Re: MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION

From: David Diaz (no email)
Date: Mon Nov 13 2000 - 21:28:45 EST


At 8:35 PM -0500 11/13/00, Daniel L. Golding wrote:
>That depends what you consider IOPS to be. Take your choice:
>
>a) Secret internet routing cabal. So secret, no one can figure out what
>they do.

The cabal makes jokes "Officially there is no cabal."
In reality the fact is that peering is a trust event. You are
trusting the engineers at another (competitive) network with
connectivity to yours. This also includes the ability to affect your
network in the most extreme ways. I believe it became human nature
to trust some of the early internet engineers. An engineer with a
track record of running a stable network was worth of trust (ie
peering).

The opposite is also true. Any engineer/network that was constantly
flapping would quickly be likely to be dropped as a peer.

Does this seem unfair?

-- 
Thank you,
David Diaz
Chairman, iCEO
International Wire Communications, Inc.
www.iwcinc.net
305-273-7978
email: 
pager: 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
'How you felt...when you heard my accusers, I do not know, but I 
nearly forgot who I was they were so persuasive.  Yet as for truth 
one might almost say they have spoken not one word of truth.  But 
what most astonished me in the many lies they told was when they 
warned you to take care not to be deceived by me "because I was a 
terrible clever speaker."  They ought to have been ashamed to say it 
because I shall prove them wrong at once by facts when I begin to 
speak and you will see that I am not a bit clever speaker...unless of 
course they call one who speaks the truth a clever speaker.' -- Plato 







Hosted Email Solutions

Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD