp table history wanted (Sat May 19 2001 - 21:23:29 EDT)
• Cutler, James R
  • Email Parcel Post is Good! (Fri May 25 2001 - 08:13:18 EDT)
• Dan Hollis
  • RE: ORBS (Re: Scanning) (Sun May 27 2001 - 20:53:30 EDT)
  • Re: Anti-spoofing: is anyone doing it? (Sun May 27 2001 - 01:21:29 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Fri May 25 2001 - 14:04:34 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 20:40:33 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 15:28:35 EDT)
  • Re: People who purchase unproven technologies to support their Business, and whine about it. RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 13:40:02 EDT)
  • Re: People who purchase unproven technologies...DSL (Mon May 14 2001 - 13:37:32 EDT)
  • Re: People who purchase unproven technologies to support their Business, and whine about it. RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 13:45:43 EDT)
  • Re: People who purchase unproven technologies... (Mon May 14 2001 - 14:46:47 EDT)
  • RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Sun May 13 2001 - 22:03:47 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Sun May 13 2001 - 21:45:32 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 15:18:14 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 14:17:30 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 13:56:53 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 13:46:46 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 06:24:38 EDT)
  • RE: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 04:50:56 EDT)
  • RE: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 02:13:23 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Mon May 07 2001 - 14:51:22 EDT)
  • Re: terminal server recommendation (Tue May 01 2001 - 19:00:14 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 01 2001 - 14:00:41 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 01 2001 - 01:51:06 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 22:43:27 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 21:09:25 EDT)
• Daniel Golding
  • RE: Query: What policies do backbone providers use to determine IP ownership? (Wed May 23 2001 - 12:14:09 EDT)
  • RE: The DSL business model (Wed May 16 2001 - 15:54:07 EDT)
  • RE: heads up on 80/8 [actually operational, so don't read this!!!] (Wed May 16 2001 - 11:15:12 EDT)
  • RE: How many routed hops would be considered too many to leave an AS (Mon May 14 2001 - 23:54:11 EDT)
  • RE: Dont Knock The Technology, was Re: People who purchase unproven technologies to support theirBusiness, and whine about it. (Mon May 14 2001 - 17:07:56 EDT)
  • RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? (Sun May 06 2001 - 02:27:37 EDT)
• Daniel Senie
  • Re: More BW, Less Taxes (Wed May 30 2001 - 00:34:01 EDT)
  • cnn.com name servers all in one AS (Sun May 27 2001 - 11:17:15 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Fri May 25 2001 - 00:45:24 EDT)
  • Re: DSL line stealing when there is no tone - DANGER - Operational content (Wed May 16 2001 - 17:14:35 EDT)
  • Re: People who purchase unproven technologies...DSL (Mon May 14 2001 - 15:18:26 EDT)
  • Re: HR 1542 (Sat May 05 2001 - 22:20:32 EDT)
• Danny McPherson
  • Re: Next-hop Reachability on ATM NAPs (Wed May 23 2001 - 12:31:01 EDT)
• Daryl G. Jurbala
  • RE: Abuse notification in Chinese (was:black hat .cn networks) (Wed May 09 2001 - 12:29:09 EDT)
  • Abuse notification in Chinese (was:black hat .cn networks) (Wed May 09 2001 - 11:21:56 EDT)
• Dave Israel
  • Re: A question on CE to PE route exchanges ... (Tue May 22 2001 - 13:49:30 EDT)
  • RE: A question on CE to PE route exchanges ... (Sun May 20 2001 - 19:55:13 EDT)
  • Re: A question on CE to PE route exchanges ... (Fri May 18 2001 - 17:45:02 EDT)
  • Re: Instant chats and central servers (Tue May 08 2001 - 15:40:25 EDT)
• dave o'leary
  • Network Management acronyms/tutorials - RE: Request for a clue! (Thu May 24 2001 - 13:27:24 EDT)
  • Re: 10 gige experience (Wed May 09 2001 - 22:35:24 EDT)
  • Re: Network Simulation and Measurement Software (Wed May 09 2001 - 17:40:25 EDT)
• Dave Rand
  • Re: Mitch tries to defend his open relay again (was Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning)) (Thu May 31 2001 - 02:52:47 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 17:06:54 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 15:58:52 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 14:59:11 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 14:08:28 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 13:16:36 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 12:35:40 EDT)
• Dave Siegel
  • Re: jumbo frames (Wed May 30 2001 - 17:32:38 EDT)
• David Brousseau
  • OT: GUI ACL Editor? (Tue May 01 2001 - 10:59:02 EDT)
• David Charlap
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 17:57:24 EDT)
  • Re: rfc 3091,3092,3098 (Fri May 18 2001 - 22:09:23 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Tue May 15 2001 - 19:26:41 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 17:54:53 EDT)
• David Diaz
  • Re: Common language? [was re: black hat .cn networks] (Thu May 10 2001 - 12:20:55 EDT)
• David Howe
  • Re: VPN Solution (WAS: ORBS (Re: Scanning)) (Mon May 28 2001 - 08:45:06 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 11:32:01 EDT)
  • Re: Domain-Policy? (Fri May 25 2001 - 05:04:49 EDT)
  • Domain-Policy? (Thu May 24 2001 - 12:00:05 EDT)
• David Lesher
  • Re: More BW, Less Taxes (Wed May 30 2001 - 09:04:32 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Sat May 26 2001 - 22:43:42 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Sat May 26 2001 - 09:55:59 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Sat May 26 2001 - 08:14:18 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Wed May 09 2001 - 19:55:33 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 10:11:54 EDT)
  • Political Correctness Strikes a Blow for free speech.... (Mon May 07 2001 - 14:17:50 EDT)
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US]] (Mon May 07 2001 - 13:33:38 EDT)
  • Re: HR 1542 (Sat May 05 2001 - 17:49:38 EDT)
• David McGaugh
  • ICG Status (Tue May 15 2001 - 11:21:49 EDT)
• David Meyer
  • Re: bgp table history wanted (Sat May 19 2001 - 23:35:08 EDT)
  • Re: bgp table history wanted (Sat May 19 2001 - 19:39:32 EDT)
