Nanog 0103
By Author

1049 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
About this archive
Other mail archives

Starting: Thu Mar 01 2001 - 00:08:37 EST
Ending: Sat Mar 31 2001 - 23:24:43 EST

• (no email)
  • Re: PPPoE server software? (Sat Mar 31 2001 - 12:32:08 EST)
  • any non-bgp challenged engineer from Digital Island? (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 17:06:06 EST)
  • Re: Sprint hosed...routing breakdown in Chicago (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 17:20:18 EST)
  • Sprint hosed...routing breakdown in Chicago (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 16:36:53 EST)
  • Re: Real world Anti-DDOS attack practice. (Fri Mar 23 2001 - 08:25:22 EST)
  • RE: AOL holes again. (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 17:29:48 EST)
  • Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 17:36:14 EST)
  • Re: DNS is like radio frequencies (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 09:04:30 EST)
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 10:00:20 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 09:57:24 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 21:46:34 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 02:56:56 EST)
  • Re: NetSol Host Changes, NetSol Problems (Sat Mar 10 2001 - 06:19:24 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Sat Mar 10 2001 - 05:43:02 EST)
  • Re: Namespace conflicts (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 10:19:20 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 01:35:55 EST)
  • Re: Covad SUCKS! (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 16:59:39 EST)
  • PSI free peering (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 10:43:08 EST)
• (no name)
  • Re: InterNAP (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 17:49:17 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 11:00:10 EST)
  • Re: dsl providers that will route /24 (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 18:20:14 EST)
  • Re: dsl providers that will route /24 (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 23:10:17 EST)
  • Re: Clear Channel on a T1 (Fri Mar 23 2001 - 16:11:29 EST)
  • Re: Clear Channel on a T1 (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 13:27:51 EST)
  • Clear Channel on a T1 (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 13:02:33 EST)
  • Re: EP.net Issues (Wed Mar 21 2001 - 17:07:33 EST)
  • Re: EP.net Issues (Wed Mar 21 2001 - 17:05:41 EST)
  • Re: EP.net Issues (Wed Mar 21 2001 - 15:31:55 EST)
  • Re: AOL holes again. (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 18:47:31 EST)
  • Re: FTP exploit? (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 16:22:17 EST)
  • Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 23:36:24 EST)
  • Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Sat Mar 17 2001 - 00:20:13 EST)
  • Re: Search Engine Accountability (was RE: Reality Check) (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 15:03:50 EST)
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 09:48:03 EST)
  • Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 17:02:31 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 12:57:24 EST)
  • (Seriously Off Topic) Inadvertent names (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 12:20:49 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 09:57:01 EST)
  • RE: DECNet over IP? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 17:27:14 EST)
  • Re: DECNet over IP? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 13:20:09 EST)
  • Re: DECNet over IP? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 12:24:57 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 03:54:28 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 17:03:58 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 16:14:06 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 15:49:44 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 15:26:28 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 15:03:04 EST)
  • Prefix length filtering at the ISP-ISP edge (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 08:38:40 EST)
  • Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 18:49:39 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 10:28:36 EST)
  • Re: new.net (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 10:26:17 EST)
  • Re: UUNet/Chicago (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 17:07:34 EST)
  • Re: mail.yahoo.com, "missing A records" and squid proxy (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 10:31:48 EST)
  • Re: new.net (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 17:59:06 EST)
  • Re: new.net (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 17:05:50 EST)
  • Re: new.net (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 16:46:10 EST)
  • Re: Sprint Problem (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 15:34:31 EST)
  • Re: Loose Source Routing (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 00:44:25 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 23:26:36 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 19:45:03 EST)
  • Re: Loose Source Routing (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 19:38:56 EST)
  • Re: Loose Source Routing (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 19:10:15 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 15:13:39 EST)
  • Re: Network Sizing Guidelines? (Sun Mar 04 2001 - 00:07:36 EST)
  • (no subject) (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 11:21:41 EST)
  • MAE West ATM (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 11:14:39 EST)
• Aaron Hopkins
  • Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 23:46:55 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 03:20:09 EST)
• Aaron L. Meehan
  • Re: Namespace conflicts (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 18:07:54 EST)
  • Re: NetSol Host Changes, NetSol Problems (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 18:47:56 EST)
• Adam McKenna
  • Re: Broken Internet? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 13:01:24 EST)
  • Re: Broken Internet? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 04:30:49 EST)
  • Re: Broken Internet? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 04:26:24 EST)
  • Re: Broken Internet? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 03:18:56 EST)
• Adam Rothschild
  • Re: Broken Internet? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 14:22:52 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 13:37:18 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 02:43:43 EST)
  • Re: Broken Internet? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 18:20:17 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 12:58:54 EST)
• Adrian Chadd
  • Re: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 05:00:07 EST)
  • Re: dsl providers that will route /24 (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 06:18:36 EST)
  • Re: Content Injection Appliance (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 04:46:02 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 04:13:45 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 05:31:34 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 14:27:59 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 05:17:35 EST)
• Akio Sugeno
  • Re: Statistics for Public Peering Points (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 00:17:57 EST)
• Alan Clegg
  • Re: verizon paging modem numbers (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 13:14:24 EST)
  • Re: AOL holes again. (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 17:57:02 EST)
  • Re: AOL holes again. (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 13:18:36 EST)
  • AOL holes again. (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 12:43:31 EST)
• Alan Hannan
  • Re: Loose Source Routing (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 04:22:25 EST)
  • Re: Loose Source Routing (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 15:41:56 EST)
  • Re: Next NANOG (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 11:24:01 EST)
• Alec H. Peterson
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 15:02:30 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 13:00:38 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 12:15:12 EST)
• Aleksi Suhonen
  • The Mandatory One Reply To This Weeks: The Cidr Report (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 04:46:19 EST)
• Alex
  • Re: Does peering at an ATM MAE require a router that does ABR? (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 04:26:50 EST)
  • Re: Does peering at an ATM MAE require a router that does ABR? (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 04:25:50 EST)
  • Re: Does peering at an ATM MAE require a router that does ABR? (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 17:11:39 EST)
• Alex Kamantauskas
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 12:54:58 EST)
• Alex Rubenstein
  • Re: dsl providers that will route /24 (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 02:21:03 EST)
  • Re: dsl providers that will route /24 (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 01:57:17 EST)
