From: Maurizio Lo Bosco (no email)
Date: Mon May 19 2008 - 06:18:56 EDT
> > Using the flat configuration for the mailbox.db the slow start
> > disapepars. May I use a flat database for 4300+ mailbox?
> > Do you think I could have other performance problems in
> > delivery/accessing the mailbox?
>
> I considered creating a GFS spool for a 50000 mailbox system, but during
> testing, the GFS lock overhead would've been too much during delivery
> peaks. Probably had to do mostly with delivery.db locking.
so far, with 4300+ users it is safe to use a flat database for the mailbox.db
but I will encounter issues with the delivery.
If I'm not wrong the delivery.db database is reported as duplicate_db in the
imapd.conf and it is not possible to set it as flat. We don't use the
suppression capability of the cyrus ( a bug of the outlook message id in the
read_confirm&reply ) so It could be safe to put 2 separate database on the
local FS. Is this correct?
Regards
Maurizio
---- Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
|
|
|