• David Schwartz
  • RE: Splitting a block of Class C's (Fri May 25 2001 - 01:11:59 EDT)
  • RE: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 05:16:38 EDT)
  • RE: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 22:47:54 EDT)
  • RE: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 22:10:03 EDT)
  • RE: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 20:24:04 EDT)
  • RE: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 19:18:12 EDT)
  • RE: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 19:54:29 EDT)
  • RE: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 18:11:27 EDT)
  • RE: More demand or less supply? (Fri May 18 2001 - 18:21:19 EDT)
  • RE: More demand or less supply? (Fri May 18 2001 - 16:01:18 EDT)
  • RE: Instant chats and central servers (Wed May 09 2001 - 17:46:50 EDT)
  • RE: Instant chats and central servers (Wed May 09 2001 - 17:27:16 EDT)
  • RE: Instant chats and central servers (Wed May 09 2001 - 15:48:56 EDT)
  • RE: Instant chats and central servers (Wed May 09 2001 - 13:35:17 EDT)
  • RE: Instant chats and central servers (Wed May 09 2001 - 00:29:52 EDT)
  • RE: Instant chats and central servers (Tue May 08 2001 - 20:42:48 EDT)
  • RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? (Mon May 07 2001 - 23:19:46 EDT)
  • RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? (Mon May 07 2001 - 19:42:00 EDT)
  • RE: Traffic per Prefix Length (Sat May 05 2001 - 23:18:51 EDT)
  • RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? (Sat May 05 2001 - 22:31:25 EDT)
• David Shaw
  • Re: Instant chats and central servers (Tue May 08 2001 - 22:54:42 EDT)
• David Sinn
  • RE: Cisco DS3 performance specifications (Tue May 08 2001 - 15:36:24 EDT)
• Dean Robb
  • Re: Domain-Policy? (Thu May 24 2001 - 18:44:49 EDT)
• Dee McKinney
  • Stealth Blocking (Mon May 21 2001 - 20:07:24 EDT)
• deeann mikula
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 11:22:15 EDT)
  • Re: Instant chats and central servers (Tue May 08 2001 - 18:56:26 EDT)
• Deepak Jain
  • RE: Query: What policies do backbone providers use to determine IP ownership? (Thu May 24 2001 - 03:16:17 EDT)
  • RE: Common language? [was re: black hat .cn networks] (Thu May 10 2001 - 01:41:57 EDT)
• Dennis Dayman
  • Remote Area Satellite Internet Access (Wed May 23 2001 - 17:34:27 EDT)
• Derek Balling
  • Re: NANOG Digest V1 #737 (Tue May 29 2001 - 11:09:00 EDT)
  • RE: ORBS (Re: Scanning) (Sun May 27 2001 - 21:46:13 EDT)
  • RE: ORBS (Re: Scanning) (Sun May 27 2001 - 14:40:37 EDT)
  • RE: ORBS (Re: Scanning) (Sun May 27 2001 - 14:19:36 EDT)
  • RE: ORBS (Re: Scanning) (Sun May 27 2001 - 13:48:52 EDT)
  • Re: PacBell Frame Relay Outage? (Fri May 25 2001 - 16:15:01 EDT)
  • RE: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 20:53:09 EDT)
• Devon True
  • Tracking down hosts inside your network (Thu May 17 2001 - 17:36:10 EDT)
  • RE: BGP Question: Problems with connectivity when using local pre ferences (Thu May 03 2001 - 23:49:32 EDT)
  • BGP Question: Problems with connectivity when using local prefere nces (Thu May 03 2001 - 21:28:14 EDT)
• Dhanaseker Kandhasamy
  • Re: New prefix. (Sat Apr 28 2001 - 17:41:03 EDT)
• Dominic J. Eidson
  • RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 10:08:39 EDT)
  • Intermedia (ICIX) brokenness... (Fri May 04 2001 - 10:15:26 EDT)
• Douglas A. Dever
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 08:51:14 EDT)
• Dwight A. Ernest
  • Re: Use of IPv6 /127 prefixes (Tue May 01 2001 - 13:37:07 EDT)
• E.B. Dreger
  • Re: Frame-relay outage: Nolo Contendere (Tue May 29 2001 - 13:27:43 EDT)
  • Re: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 09:28:38 EDT)
  • Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning) (Sun May 27 2001 - 16:09:56 EDT)
  • RE: ORBS (Re: Scanning) (Sun May 27 2001 - 13:34:36 EDT)
  • RE: ORBS (Re: Scanning) (Sun May 27 2001 - 12:53:35 EDT)
  • ORBS (Re: Scanning) (Sun May 27 2001 - 11:05:07 EDT)
  • ORBS (Re: Scanning) (Sun May 27 2001 - 10:15:06 EDT)
  • E-mail vs. FTP -- ***RTF RFC*** (Sat May 26 2001 - 10:56:36 EDT)
  • RE: Email Parcel Post is Good! (Fri May 25 2001 - 17:54:25 EDT)
  • Re: Possible solution? (e-mail parcel vs. FTP) (Fri May 25 2001 - 13:03:48 EDT)
  • Possible solution? (e-mail parcel vs. FTP) (Fri May 25 2001 - 11:49:54 EDT)
  • Re: Email Parcel Post is Good! (Fri May 25 2001 - 11:20:54 EDT)
• Elias Halldor Agustsson
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Wed May 02 2001 - 09:54:57 EDT)
• Elwin Eliazer
  • RE: A question on CE to PE route exchanges ... (Sun May 20 2001 - 00:14:40 EDT)
  • A question on CE to PE route exchanges ... (Fri May 18 2001 - 17:13:53 EDT)
• Eric A. Hall
  • Re: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 15:19:54 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 14:33:13 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 14:09:52 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 14:02:34 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 13:23:23 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 12:46:19 EDT)
  • Re: Stability of the Internet? (Fri May 18 2001 - 14:03:31 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Tue May 15 2001 - 13:21:47 EDT)
  • Re: foreign upstarts dare to use their own languages [was: Re:black hat .cn networks] (Wed May 09 2001 - 18:50:42 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 11:42:36 EDT)
  • pass the hat (Fri May 04 2001 - 16:16:02 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 01 2001 - 14:39:10 EDT)
• Eric Hutchinson
  • Nortel & 10Gig Ethernet 802.3ae (Mon May 21 2001 - 08:53:31 EDT)
• Eric Pree
  • RE: Instant chats and central servers (Tue May 08 2001 - 22:12:11 EDT)
• Eric Whitehill
  • RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 13:42:50 EDT)
• Erik Antelman
  • Sadmind/IIS hack from AS9800 (Thu May 10 2001 - 11:45:29 EDT)
• Fletcher E Kittredge
  • Re: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 09:01:02 EDT)
  • Re: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] (Tue May 08 2001 - 08:26:46 EDT)
  • Re: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] (Mon May 07 2001 - 16:51:01 EDT)
  • Re: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] (Mon May 07 2001 - 16:28:52 EDT)
