Re: Sync_client error Hit upload limit 0

From: Ken Murchison (no email)
Date: Wed Apr 02 2008 - 21:37:23 EDT

  • Next message: Stephen Carr: "Re: Sync_client error Hit upload limit 0"

    Are you sure that you installed the new sync_client binary? If the
    patch applied correctly, I don't see how max_count can be reported as zero.

    Stephen Carr wrote:
    > Dear List
    >
    > I have applied the patch on our server and I regret to infom you it does
    > not fix the problem.
    >
    > I still get 1 "error" line this when 2 emails are being delivered at
    > almost the same time.
    >
    > Apr 3 08:42:29 brooks sync_client[4402]: Hit upload limit 0 at UID 22186
    > for user.AAA, sending
    >
    > -rw------- 1 cyrus users 81943 Apr 3 08:42 22186.
    > -rw------- 1 cyrus users 81844 Apr 3 08:42 22187.
    >
    > Also
    >
    > Apr 3 09:02:45 brooks sync_client[5249]: Hit upload limit 0 at UID 119493
    > for user.BBB, sending
    >
    > -rw------- 1 cyrus users 1248 Apr 3 09:02 119493.
    > -rw------- 1 cyrus users 4548 Apr 3 09:02 119494.
    >
    > I have also seen the "error" when a user has moved emails from one folder
    > to another folder.
    >
    > Regards
    > Stephen Carr
    >
    > Bron Gondwana wrote:
    >> On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 07:46:33AM -0400, Ken Murchison wrote:
    >>> Bron Gondwana wrote:
    >>>> On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 07:19:07AM -0400, Ken Murchison wrote:
    >>>>> Bron Gondwana wrote:
    >>>>>> On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 09:51:50PM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote:
    >>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 11:28:07AM +1030, Stephen Carr wrote:
    >>>>>>>> I get the following type of error (see below) during replication
    >>>>>>>> that
    >>>>>>>> appeared after upgrading from 2.3.8 to 2.3.11.
    >>>>>>> BAH - upload_messages_from() is broken.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Will reply shortly with a patch,
    >>>>>> Ken - CCing you on this one since you'll want this for CVS.
    >>>>>> I have compile tested this - haven't rolled it out anywhere,
    >>>>>> but it's pretty trivial.
    >>>>> I understand the missing check for max_count's value, but is there a
    >>>>> reason why you're not checking that its negative?
    >>>> unsigned
    >>> Ah, right. Since config_getint() returns signed, we should probably
    >>> make
    >>> max_count signed
    >> Sounds reasonable - then I'm happy with <= 0 :)
    >>
    >> Bron.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >

    -- 
    Kenneth Murchison
    Systems Programmer
    Project Cyrus Developer/Maintainer
    Carnegie Mellon University
    ----
    Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
    Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
    List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
    

  • Next message: Stephen Carr: "Re: Sync_client error Hit upload limit 0"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD