Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus

From: Mark Borchers (no email)
Date: Tue Apr 04 2000 - 14:59:43 EDT

On 4 Apr 00, at 0:34, wrote:

> If it's merely "PSI refuses to peer directly with Exodus", that's one
> thing. If PSI is also refusing packets carried by some other 3rd party
> that PSI and Exodus both peer with, or alternate routing is failing
> for some other reason, that's a lot worse.
> Does anybody know definitively what the REAL story is?
> Valdis Kletnieks
> Operating Systems Analyst
> Virginia Tech
Here's a non-confidential document which may be relevant:

Note the cost-sharing arrangement built into this peering policy.
Maybe this is somehow related to the parting of ways between PSI
and Exodus.

Hosted Email Solutions

Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs

Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD