Nanog 0101
By Author

1088 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
About this archive
Other mail archives

Starting: Sat Feb 24 2001 - 10:57:15 EST
Ending: Sat Feb 24 2001 - 11:08:52 EST

• (no email)
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 15:05:00 EST)
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 15:04:27 EST)
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 23:42:26 EST)
  • Re: BIND-9 vs. BIND-8 config incompatabilities continued.... (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 18:31:46 EST)
  • Re: Greg, you're tryin' too hard (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 17:35:34 EST)
  • Re: MS explains (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 20:33:25 EST)
  • Re: Monitoring highly redundant operations (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 20:06:28 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:26:46 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 03:08:45 EST)
  • RE: From Microsoft's site (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 00:37:58 EST)
  • Re: Monitoring highly redundant operations (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 20:46:53 EST)
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 20:28:34 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:09:06 EST)
  • Re: m$ blames icann (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:03:54 EST)
  • Re: Maintenance Windows for Networks Spanning Multiple Time Zones (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:43:29 EST)
  • RE: Sprint / C&W peering issues? (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 14:31:23 EST)
  • Sprint / C&W peering issues? (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 19:03:42 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 18:33:49 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 18:11:03 EST)
  • Re: IPSectarianism (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 01:14:48 EST)
  • Re: IP whois info (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 14:25:17 EST)
  • Re: Traffic Analizer (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 23:15:14 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:54:47 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:12:31 EST)
  • Re: OT - VPN help (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 23:57:48 EST)
  • Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 15:48:46 EST)
  • ARIN Person... (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 17:37:20 EST)
  • Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (Mon Jan 01 2001 - 04:46:55 EST)
• (no name)
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS - Diodes (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 15:15:24 EST)
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 10:33:35 EST)
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 10:13:40 EST)
  • beating about the bush (not) (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 23:03:59 EST)
  • calling attention to servers (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 18:56:06 EST)
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 16:32:24 EST)
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 15:58:57 EST)
  • Re: BGP and anycast (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 12:43:15 EST)
  • Re: BGP and anycast (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 13:19:40 EST)
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 11:34:10 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 02:55:31 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 21:48:54 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 17:28:30 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 15:50:30 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 04:08:38 EST)
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 23:54:11 EST)
  • Re: DNS availability (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 11:24:14 EST)
  • Re: microsoft explains. again. (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 12:23:05 EST)
  • Re: From Microsoft's site (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 02:57:34 EST)
  • Re: Network diversity Software diversity (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 02:47:32 EST)
  • Re: Incease in latency to TLD servers (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:10:00 EST)
  • charitable organization for the shrinkage of the global routing table (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 14:42:05 EST)
  • Re: charitable organization for the shrinkage of the global routing table (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:18:23 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 02:39:17 EST)
  • Re: From Microsoft's site (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 02:22:29 EST)
  • Re: Maintenance Windows for Networks Spanning Multiple Time Zones (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:37:06 EST)
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:47:18 EST)
  • More intelligent MS/DNS article. (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:49:57 EST)
  • What is going on in the PAC NW (Microsoft Outage) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:50:45 EST)
  • Re: Maintenance Windows for Networks Spanning Multiple Time Zones (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:43:25 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 19:11:30 EST)
  • Re: Maintenance Windows for Networks Spanning Multiple Time Zones (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:50:56 EST)
  • Maintenance Windows for Networks Spanning Multiple Time Zones (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:26:29 EST)
  • Re: Wierd Route (fwd) (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:49:34 EST)
  • Cisco PIX (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 06:39:19 EST)
  • Re: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 23:06:38 EST)
  • Re: Forcasts, why won't anyone believe them? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 10:08:45 EST)
  • Re: California regulators ordered rolling blackouts (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 18:12:20 EST)
  • Re: California regulators ordered rolling blackouts (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 19:07:15 EST)
  • Re: Forcasts, why won't anyone believe them? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 03:26:09 EST)
  • Re: [Possible OT] California, and running off of generators for extended periods (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:48:15 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 09:16:32 EST)
  • Peering Disputes (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 23:13:05 EST)
  • Re: California hits stage 3 power emergency (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 18:18:22 EST)
  • Re: IPIP-tunnel with 1500 MTU (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 13:56:12 EST)
  • Re: Original peering policies (com-priv archives?) (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:05:07 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:09:18 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:43:03 EST)
  • Re: OT - VPN help (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:37:17 EST)
  • Re: (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 01:18:47 EST)
  • Re: (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 00:54:46 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 21:44:25 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 21:50:53 EST)
  • Re: Exchange point networks (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:52:00 EST)
  • Re: Operate until failure (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:42:48 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:58:10 EST)
  • Re: Exchange point networks (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:20:33 EST)
  • Re: Exchange point networks (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:31:27 EST)
  • (no subject) (Sat Jan 06 2001 - 06:08:39 EST)
  • Re: How can we provide enough IP address to MAN network (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 20:21:21 EST)
  • ADSL Info (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 23:15:38 EST)
  • Re: fwd ppml: ARIN asking about SWIP procedures (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 15:50:09 EST)
  • Re: fwd ppml: ARIN asking about SWIP procedures (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 13:53:52 EST)
  • IP Multicasting (Mon Jan 01 2001 - 07:55:24 EST)
• abha
  • RE: multiple origin ASes (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 03:06:52 EST)
  • multiple origin ASes (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 19:01:52 EST)
  • RE: Exchange point networks (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:04:34 EST)
  • Re: Exchange point networks (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:12:47 EST)
  • Follow-up to "EGP/Peering survey" (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 04:41:18 EST)
• abt
  • Re: Cisco PIX (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 12:47:52 EST)
• Adam McKenna
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 19:48:08 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 19:09:06 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 17:35:25 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 17:18:45 EST)
  • Re: FTP with authentication to RADIUS (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 11:48:34 EST)
• Adam Rothschild
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 11:44:17 EST)
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 19:46:23 EST)
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 01:00:39 EST)
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 23:06:06 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 00:50:37 EST)
  • Re: Who is in NY ? (was: IX-'s) (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 21:39:25 EST)
  • Re: How can we provide enough IP address to MAN network (Mon Jan 01 2001 - 18:58:13 EST)
• Adrian Chadd
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 16:11:27 EST)
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 15:30:17 EST)
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 15:16:54 EST)
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 03:14:14 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 06:17:15 EST)
  • Re: What is going on in the PAC NW (Microsoft Outage) (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 04:15:47 EST)
  • Re: Wierd Route (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 04:29:53 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 18:01:46 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 02:12:44 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 13:34:26 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:54:42 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:49:50 EST)
  • Re: FTP with authentication to RADIUS (Sat Jan 06 2001 - 00:00:03 EST)
• Alan Clegg
  • Re: Anyone using Cingular wireless? (IXO/TAP number request) (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 15:05:23 EST)
  • Anyone using Cingular wireless? (IXO/TAP number request) (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 08:42:54 EST)
• Alex
  • Re: Stream2 (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 23:11:51 EST)
  • Re: traffic stats (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 23:17:26 EST)
  • Re: Forcasts, why won't anyone believe them? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 23:26:08 EST)
  • Re: Who is in NY ? (was: IX-'s) (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 22:18:42 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:31:40 EST)
  • @Home peering contact? (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 21:37:16 EST)
• Alex Bligh
  • Re: charitable organization for the shrinkage of the global routing table (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 17:48:40 EST)
  • Re: The Cidr Report (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 15:18:43 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 13:00:13 EST)
• Alex Kamantauskas
  • Re: From Microsoft's site (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 10:18:53 EST)
• Alex Pilosov
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 00:42:20 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 18:42:47 EST)
  • Re: Access Numbers [OT] (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 13:16:00 EST)
• Alex Rubenstein
  • OT: Go-Karting in Montreal (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 10:42:47 EST)
• Alison Gudgeon
  • RE: More 6509 problems... (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 11:58:13 EST)
  • RE: More 6509 problems... (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 11:50:25 EST)
  • RE: More 6509 problems... (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 11:36:02 EST)
  • More 6509 problems... (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 11:18:12 EST)
  • RE: Cat. 6509 - Foundry Server Iron Interoperability (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 13:18:37 EST)
  • Cat. 6509 - Foundry Server Iron Interoperability (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 12:44:40 EST)
• Andrei Robachevsky
  • Re: IP whois info (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 12:46:59 EST)
• Andrew Brown
  • Re: FTP with authentication to RADIUS (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 19:10:04 EST)
  • Re: FTP with authentication to RADIUS (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 10:27:59 EST)
  • Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 11:47:23 EST)
• Andrew McNamara
  • Re: FBI and new year's eve DOS (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 00:18:50 EST)
• Andrew Partan
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 22:52:57 EST)
• Andy
  • Re: The unwashed and unaggregated (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 09:49:37 EST)
  • Re: More intelligent MS/DNS article. (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 03:06:12 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:37:15 EST)
  • Re: More intelligent MS/DNS article. (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:37:39 EST)
• Andy Walden
  • Re: PSI as transit carrier (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 17:54:35 EST)
  • Re: Operate until failure (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 10:27:07 EST)
• Anne Marcel
  • Re: Tricky BGP into IGP Question (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:33:00 EST)
  • RE: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Wa s: net.terrorism) (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 19:00:20 EST)
  • Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Was: net.terrorism) (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 13:22:38 EST)
  • How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Was: net.terrorism) (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 09:37:12 EST)
• Avi Freedman
  • Re: Hanging SMTP sessions... (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 15:18:14 EST)
• Avleen Vig
  • Re: Wierd portscans (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 21:26:01 EST)
• Bala Rajagopalan
  • MPLS deployment (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 17:11:57 EST)
• Barrows, Jeff
  • UUNET peering policy (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 11:32:18 EST)
  • RE: florida ix(en) facing south (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 19:07:27 EST)
• Barry Raveendran Greene
  • RE: Tricky BGP into IGP Question (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 21:40:17 EST)
  • RE: should use firewall when peering? (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 12:10:49 EST)
  • RE: (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:08:59 EST)
  • RE: Exchange point networks (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:29:49 EST)
  • RE: Exchange point networks (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:15:05 EST)
  • RE: IXPs and answers to your questions .... (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:10:46 EST)
  • RE: (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:10:40 EST)
• Basil Kruglov
  • Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 16:44:30 EST)
  • Re: nobody @home (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:15:45 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 23:43:01 EST)
• Bennett Todd
  • from : SWIP policy resolution (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 09:37:04 EST)
  • Re: Operate until failure (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 19:08:07 EST)
  • fwd ppml: ARIN asking about SWIP procedures (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 12:27:18 EST)
  • Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 11:00:28 EST)
• bgp4cn
  • should use firewall when peering? (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 08:47:47 EST)
• Bill Fumerola
  • Re: Stream2 (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 22:18:02 EST)
  • Re: What is going on in the PAC NW (Microsoft Outage) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:04:10 EST)
• Bill Nickless
  • Re: Cat. 6509 - Foundry Server Iron Interoperability (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 12:58:16 EST)
  • Re: Exchange point peering (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 15:36:22 EST)
  • Re: SSM vs MSDP (was: IP Multicasting) (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 13:48:00 EST)
  • SSM vs MSDP (was: IP Multicasting) (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 16:54:01 EST)
• Bill Woodcock
  • Re: DNS availability (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 01:32:27 EST)
  • Re: DNS availability (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 00:55:21 EST)
  • Re: Network diversity Software diversity (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 23:59:15 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 23:49:10 EST)
  • Re: [Possible OT] California, and running off of generators for extended periods (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:48:24 EST)
  • Re: [Possible OT] California, and running off of generators for extended periods (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:29:01 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:54:28 EST)
  • Re: Exchange point networks (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 13:04:04 EST)
  • Re: (Sat Jan 06 2001 - 13:41:27 EST)
• Bora Akyol
  • Re: California regulators ordered rolling blackouts (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:50:13 EST)
  • Re: Access Numbers (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 23:19:24 EST)
  • Re: DNS requests from 209.67.50.203 (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 23:38:11 EST)
• BrandonButterworth
  • Re: SSM vs MSDP (was: IP Multicasting) (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 03:11:53 EST)
• Brett Frankenberger
  • Re: History: lengthy outages (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:40:57 EST)
  • Re: SLC power failures (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 10:17:00 EST)
• Brett L. Hawn
  • RE: Maintenance Windows for Networks Spanning Multiple Time Zones (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:20:03 EST)
• Brian
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 16:27:04 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 12:52:42 EST)
  • Re: microsoft explains. again. (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 17:39:53 EST)
  • Re: clue for the clueless please (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:32:37 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:32:47 EST)
  • Re: Forcasts, why won't anyone believe them? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 22:07:48 EST)
• Brian W.
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 19:50:39 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:56:04 EST)
  • Re: OT - VPN help (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:55:34 EST)
  • Re: FTP with authentication to RADIUS (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 20:50:52 EST)
  • Re: FTP with authentication to RADIUS (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 11:09:14 EST)
• Brian Wallingford
  • RE: Forcasts, why won't anyone believe them? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 02:08:03 EST)
  • Re: Forcasts, why won't anyone believe them? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 22:06:48 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:24:22 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:29:44 EST)
• Bruce A. Mah
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:11:19 EST)
• Bruce Campbell
  • Is there anyone clueful at Conxion ? (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 20:18:51 EST)
• by way of Matthew Zito
  • Re: DNS requests from 209.67.50.203 (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 22:57:20 EST)
• Carol Wadsworth
  • Hotel Room Block Rate for NANOG 21 Expires Jan. 17 (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 09:22:23 EST)
  • NANOG 21 -- Registration Open (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 09:48:42 EST)
• Carter, Gregory
  • RE: netsol and host records. (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 18:59:56 EST)
• Charles Scott
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 12:08:59 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 15:15:21 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 10:58:10 EST)
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:54:51 EST)
  • Re: Network Solutions Bilking ex-customers (Sat Jan 06 2001 - 09:51:41 EST)
• Charles Sprickman
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 02:24:20 EST)
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:51:45 EST)
  • Re: FTP with authentication to RADIUS (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 19:47:17 EST)
• Chin Wey Jake
  • RE: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 09:51:29 EST)
• Chip Sharp
  • DOJ guidelines for electronic surveillance and search & seizure (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 10:35:36 EST)
• Chris Adams
  • Re: Forcasts, why won't anyone believe them? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 23:09:21 EST)
  • Re: Traffic Analizer (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 21:28:03 EST)
  • Re: SLC power failures (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 23:19:21 EST)
• Chris Beggy
  • RE: Forcasts, why won't anyone believe them? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 23:24:10 EST)
  • FBI and new year's eve DOS (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 09:19:25 EST)
• Chris Cappuccio
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:12:36 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:04:00 EST)
• Chris Davis
  • RE: msdn.microsoft.com still won't resolve (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:56:21 EST)
  • msdn.microsoft.com still won't resolve (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:24:57 EST)
  • RE: MS explains (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 08:47:12 EST)
  • RE: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:49:00 EST)
• Chris Yarnell
  • Re: m$ blames icann (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:56:46 EST)
• Christian Kuhtz
  • RE: Maintenance Windows for Networks Spanning Multiple Time Zones (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 21:20:41 EST)
  • RE: florida ix(en) facing south (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 18:29:25 EST)
• Christian Nielsen
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 00:16:14 EST)
  • Re: peer "sanity" filters - best practices? (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 20:36:18 EST)
  • Re: Favorites (Re: UUNET peering policy) (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:25:50 EST)
  • Re: PSI as transit carrier (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 18:46:07 EST)
• Christopher A. Woodfield
  • Pingable IPs on backbones? (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 16:45:36 EST)
  • Re: Static IP distribution (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 10:35:41 EST)
• Christopher Ambler
  • Re: Uunet changing (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 01:29:06 EST)
• Christopher L. Morrow
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 16:37:15 EST)
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 16:31:30 EST)
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 16:24:20 EST)
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 15:45:29 EST)
• Clayton Fiske
  • Re: Stream2 (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 00:10:14 EST)
  • Re: History: lengthy outages (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 03:39:41 EST)
  • Re: What is going on in the PAC NW (Microsoft Outage) (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 03:10:47 EST)
  • Re: Tricky BGP into IGP Question (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 20:13:39 EST)
  • Re: BGP keepalive/holdtime at GigE exchange (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 17:23:10 EST)
  • Re: BGP keepalive/holdtime at GigE exchange (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 16:04:45 EST)
  • BGP Persistent Route Oscillation Condition (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 23:29:06 EST)
  • Re: BGP Persistent Route Oscillation Condition (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 23:38:19 EST)
• Clemens Zauner
  • Re: msdn.microsoft.com still won't resolve (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:18:28 EST)
• Craig A. Haney
  • (no subject) (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:00:29 EST)
• Craig Holland
  • RE: IPIP-tunnel with 1500 MTU (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 14:35:58 EST)
• Craig Partridge
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:33:20 EST)
• Dalvenjah FoxFire
  • Re: [Possible OT] California, and running off of generators for extended periods (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:07:47 EST)
  • California hits stage 3 power emergency (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 15:37:04 EST)
  • Re: Operate until failure (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:35:19 EST)
• Dan Hollis
  • Re: MS explains (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 23:40:19 EST)
  • m$ blames icann (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:00:49 EST)
  • Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 02:21:38 EST)
  • Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 01:18:18 EST)
  • Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 22:52:46 EST)
  • Re: nobody @home (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:18:07 EST)
• Dana Hudes
  • Re: fwd ppml: ARIN asking about SWIP procedures (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 15:08:10 EST)
• Daniel Golding
  • RE: Original peering policies (com-priv archives?) (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 13:22:26 EST)
• Daniel L. Golding
  • Re: nobody @home (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 15:54:37 EST)
  • Re: Favorites (Re: UUNET peering policy) (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 13:50:35 EST)
  • Re: (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:18:45 EST)
  • Re: (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 23:16:08 EST)
  • Re: (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 23:10:59 EST)
  • Re: IP Multicasting (Mon Jan 01 2001 - 12:21:53 EST)
• Daniel Roesen
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:51:44 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:54:43 EST)
• Daniel Senie
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:48:56 EST)
  • ATT Broadband / RoadRunner Routing Failures (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:04:35 EST)
  • Network Solutions Bilking ex-customers (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 20:02:32 EST)
• Danny McPherson
  • Re: Tricky BGP into IGP Question (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 21:24:33 EST)
  • Re: Favorites (Re: UUNET peering policy) (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 19:39:41 EST)
  • FYI... (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 15:55:02 EST)
• Danny Snyder
  • RE: More 6509 problems... (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 11:49:04 EST)
  • RE: More 6509 problems... (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 11:44:10 EST)
  • RE: More 6509 problems... (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 11:20:39 EST)
• Dave Curado
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 12:26:12 EST)
  • (no subject) (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 22:29:05 EST)
• Dave McKay
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:32:36 EST)
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:22:30 EST)
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:29:30 EST)
  • Re: Cisco PIX (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 06:53:16 EST)
• dave o'leary
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:33:09 EST)
  • Re: Further Internet Metrics (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 10:15:00 EST)
• Dave Rand
  • RE: Forcasts, why won't anyone believe them? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 02:51:27 EST)
• Dave Wardle, Critical Networks, Inc.
  • IPSectarianism (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 21:48:31 EST)
• David Charlap
  • Re: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:24:27 EST)
• David Harmelin
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 10:00:36 EST)
• David Lesher
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 18:40:47 EST)
  • Re: microsoft explains. again. (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 12:27:54 EST)
  • Re: Forcasts, why won't anyone believe them? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 10:31:08 EST)
  • Re: Forcasts, why won't anyone believe them? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 10:22:55 EST)
  • Re: [Possible OT] California, and running off of generators for e (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:48:28 EST)
  • Re: Access Numbers (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 20:33:20 EST)
  • Re: Operate until failure (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:11:20 EST)
  • Re: Operate until failure (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 10:31:03 EST)
  • Re: SLC power failures (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 22:52:21 EST)
• David P. Maynard
  • peer "sanity" filters - best practices? (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:06:25 EST)
• deeann mikula
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 20:25:40 EST)
  • Re: Access Numbers [OT] (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 07:53:19 EST)
• Deepak Jain
  • RE: BGP keepalive/holdtime at GigE exchange (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 15:23:51 EST)
  • RE: BGP keepalive/holdtime at GigE exchange (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 14:48:03 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:48:01 EST)
• Derek J. Balling
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:22:16 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:00:53 EST)
• Deron J. Ringen
  • RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 13:49:46 EST)
  • RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 09:02:37 EST)
• Dmitri Krioukov
  • RE: multiple origin ASes (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 23:12:22 EST)
• Douglas A. Dever
  • Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 15:37:34 EST)
• Elizabeth Schwartz
  • Before everyone asks me at once - Genuity site (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 23:15:04 EST)
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 22:25:16 EST)
• Elric
  • Wierd portscans (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 18:12:42 EST)
• Eric A. Hall
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 04:36:42 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 20:59:52 EST)
  • MS explains (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 23:14:09 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 18:30:27 EST)
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:32:21 EST)
  • Re: Name server problems? or did Microsoft forget to pay their billagain? (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 02:50:54 EST)
  • Re: IP whois info (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 15:27:14 EST)
  • Re: Operate until failure (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:49:15 EST)
  • Re: fwd ppml: ARIN asking about SWIP procedures (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 13:20:18 EST)
  • Re: fwd ppml: ARIN asking about SWIP procedures (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 14:53:10 EST)
• Eric Germann
  • RE: Network diversity Software diversity (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 07:21:04 EST)
  • RE: Network diversity Software diversity (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 20:59:50 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:02:05 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:47:07 EST)
• Eric Lemond
  • Further Internet Metrics (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 11:10:27 EST)
• Eric Sobocinski
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 13:40:38 EST)
  • Re: Static IP distribution (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 23:16:00 EST)
  • Re: Static IP distribution (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 00:27:07 EST)
  • Re: charitable organization for the shrinkage of the global routing table (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 11:12:18 EST)
• Eric Whitehill
  • Re: Operate until failure (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:49:17 EST)
• Fletcher E Kittredge
  • Re: SLC power failures (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 08:07:38 EST)
• Frank Coluccio
  • RE: Labeling and naming (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:04:38 EST)
  • RE: Labeling and naming (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 11:33:53 EST)
• Gerry Boudreaux
  • [OT]Re: Uunet changing (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 15:22:28 EST)
• Greg A.
  • Re: Greg, you're tryin' too hard (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 04:06:16 EST)
• Greg A. Woods
  • Re: BIND-9 vs. BIND-8 config incompatabilities continued.... (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 16:47:00 EST)
  • Re: Greg, you're tryin' too hard (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 16:57:47 EST)
  • RE: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 19:14:31 EST)
  • RE: How (un)common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 18:37:56 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 18:44:40 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 17:30:47 EST)
  • Re: Hidden name servers? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 17:21:50 EST)
  • Re: From Microsoft's site (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 01:14:34 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:15:55 EST)
  • Re: MS explains (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:20:34 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:01:00 EST)
  • Re: Monitoring highly redundant operations (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 02:01:08 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 01:26:23 EST)
  • Re: Network diversity Software diversity (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 00:46:46 EST)
  • Re: Monitoring highly redundant operations (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:49:01 EST)
  • RE: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 18:01:29 EST)
  • Re: Name server problems? or did Microsoft forget to pay their bill again? (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 03:21:47 EST)
  • Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 14:28:38 EST)
  • Re: IP whois info (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 02:41:07 EST)
  • Re: FTP with authentication to RADIUS (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 17:04:59 EST)
• Gregory Soo
  • RE: UUNET peering policy (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 09:41:46 EST)
• Hal Murray
  • Re: Favorites (Re: UUNET peering policy) (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:41:59 EST)
• Hank Nussbacher
  • Re: Stream2 (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 04:24:18 EST)
  • Re: CIDR and aggregation offenders (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 01:33:58 EST)
  • Uunet changing (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 00:58:42 EST)
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 02:27:26 EST)
  • Re: charitable organization for the shrinkage of the global routing table (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 02:05:59 EST)
  • Re: What is going on in the PAC NW (Microsoft Outage) (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 07:49:16 EST)
  • Re: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 08:16:37 EST)
  • Re: FBI and new year's eve DOS (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 13:05:04 EST)
  • Re: IP whois info (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 02:14:36 EST)
  • IP whois info (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 08:57:47 EST)
  • Re: SSM vs MSDP (was: IP Multicasting) (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 02:28:11 EST)
  • Packeteer (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 06:16:33 EST)
• Havard Eidnes
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 17:53:54 EST)
• Henry R. Linneweh
  • Not a good day now stuff from here is on BBC (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 11:25:19 EST)
  • Re: Stream2 (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 02:59:22 EST)
  • Re: Involuntary outages may start at 7am PST (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 04:46:35 EST)
  • I wonder if this is why above.net took the action it did (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 02:08:56 EST)
  • Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Was: net.terrorism) (Sun Jan 14 2001 - 11:26:13 EST)
  • Re: FBI and new year's eve DOS (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 14:11:48 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 04:23:13 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 03:17:39 EST)
  • Re: Network Solutions Bilking ex-customers (Sat Jan 06 2001 - 10:36:27 EST)
• Henry Yen
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 23:43:38 EST)
  • Re: Monitoring highly redundant operations (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 23:29:15 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 22:22:46 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 20:42:37 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 20:30:12 EST)
  • Re: Monitoring highly redundant operations (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 20:09:19 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 20:33:14 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:24:52 EST)
  • Re: Operate until failure (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:51:13 EST)
• Howard C. Berkowitz
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 01:07:56 EST)
  • Re: Monitoring highly redundant operations (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 23:14:05 EST)
  • Re: Monitoring highly redundant operations (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 23:23:11 EST)
  • Re: m$ blames icann (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:35:26 EST)
  • Re: CAIS DSL failure: lessons in how not to inform (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:14:31 EST)
  • CAIS DSL failure: lessons in how not to inform (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 11:08:28 EST)
  • Re: Exchange point networks (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 21:48:10 EST)
  • Re: Exchange point networks (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:17:40 EST)
• Hugh Irvine
  • Re: FTP with authentication to RADIUS (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 17:24:36 EST)
• Ian A Finlay
  • Re: From Microsoft's site (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 21:18:42 EST)
  • Re: traffic stats (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 21:59:20 EST)
  • traffic stats (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 21:14:49 EST)
• Ian MacKinnon
  • Re: Labeling and naming (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:18:18 EST)
• Irwin Lazar
  • RE: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 22:45:54 EST)
  • RE: Online BGP study material for newbies (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 13:20:56 EST)
  • RE: MPLS deployment (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 17:44:10 EST)
• J. Scott Marcus
  • Re: Original peering policies (com-priv archives?) (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 14:40:31 EST)
• J.D. Falk
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 15:20:37 EST)
  • Re: CAIS DSL failure: lessons in how not to inform (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:40:11 EST)
• Jake
  • Re: MPLS deployment (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 01:32:27 EST)
• James Harkins
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:33:41 EST)
• James R Grinter
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 09:20:23 EST)
• James S. Smith
  • Sprint/ILAP problems in Toronto (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 14:51:12 EST)
• jamie rishaw
  • Re: Stream2 (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 22:03:54 EST)
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 14:35:02 EST)
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 06:07:09 EST)
  • Re: Six million ways to crash (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 00:31:07 EST)
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 19:38:30 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:08:13 EST)
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:36:49 EST)
• Jan-Ahrent Czmok
  • Who is in NY ? (was: IX-'s) (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 16:18:34 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:01:28 EST)
• Jared Mauch
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 16:34:13 EST)
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 16:25:00 EST)
  • Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 20:03:34 EST)
  • Re: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 19:53:01 EST)
  • Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 22:59:06 EST)
  • Re: DNS requests from 209.67.50.203 (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 20:32:55 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:10:55 EST)