• Andrea Abrahamsen
  • Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 12:06:27 EST)
  • Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 18:31:25 EST)
• Andrew Partan
  • Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 17:22:41 EST)
• Andy
  • Re: Metro area fiber market issues - May 2001 Cook Report contents (Sat Mar 17 2001 - 00:06:43 EST)
• Andy Ellifson
  • NetSol Host Changes, NetSol Problems (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 11:39:56 EST)
• Ankur Goyal
  • BGP deployment (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 22:58:39 EST)
• Anne Marcel
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 20:15:53 EST)
• Ariel Biener
  • Re: Looking Glass Code (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 20:14:36 EST)
  • Re: Next NANOG (really off topic) (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 04:26:44 EST)
• Arnd Vehling
  • Re: using ARIN assigned address in Asia (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 03:05:11 EST)
  • Re: Linux clusters? (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 04:19:28 EST)
• Arnold Nipper
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 18:05:51 EST)
• Avleen Vig
  • Re: DECNet over IP? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 12:16:08 EST)
• Barrows, Jeff
  • SWM ISO empirical operational data... (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 12:02:32 EST)
• Basil Kruglov
  • Re: Real world Anti-DDOS attack practice. (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 21:05:59 EST)
• Ben Beuchler
  • Re: FTP exploit? (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 16:15:23 EST)
• Ben Browning
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 23:38:01 EST)
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 13:55:17 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 03:08:42 EST)
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 02:54:48 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 13:15:40 EST)
  • Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 05:05:41 EST)
  • Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 22:04:05 EST)
  • Linux clusters? (Mon Mar 05 2001 - 22:58:50 EST)
• bera badsa
  • for network monkeys (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 18:28:12 EST)
• Berger, Gary
  • BGP listserv (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 12:03:58 EST)
• bert hubert
  • Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 19:40:27 EST)
  • DNS is like radio frequencies (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 19:32:47 EST)
  • Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 18:35:08 EST)
  • Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 17:25:35 EST)
  • Re: DNS - Bind database / dns directly on a database (Sun Mar 11 2001 - 14:34:15 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 18:59:29 EST)
• Bill Nickless
  • RE: MBone access (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 17:22:15 EST)
  • Re: MBone access (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 17:18:08 EST)
• Bill Woodcock
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 11:53:08 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 02:56:55 EST)
  • Re: DSL backhaul provisioning (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 23:09:30 EST)
• Bob Bownes
  • Geomagnetic Disturbance Was: Re: Microwave (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 14:49:06 EST)
  • Re: Microwave... (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 19:21:10 EST)
  • Re: Microwave... (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 19:10:27 EST)
  • Re: Namespaces (was: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play) (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 20:33:18 EST)
  • Namespace conflicts (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 17:51:30 EST)
• Bora Akyol
  • Re: California PUC orders outage notification (Sat Mar 31 2001 - 01:06:41 EST)
• Brad Verd
  • gTLD Informational Message (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 19:19:14 EST)
  • gTLD Informational Message (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 14:03:11 EST)
  • gTLD Informational Message (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 17:25:05 EST)
  • gTLD Informational Message (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 03:05:50 EST)
• BrandonButterworth
  • RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 18:26:36 EST)
  • RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 18:08:12 EST)
• Brent Sweeny
  • Re: MBone access (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 18:22:22 EST)
  • Re: MBone access (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 17:29:23 EST)
• Brett Frankenberger
  • Re: Clear Channel on a T1 (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 14:08:55 EST)
  • Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 00:56:03 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 17:19:01 EST)
• Brian
  • Re: BGP deployment (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 01:22:26 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 11:59:48 EST)
  • Re: Linux clusters? (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 00:35:15 EST)
  • Re: Covad SUCKS! (Sun Mar 04 2001 - 20:27:23 EST)
• Brian Russo
  • Re: Would anyone be interested (SQL/Bind) (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 09:50:19 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 00:44:56 EST)
• Brian Wallingford
  • Re: OUTAGE: network shutdown (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 12:56:47 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 11:30:21 EST)
• Bruce Campbell
  • Re: using ARIN assigned address in Asia (Wed Mar 21 2001 - 16:58:17 EST)
• Bryan Bradsby
  • Re: PRESS RELEASE: TCH.ORG Expands Internet Naming with New Top Level Domain Names (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 08:55:34 EST)
• Bryan C. Andregg
  • Re: Namespace conflicts (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 10:02:28 EST)
• Carlos Heller
  • Re: .mn.rr.com dns possibly hacked? (Sat Mar 10 2001 - 19:37:06 EST)
• Carol Wadsworth
  • NANOG 22 -- Registration Open (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 16:52:08 EST)
  • NANOG 22 Hotel Information (Fri Mar 23 2001 - 17:14:13 EST)
• Casassa, Nathan
  • @HOME AS6172 Problems (Sat Mar 03 2001 - 17:09:32 EST)
• Charles Scott
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 10:03:34 EST)
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 14:56:25 EST)
  • Re: new.net (Sat Mar 10 2001 - 08:45:39 EST)
  • RE: new.net (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 15:18:03 EST)
  • Re: Namespace conflicts (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 10:46:51 EST)
  • Re: Namespaces (was: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play) (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 08:07:06 EST)
• Charles Smith
  • FW: Next Hop Attribute (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 09:28:55 EST)
• Charles Sprickman
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 01:44:20 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 22:14:29 EST)
  • Re: OT: verizon paging modem numbers (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 13:15:01 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 01:34:33 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 16:04:17 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 13:18:10 EST)
• Chip Rosenthal
  • Re: Northpoint is toast (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 21:44:37 EST)
• Chris Beggy
  • tcp,guardent,bellovin (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 09:43:05 EST)
  • Re: Covad SUCKS! (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 05:15:26 EST)
• Chris Davis
  • Multiple Roots simply need context (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 15:23:34 EST)
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 17:34:53 EST)
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 09:57:13 EST)
  • I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 15:22:33 EST)
• Chris Gibiault
  • RE: using ARIN assigned address in Asia (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 05:06:57 EST)
• Christian Kuhtz
  • RE: Clear Channel on a T1 (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 14:59:56 EST)
• Christian Nielsen
  • Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 02:17:40 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 19:07:26 EST)
• Christopher A. Woodfield
  • Re: Clear Channel on a T1 (Fri Mar 23 2001 - 13:45:15 EST)
  • Re: Looking for Brooks Fiber contact (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 11:33:27 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 11:17:54 EST)
• Christopher Ambler
  • Re: Geomagnetic Disturbance Was: Re: Microwave (Sat Mar 31 2001 - 04:22:59 EST)
• Clayton Fiske
  • Re: Real world Anti-DDOS attack practice. (Fri Mar 23 2001 - 14:08:03 EST)
  • FTP exploit? (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 16:01:39 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 12:10:03 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 12:06:57 EST)
  • IP<->IP translation (was re: Statements against new.net?) (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 22:33:54 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 13:31:33 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 02:52:12 EST)
  • Re: Namespace conflicts (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 13:04:32 EST)
• Curtis Maurand
  • Re: Network Sizing Guidelines? (Sun Mar 04 2001 - 20:57:04 EST)
  • Re: Network Sizing Guidelines? (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 18:17:08 EST)
• D'Arcy J.M. Cain
  • Re: Would anyone be interested (SQL/Bind) (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 07:28:31 EST)
• Dan Hollis
  • RE: AOL holes again. (Wed Mar 21 2001 - 05:15:07 EST)
  • Re: AOL holes again. (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 19:36:10 EST)
  • Re: Broken Internet? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 15:14:42 EST)
  • Re: ibm.net mailservers gone (Mon Mar 05 2001 - 15:41:13 EST)
• Daniel Golding
  • RE: using ARIN assigned address in Asia (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 11:38:13 EST)
  • RE: using ARIN assigned address in Asia (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 11:09:29 EST)
  • RE: draft-netrail-packet-over-aol-dialup-00.txt (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 00:14:32 EST)
• Daniel R Glover
  • Re: Network Sizing Guidelines? (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 08:50:10 EST)
  • Network Sizing Guidelines? (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 17:00:08 EST)
• Daniel Roesen
  • Re: FTP exploit? (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 05:07:26 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 12:47:46 EST)
• Daniel Senie
  • Re: OT: verizon paging modem numbers (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 13:19:20 EST)
  • Re: Broken Internet? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 19:54:00 EST)
  • Re: UUNet / ATT peering meltdown? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 16:12:08 EST)
• Danny Snyder
  • RE: massive mail replication from 24.93.35.225 (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 00:18:08 EST)
• Daryl G. Jurbala
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 13:00:24 EST)
• David Charlap
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 12:30:19 EST)
  • Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 12:37:11 EST)
• David Hares
  • DNS - Bind database (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 13:05:54 EST)
• David Klindt
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 23:52:54 EST)
• David Lesher
  • Re: Early warning system (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 10:49:10 EST)
  • Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (fwd) (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 11:57:44 EST)
  • Apple security contact? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 16:24:36 EST)
  • Re: Namespace conflicts (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 18:01:10 EST)
  • Re: Linux clusters? (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 10:35:32 EST)
• David McGaugh
  • Re: Loose Source Routing (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 18:59:22 EST)
  • Loose Source Routing (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 12:49:47 EST)
• David Meyer
  • Re: Next NANOG (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 11:03:03 EST)
• David R. Conrad
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 22:35:22 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 21:11:39 EST)
  • Re: Would anyone be interested (SQL/Bind) (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 20:19:22 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 21:54:31 EST)
• David R. Dick
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 17:36:13 EST)
• David Schwartz
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 06:05:39 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 05:16:27 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 05:05:46 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 04:17:38 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 04:06:06 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 03:30:07 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 03:20:22 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 03:09:47 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 22:55:05 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 22:19:54 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 21:40:09 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 21:40:08 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 21:40:03 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 18:08:24 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 17:42:29 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 19:57:07 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 18:37:46 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 16:26:41 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 18:18:08 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 16:22:26 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 15:40:45 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 03:43:16 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 02:46:55 EST)
  • RE: AOL holes again. (Wed Mar 21 2001 - 05:02:44 EST)
  • RE: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (fwd) (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 13:59:02 EST)
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 17:11:31 EST)
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 17:11:28 EST)
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 14:59:28 EST)
  • RE: Broken Internet? [OT] (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 18:09:19 EST)
  • Re: new.net (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 16:32:53 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 22:37:20 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 22:48:39 EST)
• Dean Robb
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 18:00:55 EST)
• Dee McKinney
  • RE: Microwave... (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 19:33:27 EST)
  • Re: Gee, operational content: IPv6 routing issues (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 23:55:20 EST)
  • RE: .xxx conflicts - new.net has competition :-) (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 14:23:27 EST)
  • Re: Network Maps (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 20:51:32 EST)
• deeann mikula
  • Re: verizon paging modem numbers (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 13:49:02 EST)
• Deepak Jain
  • RE: Sprint and peering points (Sat Mar 31 2001 - 21:44:00 EST)
  • RE: Microwave... (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 22:24:37 EST)
• Derek J. Balling
  • RE: verizon paging modem numbers (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 13:02:29 EST)
  • Re: AOL holes again. (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 13:11:14 EST)
• DERY, FREDERIC
  • RE: Network Monitoring in a Firewall Complex (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 11:17:05 EST)
• Devon True
  • Statistics for Public Peering Points (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 23:33:30 EST)
• Doane, Andrew
  • RE: Northpoint is toast (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 21:32:58 EST)
  • RE: UUNet/Chicago (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 17:03:20 EST)
  • RE: An example of reverse-hijack (was: new.net: yet another dns n ames pace overlay play) (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 10:29:29 EST)
  • An example of reverse-hijack (was: new.net: yet another dns names pace overlay play) (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 10:18:57 EST)
  • Resource for determining lit buildings (Mon Mar 05 2001 - 15:40:54 EST)
• Dominic J. Eidson
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 12:58:45 EST)
• Don Simpson
  • Looking Glass Code (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 16:18:17 EST)
• Douglas A. Dever
  • Re: Clear Channel on a T1 (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 14:56:46 EST)
  • Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 14:49:48 EST)
• Eddie Parra
  • Mbone access (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 22:31:53 EST)
• Edward S. Marshall
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 19:55:26 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 20:09:31 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 19:36:19 EST)
• Eric A. Hall
  • Re: dsl providers that will route /24 (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 18:17:27 EST)
  • Re: dsl providers that will route /24 (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 17:56:08 EST)
  • Re: Early warning system (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 01:09:38 EST)
  • Re: AOL holes again. (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 12:57:34 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 17:22:54 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 14:15:35 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 22:41:51 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 18:20:56 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 15:30:23 EST)
• Eric Whitehill
  • RE: UUNet/Chicago (Sat Mar 10 2001 - 23:47:32 EST)
• Gary E. Miller
  • Northpoint is toast (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 21:12:23 EST)
• Geoff Huston
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 22:59:39 EST)
• Glen Turner
  • Re: Microwave... (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 21:11:18 EST)
• Gordon Cook
  • Metro area fiber market issues - May 2001 Cook Report contents (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 23:48:49 EST)
• Greg A. Woods
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 01:56:36 EST)
  • Re: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 01:52:06 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 23:16:59 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 22:14:54 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 12:13:07 EST)
  • RE: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 04:12:20 EST)
  • Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 12:57:41 EST)
  • Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 15:47:04 EST)
  • Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 15:00:53 EST)
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 22:37:21 EST)
  • Re: Broken Internet? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 22:14:12 EST)
  • RE: Broken Internet? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 11:44:29 EST)
  • Re: Broken Internet? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 14:24:42 EST)
  • Re: Broken Internet? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 17:48:46 EST)
  • Re: mail.yahoo.com, "missing A records" and squid proxy (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 16:39:50 EST)
  • Re: external issues in dns scalability (1995) (was Re: Namespaces) (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 12:29:08 EST)
• Greg Rumple
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 17:13:41 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 12:28:54 EST)
• Hank Nussbacher
  • Re: MBone access (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 14:20:58 EST)
  • Re: The Mandatory One Reply To This Weeks: The Cidr Report (Wed Mar 21 2001 - 02:03:52 EST)
  • Looking for Brooks Fiber contact (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 03:49:57 EST)
  • .xxx conflicts - new.net has competition :-) (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 13:16:29 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 09:09:37 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 07:22:12 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 07:04:35 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 06:51:14 EST)
  • Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 03:03:14 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 02:13:31 EST)
• Havard Eidnes
  • Re: MBone access (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 12:04:09 EST)
  • Re: ITU / UN (was: Multiple Roots...) (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 12:08:39 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 05:42:17 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 17:47:57 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 17:33:58 EST)
  • Re: Looking Glass Code (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 17:48:49 EST)
• Henry R. Linneweh
  • Re: POP energy management during power shortages (Sat Mar 31 2001 - 23:17:25 EST)
  • Re: California PUC orders outage notification (Sat Mar 31 2001 - 00:52:00 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Sat Mar 17 2001 - 12:29:25 EST)
  • Re: Netscan.org? anyone? (Sun Mar 11 2001 - 15:16:29 EST)
  • Re: Namespace conflicts (Sat Mar 10 2001 - 15:42:21 EST)
• Henry Yen
  • Re: Roaring Penguin - Re: PPPoE server software? (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 17:07:14 EST)
• Howard C. Berkowitz
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 16:04:45 EST)
  • Re: Routing Loops in IGRP (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 09:29:58 EST)
  • Re: Next NANOG (really off topic) (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 11:35:11 EST)
• Hugh Irvine
  • Re: Next NANOG (really off topic) (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 17:47:51 EST)
• Ian Cooper
  • RE: new.net (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 19:59:09 EST)
• Irwin Lazar
  • RE: Content Injection Appliance (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 17:36:23 EST)
  • RE: Gee, operational content: IPv6 routing issues (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 10:14:54 EST)
  • RE: Little survey: What do people use to backup configurations ? (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 19:04:29 EST)
  • RE: Network Sizing Guidelines? (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 18:58:37 EST)
• Jade E. Deane
  • RE: California PUC blocks Northpoint shutdown (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 22:49:45 EST)
  • out/in band management networks (incredibly non-operational) (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 13:14:33 EST)
• James DeMong
  • GSR and bgp maximum-paths (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 11:19:16 EST)
• James M. Kretchmar
  • Re: Little survey: What do people use to backup configurations ? (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 18:45:00 EST)
• James M. Shuler III
  • Re: Real world Anti-DDOS attack practice. (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 21:30:20 EST)
  • Re: Real world Anti-DDOS attack practice. (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 21:16:14 EST)
  • Re: AOL holes again. (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 18:17:19 EST)
  • Re: Multiple Roots simply need context (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 18:39:52 EST)
• Jared Mauch
  • Re: MBone access (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 15:23:16 EST)
  • Re: Mbone access (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 10:05:51 EST)
  • Re: Mbone access (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 22:44:30 EST)
  • Re: Loose Source Routing (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 14:40:13 EST)
• Jason A. Mills
  • Re: Clear Channel on a T1 (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 13:41:50 EST)
• Jason Lixfeld
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 02:14:08 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Sun Mar 25 2001 - 15:20:32 EST)
  • Anyone at the @Home NOC? (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 14:02:24 EST)
  • RE: UUNet/Chicago (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 20:07:09 EST)
• Jason Slagle
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 21:10:34 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 12:40:33 EST)
• Jeff Workman
  • Re: draft-netrail-packet-over-aol-dialup-00.txt (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 19:10:14 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Sat Mar 17 2001 - 05:08:07 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 12:06:40 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 09:19:13 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 08:37:21 EST)
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 08:26:55 EST)
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 15:11:16 EST)
  • Re: .xxx conflicts - new.net has competition :-) (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 14:25:14 EST)
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 13:18:25 EST)
• Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: Early warning system (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 09:46:28 EST)
• Jerry Scharf
  • OT financial analysis of telecom sector and debt (Sat Mar 31 2001 - 23:05:43 EST)
  • Re: FW: DECNet over IP? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 11:39:25 EST)
• Jim Dixon
  • Re: DNS threads (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 10:19:55 EST)
  • Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 03:56:59 EST)
  • Re: DNS Control (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 08:42:33 EST)
  • RE: Reality Check (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 17:53:04 EST)
  • RE: Reality Check (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 16:13:17 EST)
  • Re: Reality Check (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 14:42:11 EST)
  • Re: new.net (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 02:48:12 EST)
  • Re: new.net (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 17:11:35 EST)
• Jim Duncan
  • Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 22:35:37 EST)
• Jim Mercer
  • teleglobe, toronto router or link broken (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 12:23:18 EST)
  • Re: RACO looking for you (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 01:39:31 EST)
  • RACO looking for you (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 14:24:47 EST)
  • Re: Broken Internet? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 21:57:12 EST)
  • mail.yahoo.com, "missing A records" and squid proxy (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 10:12:56 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 02:31:34 EST)
• Joe Abley
  • BGP Community Attribute Support (Sat Mar 24 2001 - 22:25:35 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 13:08:33 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 10:37:18 EST)
  • arrgh (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 11:05:41 EST)
• Joe Marr
  • RE: UUNet / ATT peering meltdown? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 13:21:16 EST)
• Joe McGuckin
  • Re: OUTAGE: network shutdown (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 12:33:59 EST)
• Joe Provo
  • Re: EP.net Issues (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 11:29:46 EST)
  • Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 13:45:45 EST)
  • Re: Namespace conflicts (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 13:07:50 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 15:39:39 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 15:22:53 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 12:50:47 EST)
• Joe Shaw
  • Re: Summary: Seattle earthquake - no impact (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 05:38:40 EST)
• Joe Wood
  • Re: EP.net Issues (Wed Mar 21 2001 - 16:57:42 EST)
  • EP.net Issues (Wed Mar 21 2001 - 14:44:42 EST)
• Joel Jaeggli
  • RE: Zero-wing references [OFF-TOPIC] (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 14:26:49 EST)
• John
  • Re: Alteon Question (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 18:14:22 EST)
  • test (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 13:02:17 EST)
  • BGPv5 (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 13:00:04 EST)
• John A. Tamplin
  • Re: Early warning system (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 12:10:28 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 01:14:14 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 13:15:59 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 12:57:26 EST)
• John Fraizer
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 06:27:20 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 05:50:53 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 04:55:52 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 03:57:49 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 03:50:12 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 03:33:01 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 03:18:54 EST)
  • Re: Experience with Larscom NetEdge 85M's (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 05:26:13 EST)
  • RE: Microwave... (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 03:38:36 EST)
  • RE: Microwave... (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 21:20:56 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 18:06:20 EST)
  • Re: Sprint hosed...routing breakdown in Chicago (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 17:12:37 EST)
  • Re: RADB lookup help (Fri Mar 23 2001 - 05:57:46 EST)
  • RADB lookup help (Fri Mar 23 2001 - 05:27:18 EST)
  • Re: EP.net Issues (Wed Mar 21 2001 - 20:48:04 EST)
  • Re: EP.net Issues (Wed Mar 21 2001 - 16:24:02 EST)
  • Re: EP.net Issues (Wed Mar 21 2001 - 16:22:09 EST)
  • RE: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 21:46:56 EST)
  • Re: Covad SUCKS! (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 04:28:57 EST)
• John Hawkinson
  • Re: Loose Source Routing (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 12:22:10 EST)
  • Re: Loose Source Routing (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 12:15:41 EST)
• john heasley
  • Re: Looking Glass Code (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 16:29:06 EST)
• John Murphy
  • Re: Little survey: What do people use to backup configurations ? (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 20:43:18 EST)
• John Palmer (NANOG Acct)
  • Re: Looking for a good dual homing situation in Macomb County, MI (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 16:33:26 EST)
  • Looking for a good dual homing situation in Macomb County, MI (Sun Mar 25 2001 - 16:30:39 EST)
• John Payne
  • Re: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 04:43:39 EST)
  • Re: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 00:31:31 EST)
  • Re: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 00:22:06 EST)
  • Re: dsl providers that will route /24 (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 22:00:49 EST)
  • Re: dsl providers that will route /24 (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 18:15:25 EST)
  • Re: dsl providers that will route /24 (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 18:14:08 EST)
  • Re: dsl providers that will route /24 (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 15:26:54 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 07:10:02 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 17:04:03 EST)
  • Re: .mn.rr.com dns possibly hacked? (Sat Mar 10 2001 - 15:54:30 EST)
  • Re: mail.yahoo.com, "missing A records" and squid proxy (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 17:34:58 EST)
• John R Levine
  • Lame reverse delegation at Sprint (Sat Mar 31 2001 - 01:14:39 EST)
• John R. Levine
  • Re: ibm.net mailservers gone (Mon Mar 05 2001 - 23:35:47 EST)
• John Todd
  • Re: Looking Glass Code (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 16:59:27 EST)
• Jon Allen Boone
  • Re: GSR and bgp maximum-paths (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 19:44:11 EST)
• Jon Mansey
  • Re: Linux clusters? (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 10:58:58 EST)
• Jon Stanley
  • Experience with Larscom NetEdge 85M's (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 04:02:06 EST)
• Jonathan Disher
  • Provider outage explanations... (Sun Mar 25 2001 - 07:00:27 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 05:21:00 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 05:14:40 EST)
• Joseph T. Klein
  • Tower of Babbel (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 15:01:31 EST)
• Josh Richards
  • Re: Sprint and peering points (Sat Mar 31 2001 - 14:51:15 EST)
  • Re: Sprint and peering points (Sat Mar 31 2001 - 14:17:44 EST)
  • Re: Content Injection Appliance (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 15:49:07 EST)
  • Re: RADIUS info for traveling users ... (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 15:42:33 EST)
  • Re: Microwave... (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 15:23:42 EST)
  • Re: Early warning system (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 17:33:21 EST)
  • Re: new.net (Sat Mar 10 2001 - 03:14:24 EST)
  • Re: Covad SUCKS! (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 03:17:43 EST)
• Joshua Goodall
  • Namespaces (was: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play) (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 04:21:07 EST)
• just me.
  • Re: MBone access (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 17:39:55 EST)
  • RE: Broken Internet? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 19:16:10 EST)
• Justin A. Kraft
  • Looking for a T-1 loop in Antigua (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 17:02:02 EST)
• k claffy
  • Re: Network Maps (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 20:57:39 EST)
• K.Graham
  • Summary of Alteon inquiry (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 09:46:27 EST)
  • RE: Alteon Responses (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 17:28:09 EST)
  • Alteon Question (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 16:41:19 EST)
• Karl
  • Roaring Penguin - Re: PPPoE server software? (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 16:26:45 EST)
• Karyn Ulriksen
  • Contact for Firstworld Communications (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 15:40:21 EST)
  • Re: Search Engine Accountability (was RE: Reality Check) (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 17:41:57 EST)
  • Search Engine Accountability (was RE: Reality Check) (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 13:36:31 EST)
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 20:26:37 EST)
  • RE: Broken Internet? [OT] (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 18:09:39 EST)
  • The .SUCKS TLD saga continues (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 19:17:47 EST)
  • more .sucks TLD fun (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 14:37:07 EST)
  • RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 13:21:32 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 12:36:39 EST)
  • RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 15:55:32 EST)
  • RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 13:25:21 EST)
  • Network Maps (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 20:07:24 EST)
• Kavi, Prabhu
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 18:46:26 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 16:10:14 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 12:41:56 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 09:59:53 EST)
  • Snowstorm effects on Network Utilization? (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 13:56:19 EST)
• Ken Eddings
  • RE: new.net (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 20:53:56 EST)
• ken harris.