  • Re: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] (Mon May 07 2001 - 16:37:03 EDT)
  • Re: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] (Mon May 07 2001 - 16:31:16 EDT)
  • Re: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] (Mon May 07 2001 - 12:31:53 EDT)
• Frank Coluccio
  • RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 03:19:27 EDT)
  • RE: Reference to the internet traffic growth (Wed May 23 2001 - 17:28:35 EDT)
  • Re: 10 gige experience (Fri May 11 2001 - 15:06:22 EDT)
  • Re: 10 gige experience (Thu May 10 2001 - 00:53:40 EDT)
• Franklin Lian
  • Re: RFC2547 VPN discussion group? (With an inter-AS VPN question ) (Tue May 22 2001 - 09:23:00 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 12:27:30 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 12:01:43 EDT)
• Gary E. Miller
  • RE: More demand or less supply? (Fri May 18 2001 - 16:33:27 EDT)
• Geoff Z
  • Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding (Thu May 31 2001 - 18:27:29 EDT)
• George William Herbert
  • Re: Frame-relay outage: Nolo Contendere (Tue May 29 2001 - 17:48:33 EDT)
  • Re: Tucows/OpenSRS Down (Tue May 29 2001 - 17:38:35 EDT)
• Gerry
  • Re: People who purchase unproven technologies to support their Business, and whine about it. RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND (Tue May 15 2001 - 00:08:35 EDT)
• Glen Turner
  • Re: QOS or more bandwidth (Thu May 31 2001 - 04:37:51 EDT)
• Gordon Cook
  • Re: 10 gige experience (Fri May 11 2001 - 23:21:35 EDT)
• Grace, Terry
  • Provider Experiences (Sat May 05 2001 - 22:09:32 EDT)
• Greg A. Woods
  • RE: Scanning (was Re: Stealth Blocking) (Sun May 27 2001 - 15:18:27 EDT)
  • Re: Scanning (was Re: Stealth Blocking) (Sun May 27 2001 - 02:02:24 EDT)
  • Re: Scanning (was Re: Stealth Blocking) (Sat May 26 2001 - 23:15:53 EDT)
  • Re: cleaning up MIME external-body attachments.... (Sat May 26 2001 - 13:15:29 EDT)
  • Re: Possible solution? (e-mail parcel vs. FTP) (Sat May 26 2001 - 13:00:23 EDT)
  • Re: Scanning (was Re: Stealth Blocking) (Sat May 26 2001 - 12:41:16 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 14:01:19 EDT)
  • Re: Scanning (was Re: Stealth Blocking) (Thu May 24 2001 - 14:04:02 EDT)
• Greg Maxwell
  • RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 14:03:24 EDT)
  • RE: Email Parcel Post is Good! (Tue May 29 2001 - 07:36:58 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 09:24:39 EDT)
  • Re: DSL line stealing when there is no tone - DANGER - Operational content (Wed May 16 2001 - 16:46:49 EDT)
  • Re: People who purchase unproven technologies...DSL (Mon May 14 2001 - 10:25:17 EDT)
  • Re: 10 gige experience (Thu May 10 2001 - 11:12:21 EDT)
  • Re: 10 gige experience (Thu May 10 2001 - 08:31:46 EDT)
  • Re: 10 gige experience (Thu May 10 2001 - 08:05:11 EDT)
  • Re: ISP Filter Policies--Effect is what? (Tue May 08 2001 - 15:43:45 EDT)
  • RE: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] (Mon May 07 2001 - 14:14:51 EDT)
• Hank Nussbacher
  • Anti-spoofing: is anyone doing it? (Sun May 27 2001 - 01:44:39 EDT)
  • Study cites 'Net backbone for slowing Web sites (Tue May 22 2001 - 02:28:11 EDT)
• Henry R. Linneweh
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Wed May 02 2001 - 10:12:04 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 23:46:25 EDT)
• Howard C. Berkowitz
  • RPSL and Cisco Conditional Advertisement (Fri May 04 2001 - 09:57:11 EDT)
• Hunter Pine
  • Re: Swipping /29's /30's and singles.. (Tue May 15 2001 - 10:19:21 EDT)
  • Re: 2 Wire T1 - HDLC (Mon May 14 2001 - 19:28:13 EDT)
  • Re: 2 Wire T1 - HDLC (Mon May 14 2001 - 19:22:50 EDT)
  • Re: 2 Wire T1 - HDLC (Mon May 14 2001 - 17:53:41 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 17:37:51 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 16:43:38 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 16:36:11 EDT)
  • Re: People who purchase unproven technologies to support their Business, and whine about it. RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 08:28:28 EDT)
  • Re: People who purchase unproven technologies to support their Business, and whine about it. RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 08:08:30 EDT)
  • Re: People who purchase unproven technologies to support their Business, and whine about it. RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 07:46:32 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Sun May 13 2001 - 19:35:55 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Sun May 13 2001 - 19:26:34 EDT)
• Ian Cooper
  • Re: Solaris/IIS worm hits 9000 boxes in 48 hours (Fri May 11 2001 - 16:25:43 EDT)
• Irwin Lazar
  • RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 10:51:16 EDT)
  • RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 10:15:38 EDT)
  • RE: RFC2547 VPN discussion group? (With an inter-AS VPN question ) (Tue May 22 2001 - 20:22:14 EDT)
  • MPLScon - Fall 2001 (Thu May 17 2001 - 12:53:35 EDT)
  • RE: GUI ACL Editor? (Tue May 01 2001 - 11:27:44 EDT)
• J.D. Falk
  • Re: Mitch tries to defend his open relay again (was Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning)) (Wed May 30 2001 - 23:55:42 EDT)
  • Re: Mitch tries to defend his open relay again (was Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning)) (Mon May 28 2001 - 14:21:46 EDT)
  • Mitch tries to defend his open relay again (was Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning)) (Sun May 27 2001 - 21:44:02 EDT)
  • Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning) (Sun May 27 2001 - 13:01:32 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Fri May 25 2001 - 23:24:59 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Fri May 25 2001 - 01:46:22 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 19:19:12 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 15:40:22 EDT)
  • Re: rfc 3091,3092,3098 (Fri May 18 2001 - 22:30:29 EDT)
  • Re: Abuse notification in Chinese (was:black hat .cn networks) (Wed May 09 2001 - 15:09:46 EDT)
• James Aldridge
  • Re: heads up on 80/8 [actually operational, so don't read this!!!] (Wed May 16 2001 - 11:37:08 EDT)
• James DeMong
  • GSR Route Reflector: maximum number of clients? (Tue May 01 2001 - 15:31:27 EDT)
• Jamie Norwood
  • Re: Email Parcel Post is Good! (Fri May 25 2001 - 15:04:00 EDT)
• Jan P Tietze
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 09:31:12 EDT)
• Jared Mauch
  • Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding (Thu May 31 2001 - 18:06:36 EDT)
  • Re: The DSL business model (Wed May 16 2001 - 16:27:26 EDT)
  • Re: 2 Wire T1 - HDLC (Tue May 15 2001 - 14:28:35 EDT)
  • Re: 2 Wire T1 - HDLC (Tue May 15 2001 - 14:10:18 EDT)
  • noc list fixed (Mon May 14 2001 - 15:52:36 EDT)
• Jason Lewis
  • RE: VPN Solution (WAS: ORBS (Re: Scanning)) (Mon May 28 2001 - 01:49:24 EDT)
  • RE: Political Correctness Strikes a Blow for free speech.... (Mon May 07 2001 - 19:33:47 EDT)
  • RE: XO is broken (Tue May 01 2001 - 08:03:12 EDT)
• Jason Slagle
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Fri May 25 2001 - 09:06:26 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 20:57:36 EDT)
  • RE: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 20:04:34 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 16:02:43 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 15:56:30 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 09:30:33 EDT)
  • RE: Instant chats and central servers (Wed May 09 2001 - 14:13:14 EDT)
  • RE: Instant chats and central servers (Wed May 09 2001 - 12:57:18 EDT)
  • Re: Instant chats and central servers (Tue May 08 2001 - 21:39:09 EDT)
• Jay
  • ITR and Hospitality Suite [NOOP] (Fri May 18 2001 - 16:55:36 EDT)
• Jeff Mcadams
  • Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 19:32:39 EDT)
  • Re: Frame-relay outage: Nolo Contendere (Tue May 29 2001 - 13:39:27 EDT)
  • Re: more on cable companies (Mon May 07 2001 - 22:22:13 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? (Mon May 07 2001 - 22:09:48 EDT)
  • Re: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] (Mon May 07 2001 - 17:50:40 EDT)
  • Re: HR 1542 (Sun May 06 2001 - 17:02:58 EDT)
  • Re: HR 1542 (Sat May 05 2001 - 22:26:43 EDT)
  • Re: OT - Deregulation of Data Networks (Sat May 05 2001 - 08:17:58 EDT)
• Jeff Workman
  • Re: OT - Deregulation of Data Networks (Sat May 05 2001 - 01:35:16 EDT)
• Jeffrey Wheat
  • RE: Whois -a? (Tue May 15 2001 - 10:45:26 EDT)
  • RE: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 01 2001 - 11:19:37 EDT)
• Jeremiah Kristal
  • RE: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 13:45:19 EDT)
• Jeremy Furr
  • RE: Remote Area Satellite Internet Access (Thu May 24 2001 - 08:46:34 EDT)
• Jeremy T. Bouse
  • Re: VPN Solution (WAS: ORBS (Re: Scanning)) (Mon May 28 2001 - 02:16:57 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 23:09:34 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 23:39:00 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 14:43:11 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 11:04:58 EDT)
• Jim Dixon
  • Re: Stability of the Internet? (Fri May 18 2001 - 11:24:28 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Wed May 09 2001 - 16:28:18 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Wed May 09 2001 - 03:12:29 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 13:28:30 EDT)
• Jim Mercer
  • Re: More BW, Less Taxes (Wed May 30 2001 - 07:51:36 EDT)
  • Re: More BW, Less Taxes (Wed May 30 2001 - 00:27:45 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Sun May 27 2001 - 21:43:14 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Sat May 26 2001 - 20:07:37 EDT)
  • Re: Email Parcel Post is Good! (Fri May 25 2001 - 21:14:40 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 20:55:44 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 20:46:58 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 20:38:16 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 20:27:26 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 07:02:35 EDT)
  • Re: terminal server recommendation (Tue May 01 2001 - 19:32:26 EDT)
• Joe Abley
  • Re: More BW, Less Taxes (Wed May 30 2001 - 00:15:09 EDT)
  • foreign upstarts dare to use their own languages [was: Re: black hat .cn networks] (Wed May 09 2001 - 15:59:35 EDT)
• Joe Blanchard
  • Broadband security? (Wed May 16 2001 - 06:52:50 EDT)
• Joe Lapolito
  • Re: terminal server recommendation (Tue May 01 2001 - 22:01:23 EDT)
  • Re: terminal server recommendation (Tue May 01 2001 - 20:08:56 EDT)
• Joe Marr
  • RE: Request for a clue! (Thu May 24 2001 - 16:47:56 EDT)
  • RE: People who purchase unproven technologies to support their Business, and whine about it. RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 09:33:37 EDT)
  • RE: People who purchase unproven technologies to support their Business, and whine about it. RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 09:23:33 EDT)
  • RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Sun May 13 2001 - 21:52:38 EDT)
  • People who purchase unproven technologies to support their Business, and whine about it. RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Sun May 13 2001 - 21:31:10 EDT)
• Joe McGuckin
  • Re[2]: HR 1542 (Sat May 05 2001 - 18:46:41 EDT)
• Joe Rhett
  • Re: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] (Mon May 07 2001 - 13:17:58 EDT)
• Joe Shaw
  • Re: Cisco ACL Manager(s) (Thu May 31 2001 - 14:29:13 EDT)
• Joel Jaeggli
  • Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding (Thu May 31 2001 - 21:21:19 EDT)
  • Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding (Thu May 31 2001 - 19:30:51 EDT)
• John A. Tamplin
  • RE: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 03:45:00 EDT)
  • Re: 2 Wire T1 - HDLC (Mon May 14 2001 - 20:34:50 EDT)
  • Re: 2 Wire T1 - HDLC (Mon May 14 2001 - 19:13:08 EDT)
  • Re: People who purchase unproven technologies to support their Business, and whine about it. RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND , TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 11:35:05 EDT)
• John Butler
  • Re: ICG Status (Tue May 15 2001 - 12:50:57 EDT)
  • Re: terminal server recommendation (Tue May 01 2001 - 17:27:27 EDT)
  • Re: terminal server recommendation (Tue May 01 2001 - 16:39:41 EDT)
• John Crain
  • Re: heads up on 80/8 [actually operational, so don't read this!!!] (Thu May 17 2001 - 14:05:42 EDT)
• John Fraizer
  • Re: NANOG Digest V1 #737 (Tue May 29 2001 - 15:07:56 EDT)
  • Re: Mitch tries to defend his open relay again (was Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning)) (Tue May 29 2001 - 06:28:42 EDT)
  • Re: Mitch tries to defend his open relay again (was Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning)) (Mon May 28 2001 - 16:43:08 EDT)
  • RE: ORBS (Re: Scanning) (Mon May 28 2001 - 01:44:22 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Sat May 26 2001 - 19:06:35 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 10:09:35 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 10:01:52 EDT)
  • Re: Splitting a block of Class C's (Fri May 25 2001 - 04:23:58 EDT)
  • EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 04:18:24 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 19:43:50 EDT)
  • Re: DSL line stealing when there is no tone - DANGER - Operational content (Thu May 17 2001 - 14:02:29 EDT)
  • RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 20:42:35 EDT)
  • Re: Anybody from gblx here ? (Mon May 14 2001 - 15:01:31 EDT)
  • RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 06:22:14 EDT)
  • RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 04:32:45 EDT)
  • Re: 10 gige experience (Thu May 10 2001 - 11:09:57 EDT)
  • Re: China says we started it. (Wed May 09 2001 - 12:07:30 EDT)
  • Re: ISP Filter Policies--Effect is what? (Tue May 08 2001 - 16:27:25 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 14:51:49 EDT)
  • Re: ISP Filter Policies--Effect is what? (Tue May 08 2001 - 14:43:33 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Wed May 02 2001 - 03:18:15 EDT)
  • RE: terminal server recommendation (Wed May 02 2001 - 03:14:00 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 23:21:56 EDT)
• John Hall
  • Re: Traffic generator for loadbalancer test (Thu May 10 2001 - 16:43:37 EDT)
• john heasley
  • Re: ISP Filter Policies--Effect is what? (Tue May 08 2001 - 13:28:01 EDT)
• John M . Brown
  • Re: heads up on 80/8 [actually operational, so don't read this!!!] (Wed May 16 2001 - 11:00:24 EDT)
  • Re: heads up on 80/8 [actually operational, so don't read this!!!] (Wed May 16 2001 - 11:28:56 EDT)
  • Re: heads up on 80/8 [actually operational, so don't read this!!!] (Wed May 16 2001 - 11:32:32 EDT)
• John Murphy
  • RE: Whois -a? (Tue May 15 2001 - 09:20:45 EDT)
  • RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 16:52:35 EDT)
  • RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 06:57:48 EDT)
  • RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Sun May 13 2001 - 23:07:26 EDT)
• John Palmer (NANOG Acct)
  • NEW GROUP FORMED FOR UNOFFICIAL INTERNET TLD OWNERS (Wed May 23 2001 - 13:10:11 EDT)
  • Dont Knock The Technology, was Re: People who purchase unproven technologies to support theirBusiness, and whine about it. (Mon May 14 2001 - 14:00:15 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Sun May 13 2001 - 20:28:26 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Sun May 13 2001 - 19:18:52 EDT)
  • To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Sun May 13 2001 - 16:40:28 EDT)
• John Payne
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 13:15:28 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 11:36:06 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 07:48:52 EDT)
  • Re: Whois -a? (Tue May 15 2001 - 12:26:05 EDT)
  • Re: People who purchase unproven technologies to support their Business, and whine about it. RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 09:09:15 EDT)
  • Re: People who purchase unproven technologies to support their Business, and whine about it. RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 08:24:30 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? (Mon May 07 2001 - 01:57:58 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? (Sat May 05 2001 - 23:21:03 EDT)
• John Starta
  • RE: Remote Area Satellite Internet Access (Thu May 24 2001 - 12:47:11 EDT)
• Jon Mansey
  • Layer4 Re: VPN Solution (WAS: ORBS (Re: Scanning)) (Mon May 28 2001 - 10:37:00 EDT)
• Jonathan Disher
  • Re: experience with BGP on Extreme's Alpine (Wed May 30 2001 - 19:20:07 EDT)
  • Re: Carrier Circus (was RE: Intermedia (ICIX) brokenness...) (Fri May 04 2001 - 15:18:18 EDT)
• Joseph McDonald
  • RE: OT - Deregulation of Data Networks (Sat May 05 2001 - 12:23:54 EDT)
• Joseph T. Klein
  • Re: Scanning (was Re: Stealth Blocking) (Thu May 24 2001 - 10:16:12 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? (Mon May 07 2001 - 13:51:03 EDT)
  • RE: HR 1542 (Mon May 07 2001 - 12:54:30 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? (Sun May 06 2001 - 14:31:34 EDT)
  • Re: HR 1542 (Sat May 05 2001 - 17:46:22 EDT)
  • HR 1542 (Sat May 05 2001 - 15:19:03 EDT)
• Josh Richards
  • Re: Broadband security? (Wed May 16 2001 - 19:08:30 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Sun May 13 2001 - 18:29:03 EDT)
• Joshua Goodall
  • Re: Acceptable limits of latency (Sun May 27 2001 - 05:06:53 EDT)
• just me.
  • Re: terminal server recommendation (Tue May 01 2001 - 21:42:26 EDT)
  • Re: terminal server recommendation (Tue May 01 2001 - 21:39:12 EDT)
  • Re: terminal server recommendation (Tue May 01 2001 - 17:56:50 EDT)
• Justin Hinderliter
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 18:13:03 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 17:50:08 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 16:59:43 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Mon May 07 2001 - 15:39:08 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Mon May 07 2001 - 15:10:19 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Mon May 07 2001 - 13:41:29 EDT)
• k claffy
  • Re: bgp table history wanted (Sat May 19 2001 - 20:06:00 EDT)
  • full paper up for one of the nanog DOS talks on monday (Fri May 18 2001 - 18:43:21 EDT)
  • possibly operationally relevant tutorials at sigcomm (ATT research) (Wed May 09 2001 - 18:23:18 EDT)
• Kai Schlichting
  • Re: NANOG Digest V1 #737 (Tue May 29 2001 - 11:02:28 EDT)
  • mobile.att.net MX meltdown (Fri May 18 2001 - 13:59:06 EDT)
• Kavi, Prabhu
  • RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 15:30:00 EDT)
  • RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 15:11:57 EDT)
  • RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 13:40:58 EDT)
  • RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 13:30:55 EDT)
• Kelly J. Cooper
  • ISP Information Sharing & Analysis Center (Thu May 31 2001 - 19:36:58 EDT)
• ken harris.