  • Re: SSM vs MSDP (was: IP Multicasting) (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 01:21:59 EST)
  • Re: IP Multicasting (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 13:45:53 EST)
• Jason Blakey
  • Hanging SMTP sessions... (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 10:49:21 EST)
• Jason Legate
  • Re: Stream2 (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 23:06:52 EST)
  • Stream2 (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 21:42:23 EST)
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 14:45:03 EST)
• Jason Lewis
  • RE: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 20:43:02 EST)
• Jason Lixfeld
  • RE: Labeling and naming (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:06:33 EST)
  • PSI as transit carrier (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 16:46:50 EST)
• Jason Slagle
  • Re: FBI and new year's eve DOS (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 09:54:55 EST)
• Jason Whiting
  • Providers in Japan (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 18:32:05 EST)
• Jay R. Ashworth
  • Re: Labeling and naming (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 16:29:44 EST)
  • Re: Greg, you're tryin' too hard (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 17:10:05 EST)
  • Re: Greg, you're tryin' too hard (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 10:33:34 EST)
  • Greg, you're tryin' too hard (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 11:08:12 EST)
  • Anyone from nasa.gov around? (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 11:12:29 EST)
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 01:36:50 EST)
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 01:00:32 EST)
  • Re: Static IP distribution (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 00:39:56 EST)
  • Re: Static IP distribution (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 23:36:53 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 21:57:00 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 21:43:39 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 21:49:22 EST)
  • Re: How (un)common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 21:52:22 EST)
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 21:34:22 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 21:48:15 EST)
  • Re: DNS availability (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 11:48:13 EST)
• Jayson Agagnier
  • Re: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:53:41 EST)
  • Re: Montreal power failure (north america) (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 01:42:50 EST)
  • Re: California regulators ordered rolling blackouts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 00:29:19 EST)
• Jeff Barrows
  • Re: Further Internet Metrics (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 16:52:20 EST)
• Jeff Cours
  • Re: Forcasts, why won't anyone believe them? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 19:18:19 EST)
• Jeff Frost
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:32:02 EST)
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:53:49 EST)
• Jeff Haas
  • Re: (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 15:18:25 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 15:07:04 EST)
• Jeff Loughridge
  • RE: Sprint / C&W peering issues? (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 16:16:27 EST)
• Jeff Mcadams
  • Re: Dialup congestion and winter weather (fwd) (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 09:37:07 EST)
• Jeff Ogden
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 08:47:47 EST)
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 12:52:25 EST)
• Jeffrey Haas
  • RE: multiple origin ASes (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:19:56 EST)
• Jeffrey Meltzer
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 01:14:05 EST)
  • Re: FW: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 00:54:11 EST)
• Jennifer Swiftlock
  • OSPF/Gated simple exchange (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 15:01:47 EST)
• Jeremy Furr
  • Traffic Analizer (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 15:39:14 EST)
  • RE: public route servers (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 09:11:26 EST)
• Jeremy Randall
  • From Microsoft's site (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 23:20:57 EST)
• Jerry Scharf
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 22:12:40 EST)
  • Re: [Possible OT] California, and running off of generators for extended periods (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:28:38 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 14:43:31 EST)
• Jesper Skriver
  • Re: route reflectors (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 16:49:05 EST)
• Jim Dixon
  • Re: Exchange point networks (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 03:12:19 EST)
• Jim Duncan
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 21:30:33 EST)
  • Re: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 21:05:02 EST)
• Jim Mercer
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 17:55:24 EST)
  • RFC 2182 was: Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:06:47 EST)
  • text messaging in pakistan (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:45:02 EST)
  • Re: nobody @home (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:10:18 EST)
  • CANTAT2 break? problems? (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 16:39:23 EST)
• Joe Blanchard
  • MS DNS (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:17:03 EST)
• Joe Budion
  • Wierd Route (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 03:05:20 EST)
  • FedEx in DC (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 00:23:28 EST)
• Joe McGuckin
  • Re[2]: IX's (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 20:19:55 EST)
• Joel Jaeggli
  • Re: [Possible OT] California, and running off of generators for extended periods (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:56:20 EST)
• John Belcher
  • RE: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 15:22:31 EST)
  • RE: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:16:27 EST)
  • RE: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:45:53 EST)
• John Fraizer
  • Re: Network diversity Software diversity (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 13:34:52 EST)
  • Re: Involuntary outages may start at 7am PST (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 00:15:03 EST)
  • Re: Wierd Route (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 05:56:27 EST)
  • Re: Wierd Route (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 04:56:14 EST)
  • Re: Where's my FedEx package (Washington DC saturday) (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 03:20:11 EST)
  • Re: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 22:53:37 EST)
  • Re: Forcasts, why won't anyone believe them? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 23:22:22 EST)
  • Re: [Possible OT] California, and running off of generators for extended periods (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:18:34 EST)
  • Re: [Possible OT] California, and running off of generators for extended periods (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:48:52 EST)
  • Re: Favorites (Re: UUNET peering policy) (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 20:36:42 EST)
  • Re: BGP Filtering (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 06:15:25 EST)
  • RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (Mon Jan 01 2001 - 03:00:25 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 00:58:10 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 02:25:09 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 14:06:36 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 05:05:31 EST)
  • RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (Mon Jan 01 2001 - 04:14:13 EST)
  • RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (Mon Jan 01 2001 - 03:41:22 EST)
  • Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (Mon Jan 01 2001 - 03:32:13 EST)
  • Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (Mon Jan 01 2001 - 03:27:25 EST)
• John Hawkinson
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 22:18:22 EST)
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 19:09:22 EST)
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 18:52:11 EST)
  • Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (Mon Jan 01 2001 - 10:57:50 EST)
  • Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (Mon Jan 01 2001 - 01:30:03 EST)
• john heasley
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Sun Jan 14 2001 - 14:00:08 EST)
• John Kristoff
  • Re: From Microsoft's site (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 10:48:39 EST)
  • Re: Labeling and naming (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:02:14 EST)
  • DNS requests from 209.67.50.203 (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 18:50:27 EST)
• John Osmon
  • Re: Wierd Route (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:17:42 EST)
• John Paul Martin
  • Re: Access Numbers (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 00:15:40 EST)
  • Access Numbers (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 01:42:00 EST)
• John Payne
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 12:40:36 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 08:33:29 EST)
  • Re: MS explains (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 20:51:52 EST)
  • Re: MS explains (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:29:37 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 00:10:54 EST)
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 03:45:56 EST)
  • Re: Name server problems? or did Microsoft forget to pay their bill again? (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 02:22:09 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 17:49:18 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 20:42:24 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:24:45 EST)
• John Todd
  • Re: CAIS DSL failure: lessons in how not to inform (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:43:33 EST)
• Jon Stanley
  • RE: Labeling and naming (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 03:02:36 EST)
  • Re: Wierd Route (fwd) (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:12:47 EST)
  • Re: Wierd Route (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 04:13:39 EST)
  • Re: Wierd Route (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 03:47:28 EST)
  • [A little OT] Re: nobody @home (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 03:38:28 EST)
  • BGP Filtering (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 03:20:18 EST)
  • Re: as-path filtering (Sat Jan 06 2001 - 06:15:06 EST)
• Joseph T. Klein
  • Microsoft DNS outage (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 20:36:35 EST)
• Josh Richards
  • Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 18:58:34 EST)
  • Re: IX's (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 16:23:28 EST)
  • Re: Traffic Analizer (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 19:09:25 EST)
  • Re: Operate until failure (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:58:32 EST)
• Joshua Goodall
  • Re: Uunet changing (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 10:06:20 EST)
  • Naming drivel (was: RE: How common is lack of DNS server diversity?) (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 19:15:16 EST)
  • RE: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 06:35:55 EST)
  • Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Was: net.terrorism) (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 15:13:35 EST)
  • Communities for blackholes (was: re: net.terrorism) (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 10:55:40 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:49:41 EST)
• joshua stein
  • Re: FTP with authentication to RADIUS (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 13:28:44 EST)
  • Re: FTP with authentication to RADIUS (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 14:04:34 EST)
• Justin Hinderliter
  • Re: Wierd portscans (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 20:45:48 EST)
  • Re: Wierd portscans (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 20:44:08 EST)
• Justin W. Newton
  • Re: [Fwd: Monitoring highly redundant operations] (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 14:27:52 EST)
• Karel Chvalovsky
  • Re: msdn.microsoft.com still won't resolve (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:10:28 EST)
• Karyn Ulriksen
  • RE: Incease in latency to TLD servers (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 17:50:43 EST)
  • RE: California -- STAGE 3 POWER EMERGENCY... AGAIN (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:33:50 EST)
  • SOLARMAX and Power Interruptions (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:40:05 EST)
  • RE: [Possible OT] California, and running off of generators for e xtended periods (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:42:47 EST)
• Kavi, Prabhu
  • RE: [OT]: Involuntary outages may start at 7am PST (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:25:43 EST)
  • [OT]: Involuntary outages may start at 7am PST (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 11:06:07 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:25:20 EST)
• ken harris.
