Nanog 0103
By messages with attachments

Most recent messages
1049 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]
About this archive
Other mail archives

Starting: Thu Mar 01 2001 - 00:08:37 EST
Ending: Sat Mar 31 2001 - 23:24:43 EST

• Re: Covad SUCKS! Josh Richards (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 03:17:43 EST)
  1. part (241 bytes)
• RE: Matthew Schlegel (Thu Mar 01 2001 - 11:46:02 EST)
  1. part (1287 bytes)
• Loose Source Routing David McGaugh (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 12:49:47 EST)
  1. dmcgaugh.vcf (305 bytes)
• Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (no name) (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 15:13:39 EST)
  1. part (212 bytes)
• Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play William Allen Simpson (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 15:26:00 EST)
  1. part (2312 bytes)
• Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Shawn McMahon (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 18:51:26 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: Loose Source Routing David McGaugh (Tue Mar 06 2001 - 18:59:22 EST)
  1. dmcgaugh.vcf (305 bytes)
• Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Aaron Hopkins (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 03:20:09 EST)
  1. part (3081 bytes)
• RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Mathew Butler (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 06:30:26 EST)
  1. part (7282 bytes)
• Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play William Allen Simpson (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 17:01:24 EST)
  1. part (4354 bytes)
• Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Shawn McMahon (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 17:38:47 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (fwd) Shawn McMahon (Wed Mar 07 2001 - 20:28:47 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play William Allen Simpson (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 09:16:37 EST)
  1. part (4070 bytes)
• Re: external issues in dns scalability (1995) (was Re: Namespaces) William Allen Simpson (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 11:46:28 EST)
  1. part (1321 bytes)
• Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Shawn McMahon (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 17:35:42 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: Namespace conflicts Shawn McMahon (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 18:15:33 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: [NANOG] Re: Namespace conflicts Shawn McMahon (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 18:49:43 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play William Allen Simpson (Thu Mar 08 2001 - 23:19:38 EST)
  1. part (1163 bytes)
• Re: new.net Shawn McMahon (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 06:48:45 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: Namespace conflicts Shawn McMahon (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 06:49:52 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: Namespace conflicts Bryan C. Andregg (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 10:02:28 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: Namespace conflicts Shawn McMahon (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 14:32:29 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: Namespace conflicts Shawn McMahon (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 14:37:20 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: mail.yahoo.com, "missing A records" and squid proxy Shawn McMahon (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 14:36:26 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: Namespace conflicts Shawn McMahon (Fri Mar 09 2001 - 15:14:26 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: new.net Josh Richards (Sat Mar 10 2001 - 03:14:24 EST)
  1. part (241 bytes)
• Re: new.net (no name) (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 10:26:17 EST)
  1. part (212 bytes)
• Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play (no name) (Mon Mar 12 2001 - 10:28:36 EST)
  1. part (212 bytes)
• Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 15:34:57 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• DSL backhaul provisioning William Allen Simpson (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 20:49:10 EST)
  1. part (1450 bytes)
• The Meat of The Matter Timothy R. McKee (Tue Mar 13 2001 - 20:13:48 EST)
  1. part (1067 bytes)
• FW: DECNet over IP? Timothy R. McKee (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 12:46:00 EST)
  1. part (1915 bytes)
• RE: Statements against new.net? Daryl G. Jurbala (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 13:00:24 EST)
  1. smime.p7s (2266 bytes)
• Reality Check Timothy R. McKee (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 13:08:29 EST)
  1. part (1497 bytes)
• FW: FW: DECNet over IP? Timothy R. McKee (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 15:29:04 EST)
  1. part (2552 bytes)
• RE: Reality Check Timothy R. McKee (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 15:28:40 EST)
  1. part (3080 bytes)
• RE: Reality Check Timothy R. McKee (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 16:36:44 EST)
  1. part (4606 bytes)
• RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. Timothy R. McKee (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 19:23:02 EST)
  1. part (2708 bytes)
• Re: DSL backhaul provisioning Shawn McMahon (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 20:36:15 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Wed Mar 14 2001 - 21:01:31 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. Timothy R. McKee (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 09:52:31 EST)
  1. part (1918 bytes)
• Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 18:39:03 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. Shawn McMahon (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 18:36:34 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: Reality Check Shawn McMahon (Thu Mar 15 2001 - 21:08:52 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 08:54:45 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 09:59:18 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 10:05:15 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Sad state of affairs Timothy R. McKee (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 10:10:56 EST)
  1. part (1639 bytes)
• RE: Gee, operational content: IPv6 routing issues Irwin Lazar (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 10:14:54 EST)
  1. Irwin_Lazar.vcf (410 bytes)
• RE: Broken Internet? just me. (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 19:16:10 EST)
  1. part (816 bytes)
• Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't. Aaron Hopkins (Fri Mar 16 2001 - 23:46:55 EST)
  1. part (1975 bytes)
• Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach Shawn McMahon (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 15:20:38 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach Shawn McMahon (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 15:24:57 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• RE: Multiple Roots simply need context Timothy R. McKee (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 16:14:03 EST)
  1. part (2406 bytes)
• Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach Shawn McMahon (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 16:37:46 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach Shawn McMahon (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 17:58:24 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl Auerbach Shawn McMahon (Mon Mar 19 2001 - 21:39:34 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 14:47:51 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 18:37:33 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: AOL holes again. (no name) (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 18:47:31 EST)
  1. part (212 bytes)
• Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 19:23:41 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 19:42:24 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Tue Mar 20 2001 - 20:58:45 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Wed Mar 21 2001 - 11:50:17 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Wed Mar 21 2001 - 12:21:41 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 08:14:37 EST)
  1. part (233 bytes)
• Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Terrence Chatfield (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 13:33:13 EST)
  1. Chat.vcf (490 bytes)
• Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Terrence Chatfield (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 14:27:21 EST)
  1. Chat.vcf (490 bytes)
• Re: Early warning system Josh Richards (Thu Mar 22 2001 - 17:33:21 EST)
  1. part (241 bytes)
• PPPoE server software? Matt Cramer (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 10:48:58 EST)
  1. part (1294 bytes)
• Re: MBone access Tim Winders (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 15:40:06 EST)
  1. part (1405 bytes)
• Re: MBone access Tim Winders (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 18:18:55 EST)
  1. part (2771 bytes)
• Re: Microwave... Josh Richards (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 15:23:42 EST)
  1. part (241 bytes)
• Re: RADIUS info for traveling users ... Josh Richards (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 15:42:33 EST)
  1. part (241 bytes)
• Re: Content Injection Appliance Josh Richards (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 15:49:07 EST)
  1. part (241 bytes)
• RE: dsl providers that will route /24 Tim Winders (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 16:50:48 EST)
  1. part (3660 bytes)
• Re: MBone access Bill Nickless (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 17:18:08 EST)
  1. part (1009 bytes)
• RE: MBone access Bill Nickless (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 17:22:15 EST)
  1. part (1854 bytes)
• RE: dsl providers that will route /24 Tim Winders (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 19:34:26 EST)
  1. part (4239 bytes)
• RE: dsl providers that will route /24 Tim Winders (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 20:25:27 EST)
  1. part (1470 bytes)
• Re: dsl providers that will route /24 (no name) (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 18:20:14 EST)
  1. part (212 bytes)
• Re: Sprint and peering points Josh Richards (Sat Mar 31 2001 - 14:17:44 EST)
  1. part (241 bytes)
• Re: Sprint and peering points Josh Richards (Sat Mar 31 2001 - 14:51:15 EST)
  1. part (241 bytes)

Last message date: Sat Mar 31 2001 - 23:24:43 EST
Archived on: Thu Dec 09 2004 - 15:54:44 EST

1049 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]
About this archive
Other mail archives