  • Re: Stability of the Internet? (Fri May 18 2001 - 11:31:41 EDT)
  • RE: Instant chats and central servers (Wed May 09 2001 - 17:33:05 EDT)
  • RE: Instant chats and central servers (Wed May 09 2001 - 17:13:29 EDT)
  • RE: Instant chats and central servers (Tue May 08 2001 - 23:15:43 EDT)
  • Re: Instant chats and central servers (Tue May 08 2001 - 20:57:54 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 21:35:38 EDT)
• Kevin Gannon
  • Re: Instant chats and central servers (Tue May 08 2001 - 16:27:09 EDT)
  • Re: ISP Filter Policies--Effect is what? (Tue May 08 2001 - 12:24:53 EDT)
• kevin graham
  • Looking for a provider.. (Wed May 02 2001 - 16:23:50 EDT)
• Kevin Loch
  • Re: Stability of the Internet? (Fri May 18 2001 - 14:22:00 EDT)
• Kevin Oberman
  • Re: More demand or less supply? (Fri May 18 2001 - 11:12:03 EDT)
  • Re: foreign upstarts dare to use their own languages [was: Re: black hat .cn networks] (Wed May 09 2001 - 19:44:40 EDT)
• Lane Patterson
  • RE: jumbo frames (Thu May 31 2001 - 16:47:22 EDT)
• Lee Watterworth
  • PSI, CAIS, etc.. (Mon May 14 2001 - 08:28:31 EDT)
• Los, Ralph
  • Wrap-up of the Yipes! query.. (Wed May 30 2001 - 17:03:41 EDT)
  • Yipes!....question. (Thu May 24 2001 - 12:00:51 EDT)
• M. David Leonard
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 07:55:17 EDT)
  • RE: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] (Mon May 07 2001 - 16:46:37 EDT)
• Majdi S. Abbas
  • Re: ICG Status (Tue May 15 2001 - 17:07:57 EDT)
  • Re: Political Correctness Strikes a Blow for free speech.... (Mon May 07 2001 - 19:18:49 EDT)
  • Re: Carrier Circus (was RE: Intermedia (ICIX) brokenness...) (Fri May 04 2001 - 22:49:17 EDT)
• Marc MERLIN
  • Re: Political Correctness Strikes a Blow for free speech.... (Wed May 09 2001 - 13:56:47 EDT)
• Margie Arbon
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 18:47:59 EDT)
• Marius Strom
  • Knowledgable Excite.com Contact (Wed May 30 2001 - 10:44:57 EDT)
• Mark Radabaugh - Amplex
  • RE: rfc 3091,3092,3098 (Fri May 18 2001 - 21:56:20 EDT)
  • Clued ISP in/around Detroit (Wed May 09 2001 - 11:31:33 EDT)
• Marko Karppinen
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 11:06:06 EDT)
• Marshall Eubanks
  • Re: [zoc-0635624] [uunet-395213]: Not to be alarmist, but is there aknown problem in San Diego? (Tue May 29 2001 - 10:04:50 EDT)
  • Re: [zoc-0635624] [uunet-395213]: Not to be alarmist, but is there aknown problem in San Diego? (Tue May 29 2001 - 09:47:13 EDT)
  • vBNS MSDP (Tue May 08 2001 - 23:43:43 EDT)
• Martin, Christian
  • RE: 2 Wire T1 - HDLC (Tue May 15 2001 - 01:07:10 EDT)
  • RE: terminal server recommendation (Tue May 01 2001 - 23:53:29 EDT)
  • RE: terminal server recommendation (Tue May 01 2001 - 19:33:25 EDT)
  • RE: terminal server recommendation (Tue May 01 2001 - 19:25:01 EDT)
• Masataka Ohta
  • Re: Acceptable limits of latency (Sat May 26 2001 - 07:34:35 EDT)
  • Re: Abuse notification in Chinese (was:black hat .cn networks) (Wed May 09 2001 - 20:49:07 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 14:25:59 EDT)
• Mathias Koerber
  • RE: Whois -a? (Tue May 15 2001 - 10:18:27 EDT)
• Matt Cramer
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 15:56:18 EDT)
• Matt Levine
  • RE: Splitting a block of Class C's (Fri May 25 2001 - 03:01:25 EDT)
  • RE: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 18:14:43 EDT)
• Matt Martini
  • Re: Possible solution? (e-mail parcel vs. FTP) (Sat May 26 2001 - 11:51:39 EDT)
• Matthew J. Zito
  • Re: Tucows/OpenSRS Down (Tue May 29 2001 - 11:19:47 EDT)
• Micah McNelly
  • rfc 3091,3092,3098 (Fri May 18 2001 - 21:52:39 EDT)
• Michael C . Wu
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Fri May 11 2001 - 11:08:48 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Wed May 02 2001 - 00:24:20 EDT)
• Michael Martin
  • Re: experience with BGP on Extreme's Alpine (Wed May 30 2001 - 22:17:33 EDT)
• Mikael Abrahamsson
  • RE: jumbo frames (Thu May 31 2001 - 16:58:12 EDT)
  • Re: last mile capacity [was Re: QOS or more bandwidth] (Tue May 29 2001 - 13:42:49 EDT)
  • Re: graphical display of routes (Thu May 03 2001 - 11:08:59 EDT)
  • graphical display of routes (Thu May 03 2001 - 08:23:11 EDT)
• Mike Batchelor
  • RE: Stealth Blocking (Fri May 25 2001 - 19:04:20 EDT)
  • RE: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 19:04:01 EDT)
  • RE: Stability of the Internet? (Fri May 18 2001 - 19:22:27 EDT)
  • RE: Traffic generator for loadbalancer test (Thu May 10 2001 - 19:29:04 EDT)
• mike harrison
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Sat May 26 2001 - 11:11:27 EDT)
  • Re: Stability of the Internet? (Fri May 18 2001 - 23:31:00 EDT)
  • Re: Whois -a? (Tue May 15 2001 - 10:10:13 EDT)
  • Re: 2 Wire T1 - HDLC (Tue May 15 2001 - 06:48:04 EDT)
  • Re: Swipping /29's /30's and singles.. (Mon May 14 2001 - 22:24:46 EDT)
  • 2 Wire T1 - HDLC (Mon May 14 2001 - 17:41:01 EDT)
  • Re: People who purchase unproven technologies... (Mon May 14 2001 - 09:50:49 EDT)
  • Re: People who purchase unproven technologies to support their Business, and whine about it. RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 08:06:57 EDT)
  • Re: People who purchase unproven technologies...DSL (Mon May 14 2001 - 07:53:50 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 16:26:05 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 21:36:38 EDT)
• Mike Leber
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 01:59:56 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Sun May 13 2001 - 23:33:05 EDT)
  • Re: Connectivity from 60 Hudson to NYIIX (Fri May 11 2001 - 00:25:44 EDT)
  • Re: 10 gige experience (Wed May 09 2001 - 19:14:37 EDT)
  • 10 gige experience (Wed May 09 2001 - 17:03:49 EDT)
  • RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? (Tue May 08 2001 - 01:46:29 EDT)
• Miles Fidelman
  • finding POPs (Wed May 23 2001 - 16:15:44 EDT)
  • Re: more on cable companies (Mon May 07 2001 - 21:30:36 EDT)
  • RE: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] (Mon May 07 2001 - 18:13:32 EDT)
  • Re: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] (Mon May 07 2001 - 16:55:35 EDT)