  • Re: AOL holes again. (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 13:36:02 EST)
  • Re: FTP exploit? (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 19:17:32 EST)
  • Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Sat Mar 17 2001 - 00:09:05 EST)
• Kenji Anzai
  • RE: using ARIN assigned address in Asia (Wed Mar 21 2001 - 22:00:14 EST)
  • using ARIN assigned address in Asia (Wed Mar 21 2001 - 05:08:02 EST)
• Kent Yu
  • Is www.cisco.com down? (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 23:15:59 EST)
• Kevin Day
  • .mn.rr.com dns possibly hacked? (Sat Mar 10 2001 - 14:28:06 EST)
• Kevin Facinelli
  • Re: Advice on colo locations in SJC (Fri Mar 23 2001 - 17:20:25 EST)
  • Call for Whitepapers / Research (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 11:59:20 EST)
• Kevin Loch
  • Re: Geomagnetic Disturbance Was: Re: Microwave (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 13:35:31 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 13:49:56 EST)
  • Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 12:20:31 EST)
  • Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 17:57:14 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 14:06:23 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 12:38:17 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 12:30:09 EST)
• Kevin Oberman
  • Re: Microwave... (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 11:27:28 EST)
  • Re: Advanced Warning: Qwest/Lucent ATM upgrade (Fri Mar 23 2001 - 19:57:19 EST)
  • Re: Early warning system (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 11:41:54 EST)
  • Re: FW: DECNet over IP? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 10:29:38 EST)
  • Re: FW: DECNet over IP? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 13:34:30 EST)
  • Re: Loose Source Routing (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 11:49:14 EST)
  • Re: Does peering at an ATM MAE require a router that does ABR? (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 16:36:03 EST)
• Krzysztof Adamski
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 15:05:56 EST)
• Larry Rosenman
  • InterNAP (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 17:27:29 EST)
• Lee Watterworth
  • RE: UUNet/Chicago (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 17:46:29 EST)
• Lionel Lauer
  • Re: Early warning system (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 01:36:26 EST)
• Lloyd Taylor
  • Re: Early warning system (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 13:18:41 EST)
• M. David Leonard
  • RE: AOL holes again. (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 17:17:22 EST)
  • Re: AOL holes again. (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 16:42:21 EST)
• Majdi S. Abbas
  • Re: California PUC blocks Northpoint shutdown (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 22:11:35 EST)
  • Re: Clear Channel on a T1 (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 17:49:31 EST)
• Manish Patil
  • Routing Loops in IGRP (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 22:51:55 EST)
• Marc Teichtahl
  • Re: RADIUS info for traveling users ... (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 02:00:37 EST)
• Mark Borchers
  • RE: Namespace conflicts (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 14:34:19 EST)
  • RE: Loose Source Routing (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 14:46:56 EST)
• Mark Kosters
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 16:56:13 EST)
• Mark Prior
  • Re: [apops] The Cidr Report (Sun Mar 11 2001 - 07:19:21 EST)
• Mark Radabaugh - Amplex
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 13:18:51 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 13:53:38 EST)
• Marshall Eubanks
  • Re: MBone access (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 16:09:36 EST)
  • Re: MBone access (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 15:09:09 EST)
  • Re: MBone access (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 13:35:27 EST)
  • Re: Mbone access (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 10:21:45 EST)
  • Re: Mbone access (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 08:08:19 EST)
  • Re: ARIN overloaded... (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 14:52:11 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 16:04:12 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 07:05:00 EST)
  • Re: Network Sizing Guidelines? (Mon Mar 05 2001 - 23:01:36 EST)
• Martin Hannigan
  • Re: new.net (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 17:23:06 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 15:07:57 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 13:11:58 EST)
• Martin Picard
  • Secure multi-homing Internet Access (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 21:24:29 EST)
• Martin, Christian
  • RE: MBone access (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 19:30:49 EST)
• Mathew Butler
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 16:07:48 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 15:54:23 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 14:08:48 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 14:01:50 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 13:47:22 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 20:01:04 EST)
  • RE: Broken Internet? [OT] (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 16:37:02 EST)
  • RE: new.net (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 19:59:22 EST)
  • RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 06:30:26 EST)
  • RE: Network Sizing Guidelines? [OT] (Sun Mar 04 2001 - 02:15:49 EST)
  • RE: Covad SUCKS! (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 18:14:07 EST)
  • RE: Zero-wing references [OFF-TOPIC] (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 13:52:43 EST)
• Mathias Koerber
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 00:40:36 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 07:21:19 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 23:00:29 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 23:00:26 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 23:00:22 EST)
• Matt Clauson
  • Fwd: [Interchange-announce] Security advisory (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 20:35:13 EST)
• Matt Cramer
  • PPPoE server software? (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 10:48:58 EST)
• Matt Levine
  • Input.. (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 15:08:52 EST)
  • Re: AOL holes again. (Wed Mar 21 2001 - 12:00:01 EST)
  • ARIN overloaded... (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 14:39:30 EST)
  • RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 14:17:06 EST)
• Matthew Schlegel
  • RE: (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 11:46:02 EST)
• michael
  • att network people here (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 14:34:15 EST)
  • Re: dsl providers that will route /24 (Sun Mar 25 2001 - 23:53:55 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Sun Mar 25 2001 - 15:35:10 EST)
  • dsl providers that will route /24 (Sun Mar 25 2001 - 11:08:04 EST)
• Michael Shields
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 03:50:17 EST)
• michael thomas guldan
  • looking for midwest sprint rep (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 13:02:34 EST)
• Michelle T
  • RE: .mn.rr.com dns possibly hacked? (Sat Mar 17 2001 - 10:43:06 EST)
  • RE: .mn.rr.com dns possibly hacked? (Sat Mar 17 2001 - 10:42:22 EST)
  • RE: UUNet/Chicago (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 18:04:24 EST)
• Miguel Mata-Cardona
  • network availability standards (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 13:04:37 EST)
• Mike Batchelor
  • California PUC blocks Northpoint shutdown (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 17:23:27 EST)
  • RE: verizon paging modem numbers (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 12:40:24 EST)
  • RE: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 19:36:28 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 13:02:33 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 12:44:12 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 19:14:50 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 18:44:30 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 18:12:59 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 15:18:12 EST)
  • RE: new.net (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 19:48:22 EST)
  • RE: new.net (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 15:59:09 EST)
  • RE: new.net (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 14:25:18 EST)
  • RE: DNS - Bind database (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 14:21:37 EST)
  • RE: NetSol Host Changes, NetSol Problems (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 14:20:41 EST)
  • RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 17:51:31 EST)
  • RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 17:13:58 EST)
  • RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 20:32:52 EST)
• mike harrison
  • Re: DNS Control (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 10:10:26 EST)
  • DNS Control (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 08:27:14 EST)
  • Re: Would anyone be interested (SQL/Bind) (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 09:18:22 EST)
  • Re: DNS - Bind database (Sat Mar 10 2001 - 12:07:46 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 21:22:14 EST)
• Miles Fidelman
  • Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 18:13:31 EST)
  • Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 14:37:13 EST)
  • Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 14:23:26 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 11:47:09 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 09:01:46 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 08:37:43 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 18:17:19 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 16:30:26 EST)
  • Re: Network Sizing Guidelines? (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 17:15:23 EST)
• Mohan Sundar
  • Re: RADIUS info for traveling users ... (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 15:02:14 EST)
  • RADIUS info for traveling users ... (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 13:35:27 EST)
• Morris Allen
  • News Feed (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 12:34:03 EST)
• Muljawan Hendrianto
  • Re: Linux clusters? (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 00:38:56 EST)
• Nanog
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 00:37:07 EST)
• Neil J. McRae
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 21 2001 - 02:31:31 EST)
• nicholas harteau
  • Re: UUNet/Chicago (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 17:14:26 EST)
  • Re: UUNet/Chicago (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 17:00:09 EST)
  • UUNet/Chicago (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 16:45:56 EST)
• Nick Guy
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 09:46:50 EST)
• Omachonu Ogali
  • draft-netrail-packet-over-aol-dialup-00.txt (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 18:29:01 EST)
  • Re: Namespace conflicts (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 10:45:22 EST)
• Owen DeLong
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 13:00:29 EST)
  • Re: Reality Check (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 12:17:42 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 15:34:25 EST)
  • Re: Namespace conflicts (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 12:21:50 EST)
• Patrick Corliss
  • Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 19:54:21 EST)
  • Re: DNS threads (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 10:42:11 EST)
  • Re: DNS threads (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 10:09:40 EST)
  • Re: DNS is like radio frequencies (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 03:36:51 EST)
  • Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 03:14:55 EST)
  • Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 01:11:32 EST)
  • Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 13:36:57 EST)
  • Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 11:38:54 EST)
  • Re: Top Level Domain Finder Tools (Sat Mar 17 2001 - 17:11:41 EST)
• Patrick Greenwell
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 01:13:08 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 00:44:04 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 00:31:41 EST)
  • Re: Reality Check (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 16:10:31 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 16:02:52 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 16:19:03 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 15:59:01 EST)
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 10:04:11 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 12:17:25 EST)
  • Re: new.net (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 11:26:47 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 10:02:46 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 23:47:05 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 23:39:37 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 23:37:58 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 14:37:26 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 14:29:23 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 13:10:34 EST)
  • Re: DNS - Bind database (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 23:05:59 EST)
  • Re: DNS - Bind database (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 14:22:02 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 12:00:55 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 05:42:50 EST)
  • Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 04:50:36 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 13:08:23 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 21:11:08 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 20:56:59 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 14:36:42 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 13:04:46 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 12:56:11 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 11:47:28 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 11:13:36 EST)
• Patrik Greenspawn
  • Thanks Merit! (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 10:59:33 EST)
• Paul A Vixie
  • rtty 4.0 (Sat Mar 24 2001 - 17:41:01 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 12:23:00 EST)
  • new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 01:59:49 EST)
• Paul Froutan
  • Re: GSR and bgp maximum-paths (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 12:15:49 EST)
• Paul Lantinga
  • RE: Microwave... (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 22:28:46 EST)
• Paul Mabey
  • Re: ibm.net mailservers gone (Mon Mar 05 2001 - 10:54:18 EST)
• Paul Thornton
  • Re: Statistics for Public Peering Points (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 00:02:57 EST)
• Paul Vixie
  • external issues in dns scalability (1995) (was Re: Namespaces) (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 10:43:37 EST)
• Peter Francis
  • Re: Broken Internet? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 21:40:42 EST)
  • Re: Broken Internet? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 20:22:51 EST)
  • Re: Broken Internet? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 16:45:44 EST)
• Peter Galbavy
  • Re: Clear Channel on a T1 (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 04:11:33 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 12:08:59 EST)
  • Re: Would anyone be interested (SQL/Bind) (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 10:01:07 EST)
• Peter van Dijk
  • Re: AOL holes again. (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 15:40:02 EST)
• Petri Stephen
  • Test (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 11:58:27 EST)
• Pim van Riezen
  • Re: [NANOG] I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 17:57:28 EST)
  • Re: [NANOG] Re: Namespace conflicts (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 18:40:55 EST)
  • Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 16:18:04 EST)
• Rachel Warren
  • Re: Clear Channel on a T1 (Fri Mar 23 2001 - 09:06:57 EST)
• Rafi Sadowsky
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 07:50:02 EST)
  • Re: Looking Glass Code (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 07:35:31 EST)
  • Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 22:12:28 EST)
  • Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 12:18:32 EST)
• Randy Bush
  • RE: using ARIN assigned address in Asia (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 11:27:37 EST)
  • Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 20:13:51 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 14:08:21 EST)
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 21:54:50 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 22:27:26 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 22:21:02 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 09:12:48 EST)
  • massive mail replication from 24.93.35.225 (Sun Mar 11 2001 - 23:51:16 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 07:02:39 EST)
  • Re: Loose Source Routing (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 17:54:03 EST)
• Rich Fulton
  • Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 18:23:29 EST)
  • Re: BGP listserv (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 14:17:01 EST)
• Richard A. Steenbergen
  • Re: Is www.cisco.com down? (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 00:36:01 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 19:50:43 EST)
  • Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 18:09:32 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 17:47:21 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 16:48:21 EST)
• Richard Jimmerson
  • RE: using ARIN assigned address in Asia (Wed Mar 21 2001 - 18:20:15 EST)
• Richard Welty
  • RE: AOL holes again. (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 13:43:59 EST)
  • RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 15:21:58 EST)
• Rick Irving
  • Re: Multiple Roots simply need context (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 16:18:27 EST)
• Rob Evans
  • Re: GSR and bgp maximum-paths (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 01:46:05 EST)
  • Re: GSR and bgp maximum-paths (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 13:39:49 EST)
• Rob Thomas
  • Re: BGP listserv (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 12:27:45 EST)
• Robert Beverly
  • Cisco Misrepresents Results of First Independent Test of Core Routers (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 08:57:34 EST)
• Rodney Joffe
  • Microwave... (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 19:15:59 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 00:50:44 EST)
• Roeland Meyer
  • RE: California PUC orders outage notification (Sat Mar 31 2001 - 14:00:32 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 18:50:28 EST)
  • RE: dsl providers that will route /24 (Sun Mar 25 2001 - 15:04:14 EST)
  • RE: AOL holes again. (Wed Mar 21 2001 - 12:13:46 EST)
  • RE: AOL holes again. (Wed Mar 21 2001 - 10:55:05 EST)
  • RE: AOL holes again. (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 17:06:16 EST)
  • RE: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 19:30:53 EST)
  • RE: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 03:53:58 EST)
  • RE: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 16:03:17 EST)
  • RE: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Sun Mar 18 2001 - 16:00:23 EST)
  • RE: Top Level Domain Finder Tools (Sat Mar 17 2001 - 19:34:26 EST)
  • RE: Broken Internet? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 14:43:54 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 13:04:57 EST)
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 12:02:22 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 11:45:48 EST)
  • RE: Broken Internet? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 05:34:35 EST)
  • RE: Broken Internet? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 04:25:51 EST)
  • RE: Broken Internet? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 04:08:53 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 03:58:10 EST)
  • RE: Broken Internet? (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 01:25:08 EST)
  • RE: Reality Check (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 01:10:09 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 22:20:55 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 18:39:16 EST)
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 18:40:13 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 16:25:07 EST)
  • RE: Inane ... even for NANOG. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 15:07:49 EST)
  • Recall: Inane ... even for NANOG. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 15:07:18 EST)
  • RE: Inane ... even for NANOG. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 14:43:58 EST)
  • Inane ... even for NANOG. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 13:08:06 EST)
  • RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 12:35:37 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 12:22:52 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 12:17:38 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 03:25:17 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 23:52:37 EST)
  • RE: Broken Internet? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 16:37:56 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 12:48:11 EST)
  • Forgery! ... (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 12:16:24 EST)
  • RE: new.net (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 06:44:13 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 06:19:22 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 06:08:50 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 05:58:08 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 05:48:21 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 05:51:29 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 16:55:46 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 16:14:54 EST)
  • RE: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 15:54:42 EST)
  • Broken Internet? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 15:52:41 EST)
  • RE: Would anyone be interested (SQL/Bind) (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 05:01:30 EST)
  • RE: more .sucks TLD fun (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 14:51:42 EST)
  • RE: external issues in dns scalability (1995) (was Re: Namespaces ) (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 14:01:37 EST)
  • RE: Namespace conflicts (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 19:05:16 EST)
• Roland Dobbins
  • Re: dsl providers that will route /24 (Sun Mar 25 2001 - 16:08:46 EST)
  • Re: Top Level Domain Finder Tools (Sat Mar 17 2001 - 16:48:18 EST)
• Ron Buchalski
  • Re: Clear Channel on a T1 (Fri Mar 23 2001 - 17:51:43 EST)
  • Re: Clear Channel on a T1 (Fri Mar 23 2001 - 17:51:42 EST)
  • Re: Clear Channel on a T1 (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 22:19:35 EST)
• Ron Snyder
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 11:47:37 EST)
• Roy
  • Sprint and peering points (Sat Mar 31 2001 - 11:21:54 EST)
  • ibm.net mailservers gone (Mon Mar 05 2001 - 10:25:51 EST)
• Roy Hockett
  • OT: verizon paging modem numbers (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 12:08:00 EST)
• Rusty H. Hodge
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 04:18:48 EST)
• Sabri Berisha
  • Re: home.nl NOC contact number. (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 09:08:10 EST)
• Saint skullY the Dazed
  • Re: Namespace conflicts (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 09:46:56 EST)
• Sam Habash
  • Re: Covad SUCKS! (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 00:04:16 EST)
• Sam Thomas
  • Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 05:41:19 EST)
• Scott Francis
  • Re: dsl providers that will route /24 (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 00:06:09 EST)
  • Re: dsl providers that will route /24 (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 17:10:46 EST)
  • Re: using ARIN assigned address in Asia (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 11:26:13 EST)
  • Re: FTP exploit? (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 16:20:59 EST)
  • Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 16:17:18 EST)
  • Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 03:33:07 EST)
  • Re: Search Engine Accountability (was RE: Reality Check) (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 14:54:59 EST)
  • Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 18:41:05 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 18:01:16 EST)
  • Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 18:10:33 EST)
  • Re: Reality Check (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 18:07:30 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 17:32:40 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 13:33:53 EST)
  • Re: Reality Check (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 13:19:26 EST)
  • Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 13:19:18 EST)
  • Re: Reality Check (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 19:44:10 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 02:31:17 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 02:13:14 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 17:12:12 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 08:53:21 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 08:28:53 EST)
  • Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin (Sun Mar 11 2001 - 11:43:57 EST)
  • Re: Network Sizing Guidelines? (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 19:40:27 EST)
  • Re: Network Sizing Guidelines? (Fri Mar 02 2001 - 05:14:23 EST)
  • Re: Next NANOG (really off topic) (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 19:29:10 EST)
• Scott Gifford
  • Re: Namespace conflicts (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 18:15:25 EST)
  • Re: new.net (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 18:12:30 EST)
  • Re: new.net (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 15:56:34 EST)
  • Re: new.net (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 13:07:15 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 19:48:46 EST)
  • Re: Namespaces (was: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play) (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 19:54:42 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 18:50:25 EST)
  • Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 04:15:44 EST)
• Sean Donelan
  • POP energy management during power shortages (Sat Mar 31 2001 - 21:54:12 EST)
  • California PUC orders outage notification (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 12:12:54 EST)
  • OUTAGE: network shutdown (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 11:33:12 EST)
  • Re: SWM ISO empirical operational data... (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 15:10:17 EST)
  • Re: Advanced Warning: Qwest/Lucent ATM upgrade (Fri Mar 23 2001 - 18:53:35 EST)
  • Advanced Warning: Qwest/Lucent ATM upgrade (Fri Mar 23 2001 - 14:25:48 EST)
  • Re: Early warning system (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 16:42:08 EST)
  • Early warning system (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 00:56:46 EST)
  • California rolling blackouts - March edition (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 19:55:11 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 12:52:07 EST)
  • Re: UUNet / ATT peering meltdown? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 15:25:52 EST)
  • Re: Statements against new.net? (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 14:13:18 EST)
  • Re: Sprint Problem (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 14:48:57 EST)
  • Re: Namespaces (was: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play) (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 05:28:22 EST)