  • Re: Name server problems? or did Microsoft forget to pay their billagain? (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 11:51:28 EST)
• Kevin Facinelli
  • Power and Heat Analysis for Equipment (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:56:05 EST)
  • Information Sharing (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 13:05:04 EST)
  • Re: IP Multicasting (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 14:38:34 EST)
• Kevin Houle
  • Re: DNS requests from 209.67.50.203 (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 09:36:27 EST)
• Kevin Oberman
  • Re: [OT]: Involuntary outages may start at 7am PST (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:55:08 EST)
  • Re: [OT]: Involuntary outages may start at 7am PST (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:03:32 EST)
• Kris S. Amundson
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 03:19:59 EST)
  • Static IP distribution (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 19:37:20 EST)
• Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • Re: Labeling and naming (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 05:34:19 EST)
  • Re: Labeling and naming (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 05:27:50 EST)
  • Re: Maintenance Windows for Networks Spanning Multiple Time Zones (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 03:20:18 EST)
  • Labeling and naming (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 09:20:56 EST)
• Kurt Kayser
  • Re: California -- STAGE 3 POWER EMERGENCY... AGAIN (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 10:15:49 EST)
• L. Sassaman
  • Re: Name server problems? or did Microsoft forget to pay their billagain? (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:03:58 EST)
• Lane Patterson
  • RE: BGP keepalive/holdtime at GigE exchange (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 20:02:12 EST)
  • RE: BGP keepalive/holdtime at GigE exchange (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 14:59:38 EST)
  • RE: BGP keepalive/holdtime at GigE exchange (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 13:49:02 EST)
  • FW: BGP keepalive/holdtime at GigE exchange (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 01:07:47 EST)
• Leo Bicknell
  • Re: Favorites (Re: UUNET peering policy) (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:17:47 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 21:47:49 EST)
  • Re: Exchange point networks (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 19:07:53 EST)
• Lionel Lauer
  • Online BGP study material for newbies (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 09:07:05 EST)
  • Re: Network Solutions Bilking ex-customers (Sun Jan 07 2001 - 19:35:17 EST)
• Lloyd Taylor
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:34:02 EST)
• Lucy E. Lynch
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:25:33 EST)
• Lyndon Nerenberg
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 15:05:08 EST)
• M. David Leonard
  • Re: Incease in latency to TLD servers (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:34:46 EST)
• M.I. Deen
  • Re: OT - VPN help (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 20:54:44 EST)
• Majdi S. Abbas
  • Broadwing Fiber cut, El Paso, TX (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:05:12 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policyy (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 05:47:08 EST)
• Marc MERLIN
  • Re: netsol and host records. (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 19:30:01 EST)
  • OT: netsol and host records. (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 18:03:13 EST)
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 04:48:34 EST)
• Marc Slemko
  • Re: BGP and anycast (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 12:58:21 EST)
  • microsoft explains. again. (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 20:51:40 EST)
• Marc Williams
  • as-path filtering (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 11:33:54 EST)
• Marius Strom
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 23:52:18 EST)
  • Re: Favorites (Re: UUNET peering policy) (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:38:44 EST)
• Mark Mentovai
  • Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 15:36:17 EST)
  • Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Was: net.terrorism) (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 13:25:39 EST)
  • Re: BGP Filtering (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 11:05:28 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:35:25 EST)
  • Re: fwd ppml: ARIN asking about SWIP procedures (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 13:56:51 EST)
• Mark Radabaugh
  • RE: DOJ guidelines for electronic surveillance and search & seizure (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:08:11 EST)
  • RE: Access Numbers [OT] (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 09:41:34 EST)
• Marshall Eubanks
  • Re: Uunet changing (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 10:13:08 EST)
  • Re: From Microsoft's site (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 08:11:50 EST)
  • Re: Name server problems? or did Microsoft forget to pay their billagain? (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 06:52:03 EST)
  • Re: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 09:43:18 EST)
  • Re: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 22:27:34 EST)
  • Re: Too big to fail? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 22:02:48 EST)
  • Re: Forcasts, why won't anyone believe them? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 11:30:22 EST)
  • Re: SSM vs MSDP (was: IP Multicasting) (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 06:48:08 EST)
  • Re: SSM vs MSDP (was: IP Multicasting) (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 10:40:03 EST)
  • Re: IP Multicasting (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 14:55:20 EST)
  • Re: IP Multicasting (Mon Jan 01 2001 - 15:51:59 EST)
• Martin Taylor
  • Re: BGP keepalive/holdtime at GigE exchange (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 03:31:35 EST)
• Masataka Ohta
  • Re: BGP and anycast (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 20:28:52 EST)
  • Re: (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 03:52:30 EST)
  • Re: (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 01:21:07 EST)
  • Re: (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 00:49:15 EST)
  • Re: (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 00:35:33 EST)
  • Re: (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 21:05:53 EST)
• Mathew Butler
  • RE: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 18:30:01 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 18:48:58 EST)
  • RE: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Wa s: net.terrorism) (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 17:27:28 EST)
• Matt Clauson
  • Re: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:25:46 EST)
  • Re: California -- STAGE 3 POWER EMERGENCY... AGAIN (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:54:16 EST)
  • Re: California hits stage 3 power emergency (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:20:51 EST)
  • [Possible OT] California, and running off of generators for extended periods (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:30:00 EST)
  • California -- STAGE 3 POWER EMERGENCY... AGAIN (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 10:29:11 EST)
• Matt Levine
  • RE: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 22:55:02 EST)
  • RE: Microsoft DNS outage (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 22:07:59 EST)
  • RE: Name server problems? or did Microsoft forget to pay their billagain? (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 03:23:19 EST)
  • RE: Sprint / C&W peering issues? (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 19:28:16 EST)
  • RE: Sprint Pennsauken.. (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 00:40:02 EST)
  • Sprint Pennsauken.. (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 22:20:38 EST)
  • RE: Cogent? (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 21:05:30 EST)
• Matt Zimmerman
  • Re: Labeling and naming (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 03:06:43 EST)
  • Re: Broadwing Fiber cut, El Paso, TX (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 00:51:57 EST)
• Matthew Kaufman
  • RE: [OT]: Involuntary outages may start at 7am PST (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 05:40:55 EST)
  • Second, make that Third day of rolling blackouts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:34:37 EST)
  • time zones (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 09:01:32 EST)
  • Re: California regulators ordered rolling blackouts (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:30:25 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 06:59:26 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 06:00:09 EST)
  • Re: California regulators ordered rolling blackouts (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 20:48:44 EST)
  • Re: [Possible OT] California, and running off of generators for extended periods (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 04:49:00 EST)
• Matthew S. Hallacy
  • Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 02:32:10 EST)
• Matthew Zito
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 15:13:35 EST)
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 14:12:54 EST)
• michael
  • Re: Cat. 6509 - Foundry Server Iron Interoperability (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 12:55:27 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:51:45 EST)
• Michael Long
  • DSL Lite (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 13:46:15 EST)
• Michael Medwid
  • FTP with authentication to RADIUS (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 13:01:02 EST)
• Michael Shields
  • Re: Labeling and naming (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 11:16:20 EST)
• Miguel A.L. Paraz
  • Re: route reflectors (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 18:16:54 EST)
• Mikael Abrahamsson
  • Re: Favorites (Re: UUNET peering policy) (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 14:53:33 EST)
  • Re: IPIP-tunnel with 1500 MTU (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 15:00:58 EST)
  • RE: IPIP-tunnel with 1500 MTU (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 14:37:15 EST)
  • Re: IPIP-tunnel with 1500 MTU (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 14:35:13 EST)
  • IPIP-tunnel with 1500 MTU (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 12:44:22 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 15:52:56 EST)
• Mike Hughes
  • Re: Online BGP study material for newbies (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 17:33:45 EST)
• Mike Jackson
  • MRTG and BB for sensorArray? (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 14:32:57 EST)
• Mike Johnson
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 10:50:49 EST)
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 23:08:42 EST)
• Mike Lewinski
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:10:22 EST)
• Mike Schoenecker
  • RE: BGP and anycast (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 00:35:16 EST)
• Miles Fidelman
  • Re: Anyone using Cingular wireless? (IXO/TAP number request) (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 11:43:55 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:35:15 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:11:35 EST)
• Morris Allen
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:35:37 EST)
• Mr. James W. Laferriere
  • Address of UU.net's pop in Buffalo , NY ? Tia (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 14:09:23 EST)
• Nathan Stratton
  • Re: Broadwing Fiber cut, El Paso, TX (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 22:36:41 EST)
  • Re: Involuntary outages may start at 7am PST (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 22:27:27 EST)
  • Re: Operate until failure (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:19:38 EST)
• Neil J. McRae
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 16:06:00 EST)
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 15:11:03 EST)
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 14:58:23 EST)
  • Re: Exchange point networks (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 03:57:41 EST)
  • Re: as-path filtering (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 14:36:09 EST)
  • Re: IP Multicasting (Mon Jan 01 2001 - 08:07:59 EST)
• Omachonu Ogali
  • Re: MS explains (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 08:25:05 EST)
  • Re: PSI as transit carrier (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 18:00:35 EST)
• Owen DeLong
  • RE: Labeling and naming (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:24:05 EST)
• Patrick Evans
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 12:41:31 EST)
• Patrick Greenwell
  • The unwashed and unaggregated (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:45:38 EST)
  • Re: Labeling and naming (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 11:43:10 EST)
  • Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 23:49:06 EST)
  • Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 15:05:06 EST)
  • Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 14:11:55 EST)
  • Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:59:56 EST)
  • Re: Backbone recommendations / Cleardata long-haul? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:06:30 EST)
• Patrick Hollowell
  • Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 20:25:52 EST)
• Patrick W. Gilmore
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:38:22 EST)
• Paul A Vixie
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 13:02:46 EST)
  • sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 00:47:08 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 07:51:32 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 07:37:37 EST)
• Paul Donner
  • Re: Tricky BGP into IGP Question (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 01:51:43 EST)
• Paul Timmins
  • Re: Stream2 (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 14:26:49 EST)
  • Re: Operate until failure (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:58:07 EST)
• Paul Vixie
  • Re: calling attention to servers (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 12:51:48 EST)
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 16:09:50 EST)
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 13:47:17 EST)
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 00:54:31 EST)
  • Re: Incease in latency to TLD servers (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 19:04:10 EST)
  • Re: Favorites (Re: UUNET peering policy) (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 01:49:18 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 01:57:39 EST)
  • Re: Favorites (Re: UUNET peering policy) (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 01:37:31 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 02:31:25 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Sun Jan 14 2001 - 04:24:32 EST)
  • Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Wa (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 19:59:43 EST)
  • Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Was: net.terrorism) (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 12:57:07 EST)
  • Re: IX's (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 18:44:05 EST)
• Pete Ashdown
  • Backbone recommendations / Cleardata long-haul? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:49:47 EST)
• Pete Ehlke
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 19:51:02 EST)
• Peter Bierman
  • Re: Forcasts, why won't anyone believe them? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 02:54:40 EST)
• Peter Galbavy
  • Re: Uunet changing (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 04:13:49 EST)
  • Re: clue for the clueless please (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 08:59:41 EST)
  • Re: clue for the clueless please (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:55:05 EST)
  • clue for the clueless please (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 05:36:33 EST)
• Philippe Landau
  • nobody @home (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:02:03 EST)
• Pim van Riezen
  • Re: [NANOG] Pingable IPs on backbones? (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 18:18:15 EST)
  • Re: [NANOG] Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 16:25:11 EST)
• Przemyslaw Karwasiecki
  • RE: Microsoft DNS outage (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 23:52:03 EST)
  • RE: Labeling and naming (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:36:29 EST)
  • RE: florida ix(en) facing south (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 16:53:38 EST)
• Quark Physics
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 21:27:22 EST)
  • Re: How can we provide enough IP address to MAN network (Mon Jan 01 2001 - 14:51:22 EST)
• Ran Atkinson
  • Re: How can we provide enough IP address to MAN network (Mon Jan 01 2001 - 09:24:33 EST)
• Randy Bush
  • Re: MS explains (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 11:46:32 EST)
  • Re: History: lengthy outages (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 05:20:49 EST)
  • Re: More intelligent MS/DNS article. (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 01:33:32 EST)
  • Re: multiple origin ASes (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 08:16:11 EST)
  • Re: Sprint Pennsauken.. (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 00:35:14 EST)
  • Re: Backbone recommendations / Cleardata long-haul? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:40:30 EST)
  • Re: Exchange point networks (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 19:51:42 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 14:35:32 EST)
  • RE: (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 12:37:32 EST)
  • Re: (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 03:57:54 EST)
  • RE: Exchange point networks (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 20:35:41 EST)
  • RE: (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 19:12:48 EST)
  • Re: (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 21:41:11 EST)
  • Re: (Sat Jan 06 2001 - 09:36:22 EST)
  • RE: florida ix(en) facing south (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 20:06:15 EST)
  • Re: Follow-up to "EGP/Peering survey" (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 09:50:57 EST)
  • Re: Further Internet Metrics (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 13:05:50 EST)
  • Re: Further Internet Metrics (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 12:54:59 EST)
• Reid B. Fishler
  • Re: Backbone recommendations / Cleardata long-haul? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:54:27 EST)
  • Re: Backbone recommendations / Cleardata long-haul? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:26:58 EST)
• Ren
  • Re: Providers in Japan (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 20:49:33 EST)
• Richard A. Steenbergen
  • Re: Stream2 (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 21:54:16 EST)
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 18:05:11 EST)
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 00:16:33 EST)
  • Re: From Microsoft's site (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 01:49:32 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 02:17:04 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 22:17:19 EST)
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 18:52:57 EST)
  • Re: Wierd Route (fwd) (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 15:18:19 EST)
  • Re: Wierd Route (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 03:52:18 EST)
  • Re: Wierd Route (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 03:32:12 EST)
  • Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 14:42:58 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:46:40 EST)
  • Rolling blackouts and CAISO status (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:42:26 EST)
  • Re: Favorites (Re: UUNET peering policy) (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 22:07:36 EST)
  • Re: Forcasts, why won't anyone believe them? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 19:06:40 EST)
  • Re: [Possible OT] California, and running off of generators for extended periods (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:24:12 EST)
  • RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (Mon Jan 01 2001 - 03:59:49 EST)
  • RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (Mon Jan 01 2001 - 03:33:22 EST)
• Richard Irving
  • Re: Wierd Route (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 05:13:41 EST)
• Richard Welty
  • RE: [Possible OT] California, and running off of generators for e xtended periods (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:11:50 EST)
  • RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 12:06:13 EST)
• Rick Irving
  • peermaker and brain spikes (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 15:58:04 EST)
• Robbie Harrell
  • Exchange point peering (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 15:08:51 EST)
• Robert Beverly
  • Re: Traffic Analizer (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 11:50:50 EST)
• Rodney Joffe
  • Re: DNS availability (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 00:13:15 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Sun Jan 14 2001 - 02:35:26 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 05:20:16 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 00:23:46 EST)
  • Re: Further Internet Metrics (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 13:07:48 EST)
• Roeland Meyer
  • RE: calling attention to servers (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 13:13:45 EST)
  • RE: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 01:00:21 EST)
  • RE: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 23:38:33 EST)
  • RE: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 19:42:00 EST)
  • RE: How (un)common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 19:15:49 EST)
  • RE: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 18:15:00 EST)
  • RE: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 18:23:08 EST)
  • RE: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 17:40:39 EST)
  • RE: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 17:43:28 EST)
  • RE: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 17:34:58 EST)
  • RE: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 16:52:11 EST)
  • RE: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 14:10:34 EST)
  • RE: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 13:38:32 EST)
  • RE: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 13:35:06 EST)
  • RE: DNS availability (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 02:56:38 EST)
  • RE: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 04:24:34 EST)
  • RE: Network diversity Software diversity (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 01:40:50 EST)
  • RE: Network diversity Software diversity (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 03:12:32 EST)
  • RE: From Microsoft's site (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 23:56:28 EST)
  • RE: OUTAGE: Earthlink - more nationwide difficulties (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 14:00:57 EST)
  • RE: OUTAGE: Earthlink - more nationwide difficulties (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 14:00:26 EST)
  • RE: Network diversity Software diversity (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:30:08 EST)
  • RE: From Microsoft's site (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 23:43:34 EST)
  • RE: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 23:39:46 EST)
  • RE: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 23:36:16 EST)
  • RE: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 21:58:55 EST)
  • RE: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 18:02:39 EST)
  • RE: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:09:45 EST)
  • RE: clue for the clueless please (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 11:52:17 EST)
  • RE: Involuntary outages may start at 7am PST (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 01:52:28 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:48:52 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 18:46:00 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:31:33 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 13:45:14 EST)
  • RE: California regulators ordered rolling blackouts (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 18:23:11 EST)
  • RE: California regulators ordered rolling blackouts (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:57:09 EST)
  • RE: Forcasts, why won't anyone believe them? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 22:49:45 EST)
  • RE: Favorites (Re: UUNET peering policy) (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 14:17:36 EST)
  • RE: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Wa s: net.terrorism) (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 18:17:41 EST)
  • RE: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 15:54:43 EST)
  • RE: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 15:23:55 EST)
  • IX's (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 13:10:45 EST)
  • RE: FTP with authentication to RADIUS (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 16:13:07 EST)
  • RE: FTP with authentication to RADIUS (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 03:07:30 EST)
  • RE: Dialup congestion and winter weather (fwd) (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 13:44:27 EST)
  • RE: Dialup congestion and winter weather (fwd) (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 03:18:57 EST)
  • RE: Dialup congestion and winter weather (fwd) (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 01:53:01 EST)
• Roger Choate
  • RE: SSH on other Cisco models (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 00:28:35 EST)
• Roland Dobbins
  • Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 18:48:11 EST)
• Ron da Silva
  • Re: IP Multicasting (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 14:04:10 EST)
  • Re: IP Multicasting (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 13:28:04 EST)
• Roy
  • Re: Blackouts again? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 12:54:07 EST)
  • Blackouts again? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 09:37:44 EST)
  • Re: California -- STAGE 3 POWER EMERGENCY... AGAIN (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 10:52:33 EST)
  • California hits stage 3 power emergency (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:01:53 EST)
• Rusty H. Hodge
  • Re: From Microsoft's site (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 20:53:12 EST)
  • UPDATE:SAN FRANCISCO HIT BY BLACKOUTS - was Re: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 01:40:19 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 01:35:13 EST)
  • California regulators ordered rolling blackouts (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:37:59 EST)
• Ryan O'Connell
  • Re: clue for the clueless please (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:36:53 EST)
  • Re: clue for the clueless please (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:10:14 EST)
  • Re: BGP keepalive/holdtime at GigE exchange (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 17:03:28 EST)
  • Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 05:51:48 EST)
• Sabri Berisha
  • RE: net.terrorism (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 04:20:13 EST)
  • RE: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 11:01:20 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:23:46 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:34:50 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:25:43 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 07:43:50 EST)
  • net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 07:16:17 EST)
• Scott Gifford
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:41:37 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:04:25 EST)
• Scott Madley
  • RE: Incease in latency to TLD servers (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:50:50 EST)
  • RE: Tenure (was Re: MS explains) (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:26:32 EST)
  • RE: Access Numbers [OT] (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 13:06:18 EST)
• scott w
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 18:43:21 EST)
• Sean Capshaw
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 11:16:27 EST)
• Sean Donelan
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 19:15:41 EST)
  • Re: Not a good day now stuff from here is on BBC (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 13:47:50 EST)
  • Month for DNS problems (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 20:24:08 EST)
  • Re: Labeling and naming (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 16:50:00 EST)
  • Sprint reports fewest number of FCC reportable outages (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 15:08:29 EST)
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 04:43:48 EST)
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 21:04:12 EST)
  • Six million ways to crash (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 00:10:43 EST)
  • RE: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 17:33:48 EST)
  • Hidden name servers? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 02:28:06 EST)
  • How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 22:00:54 EST)
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 19:40:04 EST)
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 19:03:55 EST)
  • Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 18:35:50 EST)
  • Estimated Time To Repair (was Re: History: lengthy outages) (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 22:11:35 EST)
  • Incease in latency to TLD servers (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:19:06 EST)
  • Tenure (was Re: MS explains) (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 14:55:45 EST)
  • OUTAGE: Qwest - problem? (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:53:00 EST)
  • Re: History: lengthy outages (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:31:42 EST)
  • OUTAGE: Earthlink - more nationwide difficulties (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:49:13 EST)
  • History: lengthy outages (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 02:45:08 EST)
  • Microsoft Explains Site Access Issues (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 23:44:31 EST)
  • Network diversity Software diversity (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 20:19:29 EST)
  • Re: peer "sanity" filters - best practices? (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:44:26 EST)
  • Kick em while they're down (was Re: Microsoft) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 18:29:36 EST)
  • Monitoring highly redundant operations (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:31:20 EST)
  • Microsoft starts to limp back onto the Internet (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:24:08 EST)
  • Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:40:15 EST)
  • Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 03:17:06 EST)
  • Earthlink - nationwide problems (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 02:30:23 EST)
  • Name server problems? or did Microsoft forget to pay their bill again? (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 02:05:48 EST)
  • Re: Broadwing Fiber cut, El Paso, TX (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 23:10:36 EST)
  • Involuntary outages may start at 7am PST (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 22:13:11 EST)
  • Re: Wierd Route (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 05:30:19 EST)
  • Voluntary cooperation (Re: Inter-provider communications ) (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 03:50:50 EST)
  • More rolling blackouts in California on Sunday (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 20:39:53 EST)
  • Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:21:24 EST)
  • Where's my FedEx package (Washington DC saturday) (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 21:46:48 EST)
  • Too big to fail? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:31:58 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:21:56 EST)
  • California controlled service interruptions suspended for now (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:52:44 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:13:03 EST)
  • Re: Solarmax effects (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:43:02 EST)
  • Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:58:24 EST)
  • Montreal power failure (north america) (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 01:05:22 EST)
  • message from California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:06:51 EST)
  • Re: California hits stage 3 power emergency (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:14:02 EST)
  • Re: Forcasts, why won't anyone believe them? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 23:22:59 EST)
  • Re: [Possible OT] California, and running off of generators for extended periods (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:04:19 EST)
  • Forcasts, why won't anyone believe them? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 18:43:31 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 03:51:33 EST)
  • Re: Favorites (Re: UUNET peering policy) (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 03:46:11 EST)
  • Favorites (Re: UUNET peering policy) (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 13:37:18 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 11:48:03 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 10:47:34 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Sun Jan 14 2001 - 18:33:18 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 22:57:23 EST)
  • Re: Peering Disputes (Sun Jan 14 2001 - 02:35:45 EST)
  • RE: BGP keepalive/holdtime at GigE exchange (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 18:53:20 EST)
  • California CAL-ISO 1500 MW rolling blackouts between 5-8pm (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 18:24:43 EST)
  • Re: California hits stage 3 power emergency (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 16:59:46 EST)
  • Re: should use firewall when peering? (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 12:09:07 EST)
  • Re: should use firewall when peering? (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 12:08:45 EST)
  • Re: IP whois info (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 14:31:35 EST)
  • Original peering policies (com-priv archives?) (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:13:38 EST)
  • Re: Operate until failure (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:35:49 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:25:25 EST)
  • Operate until failure (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 04:40:45 EST)
  • Re: Exchange point networks (Sat Jan 06 2001 - 13:50:04 EST)
