From: Adrian Chadd (no email)
Date: Tue Apr 04 2000 - 18:59:06 EDT
On Tue, Apr 04, 2000, John Payne wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 12:15:24AM -0400, Gordon Cook wrote:
> > else. My default mode of operation has always been to keep the
> > identity of the leaker CONFIDENTIAL. It is a subject of interest to
>
> So publishing the leaked note verbatim doesn't strike you as possibly
> disclosing the identity of the leaker to the company that had it leaked?
>
> It seems to me that it would be trivia for exodus or any other company
> to insert uniquely identifying phrases or misspellings, or whatever...
Its the leaker's risk.
Adrian
|
|
|