  • Re: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] (Mon May 07 2001 - 12:36:46 EDT)
• Mitch Halmu
  • Re: Mitch tries to defend his open relay again (was Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning)) (Wed May 30 2001 - 22:16:50 EDT)
  • Re: Mitch tries to defend his open relay again (was Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning)) (Tue May 29 2001 - 03:58:25 EDT)
  • Re: Mitch tries to defend his open relay again (was Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning)) (Mon May 28 2001 - 04:36:38 EDT)
  • RE: ORBS (Re: Scanning) (Mon May 28 2001 - 03:11:34 EDT)
  • RE: ORBS (Re: Scanning) (Sun May 27 2001 - 21:18:15 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Sun May 27 2001 - 19:48:41 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Sat May 26 2001 - 19:23:16 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Sat May 26 2001 - 16:36:31 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Sat May 26 2001 - 15:46:56 EDT)
  • Re: ot, nonoperational: Mitch Halmu (Sat May 26 2001 - 15:18:58 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Sat May 26 2001 - 10:48:48 EDT)
  • Re: Email Parcel Post is Good! (Fri May 25 2001 - 18:48:11 EDT)
  • RE: Stealth Blocking (Fri May 25 2001 - 14:56:42 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 12:49:56 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 11:46:12 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 06:32:48 EDT)
  • Re: "Big Red" (Thu May 24 2001 - 21:45:53 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 17:47:41 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 17:00:09 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 15:12:49 EDT)
  • Re: Scanning (was Re: Stealth Blocking) (Thu May 24 2001 - 14:54:36 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 14:05:16 EDT)
  • Re: Why are you all still here? (Was Re: Stealth Blocking) (Thu May 24 2001 - 11:53:04 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 22:38:11 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 18:39:53 EDT)
  • RE: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 15:15:06 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 13:00:50 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 12:41:52 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 10:33:11 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 02:44:28 EDT)
• Murphy, Brennan
  • RE: PSI, CAIS, etc.. (Mon May 14 2001 - 11:59:36 EDT)
  • RE: ISP Filter Policies--Follow Up--Verio Verification (Thu May 10 2001 - 15:18:56 EDT)
  • RE: ISP Filter Policies--Effect is what? (Tue May 08 2001 - 15:20:31 EDT)
  • RE: ISP Filter Policies--Effect is what? (Tue May 08 2001 - 15:11:42 EDT)
  • ISP Filter Policies--Effect is what? (Tue May 08 2001 - 12:06:37 EDT)
• Nathan Stratton
  • Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 18:16:43 EDT)
  • Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 18:13:30 EDT)
  • Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 15:39:40 EDT)
  • Re: Network Simulation and Measurement Software (Wed May 09 2001 - 17:18:20 EDT)
• neil d. quiogue
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 06:29:09 EDT)
• Neil J. McRae
  • Re: Cisco DS3 performance specifications (Tue May 08 2001 - 11:45:18 EDT)
• Nipper, Arnold
  • Re: 10 gige experience (Fri May 11 2001 - 14:10:40 EDT)
• Omachonu Ogali
  • Re: Query: What policies do backbone providers use to determine IP ownership? (Fri May 25 2001 - 08:47:08 EDT)
  • Re: IS anyone else seeing this. Aliitle more info. (Fri May 18 2001 - 17:11:21 EDT)
  • Sorry (Tue May 08 2001 - 14:48:04 EDT)
  • RE: NYC Colo (Tue May 08 2001 - 14:47:23 EDT)
• Owen DeLong
  • RE: ORBS (Re: Scanning) (Sun May 27 2001 - 21:58:24 EDT)
  • RE: E-mail vs. FTP -- ***RTF RFC*** (Sun May 27 2001 - 10:18:21 EDT)
  • Re: PacBell Frame Relay Outage? (Sat May 26 2001 - 10:02:49 EDT)
  • RE: Email Parcel Post is Good! (Fri May 25 2001 - 21:45:53 EDT)
  • Re: Email Parcel Post is Good! (Fri May 25 2001 - 12:29:00 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? (Mon May 07 2001 - 13:35:46 EDT)
• Pat Myrto
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 01 2001 - 15:16:13 EDT)
• Patrick Evans
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 10:59:55 EDT)
• Patrick Greenwell
  • Re: Stability of the Internet? (Sat May 19 2001 - 12:27:26 EDT)
  • in-addr survey? (Fri May 11 2001 - 17:08:18 EDT)
• Patrick W. Gilmore
  • VPN Solution (WAS: ORBS (Re: Scanning)) (Mon May 28 2001 - 01:24:58 EDT)
  • RE: ORBS (Re: Scanning) (Sun May 27 2001 - 14:55:20 EDT)
  • RE: ORBS (Re: Scanning) (Sun May 27 2001 - 14:27:03 EDT)
• Paul G. Donner
  • Re: Traffic per Prefix Length (Fri May 04 2001 - 15:52:51 EDT)
  • Traffic per Prefix Length (Thu May 03 2001 - 21:09:24 EDT)
• Paul Lantinga
  • RE: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 09:59:15 EDT)
  • RE: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 01:39:08 EDT)
• Paul Vixie
  • Re: network policy (was Re: Stealth Blocking) (Sat May 26 2001 - 23:07:39 EDT)
  • network policy (was Re: Stealth Blocking) (Fri May 25 2001 - 13:58:17 EDT)
  • Re: Scanning (was Re: Stealth Blocking) (Thu May 24 2001 - 14:23:12 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 14:35:38 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? (Tue May 08 2001 - 02:19:27 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? (Mon May 07 2001 - 12:37:10 EDT)
  • Re: terminal server recommendation (Tue May 01 2001 - 17:53:00 EDT)
• Pete Ehlke
  • Re: California ISO announces new notification service (Tue May 01 2001 - 12:52:58 EDT)
• Pete Kruckenberg
  • RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 19:08:50 EDT)
  • Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 16:23:09 EDT)
  • RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 16:07:25 EDT)
  • RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 15:19:59 EDT)
  • RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 15:14:32 EDT)
  • RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 12:10:21 EDT)
  • RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 11:19:05 EDT)
  • Re: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 10:44:19 EDT)
• Peter Galbavy
  • Re: Using BGP as a policy tool (was Re: in-addr survey) (Tue May 15 2001 - 08:55:17 EDT)
• Peter van Dijk
  • Re: Whois -a? (Tue May 15 2001 - 09:35:37 EDT)
  • Re: foreign upstarts dare to use their own languages [was: Re: black hat .cn networks] (Thu May 10 2001 - 03:15:13 EDT)
  • Re: Instant chats and central servers (Tue May 08 2001 - 14:50:29 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? (Mon May 07 2001 - 17:55:29 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? (Mon May 07 2001 - 12:45:13 EDT)
• Petri Stephen
  • RE: Solaris/IIS worm hits 9000 boxes in 48 hours (Fri May 11 2001 - 17:07:29 EDT)
  • Solaris/IIS worm hits 9000 boxes in 48 hours (Fri May 11 2001 - 16:14:20 EDT)
  • Sadmind/IIS Worm Defaces IIS Websites via Solaris. (Thu May 10 2001 - 10:27:57 EDT)
• Philip Smith
  • Re: heads up on 80/8 [actually operational, so don't read this!!!] (Thu May 17 2001 - 08:14:07 EDT)
• poptix
  • Re: Instant chats and central servers (Tue May 08 2001 - 16:11:07 EDT)
• Pyda Srisuresh
  • RE: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Tue May 15 2001 - 13:41:10 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Tue May 15 2001 - 12:02:34 EDT)
• Rafi Sadowsky
  • Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 16:26:17 EDT)
  • Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidthy (Tue May 29 2001 - 16:18:44 EDT)
  • Korea contact info: [Re: black hat .cn networks] (Tue May 01 2001 - 17:34:04 EDT)
• Randy Bush
  • Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 18:52:09 EDT)
  • Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning) (Sun May 27 2001 - 11:57:30 EDT)
  • Re: Acceptable limits of latency (Fri May 25 2001 - 22:33:34 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 17:17:25 EDT)
  • Re: bgp table history wanted (Sat May 19 2001 - 23:30:05 EDT)
  • bgp table history wanted (Sat May 19 2001 - 19:25:43 EDT)
  • Re: heads up on 80/8 [actually operational, so don't read this!!!] (Thu May 17 2001 - 10:04:05 EDT)
  • Re: To CAIS Engineers - WAKE UP AND TAKE CARE OF YOUR CUSTOMERS (Mon May 14 2001 - 05:41:31 EDT)
  • Re: black hat .cn networks (Wed May 09 2001 - 12:50:06 EDT)
  • RE: black hat .cn networks (Tue May 08 2001 - 06:08:52 EDT)
• Randy Neals
  • Connectivity from 60 Hudson to NYIIX (Thu May 10 2001 - 21:22:40 EDT)
• Raul Hixie
  • RE: Stealth Blocking (Fri May 25 2001 - 16:37:02 EDT)
  • Punch and Pie (Fri May 25 2001 - 14:13:27 EDT)
• Raymond Medeiros
  • Visio == Internet prayer wheel? (Fri May 18 2001 - 19:12:51 EDT)
• Reid Knuttila
  • Next-hop Reachability on ATM NAPs (Mon May 14 2001 - 17:24:09 EDT)
  • Next-hop Reachability on ATM NAPs (Mon May 14 2001 - 17:22:17 EDT)
• Rich Fulton
  • Re: bgp table history wanted (Sat May 19 2001 - 20:29:49 EDT)
• Richard A. Steenbergen
  • Re: jumbo frames (Wed May 30 2001 - 18:05:15 EDT)
  • Re: jumbo frames (Wed May 30 2001 - 17:50:19 EDT)
  • Re: jumbo frames (Wed May 30 2001 - 15:15:20 EDT)
  • Re: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 19:57:31 EDT)
  • Re: PacBell Frame Relay Outage? (Fri May 25 2001 - 18:35:58 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Thu May 24 2001 - 20:38:48 EDT)
  • RE: Query: What policies do backbone providers use to determine IP ownership (Thu May 24 2001 - 13:32:23 EDT)
  • Re: Stealth Blocking (Wed May 23 2001 - 21:49:35 EDT)
  • Re: RFC2547 VPN discussion group? (With an inter-AS VPN question ) (Tue May 22 2001 - 12:44:42 EDT)
  • Re: IS anyone else seeing this. Aliitle more info. (Fri May 18 2001 - 18:03:39 EDT)
  • Re: IS anyone else seeing this. Aliitle more info. (Fri May 18 2001 - 17:34:44 EDT)
  • Re: Whois -a? (Tue May 15 2001 - 16:12:40 EDT)
  • Re: 10 gige experience (Thu May 10 2001 - 14:20:10 EDT)
  • RE: 10 gige experience (Wed May 09 2001 - 20:00:11 EDT)
  • Re: 10 gige experience (Wed May 09 2001 - 18:13:56 EDT)
  • Re: Network Simulation and Measurement Software (Wed May 09 2001 - 17:55:57 EDT)
  • RE: Instant chats and central servers (Wed May 09 2001 - 16:11:13 EDT)
  • RE: Instant chats and central servers (Wed May 09 2001 - 15:20:44 EDT)
  • Re: Looking for BGP resource utilization information... (Mon May 07 2001 - 13:57:53 EDT)
  • Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? (Sun May 06 2001 - 01:08:12 EDT)
  • Re: Carrier Circus (was RE: Intermedia (ICIX) brokenness...) (Fri May 04 2001 - 15:47:09 EDT)
• Richard Jimmerson
  • RE: ARIN, and reservations? (Thu May 17 2001 - 15:18:21 EDT)
  • RE: ARIN, and reservations? (Thu May 17 2001 - 12:21:04 EDT)
• Richard Jones
  • Real use of VPN (Wed May 30 2001 - 07:36:25 EDT)
• Richard Welty
  • Re: Stability of the Internet? (Fri May 18 2001 - 11:23:28 EDT)
• RIPE NCC Staff
  • 80/8, 81/8 Allocated to the RIPE NCC (Fri May 18 2001 - 08:27:12 EDT)
  • 80/8, 81/8 Allocated to the RIPE NCC (Fri May 18 2001 - 08:18:44 EDT)
• RJ Atkinson
  • RE: jumbo frames (Thu May 31 2001 - 17:43:40 EDT)
  • RE: jumbo frames (Thu May 31 2001 - 17:40:50 EDT)
  • Re: last mile capacity [was Re: QOS or more bandwidth] (Tue May 29 2001 - 14:11:03 EDT)
  • Re: More BW, Less Taxes (Tue May 29 2001 - 14:01:54 EDT)
  • Re: last mile capacity (Tue May 29 2001 - 13:50:47 EDT)
  • RE: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 13:22:17 EDT)
  • Re: QOS or more bandwidth (Tue May 29 2001 - 13:16:22 EDT)
  • Re: Northern VA CATV systems (Wed May 09 2001 - 13:24:08 EDT)
  • Re: Northern VA CATV systems (Wed May 09 2001 - 10:39:06 EDT)
  • more on cable companies (Mon May 07 2001 - 20:34:23 EDT)
  • Northern VA CATV systems (Mon May 07 2001 - 20:28:08 EDT)
• Robert A. Hayden
  • Cisco ACL Manager(s) (Thu May 31 2001 - 14:10:19 EDT)
  • Re: experience with BGP on Extreme's Alpine (Wed May 30 2001 - 19:33:08 EDT)
• Robert Blayzor
  • RE: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 13:11:31 EDT)
  • RE: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 11:50:15 EDT)
  • RE: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 11:45:13 EDT)
  • RE: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 11:30:59 EDT)
  • RE: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 11:20:28 EDT)
  • RE: EMAIL != FTP (Fri May 25 2001 - 08:39:02 EDT)
• Robert E. Seastrom
  • Re: QOS or more bandwidth&nbs