  • Pictures of Schenectady NY CO flood? (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 04:34:38 EST)
  • SLC power failures (Wed Jan 03 2001 - 22:38:03 EST)
  • Globally unique versus globally routable (was RE: RFC1918) (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 15:49:22 EST)
  • Re: Dialup congestion and winter weather (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 01:56:26 EST)
• Sean Morrison
  • Re: [Possible OT] California, and running off of generators for extended periods (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:03:25 EST)
• Sebastien Berube
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 14:49:12 EST)
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 11:06:09 EST)
• Shawn McMahon
  • Re: Stream2 (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 10:35:33 EST)
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 16:15:44 EST)
  • Re: Greg, you're tryin' too hard (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 11:23:40 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 19:48:30 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 18:00:18 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 16:32:52 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 08:17:00 EST)
  • Re: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:54:40 EST)
  • Solarmax effects (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:09:03 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:45:39 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 09:44:09 EST)
  • Re: Operate until failure (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 11:32:16 EST)
  • Re: Operate until failure (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 11:29:35 EST)
  • Re: Operate until failure (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 10:11:39 EST)
  • Re: FTP with authentication to RADIUS (Sat Jan 06 2001 - 07:43:53 EST)
• Simon Leinen
  • Re: multiple origin ASes (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 08:01:17 EST)
• Simon Lockhart
  • Re: Not a good day now stuff from here is on BBC (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 13:46:39 EST)
  • Re: Uunet changing (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 10:10:07 EST)
  • Re: Monitoring highly redundant operations (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 18:43:53 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:04:51 EST)
  • MAE-ATM now supports "best effort" PVCs (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 02:03:45 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:09:02 EST)
  • SprintNAP (Sun Jan 07 2001 - 08:47:39 EST)
  • Re: Follow-up to "EGP/Peering survey" (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 05:01:48 EST)
• Simon Lyall
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 16:55:08 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 20:18:20 EST)
• Stephen Burd
  • OT - VPN help (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 17:01:28 EST)
• Stephen Griffin
  • Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (Tue Jan 02 2001 - 23:51:33 EST)
• Stephen J. Wilcox
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:59:19 EST)
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:06:30 EST)
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 04:47:47 EST)
• Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: IPIP-tunnel with 1500 MTU (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 17:52:16 EST)
  • Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (Mon Jan 01 2001 - 06:18:47 EST)
• Stephen Stuart
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 15:38:01 EST)
  • Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? (Mon Jan 01 2001 - 05:37:48 EST)
• Steve Gibbard
  • Re: Dialup congestion and winter weather (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 15:24:17 EST)
• Steve Meuse
  • Re: UUNET peering policy (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 10:21:26 EST)
• Steve Riley (MCS)
  • RE: IPSectarianism (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 23:21:21 EST)
• Steve Sobol
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 22:54:12 EST)
  • Re: Network diversity Software diversity (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 14:37:26 EST)
  • Re: Network diversity Software diversity (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 12:46:28 EST)
  • Re: CAIS DSL failure: lessons in how not to inform (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:00:19 EST)
  • Re: msdn.microsoft.com still won't resolve (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:53:52 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 11:02:03 EST)
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 23:13:12 EST)
  • Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 21:41:49 EST)
  • Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:22:23 EST)
  • Re: Troubles inside ALTER.NET? (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:52:13 EST)
  • Re: Access Numbers (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:48:14 EST)
  • Re: Network Solutions Bilking ex-customers (Sun Jan 07 2001 - 14:25:08 EST)
  • Re: FTP with authentication to RADIUS (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 15:34:59 EST)
• Steven J. Sobol
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:23:31 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:25:20 EST)
  • Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 16:45:29 EST)
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:50:53 EST)
  • Re: FTP with authentication to RADIUS (Thu Jan 04 2001 - 17:34:31 EST)
• Steven M. Bellovin
  • Re: Stream2 (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 22:12:26 EST)
  • Re: Proactive steps to prevent DDOS? (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 14:48:33 EST)
  • Re: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:57:06 EST)
  • Re: Incease in latency to TLD servers (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:19:00 EST)
  • Re: MS explains (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 11:54:07 EST)
  • Re: MS explains (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 09:30:19 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 23:04:55 EST)
  • Re: What is going on in the PAC NW (Microsoft Outage) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:07:22 EST)
  • Ramen Worm (Was: Second day of rolling blackouts starts ) (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 09:49:42 EST)
  • Re: Too big to fail? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 21:29:52 EST)
  • Re: DNS requests from 209.67.50.203 (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 19:24:39 EST)
• Swede
  • RE: BGP and anycast (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 07:05:16 EST)
  • BGP and anycast (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 19:17:50 EST)
• Swinton, Jeff
  • MPLS routing loop (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 17:15:35 EST)
• Thomas Kernen
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 13:50:28 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 22:17:06 EST)
• Tim Wolfe
  • RE: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:57:47 EST)
  • RE: Tricky BGP into IGP Question (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:10:33 EST)
  • Tricky BGP into IGP Question (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 18:26:28 EST)
• Timothy Brown
  • Re: Labeling and naming (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 15:57:12 EST)
  • Cogent? (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 19:16:26 EST)
  • Re: Online BGP study material for newbies (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 14:13:52 EST)
• Timothy J. Salo
  • RE: Forcasts, why won't anyone believe them? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 00:48:12 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 14:41:39 EST)
• Tony Bates
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 15:00:03 EST)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 15:00:04 EST)
  • Re: The Cidr Report (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 03:08:11 EST)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 15:00:04 EST)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Jan 05 2001 - 15:00:02 EST)
• tony bourke
  • Re: Name server problems? or did Microsoft forget to pay their billagain? (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:02:43 EST)
• Tony Mumm
  • route reflectors (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 13:39:19 EST)
• Tony Rall
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 02:11:50 EST)
  • RE: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 14:58:54 EST)
  • Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 14:13:11 EST)
  • RE: How common is lack of DNS server diversity? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 13:54:03 EST)
  • Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:10:29 EST)
  • Re: What is going on in the PAC NW (Microsoft Outage) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:35:28 EST)
• Travis Pugh
  • Re: Favorites (Re: UUNET peering policy) (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 14:31:44 EST)
• Troy Corbin
  • Re: DNS availability (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 01:09:45 EST)
• Tuc
  • Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 19:10:35 EST)
• tv
  • Re: Cisco PIX (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 11:03:30 EST)
• Vadim Antonov
  • Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 01:52:10 EST)
  • Re: (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 06:32:04 EST)
  • Re: (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 21:48:33 EST)
• Vern Paxson
  • Re: DNS requests from 209.67.50.203 (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 21:45:45 EST)
• Vijay Gill
  • Re: History: lengthy outages (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 03:07:27 EST)
  • Re: What is going on in the PAC NW (Microsoft Outage) (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 23:46:26 EST)
  • Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 01:41:23 EST)
• Vincent Gillet
  • Re: peer "sanity" filters - best practices? (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 04:24:57 EST)
• Vincent Power
  • Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenings... (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 01:41:02 EST)
• Vladimir Litovka
  • Troubles inside ALTER.NET? (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 10:16:53 EST)
• Wayne Bouchard
  • Re: Too big to fail? (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 15:21:25 EST)
  • Re: [Possible OT] California, and running off of generators for extended periods (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:52:26 EST)
  • Re: California hits stage 3 power emergency (Thu Jan 11 2001 - 16:50:23 EST)
• William Allen Simpson
  • Re: net.terrorism (Wed Jan 10 2001 - 18:56:07 EST)
  • Re: net.terrorism (Tue Jan 09 2001 - 08:07:48 EST)
• William B. Norton
  • Re: Exchange point networks (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 14:27:04 EST)
• Wilson, David
  • Tiara v. ASC (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 13:35:09 EST)
• Wojtek Zlobicki
  • Re: Hidden name servers? (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 17:44:07 EST)
  • Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 23:16:16 EST)
• Young, Jason
  • RE: Online BGP study material for newbies (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 09:23:51 EST)
• Yu Ning
  • How can we provide enough IP address to MAN network (Mon Jan 01 2001 - 06:54:46 EST)
• Zaid Ali
  • RE: Second day of rolling blackouts starts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:10:32 EST)

Last message date: Sat Feb 24 2001 - 11:08:52 EST
Archived on: Thu Dec 09 2004 - 15:54:18 EST

1088 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
About this archive
Other mail archives